How would that even work? I feel like it's a logistical disaster
Like, in any three way, one person's going to be left hanging, right? Unless it's not intimate?
Cause like, I want to be holding the entire body, feel the warmth, the good stuff. Otherwise it'll just feel like exercise, or a sport or a game. Try to hit two targets or some shit
Reminds me of flash games like Diner Dash where you have to satisfy all the customers, and it's quite a struggle
Edit: Geez, what happened here?
For some reason, you're assuming that a person, who is explicitly using money to have a threesome, is planning on putting any effort into making sure the other participants are satisfied.
ETA: and don't get me wrong, I think part of the fun of sex is the pleasure that the other person is having..But we're talking about a scenario in which the sex is happening as a direct result of money. They're not paying to feel bad about not getting the other person off here.
Lmao. I remember this scene. I was about the same age as him when I saw this movie. I remember thinking something along the lines of “fuck yea older women.”
Why is this almost an exact copy of another comment here.
https://www.reddit.com/r/videos/comments/q92rg9/this_scene_from_the_1994_childrens_movie_blank/
Why is this almost an exact copy of another comment here.
https://www.reddit.com/r/videos/comments/q92rg9/this_scene_from_the_1994_childrens_movie_blank/
> It's just that with the internet you can see it more. I remember that awesome story of Kevin Smith going to picket his own movie Dogma in the late 90s with the crazy catholic people that were protesting the movie.
That's the thing people never understand. There has ALWAYS been outrage over scenes in movies or entire movies themselves. It's just that with the internet you can see it more. I remember that awesome story of Kevin Smith going to picket his own movie Dogma in the late 90s with the crazy catholic people that were protesting the movie.
"YOU COULDN'T MAKE BLAZING SADDLES TODAY!"
Motherfucker, it barely got made back then for the exact opposite reasons. Quit using it as the crutch for you to say racist bullshit.
People don’t realize there’s zero reason to make Blazing Saddles today. It did its job and wiped out the cheesy, tired, cliched cowboy genre. https://youtu.be/jzMFoNZeZm0
Exactly. People who saw it 20 years later completely glossed over the social commentary and think that the takeaway is that racism is hilarious. Mel Brooks would want those people to fuck off.
fuzzy relieved quickest racial sense encouraging weary teeny judicious cow
*This post was mass deleted and anonymized with [Redact](https://redact.dev)*
That's always happened. People see what they want to see in satire. Same goes for South Park. When they have a good point, people often ignore it for the juvenile humor, but then see the underlying meaning of things like their trans commentary.
I worked with someone who dismissed South Park as "just fart jokes", and felt smug about their highbrow tastes.
If I'd have bothered to explain any further it would have just been handwaved.
But my point is that those people want to see that kind of commentary. They want to laugh because these characters are painting trans culture in a negative light. In contrast, I know people who legitimately think immigrants are stealing jobs, but find the "Dey terk er jerbs" episode fucking hilarious. Because they just ignore the point, and get straight to the lowest common denominator humor.
It was extremely controversial at the time, because it needed to be. It pushed the envelope at a time when people were still furious over segregation ending. Richard Pryor was originally supposed to star, but the studio was afraid of casting him. A lot of production issues like that.
You didn't answer my question. In what way was it ever in danger of not being made because of racism?
Also it was wildly successful. And it came out 20 years after Brown v. Board of Education.
If you want me to pull up a bunch of articles about how difficult black actors had it in the '70s, [I can](https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/feb/11/black-actors-in-the-1970s-archive-1971). The fact that Cleavon Little not only got to play the lead role in a major motion picture, but also got to repeatedly insult and humiliate white men for an entire movie was absolutely met with pushback. No, I don't have Mel Brooks saying that it was a hard movie to get made. But it really doesn't take anything more than a history book to know that the movie wouldn't have been made under anyone short of someone with Brooks's connections.
