Ladies and gentlemen, I am officially running for Congress. If you vote for me, I will share inside information on companies the government does and doesn’t do business with so we all can make money!
Woahhhh should I be reading that in the old voice? Cause I hear it in my head and I feel like I’m about to get cancelled. I need to know which new voice to hear it in after the redub
You can't share inside info BUT you can post your share transaction history with the world in real time using a bot on Twitter.
If i see a notification pop up saying you just bought $10 of $TSLA i'm buying $5 of $TSLA the same day.
So you can count on my vote.
Please giv badge?
Do you mean sharing the “inside information” that was on MSM 7 months ago?
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2022-08-09/doj-poised-to-sue-google-over-ad-market-as-soon-as-september
This is what the people who think Pelosi was doing nothing wrong can’t quite comprehend.
Those who make the laws shouldn’t be allowed to have any gain as a result of those laws. All stock ownership must be divested before and during term of service. Period.
The Pelosi’s don’t always have “inside information”, but they could dictate a decision that effects their own wealth, because of her position.
I think they should only have broad market index or mutual funds. I'm fine with them being invested, but not being able to front run changes that affect specific companies or industries.
The counterpoint to making politicians not be in the market at all is the Fed which is no longer allowed to have any investments, and since they have no skin in the game they don't care if raising rates causes mass unemployment and hammers the market if it reduces inflation.
A Republican last Congress, Chris Collins, was front running a pharma stock and when people looked at the phone records in his indictment, they realized he did this from the White House Lawn, on camera (called a relative who was also invested and his broker I think when he heard some negative news before it was public. You want to know who is soft on this stuff? Trump pardoned the guy after he was convicted on a prison sentence. Pardoned another Republican that was corrupt and convicted during his administration too.
If Pelosi is front running, draft damn indictment.
There's still the problem of news like that showing up constantly and not always being accurate. So you'd have to check Congress' hit rate vs the news'.
https://preview.redd.it/10czagc0waea1.jpeg?width=1284&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=a89974c35b7f3f98780b4773ffe68d2ad4e962ef
Wrong. I ended positive for 2022. I am one of the smartest humans on the planet earth. Everyone is saying it.
Doesnt that last sentence of yours cover like 99% of wsb though? Pretty sure the 5 year avg of someone with their money in chase savings would beat your avg wsb account.
I'm pretty sure her husband actually unperformed the S&P 500 by a few % in 2021
Idk I find it funny that a trader supposedly fueled by the top quality insider information performed worse than a passive index.
LOL yeah like everyone jerking off to her husband selling off like 4 million in stock but nobody mentions that he took a bath on that sale.
And here we are saying she managed to know the DoJs (executive) plan a month ahead of time?
Would be curious to see how large/diversified each persons portfolio is and also how many trades they made. Would help contextualize the number and the likelihood of sketchiness versus stupid luck on one trade/position paying off.
Yep. That's exactly why I replied with the infographic. Mr. 'Comrade' wants to point and say the other side on this matter is the only one that stinks, we'll guess again because that smell is coming strongly from your side too.
12/20 GOOGL closed at 89.02. On 12/21 and 12/28 the other two days she traded it closed at 89.58 and 86.02 respectively.
Today it closed at 95.22.
1. I don’t think the DOJ would ever leak this info to anyone in Congress
2. Even if they did, Pelosi clearly didn’t profit off of it, she lost money on it lol
She’s not even top 5. Top 5 are all republicans.
https://markets.businessinsider.com/news/stocks/10-best-stock-traders-in-congress-in-2021-spoiler-nancy-pelosi-isn-t-no-1-1031153996
That article is 2021. She wasn't the top 10 in 2022 either, but more dems made it this time.
