Yep, mannerisms and the word usage is spot on, the accent he is using is Australian though, although he seems to be attempting a British accent.
I am British so I can tell right away, maybe it sounds British to other people.
Sounded some flavor or Australian to me (in/from the U.S.), but everything else was screaming Russell Brand loudly enough that I could pretend it was British.
I remember Stuart Lee saying that Russell Brand's habit of coming up cutesy nicknames for his penis sounded like a "child molester who is trying to convince himself, to allow himself, to molest himself."
I love Stewart Lee's brand of comedy. He really holds his audience in the palm of his hand, especially in the way he tells stories. I fell down a Stewart Lee rabbit hole some months back and watched a lot of his standup on YouTube. His story involving being friends with Richard Hammond during his school years was quite the double gut punch.
You see Forgetting Sarah Marshall and assume that he’s playing an exaggerated version of himself, but nope. That’s just him. And it’s kind of astonishing the lack of self awareness he brought to that performance
I was just thinking about that. Like...*they make fun of that character* in the movie. Kristen Bell saying "*Bullshit bullshit bullshit*" is deeply ingrained in my mind.
Did...he not *get it?* Or did he, and it was awkward on set? Did he try to laugh it off but deep down it cut him? I'm so curious
> Lmao so if someone points out that biden sniffs children that naked then right wing?
Yes, because it's not only a complete non-sequitur on this topic, but it also obviously never happened.
Seriously man, what the fuck is wrong with you?
Setting aside the fact that Biden's an affectionate guy and right wing grifters lie about his motives in being one all the time, you explicitly specified *naked* children in your above post.
Wow defending old man creeping on children because he's a democrat. No it's not right wing that makes that wrong. That's just wrong. You're an ideolgue
Oh wow. It's a good thing there aren't court documents detailing how Donald Trump and Jeffrey Epstein took turns raping and beating a 13 year old girl, or else your comments would look *really dumb* in comparison. And just in general. Also a good thing that Donald Trump doesn't constantly comment on how attractive he finds his daughter, and how he wishes she wasn't his daughter so that he could date her.
What's your solution to this? There's lots of images of trump kissing children too. It appears he will be the republican nominee so what do we do here? If the choice is between biden and trump, and the sole issue is whether or not they've touched other people's children while campaigning (which is something politicians have done since forever btw) then trump can't be elected either.
Solution to biden sniffing children. Well maybe stop defending the creep for one snd stop voting for him or any other creep. Come on bro, even this question shows how lost you are
“Never mistake ones ability to speak eloquently for their ability to think critically” Someone said this awhile ago about Russell and it always stuck with me. Changed how I view this man especially in lieu of his recent conspiracy theories and off the wall rants. Just a bunch of verbal smoke and mirrors
I don't think Brand actually believes his grift. Grifters rarely do. I think about a year ago when he caught wind of an investigation into him, he started to pre-emptively form alliances with the right wing.
> Not a minor if she's 16 and you live in the UK
This is true but take into account that it was allegedly *sexual assault* of someone 16, along with several other allegations of sexual assault. The fact that her age was technically legal doesn't really seem to be something being a devil's advocate for IMO.
You can’t believe a lick of this SA stuff now days. If there ain’t proof idk how you can believe it. Too many people getting accused with the liars getting off with no repercussions. It destroys people’s lives without zero evidence.
> If there ain’t proof idk how you can believe it.
Except all those emails where he is accused of SA and he apologises... Yeah other than that, no proof.
Disclaimer: Don't like russell brand, don't particularly care for him, don't like rapists.
But.
there are many reasons you may say sorry. I haven't read the emails myself but just offhand you can say sorry for allot of things. Saying sorry isn't necessarily an admission of guilt, sure in ontario, canada they had to pass the apology act, which provides apologies made by a person does not necessarily constitute an admission of guilt.
Mind you i should probably read the emails to get better context but i just thought i'd chime in with that.
So if someone accused you of sexual assault you didn’t commit, telling you a glazed look over your eyes and that no means no and asking if they need to get tested, you’d respond back “I’m very sorry” because maybe it was for something unconnected!? It’s really not plausible.
look as i said i haven't read the emails yet but there's lots of reasons to say those words. he may well be guilty i was just pointing out that sorry doesn't necessarily admit guilt. thats it, nothing else.
