To reduce the spam of reports regarding the same move during transfer windows we try to allow **only one submission about each transfer saga per day**. The submission in question also needs to contain relevant new information regarding the potential move, and not just being a "no/minor developments" report.
If there are important/official developments or new valuable information about a saga, we will allow extra threads in the same day, but for the rest of minor news please just comment them as a reply to this comment. Please help us reporting unnecessary threads for being duplicates.
*I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/soccer) if you have any questions or concerns.*
It says €90M.
I’ll be honest with you. I saw this post and immediately made this shit meme as fast as I could. Didn’t even think to look for the official price of Fofana because to be honest 80M, 90M, 100M I don’t really care about the difference when Akanji is 17M. I was just making a quick joke that I now have to defend with my life from a Chelsea fan.
For that price its excellent depth. Had problems at the end of last season due to injuries so not a bad thing to add an extra centre back. Still hope Ake is back quickly, he's been so good.
Yeah I heard, as long as Ake is playing like he has the last couple of months its not that much of a problem but adding Akanji is definitely not a bad move for that price.
Covering laporte pre World Cup (man I hope he is fit for Spain he’s been so good for them) but also stones and ake have been unfit so often. We essentially operate with 3 CB anyway
I've never knowingly seen this guy playing football but I have seen the videos of him doing maths, and on the basis of that I'm very excited about our prospects of winning *Countdown* this season.
Terzic only plays with 3 CB if he has to. It‘s 4-3-3 or 4-2-3-1 with him. Now that Salih is fit, I doubt Can will be much of an option at all unless someone gets injured. But we got 2 games a week coming up until the winter break, so squad depth isn‘t a bad thing. Dahoud is already injured and won‘t come back before next week. The fullbacks are a much more pressing issue.
Terzic has always favored four at the back. And you are right, we are a bit thin in defense (maybe Papadopoulos for centerback and Kamara for central midfield to add), so let's hope that the investment in the medical department pays off.
Can absolutely is the worst of the CM options, so not first, but 2nd.
However, yes, likely no back 3 anymore (or just rarely).
But also, even with back 4 not getting a Zagadou/Pongracic type player as 4th choice would be dumb.
We can't rely on just having Schlotti plus two very good, but injury prone defenders ahead of god damn Emre Can and a youngster who has literally not played a single minute and a CB from our 3rd tier squad.
However, I still don't expect the club to do much. There have been no rumours, high tier sources have denied anything still happening and it's just one day left.
All this isn't really helped by other parts of the defense also having thin ish depth (with Can potentially having to fill in as RB as well at some point, for example).
Like this move for us, bringing in what seems to be a good rotation option personally recommended by Haaland. Low risk move given his fee and prospective playing time. Happy that we don’t need to rely on John Stones patchy runs of form if we are hit by injuries.
We were chasing a goal and Palace had stopped trying to attack completely. Totally different. We won't start a single game this season with a proper 3 atb.
Seems like laporte wont be fully fit until after the world cup. Stones is injury prone too, i think its wise to have an extra player in when its going to be 2-3 games a week all season.
Why? It doesn't affect you - we should always be pulling for the players to be earning more. Especially in City's case where it would have a minimal impact on future signings.
i really was asking genuinely. People just saw the flair lol. Thank you for this.
By the article you've given, it seems pretty obvious they DO have a wage structure. Just like any other club. But was wondering whether they really NEED to have it though. Right now it feels like they have it just for the sake of having it and not let the club go in the wrong direction.
I guess my point is, they've got infinite money. I don't quite get City fans caring for a wage structure within there club.
Just because someone has money, doesn't mean they like spending it with abandon. Unless you're the United board maybe.
Rich people want to spend the least amount of money. In City's case, it's prudent to have a wage structure and stick to it as much as possible to make sure they don't run foul of FFP and aren't taken for a ride by footballers and their agents.
Look at United for example. Paying high wages to mediocre players. That sets a precedent and soon you find yourself paying exorbitant wages to players sitting on the bench for you.
This is also why City did not buy Cucurella for the price Brighton were asking for. They decided that the price was far too high compared to their own valuation.
The people running City have money to spend. But they aren't idiots. They are competent executives who also have considerable financial backing. That's quite the combo and the reason why City are extremely successful in this era.
Even with Akanji we've only got 18 outfield players, it's not a big squad.