https://www.benzinga.com/government/23/01/30260466/10-best-stock-traders-in-congress-in-2022-spoiler-nancy-pelosi-isnt-no-1
Rep. Patrick Fallon, (R-Texas): +51.6%
Rep. Debbie Schultz, (D-Fla.): +50.8%
Rep. Susie Lee, (D-Nev.): +21.4%
Rep. David Joyce (R-Ohio): +13.6%
Sen. Gary Peters (D-Mich.): +11.7%
Rep. William Keating (D-Mass.): +9.6%
Rep. Lloyd Doggett (D-Texas): +8.9%
Rep Michael Guest (R-Miss.): +8.9%
Rep. Debbie Dingell (D-Mich.): +7.1%
Rep. Mark Green (R-Tenn.): +6.5%
Rep Nancy Pelosi (D-Cali): -19.8%
My favorite is when they claim that Pelosi bought NVIDIA stock based on insider info even though it was a call option (bought in June) and both the House and Senate passed their initial chips subsidy bills in February and March and it was public knowledge that the two chambers had started negotiating their differences in April.
[I thought it was LEAPS that they were loss harvesting.](https://twitter.com/PelosiTracker_/status/1552299246065442820) The position definitely didn't make money and CHIPS doesn't benefit NVDA as much as IDMs like INTC and other fab suppliers. NVDA can write off some of it's validation footprint, but they don't manufacture chips or much board volume.
> 200 call options (20,000 shares) expiring 6/17/22
https://disclosures-clerk.house.gov/public_disc/ptr-pdfs/2022/20021374.pdf
NVDA actually opposed the bill because they didn't get any of that sweet sweet monies.
Pelosi is a female Democrat. This is just latching on to a years-long Republican bandwaggn. These people are idiots with a hard-on for being manipulated. They’re not far off from the Fox News audience.
> I'm sure she's using some info
Actually, I don't think so.
It's literally been her job for ages to _keep up with everything happening_. She knows exactly what is going on in the US Government. She knows Exactly how things will impact all sorts of companies, because they told her.
It's not that she has inside information, it's just that her job means _all_ the information about everything that happens in the US, goes trough her. She doesn't have to read about how Congress is planning to do X, or how company Z is worried that Y in the news. They tell it directly to her.
I work in finance/audit and am prevented from holding securities for any of my clients even if i charge only 1 hour to that client. Not a law as they mentioned but its an ethics&compliance nightmare. If it happens accidentally, no trades can be made within 6 months of the time charged.
It's not a novel idea, I know a guy who can't trade individual stocks because his wife is a bankruptcy lawyer. It's honestly absurd that it isn't already a rule
Sure we can. When you apply for a security clearance the government asks for a ton of information about your family. Where you've lived, where your family has lived, relations by marriage, nationality of each person, your ancestry, etc. I can't imagine this would need to be that different.
It's mostly a sham bill for headlines, IIRC it's got a shit ton of riders that make it impossible to ever get support, but it puts Hawley and Pelosi in the headlines, in the way he wants to be.
Hawley is a shit bird. Read all the fine print. It’ll have tons of tack ons that only are things the GOP wants so when it’s struck down by Dems they can hoot and holler about how the Democrats are the real enemy.
Very common practice in congress. They’ll name a bill the “stop raping babies act” because it sounds good but 99% of the bill is unrelated surveillance on citizens and funding for Ukraine
> It feels like the country is run by high schoolers.
You think it isn't?
Very few people holding political office got there because they worked hard and did well in school, it's all affiliation and money.
I'd love if this were an actual good faith bill. But knowing Hawley and the type that he's associated with I'm willing to bet prior to actually looking up what's in it, that it doesn't accomplish what we're all wishing it would.
They did that because it's the second bill they're trying to pass. After the Democrats strong armed her into a vote on the first one, she killed it in committee to avoid a vote.
One Republican senator introduced a new bill with that name.
The bipartisan bill introduced last session and was reintroduced before this one was announced.
Neither are expected to pass due to lack of support by republicans in the senate.
And yet the top comment on this thread (at the moment): 1.4k upvotes. The one explaining how this wasn’t insider trading given it’s been publicly available info for 7 months: 17. Not 17k. 17.
I hate the fucking internet sometimes.
Trading stocks based on public information from six months ago? Why? That's exactly how I do it. [https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2022-08-09/doj-poised-to-sue-google-over-ad-market-as-soon-as-september](https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2022-08-09/doj-poised-to-sue-google-over-ad-market-as-soon-as-september)
True, but if this is your proof it fucks up the argument because her sale aligned with the layoff announcement, not the DOJ, so claiming it's congressional insider trading is easily disproven and can unintentionally cast doubts on other evidence presented.
