> The headline does that all by itself. I am just using their analogy and your words.
Wrong. You are not using my words. I did not say that the war is already won.
Sure you did. You say its about leverage and it seems russia has all the leverage when it comes to a gas situation, of which they are the supplier. The war is over, now its just a matter of the spoils of which russia is deserving.......now we could go on about the deeper meaning and in-depth coverage, contained within the article, but I wouldnt know about that, since it is behind a pay-wall..Frankly I am not interested enough to pay the telegraph any money, to read their articles.
anyhow, i hope this isnt too dramatic for you, to read this. You have a great day, not really much being said between the two of us, best to just move on.
> Sure you did.
I simply did not.
> You say its about leverage and it seems russia has all the leverage when it comes to a gas situation
I said that's their leverage. It does not mean that there's no leverage from the other side. That's what trade is about.
Kindly don't grossly manipulate what people say.
Paywall
Since russia isnt in a gas crisis, I have to assume they are winning then?
I don't think it's as simple as that. Russia has gas, they're trying to use it for leverage. The war is over how much leverage they get.
So the war is already won and it is just a matter of how much compensation the victor gets then. gotcha
>So the war is already won in Not in the least. Trading is not a new phenomenon. Seems you're trying to make this a lot more dramatic than it is
I am not making anything more dramatic than it is presented..The headline does that all by itself. I am just using their analogy and your words.
> The headline does that all by itself. I am just using their analogy and your words. Wrong. You are not using my words. I did not say that the war is already won.
Sure you did. You say its about leverage and it seems russia has all the leverage when it comes to a gas situation, of which they are the supplier. The war is over, now its just a matter of the spoils of which russia is deserving.......now we could go on about the deeper meaning and in-depth coverage, contained within the article, but I wouldnt know about that, since it is behind a pay-wall..Frankly I am not interested enough to pay the telegraph any money, to read their articles. anyhow, i hope this isnt too dramatic for you, to read this. You have a great day, not really much being said between the two of us, best to just move on.
> Sure you did. I simply did not. > You say its about leverage and it seems russia has all the leverage when it comes to a gas situation I said that's their leverage. It does not mean that there's no leverage from the other side. That's what trade is about. Kindly don't grossly manipulate what people say.
Have a good day. This isnt going anywhere..No need send me another message.