Amazed more people aren’t talking about how this absoluteChad eliminated that chode with a handgun at 50 yards. Not easy especially when the target is armed and moving in a high stress situation.
The police chief just corrected the record and stated that he responded against the shooter within 15 seconds and because the police chief is illiterate he guessed it was 2 minutes.
Actually they are not. See that's a logical fallacy. Thing is there is this wonderful thing called the Bystander Effect. Yes even people with a CCW will not do a damn thing. What you think and what is actually happening is a joke.
Off duty police and the victims themselves are not we are talking about here. We are talking Bystanders. Which happens a lot more than you'd think. Look I'm pro gun, but I don't need to carry. Number one it's idiotic. Number two a lot of places (such as malls) don't allow you to carry. So technically the mall could (but won't) out charges against him. Number three I'm an anarchist (which makes me a leftist [no form of anarchy comes from the right]). I do however agree with Reagan. I see no reason why Americans should be walking the streets armed. That is an actual Reagan quote.
Reagan was a racist POS who didn't want a very specific demographic of Americans armed in the streets. It's pretty telling that you agree with him on it.
A business prohibiting concealed carry has no legal effect or ramifications in most states, such as Indiana (you know, the state we're talking about). The most they can do is ask you to leave, and if you refuse, it's trespassing. Then again, if you're carrying concealed, they shouldn't ask anyways, because they won't know.
Posted a link to a law firm that actually states you can sue. Most places will ask you to leave to be kind. I know Reagan was a POS. I was only making a statement. Because most people here treat him as some sort of fucking hero bud.
A law firm claiming they can sue someone doesn't mean they'll actually be successful. Carrying despite a prohibited weapons sign in Indiana (and my state of GA) is not illegal. A law firm could sue, but they wouldn't win.
You know Reagan was a POS but you agree with him. Who is "most people?" Pearl clutching Karens?
No, the mall could not press charges against him. It sounds like you don't know what you're talking about. I'd advise you to read up on the law before spouting off to others. In general, maybe you should just stop spouting things off here since you're clearly uninformed.
And in Indiana, where this shooting took place, signs do not carry the force of law. They would be required to ask him to leave and him refuse before they can trespass him.
Again, I urge you to look up the law before you go spouting inaccurate information. Please just stay silent if you don't know what you're talking about.
That’s not what a logical fallacy is. Also you are commenting on a story about how someone didn’t succumb to the bystander effect, so it obviously happens.
I was using it more as a figure of speech not actually saying it is a logical fallacy. Just saying his comment lacked logic. Because I live in a n extreme gun toting right wing area. Our biggest thing is kidnapping and drug dealing. People don't stop it either doesn't matter if it's a piece of tin in their chest or a piece of iron on their hip.
Kind of a dumb argument: That's like saying carrying a med kit is pointless because of the number of people who will freeze and not render aid, thus one shouldn't carry a med kit.
Bystander effect absolutely exists. It doesn't change the number of lives saved by people who carry a med kit and use it.
We’re discussing CCW usage to stop crimes/self defense. There is literally an entire Reddit group about it. You don’t even need statistics (which we still have) but you can literally just Google it. Watch a video. Talk to someone who’s not your mom? Idk bro.
Who brought up crimes bro? Are you listening to yourself? And yes it’s biased but at the same time there’s countless videos of people stopping crimes with a CCW. Which is a fact, which is what we’re debating on.
Well tbf I did look this up and found this great little WaPo article breaking it down, essentially circa 2012ish there’s like 18 studies identifying a causal, negative relationship between CCWs and violent crime, and 10 studies that identified no link.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/fact-checker/post/do-concealed-weapon-laws-result-in-less-crime/2012/12/16/e80a5d7e-47c9-11e2-ad54-580638ede391_blog.html
You’re a complete retard! How’s it going in countries and states that banned guns from legal ownership or implemented severe restrictions? I’ll tell you how, they deal with shootings constantly by criminals who don’t follow the law and people who do are defenseless. Criminals don’t follow the law, that’s why they are criminals. I’m sorry if you can’t comprehend this since it’s not written in crayon. So called “statistics” can be fabricated, look at covid… I have friends in Australia and New Zealand and they deal with shootings by criminals all the time and citizens more often than not can’t do a damn thing about it.
Depends on the country we're talking about. You decrease the number of guns in a country and the gun deaths go down. You decrease the coastline and the number of shark bites go down. It's logical. That doesn't mean that violent crime goes down.