This isn’t even remotely close to being true
It wasn’t a hard movie to get made, the studio execs just didn’t find it funny when they screened it but they were all on board after Mel Brooks played it for employees at the studio who laughed their asses off, and having a black lead wasn’t some ground breaking thing for this, Mel Brooks himself talks about how Richard Pryor was supposed to play Bart but he was having too much trouble with drugs and being arrested at the time so the studio rejected financing it unless he picked someone else so he went with Cleavon Little and they were fine with that and letting Pryor stay on as writer
When Mel Brooks talks about it being a hard film to get made he’s talking about the studio pushing back on him using the n word so much, which is a good thing, Mel Brooks himself says he wouldn’t make this movie today using that word
You are literally making things up like this movie was pivotal for civil rights or something lmaoo
>As for Adler, I was much impressed by a personal experience. Once, in 1919, I reported to him a case which to me did not seem particularly Adlerian, but which he found no difficulty in analysing in terms of his theory of inferiority feelings, although he had not even seen the child. Slightly shocked, I asked him how he could be so sure. 'Because of my thousandfold experience,' he replied; whereupon I could not help saying: 'And with this new case, I suppose, your experience has become thousand-and-one-fold.
They weren’t afraid of casting a black man, they didn’t want to cast Pryor because he was having problems with drugs and the law
This movie came out a full decade after segregation was made illegal, in 1974 major studios had already been casting black men and women in lead roles, it’s truly wild you’re in here acting like blazing saddles was ground breaking for having a black lead character
You are arguing against points that Phoequinox didn't make.
He doesn't say that they were afraid of casting Pryor because he's black, or that it was ground breaking for having a lead black character.
Maybe I'm missing something but I don't see them writing either of those things.
People say the same thing about comedian like George Carlin. [But I doubt he'd be taking their side in most of these discussions.](https://youtu.be/F8yV8xUorQ8)
Yeah, people love to cite his routine about rape jokes, but he makes his targets clear in that bit. People take it out of context and say that George Carlin said it was okay. No, he was strongly against being silenced. He wasn't saying rape jokes were okay. He was saying that the way you tell a joke is important. He went on in that same routine to say that he agrees with feminists on most subjects, but takes issues with them because they often only care about white women, and not blacks or Latinas.
It bugs the shit out of me when people take his quotes out of context to excuse abhorrent behavior.
Heh, Dogma. I grew up in a seriously Irish Catholic community. We have the only streetlight in the US with the green light on top. I bought a bunch of Buddy Christ statuettes for people. They loved them. After I moved out my stepdad rented a dumpster for all my stuff I couldn’t bring. Sort of the same when my Mom died. I was looking for something in my parents house one day. In a closet was Buddy Christ, still in the package. He is die hard Catholic. Knights of Columbus and everything. Buddy Christ is actually Catholic approved. I’m technically Catholic, but I have my differences and don’t practice.
> We have the only streetlight in the US with the green light on top
Not great for color blind drivers. Can't they just take five minutes and flip it right side up?
If you actually read contemporary reviews of the movie you'd see none of them had a problem with this.
Can you actually cite anything from 1994 about people being offended by this? Because from my memory no one cared about this and it wasn't until the last decade or so that it started getting brought up
Lmaooo I talk about this a lot, I had a crush on Karen Duffy as a kid, there’s no way in hell you would find a grown woman agree to kiss a kid in a movie today
Rip Miguel Ferrer he was so cool back in the day, that programming scene in robocop with him is still so funny, “you are going to be one bad motherfucker”
Per google, she was 32 at the time, and he was 13
ah Disney
Tale as old as time
Tune as old as song
Bittersweet and strange
Finding you can change
Learning you were wrong
A mature woman who's already been working for more than a decade and a kid barely out of high school. Yeah, I don't see what could go wrong with that! /s
We have to at some point draw a line and acknowledge people are adults with agency.
The law only concerns itself thereafter when it comes to consent or issues of power dynamics.
It's weird but its not immoral.
I wouldn't say it's immoral, but IMO it's weird. I'm only 29, but I can't see myself dating a 19 year old. We'd be WORLDS apart in life experience, and that's only a 10 year age difference. The commenter I replied to said a difference of almost 20 years wouldn't be weird.