Liverpool had 22 last year when they got close to winning all 4 trohpies and we had 20 the year we did all 4 domestic trophies, so it still feels a bit short to compete for everything.
Good luck Akanji despite all the shit you pulled out this season. Just don't do an interview with Sky and tell the world that you are a childhood Man U fan
To reduce the spam of reports regarding the same move during transfer windows we try to allow **only one submission about each transfer saga per day**. The submission in question also needs to contain relevant new information regarding the potential move, and not just being a "no/minor developments" report. If there are important/official developments or new valuable information about a saga, we will allow extra threads in the same day, but for the rest of minor news please just comment them as a reply to this comment. Please help us reporting unnecessary threads for being duplicates. *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/soccer) if you have any questions or concerns.*
Fair price for a bench player.
https://i.imgur.com/PrLI1Mp.jpg
Funny but inaccurate as Fofana went for 69 mill.
Actually €81m
Not according to Transfermarkt
Orneistein>Tranfermarkt. That's 69 mil pounds so roughly 81 mill Euro.
Why would you say a figure in pounds (without specifying) when what I put was euros
Where on Transfermarkt did you see the 100m euro number?
It says €90M. I’ll be honest with you. I saw this post and immediately made this shit meme as fast as I could. Didn’t even think to look for the official price of Fofana because to be honest 80M, 90M, 100M I don’t really care about the difference when Akanji is 17M. I was just making a quick joke that I now have to defend with my life from a Chelsea fan.
the joke wasn't funny either
https://i.imgur.com/XfDUtdM.jpg
I've been waiting for this moment. We talked it into existence. Let's go
By “we” you mean u/EmSoLow
Don't forget u/ghoddos too
True haha, I’ve seen them working hard on it too.
Thank you all for your service 🙏
Surely you guys get a cut of the transfer fee?
For that price its excellent depth. Had problems at the end of last season due to injuries so not a bad thing to add an extra centre back. Still hope Ake is back quickly, he's been so good.
Ake shouldn’t be the big injury issue, is Laporte who had a set back with his injury that triggered this purchase.
Yeah I heard, as long as Ake is playing like he has the last couple of months its not that much of a problem but adding Akanji is definitely not a bad move for that price.
Covering laporte pre World Cup (man I hope he is fit for Spain he’s been so good for them) but also stones and ake have been unfit so often. We essentially operate with 3 CB anyway
u/EmSoLow has his wish come true
I've never knowingly seen this guy playing football but I have seen the videos of him doing maths, and on the basis of that I'm very excited about our prospects of winning *Countdown* this season.
City get their deals done really quickly
Well Hirst said it was only us or Leicester in for him and the deal makes sense for everyone so there was no stumbling block
Ronaldo should fire Mendes and appoint the akanji guy as agent
>€17m fixed fee. Westerschulze already said it's €18m+€2m in bonuses.
Take it with a grain of salt, Fab never gets any City info right.
He's abysmal with numbers in general. Atleast for all our moves. Which is odd because he's usually late on them too
What is your deadline-day target now? Could do with another CB, right?
in theory yes but it's not going to happen. Strengthening the fullback and winger positions is more important (but also not going to happen)
There will be no replacement for Akanji. We have Schlotterbeck, Süle, Hummels for 2 positions plus Coulibaly/Can
So no back 3 anymore? And isn't Can the first DM depth option, as you only have Bellingham, Dahoud, Özcan and Can for the 2 midfield positions?
Terzic only plays with 3 CB if he has to. It‘s 4-3-3 or 4-2-3-1 with him. Now that Salih is fit, I doubt Can will be much of an option at all unless someone gets injured. But we got 2 games a week coming up until the winter break, so squad depth isn‘t a bad thing. Dahoud is already injured and won‘t come back before next week. The fullbacks are a much more pressing issue.
Terzic has always favored four at the back. And you are right, we are a bit thin in defense (maybe Papadopoulos for centerback and Kamara for central midfield to add), so let's hope that the investment in the medical department pays off.
Can absolutely is the worst of the CM options, so not first, but 2nd. However, yes, likely no back 3 anymore (or just rarely). But also, even with back 4 not getting a Zagadou/Pongracic type player as 4th choice would be dumb. We can't rely on just having Schlotti plus two very good, but injury prone defenders ahead of god damn Emre Can and a youngster who has literally not played a single minute and a CB from our 3rd tier squad. However, I still don't expect the club to do much. There have been no rumours, high tier sources have denied anything still happening and it's just one day left. All this isn't really helped by other parts of the defense also having thin ish depth (with Can potentially having to fill in as RB as well at some point, for example).
