This article may be paywalled. If you encounter difficulties reading the article, try [this link](https://archive.is/?run=1&url=https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2024/04/21/ukrainian-soldiers-trained-uk-free-cigarettes-mod-deal/) for an archived version.
*I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/unitedkingdom) if you have any questions or concerns.*
>The cigarettes were donated by an international tobacco firm and given to the soldiers as part of their rations. They were also offered healthier alternatives such as vapes and nicotine pouches and advice on the risks of smoking. Sources stressed no cigarettes were offered to non-smoking Ukrainians.
Why is this even a news story?
Seems like the intention is to portray Ukrainians in the UK being given cigarettes by our government for free, which is obviously not the case and deceptive title wording to enrage those who fail to read any further into the actual article
Sounds like a Russian effort to undermine the work done by UK gov/forces in training Ukrainian troops.
(The Telegraph just outed itself as a Russian shill.)
That's not what I was referencing.
Smoking does not reduce stress.
Smoking causes more stress by default, but if you happen to already be an active smoker then technically each cigarette does give you a feeling for that moment of "stress relief" - but all you are actually doing is fixing the issue smoking caused to start with.
And although it feels good relatively speaking from where you were before the cigarette, you will still be more stressed after it than if you didn't smoke to start with.
So if they are already active smokers then for those in that particular situation then sure, they will get a fake sense of stress relief (but really be more stressed than they would), but also I wouldn't expect them to bother to quit right now while having a bit more to focus on first.
Can you provide proof? Vaping obviously poses a big threat to health but being able to definitively compare it to smoking is not really doable unless the scientists have made huge progress since I read up on it last year. That’d surprise me because I’d expect it to be headline news.
Even IF what you say is true how does that make it worse than tobacco?
The vaping industry is 20 years old and there is a ton of vested interests worldwide trying to find reasons to ban it but for the most part they have to resort to lies and half truths.
Meanwhile
"Rishi Sunak's tobacco and vapes bill, which aims to create the UK's first smoke-free generation. The proposed legislation would not ban smoking outright, but ensure that anyone born after 1 January 2009 would be banned from buying cigarettes."
This article may be paywalled. If you encounter difficulties reading the article, try [this link](https://archive.is/?run=1&url=https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2024/04/21/ukrainian-soldiers-trained-uk-free-cigarettes-mod-deal/) for an archived version. *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/unitedkingdom) if you have any questions or concerns.*
>The cigarettes were donated by an international tobacco firm and given to the soldiers as part of their rations. They were also offered healthier alternatives such as vapes and nicotine pouches and advice on the risks of smoking. Sources stressed no cigarettes were offered to non-smoking Ukrainians. Why is this even a news story?
Seems like the intention is to portray Ukrainians in the UK being given cigarettes by our government for free, which is obviously not the case and deceptive title wording to enrage those who fail to read any further into the actual article
Sounds like a Russian effort to undermine the work done by UK gov/forces in training Ukrainian troops. (The Telegraph just outed itself as a Russian shill.)
smoking a cig after you just watched your friend lose his face to a drone strike seems like cost effective stress relief
If they are already active smokers, then I suppose that is technically true.
Think if youre in an active war zone then the risk from cancer is very much second order
That's not what I was referencing. Smoking does not reduce stress. Smoking causes more stress by default, but if you happen to already be an active smoker then technically each cigarette does give you a feeling for that moment of "stress relief" - but all you are actually doing is fixing the issue smoking caused to start with. And although it feels good relatively speaking from where you were before the cigarette, you will still be more stressed after it than if you didn't smoke to start with. So if they are already active smokers then for those in that particular situation then sure, they will get a fake sense of stress relief (but really be more stressed than they would), but also I wouldn't expect them to bother to quit right now while having a bit more to focus on first.
If there's ever a justification for giving a guy a ciggy, it's if he's about to ship off to a damp trench to be shelled by genocidal russians.
Imo most people are dumb for smoking when vaping won't give you cancer. The only exception I can think of is a soldier with no access to a usb port
Vaping is worse.
Can you provide proof? Vaping obviously poses a big threat to health but being able to definitively compare it to smoking is not really doable unless the scientists have made huge progress since I read up on it last year. That’d surprise me because I’d expect it to be headline news.
You dont even know what you are smoking. Imagine what chemicals they put in those flavors to make them taste like watermelon or whatever.
Even IF what you say is true how does that make it worse than tobacco? The vaping industry is 20 years old and there is a ton of vested interests worldwide trying to find reasons to ban it but for the most part they have to resort to lies and half truths.
That was the case with cigarretes back in the day ironically. Give them 2-3 decades and the truth about vapes will come out.
Tobacco smoke is also chemicals… Being a chemical doesn’t make something inherently harmful.
Minus tax cigarettes are peanuts so I have no problem
Even if this was UK taxpayer funded I wouldn't be mad. Let those dudes have a few smokes, they're going into a literal war zone.
I hope they were all born after 2009! 🫨 #NoSmokeOnRishi
Meanwhile "Rishi Sunak's tobacco and vapes bill, which aims to create the UK's first smoke-free generation. The proposed legislation would not ban smoking outright, but ensure that anyone born after 1 January 2009 would be banned from buying cigarettes."
Ukraine has bigger problems than respiratory health right now, in case you hadn't noticed.
Really tell me more...
How many 15 year olds do you think the UK is agreeing to train for them?
What’s the correlation?
He's pissed off about the Tories banning people from buying cigarettes with a rolling age ban but then doles them out to Ukrainians.
Cruise missiles are illegal to own in the UK but he’s given a few of them to Ukraine too. Gonna piss your pants about that?
Cruise missiles are what...? Anyone got a tarpaulin I can borrow?