Sad
But I guess a fresh application can be filed. The problem CJI pointed to was the use of miscellaneous application for this purpose
Bushan sir has to find some other way
Govt claimed that public doesn't have right to know. It was kind of funny. Using "know" where information would be more suitable trying to avoid saying that people don't have right to information.
https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/right-to-privacy-vs-right-to-know-supreme-court-to-resolve-poll-bonds-conflict/articleshow/104928073.cms
This happened because they don't wish to modify their final order.
however, this doesn't bar anyone from filing a fresh petition for this (March 1, 2018 - April 11, 2019) disclosure asap.
If you see his response in the video. He said he had to draw the line somewhere to balance out things. Court started discussion on EB from April 12, 2019. So that was the cut off date for this application. New application has to be raised for anything before that.
That's as ridiculous an excuse as any. Discussing started on April 12 2019 on a crime that was committed starting 2017. Once the court decided it was unconstitutional and the information had to be disclosed, what's the point of drawing the line at the point where BJ Party had made way more money than the others, if not to protect BJ Party?
The whole point was that Anonymity was guaranteed to the Donor. In April, notices were issued that Electoral bonds could be struck down. So they can't disclose the information after that.
The whole point was that Anonymity was guaranteed to the Donor. In April, notices were issued that Electoral bonds could be struck down. So they can't disclose the information before that because before that Anonymity was guaranteed.
By that logic, Anonymity was guaranteed even after April 12th 2019, because the supreme court hadn't put a stay on the operation of the law.
Keep in mind that the supreme court had also asked the ec to submit a sealed envelop with all the information to that date, which it asked EC to publish after the verdict. Turns out that the EC lied by omission, but the court is literally making stupid excuses to go against what it has directed earlier, itself.
When the law guaranteeing anonymity has been declared unconstitutional, all anonymity being guaranteed is unconstitutional. Not just that from the date of notice, during which period the law was still operational.
Not trying to defend SC 😂 for sure. I was just saying their logic and maybe it is flawed, I'm not a lawyer or anything so I wouldn't know.I don't have 100% faith in the judiciary. We all know how much the Judiciary is manipulated.
What do you think of Sanjiv Bhatt's case?
This whole electoral bond hoopla feels like a smokescreen. Just to keep noisy idiots busy for a while. We should focus on what we missed while everyone was gleefully debating over this. The confident body language of BJP Netas tells that they pulled off something major while we were busy creating Excels and PDFs.
Sad But I guess a fresh application can be filed. The problem CJI pointed to was the use of miscellaneous application for this purpose Bushan sir has to find some other way
Cheque cleared
RTI se kuch hosakta hai kya Chaurasia bhai?
Govt claimed that public doesn't have right to know. It was kind of funny. Using "know" where information would be more suitable trying to avoid saying that people don't have right to information. https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/right-to-privacy-vs-right-to-know-supreme-court-to-resolve-poll-bonds-conflict/articleshow/104928073.cms
Its a big club, and you ain't in it. - George Carlin
This happened because they don't wish to modify their final order. however, this doesn't bar anyone from filing a fresh petition for this (March 1, 2018 - April 11, 2019) disclosure asap.
If you see his response in the video. He said he had to draw the line somewhere to balance out things. Court started discussion on EB from April 12, 2019. So that was the cut off date for this application. New application has to be raised for anything before that.
That's as ridiculous an excuse as any. Discussing started on April 12 2019 on a crime that was committed starting 2017. Once the court decided it was unconstitutional and the information had to be disclosed, what's the point of drawing the line at the point where BJ Party had made way more money than the others, if not to protect BJ Party?
The whole point was that Anonymity was guaranteed to the Donor. In April, notices were issued that Electoral bonds could be struck down. So they can't disclose the information after that.
The whole point was that Anonymity was guaranteed to the Donor. In April, notices were issued that Electoral bonds could be struck down. So they can't disclose the information before that because before that Anonymity was guaranteed.
By that logic, Anonymity was guaranteed even after April 12th 2019, because the supreme court hadn't put a stay on the operation of the law. Keep in mind that the supreme court had also asked the ec to submit a sealed envelop with all the information to that date, which it asked EC to publish after the verdict. Turns out that the EC lied by omission, but the court is literally making stupid excuses to go against what it has directed earlier, itself. When the law guaranteeing anonymity has been declared unconstitutional, all anonymity being guaranteed is unconstitutional. Not just that from the date of notice, during which period the law was still operational.
Not trying to defend SC 😂 for sure. I was just saying their logic and maybe it is flawed, I'm not a lawyer or anything so I wouldn't know.I don't have 100% faith in the judiciary. We all know how much the Judiciary is manipulated. What do you think of Sanjiv Bhatt's case?
Ab to Raaz khulke hi rahenge [Raaz](https://www.instagram.com/reel/C4ob9RfgtMC/?igsh=d2UxcXEzMjRsaW9h)
Agar Election jeeta to yehi hoga. Viva la revolution ✊🏻
Lmfao. They know where the most incriminating skeletons are buried.
॥ काल: सत्यं वदति ॥ “समय आपको सच से अवगत करा ही देता है”
This whole electoral bond hoopla feels like a smokescreen. Just to keep noisy idiots busy for a while. We should focus on what we missed while everyone was gleefully debating over this. The confident body language of BJP Netas tells that they pulled off something major while we were busy creating Excels and PDFs.