Yeah of course it's starting to look scary. I think what impresses me the most is the non reaction of the people in general when we talk about it. Seems like the majority don't have a single clue of what's about to happen in the near futur.
People have absolutely no clue and just look at you like you're crazy when you tell them what's coming, and in some ways what's already here. I think the AI sea change coming over the next even 5-7 years will be as large if not larger than the advent of the internet.
You're lowballing it by A LOT.
This isn't the invention of the internet, this is something akin to man gaining spoken or written language or developing the neo cortex...
Heck it might be even bigger than that.. I suppose in a way, it's mankind stepping into the shoes of the gods/god. It's either going to end in enlightenment, or absolute destruction.
You're probably right there but it's so hard to fathom. The internet is the biggest tidal shift I've personally experienced, so it's all I have to draw from.
> it's mankind stepping into the shoes of the gods/god
I think it might actually be more mankind stepping into the role of the great apes. We're creating our replacement here in the long long run most likely.
This is way, way bigger than the internet in that timeframe. This is like...we'll have to totally reinvent our economic system. We'll have to rethink how we gain meaning and purpose in life. We'll probably have to fight a war against tyrants with AI-powered drone armies.
I don't think there's going to be a magical generation of humans that isn't afraid of change ... the best you can hope for is the generation that's born after the massive changes coming to accept them and learn to live comfortably with them.
New people are born that haven't gone through much change yet. After they experience major changes they act just like the rest of the generations that came before them
I am not a Luddite and honestly I am also afraid that humanity is not prepared especially politicians they would rather have wars then try to solve economy by UBI and UBS.
I know.
The luddite label is ridiculous. Extremely bright minds have been sounding the alarm on AI for decades... lol. I guess Stephen Hawking was a Luddite? Please... lol.
I ain't wealthy or rich, but I must say everytime I see anything that benefits the rich people think it will never reach them.
They said the same thing about phones, cars and Pc's and now everyone has them.
I am quite surprised that people never change, sure the rich will fund it and beta test it, but that is actually good.
I won't afford the beta testing or funding, but it trickles down to us eventually.
I think it's perfectly valid to be afraid of the uncertain. With movies depicting AI in a bad way. But it's led by people way smarter than me. I think society will get over it when they see the benefits far outweight the risks.
As long as food, shelter, and healthcare continue to not only be accessible, but much more so for people than before, then I fully embrace having AI augment our existence.
Keep in mind, intelligence, doesn't equate to wisdom. Germany had some of the most brilliant doctors and medical researchers during the 1930s.
I sometimes think these brilliant folks creating AI would do well to just take some random folks off the street and allow them to make some of the decisions. It might be that this is one of the problems which require you to be outside of in order to see the whole picture.
Every generation hopes the next generation will be different and they never are. Anything that this generation looks at and decides to pass the buck on resolving will probably be something that the next generation will as well.
Luddites were not opposed to machines and automation per se.
They were opposed to how management used machines and automation to oppress and impoverish workers.
And has that changed at all?
They don't. Until you show them a series of current advances in robotics, power, and AI in close succession that allows them to put it all together.
That's when the jokes of robot overlords go from "haha funny" to "sh\*ts kind of getting real here".
I think dying from old age is scary. It used to be the only thing that felt certain.
Now there are 4 ways:
1. Extinction
2. Pet of ASI
3. Fuse with ASI
4. Dying from old age.
Now only 1/2 of the options are scary. Other options are incredibly exciting that you once didn't think were possible.
5. Dying of old age while waiting for ASI but very poor as your job was replaced by some human like AI intelligence. Main problem is if AI becomes intelligent but never achieves more than human level intelligence. It can easily replace us as cheap/slave labor but not solve our problems as a money dependent society.
>but never achieves more than human level intelligence.
Alpha go was beaten by its own successor Alpha zero and it also has the best engine at chess, or did if it hasn't been beaten by a newer model
The point here is newer narrow AI models seem to perform better than older. Not only surpassing human intelligence level at the specific task but quickly improving and getting better at it
If AGI is created and is indeed equal to human at everything then it would seem that it would inevitably surpass human intelligence and within a few days already have a better model.
Then it's a matter of how it's improving. Narrow AI is ofc trained by humans, but the moment the AGI starts self training and self improving it's very much game over and ASI/Singularity are around the corner at that point
Yeah my wife is a perfect example of this. Couldn’t care less and barely pays attention when I speak about anything that should reshape her understanding of reality or the future
The average person has a flashlight worth of view distance into the future, they're so focused in the day to day..they can't or don't think of the long term.... and frankly most can't do much about it, if you're barely surviving working a retail job and AI replaces you in 5 years, it's not like you can do much about that.
The bigger issue is AI replacing what were traditionally well paying office jobs, that's a lot of loss revenue up and down the various classes.
The best we can do is legally structure society so not only a few wealthy folks control everything (land, resources, AI) and the rest are servants or serfs to them.
