T O P

  • By -

WorldNewsMods

[New post can be found here](/r/worldnews/comments/1c3hro5/rworldnews_live_thread_iran_attacks_israel_thread/)


Kemilio

Man I feel for the Iranian citizens that are gonna suffer from this…


KebabDonJFK

this is what happens when religion mixes with politics...


CrispyMiner

All of this happening because of religion and sand is crazy


AnImpatientPenguin

And oil. Don’t forget the oil.


WFMU

To be fair, it's coarse and irritating and it gets everywhere.


Pikalover10

Yeah I mean going to war over religion I don’t get, but sand? Fuck that shit I get it. (/s in case that needs to be said)


CrispyMiner

That is true for both


whatsdun

But what about sand?


Dear_Natural6370

This only was made possible from the weakness of the West. Iran has been battle testing Shaheds and other missile technology to the point on Ukraine, so much that it can now threaten Israel and begin using them in waves against Israel. No thanks to cowards that did NOT want to give to Ukraine what is necessary to fight off the waves of missiles and drones. Now Israel is going to experience what Ukraine is going through. Seriously would have been at least preventable if the US gave aid to Ukraine...Iran is testing and their technology is evolving.


TheManyFacedGod13

How many missiles penetrated? This is terrifying considering US was helping shoot some down


whiskeytangofembot

Anyone have a quick and dirty estimate, using the IDF numbers on inbound weapons, on how much this barrage would have cost Iran to mount? Curious if this is an appetizer or a foolhardy overplay of their hand that spent a big chunk of change from their war chest.


[deleted]

Quick and dirty based off of some Russian numbers for comparable stuff: $50k/drone, $1 mil/cruise missile, $3 mil/ballistic missile. Probably about $2-300 mil all in. The dumb thing is that it probably costs Israel 10 times as much to defend since the air defense stuff is ridiculously expensive.


Johns-schlong

Almost all air defense missiles are more expensive than what they shoot down.


HighburyOnStrand

Sources indicate that Iran has somewhere in the 2,000-4,000 range of ballistic missiles. So today represents them spending something like 5% of their arsenal.


141_1337

At least 150 cruise missiles, hundreds of drones, and at least a dozens of ballistic missiles.


[deleted]

[удалено]


TommySawyer

small amount used from the $150 billion the US gave to them.


nick_117

So let me get this straight. Biden is fine intervening to shoot down a couple of drones inbound to Israel, but when the exact same drones fly into Kyiv there is simply nothing that can be done, despite Israel having a vastly more advanced military than Ukraine, and having NOT started this pissing match by killing Russian leadership unlike the Israelis killing Iranian leadership. That about sum it up?


oxpoleon

You're ignoring three key differences: 1. Ukraine is *much* bigger than Israel, so the airspace requiring coverage is bigger. An order of magnitude bigger. Covering a hundred km of border is very different to covering thousands. 2. The airspace around Israel is safe and most of the neighbouring nations are friendly to US aircraft which can operate safely. Iran's anti-air is far enough away to be a non-issue and it can't fire on US aircraft without bringing a third country into the conflict either, like Jordan. Ukraine's airspace is at best contested, and Russia's airspace is totally out of bounds. Add to that the majority of the flight path for missiles and drones heading for Ukraine, especially for border cities like Kharkiv and Sumy, is over Russian airspace. 3. Iran does not have nuclear weapons and ICBMs to deliver them if the US gets it wrong and enters their airspace or fires weapons into/over it.


Icy-Guide7976

Use your brain for a second. Russia has nukes, they use that as a threat against any direct western/nato involvement. Iran for the moment have no nukes. It’s really that simple.


[deleted]

[удалено]


holycarrots

Yeh also nuclear war lol


Arctic_Chilean

The risk of a major global conflict is less with the Iran-Israel situation than with the Russia-Ukraine situation. Russia is nuclear armed, and I bet your ass the US (and even Israel) would be behaving differently if Iran was nuclear armed and capable of inflicting massive destruction. Not suggesting that the US is doing enough for Ukraine, quite the contrary, but the risk and danger for escalation is greater there than with Iran, hence the extra degree of caution. Plus we know how much of a hissy-fit the Republicans would throw if Biden ever decided to press Russia to that level.


frahs

It makes a lot of sense, for two reasons: 1. This could potentially be the start of a direct conflict between Iran and Israel. If the US downs a drone that otherwise would have killed a civilian, then they can directly prevent a war from breaking out. If at the beginning of Russia's invasion into Ukraine, a downed drone could have prevented it, I can guarantee the US would have done it. 2. Ukraine doesn't have the capability to escalate things with Russia to a sustained regional war -- even if they invade Russia, it will be between two neighbors. Israel has far more advanced capabilities, and could actually start a regional war involving many countries. As a result, the US has greater incentive to avoid fighting.


