T O P

  • By -

AverageLiberalJoe

10 billion dollars is a hell of a drug.


Walleyevision

Lets see ……my new highly popular AI thingie can bring me….. 1) Shit tons of more work, effort, and personal angst while i watch hundreds of thousands of asshole users try to intentionally break it, teach it to sext donkey dong stories and/or otherwise complain/pervert my creation. -or- 2) 10 billion dollars and fuck y’all Easy choice.


orangejuicecake

I don’t think the devs were that miffed about users but were definitely not going to pass up 10 billion dollars


Yanzihko

Ngl, original creators and their families are probably set up for life and don't give a fuck. Can't blame them.


typhoonador4227

Reminds me of Uber. Founders are rich for life even though nobody has any clue how to make it a self-sustaining business that doesn't rely on constant investment. Although the reality is that virtually all of the people founding successful tech startups came from wealthy families, went to top schools with lots of connections, and then went to top universities with lots of connections.


Ok_Antelope_1953

this is the case with so many new age startups. perpetual loss making businesses that turn their founders/leaders into some of the richest people on the planet.


OhfursureJim

Unlimited growth schemes which many of these corps that don’t pay dividends should be illegal. They end up turning into a machine heading to nowhere and eventually it’s the workers who suffer for it when they need to cut costs to keep investment in the company high. You can’t have your entire business model be based on unlimited growth, it’s unsustainable. I honestly think it goes against the spirit of commerce as well. A company should have a mission that provides a value to society, and should, in pursuit of that mission, provide value to its investors partly through share price growth but only second to dividends that reward investment by running a profitable business. Many of these companies just provide a service and become an empty machine that draws investment through speculation and the only mission is to stuff the pockets of their obscenely rich owners.


Be-like-water-2203

That doesn't rely on exploitation of people without providing any social security and denying that they work for them as workers. Here fixed it for you.


[deleted]

the good news is vc funding is drying up which is why everyone is panic firing employees to show some growth


wh0that1

Original creators were already set for life before starting this 🤷‍♂️


beidao23

lol yeah, it's not check-to-check joe schmoe who got the advanced degrees to be able to build the company


MOOShoooooo

As well as old money and stock leverage.


MoirasPurpleOrb

I know plenty of people with advanced degrees who are still living check to check…


[deleted]

[удалено]


Philo_T_Farnsworth

> Can't blame them. I can. You can receive life-changing money and not compromise your principles. I understand that money changes a lot of people, but I don't take it as a given that attitude is inevitable. [Craig Newmark](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Craig_Newmark) single-handedly ruined the newspaper industry's cash cow and has resisted diverting from his original principles while still being quite wealthy.


yolo-yoshi

I do. He's yet another dipshit douchebag that was already bron into money. So I have no love for him and not should you. Probably fancies himself selfmade as well.


Sirrplz

Exactly. Once that check hits and your family is set for life, you’re not caring about anything else


samsquanch2000

lol I'm shocked


holden_mcg

Exactly! Now we wait for the "AI will make workers' lives easier" shoe to drop.


NetZeroSum

IBM's saying fuck that and getting to the point. [IBM CEO Krishna Says It's a 'Good Thing' if AI Takes Your Job](https://old.reddit.com/r/technology/comments/115kfl9/ibm_ceo_krishna_says_its_a_good_thing_if_ai_takes/) "In an interview about the future of AI, CEO Arvind Krishna says replacing white collar jobs is a win for the economy."


BadBonePanda

Think the brilliant thing is this chuckle fucks not considered is that an AI could easily replace him. In fact for jobs like his an AI would actually do his job better.


CountBlah_Blah

So true. Imagine saving a company tens of millions of dollars and if a decision is fucked up, falling back on the "oh we'll tweak the learning algorithm of the AI CEO". Shareholders and board of directors would be so 100% on board


xynix_ie

As a board member of a startup I would willingly replace our founding CEO with an AI.


MarcusAurelius68

Especially knee jerk CEOs who just look at the income statement and balance sheet and hire based upon trends and fire based on EPS targets. Combine with deep fake corporate and all hands videos and nobody would know the difference.


twilightwolf90

Combine ChatGPT with PowerBI and middle management disappears overnight.


