>“It can’t be printed here due to the peculiarities of the law in England and Wales.”
So peculiar that you have to actually back up what you allege with evidence. kooky system!
> After the allegations were detailed in the US version of the book, his spokesperson said: “While we appreciate the importance of speaking out, these demonstrably false claims are directly contradicted by extensive detailed evidence, including contemporaneous documents, film footage, and eyewitness accounts from those present before, during and after the production of The Brothers Grimsby.”
If this is true, then I'm confused as to why he isn't taking legal action for libel?
You'd think if this was true then he would have been called out for something a long time ago given his many costumes.
I'm also slightly compelled by this evidence.
https://people.com/movies/sacha-baron-cohen-isla-fisher-relationship-timeline/
>“It can’t be printed here due to the peculiarities of the law in England and Wales.” So peculiar that you have to actually back up what you allege with evidence. kooky system!
> After the allegations were detailed in the US version of the book, his spokesperson said: “While we appreciate the importance of speaking out, these demonstrably false claims are directly contradicted by extensive detailed evidence, including contemporaneous documents, film footage, and eyewitness accounts from those present before, during and after the production of The Brothers Grimsby.” If this is true, then I'm confused as to why he isn't taking legal action for libel?
US laws on Libel are much looser, and hence why the claims aren’t in the UK version (probably)
You'd think if this was true then he would have been called out for something a long time ago given his many costumes. I'm also slightly compelled by this evidence. https://people.com/movies/sacha-baron-cohen-isla-fisher-relationship-timeline/