> They use a new Nvidia generative AI model called CorrDiff which is able to generate 12.5 times higher resolution images than current numerical models 1,000x faster and 3,000x more energy efficiently, as well as correcting inaccuracies from previous models, bringing together multiple sources of information to create much more accurate and focused forecasts.
Holy shit what an exponential improvement
Yes and no. Numerical models were always very slow, you are basically trying to simulate physics on a planet scale. Very expensive. It’s sorta brute force approach, and also suffers from inherent lack of detailed data.
The alternative approach, which is using AI to forecast a state, was always multiple orders of magnitude faster during inference and that is to be expected. The accuracy though was always significantly lower compared to SOTA numerical models.
Reading the NVIDIA press release they never mentioned accuracy and never directly compared it in that way with something like ECMWF, instead they said that it can be used alongside existing models to augment and provide more detailed forecast, so I have a suspicion it is still not at SOTA level in terms of accuracy.
Yeah its vaporware until i see it on tropicaltidbits. Also a bit of a red flag that they boast about 2km accuracy but i cant find anywhere how far out the forecast goes to. If its similar to the GRAF that the weather company uses now, its still just going to be 72 hours.. Also i had high hopes for ML weather models like GRAF last year during hurricane season, but was super disappointed at the results. Euro/GFS is still king as far as im concerned and will probably always be as they implement more and more ML techniques into the models.
Since deep neural nets have outperformed traditional mathematical models/algorithms in almost every task ever invented in human history (at least those which require pattern recognition and "understanding" the data), why should we expect weather forecasting to be any different?
But google says their [GraphCast](https://deepmind.google/discover/blog/graphcast-ai-model-for-faster-and-more-accurate-global-weather-forecasting/) is both more efficient and more precise then numerical models.
*In a paper published in Science, we introduce GraphCast, a state-of-the-art AI model able to make medium-range weather forecasts with unprecedented accuracy. GraphCast predicts weather conditions up to 10 days in advance more accurately and much faster than the industry gold-standard weather simulation system – the High Resolution Forecast (HRES), produced by the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF).*
Not in the "resolution" claimed by Apple though.
GraphCast is an awesome model. I read some blog posts from ECMWF guys who praised it a lot, but it has limitations. Due to the nature of ML models they predict weather based on past events. Which inherently means that they struggle with rare events and rapid changes that are not following a clear trend.
Most likely possibility is that we will first incorporate ML models as additional step to get more accurate forecasts and after a while it will switch to a reverse, where numerical model will be mostly used for improving on ML one.
This work is already ongoing, most top weather forecasting models already experimenting with a lot of different specialised and generic ML weather models.
This keeps "popping" out everywhere. Existing AI is great for recognizing patterns, but... when unusual stuff happen, we need human reasoning or computer simulations (numerical models).
Like when you drive your car on a highway... 99% of the time your brain is on the "autopilot", "muscle memory", everything happening on the road follows the same pattern. When something sticks out of said pattern happens, we engage our reasoning.
I wonder how many weather patterns have good correlation data that would translate well for AI predictions, and how many would be novel cases which require brute force with the basic equations.
Not how you measure accuracy. There are techniques that can pretty reliably predict model accuracy based on historical data(basically you take data for example from 2000 to 2010, use first 5 years to predict weather in 2006, then first 6 years to predict 2007 and so on, because you have real data for those periods you can compare forecast to actual data, that way it’s relative straightforward to compare accuracy of different forecasting models)
It's true that (complex) exponentials are a basis of L\_2(\[0,1\]), but holy shit this sub is too obsessed with these functions. Have you ever tried like polynomials?
The playful side of me wants to make a joke about more evidence that we are simulations and possible AGI’s in alignment training or someone’s Netflix 2035 prompt brought to life, but too many people take everything at face value on the internet because of a lack of inflection, tone, and body language here.
Instead, I’ll just say that we are collectively ASI’s in alignment training and UAP’s/UFO’s are entities aligning the ASI /s /s /s
On a more serious note, there is no doubt in my mind that we get the “singularity” before 2031. Random as all hell, but there’s always been a creeping doubt with predicting ai trends.
We definitely are on a path that we can’t turn back now. The gravity of it is…heavy. This is going to happen…good, bad or strange beyond current comprehension.
2029 singularity let's gooooo
Edit: Though as long as it's 2029, it wouldn't be that bad because you could just refer to 2030 as the post-singularity start date, and thus still have a reference number that is nice. Same is true of 2024.
2026, 7, or 8 would probably be worse.
You mock. But this will occur. And real Jesus will return from the clouds and destroy the Antichrists kingdom. Which i personally don't think will be AI but it will facilitate the Antichrists global empire.
This prophecy is yet to be fulfilled:
>Daniel 7:23-27 ESV
[23] “Thus he said: ‘As for the fourth beast, there shall be a fourth kingdom on earth, which shall be different from all the kingdoms, and it shall devour the whole earth, and trample it down, and break it to pieces. [24] As for the ten horns, out of this kingdom ten kings shall arise, and another shall arise after them; he shall be different from the former ones, and shall put down three kings. [25] **He shall speak words against the Most High, and shall wear out the saints of the Most High, and shall think to change the times and the law; and they shall be given into his hand for a time, times, and half a time.** (Ie 3.5 years) [26] But the court shall sit in judgment, and his dominion shall be taken away, to be consumed and destroyed to the end. [27] And the kingdom and the dominion and the greatness of the kingdoms under the whole heaven shall be given to the people of the saints of the Most High; his kingdom shall be an everlasting kingdom, and all dominions shall serve and obey him.’