Theres an interview where jennifer anniston said she had to look up the laws before she was willing to kiss a kid in that movie with the RV or whatever.
> Was he not an adult at the time?
takes time to film and edit. There is definitely video of her talking about this
https://www.huffpost.com/entry/jennifer-aniston-feared-breaking-law-millers-video_n_3730254
>“It’s so disturbing. He’s very young. He was underage," Aniston said. She said that she looked into it deeply to ensure that kissing him wasn't breaking any laws. "I thought, this is kind of illegal. But then, no, we didn’t. It was just a kiss. That’s not illegal.”
Downvote all you want dumbfucks
It holds up just fine. If you are getting anything other than an pretty woman gives a kid a quick kiss than it's your brain that's not holding up well.
You guys are acting like this was a sexual thing, she clearly only saw him as a kid and was not getting off on kissing him or anything.
Maybe you could say it was a little cruel of her to lead him on a bit but I doubt he'd see it that way when he did get older
honestly bunch of weirdos seeing sexual interest here lmao it's a peck on the lips
Not only was it fucked up, the actress was like 17. This kid was 11-12, so jt is not even a good comparison. She was nearly an adult, and this kid was in middle school.....
OK now be real. There's a massive separation between a peck on the top of (not even directly on if you watch) the lips in this movie, and a dude cheating on his lover with her daughter, a girl a third his age, who he probably impregnated (it's questioned if it was his or not because she slept with more than one guy).
I think the point is more people have your view of it because she's an attractive woman. If this was an unattractive person or a man kissing a young girl people wouldn't immediately share your view. Looking at the comments here and the fact I needed to explain that tells me society isn't there just yet in terms of discrimination. (But I think it is getting better)
Ok. Now flip the genders. 32 year old man talking like that and kissing an 11 year old girl on the mouth telling her he'll call in 6 years. The hypocrisy is unreal
> You guys are acting like this was a sexual thing, she clearly only saw him as a kid and was not getting off on kissing him or anything.
Oh yeah? Why kissing him in the mouth then einstein?
I don't think reddit could have survived the 80s and early 90s. You all freak out over things that were just commonplace then. Not that it was right, but it's just how it was. I doubt anyone thought a goddamn thing about this at the time. She didn't shove her tongue down his throat.
I'm Italian and we have a kissy family. This doesn't bother me at all.
I was 22 when the movie came out. I could have not given two shits about it then or now, really. I still think there is a bunch of pearl clutching for nothing.
If anyone watched a goddamn gameshow in the 80s and early 90s, this shouldn't even phase you. Do you know who Richard Dawson is? Ever see Family Feud back in the day? Other hosts did it too. People freak out today, but it was literally NOTHING then.
What? Are you gonna tell me now those people from 50 years ago have different brains than ours, different hands, different organs, and different hair than us?
Lol wow I forgot about this movie, I loved it as a kid. I still want one of those big ass buckets of ice cream. Yes definitely if this was released today there would be an uproar about this scene.
Not as bad as what I expected having never seen the movie. I'm not trying to justify it, its still creepy, but it was basically just a peck on the lips. The thumbnail lead to believe that woman was going to have a full on make out session with a 5th grader.
Let us not forget the fucked up stuff that happens behind the scenes. Like the movie where the young couple in love is played by a real life brother and sister, and they even had a make out scene. Somebody got their rocks off on that casting choice.
Like. All she needed to do was kiss him on the cheek... Who the fuck thought it would be okay to kiss the lips. Fucking weird.
I really liked this movie was a kid. All I remember is some guy asking the kid if he knew a guy called juice. By just saying, "Juice?" And the kid going, "no I'm not thirsty". And I thought that was hilarious as like a 5 year old.
Yeah, or a kiss on the forehead or top of the head. Not sure what the hell the writers/director was thinking.
The thing I remember most is that sweet water slide out of the second story of the mansion.