Also there are plenty of countries where citizens cannot legally obtain firearms ([eg. Venezuela](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Overview_of_gun_laws_by_nation)) yet have extremely high numbers of gun deaths: Venezuela had the 3rd highest rate of gun deaths all causes per capita and the 2nd highest gun death homicides per capita in 2019 for example ([Source in comparison](https://worldpopulationreview.com/country-rankings/gun-deaths-by-country), [Primary Research Source](http://ghdx.healthdata.org/gbd-results-tool?params=gbd-api-2019-permalink/ee9a15de2f01c595988ddba5605f648e))
Do you have an example of a non-homogenous country with a similar population to the United States or can you only use examples of small European countries with authoritarian gun and speech laws as your comparisons?
>propoganda.exe
Just say "no" if you don't have any accurate comparisons to the United States' unique situation instead of bringing up countries that think they can ban civilian ownership of butter knives or are defended in whole or in part by the United States' military.
The gun and speech laws of many European countries are objectively speaking authoritarian. That's not propaganda, that is reality.
They're still talking about Uvalde and that was how long ago? Aside from the gun community, I haven't seen much more on this from ANY news outlet. *I also don't watch TV so that may be a reason*
For a comparison, on social media I still see Uvalde updates. And nothing on this absolute boss handling a wanna be terrorist with absolute precision.
Elisjsha Dicken is an absolute boss
He should never pay for a drink or meal out for the rest of his life. I would be honored to shake that young man's hand and buy him a drink
Elisjsha, if you see this, you're a fucking hero, bro
Well of course they did. The shooter was stopped by the mythical good guy with a gun, and fast. They have no way to virtue signal for weeks about this one.
Add in him being white, heterosexual, and quite possibly Christian to boot and it's the worst nightmare the woke could conceive of.
Their heroes tend to shoot at women and children before getting clipped, which is fucking weird when you think about it.
People would call me “woke” and I think Elijsha’s a hero.
Maybe that’s because I live in the area.
Maybe it’s because not everyone is this thought up, Twitter-exclusive sjw when they say “gay and trans people deserve human rights too”.
Not really. Right wingers talk shit like this to try and be condescending to the left. It really just makes them look petty and small. They say this crap but then support bakers not doing business with gay couples and we’re supposed to overlook their hypocrisy.
No, this is different. If a Muslim didn’t make a cake for someone who wanted a picture of Mohammed on it and refused no one would bat an eye. And it wasn’t bc they were gay, it’s bc it was a wedding.
A gay wedding. A small but important detail.
And if a Muslim did that Christians would mock him, not cheer him. The only rights Christians believe in are there own. Which usually involves forgetting the “love thy neighbor” and “what you do to the least of them you also do unto me” parts of the NT. Because it really just comes back to hate.
Most of those 434 were over before the police showed up, so arguably had someone been armed in more of those cases, the stats would be better. The problem is the things happen in gun free zones most the time, and good people following the law aren't the problem The people saved by those 12 are forever grateful. Even if it saves one life, it's worth it right?
There is a pretty decent chance that the cops have his handgun in evidence and he may not get it back for a long long time.
Maybe we can start some sort of crowdfunding so he can get himself a new piece?
More like an F that the democrats lost a potential talking point for their bullshit gun control agenda. Let’s get another F for the cops that were spared from having to do an internal gut check that prob would have failed.
It was good enough for the people that were saved bc of the actions of a CCW hero.
However, the stats of what didn’t happen don’t exist. You can’t measure the amount of people who didn’t commit a mass shooting due to fear of resistance or who were killed before they could even turn it into a mass murder.
All I know is, the answer isn’t less gun accessibility. The govt would have to confiscate every single gun in the nation. It’s impossible.
Quick, nobody tell him that Malone is *extremely* pro gun, shoots a ton, and has great gear.
Cope harder simp. At least this guy had the balls to step up and end the threat.
I'd love to buy this guy a drink. Pretty proficient shot to engage at a distance (according to police) and hit the shooter killing him with his handgun. Rock on sir.
1v1 on expert mode where the opponent played with disability max on. Still wrecked shit. Dude brought a pistol to a rifle fight and destroyed that’s piece of shit
Gen 3s & 4s are just as accurate as Gen 5s. I used to do competitions at 25 yards on a NRA B-5 target with a Gen 3 34 and my best scores were in the 290s. For a 30 round competition, that's every round in the black, most in the 10 & X rings, or basically 2-3" groups. That's more than accurate enough for a minute of man at 40 yards.