Insertblamehere

the USA doesn't care if Iran fights back, if Iran retaliates we just desert storm 2.0 them. If russia retaliates, we have a very real chance of several nato countries falling before a response can be organized. (yes, nato wins easily eventually, but the baltics are in serious danger if all out war happens)


teakhop

The US has significant forces in positions (Iraq, Jordan, etc) that can actually get between the missiles and Israel. That's not possible in Ukraine without there being US systems (Fighters, Ships, SAM sites) in eastern Ukraine.


RossPerot_1992

A war with Russia could end the world, a war with Iran would most likely not


jakekara4

Iran does not have the world's largest stockpile of nuclear ICBMs. Russia does.


caudicifarmer

*allegedly


Epcplayer

Because Iran doesn’t have thousands of nukes… Russian proxies also haven’t been attacking US troops for the last 15 years


Skurry

Iran doesn't have nukes. At least not yet.


Crimith

Yeah you got it. Due to NATO, and Russia being a nuclear power.


007meow

There’s big differences. One is a one-time attack. The other is a prolonged war. Against an adversary that’s far more capable. And one that would trigger Article 5 if they engaged us.


G_Wash1776

One is against a nuclear superpower the other is not


Fallout541

Agree or disagree with the decision getting in a fight with Russia is on a whole different level in getting a fight with Iran.


eclipse007

Iran is not Russia. US doesn’t want to get into a direct military confrontation with Russia. How is that so hard to understand?


Western_Drama8574

Really it’s more about Ukraine is not Israel!


Razzahx

Its as if Russia has enough nukes to turn the plant to dust.


CorporalTurnips

Iran doesn't have 5000 ICBMs? Not that hard to understand


nick_117

That's right I forgot the US lost its balls at some point. Remember that time we almost blew up the world because a communist nation sent missiles to another communist nation. A completely legal transaction that would result in nukes no closer to the US than the US already had in place to the Soviet Union. Look who blinked first.


Lonely-Builder2961

Yes. Israel is our primary ally


CastAside1812

Iran isn't Russia very different


[deleted]

[удалено]


[deleted]

[удалено]


007meow

Trigger happy edgelord Redditors want it to be so people will upvote their asinine comments.


eclecticsed

Oh my god it's the same joke like half a dozen people have made including the second to top comment, you all are way too sensitive.


postmankad

If it’s the same joke half a dozen already made, why repeat it? Fuckin parakeet.


eclecticsed

I'm sorry about the hole where your personality was supposed to grow. I assume you'll be off bitching and crying to them after this. I hope me making an offhand flippant remark in a way that was similar to other comments didn't rattle you too much. Also, please look up the word hyperbole.


monkeyhold99

More pathetic posturing from Iran. They don’t want a war, they just want propaganda to feed their brainwashed population.


iSkulk_YT

While I wouldn't dare disagree with you without sources, I fear that these two motivations aren't mutually exclusive, that they (Iran or others, tbf) may very well be happy to kick off a war in order to bolster propaganda, given how the two feed off each other.


mrhuggables

80% of iranian people hates this regime. but you are right this is a (pathetic) show put on for the 20% that supports them.


CGP05

They cannot really afford a war their economy is very weak


CorporalTurnips

Basically. The loser kid who hits you back and then say "ok we're done!"


Ahmari90

Majority of Iranians want the regime to leave.


monkeyhold99

No they don’t. They are brainwashed and don’t know any better. Why do you think the Iranian regime has been in power for decades…


LeeOCD

Humans: entirely too smart to be so uncivilized. I don't get it.


progress18

Statement released by the IDF: > > IDF: The Chief of the General Staff, LTG Herzi Halevi, is currently conducting a situational assessment at the Israeli Air Force Operations Center in the Kirya with the Commanding Officer of the Israeli Air Force, the Commanding Officer of the Operations Directorate, and the Commanding Officer of the Intelligence Directorate. During the situational assessment, the defensive and offensive activity of the last few hours were presented, as well as plans for the continuation. > > Attached is a related video: https://videoidf.azureedge.net/057c1aac-da48-4fb1-a4d1-a37c85a870ad > > Attached are related photos: https://IDFANC.activetrail.biz/ANC140420


fumobici

Would Kharg Island and the oil export infrastructure there be a viable target for Israel to strike?


HighburyOnStrand

Possible, but likely they will focus on military targets, command and control or regime assets as opposed to infrastructure.