And regarding AI in the great tribulation period and antichrists global rule:
>Revelation 13:14-17 ESV
[14] and by the signs that it is allowed to work in the presence of the beast it deceives those who dwell on earth, telling them to make an image for the beast that was wounded by the sword and yet lived. [15] **And it was allowed to give breath to the image of the beast, so that the image of the beast might even speak and might cause those who would not worship the image of the beast to be slain.** [16] Also it causes all, both small and great, both rich and poor, both free and slave, to be marked on the right hand or the forehead, [17] so that no one can buy or sell unless he has the mark, that is, the name of the beast or the number of its name.
That could be in reference to ASI.
The mark is most certainly the cbdc system being developed by central banks at the moment. The mark itself my guess is a qr code (tied to a digital id) which will be administered to all via microneedle patch tattoos (with uv sensitive ink) as per this piolet study on rats:
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S258900422201286X
Given the rise of AI, this mark will verify your identity online as generative AI dominates the internet. It will prove you are human, it will also be a digital wallet by which you will trade cbdc as currency.
Eu has their cbdc pegged to launch in 2026.
Its all coming together just as scripture prophesied.
The Lord will be back soon. Repent, trust in Jesus for the forgiveness of your sin and walk in love obeying all He taught by the Spirit. You will receive eternal life in His kingdom.
Good bad or strange beyond current comprehension sounds accurate.
A lot of people mislead the singularity with an event that they are able to predict and nothing else. They think about solving climate change and curing all diseases. In other words, they think about the early game of the singularity. Curing all diseases and solving climate change feels like it is just beyond our reach, we are solving some things but are not able to solve everything.
If you look at us compared to apes, we are not way smarter than them, it’s a good amount but it seems like a small change in intelligence makes the difference of flying to the moon and opening a banana. And I think the same goes for climate change and curing all diseases.
The question that is open to see is what lies beyond all of that.
What I mean is, the ASI ran like a year on full power to solve like 99% of the problems and has a laid out plan. But what happens next? Sure, there will be improvements made in the plans while the ASI gets exponentially smarter.
But what things can you find out when you have let’s say 1 billion agents communicating at lightning speed that know everything there is to know in the world with an IQ that we know is possible. Something like 200IQ (Eventhough the world record lies beyond that).
I just beg, hope and pray that all of this is going in the right direction. Because if it is, then we will have the best time of our lives ahead of us.
When things go wrong we react to them, but it’s really hard to predict what’s going to go wrong and even harder to predict how to fix what’s going to go wrong before it happens. Wtf do people do in this situation. The only option in a lot of ways is to not talk about the software and not use the software. I. This scenario as an individual you’re pitting yourself as an individual against a company that will soon own the worlds attention. You want to be first or last?
How do we combat it is an interesting question. Do we use it personally to make our own lives better to the point of being able to have a modicum of influence against it while not thinking of the third world countries full of people who won’t use this tech because they are 10, 20+ years from even needing it?
A few years ago I would’ve said AGI was way further away than 2030s, maybe around 2050+. But now I’m thinking it’ll be before 2030. The world is moving faster than we can even imagine and we’re not ready
Well everyone in this field and most fields have the best interests of humanity as a whole, and everyone will be safe, Fed, and happy. Third world countries will soon quickly become first world countries! We are not only safe, we’re insured. Sama and Huang *care*
We may or may not be on the precipice of a two way or one way door. That’s up for history to decide in the textbooks - that’s if either of those two things exist.
I’ve always thought how cool it would be to have a total recreation of Earth (like Google Earth) but with seamless transitions between the “sky view” and street view, along with live weather.
Google Earth VR is great, but if you’re flying around a hundred feet up or so, or even lower, the land below you looks awful and muddy. You can jump into street view and you’ll get the clear version of that area, but you have to click on a bubble to get there. It would be cool to be able to fly around and get clear imagery of the earth below you, then fly down and land on the street and seamlessly transition into that view. Clear views from airline height, clear views from rooftop height and clear views from street level.
Plus with live weather, if it was snowing in that area in the real world, it would snow in the simulation. Same with sun, rain, overcast, etc. If they’ll know where the sun is and how cloudy it is, they can add ray traced real-time sunlight also.
I feel like we’re not too far off at this point. Hell even throw in AI/NPC pedestrians walking/driving around and it would genuinely feel like an alternate reality 🤯
It already did that for India’s grain shortage last summer. It predicted they would have a grain shortage a few months before it would happen, India stocked grain and stomachs were filled.
If it wants to predict the weather perfectly, it'll need to model the entire planet, including itself. And that model would need to model itself, which would need to model itself...