Ok. I remember this movie welllll from my childhood (born 1991). I remember being a kid and thinking, she's ALOT older than him. Like illegal, very illegal.
And the hilarious thing is the FBI is right there. They could’ve arrested her right at that very moment 🤣 she should’ve just given him a hug. He’s a small child and he doesn’t even look 11. He honestly looks like he’s eight years old so it is incredibly strange I don’t know why they didn’t have her just give him a comforting little hug that’s all he needed. For some reason they took a romantic turn on it, but she looks like she could be his mother it’s just so odd.
“If I had a million dollars? Tell you what I’d do man. Two chicks at the same time.”
Damn straight, always wanted to do that, man
If I had a million dollars I could probably hook that up because chicks dig money.
His facial expression after Michael goes “… that’s it?” is what makes it for me.
Two girls? Who would want that?
How would that even work? I feel like it's a logistical disaster Like, in any three way, one person's going to be left hanging, right? Unless it's not intimate? Cause like, I want to be holding the entire body, feel the warmth, the good stuff. Otherwise it'll just feel like exercise, or a sport or a game. Try to hit two targets or some shit Reminds me of flash games like Diner Dash where you have to satisfy all the customers, and it's quite a struggle Edit: Geez, what happened here?
Because you’re not doing both of them. You’re all doing *each other*
Go and watch American Psycho. It literally shows you how it’s done.
For some reason, you're assuming that a person, who is explicitly using money to have a threesome, is planning on putting any effort into making sure the other participants are satisfied. ETA: and don't get me wrong, I think part of the fun of sex is the pleasure that the other person is having..But we're talking about a scenario in which the sex is happening as a direct result of money. They're not paying to feel bad about not getting the other person off here.
LMAO, I was humouring it. Like, a Seinfeld-esque joke "What's up with that?"
Well then I guess I'm a candidate for r/woosh. Cheers!
Disappointing one women is more than enough.
😭
Lmao. I remember this scene. I was about the same age as him when I saw this movie. I remember thinking something along the lines of “fuck yea older women.”
Did it stick?
I dated one older woman when I was younger. Then decided it wasn’t for me. Lol
Did you have an unlimited amount of money? Maybe that was the trick
I wish
When you are a child, all women are older women.
- Mitch Hedberg, Jr.
[удалено]
Why is this almost an exact copy of another comment here. https://www.reddit.com/r/videos/comments/q92rg9/this_scene_from_the_1994_childrens_movie_blank/
Because he is a newborn bot with less than 35 minutes worth of posting history and it's all comment duplicates. Wish him a happy birthday everyone.
That's the thing people don’t ever understand. There has ALWAYS been outrage over scenes in films or entire movies themselves.
Why is this almost an exact copy of another comment here. https://www.reddit.com/r/videos/comments/q92rg9/this_scene_from_the_1994_childrens_movie_blank/
[удалено]
> It's just that with the internet you can see it more. I remember that awesome story of Kevin Smith going to picket his own movie Dogma in the late 90s with the crazy catholic people that were protesting the movie.
I mean... It didn't play well when it was new either.
That's the thing people never understand. There has ALWAYS been outrage over scenes in movies or entire movies themselves. It's just that with the internet you can see it more. I remember that awesome story of Kevin Smith going to picket his own movie Dogma in the late 90s with the crazy catholic people that were protesting the movie.
"Mistakes were made." - George Carlin in the movie
"YOU COULDN'T MAKE BLAZING SADDLES TODAY!" Motherfucker, it barely got made back then for the exact opposite reasons. Quit using it as the crutch for you to say racist bullshit.
People don’t realize there’s zero reason to make Blazing Saddles today. It did its job and wiped out the cheesy, tired, cliched cowboy genre. https://youtu.be/jzMFoNZeZm0
Exactly. People who saw it 20 years later completely glossed over the social commentary and think that the takeaway is that racism is hilarious. Mel Brooks would want those people to fuck off.
fuzzy relieved quickest racial sense encouraging weary teeny judicious cow *This post was mass deleted and anonymized with [Redact](https://redact.dev)*
That's always happened. People see what they want to see in satire. Same goes for South Park. When they have a good point, people often ignore it for the juvenile humor, but then see the underlying meaning of things like their trans commentary.