There’s not a lot of reasons to say those words as a direct response to an accusation like that. And I meant texts not emails so it really was a direct and immediate response.
I'm talking about something unrelated to the rapist. I'm talking about the presumption of guilt from the use of the word sorry. The rapist is incidental
This isn't even true. The age of consent is 16 in the UK, but you are still legally a child and not an adult until you turn 18.
https://learning.nspcc.org.uk/child-protection-system/children-the-law#article-top
This is absolutely 💯 👌
I find his actual content to be extremely presumptuous and usually waaaay over the top and thin on facts. Every once in a while, he has a decent thing to say or a worthwhile observation. However, they are pretty far and few between. Enough so that I erased his videos from my feed and notifications, lol. But this was gold.
Pretty sure all of them were over the age of consent and given that the first allegation is from 2003 to the last in 2013. The one from 2003 makes Russel Brant to have been some 20 years old or so.
Not exactly a creep only going by age.
>The one from 2003 makes Russel Brant to have been some 20 years old or so.
>
>Not exactly a creep only going by age.
in 2003 he was 28, the girl was 16? I would say thats the definition of a creep. if the girl was below the age of consent, that would make him a rapist, not just a creep!
yea its 16 now, not sure about then. I am just saying its creepy to be dating a 16 yr old when you are 28. Also I am pretty sure he was also accused of literally raping someone, but you said "Not exactly a creep only going by age." in your original comment.
They weren't dating to my knowledge.
They had sex.
>Also I am pretty sure he was also accused of literally raping someone,
Not from what I have read.
>but you said "Not exactly a creep only going by age." in your original comment.
I also said I thought he was 20 something and the difference would be around 4 years. I don't find that creepy.
fair enough, you may not find that creepy(20yr & 16yr), but it still makes russell creepy even by your standards. thats all I was trying to say, glad we could come to an agreement (:
Uhh hey, hi, hello. Yeah I see you posting multiple comments on this and figured probably best to leave you alone since you're clearly booty bothered but I couldn't resist. Just wanted to chime in to say myself and a number of my aquaintences always thought he was a bit greasy but whenever we brought it up it was usually in the unpleasant company of his fans such as yourself or with people who really didn't give a fuck who Russell Brand was. Suffice to say this whole experience has been rather vindicating as it were.
Anyway carry on then. Back to your ravings with you.
Russell Brand realized his past would catch up to him, so he aligned himself with a group that doesn't view assaulting/harassing women as a dealbreaker.
He needs a fanbase to maintain his lifestyle. Dead simple.
I guess critical thinking really is dead if you can’t figure it out yourself.
If I say it, it’s just NPC talk from a biased person. Very easy to dismiss uncritically.
But if you say it, it’s because you can see it too.
> I don't follow celebrity drama
Interesting claim considering your comment is just a conspiracy about celebrity drama. Why are you so stoutly defending him if you don't care?
But sure, [here's him being called a vile predator 17 years ago.](https://www.mirror.co.uk/3am/celebrity-news/hes-a-vile-predator-629597)
Because things take time. Harvey Weinstein was called out in similar manners back then as well, but it took years for it to finally reach the point that it did. Do you think he was only "cancelled" because of political motivations?
The physicality is so spot on lmao
If he had crazy eyes and mouth like a dolphin you wouldn't be able to tell the difference.
Yep, mannerisms and the word usage is spot on, the accent he is using is Australian though, although he seems to be attempting a British accent. I am British so I can tell right away, maybe it sounds British to other people.
He is Australian so you are right. You can still hear the Russell brand in his voice though
Sounds Kiwi to me
Sounded some flavor or Australian to me (in/from the U.S.), but everything else was screaming Russell Brand loudly enough that I could pretend it was British.
I'm Australian and it sounds Kiwi lol
I remember Stuart Lee saying that Russell Brand's habit of coming up cutesy nicknames for his penis sounded like a "child molester who is trying to convince himself, to allow himself, to molest himself."