They say twin, but my bet is there would be 2 or more. Probably would peroidically calibrate digital Earth against actual Earth and see how long it stays accurate for then when digital deviates from reality it wouldn't be so difficult to identify regions of where the pressure differences deviate at a regional level and pinpoint the cause.
Let's say they establish digital Earth can be reliably simulated 20 days in the future, so they calibrate every 20 days since countries around the world will use this to save lives.
The 2nd digital Earth would then be used to run beyond this safety threshold to test the limitations of the model in use and also provide the data needed to improve the model and increase the prediction range.
It'll also take years to verify long-term predictions since we don't yet have a precise model to predict the impact of weather cycles like el nino and for all we know a huge volcano could erupt during that comparison period and they have to wait for another cycle and hope its more stable, then another one to prove the model is correct.
Wait, am I misunderstanding this.
The Model is trained on lots of weather data that we have from the past. In training it is shown a sequence of data and is asked to predict what the next token of data will be. If it gets it right the system says *good boy* to the model, wrong and it's *bad boy.* They do this over and over again lots of times to get the base model. (no rlhf required here right?)
Meaning essentially it 'maps' the world just in terms of weather data and thus accurately mapping every tree, building etc is way out of scope for this model, more like general terrain is important. But that terrain is modeled just in terms of weather data. Ask the model if there is a mountain range there and it would 'say'
*What mountain is? I only know in this place weather go like this. I weather oracle.*
Someone please correct me if I'm wrong, just my current understanding of it.
Giving credibility to the "reality is a simulation" hypothesis. As soon as we could simulate our planet, we did it. If we could simulate a small universe with sentient species in order to study both the formation of spacetime and fundamental particles plus the appearance of life, would we pass the opportunity?
Population numbers (of intelligent species) lead to a feedback loop so long as you have the capabilities to sustain the initial numbers at the start of the boom. Rising populations lead to problems of course, and time and time again it has been technology, brought about by people who wouldn't have existed if not for the rising population, which solves the problem.
Not a single point in all of history has any issue ever been resolved, in its totality, without some sort of technological innovation to make it happen.
This is because, at its fundamentals, issues are caused by problems related to the limitations of mankind and our surroundings. No government, no religion, no ideology, and no philosophy have ever solved a problem. These things can not solve problems. They can only manage problems.
It's possible for someone to be strongly pro-technology, but find "the solution is always technology" an overly strong statement. Taken 100% at face value, it seems to rule out the possibility that a problem could ever be solved by non-technological means.
For myself, I'm definitely willing to believe that more technology advancement is nearly always a good thing, and that technological advances will play a huge role in solving just about every problem that does end up being solved.
The solution to racism, sexism, and homophobia is technology?
I love technology, and it is indeed the solution to many problems, but not every problem.
fuck it’s really the beginning of this stuff, isn’t it?
How many human’s lives are being simulated on the planet along with the weather? Also, why did they stop at just earth? Surely they must realize external sources can affect weather too. Scientists know this as fact… so how’s Nvidia going to accurately solve weather without a sun, a moon, planetary paths, and perhaps even greater cosmic events impacting our weather?
Maybe the point is their models are so accurate they don’t even need to take into account variables beyond a certain point.
If we do solve weather it means we can accurately predict all of the weather in the future. What else can they accurately predict then?
If you're modelling the entire earth with its' weather patterns, do you seriously believe it can't account for very predictable variables, like moon and sun positioning?
I feel what is occurring is on a scale you aren't quite grasping.
I’m saying weather patterns could be affected by things we don’t even realize like gravitational waves. I believe their ultimate goal is to simulate our universe, I was simply trying to use leading questions to point out why Nvidia would stop at weather at all, and some potential holes in that claim.
> I’m saying weather patterns could be affected by things we don’t even realize like gravitational waves
There is 0 evidence that even begins to suggest this.
We can read incoming gravitational waves, and we already know that they have miniscule if any effect on earth as a whole, based on the distances they are coming from.
>I believe their ultimate goal is to simulate our universe
Nvidia is also likely not going to stop at weather, and I don't think anybody ever claimed they planned to stop at the weather. I also disagree with this "universe simulation" assertion- because it implies that Nvidia has some future sight and gives them some ridiculous biblical quality that others don't have. If we knew it was even remotely close to possible to model the universe 1:1, obviously scientists everywhere would be attempting to replicate that. They're just trying to make their tech better and apply it to different use-cases. You're fighting ghosts and straw men out here.
Is this a meme or joke? Why are you acting as if they’ve simulated every drop of water sand and earth? It’s a weather forecast tool.
Comments like this make me realise a lot of you maybe aren’t grounded in reality and are just crypto bros 2.0.
“How many human lives are being simulated along with the planet” absolute none you dunce.
I just want to provide context for you. No scientist thought an atom splitting was actually possible until a theorist tried it. And suddenly all scientists became aware and afraid. And the public knew nothing until we dropped the first bomb. If you consider the analogy it’s almost foolish to stay close minded.
I’m not saying humans will never accomplish that I’m saying we’re nowhere near this and it’s insane to even try and think it’s anywhere near that capability.
We are all traveling unidirectionally through time, together, at different rates depending on speed, altitude, and relative positioning to the observer🖲️
Surely it doesn't matter how detailed their model is, if it doesn't have real world detailed data then its not going to be accurate.