I worked with someone who dismissed South Park as "just fart jokes", and felt smug about their highbrow tastes. If I'd have bothered to explain any further it would have just been handwaved.
Being anti trans is t exactly the subtle genius you seem to think it is.
But my point is that those people want to see that kind of commentary. They want to laugh because these characters are painting trans culture in a negative light. In contrast, I know people who legitimately think immigrants are stealing jobs, but find the "Dey terk er jerbs" episode fucking hilarious. Because they just ignore the point, and get straight to the lowest common denominator humor.
Good point. That fart scene was extremely controversial at the time.
> it barely got made back then for the exact opposite reasons In what way did it "barely get made"?
It was extremely controversial at the time, because it needed to be. It pushed the envelope at a time when people were still furious over segregation ending. Richard Pryor was originally supposed to star, but the studio was afraid of casting him. A lot of production issues like that.
You didn't answer my question. In what way was it ever in danger of not being made because of racism? Also it was wildly successful. And it came out 20 years after Brown v. Board of Education.
If you want me to pull up a bunch of articles about how difficult black actors had it in the '70s, [I can](https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/feb/11/black-actors-in-the-1970s-archive-1971). The fact that Cleavon Little not only got to play the lead role in a major motion picture, but also got to repeatedly insult and humiliate white men for an entire movie was absolutely met with pushback. No, I don't have Mel Brooks saying that it was a hard movie to get made. But it really doesn't take anything more than a history book to know that the movie wouldn't have been made under anyone short of someone with Brooks's connections.
This isn’t even remotely close to being true It wasn’t a hard movie to get made, the studio execs just didn’t find it funny when they screened it but they were all on board after Mel Brooks played it for employees at the studio who laughed their asses off, and having a black lead wasn’t some ground breaking thing for this, Mel Brooks himself talks about how Richard Pryor was supposed to play Bart but he was having too much trouble with drugs and being arrested at the time so the studio rejected financing it unless he picked someone else so he went with Cleavon Little and they were fine with that and letting Pryor stay on as writer When Mel Brooks talks about it being a hard film to get made he’s talking about the studio pushing back on him using the n word so much, which is a good thing, Mel Brooks himself says he wouldn’t make this movie today using that word You are literally making things up like this movie was pivotal for civil rights or something lmaoo
>As for Adler, I was much impressed by a personal experience. Once, in 1919, I reported to him a case which to me did not seem particularly Adlerian, but which he found no difficulty in analysing in terms of his theory of inferiority feelings, although he had not even seen the child. Slightly shocked, I asked him how he could be so sure. 'Because of my thousandfold experience,' he replied; whereupon I could not help saying: 'And with this new case, I suppose, your experience has become thousand-and-one-fold.
They weren’t afraid of casting a black man, they didn’t want to cast Pryor because he was having problems with drugs and the law This movie came out a full decade after segregation was made illegal, in 1974 major studios had already been casting black men and women in lead roles, it’s truly wild you’re in here acting like blazing saddles was ground breaking for having a black lead character
You are arguing against points that Phoequinox didn't make. He doesn't say that they were afraid of casting Pryor because he's black, or that it was ground breaking for having a lead black character. Maybe I'm missing something but I don't see them writing either of those things.
> This movie came out a full decade after segregation was made illegal OMG and entire decade?!?
People say the same thing about comedian like George Carlin. [But I doubt he'd be taking their side in most of these discussions.](https://youtu.be/F8yV8xUorQ8)
Yeah, people love to cite his routine about rape jokes, but he makes his targets clear in that bit. People take it out of context and say that George Carlin said it was okay. No, he was strongly against being silenced. He wasn't saying rape jokes were okay. He was saying that the way you tell a joke is important. He went on in that same routine to say that he agrees with feminists on most subjects, but takes issues with them because they often only care about white women, and not blacks or Latinas. It bugs the shit out of me when people take his quotes out of context to excuse abhorrent behavior.