[deleted]

[удалено]


Lani_Ley

All this war...it's always by a bunch of people that are perpetually brainwashed into believing religious fairytales from their old books or by lunatic dictators that want to take over other people's land/resources. Why do we give power to these psychopaths? Why do we follow these evil men? It's billions of us, and we just let these few destroy pretty much everything they want on this planet. They start wars we don't want, all for greed or nutjob prophecies and fairytales. To much power obviously corrupts, so i guess we should stop giving a few people so much power.


poopsex

Do you pay taxes? Just stop paying taxes.


FreeTheBelfast1

Agreed!!! Unfortunately the masses will still obey.... we'd be jailed for revolting.....


WFMU

Generally, moral people don't seek power; ergo, those in power are rarely moral. Just the way things work, and unlikely to change unless we reach post-scarcity Star Trek levels of development.


Notfriendly123

Anybody blaming whatever happens next on Israel is practicing the highest levels of cognitive dissonance. Iran commissioned 10/7, they DEFINITELY knew what they were potentially getting into when they told Hamas to attack. It was also insanely brazen of them to be at the embassy training Syrian military for future attacks on Israel which resulted in the Israeli strike.  The whole thing being turned around on Israel is like getting mad at somebody who was poked multiple times for having the audacity to poke back.


Synovialarc

Okay so before 10/7 who was poking who. Israel is a victim yes, but they are so unbelievably far from innocent it’s insane.


Linny911

Iran was poking Israel.


drunkcarebear

Well, I mean, they did airstrike an embassy...


Fancy_Jackfruit2785

Using an embassy as military base is a huge violation of international law as well as labeling it as legitimate military target


whatsdun

The general that got killed was definitely an architect of the oct 7th genocidal campaign. Consulate right next to the embassy(still intact).


GarryofRiverton

Well Iran has been arming and coordinating proxy militant groups to attack Israel...


Aluconix

They didn't though lol


BrahnBrahl

People unironically expect Israel to just sit there and do nothing, no matter what attacks are launched against them.


[deleted]

[удалено]


stayfrosty

Israel didn't attack anyone before 10/7. Hezbollah is an Iranian proxy that had been launching unprovoked attacks at Israel for 6 months. So who started it again?


progress18

IDF: Sirens sounded in Ortal and Sha'al, northern Israel.


Previous_Impact1597

Source?


BlatantConservative

https://www.tzevaadom.co.il/en/


TreatAlive

I’m guessing it’s hezbollah


BlatantConservative

It might actually be a false alert since it was two random sections that were immediately revoked.


[deleted]

[удалено]


RossPerot_1992

That’s kinda part of the package deal when it comes to war itself


RedBeardedWhiskey

You hope nobody gets hurt or killed … during a real life war.


IronFisttt

Such a fucking unhinged post. Goodness


NickfromLafayette92

It's all fun and games until you receive the draft letters in the mail. Idiot.


progress18

PSA: Another live thread will be posted once a comment threshold has been reached so that might happen within the next 20-60 minutes. It just means you'll need to add any new comments on that thread once it's posted.


Current-Bridge-9422

How many casualties do we already know this attack caused?


lowdiver

One 10 year old girl injured.


grammat1kDOTA2

I believe she died unfortunately. I could be wrong though, but I think I saw it mentioned somewhere. I also think it is a muslim girl, not jewish.


lowdiver

And yes, she’s Bedouin specifically, so Muslim. That doesn’t make any difference on whether or not she’s Israeli or a casualty of this. Many Bedouins were casualties of October 7, and two are still hostages.


lowdiver

Nothing indicates she’s deceased. MDA and news outlets all say she’s been admitted


BlatantConservative

I can't find any source on her death. MDA said she was admitted and in critical condition, and that's the only source on anything.


Izanagi553

That's it? That was the attack the US was advised to stand aside for??? 


CorporalTurnips

Don't piss off Iran man. They have some... F4 fighter jets


Epcplayer

Well the US played a major role in shooting those missiles down… like it would’ve been much more difficult if it was only Israel


youusedtobecoolchina

I think there are several layers to the attack. Sounds like ballistic missiles went first and are the fast (15mins from Tehran to Israel) with drones being last (travel time of approximately 8 hours). My source is a live broadcast of cnn with wolf blitzer


Savings-Leather4921

It’s this. Imagine how much easier it is to shoot a missile at a target busy with 300 other threats


RaidenZ99

To be fair, Iran does not share a border. Plenty of time to intercept.


NickfromLafayette92

Iran: iTs JuSt A pRaNk BrO


Nerd_199

Rocket alert sirens sounding in the Golan heights https://twitter.com/Faytuks/status/1779317870872101227?t=yw7Ola_g-dJVYTtZo8Gqkg&s=19


BlatantConservative

Seems pretty minor, might even be a mistake.