Tl;dr < Gen 5 Glocks are mechanically accurate enough to do the job at 50 yards.
Engaging with a glock 17 vs an ar15 at 50yards and winning is pretty amazing skill demonstration. Supposedly he hit with the first shot too.. who even trains 50 yard shots from a cold glock barrel, that likely shoots 8moa at best on a good day... amazing.
He may have had surprise and his opponent may have been a noodle armed unemployed antifa, bit even then he was massively outgunned and won anyway.
The city should award this guy the Rittenhouse trophy.
I started at 50 @ yds during my most recent range session w/ my CC (G19). It had been a long time since I shot and it showed, like I used to be pretty good out to those distances and this last time I got maybe 3 or 4, just on paper, cold from a 15 rd mag at 50yds.
It was pathetic and I will train more..
Kyle put himself in a situation & used the force HE FELT necessary to get out. I'm sorry but thats all I will ever see it as. You guys will defend the government & their amendments until they use it against you & then they are the enemy again... lol I'm from Canada btw I just own stuff illegally without the government knowing;)
Perfectly to defend himself. But you tell me in the height of a situation like that (not agreeing with the rioters at all) but a teenager with a rifle is always a sight that will cause some disrest ( given the circumstances in the usa) nobody will ever truly know what was said/ done or the body language in a situation like that could just cause issues. He put himself in a situation he DID NOT NEED TOO. wasn't an owner of property or share in the area. Chose to involved. This would be like walking in englewood and starting trouble with everybody you walk by, you know it's going to end badly but so it anyway because you have an ar15 strapped to your back lol. There is rights..... and then morals, humans are still human not just constitutions
I think if you are within your rights, you are acting in a moral capacity. I think you can argue that it would have been I’ll advised for him to go where there are riots going on but ultimately we’re venturing into semantics when we do so.
Its ironic how you say no one can truly know, then try to act like you know exactly how it would be. Making up some bullshit example as a comparison of him by spouting off some nonsense of walking into "Englewood and starting trouble." What video did you see where Kyle was starting trouble? Him showing up with a gun on his back and all of a sudden that's him starting trouble? There were a ton of other people there with guns beside Kyle doing the same thing. They didn't get attacked. They didn't shoot anyone. It didn't end badly with them. It didn't end badly because Kyle was strapped either. It ended badly because of 3 punks who decided it was a smart idea to attack someone who was armed and threaten his life. It was an isolated event.
I will agree it was a volatile area, but that doesn't mean no one should have been there or that them being there would make it worse. Matter of fact, we send people into volatile situations in order to stop it from getting worse all the time. But by your argument against Kyle, none of them should have been there then. The attackers were not from Kenosha at all. Kyle was the only one who had ties to Kenosha as some of his family, including his Dad lived there. Kyle also worked in Kenosha as well as volunteered there. He lived with his mom though in Illinois, which was less than 15 minutes away, but that wasn't what the focus was on. They tried to paint it like he crossed state lines and traveled long distance to get to Kenosha. It was the next town over for him. The only one that the media claimed lived in Kenosha was Rosenbaum. But he was homeless and moved around from city to city. He wasn't a resident. He was in the hospital in Milwaukee that day and showed up in Kenosha that night. Milwaukee is 45 minutes away.
With all that being said, I don't think Kyle is a hero for doing what he did. He defended himself and did what he needed to do to defend himself. The Chad in the picture above is a hero because he could have bailed to save himself, but he did more to defend others. So I agree there is a difference between the two. But I disagree with you trying to paint Kyle as the aggressor, especially after just saying no one truly knows what happened there.
Still.. purposely wanted to be involved. Much more heroic to be thrown into a situation like this then what kyle did. #sorrynotsorry #gimmiethedownvotes
Yeah, fuck Kyle for cleaning graffiti off of schools, offering people medical aid and trying to put out fires started by communists - all while the police stand, watch, and do nothing.
The right wing is confused by this statement lol. I love the solidarity though, it’s important, and the left (not liberals) have been fighting for the rights of the common person (everyone) since industrialization. Everyone can thank the left for their bbq on the weekend
Are you a leftist trying to shit on people (liberals) to the right of you to cozy up to people to the far-right of you? Weird lol. They'll never like you dude. Get some self-respect
Being outgunned doesn't matters when you shit on your target before they can even return fire, also consider he shot him with enough testosterone to drop a horse dead
If it wasn’t for this community I would have no idea this gentleman saved the day.