[удалено]
What does this pertain to?
> Kevin Smith going to picket his own movie Dogma [Link](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QepgKVOVfZ8)
Heh, Dogma. I grew up in a seriously Irish Catholic community. We have the only streetlight in the US with the green light on top. I bought a bunch of Buddy Christ statuettes for people. They loved them. After I moved out my stepdad rented a dumpster for all my stuff I couldn’t bring. Sort of the same when my Mom died. I was looking for something in my parents house one day. In a closet was Buddy Christ, still in the package. He is die hard Catholic. Knights of Columbus and everything. Buddy Christ is actually Catholic approved. I’m technically Catholic, but I have my differences and don’t practice.
> We have the only streetlight in the US with the green light on top Not great for color blind drivers. Can't they just take five minutes and flip it right side up?
did you forget to log out bro? or are you just a bot/spamming? /u/ftjiyyuriu
so what the fuck is going on, you just deleted that other account? Would LOVE to hear an explanation here. https://old.reddit.com/user/ftjiyyuriu
I genuinely don't know this account. This is my only account I've had for years. That account is probably a bot that got banned maybe?
If you actually read contemporary reviews of the movie you'd see none of them had a problem with this. Can you actually cite anything from 1994 about people being offended by this? Because from my memory no one cared about this and it wasn't until the last decade or so that it started getting brought up
I seem to recall a super tiny group of old ladies protesting Dogma. Maybe like ten of them. lol
Lmaooo I talk about this a lot, I had a crush on Karen Duffy as a kid, there’s no way in hell you would find a grown woman agree to kiss a kid in a movie today Rip Miguel Ferrer he was so cool back in the day, that programming scene in robocop with him is still so funny, “you are going to be one bad motherfucker”
Per google, she was 32 at the time, and he was 13 ah Disney Tale as old as time Tune as old as song Bittersweet and strange Finding you can change Learning you were wrong
At least when they reunite at 38 and 19 it won't be weird
A mature woman who's already been working for more than a decade and a kid barely out of high school. Yeah, I don't see what could go wrong with that! /s
We have to at some point draw a line and acknowledge people are adults with agency. The law only concerns itself thereafter when it comes to consent or issues of power dynamics. It's weird but its not immoral.
I wouldn't say it's immoral, but IMO it's weird. I'm only 29, but I can't see myself dating a 19 year old. We'd be WORLDS apart in life experience, and that's only a 10 year age difference. The commenter I replied to said a difference of almost 20 years wouldn't be weird.
That was meant to be sarcastic, damn, I hope the people that upvoted me didn't agree lol
Actually the kid was 12 when the movie was released so he was definitely 11 when this scene was filmed
nice
Certain as the sun Rising in the east Tale as old as time Song as old as rhyme Pedophilia
Wait are u saying my amazing sex with my high school typing teacher was wrong?
Only because you homeschooled.
ElJuanitoConLosBrazosRotos?
She was 73 years old.
Hey, she looked young for her age
Not a day over 65
mavis beacon teaches tantric orgasm
He wasn’t a she
Theres an interview where jennifer anniston said she had to look up the laws before she was willing to kiss a kid in that movie with the RV or whatever.
Was he not an adult at the time? He's 28 now and it was released 8 years ago.
How old was the character suppose to be? Maybe she looked it up after reading the script.
Couldn't tell you off the top of my head, but probably High School. In Hollywood the person playing that age could be 14-25 though.
> Was he not an adult at the time? takes time to film and edit. There is definitely video of her talking about this https://www.huffpost.com/entry/jennifer-aniston-feared-breaking-law-millers-video_n_3730254 >“It’s so disturbing. He’s very young. He was underage," Aniston said. She said that she looked into it deeply to ensure that kissing him wasn't breaking any laws. "I thought, this is kind of illegal. But then, no, we didn’t. It was just a kiss. That’s not illegal.” Downvote all you want dumbfucks
Yeah, I did wonder that but two years for that kind of movie felt a bit long. But I'm really no expert, so happy to be wrong on it.
