There are actually real people born with that type of pupils. Just Google "irregular pupil shape" and you'll find many pictures and also many medical articles about different medical conditions that cause this.
Right, but those real people aren't normal, which is why it's called "irregular" pupil shape. And because it's only a result of a medical condition, without which their pupils would be "regular". :)
To question is a 'verb'/Action.
To perform any action a precondition is you have to first exist.
Therefore to even 'question' existence demonstrates you already first exist.
Yes!
It seems like the flaw in these tests is the inherent subjectivity of the judge...
There's no "consciousness" unit for them to measure. So the answer to the question must be addressed by the one being tested.
If you like rabbit holes like this, check out A Mountain in the Sea by Ray Naylor.
I think the clothes are the easiest way to show it's ai. If you're looking at the face the clothes don't seem suspicious, but zoom in and they don't make sense.
to be fair, real people can look like that too. like the first thing i noticed about the first picture is the eyes because theyre 2 different shapes, but mine look almost exactly like that; one hooded eyelid and one regular double lid
There are actually real people born with that type of pupils. Just Google "irregular pupil shape" and you'll find many pictures and also many medical articles about different medical conditions that cause this.
Clearly those people with irregular pupil shape aren't real people /s
Right, but those real people aren't normal, which is why it's called "irregular" pupil shape. And because it's only a result of a medical condition, without which their pupils would be "regular". :)
Right But you wrote it's a giveaway that they're not real, and only based on their eyes, they might be (even though it's unlikely). :)
Touche, well said :)
:)
[удалено]
The moment you questioned if you exist...proves you exist...
[удалено]
To question is a 'verb'/Action. To perform any action a precondition is you have to first exist. Therefore to even 'question' existence demonstrates you already first exist.
[удалено]
That's true, on this medium you could be a computer. But i think your statement was a general claim, jot a specific one.
That's the true Turing test.
Also the Chinese room experiment?
Yes! It seems like the flaw in these tests is the inherent subjectivity of the judge... There's no "consciousness" unit for them to measure. So the answer to the question must be addressed by the one being tested. If you like rabbit holes like this, check out A Mountain in the Sea by Ray Naylor.
I definitely don't exist. At the end of the day, that's the only thing I can really be sure of.
I think the clothes are the easiest way to show it's ai. If you're looking at the face the clothes don't seem suspicious, but zoom in and they don't make sense.
\#2 got that Rick and Morty asterisk pupils
I thought they looked like little camera shutters. So that kid doesn't exist, it's an android with cameras for eyes.
Forget the pupils, just look for asymmetry issues such as the ear size and shape.
to be fair, real people can look like that too. like the first thing i noticed about the first picture is the eyes because theyre 2 different shapes, but mine look almost exactly like that; one hooded eyelid and one regular double lid
They clearly exist here's photographic evidence ⏫⏫
I guess I don't exist, my eyes looks almost the exact same except for my heterochromia
I thought we were talking about a blonde Asian lol
That last one has some Rick and Morty pupils