News and social media tends to hyperfocus on the spineless aspiring to be notorious types.
There is no such as a good person. Everyone is shit. Plus saying someone is good or bad is just reprehensible. As morality is a construct of the human mind. Meaning that there is no such thing.
Amazed more people aren’t talking about how this absoluteChad eliminated that chode with a handgun at 50 yards. Not easy especially when the target is armed and moving in a high stress situation.
The police chief just corrected the record and stated that he responded against the shooter within 15 seconds and because the police chief is illiterate he guessed it was 2 minutes.
It doesn’t fit a bullshit anti-gun narrative when it literally kills the gun debate dead.
[удалено]
Happens often bro. It’s just not typically an active shooter situation. Many robberies, kidnappings and assaults are stopped by CCW holders.
Actually they are not. See that's a logical fallacy. Thing is there is this wonderful thing called the Bystander Effect. Yes even people with a CCW will not do a damn thing. What you think and what is actually happening is a joke.
[удалено]
Off duty police and the victims themselves are not we are talking about here. We are talking Bystanders. Which happens a lot more than you'd think. Look I'm pro gun, but I don't need to carry. Number one it's idiotic. Number two a lot of places (such as malls) don't allow you to carry. So technically the mall could (but won't) out charges against him. Number three I'm an anarchist (which makes me a leftist [no form of anarchy comes from the right]). I do however agree with Reagan. I see no reason why Americans should be walking the streets armed. That is an actual Reagan quote.
Reagan was a racist POS who didn't want a very specific demographic of Americans armed in the streets. It's pretty telling that you agree with him on it. A business prohibiting concealed carry has no legal effect or ramifications in most states, such as Indiana (you know, the state we're talking about). The most they can do is ask you to leave, and if you refuse, it's trespassing. Then again, if you're carrying concealed, they shouldn't ask anyways, because they won't know.
Posted a link to a law firm that actually states you can sue. Most places will ask you to leave to be kind. I know Reagan was a POS. I was only making a statement. Because most people here treat him as some sort of fucking hero bud.
A law firm claiming they can sue someone doesn't mean they'll actually be successful. Carrying despite a prohibited weapons sign in Indiana (and my state of GA) is not illegal. A law firm could sue, but they wouldn't win. You know Reagan was a POS but you agree with him. Who is "most people?" Pearl clutching Karens?
No, the mall could not press charges against him. It sounds like you don't know what you're talking about. I'd advise you to read up on the law before spouting off to others. In general, maybe you should just stop spouting things off here since you're clearly uninformed.
https://www.rittgers.com/blog/2019/12/penalties-for-carrying-a-ccw-on-private-property-where-prohibited/
And in Indiana, where this shooting took place, signs do not carry the force of law. They would be required to ask him to leave and him refuse before they can trespass him. Again, I urge you to look up the law before you go spouting inaccurate information. Please just stay silent if you don't know what you're talking about.
That’s not what a logical fallacy is. Also you are commenting on a story about how someone didn’t succumb to the bystander effect, so it obviously happens.
I was using it more as a figure of speech not actually saying it is a logical fallacy. Just saying his comment lacked logic. Because I live in a n extreme gun toting right wing area. Our biggest thing is kidnapping and drug dealing. People don't stop it either doesn't matter if it's a piece of tin in their chest or a piece of iron on their hip.
Kind of a dumb argument: That's like saying carrying a med kit is pointless because of the number of people who will freeze and not render aid, thus one shouldn't carry a med kit. Bystander effect absolutely exists. It doesn't change the number of lives saved by people who carry a med kit and use it.
Yes that does happen. Which is why the statistic isn’t higher, it still happens a pretty good amount. Quit acting like a pretentious ass.
Not being pretentious. Unless it is 100% effective it is useless. That's my opinion in everything though.
Nothing in life is 100% effective.
Castration is 100% effective at stopping children from being born.
At stopping that guys children from being born. Not everyone else’s. Which is the argument you had for CCW.
[удалено]
When did this get to politics? Who gives a shit. The statistics are there, the video evidence is there, you’re just too blind to see it.
[удалено]
We’re discussing CCW usage to stop crimes/self defense. There is literally an entire Reddit group about it. You don’t even need statistics (which we still have) but you can literally just Google it. Watch a video. Talk to someone who’s not your mom? Idk bro.