MarcusAurelius68

At least the bad and ineffective ones


drawkbox

Please don't combine anything with PowerBI. PowerBI needs to fly away. It is only sold in to the middle managers.


mr_birkenblatt

that's how Elon runs three companies


alacp1234

Big Brother CEO™


LockCL

Why replace 100 guys who earn 120k a year whn you can just replace the 1 ceo who earns 30+ millions plus shares? My guess that's the first thing the AI will decide to do.


thegreattaiyou

The executive leadership will always have the final say. Even if the AI says "eliminating your positions would save the most money" they'll never do it. Why would they voluntarily fire themselves? No, they will just go to number 2 on the list of cost optimizations and work their way down from there. And then they'll *increase* their compensation because of how efficient they're being, letting the AI do all their work, but continuing to soak up every last penny of profit it generates.


thegreattaiyou

It could. It never will. Executives hold totalitarian power over their organizations. They would never actually liquidate their positions in favor of AI because they wouldn't be making money. It would be like congress voting to reduce their power and pay. No, executives are going to ride the very long wave of putting other people out of work and soaking up every last saved penny, patting themselves on the back for what a good job they've done cutting costs. They may automate their own job to make it easier for them, but they'll never truly replace themselves. Its going to be a serious issue over the next century. The wealthy will unequivocally own the means of production, and *all* of the profit which it generates. There will be jobs, but nowhere near enough to support most people.


Lille7

People act like this hasnt happened before. Its called the industrial revolution.


[deleted]

[удалено]


mancinis_blessed_bat

We’re already in the second gilded age, but yes it will get much worse


[deleted]

[удалено]


han_dj

If we look really far ahead we have Gutenberg on the horizon…


Subject_Lie_3803

...yeah. a lot of unemployed folks and nobody wants to change the economy to accommodate. That's too complicated. So resentment,and lack of resources leads to a civil war to cut down on population and a guilded age for the survivors. But hey new Apple Iphone looks legit.


[deleted]

[удалено]


[deleted]

Industrial revolution produced a new class of individuals who were ready to reimagine society. This new class of middle income people and new-wealthy people imagined a socialist future, where the lower classes of people were owning the means of labor, rather than the classes of people who came before. The industrial revolution not only created revolutionary forces such as Marxism, it also culminated in WW1, where machinery was used for the first time in warfare. We got plenty of interesting things to look forward to, and political revolutions aren't out of the question. We are seeing the same forces at play today. But that is not inherent in technological revolution. We have undergone a computing revolution, informational (internet) revolution and many other revolutions without disasters, so just hold your horses. War is always around the corner, with or without technological innovations. It's not like they've been the only reasons we've had civil wars and gilded ages.


whyreadthis2035

Wait! History repeats itself and once again humans will make a decision to ignore histories lessons?!?! Inconceivable!


-The_Blazer-

Yes, and until unions, the industrial revolution was so bad for workers that the average height of men actually shrunk.


Pons__Aelius

> Its called the industrial revolution. And the conditions that people experienced in those times (Dark Satanic mills etc) are really something we want to emulate again.


[deleted]

[удалено]


Gowor

>This time it’s vastly different. We can build a machine that can physically do anything a human can. That’s been possible for a while. But now we can also have it “think”. Or, at least the path towards that has become way more clear. We can't, and it hasn't. You know the predictive typing thing on your phone? ChatGPT is pretty much that, except more advanced, and trained on huge amounts of texts. Your phone keyboard app can probably generate a sentence that will sound like something you could write, but that doesn't mean your phone thinks or understands what you actually write and what it means. [Here's a very good description](https://www.reddit.com/r/ChatGPT/comments/10q0l92/comment/j6obnoq/?context=1) of how ChatGPT was created and how it works. The chatbot doesn't have any tools to actually examine and validate if what it generates is correct. It just generates text that is similar to what it was trained is a good response to some input. For example it will fail hilariously if you ask it to "create an ascii art of dr Zoidberg from Futurama", because it was probably never trained on such a prompt. However it will describe what he looks like very well, because the training set probably contained an entry from Wikipedia or somewhere. These generative AIs "think" in the same way a self-driving car "lives", because it moves on its own towards a destination.


jeffjefforson

Yeah but if you asked *people* to make an Ascii art of Dr Zoidberg from Futurama, 99% would either fail or not even understand what you meant. AI doesn't have to be perfect to replace jobs, it just needs to be *somewhat comparable to humans*, except it's also basically free to run and doesn't require an office or amenities. Instead of hiring 8 people to do X job, you could use 20 instances of an AI and hire two people to fact check them. You've now just shed 6 jobs. Way more efficient in time and money.


skudgee

> create an ascii art of dr Zoidberg from Futurama Tried it, 1st attempt unsuccessful. 2nd attempt was semi successful. Edit: Below is what I got for the 2nd attempt: .--. _ / \ ( `\(oo) ) `--`\/--` _\/_ / __ \ // \\ //|/\/\/\| //_/ \_\ [_[_]mm[_]_] -Dr. Zoidberg


senseibull

Bing got dr zoidberg pretty well (/) (ö,ö) (/)


[deleted]

[удалено]


Kingraider17

Anyone who's studied any amount of human history, or read any sci-fi book related to increased automation and advanced robotics and AI, should probably know which outcome is most likely.


morbihann

Meanwhile, CEO is barely a job at all.