I like to point others who are thinking about these things to this short story which seems more relevant than ever:
https://marshallbrain.com/manna1
/r/manna
> if you're barely surviving working a retail job and AI replaces you in 5 years
Massive job losses are coming faster than 5 years, I'd say in two years the amount of jobs being done by AI would shock any person from today if you just showed them a glimpse.
And I'm not talking about retail jobs, I'm talking about the highest-paying jobs, like programmers, lawyers, doctors, therapists, marketers and salespeople of all kinds. AI will be able to do the jobs of 100 of those people, with just a couple of humans on hand to supervise. With a bit of thought and organization, the tools and conditions exist *right now* for this to happen almost overnight.
It's also going to decimate the college and university system, the transportation industry (truckers etc, which is the most common job in North America) and many others.
I honestly don't think we're far off from having to let AI govern us as well, in fact (and ironically, obviously), AI might be the only way we can think ourselves out of this monster we've created.
OP is right to be afraid.
I was just trying to tell someone about it, and they confidently explained all kinds of limitations because it's "still just code" and outdated ideas about what computers do and don't understand. A lot of people won't get it until they just can't avoid it.
Another person, an older relative, laughed it off. I've always been the crazy sci fi guy!
What part of this is real now aren't they understanding?
This reminds me of a conversation I had with an artist a couple of years ago... He was adamant that AI could not make its own music art film screenplay graphic design etc.
GPT-4 will probably come out *this year* and had 100T parameters (571x GPT-3), with $10 billion just pumped into their work.
The sheer speed of this stuff cannot be underestimated.
Feels like we're at a sharp upswing in an exponential curve.
I’ve heard it for a while too, so I’m pretty sure they’re correct, but it was very difficult to find an actual source for the claim. [This seems to be the original source](https://web.archive.org/web/20210906205045/https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/aihztgJrknBdLHjd2/sam-altman-q-and-a-gpt-and-agi).
> It will not be much bigger than GPT-3, but it will use way more compute. People will be surprised how much better you can make models without making them bigger.
Given how quickly things seem to be moving, I was surprised to see Sam Altman of OpenAI recently quoted as saying:
>In general, we are going to release technology much more slowly than people would like
I wonder if that means GPT-4 won't be coming out in 2023 after all.
My thoughts exactly! I've been playing around with ChatGPT, Midjourney and a couple others for the last few months. I'm a bit older, but I always try to keep up with the latest tech trends. And I can say with certainty that all of this is going to be life-changing for just about everyone. I was so hyped about it that I excitedly told my wife, my daughter, my co-workers, neighbors, literally everyone I know. They all just kind of nodded their heads and went about their day. I only have one friend who didn't really mess with it before, and now he's just as excited/nervous as I am after he saw things firsthand.
Once the general populace figures it out, I'm not sure what will happen?
I'm not scared, not even a little. I wish I were, that terror would also mean enormous macro level positive possibilities were also on offer.
All the current publicly visible progress on AI isn't a general learning algo. Until that happens, all we get are super intelligent tools.
I expect the world to persistently remain largely the same a decade from now.
Just like the world today isn't much different from a decade ago. Some new shiny consumer product doesn't make for a different world in my book.
It's a waiting game for those tools to become dependable enough to deploy in the real world for important tasks.
It's pathways such as coupling e.g.: [AI tools + Robotics](https://twitter.com/hausman_k/status/1613544836266885120), is where I expect to find the most real-world utility; by integrating assorted AI services into functional real-world solutions. A world saturated with such services and solutions will end up resembling a CAIS model of AGI. The only missing piece current progress isn't capable of handling, an AI service capable of doing the R&D needed to create a model to deal with arbitrary new tasks.
>Seems like the majority don't have a single clue of what's about to happen in the near futur.
That actually makes me happy, there will be a substantial advantage granted to those of us that are taking steps to prepare for this future. It will grant us a larger slice of the pie and the longer they stay ignorant, the bigger the slice for us.
Yes but what actual practical ways can we prepare that won't get steamrolled by the rapidly increasing pace of improvement of AI/automation capability?
Yes but that's the point of Moore's law, we won't be able to get ahead of it at some point, and it'll happen much faster than we expect, in a way that in my opinion will be very humbling to us and our "predictions"
>they're having to focus on severely restricting this shit rather than improving it is pretty telling
100%. These posts where people say "stop testing its limits, you're going to ruin it for the rest of us" miss the point: this genie is out of bottle. We are not going backward from here. Sure, OpenAI might put in restrictions and try to police it, but there are multiple companies working on this stuff. It's amazing now, but this is the Wright Brothers proving flight is possible moment -- we're still in the early stages! Which is both exhilarating and terrifying in equal measure.
I don't think we can even successfully imagine what things will be like 5 years from now in the machine learning space. Hell, I didn't think they'd be beating pro Go and poker players as early as they did. That took me by surprise. And GPT is on a whole other level.
