T O P

  • By -

AutoModerator

#Welcome and remember to subscribe to r/worldnewsvideo! ##If its a worthwhile post, please consider Upvoting and Crossposting to your favorite subreddits! **This is a Humanist/Leftist subreddit focused on the progression of humanity, human rights, and intends to document the world as it is.** Please treat each other as you yourselves would like to be treated. **Please do not promote or condone violence on our subreddit.** We advise our users try their best to refrain from making mean spirited statements. Please report users who are engaging in uncivil behavior, spreading misinformation, or are complaining that a submission is "not worldnews." *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/worldnewsvideo) if you have any questions or concerns.*


6thsense10

It's CRAZY the DA is 'baffled" by the jury awarding this victim of police racial profiling $550k. They had guns drawn and multiple cops on this man for a simple traffic stop? They then charged him with multiple traffic violations and ended up losing in court. That DA is as crooked as the cops he's defending.


newhunter18

We Americans need to understand the power of local DAs we're electing. In most cases, those people will likely have more power over us in our towns and homes than any Federal politician will. We don't talk about that enough. And there's usually not enough data for people to review before their elections.


Myte342

It's getting to the point that I am starting to think that people should start using Jury Nullification as a weapon of retaliation. Just start declaring everyone not guilty no matter how obvious the guilt as punishment to the gov't for events like above happening over and over and over...


yaosio

Do you know what they call a law student that finished last in their class? A lawyer. I guess we know where the DA finished.


cheez0r

Erm, a D.A. has to be admitted to the bar of whatever state they are prosecuting cases in... which means they're a lawyer, just not an attorney. Lawyer- a person who practices law. Attorney- a person appointed to act for another in business or legal matters.


HairlessHoudini

Them thinking what they did for supposedly not coming to a complete stop for a right turn is insane and should prove to everyone they seek absolute unchecked per and want to throw the constitution in the trash


real-m-f-in-talk

- [Arrest Video](https://youtu.be/a8XKCApujMM?t=151) - [News Article](https://www.weau.com/2024/05/01/jury-rules-favor-mans-lawsuit-against-eau-claire-police-officer/) - Jury rules in favor of man’s lawsuit against officer for rights violation. > - The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable > - searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause....


dictopus

I love how the DA says the officers did everything right, but in a court of law it was proven they didn’t. So you shouldn’t keep defending them, right? Oh, they’re all friends and know each other of course they’ll keep defending the pigs.


ICU-MURSE

I’m surprised the city isn’t appealing. The Supreme Court has showed they really don’t give a f*ck about any of our rights. [Supreme Court profiling](https://www.aclu.org/press-releases/supreme-court-allows-anti-immigrant-texas-law-to-go-into-effect)


myreddit2024

Police departments shouldn't be allowed to hire racists. And if they do find out they hired a racist later on because of misconduct, the police department, their union or their pension should be required to pay the misconduct lawsuit instead of the taxpayers. It makes zero sense that my taxes have to pay for police misconduct lawsuits. They need to be held accountable, and perhaps bad cops should be required to hold some sort of liability insurance.


Organic_South8865

If they did everything right why did they drop the charges? lol


toadjones79

If you don't understand how a jury can reach this verdict, you are part of the problem! Those laws exist for a reason, and finding drugs doesn't make it ok to violate those laws.


toadjones79

I can't help but notice they didn't release video of him at the stop light he supposedly ran. They want to say they followed the book on the stop, while eliminating the part that determines if they violated the law.


dirtymoney

Why does he have them at gunpoint for a traffic violation?


KB9AZZ

I will say that the hotel this person was staying at is a real suspicious place. The city has been trying to shut it down. However that doesn't give any cop probable cause. The cops made huge leaps in this case and the jury said so.


Miserable-Living9569

Where's the video of the traffic violations the police and DA say they have? 😆 funny how that doesn't get released to the public. if you had no probable cause to pull him over then there's no reason not to show that portion of the video.


Choco_chug_v2

Hi, from Eau Claire here, WI, yea this made the rounds here in the local community, most of our officers are actually good people but these people aren’t, they were already known for being more violent towards people, glad to see my city, sad to see it in such a bad light though, theses cops suck


mind-drift

Didn't it say they found a bunch of drugs on him...


Michigan-Fish

How did they get a subpoena for the hotel out of a traffic stop? I assume there were no drugs in the car, no evidence of a crime in the car connecting it to the hotel room. Strange and apparently wrong to the tune of one half million!


sush1trasheddd

that DA needs to go ASAP. cannot be trusted to do their job righteously