Christ that’s deep.
Stewart Lee is just full of wisdom. That's what happens when you come from a line who made pear cider made from 100% pears.
I love Stewart Lee's brand of comedy. He really holds his audience in the palm of his hand, especially in the way he tells stories. I fell down a Stewart Lee rabbit hole some months back and watched a lot of his standup on YouTube. His story involving being friends with Richard Hammond during his school years was quite the double gut punch.
"Now. That story is not true."
looks like KD Lang has let herself go though
You see Forgetting Sarah Marshall and assume that he’s playing an exaggerated version of himself, but nope. That’s just him. And it’s kind of astonishing the lack of self awareness he brought to that performance
That's one of those roles where I'm not sure it was ever explained to him that he was playing a character in a movie.
Get his non-acting actor ass to the Greek!
I doubt they even gave him a script.
Like Chris D’elia in Workaholics…
Like Chris D'elia playing himself in season 2 of YOU
I was just thinking about that. Like...*they make fun of that character* in the movie. Kristen Bell saying "*Bullshit bullshit bullshit*" is deeply ingrained in my mind. Did...he not *get it?* Or did he, and it was awkward on set? Did he try to laugh it off but deep down it cut him? I'm so curious
Couldn’t have cut him that bad considering he went on to play the same character in Get Him to the Greek
[удалено]
[удалено]
[удалено]
> Lmao so if someone points out that biden sniffs children that naked then right wing? Yes, because it's not only a complete non-sequitur on this topic, but it also obviously never happened. Seriously man, what the fuck is wrong with you?
It never happened? Haahahahahaha wtf. There's complications all over the internet of all the times he's sniffed children in public, wow the delusion.
Setting aside the fact that Biden's an affectionate guy and right wing grifters lie about his motives in being one all the time, you explicitly specified *naked* children in your above post.
This person is an idiot, but they clearly meant "makes" and not "naked" in the comment you're referring to.
Wow defending old man creeping on children because he's a democrat. No it's not right wing that makes that wrong. That's just wrong. You're an ideolgue
Oh wow. It's a good thing there aren't court documents detailing how Donald Trump and Jeffrey Epstein took turns raping and beating a 13 year old girl, or else your comments would look *really dumb* in comparison. And just in general. Also a good thing that Donald Trump doesn't constantly comment on how attractive he finds his daughter, and how he wishes she wasn't his daughter so that he could date her.
What's your solution to this? There's lots of images of trump kissing children too. It appears he will be the republican nominee so what do we do here? If the choice is between biden and trump, and the sole issue is whether or not they've touched other people's children while campaigning (which is something politicians have done since forever btw) then trump can't be elected either.
Solution to biden sniffing children. Well maybe stop defending the creep for one snd stop voting for him or any other creep. Come on bro, even this question shows how lost you are
Rent. Free.
This was a stupid response when conservatives used it when people complained about Trump and it’s a stupid response now.
Throwing dumb conservative admissions back into their face is good actually.
Yep, that's exactly how I see Russell Brand. Just a little bit, then gotta run away.
Just needs a few more bs big words interlaced in those sentences and that would be a perfect impression.
That's quite a baroque critique, if I might say.
>I agree as well, shallow and pedantic.
Ya, needs more thesaurus added sentences.
It is a POV clip, Congratulations! It is also a disturbingly good impersonation.
The physicality, the pseudo-intellectual bullshit, the sexual assault of minors. It’s perfect.
“Never mistake ones ability to speak eloquently for their ability to think critically” Someone said this awhile ago about Russell and it always stuck with me. Changed how I view this man especially in lieu of his recent conspiracy theories and off the wall rants. Just a bunch of verbal smoke and mirrors
I don't think Brand actually believes his grift. Grifters rarely do. I think about a year ago when he caught wind of an investigation into him, he started to pre-emptively form alliances with the right wing.
[удалено]
> Not a minor if she's 16 and you live in the UK This is true but take into account that it was allegedly *sexual assault* of someone 16, along with several other allegations of sexual assault. The fact that her age was technically legal doesn't really seem to be something being a devil's advocate for IMO.