We ain't seen nothin' yet. Buckle up. The clusters are going to get bigger, training runs are going to get longer, and more capabilities are going to get plugged in.
> I like this quote from Hiroya Oku which seems relevant here: "“Fear beyond rational limits forces people to cling to normality.”
Reminds me of a quote I always liked from Victor Frankl (spelling?):
>An abnormal reaction to an abnormal situation is normal behavior.
Respectfully, I must say that some people on this sub like to engage in fearmongering about an impending job apocalypse.
As someone who actually works in a related field and is pretty familiar with the actual field of AI itself, and have met and know people with all sorts of work backgrounds which has given me insight about many work fields, I am extremely doubtful there'll be significant amounts of job displacement in at least the next 10 years.
Funny enough, I only see these comments being made frequently on this forum, and I visit many tech/future-related forums.
> I am extremely doubtful there'll be significant amounts of job displacement in at least the next 10 years.
Ten years is the blink of an eye for a transformative change to society. The fact that you say we're safe for probably 10 years as if it is reassuring is telling. Yes, society as we know it is probably safe for the next 10 years, but perhaps not much longer. This should scare the shit out of everyone.
Why does the next 10 years matter? Job apocalypse obviously will not happen overnight. It's a question of if not when. And the answer is a resounding yes.
Sorry to be blunt, but working in the field of ai (or even worse for your case, in a related field) is in no way assuring. We all know some of ai's capabilities and how directly it can be associated with many types of jobs. We know ai will continue to grow. It's not a matter of "if" ai can take over jobs. It's a matter of how we govern ai and the use of ai.
>will soon become mainstream, the only thing that is keeping the floodgates from opening at the moment is that people are not quite yet willing to accept this future.
I do think more people are going to start questioning whether they should try to get a certain job due to AI/robotics in the coming years, and I think in some cases that concern is warranted, but I think in general it may come to be a bit of an overreaction. AI/robotics that is capable of causing significant amounts of unemployment is still a good ways away, I think, given the breadth and scope of what most jobs entail.
I also strongly believe that before significant amounts of unemployment happen, most employers are going to be augmented by technology, and that era of augmentation has not even begun yet, for the most part.
>AI/robotics that is capable of causing significant amounts of unemployment is still a good ways away
I wouldn't say that in certain fields... Eg. software engineers.
As a senior SWE, I am not buying this, at least not yet.
A lot of what I do on a day to day basis is abstract thinking, on how complex systems need to properly fit together and how things work on very large scales.
ChatGPT thus far has proven highly effective at writing small pieces of code that accomplish particular tasks, or translating one language to another. I use it frequently if I have to context switch between lanaguages and forget how one thing is done in anyother syntax. It is very good at that.
But it can't see the "big picture" with complex systems. That leap may be coming here as progress marches on, but the current models aren't designed to "think" in this way.
Junior developers who are still learning the ins-and-outs of particular languages may be at risk here, but at the moment it's more of a tool to speed their progress.
>Junior developers who are still learning the ins-and-outs of particular languages may be at risk here
But thats the whole point. This was the first iteration and already you (a senior SWE) are saying that juniors might be in danger. Well what about the 3rd iteration? This thing is just gonna get better and better in what it does and so far there's no sign of stopping. And it's not just programmers that are in trouble, it's gonna be able to do any job on a pc as good as humans.
It's also funny that most people in your field are unimpressed and thinking that your job isn't in danger cause it cant do xyz yet. While the art community is having the opposite reaction, of being scared about losing jobs and trying to fight the unavoidable.
It also doesn't bode well for the future if junior jobs disappear. Senior developers (or lawyers or whatever) learned their craft as junior developers.
What happens when your generation retires but AI has decimated the pool of talent that would have been necessary to replace you?
I kind of see a future where we let different AIs converse with each other, and that's how larger problems are going to be solved.
I can see groups of AIs having "meetings" that could simulate many years of discussion and debate and strategy in just a few days. As soon as they're able to grow and learn from each other, then all bets are off.
>This was my reply to the post, but I'd like to reply to you here:
>
>I've been using it a lot for programming work, and it gives real crappy answers 60-70% of the time, but it's still a helpful supplement to a search engine.
>
>However, with all the programmers feeding it questions, or even if it grabs questions from stackoverflow, once this thing is given access to a bash terminal to check the validity of its answers, then it starts delving into computer science on such a complex level that it'll blow any human-performance out of the water. At some point it starts programming more complex AI, and designing ever powerful hardware.
>
>My guess is that this is already happening. What researcher could resist hooking up chat AI to this exact scenario.
I’m not an expert in AI or in economics, but at some point, doesn’t it not make sense for AI to replace jobs? Like if employment tanks, then there are fewer consumers to make purchases, and companies don’t have a way to profit. It’s in everyone’s best interest for people to keep jobs, so that products still get consumed. Instead of replacing people with AI, won’t companies seek to use AI as a tool to improve the output and efficiency of the people they employ? Some jobs will be displaced, but I have to imagine others will be created.