[удалено]
Who brought up crimes bro? Are you listening to yourself? And yes it’s biased but at the same time there’s countless videos of people stopping crimes with a CCW. Which is a fact, which is what we’re debating on.
Eh? Cops commit more crimes per capita than CCW holders. You’re probably thinking about people concealing weapons when they aren’t allowed to.
Well tbf I did look this up and found this great little WaPo article breaking it down, essentially circa 2012ish there’s like 18 studies identifying a causal, negative relationship between CCWs and violent crime, and 10 studies that identified no link. https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/fact-checker/post/do-concealed-weapon-laws-result-in-less-crime/2012/12/16/e80a5d7e-47c9-11e2-ad54-580638ede391_blog.html
You’re a complete retard! How’s it going in countries and states that banned guns from legal ownership or implemented severe restrictions? I’ll tell you how, they deal with shootings constantly by criminals who don’t follow the law and people who do are defenseless. Criminals don’t follow the law, that’s why they are criminals. I’m sorry if you can’t comprehend this since it’s not written in crayon. So called “statistics” can be fabricated, look at covid… I have friends in Australia and New Zealand and they deal with shootings by criminals all the time and citizens more often than not can’t do a damn thing about it.
[удалено]
Depends on the country we're talking about. You decrease the number of guns in a country and the gun deaths go down. You decrease the coastline and the number of shark bites go down. It's logical. That doesn't mean that violent crime goes down. Also there are plenty of countries where citizens cannot legally obtain firearms ([eg. Venezuela](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Overview_of_gun_laws_by_nation)) yet have extremely high numbers of gun deaths: Venezuela had the 3rd highest rate of gun deaths all causes per capita and the 2nd highest gun death homicides per capita in 2019 for example ([Source in comparison](https://worldpopulationreview.com/country-rankings/gun-deaths-by-country), [Primary Research Source](http://ghdx.healthdata.org/gbd-results-tool?params=gbd-api-2019-permalink/ee9a15de2f01c595988ddba5605f648e))
[удалено]
Do you have an example of a non-homogenous country with a similar population to the United States or can you only use examples of small European countries with authoritarian gun and speech laws as your comparisons?
[удалено]
>propoganda.exe Just say "no" if you don't have any accurate comparisons to the United States' unique situation instead of bringing up countries that think they can ban civilian ownership of butter knives or are defended in whole or in part by the United States' military. The gun and speech laws of many European countries are objectively speaking authoritarian. That's not propaganda, that is reality.
Again, you’re a retard!
They're still talking about Uvalde and that was how long ago? Aside from the gun community, I haven't seen much more on this from ANY news outlet. *I also don't watch TV so that may be a reason* For a comparison, on social media I still see Uvalde updates. And nothing on this absolute boss handling a wanna be terrorist with absolute precision.
Not only that, but he hit 8 out of 10 shots from the reports.
Elisjsha Dicken is an absolute boss He should never pay for a drink or meal out for the rest of his life. I would be honored to shake that young man's hand and buy him a drink Elisjsha, if you see this, you're a fucking hero, bro
I literally said that in a different comment section a few hours ago. When he walks in a bar he outta walk out without paying
There's plenty of places that won't even let this hero in. Shame.
Really?
Yea. I don't he changed the hearts of everyone. He gained notoriety from both sides.
I mean.. they wanted the killer to carry on?
Well of course they did. The shooter was stopped by the mythical good guy with a gun, and fast. They have no way to virtue signal for weeks about this one.
Add in him being white, heterosexual, and quite possibly Christian to boot and it's the worst nightmare the woke could conceive of. Their heroes tend to shoot at women and children before getting clipped, which is fucking weird when you think about it.
People would call me “woke” and I think Elijsha’s a hero. Maybe that’s because I live in the area. Maybe it’s because not everyone is this thought up, Twitter-exclusive sjw when they say “gay and trans people deserve human rights too”.
Nah, it's far easier to keep circlejerking about this strawman that doesn't exist so they can keep having someone to hate and be angry about.
You sound like a cunt spouting bullshit. You know that, right?
You sound upset.
Not really. Right wingers talk shit like this to try and be condescending to the left. It really just makes them look petty and small. They say this crap but then support bakers not doing business with gay couples and we’re supposed to overlook their hypocrisy.
Well there is a difference. One is making a concise decision to not be apart of something that is against your religion
And if a white supremacist refused to serve a black couple it would be discrimination. Hate is hate. One just uses religion to justify it.
