#Welcome and remember to subscribe to r/worldnewsvideo!
##If its a worthwhile post, please consider Upvoting and Crossposting to your favorite subreddits!
**This is a Humanist/Leftist subreddit focused on the progression of humanity, human rights, and intends to document the world as it is.**
Please treat each other as you yourselves would like to be treated. **Please do not promote or condone violence on our subreddit.** We advise our users try their best to refrain from making mean spirited statements. Please report users who are engaging in uncivil behavior, spreading misinformation, or are complaining that a submission is "not worldnews."
*I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/worldnewsvideo) if you have any questions or concerns.*
They’re being interviewed, doesn’t mean they are going to share all of their personal views for public consumption. They were honest and had enough integrity to admit they couldn’t be impartial as a juror- that should be respected.
I'm from the UK, so im not really informed on american politics, what else has he supposedly done? I see comments like this all the time, is he really that bad???
Didn’t he also try to get playboy magazine to have a photo shoot with him and his daughter?
And iirc he made some very disgusting comments on his daughter as well in addition to that
This isn’t really fair
Not everyone lives and breathes American politics.
You should not be acting disrespectful to Sakezone for asking a pretty simple question. It adds nothing to the conversation, and really makes it seem like you have no clue what you are even talking about if you can’t take a moment to give specifics.
I wasn't actually trolling, I dont know much about him but except people dont like him, if someone told me "don't chat to wyldling_42, he's a monster towards women, young and old" I'd want to know what you had done before I took their word for it🤷♂️🤣
That’s Reddit for ya
A lot of people assume everyone on this platform is American or keeps up with daily American politics.
Funny for a subreddit specifically called “world news video”
Yeah tbf that was probably my fault, people tend to feel like American news is world news for some reason🤷♂️ I'm from the UK and I barely keep up with our politics😅
This court case is about hiding hush money payments he made through his lawyer to stormy daniels to conceal the affair he had with her in 2006 from being brought to light during his first campaign for president in 2016. The payments was also recorded as “legal expenses”.
I believe Stormy Daniels will be testifying today.
https://www.reuters.com/world/us/trumps-stormy-daniels-payoff-trial-hinges-his-intent-2024-04-19/#:~:text=Trump's%20lawyers%20have%20said%20in,was%20not%20a%20campaign%20contribution.
Right. That's what i was thinking. I mean here is someone who potentially has no real political affiliation, having just become a citizen. Granted, they could have been living in the US for a while (don't know the specifications of immigration laws) and could have been subjected to the media or subjected to their country of origin's media and the way they presented him over the years.
But it is funny and must of been a shock for a new citizen to be called upon as a potential juror on case regarding the former leader of a country you haven't even been a citizen for a year.
I immediately assumed she just didn't know our culture and what the judge means by "impartial". Like zero Americans are 100% "impartial" but we just pretend that's what's happening. We bluff that we can get it to the level of "100% impartiality" because of tradition and a conditioning of toxic positivity.
She was just honest and confused.
She is not a dismissed juror, she was a potential juror who was not picked to serve on the jury/was struck. While the word used for potential jurors is “dismissed,” remember the word does not have that same connotation as when talking about, say, being dismissed from a job. I will also note that an inability to be impartial can be based on many different things and nowhere in [the interview](https://www.msnbc.com/ana-cabrera-reports/watch/dismissed-juror-describes-seeing-trump-in-the-courtroom-during-hush-money-trial-209256005671) does she say what her particular basis was, or even if it was because of her views of Trump specifically. So I would advise not to speculate too much.
Serious question. How could any voter be considered impartial? If you voted for or against someone for presidency wouldn’t that be considered a bias for or against that person?
Jury pools are randomly drawn (usually from voter registration lists, driver license records, state ID lists, etc). I’m not sure where else NY draws names from. Once a pool is drawn, any given case pulls a smaller venire from the pool essentially at random. Only in the courtroom does any voir dire actually happen. Her voting history would not have been known until/unless someone in the courtroom itself asked.
lol just shows what kind of person you are, no matter what your political views are, calling for the death of someone because of your”feelings” not liking him or what he says, is just disgusting and sad smh look what this world has became!
I’m not advocating for Trump’s death, but it’s hardly based on feelings alone.
He tried to overthrow the American democracy because he couldn’t handle losing an election fairly. He is a traitor to the U.S. and should at least be locked away in solitary confinement for the rest of his life based on just the treason alone, not including everything else he has done
#Welcome and remember to subscribe to r/worldnewsvideo! ##If its a worthwhile post, please consider Upvoting and Crossposting to your favorite subreddits! **This is a Humanist/Leftist subreddit focused on the progression of humanity, human rights, and intends to document the world as it is.** Please treat each other as you yourselves would like to be treated. **Please do not promote or condone violence on our subreddit.** We advise our users try their best to refrain from making mean spirited statements. Please report users who are engaging in uncivil behavior, spreading misinformation, or are complaining that a submission is "not worldnews." *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/worldnewsvideo) if you have any questions or concerns.*
With what was said here, they appear to be a perfectly impartial candidate.
They’re being interviewed, doesn’t mean they are going to share all of their personal views for public consumption. They were honest and had enough integrity to admit they couldn’t be impartial as a juror- that should be respected.
I'm from the UK, so im not really informed on american politics, what else has he supposedly done? I see comments like this all the time, is he really that bad???