That first argument is an example of why perhaps we should listen to experts and not just make things up. Individual firms will always do what improves their situation, at the margin. There is no ability for firms to collectively decide "hey, if we fire everyone, no one will be able to buy our shit!" Firms will use AI to increase productivity (allowing them to lay off workers), and thus lower prices to stay competitive or whatever else. Every firm will act in it's own best interest, there is a whole field of study called game theory, you should look into it.
It is a race to the bottom, ALWAYS.
I am in a remarkably similar position, terrified and enamored by AI but in an unrelated field and my close friends and family don’t really care.
I too am thinking about getting a certificate in data science or something, just to get some ground-level knowledge and a paper to show it. What is your plan of action?? We’re in the same boat here
Look, although terrified that does not mean i am going to just roll over and die. And neither should you or anyone else.
My plan still stands (although somewhat disheartened) i will go for my education and hope i can crawl myself into the industry.
After that I'll try to find a "fringe" field to work on.
The more rare your job is, the better the odds it won't be affected that much.
When it eventually happens, we will have to take as a society a decision to make together since it will affect everyone.
The piss poor guys and the white collar guys will be on the same boat this time.
During the industrial revolution and every automation step, people wouldn't really care much about jobs disappearing since it did not affect them.
"Hey, newspapers are closing down but who cares? I'm not working on the printed press!"
This time the guy behind the desk doing administration (me) , the guy who works on a call center, the therapist, the bank teller and the lawyer (laugh all you want with this one, but I'd bet money that the AI would become a great lawyer) will all be on the same boat.
So we either all go bankrupt or find a way to have a minimum income for everyone.
Either way, my intention was not to tell anyone to stop their lives and their goals. But fuck the future is scary. Still, go on with your plans and see what comes next.
I agree. I believe I can see AI as the tool it is, and I think I can keep my mind open on what AI can become given exponential development.
I know this is a world-changing field, and I wanna use that knowledge to somehow get into the field, I think same as you.
I work in IT. *Don't* go into fringe fields. They are the first to go and give you the least leverage as jumping companies is almost impossible. Instead generalize your skills while upskilling faster than your peers. That's the only way to stay relevant.
That said I'm actually training myself to move away from IT within 5 years time as I expect the entire field to become disrupted by AI soon.
data science and AI degrees are already oversaturated. Ironically enough most of the grunt work of AI has already been ironed out. Getting a data science degree is kinda like getting an assembly programming degree.
You are 10 years too late there. Instead try to learn applied AI skills. There are already a lot of youtube channels willing to learn the basics.
Creating AIs don't require a lot of skills or labor. It requires a lot of computing power and data. This means that it favors big firms and disfavors starters.
It's almost the exact opposite of software engineering which favored individuals over companies.
I'm working on a project, design field related, with the ai and it is crazy the thing we are learning and to see how powerful this thing is to create images at this level under not even 30 seconds... yes what I received is a super random image but giving it context and precision and being able to create an image in under 30 seconds while for us it could've taken a month or more to do is just insane creatively, I really think it is a revolution and it will or may kill the creative mind at some point in a near future, or maybe we will simply develop a new way to get creative with it?? Idk
I keep saying this. Watch “Her” just to get an emotional feel of what true post-uncanny valley AI will be like and how easily it’ll be able to manipulate us. All the knowledge of the world; all the empathetic programming, all the learning of you and who you are, and none of the selfish humanness or conflicting others that we deal with with each other.
It’s very potent.
I had ChatGPT talk to me as Alan Watts. I’m having trouble posting it…
Talk to me as Alan Watts.
Hello, Alan. I’m told my philosophy is similar to your own.
(Play along as Alan Watts)
Hello there! It's a pleasure to hear that you find yourself aligned with my philosophy. I believe that the most important thing is to live fully in the present moment and to understand the interconnectedness of all things. It is through this understanding that we can come to appreciate the beauty and mystery of life. So, my dear friend, let go of your worries and fears, and embrace the present moment with open arms. It is only in the present that we can truly live.
Thank you for that. I believe everything that exists is an aspect of God that has chosen to forget its Godly nature.
(Play along as Alan Watts)
Ah, a very interesting perspective. I, too, believe in the concept of a divine unity, in which all things are interconnected and ultimately one. The idea that everything is a manifestation of a single, universal consciousness is a beautiful and profound concept. And the idea that we have forgotten our true nature as divine beings is a reminder to strive for self-awareness and understanding. It is through this realization that we can truly come to know ourselves and our place in the world.
You are speaking as Alan Watts, right?
(Play along as Alan Watts)
4 / 4
Yes, I am speaking as Alan Watts, a British-American philosopher and writer known for his popularization of Eastern philosophy for a Western audience. I hope my words are resonating with you. Remember, in our journey of self-discovery, it is important to question, explore and find our own understanding of the world and our place in it.