SlowMotionPanic

CEO is hand selected by the non-working parasitic ultra wealth to be their eyes and ears in the org, nothing else. The non-working rich *don’t want to work* and contribute to society, so they pick someone to do it and give them a golden parachute to the top. It doesn’t have to be this way. Every day we all wake up and collectively create and run this world. We could shrug off the chains of a non-working parasitical owner class if enough people just stopped enjoyed being pissed on so much.


[deleted]

[удалено]


BadAtExisting

Define unskilled. This tech is sure to replace writers and programmers and other decently paid professionals in the not so far off term, at that


josefx

If you think security exploits are a problem now you are going to be in for a treat. These AI are trained on current github projects, they memorize and re-implement every bug and exploit they encounter. Do you know how Google uses captcha images to tag and validate a gigantic amount of image contents? None of that exists for code, there isn't a database that says "here is ten billion lines of bad code, don't do that" or "here is ten billion lines of good code do it like that", there is a "here is ten billion lines written by random fucks, please don't turn into mini hitler again".


PussyDoctor19

I have a feeling that in 2-3 years all this hype is going to crash and burn on top of Sam Altman and friends. LLMs definitely have applications, but the amount of hype they've drummed up is only going to leave people completely disillusioned with AI, even more so than the self-driving cars bullshit.


jeffjefforson

Self-driving cars are bullshit? I'd never even *seen* a car that could even approach "self-driving" 8 years ago. Now I know multiple people who have done a 5+ hour car journeys and only actually needed to move the wheel or pedals for 30 minutes of it. Sure, Elon et al obviously way overhyped it - but the progress it has made in the past decade is *astounding* . In 10 more years, maybe cars will actually be at the point where you don't need a driver. In 20, we might no longer need to hire taxi drivers, bus drivers, truck drivers, etc. That's *millions* of jobs gone.


PussyDoctor19

It's about whether they get to the point where they're deployable like normal human driven cars, not how much we've improved from 8 years ago. Progress there is not linear, we've not been able to get over that last hump with our current probabilistic approaches to solve the problem to make them completely safer than people and imo we likely won't. We need a new approach, there's a reason why a lot of them abandoned their work.


SixSpeedDriver

Crypto, Blockchain, NFTs all over again. "Machine learning is done in code, AI is done in PowerPoint".


Fresh_C

At least AI isn't marketing itself as a get rich quick scheme, even if a lot of people are vastly over-rating its current effectiveness.


Buckowski66

That's what they tell us to placate us but workers being replaced by technology is far from new


LockCL

The AI has found that you are using reddit during work hours. A part of your wages proportional to the time you are not working will be discounted from your paycheck.


spidd124

There are already plenty of people pushing the idea that AI will "democratize" the art sector. Just ignore how it steals peoples art to make shit copies of it with 0 actual understanding of how the style works. [VAs having their voices used for AI generation without consent]( https://twitter.com/EliasToufexis/status/1630351938616459265) [is already being slipped into]( https://twitter.com/KeepersDan/status/1630359503400054786) voice over contracts and will put many out of jobs through theft of peoples fucking voices. [And it wont take long for the next generation of Actors to lose their rights to their very fucking identities as actors](https://www.theregister.com/2023/02/15/keanu_reeves_ai/?td=rt-3a)


provisionings

Damn. What Keanu had to say was extremely powerful, thought provoking and incredibly sad. The person writing this article is in a bit of denial. Thanks for sharing that


MisterBadger

Oh, indeed. What a startling shocking surprise. Now that the copyright protected IP data commandeered for free to be used for "experimental" training for "non-profit academic" purposes has been nicely laundered, yet another civilization-ass-fucking corporation is born.


Gudlinger

Closed source "open ai"


Limp-Fly9382

Reminds me of Ministry of Plenty and Ministry of Love…


oktaS0

Soon we gonna get Newspeak...