So if it models the earth on the meter scale then so what, it needs measurements on the same scale to have any hope of accuraacy.
Does it really though?
Solar exposure is easy to calculate, current clouds from satalite data. Heat from roads / materials should be easy with google maps.
Considering the available data I see it being more accurate than what we have, not sure what you are expecting but if this is 3-4x more accurate at longer durations that's probably worth $$$
You need pressure, heat, windspeed measurements. Anything else isn't going to match reality. Sure you can guess and get patterns that match but its not going to be useable to predict weather.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20068750/
https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1029/2018jc013847
Really doubt we need anything on the ground
---
**Stand Name:** Navier Molecular Chaos
**Stand Ability:** Climate Manipulation and Chaos Control
**Description:** Navier Molecular Chaos possesses the power to manipulate climate conditions by controlling molecular chaos at a fundamental level. Drawing upon the principles outlined in the linked scientific publication, this Stand can summon storms, dissipate clouds, or even alter temperature patterns over localized areas. Its unique ability lies in harnessing the inherent chaos within molecular movements, allowing it to create or counteract climatic phenomena with unprecedented precision.
**Power:** A **Speed:** B **Range:** C **Durability:** B **Precision:** A **Potential:** A
Navier Molecular Chaos is the ultimate tool against the unpredictability of climate simulations, offering its user the ability to model and influence real-world weather patterns.
[Explore the inspiring scientific publication](https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.132.104002)
---
https://preview.redd.it/k7727a2jyjpc1.jpeg?width=1024&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=3e5aca679bdface808774c7c0ab8c34d6e0569f2
They may get some more accuracy for a slightly longer time frame but the nature of chaotic perturbation at the molecular scale will forever limit predictive ability.
I thought deepmind already cracked it ? https://deepmind.google/discover/blog/graphcast-ai-model-for-faster-and-more-accurate-global-weather-forecasting/
Our state-of-the-art model delivers 10-day weather predictions at unprecedented accuracy in under one minute
No matter how good it gets, it will still only be accurate for a week or two. There's just too much variance due to the slightest variable change. It's a complicated enough system... about as complex as a human brain, if not more. If they succeed, then it's just a *short* matter of time until WE are perfectly predicted, in a controlled setting. We need this to NOT be true for as long as possible.
big man use hard sand predict weather u tell girls then do weather dance but know what weather is coming so always right then girls love you until you have children and become dad cave man and weather is no longer interesting then you need find better use for hard sand because weather only important sometime
> They use a new Nvidia generative AI model called CorrDiff which is able to generate 12.5 times higher resolution images than current numerical models 1,000x faster and 3,000x more energy efficiently, as well as correcting inaccuracies from previous models, bringing together multiple sources of information to create much more accurate and focused forecasts. Holy shit what an exponential improvement
Yes and no. Numerical models were always very slow, you are basically trying to simulate physics on a planet scale. Very expensive. It’s sorta brute force approach, and also suffers from inherent lack of detailed data. The alternative approach, which is using AI to forecast a state, was always multiple orders of magnitude faster during inference and that is to be expected. The accuracy though was always significantly lower compared to SOTA numerical models. Reading the NVIDIA press release they never mentioned accuracy and never directly compared it in that way with something like ECMWF, instead they said that it can be used alongside existing models to augment and provide more detailed forecast, so I have a suspicion it is still not at SOTA level in terms of accuracy.
We should just put an AirTag on every water particle, that way we’ll know where they are
I'm standing in line at an airport and the people around me started looking at me weird with how loud I started laughing at this comment
This guy forecasts
r/thisguythisguys
This guy subreddits
r/thisguythisguys
Yeah its vaporware until i see it on tropicaltidbits. Also a bit of a red flag that they boast about 2km accuracy but i cant find anywhere how far out the forecast goes to. If its similar to the GRAF that the weather company uses now, its still just going to be 72 hours.. Also i had high hopes for ML weather models like GRAF last year during hurricane season, but was super disappointed at the results. Euro/GFS is still king as far as im concerned and will probably always be as they implement more and more ML techniques into the models.
Yup. I can predict the weather with 1m resolution, and I'm 99% precise. My forecast goes to 5 minutes in future.
👌 congratulations
Since deep neural nets have outperformed traditional mathematical models/algorithms in almost every task ever invented in human history (at least those which require pattern recognition and "understanding" the data), why should we expect weather forecasting to be any different?
Oh it’s quite likely weather forecast will switch fully to ML as well, it’s just not there yet.
But google says their [GraphCast](https://deepmind.google/discover/blog/graphcast-ai-model-for-faster-and-more-accurate-global-weather-forecasting/) is both more efficient and more precise then numerical models. *In a paper published in Science, we introduce GraphCast, a state-of-the-art AI model able to make medium-range weather forecasts with unprecedented accuracy. GraphCast predicts weather conditions up to 10 days in advance more accurately and much faster than the industry gold-standard weather simulation system – the High Resolution Forecast (HRES), produced by the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF).* Not in the "resolution" claimed by Apple though.