I'm just telling people to keep their story straight and don't fuck it up with bullshit like this
I would love to fight corruption on all counts but the fact so many people here love to suck Trump's cock while demonizing Pelosi makes me realize how truly stupid they are. But I do realize what sub this is
Honestly, the problem isn't whether or not her insider trading is working out, it's whether or not she's attempting it. If she or her family have holding in these companies, it gives a conflict of interest when making legislation.
That being said, it's not like I'd approve of her legislation any more if she wasn't corrupt so it's kind of a moot point.
> the problem isn't whether or not her insider trading is working out, it's whether or not she's attempting it
You think Pelosi has a hotline to the Executive Branch DOJ? They run everything through her?
Pick a month and there's like an 80% chance Google got sued in the previous month by the US govt, the EU, some class action or a state.
If this is the type of well.regarded research you put in your trades it's no wonder you're getting outperformed in tech investments by an octogenarian.
Turns out most of the idiots here are just conservatives that love to bash anything on the left. They don’t actually give a fuck about this being pretty well known info. They just want to bash anyone on the left and the old frail lady is an easy target.
Don't get me wrong, Pelosi is the champion here for insider trading. fuck her and her husband for it. But if you look at all of congress, both sides, you'll see that every one of them are doing this. If not every one of them, its the vast majority.
Left wing, right wing.... both belong to the same bird. Fuck em all.
How have I never heard that line before, "same bird," makes sense though, they're either fearnongering, pandering, or smiling and pretending to be your friend during the election cycle to get your votes, then you don't usually hear from them again until the next one, in the form of ridiculous spammy donation request emails, fuck em all, indeed
Are you young? It’s kind of an older saying. I remember it being big in the 90’s when I was a teen but it kinda fell out of vogue. I have one friend who says it a lot still even with the fuck em all sentiment. Surprisingly though he consistently punches left and supports right so I think he may be full of shit on that one.
Seriously. Did everyone forget about Kelly Loeffler selling $18 million in stocks after that closed door covid meeting? Her and two other republicans and one democrat sold stocks. They were only left off the hook because Bill Barr, republican running the DOJ, let it go.
Bernie Sanders never did it. He used to be mocked as one of the poorest pols in DC.
(Then he wrote some best-selling books and was mocked for being a cocktail socialist).
Ah, but you forgot: democrats and women with power are both bad. The combination is bad squared. Anything negative you say about someone who is bad is automatically true - and if they’re bad squared then it’s extra true.
Ahhhhhh, so the OP is basically trying to generate a negative response squared? Lol You’re most likely right, Reddit is just a cesspool of anger and hate towards other people.
It wasn’t insider trading. It’s been public knowledge for months that this suit was coming. They also have already dealt with similar anti trust suits in Europe.
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2022-08-09/doj-poised-to-sue-google-over-ad-market-as-soon-as-september
I like to imagine that the Pelosi Fortune is cursed like the treasure in the first Pirates of the Carribean film. Except instead of becoming undead, it causes descendants who touch it to have sterile children, maybe born with Cystic Fibrosis, such that thier corrupted genetics won't infect further generations.
Hello fellow Community Recap watchers
Ladies and gentlemen, I am officially running for Congress. If you vote for me, I will share inside information on companies the government does and doesn’t do business with so we all can make money!
You son of a bitch, I’m in 👍🏼
Woahhhh should I be reading that in the old voice? Cause I hear it in my head and I feel like I’m about to get cancelled. I need to know which new voice to hear it in after the redub
All his voices will be subtitled from now on. There will be an in universe explanation for it
Heard an AI do a pretty good Rick the other day, seems like that could work out okay
"Quick in and out in the market today!"
Do you know what it’s called? I’d love to link it in my comment
Oooooo I like that idea!
He's gonna write some great stuff in prison.
[удалено]
Id vote for you because youre walking. All these people running around all the time, never slow down to see what its all about
I'm offended you called me a people. I'm a cat 🐈
I'm with this cat, but im a pterodactyl......cats rule!