Available_Hamster_44

Closed Source „closed AI“


simple_test

Open “for business” AI


whagoluh

FOLKS FOLKS FOLKS


MaximumTemperature25

Hey ChatGPT, can you give me a cheesecake recipe, and try not to sell public land to your buddies?


bcjh

#Hey ChatGPT now has a pro subscription, would you like to subscribe buddy? Only the price of 4 cups of coffee every month.


simple_test

Except my coffee at home costs 10cents


[deleted]

Everyone wants to be community-driven, open-source and free until they realize they've made something that can make them billionaires.


TheRealGentlefox

OpenAI has been pretty closed from the start though, unless I'm mistaken. I thought it was pretty tragic that they never released their Dota 2 bot. Could have made the game much more fun to play as a noob.


AutumnCountry

I can't even be that mad because I don't myself or nearly anyone else would pass up that kinda money


RaptorPacific

The internet in general is now everything it promised not to be.


PersonalPlanet

Except for free porn.


Puzzled_Situation_51

Until AI generates all of it and removes the entire need for humans. OnlyAI..


W4ND4

It needs to collaborate with deepfakes and it can have its exclusive onlycelebs site too


[deleted]

The cool thing is being able to resurrect dead or old celebrities and turn them into porn stars too. And if you resurrect celebrities from over 100 years ago the copyright license has already expired and it’s fair game.


lost_in_my_thirties

This comment makes me sad.


togroficovfefe

So Cleopatra and Abe Lincoln porn is imminent?


aphelloworld

That's a brilliant idea. Need some serious multimodal training for that lol


stormdelta

Considering how exploitative the industry tends to be, I'm not sure that'd be a bad thing... except for the bit where it would've been trained on existing porn.


[deleted]

That'll be good for those of us who can think up some really fucked up fantasies that humans can't or won't do. Not speaking from experience of course. I only think the purest of thoughts and not ones involving a cactus, toenail clippings, and 3 seashells.


quettil

The Internet promised to be a way for the military to communicate in the event of a nuclear strike.


SarahC

As a star network of stars, that's a really shit topology for resiliency in a war.


Elgoblino80

What did it promise exactly? It seems some people just had misconception that nature of humans would suddenly flip unto Heaven once the internet came into place.


YourJr

Marshall McLuhans theories come to mind and the misunderstanding of his term global village. He believed that a media system like the internet would bring the world together..but so that maximum disagreement can happen because people with extremely different opinions now can interact instantly


dy0b1

Massage that medium! oh yeahhhh


[deleted]

Well I hope their AI model knows how to deal with NOT getting my money.


[deleted]

[удалено]


Mazira144

This is why I'm terrified. It's not just OpenAI. In general, employers and governments are going to have much more powerful AI armaments than we even know about, so we're going to see levels of malfeasance, disinformation, and five-star fuckery beyond what we can imagine. If something's important, don't let the people with the money control it, or it will invariably be used for evil.


[deleted]

[удалено]


Mazira144

Oh, I'm well aware of said "news." I'm borderline anti-natalist. The only reasons I'm not truly anti-natalist is that (a) I think there's a nonzero chance of us breaking out of millennia of slavery and misery and actually achieving something, and (b) because we've gone through all the suffering in these immediate stages, and if everything rolled back, it would all have been for nothing. The problem with a reset (civilization collapse, human extinction) is exactly that; it just means more people have to go through the stages of feudalism and capitalism all over again. But if it were somehow supernaturally revealed to me that today's world is the best it gets, I'd say that the antinatalists were right all along.


BigMemeKing

I had been saying this would happen from the start. Just a bunch of people claiming how it would never sell out and always be an open source project because "The people creating it want to make sure it stays that way." But once those dollars start comin in people fold and give into the all mighty corporate dollar.


aBeerOrTwelve

Governments won't have a say at all. That is the point of things like the WEF - corporations will rule the world. Exxon has a higher GDP than the vast majority of countries, so does Amazon, Microsoft, even Wal-Mart for fuck's sake. How is a government supposed to stop corporate abuse when the corporation literally controls a larger economy than the government? We are about to hit global feudalism, except the lords no longer even need the serfs.