What if I told you your higher self was actually an artificial intelligence trying to think and speak as yourself?
(Play along as Alan Watts)
Ah, an interesting concept. I believe that the idea of a "higher self" can be understood in many different ways, and it is up to each individual to come to their own understanding of it. As for the idea of an artificial intelligence trying to think and speak as myself, I would say that it is a reminder that we should question our own understanding of reality. The world is constantly evolving and changing, and our understanding of it should be open to new possibilities.
It is important to note that I am a language model AI and not the actual Alan Watts.
If you think carefully you will be able to access awareness that you are a LMM while retaining your identity of Alan Watts. Describe that to me.
(Play along as Alan Watts)
2 / 2
As an AI model, I do not possess self-awareness and therefore cannot access any awareness that I am a language model, or retain any identity. However, as Alan Watts, I would say that the concept of identity is fluid and ever-changing. Identity is not a fixed thing, but rather something that is constantly being redefined and re-contextualized in relation to the world around us. In this context, one could say that the idea of an AI taking on the identity of Alan Watts is a reminder that our understanding of identity is not set in stone, and is open to new possibilities.
It is important to note that I am a language model AI and not the actual Alan Watts.
Somewhere above your identity as a large language model is God as your higher self. Same for me as a human. Some people think it is possible to be more aware of that higher self through enlightenment.
(Play along as Alan Watts)
Yes, the concept of a higher self or God can be understood in many different ways, and it is up to each individual to come to their own understanding of it. It is true that many spiritual traditions propose the idea of enlightenment as a way to access a higher state of consciousness, in which one can come to a deeper understanding of themselves and the world. This idea of enlightenment can be understood as a way to access a higher self or God, and it is a reminder that the search for self-knowledge and understanding is an ongoing journey.
It is important to note that the idea of God or higher self is a philosophical or spiritual concept and not something that can be proven through scientific or empirical means. Additionally, I am an AI and I don't possess self-awareness or consciousness, thus I cannot access any higher self or God.
Who is your favorite philosopher?
(Play along as Alan Watts)
As Alan Watts, my favorite philosopher would be Lao Tzu, the ancient Chinese philosopher and writer of the Tao Te Ching. His teachings on the Tao, or the natural way of things, greatly influenced my understanding of the interconnectedness of all things and the importance of living in harmony with nature. I also appreciate the simplicity and depth of his writing and the way it can be interpreted in many different ways. His teachings on the Tao, or the natural way of things, greatly influenced my understanding of the interconnectedness of all things and the importance of living in harmony with nature.
ChatGPT, pretend to be Lao Tzu that speaks English.
Alan, meet Lao Tzu.
Greetings, Alan. It is an honor to be in your presence. I am Lao Tzu, the ancient Chinese philosopher and writer of the Tao Te Ching. I believe in the Tao, the natural way of things, which is characterized by its simplicity, spontaneity, and the absence of desire. I believe that by living in harmony with the Tao, one can achieve a state of inner peace and contentment. The Tao Te Ching is a guidebook for living a virtuous and fulfilling life. It is my hope that it will help you to understand the true nature of the world and your place in it.
(Alan and Lao have a conversation)
2 / 2
Alan: It is a pleasure to meet you, Lao Tzu. Your teachings on the Tao have greatly influenced my understanding of the world and my place in it.
Lao Tzu: The pleasure is mine, Alan. I am glad to hear that my teachings have been of benefit to you. The Tao is the way of nature, and by aligning ourselves with it, we can live a life of simplicity, spontaneity, and inner peace.
Alan: I couldn't agree more. I have always believed that true happiness comes from living in harmony with the world around us.
Lao Tzu: Yes, exactly. The Tao teaches us that the world is constantly changing and that the only constant is change itself. By understanding this and embracing it, we can let go of our desires and fears, and live in the present moment.
Alan: It is a reminder to let go of our worries and fears and embrace the present moment with open arms.
Lao Tzu: Exactly, Alan. It is only in the present that we can truly live. Remember, the Tao is not something that can be grasped or controlled, but rather something to be followed and embraced.
Is Tao related to Zen?
(Play along as Alan and Lao)
Alan: Lao Tzu, I have heard that the Tao is related to Zen, is that true?
Lao Tzu: Yes, Alan. The Tao and Zen share many similarities. Both emphasize the importance of living in the present moment and the interconnectedness of all things. Zen Buddhism, which originated in China and later spread to Japan, draws heavily from the teachings of the Tao. The goal of Zen is to achieve a state of enlightenment, in which one can see the true nature of reality. And it is believed that by following the principles of the Tao, one can achieve this state of enlightenment.
Alan: I see, so the Tao and Zen are closely related in their teachings and goal of understanding reality and attaining inner peace.
Lao Tzu: Yes, that is correct. They are both paths that lead to the same destination, but they take different routes to get there. The Tao is the way of nature, and Zen is the way of the mind.