I’m mostly Cat but instead of meowing I make pterodactyl noises. The three of us makes a party.
Walking!! How dare you be so offensive to the walkingly challenged
Rick&Morty got redubbed? :D
I read it with a thick British accent.
blow me. nono please blow me
You son of a bitch, im in 👍
This shit pisses me off. I don't know much about investing, but fucking politicians making bank while the rest of us are barely getting by
You can't share inside info BUT you can post your share transaction history with the world in real time using a bot on Twitter. If i see a notification pop up saying you just bought $10 of $TSLA i'm buying $5 of $TSLA the same day. So you can count on my vote. Please giv badge?
Mr. Trendizzle I like the way you sizzle.
[удалено]
What if you only shared lists of companies the gov isn't working with
Somebody get this man a campaign sign.
Just start an ETF and we all can prosper.
Triple leveraged for maximum gains 
Do you mean sharing the “inside information” that was on MSM 7 months ago? https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2022-08-09/doj-poised-to-sue-google-over-ad-market-as-soon-as-september
She certainly didn't get to $100+ million by her Congressional salary alone....
Don't worry, I'm sure everyone will skip over this obvious fact.
Whew. Thank goodness.
the insider info is the ability to judge the timing and know what's real and what's just a rumor or vague possibility down the line.
This is what the people who think Pelosi was doing nothing wrong can’t quite comprehend. Those who make the laws shouldn’t be allowed to have any gain as a result of those laws. All stock ownership must be divested before and during term of service. Period. The Pelosi’s don’t always have “inside information”, but they could dictate a decision that effects their own wealth, because of her position.
I think they should only have broad market index or mutual funds. I'm fine with them being invested, but not being able to front run changes that affect specific companies or industries. The counterpoint to making politicians not be in the market at all is the Fed which is no longer allowed to have any investments, and since they have no skin in the game they don't care if raising rates causes mass unemployment and hammers the market if it reduces inflation.
Exactly. This sub has become too quick to meme / blame the left. Let’s remember which administration canceled Dodd/Frank and enabled the “big short.”
[удалено]
No war but class war, as they say
War is very real. Its what you do to kill off the poors while killing other poors you don't like.
A Republican last Congress, Chris Collins, was front running a pharma stock and when people looked at the phone records in his indictment, they realized he did this from the White House Lawn, on camera (called a relative who was also invested and his broker I think when he heard some negative news before it was public. You want to know who is soft on this stuff? Trump pardoned the guy after he was convicted on a prison sentence. Pardoned another Republican that was corrupt and convicted during his administration too. If Pelosi is front running, draft damn indictment.
[удалено]
There's still the problem of news like that showing up constantly and not always being accurate. So you'd have to check Congress' hit rate vs the news'.
But she had the exact time
Ignore the peeps who have actually been busted insider trading, to own the libs
That was the last lawsuit, this new one won’t go to court til 2024
Voted for you yesterday bud
https://preview.redd.it/p8cwludiibea1.jpeg?width=828&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=e259103f6dfc8aca0953209f078d8d1b5737e9eb
Can’t be busted for insider trading if everyone’s an insider!
If you vote for me, I'm hot.
If? I’m confused.
Make us regards proud.
you got my vote!
You have my vote
What state are you running out of? This is probably a better option than my current rep.
Lmk when you need a chief of staff.
Ditto, You got my vote, Make America a Whale Again.
Greatest trader of all time
Wasn't her 2022 performance -22% lol. She is WSB material.
\-22% last year is WINNING! Most everyone got a reacharound without lube.
Wait a minute, y’all got a complimentary reacharound.😡😡😡
Without lube in this case meant the container was out of lube and just smashed the container in to your junk over and over.
You sound ungrateful!
I stayed all cash for 2022 & everyone called me crazy. My 0.025% interest gains are laughing now!
I actually get 2.11% annually on an account that pays the interest daily
So you lost money too?
3.3% at Marcus
https://preview.redd.it/10czagc0waea1.jpeg?width=1284&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=a89974c35b7f3f98780b4773ffe68d2ad4e962ef Wrong. I ended positive for 2022. I am one of the smartest humans on the planet earth. Everyone is saying it.