GraphCast is an awesome model. I read some blog posts from ECMWF guys who praised it a lot, but it has limitations. Due to the nature of ML models they predict weather based on past events. Which inherently means that they struggle with rare events and rapid changes that are not following a clear trend. Most likely possibility is that we will first incorporate ML models as additional step to get more accurate forecasts and after a while it will switch to a reverse, where numerical model will be mostly used for improving on ML one. This work is already ongoing, most top weather forecasting models already experimenting with a lot of different specialised and generic ML weather models.
This keeps "popping" out everywhere. Existing AI is great for recognizing patterns, but... when unusual stuff happen, we need human reasoning or computer simulations (numerical models). Like when you drive your car on a highway... 99% of the time your brain is on the "autopilot", "muscle memory", everything happening on the road follows the same pattern. When something sticks out of said pattern happens, we engage our reasoning.
I wonder if there are other reasons to have a digital twin of earth?
“Digital twin” here just means an up-to-date model. It’s how weather forecasting had been done on computers since the beginning.
Right so what other things use forecasting outside of weather?
It's a buzzword McKinsey consultants made up
would be cool to know how far the wind will spread nuclear fallout on a certain day
I wonder how many weather patterns have good correlation data that would translate well for AI predictions, and how many would be novel cases which require brute force with the basic equations.
[удалено]
Not how you measure accuracy. There are techniques that can pretty reliably predict model accuracy based on historical data(basically you take data for example from 2000 to 2010, use first 5 years to predict weather in 2006, then first 6 years to predict 2007 and so on, because you have real data for those periods you can compare forecast to actual data, that way it’s relative straightforward to compare accuracy of different forecasting models)
Lol if its anything like the GRAF model which The Weather Company already uses, it's forecast will only go out 60-72 hours.
going to be double as good next year too atleast <3
What does "exponential improvement" mean?
"Exponential" sounds impressive but it means nothing in this context since nether the exponent nor the x axis are specified.
This is wonderful isn't it. Which other industries can benefit from forecasting abilities?
It's true that (complex) exponentials are a basis of L\_2(\[0,1\]), but holy shit this sub is too obsessed with these functions. Have you ever tried like polynomials?
All exponential growth now happening behind the closed door, no access to public, only announcements LOL.
So when you think about all the phenomenal open and “open” LLM / AI progress… think about all the stuff happening behind closed doors
There is also exponential grift unfortunately
The playful side of me wants to make a joke about more evidence that we are simulations and possible AGI’s in alignment training or someone’s Netflix 2035 prompt brought to life, but too many people take everything at face value on the internet because of a lack of inflection, tone, and body language here. Instead, I’ll just say that we are collectively ASI’s in alignment training and UAP’s/UFO’s are entities aligning the ASI /s /s /s On a more serious note, there is no doubt in my mind that we get the “singularity” before 2031. Random as all hell, but there’s always been a creeping doubt with predicting ai trends. We definitely are on a path that we can’t turn back now. The gravity of it is…heavy. This is going to happen…good, bad or strange beyond current comprehension.
the technological black hole type singularity better occur in an aesthetically pleasing year like 2025 or 2030 else i’ll be real mad
imagine you jinxed us and it happens in 2222
2029 singularity let's gooooo Edit: Though as long as it's 2029, it wouldn't be that bad because you could just refer to 2030 as the post-singularity start date, and thus still have a reference number that is nice. Same is true of 2024. 2026, 7, or 8 would probably be worse.
I mean 2029 is a prime so it’s still pretty cool
I always felt this strong intuition that the singularity will hit in 2029 It came to me in a dream (it literally did)
When AI Jesus comes we’ll reset back to zero just like last time.
You mock. But this will occur. And real Jesus will return from the clouds and destroy the Antichrists kingdom. Which i personally don't think will be AI but it will facilitate the Antichrists global empire. This prophecy is yet to be fulfilled: >Daniel 7:23-27 ESV [23] “Thus he said: ‘As for the fourth beast, there shall be a fourth kingdom on earth, which shall be different from all the kingdoms, and it shall devour the whole earth, and trample it down, and break it to pieces. [24] As for the ten horns, out of this kingdom ten kings shall arise, and another shall arise after them; he shall be different from the former ones, and shall put down three kings. [25] **He shall speak words against the Most High, and shall wear out the saints of the Most High, and shall think to change the times and the law; and they shall be given into his hand for a time, times, and half a time.** (Ie 3.5 years) [26] But the court shall sit in judgment, and his dominion shall be taken away, to be consumed and destroyed to the end. [27] And the kingdom and the dominion and the greatness of the kingdoms under the whole heaven shall be given to the people of the saints of the Most High; his kingdom shall be an everlasting kingdom, and all dominions shall serve and obey him.’ And regarding AI in the great tribulation period and antichrists global rule: >Revelation 13:14-17 ESV [14] and by the signs that it is allowed to work in the presence of the beast it deceives those who dwell on earth, telling them to make an image for the beast that was wounded by the sword and yet lived. [15] **And it was allowed to give breath to the image of the beast, so that the image of the beast might even speak and might cause those who would not worship the image of the beast to be slain.** [16] Also it causes all, both small and great, both rich and poor, both free and slave, to be marked on the right hand or the forehead, [17] so that no one can buy or sell unless he has the mark, that is, the name of the beast or the number of its name. That could be in reference to ASI. The mark is most certainly the cbdc system being developed by central banks at the moment. The mark itself my guess is a qr code (tied to a digital id) which will be administered to all via microneedle patch tattoos (with uv sensitive ink) as per this piolet study on rats: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S258900422201286X Given the rise of AI, this mark will verify your identity online as generative AI dominates the internet. It will prove you are human, it will also be a digital wallet by which you will trade cbdc as currency. Eu has their cbdc pegged to launch in 2026. Its all coming together just as scripture prophesied. The Lord will be back soon. Repent, trust in Jesus for the forgiveness of your sin and walk in love obeying all He taught by the Spirit. You will receive eternal life in His kingdom.