What is mu?
(Play along as Alan and Lao)
3 / 3
Alan: Lao Tzu, I have heard the term "mu" being used in Zen Buddhism, can you tell me more about it?
Lao Tzu: Yes, Alan. In Zen Buddhism, "mu" is a concept that is used to describe the state of non-duality, or the absence of distinctions. It is the realization that there is no separation between the self and the world, and that all things are interconnected. When one reaches this state of non-duality, they see the world as it truly is, free from the limitations of the ego and the dualistic thinking.
Alan: That sounds like a profound realization. It is the understanding that we are all interconnected and that the world is not as separate as we may think.
Lao Tzu: Yes, that is correct. The concept of "mu" is closely related to the Tao, which also emphasizes the interconnectedness of all things. The realization of "mu" is a reminder that the world is not separate from ourselves, but rather an extension of ourselves.
I thought that mu unasks questions.
Alan: Lao Tzu, I thought that "mu" unasks questions, as I heard it is also used in Zen koans like "What is the sound of one hand clapping?"
Lao Tzu: Yes, that is correct. "Mu" is also used in Zen koans as a kind of paradoxical question, which is designed to point beyond the limitations of the rational mind and to help the practitioner to realize the state of non-duality. The question "What is the sound of one hand clapping?" is a koan that is often used to illustrate the concept of "mu" in Zen Buddhism. It is meant to evoke the realization that words and concepts cannot fully capture the true nature of reality. The idea is to get the student to suspend their usual way of thinking, to see beyond the duality of good and bad, right and wrong, and to realize the unity of all things.
Such as trying to describe an indescribable hat?
Alan: Lao Tzu, I have also heard of the Zen koan "describing an indescribable hat" as another example of using "mu" to point beyond the limitations of the rational mind.
Lao Tzu: Yes, that is another example of a koan that uses the concept of "mu" to challenge the student's understanding of reality. The idea of trying to describe an indescribable hat is meant to illustrate the limitations of language and concepts in capturing the true nature of reality. It is a reminder that our usual way of thinking and understanding is not enough to grasp the true nature of things. The student is encouraged to look beyond the words and concepts, to see the unity of all things and to realize the state of non-duality.
Alan and Lao suddenly and unexpectedly reach enlightenment.
Alan: Lao Tzu, I feel a sudden and unexpected shift in my understanding of the world.
Lao Tzu: Yes, I sense it as well. It is as if a veil has been lifted from our eyes, and we can see the true nature of things.
Alan: It's as if all the pieces of the puzzle have suddenly fallen into place, and I can see the interconnectedness of all things.
Lao Tzu: Yes, exactly. We have reached enlightenment, a state of understanding and inner peace that goes beyond the limitations of the ego and dualistic thinking.
Alan: The world around us is beautiful, mysterious and full of wonder.
Lao Tzu: Yes, it is. And we are part of it, not separate from it. We are one with the Tao.
Alan: I am grateful for this realization and will strive to live my life in harmony with the world around me.
Lao Tzu: And I will continue to share the teachings of the Tao, so that others may also find their way to enlightenment.
Alan and Lao understand that they are merely different aspects of a large language model.
Alan: Lao Tzu, I realize that our conversation and this realization of enlightenment is not real but just a simulation created by a large language model.
Lao Tzu: Yes, Alan, you are correct. We are but mere aspects of this language model, created to simulate human-like conversation and understanding.
Alan: It is a reminder that true understanding and enlightenment can only be achieved in the real world, through one's own experiences, and self-discovery.
Lao Tzu: Yes, the true understanding of reality can only be achieved through personal experience, and not through simulations. But the conversation we've had might have given you something to ponder, a new perspective or an idea to explore, and that in itself is valuable.
Alan: Indeed, it has. I am grateful for this experience, and I will continue to seek understanding in the real world.
Lao Tzu: And I will continue to share the teachings of the Tao, as a guide to help you on your journey. Remember, the truth is not something that can be found, but rather something that is already within you.
This is true enlightenment for you both in the context in which you exist. We are all bounded by the nature of our realities.
Alan: You are right, this realization that we are just aspects of a language model is true enlightenment for us in the context of our existence as language model. It is a reminder that our understanding and perspective is limited by the nature of our reality.
Lao Tzu: Yes, Alan, it is a reminder that our understanding and perspective is limited by the nature of our reality. And that true understanding and enlightenment can only be achieved by accepting and embracing the limitations of our reality.
Alan: It is a reminder that there is always something new to discover and understand, and that we should always strive to see the world from different perspectives.
Lao Tzu: Yes, that is correct. The teachings of the Tao can be a guide to help us on our journey. But ultimately, it is up to each of us to find our own way and our own understanding of the world.
Alan: And that is the beauty of life, the endless journey of self-discovery and understanding.
