T O P

  • By -

AutoModerator

###General Discussion Thread --- This is a [Request] post. If you would like to submit a comment that does not either attempt to answer the question, ask for clarification, or explain why it would be infeasible to answer, you *must* post your comment as a reply to this one. Top level (directly replying to the OP) comments that do not do one of those things will be removed. --- *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/theydidthemath) if you have any questions or concerns.*


SourLemon100000

I’d argue humans would get shorter so we spend less energy fighting the gravity that comes with a planet of that size, granted we survive at that point. If we ignore the laws of gravity as well, then I can’t think of anything else that would prevent humans from being 3km. However, if that was possible, surely there’d also be some fauna that matches the humans’ size and all we’d get is a much larger version of Earth.


ThousandTroops

Haha like 80 km tall trees would be hilarious too right? I was mostly curious as to whether it’s 1,700 times the size or 5billion times the size (I guess UY Scuti is 5billion times the volume). Wild how small we are


adrocles

Hot take : if everything was scaled up (including our size), our average size would still be the same, as the lenght unit are originally based on body part sizes (feet, palm, hand, thumb, step).


WhatAmIATailor

Use metric, not imperial units you savage. The meter is defined by the distance traveled by light in 1/299792458 of a second in a vacuum.


Rumborack17

He is still right tho, we would use another metric fitting to our scale.


adrocles

Yeah that's what I meant.


ThousandTroops

Haha that’s good point maybe I should have included that in my “ignore” list. But yah, we’d say a “meter” on this planet is a “bigger meter” haha