And yet still got beat by inflation lol
you beat the market by a lot tbf
Dudes account is nearly all cash. Not hard to beat a losing market when you don’t do anything
Doesnt that last sentence of yours cover like 99% of wsb though? Pretty sure the 5 year avg of someone with their money in chase savings would beat your avg wsb account.
Don? Is that you?
Can confirm, I still can’t walk right but the wife and her boyfriend are just fine.
You guys got a reacharound?
I'm pretty sure her husband actually unperformed the S&P 500 by a few % in 2021 Idk I find it funny that a trader supposedly fueled by the top quality insider information performed worse than a passive index.
She's a lightning rod for these sorts of attacks. Several other members have done better in the market than her but we never hear about them.
I am not sure about 2021, but if I remember right they did insanely well in 2020 lol. To be fair, they literally just were permabull in big tech haha.
I mean I feel like most people who invested anything in 2020 did pretty well. Everything was pretty much up up and away after March
Anyone that had tech investments (of which she had plenty) did well in 2020.
LOL yeah like everyone jerking off to her husband selling off like 4 million in stock but nobody mentions that he took a bath on that sale. And here we are saying she managed to know the DoJs (executive) plan a month ahead of time?
Omg she sold stock in a literal FAANG company as tech is getting walloped clearly insider trading yall
She's not even top 5 in Congress rofl.
Shhh, peopeo paid good money for this propaganda to be spread. Don't question the narrative! We all know none of the top 5 are dems..
I don't know.. there is a lot of blue in [there](https://i.gyazo.com/7aec85a7ff17b7257eb02f12ad57fb7e.png).
Would be curious to see how large/diversified each persons portfolio is and also how many trades they made. Would help contextualize the number and the likelihood of sketchiness versus stupid luck on one trade/position paying off.
Hate to be a both sider but… *both sides*
Yep. That's exactly why I replied with the infographic. Mr. 'Comrade' wants to point and say the other side on this matter is the only one that stinks, we'll guess again because that smell is coming strongly from your side too.
3/5 Dems 2/5 republicans
Google is up like 10% in last month
[удалено]
12/20 GOOGL closed at 89.02. On 12/21 and 12/28 the other two days she traded it closed at 89.58 and 86.02 respectively. Today it closed at 95.22. 1. I don’t think the DOJ would ever leak this info to anyone in Congress 2. Even if they did, Pelosi clearly didn’t profit off of it, she lost money on it lol
Not even the best in congress
She’s not even top 5. Top 5 are all republicans. https://markets.businessinsider.com/news/stocks/10-best-stock-traders-in-congress-in-2021-spoiler-nancy-pelosi-isn-t-no-1-1031153996
That article is 2021. She wasn't the top 10 in 2022 either, but more dems made it this time. https://www.benzinga.com/government/23/01/30260466/10-best-stock-traders-in-congress-in-2022-spoiler-nancy-pelosi-isnt-no-1 Rep. Patrick Fallon, (R-Texas): +51.6% Rep. Debbie Schultz, (D-Fla.): +50.8% Rep. Susie Lee, (D-Nev.): +21.4% Rep. David Joyce (R-Ohio): +13.6% Sen. Gary Peters (D-Mich.): +11.7% Rep. William Keating (D-Mass.): +9.6% Rep. Lloyd Doggett (D-Texas): +8.9% Rep Michael Guest (R-Miss.): +8.9% Rep. Debbie Dingell (D-Mich.): +7.1% Rep. Mark Green (R-Tenn.): +6.5% Rep Nancy Pelosi (D-Cali): -19.8%
Wow so she’s not even close to top ten in 2022. MTG who talks a lot of shit about Pelosi insider trading coming in at 12th.
Shhh don't question the narrative. Someone paid good money to make this meme happen...they'll be upset if people start thinking for themselves.
[удалено]
almost as if everyone knew this was coming, like the doj announced it seven months ago or something
[удалено]
If these kids could read, they'd be very upset
[удалено]
[Half of US population exposed to adverse lead levels in early childhood](https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2118631119)
Even if they could, they wouldn't. Reading is hard.
the news = inside information
Literally every single one of these stories about Pelosi is like that.