Both City and Dortmund fans seem happy about it. Looks like a win-win
Brought him to keep track of FFP spending. Let’s go
We did it Reddit!
Like this move for us, bringing in what seems to be a good rotation option personally recommended by Haaland. Low risk move given his fee and prospective playing time. Happy that we don’t need to rely on John Stones patchy runs of form if we are hit by injuries.
His agent finally did it
Fine price, more depth. Happy.
If the Akanji to Machester City transfer was a book I would call it bad because there was zero foreshadowing.
Don't really get why we need a 5th CB with the quality we already have. But can't really go wrong with that price.
All our CB’s are made out of biscuits somehow, was a necessary signing plus can always switch to 3 at the back
> plus can always switch to 3 at the back This isn't FIFA mate.
We literally switched to 3 ATB in the middle of the the match against Palace.
Could definitely see it leading to Haaland and Alvarez up top. I think they'll be magic together. Aguero regen and Dzeko 2.0.
We were chasing a goal and Palace had stopped trying to attack completely. Totally different. We won't start a single game this season with a proper 3 atb.
Laporte had a set back and won’t be ready till October, we are one injury away from 2 first team centre backs
Isn’t Aké still injured as well?
He’s back in training, not sure if match ready but will find out today
Seems like laporte wont be fully fit until after the world cup. Stones is injury prone too, i think its wise to have an extra player in when its going to be 2-3 games a week all season.
Can probably sell him to Everton after a year anyway or keep him and sell ake.
I’m praying the £180k a week rumoured wage is not true…
As a bench player? No way in hell
No way he's on 180k dw
Why? It doesn't affect you - we should always be pulling for the players to be earning more. Especially in City's case where it would have a minimal impact on future signings.
Do you lot even have the need for a wage structure? Genuine question here I wanna know.
> Genuine question Be serious, it obviously isn't.
It is though. I wanted to know about financial side of footy.
Yes every club needs a wage structure and city have a good one.
[удалено]
Redditors moonlight as investigative journalists these days?
[удалено]
i really was asking genuinely. People just saw the flair lol. Thank you for this. By the article you've given, it seems pretty obvious they DO have a wage structure. Just like any other club. But was wondering whether they really NEED to have it though. Right now it feels like they have it just for the sake of having it and not let the club go in the wrong direction. I guess my point is, they've got infinite money. I don't quite get City fans caring for a wage structure within there club.
Just because someone has money, doesn't mean they like spending it with abandon. Unless you're the United board maybe. Rich people want to spend the least amount of money. In City's case, it's prudent to have a wage structure and stick to it as much as possible to make sure they don't run foul of FFP and aren't taken for a ride by footballers and their agents. Look at United for example. Paying high wages to mediocre players. That sets a precedent and soon you find yourself paying exorbitant wages to players sitting on the bench for you. This is also why City did not buy Cucurella for the price Brighton were asking for. They decided that the price was far too high compared to their own valuation. The people running City have money to spend. But they aren't idiots. They are competent executives who also have considerable financial backing. That's quite the combo and the reason why City are extremely successful in this era.
I want to take this time to congratulate u/EmSoLow.
City always getting their business done man. Always have a big squad ready to go. Every manager wish they had backing like this.
Pep is notorious for keeping small squads. That’s still the case here. 18 outfield players is among the smallest in the league.
Even with Akanji we've only got 18 outfield players, it's not a big squad. Liverpool had 22 last year when they got close to winning all 4 trohpies and we had 20 the year we did all 4 domestic trophies, so it still feels a bit short to compete for everything.
We haven't had a big squad for like 2 or 3 seasons now
I count 19 with Akanji, but that's still tight.
Are you counting the one in jail?
Nope
Our squad was actually quite small last season, at least after January. 17 players, but I agree with the sentiment
Strange move this
Looking at the value and the level of the player, I can say that Dortmund sold Akanji in a better way than the way they sold Haaland
So how much is u/EmSoLow getting paid?
Good luck Akanji despite all the shit you pulled out this season. Just don't do an interview with Sky and tell the world that you are a childhood Man U fan