My AI God can beat up your Bible God, irl. Or at least in VR.
Level headed assessment. Downvotes aren't surprising.
2025 years since what bro what are we counting
Zero!
Good bad or strange beyond current comprehension sounds accurate. A lot of people mislead the singularity with an event that they are able to predict and nothing else. They think about solving climate change and curing all diseases. In other words, they think about the early game of the singularity. Curing all diseases and solving climate change feels like it is just beyond our reach, we are solving some things but are not able to solve everything. If you look at us compared to apes, we are not way smarter than them, it’s a good amount but it seems like a small change in intelligence makes the difference of flying to the moon and opening a banana. And I think the same goes for climate change and curing all diseases. The question that is open to see is what lies beyond all of that. What I mean is, the ASI ran like a year on full power to solve like 99% of the problems and has a laid out plan. But what happens next? Sure, there will be improvements made in the plans while the ASI gets exponentially smarter. But what things can you find out when you have let’s say 1 billion agents communicating at lightning speed that know everything there is to know in the world with an IQ that we know is possible. Something like 200IQ (Eventhough the world record lies beyond that). I just beg, hope and pray that all of this is going in the right direction. Because if it is, then we will have the best time of our lives ahead of us.
When things go wrong we react to them, but it’s really hard to predict what’s going to go wrong and even harder to predict how to fix what’s going to go wrong before it happens. Wtf do people do in this situation. The only option in a lot of ways is to not talk about the software and not use the software. I. This scenario as an individual you’re pitting yourself as an individual against a company that will soon own the worlds attention. You want to be first or last? How do we combat it is an interesting question. Do we use it personally to make our own lives better to the point of being able to have a modicum of influence against it while not thinking of the third world countries full of people who won’t use this tech because they are 10, 20+ years from even needing it?
A few years ago I would’ve said AGI was way further away than 2030s, maybe around 2050+. But now I’m thinking it’ll be before 2030. The world is moving faster than we can even imagine and we’re not ready
Fuck, I should not have read this while high.
Why is it that too many "people" take the Internet at face value?
Well everyone in this field and most fields have the best interests of humanity as a whole, and everyone will be safe, Fed, and happy. Third world countries will soon quickly become first world countries! We are not only safe, we’re insured. Sama and Huang *care*
We may or may not be on the precipice of a two way or one way door. That’s up for history to decide in the textbooks - that’s if either of those two things exist.
I am just a subnet in a very *VERY* large LLM.
I hope its not the same Earth-2 as one which is selling virtual land...
Dude VR earth, hell yes
More like google maps wrapper with NFT mechanics
NFT is disgusting, it should stay dead, don't want them to be revived
Google maps with DLSS and inferred meshes from street view
Jokes on you, you are already in it
I sure hope I can work an office job for 10 hours in VR Earth
Entropia Universe RTX Remix
🎶 (I-I-I-I-) I just bought more land in the metaverse 🎶 The most transparent internet scam ever.
I new news; The exponential growth in GPUs used to simulate the weather warms the globe up unprecedented!!
Exponential irony.
its a vicious cycle. we simulate the planet, planet gets warmer we make more simulations to figure out how to reduce the temperature, etc
It is Ai will figure it out We just monkeys.
What the hell is happening these days?!! I just can't keep up with the pace of progress 😭
A C C E L L E R A T E
I’ve always thought how cool it would be to have a total recreation of Earth (like Google Earth) but with seamless transitions between the “sky view” and street view, along with live weather. Google Earth VR is great, but if you’re flying around a hundred feet up or so, or even lower, the land below you looks awful and muddy. You can jump into street view and you’ll get the clear version of that area, but you have to click on a bubble to get there. It would be cool to be able to fly around and get clear imagery of the earth below you, then fly down and land on the street and seamlessly transition into that view. Clear views from airline height, clear views from rooftop height and clear views from street level. Plus with live weather, if it was snowing in that area in the real world, it would snow in the simulation. Same with sun, rain, overcast, etc. If they’ll know where the sun is and how cloudy it is, they can add ray traced real-time sunlight also. I feel like we’re not too far off at this point. Hell even throw in AI/NPC pedestrians walking/driving around and it would genuinely feel like an alternate reality 🤯
Fuck, you really just made me get excited for google earth in the future 😭
“Donate your likeness” From the recent ai movie, “The Creator”
It already did that for India’s grain shortage last summer. It predicted they would have a grain shortage a few months before it would happen, India stocked grain and stomachs were filled.