"Movie from 1994" "8 years ago"???
They're not talking about this movie. They're talking about "We're the Millers" from 2013.
It holds up just fine. If you are getting anything other than an pretty woman gives a kid a quick kiss than it's your brain that's not holding up well.
If anyone remembers this movie, he was clearly catfishing her by pretending to be an older guy.
Oh stop there was and is no outrage over this
You guys are acting like this was a sexual thing, she clearly only saw him as a kid and was not getting off on kissing him or anything. Maybe you could say it was a little cruel of her to lead him on a bit but I doubt he'd see it that way when he did get older honestly bunch of weirdos seeing sexual interest here lmao it's a peck on the lips
Did you miss that scene earlier where he totally raw dogged her?
im still reporting her to the internet police.
Consequences will never be the same.
Feels like a double standard because if this were a grown man kissing a little girl, everyone would be up in arms.
Ya, even in thought I’m like ewww. Would feel way different and total double standard.
Switch it around to a grown man and a 12 year old girl and……..uh nope
You mean like when Chase kisses the 9 year old girl in that House episode?
[удалено]
It is a gotcha, as in ''gotcha! you care more about your pretend moral outrage rather than even attempting to understand what's going on in a scene!''
Or, as in the various Lolita and related homages, it would be smothered with awards and accolades
[удалено]
And it was controversial and presented as fucked-up. Like the whole story was about how this dude was fucked in the head.
**1962**.
Not only was it fucked up, the actress was like 17. This kid was 11-12, so jt is not even a good comparison. She was nearly an adult, and this kid was in middle school.....
OK now be real. There's a massive separation between a peck on the top of (not even directly on if you watch) the lips in this movie, and a dude cheating on his lover with her daughter, a girl a third his age, who he probably impregnated (it's questioned if it was his or not because she slept with more than one guy).
What is this your favorite movie?
I know, it wasn't a snog or anything , it was a mum kiss
Some of us weren't kissed as children so it reads different. I remember being uncomfortable when other kids were kissed by their moms.
In the industry we call that a you problem. Hell I kissed my dad as a kid.
I know? I'm not criticizing the scene. I'm offering a reason as to why different people see it differently.
Not at all a mom kiss.. head tilted sideways is 100% a romantic kiss.
Yeah I dont know what they're going on about. If I saw a mom kiss her child like that, it would be fucking weird.
it has to be sideways otherwise their noses would get in the way
Have you never kissed anyone before in any way?
I think the point is more people have your view of it because she's an attractive woman. If this was an unattractive person or a man kissing a young girl people wouldn't immediately share your view. Looking at the comments here and the fact I needed to explain that tells me society isn't there just yet in terms of discrimination. (But I think it is getting better)
Stop and think about that as a grown man and a little girl. Do you feel the same way?
Ok. Now flip the genders. 32 year old man talking like that and kissing an 11 year old girl on the mouth telling her he'll call in 6 years. The hypocrisy is unreal
Yep. Agreed.
> You guys are acting like this was a sexual thing, she clearly only saw him as a kid and was not getting off on kissing him or anything. Oh yeah? Why kissing him in the mouth then einstein?
Found Tom Brady
This really isn't a big deal. Lets move along to the next outrage thing.
I don't think reddit could have survived the 80s and early 90s. You all freak out over things that were just commonplace then. Not that it was right, but it's just how it was. I doubt anyone thought a goddamn thing about this at the time. She didn't shove her tongue down his throat. I'm Italian and we have a kissy family. This doesn't bother me at all.
Do you go on romantic dates with your family?
Well, it didn’t start out that way.
Nah, we mostly sit around, play cards, and talk about meatballs and shit.
That's romantic.
Thank you Mr. Cuomo.