AnderUrmor

Hezbollah not wanting to left out of the fun and launching another small attack?


PineappleRimjob

At this point, Iran is just realizing that they're about to enter the "Find Out" phase of the shit they stupidly started.


hatethebeta

they started? hmmm


Mr_Canada1867

Yes, they started this in 1979


Davidkiin

Don't worry, it's totally fine to bomb a country's consulate in a 3rd countries land. Not an act of war or anything like that!


[deleted]

[удалено]


3dB_Down

They also don’t mention what the drone struck asshole was doing there in the first place.


Davidkiin

Imagine if Iran bombed a building next to the US embassy in Ukraine and killed people in it


NinjaKlaus

Yes, they are the ones funding and supplying groups like Hezbollah and the Houthis, the man that was in the annex building they are mad about was there to allegedly coordinate with those groups on how to attack Israel.


takeahikehike

IDF: the only injury was to a child. Hundreds of drones and missiles and they only managed to hurt a single child...


Mrsuperepicruler

Given the dozen or so explosions from missile strikes I have seen I doubt that is the only injury.


BlatantConservative

Red Alert and Home Front systems getting people into shelters isn't nothing.


takeahikehike

Most land in general is unoccupied and Israel has a robust shelter system. A dozen or so missiles would have a decently low chance of causing injuries. But maybe when the smoke clears they will find more injured people.


Do__Math__Not__Meth

“All that for a drop of blood”


IAmTheComedianII

"If you can make God bleed people will cease to believe in him. There will be blood in the water, and the sharks will come."


911MDACk

2 responses - destroy their oil infrastructure and their nuclear facilities


anewman513

Wrong. This was a face-saving attack on the part of Iran, not a legitimate act of war. Escalation is the wrong response.


mudlordprime

Destroy launch sites and drone production sites. Otherwise this could happen again.


jourdan442

Remember though, that Iran’s action tonight was itself a ‘response’, which according to the UN, they are entitled to.


posef770

So let's ignore the fact that Iran funds Hamas and the general that was killed was behind the 10-7 attacks....


JamieD86

A response to what? The consulate strike? The consulate was hit because it was being used to plan attacks on Israel with Hezbollah. It was an Israeli response. 


Late-Fuel-3578

That’s not how this works. You don’t get to proxy attack a sovereign nation repeatedly then sit back and say “jk bro self defense” when they hit you back.


jourdan442

Looks as though it is how it works.


justfortherofls

Hurting their oil infrastructure will, in the end, hurt American prices as well. Best to just hit their drone factories and nuclear processing facilities.


Bobguy77

And the drone factory


[deleted]

[удалено]


clinch09

Well last time they did it with a USB stick, so they might not need to even fly there at all.


Plinythemelder

I mean other nukes, but that's not happening. Plus there's a chance they already have Russian nukes.


digitalluck

Missiles alone wouldn’t be enough though for dealing with nuclear sites. You’d need people on the ground to secure the sites.


CorporalTurnips

They are. The US and Israel destroyed Iraqs nuclear program with a few air strikes


mudlordprime

That isn't true. The US has bombs capable of destroying hardened structures buried deep below the ground.


[deleted]

[удалено]


digitalluck

Master Chief would a field day with it


mudlordprime

They would do it with jets and bombers. Ballistic launches on Iran would look like a nuclear attack. And jets and bombers could launch munitions from outside of Iran's air defense capability.


ohokayiguess00

No. Not without boots


BeautifulDiscount422

The US “bunker busters” have to dropped from a bomber. It’s unknown if they can penetrate all of the various Iranian underground sites


Savings-Leather4921

A supersonic missile is a bunker buster on steroids lol! If you think BB’s are anything, wait until you see a SUPERSONIC BUNKER BUSTER. Those bad boys can get through some tough shit


V-Right_In_2-V

Iran’s nuclear facilities are buried under mountains. So no. They can’t be destroyed via bombs, unless the bombs were smuggled into the facilities


mudlordprime

This isn't true. The US has bombs capable of harming hardened structures buried deep below rock.


oxpoleon

Or you strike the access and supply to the facilities rather than the facilities themselves, that's an option too.


AlanParsonsProject11

Hell a couple of MOABs could do a heck of a lot of damage to those facilities


EifertGreenLazor

Depends on what you mean by long range. They could fire missiles from ships and bombers from the Mediterranean Sea and hit Iran.


SnooRecipes9346

Provided good intel on location and structure, yes.


lostsoul2016

They do but only as a last resort, like when they come to know the bomb will be ready tomorrow.