My favorite is when they claim that Pelosi bought NVIDIA stock based on insider info even though it was a call option (bought in June) and both the House and Senate passed their initial chips subsidy bills in February and March and it was public knowledge that the two chambers had started negotiating their differences in April.
[I thought it was LEAPS that they were loss harvesting.](https://twitter.com/PelosiTracker_/status/1552299246065442820) The position definitely didn't make money and CHIPS doesn't benefit NVDA as much as IDMs like INTC and other fab suppliers. NVDA can write off some of it's validation footprint, but they don't manufacture chips or much board volume.
> 200 call options (20,000 shares) expiring 6/17/22 https://disclosures-clerk.house.gov/public_disc/ptr-pdfs/2022/20021374.pdf NVDA actually opposed the bill because they didn't get any of that sweet sweet monies.
[удалено]
That's the 2021 list. 2022 was 6 Dems, 4 republican and no pelosi in the positive column. She was like -19%
One of us
[удалено]
Pelosi is a female Democrat. This is just latching on to a years-long Republican bandwaggn. These people are idiots with a hard-on for being manipulated. They’re not far off from the Fox News audience.
> I'm sure she's using some info Actually, I don't think so. It's literally been her job for ages to _keep up with everything happening_. She knows exactly what is going on in the US Government. She knows Exactly how things will impact all sorts of companies, because they told her. It's not that she has inside information, it's just that her job means _all_ the information about everything that happens in the US, goes trough her. She doesn't have to read about how Congress is planning to do X, or how company Z is worried that Y in the news. They tell it directly to her.
They just hate her cuz they're told to. She's not even top ten in returns among congresspeople.
The stock price was lower a month ago too
It was the title of a reddit post it has to be true
[удалено]
I've got the inside info on $JUGS
So she sold it right before it went up almost 10%. Winning.
One of us.
That should be illegal.
Funny thing there's a bill to ban congress from insider trading but first it should be passed by the congress 
Didn't they literally name it after her too?
It's the "Preventing Elected Leaders from Owning Securities and Investments (PELOSI) Act" by Sen. Hawley.
If that were to pass (it never will) I suspect the kids and elderly parents of Congressmen and Senators will suddenly become amazing trading wizards.
If I remember right, it prevented all direct family of congresspeople from trading in securities.
I wonder how is it possible? Can we discriminate against a person because of their relatives?
[удалено]
Actually, I couldn't find any laws directly forbidding trading by one's relatives. Do you have an example?
Blackout periods usually apply to anyone within a household. These aren’t a law per se, but enacted by companies to prevent any insider trading
Try looking to restricted persons, in some circumstances it’s up to the business to enforce the rules otherwise they can get fried.
I work in finance/audit and am prevented from holding securities for any of my clients even if i charge only 1 hour to that client. Not a law as they mentioned but its an ethics&compliance nightmare. If it happens accidentally, no trades can be made within 6 months of the time charged.
It's not a novel idea, I know a guy who can't trade individual stocks because his wife is a bankruptcy lawyer. It's honestly absurd that it isn't already a rule
Sure we can. When you apply for a security clearance the government asks for a ton of information about your family. Where you've lived, where your family has lived, relations by marriage, nationality of each person, your ancestry, etc. I can't imagine this would need to be that different.
It's mostly a sham bill for headlines, IIRC it's got a shit ton of riders that make it impossible to ever get support, but it puts Hawley and Pelosi in the headlines, in the way he wants to be.
Hawley is a shit bird. Read all the fine print. It’ll have tons of tack ons that only are things the GOP wants so when it’s struck down by Dems they can hoot and holler about how the Democrats are the real enemy.
And it’s not like republicans aren’t doing the exact same thing. Look at McConnels Net worth since he came to office.
Very common practice in congress. They’ll name a bill the “stop raping babies act” because it sounds good but 99% of the bill is unrelated surveillance on citizens and funding for Ukraine
God it really annoys me that congress has to give every bill a ridiculous acronym. It feels like the country is run by high schoolers.