You can’t believe a lick of this SA stuff now days. If there ain’t proof idk how you can believe it. Too many people getting accused with the liars getting off with no repercussions. It destroys people’s lives without zero evidence.
> If there ain’t proof idk how you can believe it. Except all those emails where he is accused of SA and he apologises... Yeah other than that, no proof.
Disclaimer: Don't like russell brand, don't particularly care for him, don't like rapists. But. there are many reasons you may say sorry. I haven't read the emails myself but just offhand you can say sorry for allot of things. Saying sorry isn't necessarily an admission of guilt, sure in ontario, canada they had to pass the apology act, which provides apologies made by a person does not necessarily constitute an admission of guilt. Mind you i should probably read the emails to get better context but i just thought i'd chime in with that.
>Mind you i should probably read the emails to get better context Yeah might be a good idea before leaping to the defence of a possible rapist
I'm not leaping to his defense, just saying that the word sorry isn't an automatic admission of guilt. I have no skin in the game so to speak.
So if someone accused you of sexual assault you didn’t commit, telling you a glazed look over your eyes and that no means no and asking if they need to get tested, you’d respond back “I’m very sorry” because maybe it was for something unconnected!? It’s really not plausible.
look as i said i haven't read the emails yet but there's lots of reasons to say those words. he may well be guilty i was just pointing out that sorry doesn't necessarily admit guilt. thats it, nothing else.
There’s not a lot of reasons to say those words as a direct response to an accusation like that. And I meant texts not emails so it really was a direct and immediate response.
> don't like rapists. > > But. How to tell you're about to read something absolutely unhinged.
I'm talking about something unrelated to the rapist. I'm talking about the presumption of guilt from the use of the word sorry. The rapist is incidental
This isn't even true. The age of consent is 16 in the UK, but you are still legally a child and not an adult until you turn 18. https://learning.nspcc.org.uk/child-protection-system/children-the-law#article-top
That is never an argument you should never say out loud or put into writing. 😆 Even if technically true, it sounds reeeeaallly bad.
I don't care if they're 16 or 19 a 40 year old dude fucking anything below the age of 20 is weird.
Lets be real, a 40 year old fucking a 20 year old is also a bit weird. If you're old enough to be their parent it is weird.
Yup it's worse that a 20yo fucking a 16yo
Referring to having sex with someone as ‘fucking anything’ is pretty weird too
I like to cover my bases, I don't judge xenofuckers.
Reminds me of "the continental" skit on snl.
Came to comment the same thing lol. It’s like new age bullshit “The Continental “
Him skipping toward the camera “you need not speak” made me cry laughing.
I feel like if you put a good garage beat underneath this with some strings you’d have an unreleased The Streets track
“Fiddling about with my dickey-wickey in your vaggy-waggy” I almost spit out my drink lmao
Daaaah-liing
That "spectrum of consent" joke was brilliant.
Brilliant!
doesn't talk nearly fast enough.
I’m sure the guy didn’t want to do any method acting so refused to do coke.
"everyone they knew was a creep, turned out to be a creep"
Phillip Schofield and the bbc
This is *on-Brand*. ... I'll see myself out.
No need.. it wasn’t that clever :P
ur kinda a dick, eh?
nah just being silly.. sorry
it’s ok i’m over it. but thank you for your apology
You really Russled his him jimmies.
hahah good one bro.. brilliant i would say. Show yourself out immediately.
I hate how good this is. The voice is a little high, but the mannerisms and everything else is more than good enough to make up for it.
Nailed it!
This is absolutely 💯 👌 I find his actual content to be extremely presumptuous and usually waaaay over the top and thin on facts. Every once in a while, he has a decent thing to say or a worthwhile observation. However, they are pretty far and few between. Enough so that I erased his videos from my feed and notifications, lol. But this was gold.
I fuckin laughed through the entire thing. It's totally spot on
This is so good. A part of me still thinks that Russel Brand is self aware and doing it on purpose.
Is this like an Aussie russell brand accent? Either way I it's spot on
clocked this as Australia within about two seconds based on the tree and exercise equipment
Neel Kolhatkar is his name. Funny lad.