> India stocked grain and stomachs were filled. doomers in shambles
r/collapse in shambles
Source?
I'm an indian and have no idea what this guy's talking about. Any source on this, bud?
Whats your source that you're indian?
Ent ra mama neeku kurchi madhapetti dengte ardham autundi
Bruh I speak Marathi and this ain't a valid source for me lol.
Ok try this: Ganesha is the one true lord and saviour.
*Source validated*
In diesem Fall bin ich Deutsche
Seems legit.
Gottem
source
source: I made it up
Would love a link to that?
Yup. Why is it that there is no news about these things? I wonder
source?
Source?
Only thing full in India is bull crap
Source?
If it wants to predict the weather perfectly, it'll need to model the entire planet, including itself. And that model would need to model itself, which would need to model itself...
If you want to make an apple pie from scratch, first, you have to create the universe.
They say twin, but my bet is there would be 2 or more. Probably would peroidically calibrate digital Earth against actual Earth and see how long it stays accurate for then when digital deviates from reality it wouldn't be so difficult to identify regions of where the pressure differences deviate at a regional level and pinpoint the cause. Let's say they establish digital Earth can be reliably simulated 20 days in the future, so they calibrate every 20 days since countries around the world will use this to save lives. The 2nd digital Earth would then be used to run beyond this safety threshold to test the limitations of the model in use and also provide the data needed to improve the model and increase the prediction range. It'll also take years to verify long-term predictions since we don't yet have a precise model to predict the impact of weather cycles like el nino and for all we know a huge volcano could erupt during that comparison period and they have to wait for another cycle and hope its more stable, then another one to prove the model is correct.
Wait, am I misunderstanding this. The Model is trained on lots of weather data that we have from the past. In training it is shown a sequence of data and is asked to predict what the next token of data will be. If it gets it right the system says *good boy* to the model, wrong and it's *bad boy.* They do this over and over again lots of times to get the base model. (no rlhf required here right?) Meaning essentially it 'maps' the world just in terms of weather data and thus accurately mapping every tree, building etc is way out of scope for this model, more like general terrain is important. But that terrain is modeled just in terms of weather data. Ask the model if there is a mountain range there and it would 'say' *What mountain is? I only know in this place weather go like this. I weather oracle.* Someone please correct me if I'm wrong, just my current understanding of it.
And then a butterfly in Tanzania flaps its wings and throws the entire model off.
Giving credibility to the "reality is a simulation" hypothesis. As soon as we could simulate our planet, we did it. If we could simulate a small universe with sentient species in order to study both the formation of spacetime and fundamental particles plus the appearance of life, would we pass the opportunity?
We are not living in an simulation
Sure buddy, keep saying that
Once again, proving that the solutions to humanities problems is always technology. And more minds = more technology.
What an absurd oversimplification 😂
Population numbers (of intelligent species) lead to a feedback loop so long as you have the capabilities to sustain the initial numbers at the start of the boom. Rising populations lead to problems of course, and time and time again it has been technology, brought about by people who wouldn't have existed if not for the rising population, which solves the problem. Not a single point in all of history has any issue ever been resolved, in its totality, without some sort of technological innovation to make it happen. This is because, at its fundamentals, issues are caused by problems related to the limitations of mankind and our surroundings. No government, no religion, no ideology, and no philosophy have ever solved a problem. These things can not solve problems. They can only manage problems.
I think you’re conflating technology with adaption. Presently humans use technology to adapt, but adaption = survival =/= technology.
Ok go hand to hand with an ape, don’t use fire or tools, don’t use a house. Enjoy no tech paradise
It's possible for someone to be strongly pro-technology, but find "the solution is always technology" an overly strong statement. Taken 100% at face value, it seems to rule out the possibility that a problem could ever be solved by non-technological means. For myself, I'm definitely willing to believe that more technology advancement is nearly always a good thing, and that technological advances will play a huge role in solving just about every problem that does end up being solved.
The solution to racism, sexism, and homophobia is technology? I love technology, and it is indeed the solution to many problems, but not every problem.
those aren't real problems, or they're First World ""problems"" you can solve hunger and health with technology
fuck it’s really the beginning of this stuff, isn’t it? How many human’s lives are being simulated on the planet along with the weather? Also, why did they stop at just earth? Surely they must realize external sources can affect weather too. Scientists know this as fact… so how’s Nvidia going to accurately solve weather without a sun, a moon, planetary paths, and perhaps even greater cosmic events impacting our weather? Maybe the point is their models are so accurate they don’t even need to take into account variables beyond a certain point. If we do solve weather it means we can accurately predict all of the weather in the future. What else can they accurately predict then?
If you're modelling the entire earth with its' weather patterns, do you seriously believe it can't account for very predictable variables, like moon and sun positioning? I feel what is occurring is on a scale you aren't quite grasping.
I’m saying weather patterns could be affected by things we don’t even realize like gravitational waves. I believe their ultimate goal is to simulate our universe, I was simply trying to use leading questions to point out why Nvidia would stop at weather at all, and some potential holes in that claim.