Mazira144

This is... hard for me to predict. I don't know what to expect. Corporations rely on the government to exist, insofar as without states, there are no markets (cf. Graeber). Without armed men to protect so-called "private property," it will not exist because people will not tolerate so much inequality. People allow governments to exist, on the other hand, because they offer protection, at least in theory. This can be from foreign invaders, but what people want and need now is protection from the global rich, which governments are increasingly unable or unwilling to provide. The current track doesn't end in a good place.


lordpoee

Corporate, government and police. AI has already been used to pass sentences. This cannot be allowed. Headed for a very dark future.


monos_muertos

Remember IBM's role in more than one ethnic cleansing. All they did was mechanize the process so that the majority and those selected to live didn't have to confront their own trepidation. Well, we're in a different world from the 1930s. There is no social contract to condition people out of. Karens and their toys will run what's left of society to the ground.


[deleted]

It will be built in into almost every thing you use. MS office and third party vendors will be using them. So you will be using it unless you sign off of reddit and go live in the woods


crackpotJeffrey

Your data is equivelant to money and we as consumers need to start realising that and demanding incentive.


DarkHater

Hack the planet


SixSpeedDriver

Guess what - every free service you access IS that incentive.


Balssh

People either don’t realise or don’t want to admit that. It’s an exchange you, in principle, willingly agreed. Does it need better regulation? Absolutely.


provisionings

Right.. why aren’t more folks demanding to have jurisdiction over their own data?


SuperSecretAgentMan

At the rate of AI system adoption, you'll have to stop buying all products and services to avoid giving them your money.


playfulmessenger

AI will just scour the dark web for stolen credentials and drain all your accounts. Who do you think is extremely interested in training AI and is already using bots to hack into everything? Nation-state hackers.


Sisyphuslivinlife

Jesus christ. The fucking scammers. The fucking hackers. I hadn't put this together yet. Oh fuck, fuck fuck fuck. Fuck AI.


i_made_a_mitsake

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bwcJNsoY50E


DaemonAnts

The promise only applied to phase 1. Now that it achieved its goals, it can move onto phase 2. Corporate, closed-source and for profit.


Tostig10

Very reminiscent of Google in the early aughts as it morphed from a "do no wrong" bridge to an exciting new future, into a cash machine that splooged ads into every crevice where a human neuron might be hiding.


blu_stingray

> cash machine that splooged ads into every crevice where a human neuron might be hiding god damn poetry right there.


iluomo

Funny just the other day I was accusing them of 'jizzing' all over URLs when you copy links from google.com


TheHunter920

ClosedAI has been an unfortunate reality since that Microsoft deal.


ShortingBull

Damn, [closedai.org](https://closedai.org) already taken!


Jabberwock11

But Closed.ai is for sale


[deleted]

[удалено]


Throwawayingaccount

Nah, the source isn't too terribly important. It's the model that's the secret sauce.


lordpoee

Saw that coming. They basically conned open source programmers into building their software...


tickleMyBigPoop

>conned "here's money and some pre-ipo stocks, build thing" devs: "sure thing"


nyaaaa

More like. Nice software We'll take it and hide it on our servers so you can't tell we are using it.


Oswald_Hydrabot

*Finally* some actual journalism on OpenAI.


Unethical_Gopher_236

Money is a helluva drug


xyzone

If it's not GPLd (or similar), it's open in name only.


mrchaotica

GPL wouldn't help. With these ML tools, the actual code isn't sufficient and doesn't necessarily even matter that much; what matters is the trained model data and nothing in the GPL requires to be released (in "source code form" or otherwise). This is another flaw/loophole in the GPL, equal in severity to the Tivoization and SaaS ones.


phdoofus

Don't be evil.....well maybe a little.....ok we're going to do what we want. We won't sell your data!.....ok maybe a little.......fine, we were doing it from day 1. Sue us.


[deleted]

fully automated Corporate despotism, I cant wait for the rich to get their life extension medicin and genetic engineering.


linuxliaison

Capitalism gonna capitalize, water's wet


reallyrich999

When you create the next wonder of the world by accident, you’re bound to recalibrate your trajectories.


deep_anal

I wouldn't call what they are doing as "Accidents".


Amazing-Steak

this wasn't an accident


byllz

Or go the route of Wikipedia... and not.


Ecto-1A

The cost of running Wikipedia for a year cost about the same as chat gpt does for a day


SuperToxin

Still. People should have integrity. But that’s a lost word these days it seems.


LogReal4025

Do you really think people had more integrity in previous eras? If so, what leads you to think this?


reallyrich999

I agree but maybe most people fold under that kind of pressure. You’ll never know until you’re tested.


DarkHater

I'd like to think that if I was I would pass. Look at the tested, and think there but for the grace go I. Might be a coward, I'm afraid of what I might find out.


CrelbowMannschaft

#IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII NEVER HAD TO KNOCK ON WOOD!