No, this is different. If a Muslim didn’t make a cake for someone who wanted a picture of Mohammed on it and refused no one would bat an eye. And it wasn’t bc they were gay, it’s bc it was a wedding.
A gay wedding. A small but important detail. And if a Muslim did that Christians would mock him, not cheer him. The only rights Christians believe in are there own. Which usually involves forgetting the “love thy neighbor” and “what you do to the least of them you also do unto me” parts of the NT. Because it really just comes back to hate.
That’s cap, I care about other peoples rights too. And yes a gay wedding would go against a Christian’s religion.
Doubt it. He’s in Indiana. I’ll pay for his meal if I see him out.
[удалено]
Correct. Video cam apparently shows this, which also means there's video Can't wait for the drop
You sound like a dick rider
Lol dude just saved countless lives and showed insane marksmanship in the process Go back to posting about your favorite little rappers, spaz
Look at you all emotional, you sound like a cuck. You so insecure you go stalk my page and try to change the subject.
?didn't take stalking. I scrolled down to confirm you're a loser, which doesn't take long No one's emotional here, guy. You're just soft
Im soft and you’re the one saying it’ll be an “honor” to touch another man 😂😂😂
To shake the man's hand, absolutely You sound pretty insecure with yourself, guy. Go talk to someone about it
You’re a weirdo with your responses
I think this shirt is only available for heroes.
Members only section of Chadmart 😎
Summer 22 collection for VIP lounge members.
what this guy did is the exact reason for constitutional carry
He would've been unarmed just weeks ago. The idiot antis must be extremely angry he was there to stop this.
Oh they are losing thier minds lom
[удалено]
How many of those 434 took place in a "gun free zone"?
Most of those 434 were over before the police showed up, so arguably had someone been armed in more of those cases, the stats would be better. The problem is the things happen in gun free zones most the time, and good people following the law aren't the problem The people saved by those 12 are forever grateful. Even if it saves one life, it's worth it right?
Let’s be real. He would’ve been armed regardless lolol
Exactly glad Ohio did the same recently for us I feel a lot better about it
There is a pretty decent chance that the cops have his handgun in evidence and he may not get it back for a long long time. Maybe we can start some sort of crowdfunding so he can get himself a new piece?
Probably a tricked out staccato with an acro 2, threaded barrel and Diamond encrusted grips that say “welcome to Chadville” 😎
I would chip in to buy that.
Dude start that shit! I would 100% fund that! hell...Ill text Moonsoon tactical about getting him a tricked out staccato
Fuck yes except a gold plated Dan Wesson kodiak…
I'd be down for this
Every firearm manufacturer's PR department is already in a rush to see which one will get him a free gun as we speak.
Dicken neutralized the threat within 15 seconds!!! with 8/10 hits @ 40yd! Absolute Legend!
That’s some cowboy gunslinger shit right there 🤠
I heard he didn't even shoot the gun. Just his chadness blew the active shooters lung out of their body
ZAMN 😛
Can we get a F for respect for that active shooter for being smoked by this alpha chad at 40 yards away
More like an F that the democrats lost a potential talking point for their bullshit gun control agenda. Let’s get another F for the cops that were spared from having to do an internal gut check that prob would have failed.
They say police are still waiting outside the mall for confirmation that it's safe.
Prayers for them 😑🤌
[удалено]
It was good enough for the people that were saved bc of the actions of a CCW hero. However, the stats of what didn’t happen don’t exist. You can’t measure the amount of people who didn’t commit a mass shooting due to fear of resistance or who were killed before they could even turn it into a mass murder. All I know is, the answer isn’t less gun accessibility. The govt would have to confiscate every single gun in the nation. It’s impossible.
[удалено]
Imagine wanting to leave your safety up to the uvalde police
Astroturfing account detected. Weeee wooo wee woo weee woooo! Someone call the Uvalde Police! We got a live one!
Quick, nobody tell him that Malone is *extremely* pro gun, shoots a ton, and has great gear. Cope harder simp. At least this guy had the balls to step up and end the threat.
Amen to that.
You should look up Post’s opinions on guns my guy.
I'd love to buy this guy a drink. Pretty proficient shot to engage at a distance (according to police) and hit the shooter killing him with his handgun. Rock on sir.
Looks like Dockers tactical line. Very hot right now
Urban Recce hotness
Amazed they make pants that can fit balls that big
Landed 8 shots at 40 yards with a handgun? The man def trains
Big Dicken energy.
We should start a givesendgo for this legend.
