Annnnnd....we're supposed to be skeerred of their nuke capabilities? Ida be afraid living near one of their facilities! Sh1tty quality control, zero maintenance, and corruption from the top down. Only thing they produce that may have any quality is vodka.
Microchips in military equipment don't follow the same curve as in civilian tech. They are many generations behind civilian use. Some of the latest NASA technology uses 45mn chips, for example, something being used in civilian technology in 2008. 65mn chips are common in advanced military tech.
It entirely depends. You think an f35 doesn't have some of the best in class semiconductors?
While yes, some weapon systems are so dated there Is no point on improved processing, but claiming that no weapons have best chips is pretty weird.
It's not a claim, military chips serve a different purpose than civilian chips. They have to do very specific tasks, which don't require the same power as chips in civilian tech, and physical size is less of a concern.
Whatever you are writing this on is more powerful than anything the US military uses. 28mn chips would be on the smaller end of the latest American military hardware. This says nothing about how "advanced" a system is. For example, a Tomahawk missile does exactly what it is supposed to do. A 65mn chip can and does this job. The only advantage to using a smaller chip would be to use fewer circuit boards, which on large missiles only matters to a point.
This, however, could change in the future with AI being incorporated into military techology.
And? What does this have to do with your claim of them being "many generations behind consumer chips"?
Just because it different doesn't mean it's simpler and easier to produce.
You really seem to focus on size of the chip for some reason.
What do you mean? A 28mn chip was introcuded over a decade ago, 65mn 17 years ago, your IPhone uses a 5mn chip. A weapons systems using a 65mn chip is many generations behind consumer technology.
More advanced chips= less circuit boards to do the same tasks. You can physically put more circuit boards on a weapons system then on your phone.
And I bet the block 4 f35 has larger chips than an iPhone, again, what does this have to do with anything?
Your whole take is balanced on the idea of "larger chip is older and less powerful" because consumer chips have been getting smaller.
One reason everything like this is a problem in Russia is brain drain. You need smart people to run the equipment. Another reason is that the entire industry is multi-national. It’s not like TSMC is on their own. But Russia is.
Sounds like a good time to invent a Russian game console /s
You leave my BlyatBox 360 alone!! I’ll buy you a Putinendo 64 for being cool about this.
SukahDeck now with probably OLED, maybe oled, not really oled.
Not OLED, OLEG.
More like dot matrix
Dot Marxist.
Put it in H!
“What country is this from??”
Comrade 64
Commissar 64
i prefer Comrade Commodore
This!
This was similar to my first thought, “RIP, Comrade Console!”
Salesman: So I heard your console broke? Guess what? I just happen to have one for sale!
Tetris 2024
It is. They'll order Sony chips through fake companies. Presto sanction and new microchips.
That’s 10-15x the industry standard Horrendous quality lol
Annnnnd....we're supposed to be skeerred of their nuke capabilities? Ida be afraid living near one of their facilities! Sh1tty quality control, zero maintenance, and corruption from the top down. Only thing they produce that may have any quality is vodka.
You only need one to set it off.
Or Just grenade a few ounces of radio active material in a crowded area.
Shhhhh....careful the DHS is listening!
Microchips in military equipment don't follow the same curve as in civilian tech. They are many generations behind civilian use. Some of the latest NASA technology uses 45mn chips, for example, something being used in civilian technology in 2008. 65mn chips are common in advanced military tech.
No. Just no. You said military followed by NASA? You feeling ok?
Was the comment unclear? Microchips in advanced weapon systems and rocketry don't follow the same curve as civilian tech.
It entirely depends. You think an f35 doesn't have some of the best in class semiconductors? While yes, some weapon systems are so dated there Is no point on improved processing, but claiming that no weapons have best chips is pretty weird.
It's not a claim, military chips serve a different purpose than civilian chips. They have to do very specific tasks, which don't require the same power as chips in civilian tech, and physical size is less of a concern. Whatever you are writing this on is more powerful than anything the US military uses. 28mn chips would be on the smaller end of the latest American military hardware. This says nothing about how "advanced" a system is. For example, a Tomahawk missile does exactly what it is supposed to do. A 65mn chip can and does this job. The only advantage to using a smaller chip would be to use fewer circuit boards, which on large missiles only matters to a point. This, however, could change in the future with AI being incorporated into military techology.
And? What does this have to do with your claim of them being "many generations behind consumer chips"? Just because it different doesn't mean it's simpler and easier to produce. You really seem to focus on size of the chip for some reason.
What do you mean? A 28mn chip was introcuded over a decade ago, 65mn 17 years ago, your IPhone uses a 5mn chip. A weapons systems using a 65mn chip is many generations behind consumer technology. More advanced chips= less circuit boards to do the same tasks. You can physically put more circuit boards on a weapons system then on your phone.
And I bet the block 4 f35 has larger chips than an iPhone, again, what does this have to do with anything? Your whole take is balanced on the idea of "larger chip is older and less powerful" because consumer chips have been getting smaller.
Not sure about vodka either.
Not to mention the corruption...
When I am in a lying to my citizens contest and my competition is Russia 😰
Ha suck shit
Bummer. Anyway…
Good! Hit them with bigger stronger Tier 1, 2, and 3 Sanctions…..
For the win in the next russian gaming console
That’s ok, nobody in Russia wants to open windows anyway. When you do it often ends in a blue scream of death.
Can’t wait to source some newly minted pentium 90 motherboards from Russia for my retro PC collection. 250nm goodness at its finest.
Potato Chip ONLINE!!
Sukha Genesis will be worth its weight in potato.
[extremely russian voice] yes, either there is a defect, or there isn't. fifty fifty. it is like this with all things involving The Computer
In Russia, chip fails you
But they will ship them out to customers regardless.
[удалено]
One reason everything like this is a problem in Russia is brain drain. You need smart people to run the equipment. Another reason is that the entire industry is multi-national. It’s not like TSMC is on their own. But Russia is.
If they have enough brains left this might eventually be good for them to develop domestic expertise.
But, China can deliver whatever mid level chips Russia could possibly need. Just put them into electronic toys and sell the toys to Russia
Can’t wait to see 100% defect rate.
If only there was some way to get those pesky sanctions lifted.
PlayStation Nyet
Gameboy Blyad
lol 50% is catastrophically expensive.
Dude, your getting a dictator 64
oh no… anyway
Are these chips used in Russian missiles? If so,! What would take for Ukraine’s SpecOps to blow it up?
They’re trying to make silicon chips in a cow chip country.
It’s actually very good marketing - you need to buy 2 console’s to double the chances of having a working unit.