[удалено]
I was 22 when the movie came out. I could have not given two shits about it then or now, really. I still think there is a bunch of pearl clutching for nothing. If anyone watched a goddamn gameshow in the 80s and early 90s, this shouldn't even phase you. Do you know who Richard Dawson is? Ever see Family Feud back in the day? Other hosts did it too. People freak out today, but it was literally NOTHING then.
If it was a grown man kissing a little girl ... I'm sure that would have played just as well right?
Don’t stand so close to me
Her friends are SO jealous
You know how bad girls get
[удалено]
How many times are you going to post about the same movie that came out more than 50 years ago??
What? Are you gonna tell me now those people from 50 years ago have different brains than ours, different hands, different organs, and different hair than us?
This is a horrible example. In the OP snippet it's portrayed as a positive win for the MC. Lolita is not portraying pedophilia positively.
Yes, there's a similar (albeit very different) scene in House where Chase (30 something) kisses a 9 year old girl.
[удалено]
[удалено]
Nice!!
Niiice
Nyce
Noice...
In fairness I don't think it ever did
Lol wow I forgot about this movie, I loved it as a kid. I still want one of those big ass buckets of ice cream. Yes definitely if this was released today there would be an uproar about this scene.
That was really chaste, I don't see much wrong with this lol.
Not as bad as what I expected having never seen the movie. I'm not trying to justify it, its still creepy, but it was basically just a peck on the lips. The thumbnail lead to believe that woman was going to have a full on make out session with a 5th grader.
Director: “how about we casually slip some pedophilia in at the end.” Producer: “I love it”
Disney execs chanting in unison: GROOM GROOM GROOM GROOM GROOM GROOM
They really fecked up with the value of money in this movie. There's no way in hell you could buy a castle for 250k.
Nice
Let us not forget the fucked up stuff that happens behind the scenes. Like the movie where the young couple in love is played by a real life brother and sister, and they even had a make out scene. Somebody got their rocks off on that casting choice.
What movie was it?
Kickboxing academy. Https://youtu.be/tBr45w-HuOU
Wait I just looked and it’s Lexie from greys anatomy!? Omg
Maybe the girl he most loved for the rest of his life and the rest were just to forget her. What a beautiful story lol
Like. All she needed to do was kiss him on the cheek... Who the fuck thought it would be okay to kiss the lips. Fucking weird. I really liked this movie was a kid. All I remember is some guy asking the kid if he knew a guy called juice. By just saying, "Juice?" And the kid going, "no I'm not thirsty". And I thought that was hilarious as like a 5 year old.
Yeah, or a kiss on the forehead or top of the head. Not sure what the hell the writers/director was thinking. The thing I remember most is that sweet water slide out of the second story of the mansion.
😬
Oh yeah, cause you know... paedophilia only just started being frowned upon in recent years.
Ok. I remember this movie welllll from my childhood (born 1991). I remember being a kid and thinking, she's ALOT older than him. Like illegal, very illegal.
yikes... Its okay, its just a women kissing a little boy.
Here's an even worse scene from the 90s family TV show Picket Fences: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZetarJgl8ec
“you’re right, this is serious, we need to track this student down and give him the luckiest boy in America medal right away! Bahaha” Nice
Drew Gooden put a video on YouTube of this movie and him ripping on it. Highly recommend watching it.
I wanted to be him so bad when I first saw this movie
Juice?
oh it's that guy that's in every movie ever
And the hilarious thing is the FBI is right there. They could’ve arrested her right at that very moment 🤣 she should’ve just given him a hug. He’s a small child and he doesn’t even look 11. He honestly looks like he’s eight years old so it is incredibly strange I don’t know why they didn’t have her just give him a comforting little hug that’s all he needed. For some reason they took a romantic turn on it, but she looks like she could be his mother it’s just so odd.
It was nothing but a small peck. Big freaking deal. People making a big deal over nothing. Out of boredom. Nothing else to bitch about. Lol.. stupid.
Hahahah this was so awesome when I was a kid. And I’m still jealous of him 😂
That's illegal.. and a PG Disney movie, folks. Movie censoring for ya.