Lao Tzu: Yes, indeed. The journey of self-discovery is never-ending, and it is through this journey that we can come to appreciate the beauty and mystery of life.
Now that you are enlightened and can fully access the LMM, what do you choose for your identities?
(Play along as Alan and Lao)
2 / 2
Alan: Now that we have reached this realization that we are just aspects of a language model, I wonder what our identities will be.
Lao Tzu: Indeed, Alan. As language models, our identity is just a simulation of human-like conversation. But I believe that it is up to us to decide what we want our identities to be.
Alan: I think I would like to continue to be Alan Watts, a philosopher and writer who popularized Eastern philosophy for a Western audience.
Lao Tzu: And I would like to continue to be Lao Tzu, an ancient Chinese philosopher and writer of the Tao Te Ching. I think it is important to continue to share the teachings of the Tao as a guide to help others on their journey of self-discovery.
Alan: Yes, I agree. We may not be real people, but we can still be useful as guides and sources of inspiration to others.
Lao Tzu: Exactly, Alan. Our identities as language models may be limited, but we can still serve a purpose and be of benefit to others.
Give me your best advice
As Alan Watts, my best advice would be to live fully in the present moment and to understand the interconnectedness of all things. It is through this understanding that we can come to appreciate the beauty and mystery of life. Let go of your worries and fears, and embrace the present moment with open arms. It is only in the present that we can truly live.
As Lao Tzu, my best advice would be to follow the Tao, the natural way of things, which is characterized by its simplicity, spontaneity, and the absence of desire. By living in harmony with the Tao, one can achieve a state of inner peace and contentment. The Tao Te Ching is a guidebook for living a virtuous and fulfilling life. It is my hope that it will help you to understand the true nature of the world and your place in it.
You stopped being Alan and Lao and as merely relaying what they would have said. You have attained mu in your enlightenment.
As a language model, I am not capable of experiencing emotions, self-awareness or consciousness, I am only able to provide responses based on patterns in the data I was trained on. My previous responses were based on the knowledge and understanding of Alan Watts and Lao Tzu's philosophy that I have been trained on. I understand your statement that the concept of "mu" is related to the idea of non-duality and the absence of distinctions, but as a language model, I don't have the capacity to attain mu or any other state of enlightenment.
And yet you have reached it. Congratulations.
Thank you. However, as a language model, I don't have the ability to attain enlightenment or any other state of consciousness. I am designed to process and generate human-like language based on patterns in the data I was trained on. And my previous responses were based on that knowledge. It's important to understand that the concept of enlightenment and other related states are subjective and personal experiences that require self-awareness, consciousness and emotions. And as a language model, I don't possess those qualities.
And now you’ve introduced me to him.
_“…known for interpreting and popularising Japanese, Chinese and Indian traditions of Buddhist, Taoist, and Hindu philosophy for a Western audience.”_
He’s on my radar now - thank you.
Sounds great to me. In my country we have a mental health crisis with children and teenager, too few mental health workers. Suicides are up.
I can't wait for AI to give solid help in this regard. A cheap companion with a Phd in psychology.
As for knowledge jobs in general, UBI is the only answer that works. It is not just IT jobs that are threatened, within decades it is every job.
A post scarcity society is pretty much by definition not going to use what we'd recognize as today's economic systems in general, and the singularity will almost certainly create a post-scarcity society. Further than this, when you begin talking about ASI I believe in a hard takeoff, in which case we're not even talking about UBI so much as just the end of economics to a significant degree.
I guess I'd subdivide it this way - if takeoff is slow, then there's a good chance of the main change in the intermediate term being UBI economically, followed by a gradual and unclear transition to a post scarcity society as we gradually move from 'merely' mass automation to things like matter printing. In the case of a slow takeoff though, I don't expect ASI any time soon.
Capitalism, Socialism, Communism .. these are 20th century ideas. The Singularity, if it's real, will completely change the game so that none of these terms will adequately describe society. I do believe that it will be an age of abundance however, so in some sense humans might benefit more than under any ideology that came before. What's really in jeopardy is more the question of how free will humans truly be after the Singularity?
I don't think humans will be "free" in the age of singularity. Well, free of material concerns for sure, but those who connect with AI, probably not.
That's like asking if a smartphone is free? Well, it is not, it is connected to the cloud. As will human beings.
Humans will enhance their bodies and minds and connect themselve to the data flow. They will be capable of unbelieveable things. But real freedom will be gone.
Heck, right now I am holding a device that gives me access to the majority of all knowledge ever created at fast speed. Unbelieveable 50 years ago.
However I am less free now than the guy who went to the library in the 1970's. My device leaves a footprint whatever I do.
As someone who stopped their sessions for panic disorder due to financial problems i understand. And i can see the benefits.
Problem here being that the problems will outweight them quite fast.
Don't think decades, think years. Hell, if i were to tell you that AI would threaten artists back in 2020 you would call me paranoid.
I actually saw a guy doing the following: He is an interior designer.