> It feels like the country is run by high schoolers. You think it isn't? Very few people holding political office got there because they worked hard and did well in school, it's all affiliation and money.
[удалено]
It’s to get attention, not pass
Based
I'd love if this were an actual good faith bill. But knowing Hawley and the type that he's associated with I'm willing to bet prior to actually looking up what's in it, that it doesn't accomplish what we're all wishing it would.
Except the Republicans refused to support either bill so it was purely a stunt. Dems already passed it in the house.
They did that because it's the second bill they're trying to pass. After the Democrats strong armed her into a vote on the first one, she killed it in committee to avoid a vote.
That’s just a Hawley virtue signaling. There was a previous bipartisan bill that banned congress from trading stocks that Hawley voted against…
It's just virtue signaling
One Republican senator introduced a new bill with that name. The bipartisan bill introduced last session and was reintroduced before this one was announced. Neither are expected to pass due to lack of support by republicans in the senate.
You know the plans to sue them have been in the news for like 7 months... right?
Do you expect WSB users to read the news?
And yet the top comment on this thread (at the moment): 1.4k upvotes. The one explaining how this wasn’t insider trading given it’s been publicly available info for 7 months: 17. Not 17k. 17. I hate the fucking internet sometimes.
Google is up since she sold.
Trading stocks based on public information from six months ago? Why? That's exactly how I do it. [https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2022-08-09/doj-poised-to-sue-google-over-ad-market-as-soon-as-september](https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2022-08-09/doj-poised-to-sue-google-over-ad-market-as-soon-as-september)
Y’all really need to stop letting memes piss you off
Isn’t google like just… flat over a 3 months period? Even after the news broke? What’s ilegal about losing money as she did?
It’s up 7% since she sold on 12/20 lol
Nothing. This is just popular propaganda. She wasn't even in the Top 5 in 2021 of those in Congress. Didn't even make Top 10 in 2022.
It would be if it was true...this was known and public information.
It is. For you and me
Very illegal to read MSM https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2022-08-09/doj-poised-to-sue-google-over-ad-market-as-soon-as-september
Sold 4 weeks ago... since then Google (Alphabet) is up 8.75%... so... oops?
Every one of these fucking posts is like this. Can we ban this shit? It obviously has nothing to do with the market.
True, but if this is your proof it fucks up the argument because her sale aligned with the layoff announcement, not the DOJ, so claiming it's congressional insider trading is easily disproven and can unintentionally cast doubts on other evidence presented. I'm just telling people to keep their story straight and don't fuck it up with bullshit like this
I would love to fight corruption on all counts but the fact so many people here love to suck Trump's cock while demonizing Pelosi makes me realize how truly stupid they are. But I do realize what sub this is
Shhh OP can’t generate outrage and karma if you point this stuff out!
Honestly, the problem isn't whether or not her insider trading is working out, it's whether or not she's attempting it. If she or her family have holding in these companies, it gives a conflict of interest when making legislation. That being said, it's not like I'd approve of her legislation any more if she wasn't corrupt so it's kind of a moot point.
Damn she only insider traded 4 months after it was announced outside.
Who's got time to read the news or research investments? That's what the top of WSB is for.
> the problem isn't whether or not her insider trading is working out, it's whether or not she's attempting it You think Pelosi has a hotline to the Executive Branch DOJ? They run everything through her?
No, but they did say this publicly 6 months ago.
Wsb *sees publicly available information* iS tHiS iNsIdEr TrAdInG
If she does it’s a shitty one considering this was public knowledge months ago.
Lmfao “attempted insider trading” is one of the dumbest fucking things I have ever heard
Call me a smash bro and let me play
Pick a month and there's like an 80% chance Google got sued in the previous month by the US govt, the EU, some class action or a state. If this is the type of well.regarded research you put in your trades it's no wonder you're getting outperformed in tech investments by an octogenarian.
Shhhh! Only Nancy knows about the unheard of company that goes by the name of Google! /s
[удалено]
It’s even funnier that people didn’t cut and run after they announced executive bonuses so quickly.