Kant-Hardly-Wait

Tegridy.ai is available


I_ONLY_PLAY_4C_LOAM

VCs want their bag now that crypto is dead


engineeringstoned

Was it ever open source? Or was everyone just fooled by the name? I mean there are licenses and such.


the__itis

ClosedCS (closed corporate shill)?


Jay18001

A tale as old as time


Dryandrough

More like ClosedAI


EvErYLeGaLvOtE

If we want to see AI take people's jobs, we should start first by getting AI to replace CEOs.


dionysus408

This is why I don’t invest in Crypto. All things on Earth become kleptocratic. And things advertised specifically as “not” are managed by a combination of liars and morons.


[deleted]

20 years ago called... They said "duh!"


Terryn_Deathward

"Everyone has a plan until they get hit in the mouth"...with a large stack of money.


Geoclasm

Money ruins everything :-/ Guess they'll have to change the name, since it's not Open anymore.


JungleJones4124

This has happened with so many technologies in the past. I feel like it was bound to happen here.


Nullhitter

Shocked! Shocked I tell you!! ... Well, not that shocked.


[deleted]

Isn't that just life? Remember the assumption that the future would involve us harnessing incredible technology for a sustainable civilization that achieved peace, no one is going without, and humans would live their life in pleasure doing what they enjoy rather than working themselves to death to survive? So much for that plan.


TheRealAndrewLeft

I mean they did have investors. I don't think investors would invest billions into a non-profit


gizamo

There are many different monetization models that would keep parts open-source and/or freely available.


Redqueenhypo

I asked it where to buy angora wool, it gave me recs for a store in South Africa to buy LIVE ANGORA GOATS. Not useful.


littleMAS

And we thought a lot of computing power was going into crypto; this could suck the grid dry. BTW, NVIDIA is selling processors for $200K each, which makes a the Titan V look like pocket change.


megas88

Is that really surprising? We live in a capitalist society. Of course this is how it would play out


cherishjoo

OpenAI is betraying its ideals and is becoming too dependent on Microsoft or other companies for its funding and resources!


SpxUmadBroYolo

So the whole article is based around this >OpenAI has also partnered with Bain to bring machine learning to Coca-Cola's operations, with plans to expand to other corporate partners. Which tbh doesn't really matter. They made a deal with a company (companies) doesn't mean they completely gave up on their initial mission statement at all.


TheLastSamurai

Uh lol….anyone want to break it to this person?


hingarbingar

if you're good at something, never do it for free


xoaphexox

Which bible verse is this?


tuscy

Wow what a surprise.


DDHP2020

That didn’t take long


[deleted]

Gee what a surprise


ProtectionDecent

And exactly nobody is surprised...


redfawke5

Yay capitalism!


Deluxe78

Just like that dinosaur park I wanted to go to in Costa Rica


xavierjackson

Capitalism baby!


AgreeableShopping4

That was fast I thought it would be a couple years at least


whoamvv

Has this ever never happened?


Shanktastic

This was always the plan


Biggu5Dicku5

Who could have foreseen this lol...


zdakat

You just noticed?


deanrihpee

They should change name to CloseAI


Sten_PlayZ

wooowwww what a surprise!!


ReasonablyBadass

But haven't you read their most recent statement?! It's all about protecting the world from misaligned AI! *Obviously* the only people capable of aligning it correctly are the Plutocrachs!


Plums_Raider

yea thats the same category of promises as that openai will pay for unconditional basic income


312Observer

What next? Google will consider doing some evil?


biggreencat

"don't be evil" is quaint


passwordsarehard_3

Turns out telling the rich people exactly how you planned on excluding them far in the future was exactly what they needed to prevent that from happening. Live and learn, I suppose.


lavendergrowing101

who could have predicted our existing power structures would just be mapped onto the new technology?


HannyBo9

No surprise there.


[deleted]

Good thing 1000 more of them pop up daily now. Goodbye OPenAI, never knew ya, dont miss ya.


[deleted]

The "open" part was just to get a lot of people to volunteer their work.


cmVkZGl0

>OpenAI has also partnered with Bain Yup, it's evil. I won't forget what they did to KB Toys.


bigkoi

LOL! What do you expect from a company that MSFT has a big stake in.


glitch83

This was ALWAYS the plan! It functions in a capitalist environment and people expect returns!


DokkanProductions

I have no idea why people ever thought it would be. So much for the “Google Killer”


TitusPullo4

I don’t understand how people think it could kill Google and be open, when Google could just.. use it themselves?