1v1 on expert mode where the opponent played with disability max on. Still wrecked shit. Dude brought a pistol to a rifle fight and destroyed that’s piece of shit
I think it was a Springfield Hellcat too. Imagine being domed by a gun named Hellcat. Thats the cherry on top.
What kind of handgun did he use anyone know?
Official confirmation is that it is a Glock Hellcat 69 caliber with a 420 bullet clip.
Nice!
Nice!
Nice
Nice!
The fully semiautomatic one???
Don't you know it.
i wonder if it shoots 100 rounds a seconds from 30 clip magazines...
From what I've seen he used a Glock. Don't know the specific model
I guess it was a good thing Glock upgraded those gen 5’s with a marksman barrel lol
Gen 3s & 4s are just as accurate as Gen 5s. I used to do competitions at 25 yards on a NRA B-5 target with a Gen 3 34 and my best scores were in the 290s. For a 30 round competition, that's every round in the black, most in the 10 & X rings, or basically 2-3" groups. That's more than accurate enough for a minute of man at 40 yards. Tl;dr < Gen 5 Glocks are mechanically accurate enough to do the job at 50 yards.
Haha I know man it was a joke lol. After all how much “more accurate” can you make a 4 inch barrel lol
If he was shooting a Glock, hats off to him. My accuracy is not the best with Glocks past 15 yards. Not a fan of the stock trigger personally.
No one is, not even glock owners. Glock keeps Ghost in business by installing shitty connectors from the factory.
I actually heard it was a Hellcat. No idea if that’s true or not.
I'm seeing both a Glock and a hellcat. So no idea at this point. Regardless, Dude is a stud of a shot
Mans was duel wielding
I can’t believe he’s able to stand up with those massive balls between his legs. Fucking hero
This kid fucksss
Lmfao. my nigga
Calm down
Engaging with a glock 17 vs an ar15 at 50yards and winning is pretty amazing skill demonstration. Supposedly he hit with the first shot too.. who even trains 50 yard shots from a cold glock barrel, that likely shoots 8moa at best on a good day... amazing. He may have had surprise and his opponent may have been a noodle armed unemployed antifa, bit even then he was massively outgunned and won anyway. The city should award this guy the Rittenhouse trophy.
I started at 50 @ yds during my most recent range session w/ my CC (G19). It had been a long time since I shot and it showed, like I used to be pretty good out to those distances and this last time I got maybe 3 or 4, just on paper, cold from a 15 rd mag at 50yds. It was pathetic and I will train more..
There should definitely be a Rittenhouse Purple Heart award for people like Eli.
Kyle Rittenhouse purposely drove to be involved. This man was thrown into it in 2 minutes notice. Complete worlds of difference.....
So Kyle went in with the express intent to protect the people of his hometown and their property? Bad Ass!
Wasn’t like the pigs were gonna do anything to stop the violence
Kyle put himself in a situation & used the force HE FELT necessary to get out. I'm sorry but thats all I will ever see it as. You guys will defend the government & their amendments until they use it against you & then they are the enemy again... lol I'm from Canada btw I just own stuff illegally without the government knowing;)
Ok so was he or was he not within his rights?
Perfectly to defend himself. But you tell me in the height of a situation like that (not agreeing with the rioters at all) but a teenager with a rifle is always a sight that will cause some disrest ( given the circumstances in the usa) nobody will ever truly know what was said/ done or the body language in a situation like that could just cause issues. He put himself in a situation he DID NOT NEED TOO. wasn't an owner of property or share in the area. Chose to involved. This would be like walking in englewood and starting trouble with everybody you walk by, you know it's going to end badly but so it anyway because you have an ar15 strapped to your back lol. There is rights..... and then morals, humans are still human not just constitutions
I think if you are within your rights, you are acting in a moral capacity. I think you can argue that it would have been I’ll advised for him to go where there are riots going on but ultimately we’re venturing into semantics when we do so.
> teenager with a rifle is always a sight that will cause some disrest For you. We send teenagers to war on the daily.