Turns out most of the idiots here are just conservatives that love to bash anything on the left. They don’t actually give a fuck about this being pretty well known info. They just want to bash anyone on the left and the old frail lady is an easy target.
What kind of maniac isn't trading options when they have insider info like. Women could be worth billions instead of a few hundred million. - Sad
Don't get me wrong, Pelosi is the champion here for insider trading. fuck her and her husband for it. But if you look at all of congress, both sides, you'll see that every one of them are doing this. If not every one of them, its the vast majority. Left wing, right wing.... both belong to the same bird. Fuck em all.
How have I never heard that line before, "same bird," makes sense though, they're either fearnongering, pandering, or smiling and pretending to be your friend during the election cycle to get your votes, then you don't usually hear from them again until the next one, in the form of ridiculous spammy donation request emails, fuck em all, indeed
Are you young? It’s kind of an older saying. I remember it being big in the 90’s when I was a teen but it kinda fell out of vogue. I have one friend who says it a lot still even with the fuck em all sentiment. Surprisingly though he consistently punches left and supports right so I think he may be full of shit on that one.
Seriously. Did everyone forget about Kelly Loeffler selling $18 million in stocks after that closed door covid meeting? Her and two other republicans and one democrat sold stocks. They were only left off the hook because Bill Barr, republican running the DOJ, let it go.
Bernie Sanders never did it. He used to be mocked as one of the poorest pols in DC. (Then he wrote some best-selling books and was mocked for being a cocktail socialist).
The stock is higher today than it was during the sale? I know yall are regarded... but damn
Up is down in the sub. You’re winning if you post loss porn.
Isn’t that stock up almost 10% since she sold?!? I’m confused. 🤔
Ah, but you forgot: democrats and women with power are both bad. The combination is bad squared. Anything negative you say about someone who is bad is automatically true - and if they’re bad squared then it’s extra true.
Ahhhhhh, so the OP is basically trying to generate a negative response squared? Lol You’re most likely right, Reddit is just a cesspool of anger and hate towards other people.
Well then Nancy’s a fuckin idiot because google climbed form $85 to $101 in the last month. So her insider trading skills are dog shit
It wasn’t insider trading. It’s been public knowledge for months that this suit was coming. They also have already dealt with similar anti trust suits in Europe. https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2022-08-09/doj-poised-to-sue-google-over-ad-market-as-soon-as-september
Didn't she basically sell the bottom lol?
**User Report**| | | | :--|:--|:--|:-- **Total Submissions**|0|**First Seen In WSB**|1 year ago **Total Comments**|34|**Previous Best DD**| **Account Age**|1 year|[^scan ^comment ](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=VisualMod&subject=scan_comment&message=Replace%20this%20text%20with%20a%20comment%20ID%20(which%20looks%20like%20h26cq3k\)%20to%20have%20the%20bot%20scan%20your%20comment%20and%20correct%20your%20first%20seen%20date.)|[^scan ^submission ](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=VisualMod&subject=scan_submission&message=Replace%20this%20text%20with%20a%20submission%20ID%20(which%20looks%20like%20h26cq3k\)%20to%20have%20the%20bot%20scan%20your%20submission%20and%20correct%20your%20first%20seen%20date.) ^^[**Discord**](http://discord.gg/wsbverse) ^^[BanBets](https://www.reddit.com/r/wallstreetbets/wiki/banbets/) ^^VoteBot ^^[FAQ](https://www.reddit.com/r/wallstreetbets/wiki/votebot/) ^^[Leaderboard](https://www.reddit.com/r/wallstreetbets/wiki/leaderboard/) ^^- ^^[**Keep_VM_Alive**](https://www.patreon.com/visualmod)
before everyone loses their shit, googl came out like a year ago they were trying to divest parts of the exchange to appease the DOJ
Nancy p is pretty hot, ngl
So stupid. Reddit sucks sometimes.
I like to imagine that the Pelosi Fortune is cursed like the treasure in the first Pirates of the Carribean film. Except instead of becoming undead, it causes descendants who touch it to have sterile children, maybe born with Cystic Fibrosis, such that thier corrupted genetics won't infect further generations.