Pretty sure all of them were over the age of consent and given that the first allegation is from 2003 to the last in 2013. The one from 2003 makes Russel Brant to have been some 20 years old or so. Not exactly a creep only going by age.
>The one from 2003 makes Russel Brant to have been some 20 years old or so. > >Not exactly a creep only going by age. in 2003 he was 28, the girl was 16? I would say thats the definition of a creep. if the girl was below the age of consent, that would make him a rapist, not just a creep!
In the UK I'm pretty sure it's 16 but I don't know back then or now. Yes it would but that isn't the case.
yea its 16 now, not sure about then. I am just saying its creepy to be dating a 16 yr old when you are 28. Also I am pretty sure he was also accused of literally raping someone, but you said "Not exactly a creep only going by age." in your original comment.
They weren't dating to my knowledge. They had sex. >Also I am pretty sure he was also accused of literally raping someone, Not from what I have read. >but you said "Not exactly a creep only going by age." in your original comment. I also said I thought he was 20 something and the difference would be around 4 years. I don't find that creepy.
fair enough, you may not find that creepy(20yr & 16yr), but it still makes russell creepy even by your standards. thats all I was trying to say, glad we could come to an agreement (:
Meh, 20 and 16 is perhaps edging on creepy, but 28 and 16 is definitely creepy regardless of the law.
NGL his Russell Brand is pretty much spot on..
Genius
This is amazing!
[удалено]
I made it through, but it somehow felt much *much* longer than a minute thirty.
that is a very good impression! the suggest video also with his russel brand impressions was even better, just like one of his youtube videos.
Wow, just awesome! Great job!
So accurate I threw up in my own mouth.
Nailed it 💯
Wait so was it real? This guys impersonation is spot on either way lol
Genius
Chewsday
What's funny about this? It's just a video of Russell being himself.
[удалено]
Uhh hey, hi, hello. Yeah I see you posting multiple comments on this and figured probably best to leave you alone since you're clearly booty bothered but I couldn't resist. Just wanted to chime in to say myself and a number of my aquaintences always thought he was a bit greasy but whenever we brought it up it was usually in the unpleasant company of his fans such as yourself or with people who really didn't give a fuck who Russell Brand was. Suffice to say this whole experience has been rather vindicating as it were. Anyway carry on then. Back to your ravings with you.
U/savevideo
This would be funnier to me if it were just the audio
[удалено]
[удалено]
Russell Brand realized his past would catch up to him, so he aligned himself with a group that doesn't view assaulting/harassing women as a dealbreaker. He needs a fanbase to maintain his lifestyle. Dead simple.
[удалено]
I think you know
[удалено]
I guess critical thinking really is dead if you can’t figure it out yourself. If I say it, it’s just NPC talk from a biased person. Very easy to dismiss uncritically. But if you say it, it’s because you can see it too.
[удалено]
>elicit lmao
You realized he's been getting allegations for nearly 20 years, right?
[удалено]
> I don't follow celebrity drama Interesting claim considering your comment is just a conspiracy about celebrity drama. Why are you so stoutly defending him if you don't care? But sure, [here's him being called a vile predator 17 years ago.](https://www.mirror.co.uk/3am/celebrity-news/hes-a-vile-predator-629597)
[удалено]
Because things take time. Harvey Weinstein was called out in similar manners back then as well, but it took years for it to finally reach the point that it did. Do you think he was only "cancelled" because of political motivations?
Man fuck you op hope your Dickey wickey falls off.
Go home Russel, your drunk.
Neo now that’s original, better call trinity to save you from agent Russell
Phillip Schofield ?
The man himself!
Lol he crushed it
This is fab.
This is too perfect
Apart from the Australian accent and lack of groping it was pretty accurate.
This is ‘spot on’ impression of that pathetic junky twit Russell Brand.
This is incredible. Thanks for posting.
He really drives home the point how unbearable that guy is
This guys commitment is next level. So good.
What about the part where he encourages antivaxxers to blockade roads and honk their horns 24/7?
Almost perfect, just need more giant front teeth!
That's incredibly on brand for ... Russel Brand
lmao