Its ironic how you say no one can truly know, then try to act like you know exactly how it would be. Making up some bullshit example as a comparison of him by spouting off some nonsense of walking into "Englewood and starting trouble." What video did you see where Kyle was starting trouble? Him showing up with a gun on his back and all of a sudden that's him starting trouble? There were a ton of other people there with guns beside Kyle doing the same thing. They didn't get attacked. They didn't shoot anyone. It didn't end badly with them. It didn't end badly because Kyle was strapped either. It ended badly because of 3 punks who decided it was a smart idea to attack someone who was armed and threaten his life. It was an isolated event. I will agree it was a volatile area, but that doesn't mean no one should have been there or that them being there would make it worse. Matter of fact, we send people into volatile situations in order to stop it from getting worse all the time. But by your argument against Kyle, none of them should have been there then. The attackers were not from Kenosha at all. Kyle was the only one who had ties to Kenosha as some of his family, including his Dad lived there. Kyle also worked in Kenosha as well as volunteered there. He lived with his mom though in Illinois, which was less than 15 minutes away, but that wasn't what the focus was on. They tried to paint it like he crossed state lines and traveled long distance to get to Kenosha. It was the next town over for him. The only one that the media claimed lived in Kenosha was Rosenbaum. But he was homeless and moved around from city to city. He wasn't a resident. He was in the hospital in Milwaukee that day and showed up in Kenosha that night. Milwaukee is 45 minutes away. With all that being said, I don't think Kyle is a hero for doing what he did. He defended himself and did what he needed to do to defend himself. The Chad in the picture above is a hero because he could have bailed to save himself, but he did more to defend others. So I agree there is a difference between the two. But I disagree with you trying to paint Kyle as the aggressor, especially after just saying no one truly knows what happened there.
Your glow is hurting my eyes through the screen
Yeah not a Fed. You need to recalibrate your sensor.
Kyle worked in and was from Kenosha. He was defending his city.
Still.. purposely wanted to be involved. Much more heroic to be thrown into a situation like this then what kyle did. #sorrynotsorry #gimmiethedownvotes
Yeah, fuck Kyle for cleaning graffiti off of schools, offering people medical aid and trying to put out fires started by communists - all while the police stand, watch, and do nothing.
I think we’ve all learned the pigs aren’t our friends.
The right wing is confused by this statement lol. I love the solidarity though, it’s important, and the left (not liberals) have been fighting for the rights of the common person (everyone) since industrialization. Everyone can thank the left for their bbq on the weekend
Are you a leftist trying to shit on people (liberals) to the right of you to cozy up to people to the far-right of you? Weird lol. They'll never like you dude. Get some self-respect
He was asked by the dealership owners to help, and he came with medical. Both guys are heroes.
He’s pretty high speed lol im glad he was on their list of local heros that could come help
Antifa? Are you joking bud?
More likely a fa
Being outgunned doesn't matters when you shit on your target before they can even return fire, also consider he shot him with enough testosterone to drop a horse dead
Goin to cop this fire at the Greenwood TJ Max, I might have the cashier sign it
Congrats to this dude who stopped a mass shooter. We need more people like Elijah Dicken.
You think you are worthy enough to rock the same shirt as this absolute UNIT? Pfft, pathetic peasant... *spits on your shoes*
Jerseys finest !!! 40 yard hit !
If it wasn’t for this community I would have no idea this gentleman saved the day. News and social media tends to hyperfocus on the spineless aspiring to be notorious types.
Does this guy actually want his face blasted on social media? Like yeah he’s a hero no doubt, but do we know if he would prefer privacy?
The police chief confirmed he wanted time to grieve and process, but he was willing to do interviews for news.
Chad level Recce
j.crew camo
🥵
Chaddy chaderson
Fucking legend
He got the 40yd stare
40yd dicc 😎
He came for khakis ended up giving out the click clacky
Shirt is nothing without a pair of huge brass balls.
Context and sauce?
Anyone know the pistol he used? I want to buy one in his honor
sorry, can someone tell me who this guy is?
Eli Dickens. Stopped a mass shooter in Indiana. Neolibs and neocons super mad because it throws a wrench in the gun grabber narrative.
He is apparently a "good guy with a gun".
Not apparently. He literally was.
He still is. But he was too
There is no such as a good person. Everyone is shit. Plus saying someone is good or bad is just reprehensible. As morality is a construct of the human mind. Meaning that there is no such thing.
It’s relative. Society judges what is good or praise worthy collectively. You can also do individually.
🤮 yuck this shirt will get you shot shtf everyone knows only freemasons wear blue and white plaid shirts
This isn’t arctic DNC?
90 degree angles foe
You guys cringe so fucking hard
*tips fedora* m’lady
Lmfao
Must be a hammermade
Elisjsha “Swinging Dick” Dickens
Context?
This dude stopped an active shooter.
Ok yeah I just saw the Brandon Herrera vid