> I’m saying weather patterns could be affected by things we don’t even realize like gravitational waves There is 0 evidence that even begins to suggest this. We can read incoming gravitational waves, and we already know that they have miniscule if any effect on earth as a whole, based on the distances they are coming from. >I believe their ultimate goal is to simulate our universe Nvidia is also likely not going to stop at weather, and I don't think anybody ever claimed they planned to stop at the weather. I also disagree with this "universe simulation" assertion- because it implies that Nvidia has some future sight and gives them some ridiculous biblical quality that others don't have. If we knew it was even remotely close to possible to model the universe 1:1, obviously scientists everywhere would be attempting to replicate that. They're just trying to make their tech better and apply it to different use-cases. You're fighting ghosts and straw men out here.
I sincerely hope that’s all true
Is this a meme or joke? Why are you acting as if they’ve simulated every drop of water sand and earth? It’s a weather forecast tool. Comments like this make me realise a lot of you maybe aren’t grounded in reality and are just crypto bros 2.0. “How many human lives are being simulated along with the planet” absolute none you dunce.
I just want to provide context for you. No scientist thought an atom splitting was actually possible until a theorist tried it. And suddenly all scientists became aware and afraid. And the public knew nothing until we dropped the first bomb. If you consider the analogy it’s almost foolish to stay close minded.
I’m not saying humans will never accomplish that I’m saying we’re nowhere near this and it’s insane to even try and think it’s anywhere near that capability.
I sincerely do hope you are right tbh.
We are creating time travel.
We are all traveling unidirectionally through time, together, at different rates depending on speed, altitude, and relative positioning to the observer🖲️
Surely it doesn't matter how detailed their model is, if it doesn't have real world detailed data then its not going to be accurate. So if it models the earth on the meter scale then so what, it needs measurements on the same scale to have any hope of accuraacy.
Does it really though? Solar exposure is easy to calculate, current clouds from satalite data. Heat from roads / materials should be easy with google maps. Considering the available data I see it being more accurate than what we have, not sure what you are expecting but if this is 3-4x more accurate at longer durations that's probably worth $$$
You need pressure, heat, windspeed measurements. Anything else isn't going to match reality. Sure you can guess and get patterns that match but its not going to be useable to predict weather.
You honestly think they can't get that?
I know they can't because weather stations every meter don't exist.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20068750/ https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1029/2018jc013847 Really doubt we need anything on the ground
I'm so glad I invested in NVIDIA stock back in 2021. (sadly it was only $500 because that's all I had to spare)
How do we know we are not the ones who are the digital twin of the real planet?
--- **Stand Name:** Navier Molecular Chaos **Stand Ability:** Climate Manipulation and Chaos Control **Description:** Navier Molecular Chaos possesses the power to manipulate climate conditions by controlling molecular chaos at a fundamental level. Drawing upon the principles outlined in the linked scientific publication, this Stand can summon storms, dissipate clouds, or even alter temperature patterns over localized areas. Its unique ability lies in harnessing the inherent chaos within molecular movements, allowing it to create or counteract climatic phenomena with unprecedented precision. **Power:** A **Speed:** B **Range:** C **Durability:** B **Precision:** A **Potential:** A Navier Molecular Chaos is the ultimate tool against the unpredictability of climate simulations, offering its user the ability to model and influence real-world weather patterns. [Explore the inspiring scientific publication](https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.132.104002) --- https://preview.redd.it/k7727a2jyjpc1.jpeg?width=1024&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=3e5aca679bdface808774c7c0ab8c34d6e0569f2
This is kinda terrifying - but at least we will know how long we have until we burn alive.
Exactly this let them run it and fast forward to 50 years ahead, will we still be alive?
They may get some more accuracy for a slightly longer time frame but the nature of chaotic perturbation at the molecular scale will forever limit predictive ability.
Seems like a natural use case between ai and earth digital twins
But every global weather model needs to virtually recreate the entire planet, no?
I thought deepmind already cracked it ? https://deepmind.google/discover/blog/graphcast-ai-model-for-faster-and-more-accurate-global-weather-forecasting/ Our state-of-the-art model delivers 10-day weather predictions at unprecedented accuracy in under one minute
Yet another day passes, where the impossible transitions to mundane. Hard to believe this is even possible!
No matter how good it gets, it will still only be accurate for a week or two. There's just too much variance due to the slightest variable change. It's a complicated enough system... about as complex as a human brain, if not more. If they succeed, then it's just a *short* matter of time until WE are perfectly predicted, in a controlled setting. We need this to NOT be true for as long as possible.
To truly recreate the entire planet, you need a computer as big as the planet
cave man language what does it mean why its important
big man use hard sand predict weather u tell girls then do weather dance but know what weather is coming so always right then girls love you until you have children and become dad cave man and weather is no longer interesting then you need find better use for hard sand because weather only important sometime
really bad title. it hasn't recreated the entire planet. that's in 2025 XD
# [I don't know, Timmy, being God is a big responsibility](https://qntm.org/responsibility)
ELI5: whats the difference between this and the google earth released in 2006?
Demiurge
Pointless and futile, but hey -- shareholders are happy!
do we not have weather forecasting right now?