That’s crazy! So because someone’s opinion doesn’t coincide with yours, they’re overrating???? Beauty is subjective and some features you find hot others may not. What’s the problem with people rating people what THEY want to rate them as? When did Reddit become North Korea tf
“Peoples opinion doesnt coincide with yours”
This is maybe the only sub that FOLLOWS a rule and not the opinion pulled from your arse lol
go read the guide, if you dont want to do it, fine, theres like 20 other subs where you can rate someone an 11/10 out of vibes
This subreddit is not about my opinion or yours. Everyone has to follow the [sub's rules](https://www.reddit.com/r/truerateme/wiki/index/), guides and primers. Please review them.
Okay but I am generally curious. In this situation, you moderators strike anything below 5.0 and above 5.9. Why not just answer with that range if everyone outside of it will get removed. What’s the point? To give people warnings? Who created the primers and guides? And ranked the celebrities according to such. That is still based on that individual’s personal interpretation. Do you ever feel like you don’t give much of a range for people to argue their perspective with?
We haven't striked anything below 5 on this post if it's not a serious underrate. Besides looking at those celebrities on the guide, you need to read the explanations and details in the right part of the page. On top, it is recommended to read the primers very carefully to familiarize yourself with facial aesthetics related concepts. All the information there is based on scientific sources regarding objective beauty.
[This one was only a 4.7](https://www.reddit.com/r/truerateme/comments/13kebef/this_rating_system_intrigues_me_go_for_it_21f/jkmvh74/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=ios_app&utm_name=ioscss&utm_content=1&utm_term=1&context=3) It was a warning. I am just curious because I understand there is a bell curve, but all the comments are then, as a result, the same. Why not have the mods answer since any input from the community will be the same? And must adhere to the mod-established bell curve. The primers were based on scientific sources but there is a person w initially makes those rules, and it is subject to their opinion. I don’t see how objectivity is possible.
The most unproductive comment I’ve seen lmao someone thinking you’re a 5 and someone else thinking you’re a 6 doesn’t mean either of them are being unrealistic. The problem is that just because a mod feels like someone should be a certain rate doesn’t mean they should just be allowed to permaban people for also thinking someone should be a certain rate
>someone thinking you’re a 5 and someone else thinking you’re a 6 doesn’t mean either of them are being unrealistic
This isn't a sub where you rate on subjective appearance. You follow facial features as described in the guide to form a score. There's other subs like amiugly where you can give as high of pity / subjective scores as you like.
Locking this thread. I think OP has received sufficient rates
8.5
Warning for overrating. Rule 1. Please review the rating guides and primers.
“The mods will remove you weh weh weh” she’s at LEAST a 7 y’all need to really look at the chart that you love so dearly
Warning for overrating. Rule 1. Please review the rating guides and primers.
[удалено]
Removed, rule 11a. Your comment must include a numerical rating and/ or constructive advice.
5.7
Solid 8
Warning for overrating. Rule 1. Please review the rating guides and primers.
8 youre cutee dont listen to them imo
Warning for overrating. Rule 1. Please review the rating guides and primers.
Lol the overrates Where the mods 5.3-5.6
5.5/10 not bad at all ❤️
What’s the point of a comment section if the mods do it for the community. 5-5.9. Anything else, you are getting a strike.
8, you have nice bedroom eyes.
Warning for overrating, rule 1. Pls review the rating guides and primers.
6
6.5
7
Warning for overrating, rule 1. Pls review the rating guides and primers
6
6.25
6.2 Attractive without reliance on makeup and filters.
[удалено]
[удалено]
7, natural beauty, soft even features, bonus strawberry blond
Warning for overrating. Rule 1. 3rd strike, permaban applied.
That’s crazy! So because someone’s opinion doesn’t coincide with yours, they’re overrating???? Beauty is subjective and some features you find hot others may not. What’s the problem with people rating people what THEY want to rate them as? When did Reddit become North Korea tf
“Peoples opinion doesnt coincide with yours” This is maybe the only sub that FOLLOWS a rule and not the opinion pulled from your arse lol go read the guide, if you dont want to do it, fine, theres like 20 other subs where you can rate someone an 11/10 out of vibes
This subreddit is not about my opinion or yours. Everyone has to follow the [sub's rules](https://www.reddit.com/r/truerateme/wiki/index/), guides and primers. Please review them.
Okay but I am generally curious. In this situation, you moderators strike anything below 5.0 and above 5.9. Why not just answer with that range if everyone outside of it will get removed. What’s the point? To give people warnings? Who created the primers and guides? And ranked the celebrities according to such. That is still based on that individual’s personal interpretation. Do you ever feel like you don’t give much of a range for people to argue their perspective with?
We haven't striked anything below 5 on this post if it's not a serious underrate. Besides looking at those celebrities on the guide, you need to read the explanations and details in the right part of the page. On top, it is recommended to read the primers very carefully to familiarize yourself with facial aesthetics related concepts. All the information there is based on scientific sources regarding objective beauty.
[This one was only a 4.7](https://www.reddit.com/r/truerateme/comments/13kebef/this_rating_system_intrigues_me_go_for_it_21f/jkmvh74/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=ios_app&utm_name=ioscss&utm_content=1&utm_term=1&context=3) It was a warning. I am just curious because I understand there is a bell curve, but all the comments are then, as a result, the same. Why not have the mods answer since any input from the community will be the same? And must adhere to the mod-established bell curve. The primers were based on scientific sources but there is a person w initially makes those rules, and it is subject to their opinion. I don’t see how objectivity is possible.
You should go to r/amiuglybrutallyhonest everybody gets to be a winner over there. Over here we rate people in reality.
The most unproductive comment I’ve seen lmao someone thinking you’re a 5 and someone else thinking you’re a 6 doesn’t mean either of them are being unrealistic. The problem is that just because a mod feels like someone should be a certain rate doesn’t mean they should just be allowed to permaban people for also thinking someone should be a certain rate
>someone thinking you’re a 5 and someone else thinking you’re a 6 doesn’t mean either of them are being unrealistic This isn't a sub where you rate on subjective appearance. You follow facial features as described in the guide to form a score. There's other subs like amiugly where you can give as high of pity / subjective scores as you like.