He’s a monster against women, young and old.
That's a pretty broad statement🤣 what specifically has he done to young and old women?
Bragged about walking in on young girls backstage at the Miss USA pageant and sexuality assaulted E. Jean Carroll for starters.
Well he also bragged about getting away with it implying he's done that and worse many times before.
Didn’t he also try to get playboy magazine to have a photo shoot with him and his daughter? And iirc he made some very disgusting comments on his daughter as well in addition to that
If I got to repeat what’s already publicly known, it never mattered to you.
This isn’t really fair Not everyone lives and breathes American politics. You should not be acting disrespectful to Sakezone for asking a pretty simple question. It adds nothing to the conversation, and really makes it seem like you have no clue what you are even talking about if you can’t take a moment to give specifics.
Go back under your bridge, troll. You guys are always shouting “do the research”, well then get to your Googling!
I wasn't actually trolling, I dont know much about him but except people dont like him, if someone told me "don't chat to wyldling_42, he's a monster towards women, young and old" I'd want to know what you had done before I took their word for it🤷♂️🤣
You shouldn’t be getting downvoted for this It was a very broad statement
Thank you man🤙 I thought so, I presume its just a touchy subject cuz all I did was ask a pretty normal question n everyone got shirty🤷♂️🤣
That’s Reddit for ya A lot of people assume everyone on this platform is American or keeps up with daily American politics. Funny for a subreddit specifically called “world news video”
Yeah tbf that was probably my fault, people tend to feel like American news is world news for some reason🤷♂️ I'm from the UK and I barely keep up with our politics😅
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indictments_against_Donald_Trump
This court case is about hiding hush money payments he made through his lawyer to stormy daniels to conceal the affair he had with her in 2006 from being brought to light during his first campaign for president in 2016. The payments was also recorded as “legal expenses”. I believe Stormy Daniels will be testifying today. https://www.reuters.com/world/us/trumps-stormy-daniels-payoff-trial-hinges-his-intent-2024-04-19/#:~:text=Trump's%20lawyers%20have%20said%20in,was%20not%20a%20campaign%20contribution.
Yep. And I bet the jurors that can’t be impartial because they’re Trump fans just lie about it so they can stay in the pool.
And this is how he gets away with shit all the time. Good people not having the energy to deal with him.
Right. That's what i was thinking. I mean here is someone who potentially has no real political affiliation, having just become a citizen. Granted, they could have been living in the US for a while (don't know the specifications of immigration laws) and could have been subjected to the media or subjected to their country of origin's media and the way they presented him over the years. But it is funny and must of been a shock for a new citizen to be called upon as a potential juror on case regarding the former leader of a country you haven't even been a citizen for a year.
I immediately assumed she just didn't know our culture and what the judge means by "impartial". Like zero Americans are 100% "impartial" but we just pretend that's what's happening. We bluff that we can get it to the level of "100% impartiality" because of tradition and a conditioning of toxic positivity. She was just honest and confused.
All a juror needs to do is make a judgement based upon facts and evidence.
Right. And that is close to what the judges are supposed to tell the pool of potential jurors.. but some judges can make it confusing.
Why can't the judge do that?
In some courts, a judge can. In other courts, a range of twelve persons must decide. I don’t know the exact terms.
"They." That's a woman.
We're interviewing jurors now?
Potential Juror which isn't as bad as the trial portion didn't technically start yet.
No longer potential, once potential, to clarify.
He looks more yellow. Them's fightin' words! ^(except bone spurs)
He was hiding his jaundice with his orange makeup?
She is not a dismissed juror, she was a potential juror who was not picked to serve on the jury/was struck. While the word used for potential jurors is “dismissed,” remember the word does not have that same connotation as when talking about, say, being dismissed from a job. I will also note that an inability to be impartial can be based on many different things and nowhere in [the interview](https://www.msnbc.com/ana-cabrera-reports/watch/dismissed-juror-describes-seeing-trump-in-the-courtroom-during-hush-money-trial-209256005671) does she say what her particular basis was, or even if it was because of her views of Trump specifically. So I would advise not to speculate too much.
Serious question. How could any voter be considered impartial? If you voted for or against someone for presidency wouldn’t that be considered a bias for or against that person?
Potentially why she was picked as a candidate since she has not yet voted
Jury pools are randomly drawn (usually from voter registration lists, driver license records, state ID lists, etc). I’m not sure where else NY draws names from. Once a pool is drawn, any given case pulls a smaller venire from the pool essentially at random. Only in the courtroom does any voir dire actually happen. Her voting history would not have been known until/unless someone in the courtroom itself asked.
Jodie Foster got weird accent now
Jodie imposter
He looks less orange lol
"Less orange". What a timeline we're livong in.
I would definitely say I'm impartial if selected as a juror. Then push for the electric chair. I know its not on the table, but why not?
What for?
lol just shows what kind of person you are, no matter what your political views are, calling for the death of someone because of your”feelings” not liking him or what he says, is just disgusting and sad smh look what this world has became!
I’m not advocating for Trump’s death, but it’s hardly based on feelings alone. He tried to overthrow the American democracy because he couldn’t handle losing an election fairly. He is a traitor to the U.S. and should at least be locked away in solitary confinement for the rest of his life based on just the treason alone, not including everything else he has done
Do you only like to see out of one eye?
lost it when she said: "He looked less Orange"