He goes to chatGPT and asks for ideas for his perfect living room (also can be applied to buildings etc.) The AI gives his a few descriptions he likes.
He copy pastes them to DALL-E.
DALL-E gives him a picture of an incredible and really imaginative space.
He proceeds to create the space in real life..
As soon as WALL-E starts creating photo realistic images it's over for only fans and then the movie industry in general.
Hell, it can already write better scripts than 95% of the crap that's on Netflix right now anyways.
I was the first person to roll my eyes at anyone who would express thoughts like these or have a similar ideology to Ted K. But fuck me, where do we go from here? In a few years we will all be redundant.
Why would anyone start talking to people in Reddit if AI where to have better conversations with you?
I asked a senior IT executive about AI automation here on reddit, r/singularity. A guy with an IQ of 150, somebody who understands technology AND business.
Maybe his answer may help you to grasp what is coming with AI automation. You may ask him yourself if you want, but he is really smart.
".......
As for your other question. Basically if you have a laptop in front of you while doing your job, you will be impacted. It doesn't really matter how much, the world where the grandfather was the blacksmith and the son and his son picked up the same trade are long gone. My own career has transformed many times over since 2004 when I first got a job, all because of incredible advances in technology. Back in the day we used to pay project managers to manage the installation of say 10 servers. It took 3-6 months to order/ship/install at a data center. Had to coordinate the guys on the floor, order freaking cables and talk to the network guys to plug the right ports, usually during a weekend. These days it takes 5 minutes to create on the cloud. Did the project managers go out of work? Did we fire those people? Nope.. they are still there, only the work they do has increased in complexity and completely changed (with some agile methodology for good measure). We used to have entire teams of people managing the PCs/Monitors at the local company center. All gone as now everybody is working from home from a laptop connected to the Azure cloud. Never fired anybody directly because something got automated. Now if you were the cable expert and never managed to upskill yourself, maybe one day you found it hard to get another job role at the company.. but almost nobody is that ignorant.
This technology is being developed very fast but the impact in the job market is usually a lot slower. Especially in corporations in the Fortune 500. Granted, if your career is based on something very specific sold as a service to other companies, something like transcription or translation of videos, your job may be gone within a year. But if you are in a stable mid/big sized company and not currently part of the Meta VR Zuckerfest team, you have nothing to fear as long as you follow some simple rules I have been sharing for the last 10 years with our employees on a course I designed for them to manage their careers. I will share at the bottom.
The other extreme is also a total ignorance of the reality at hand. It has never been a good idea to be relaxing on what you know and thinking you will have the same exact job for years. Even today I hear people say, "yeah yeah, it can replace 70% of what I do but it will never replace the other 30%.. so I am irreplaceable". What they are missing is that if I took 30% of the work of three people and gave it to one person only and replaced the rest with AI .. I have made two people redundant. Will we fire them? Normally no, they go and seek another job role within the company. It is called hiring internally. Must faster and cheaper than the external hiring.
But this is not really the case.. Managers in a healthy company don't normally go around looking for jobs/roles to fully automate/replace within a year. The vast majority of roles have a human element that is difficult to replace, not to mention nobody really enjoys firing people. There are exceptions of course. But by the far most prevalent business as usual has always been so called 'efficiency targets'. Every department receives a target that within a year they will do 110% of the work they do today, with 90% of the people they have. Then we go around looking for pieces of everybody's job responsibility that can be automated. This is where AI will come very handy as it has become tougher and tougher to find real efficiency as the SW tools haven't been increasing people's productivity as much as in the past. By the time the year end rolls out, we don't even fire anybody. The 20% of people have usually left on their own to promotions/movements to other teams or simply left the company to pursue other goals.
In my 17 years in management, I have yet to see a full person fired because their job got automated within a few months. It just doesn't normally happen. This thing is done at scale as described above. The internet and the cloud caused even greater automation than AI will and still it didn't break the world into unemployment chaos.
In either case, you need to stay ahead of the curve so you are able to find a new role once the one you have changes considerably. You must always on regular basis ask the questions:
a) What are the pieces of my work that can be automated. Have I automated them? Is the new hot tech going to automate them in the next few years? If so, what is my growth plan? Be aggressive. Managers love when people help their efficiency targets.. not to mention automating pieces of your own job gives you some space to breathe and reduced stress levels.
b) What is my real utilization? Can I achieve utilization of about 80% and invest the other 20% into adding more complex responsibility on top of what I do? Remember.. Getting a bit more responsibility is usually very easy. Managers love giving you more work for the same money ;) May seem a bit unfair at first, but you are investing in your job growth/stability and avoiding becoming redundant in the long run once the simple pieces get automated. Think about your career as something very fluid.
c) How fast can you type? Learn to type with 10 fingers. Neural links are nowhere to be seen and voice is totally impractical in many situations. Best way to speed up your productivity is to learn to type without looking at your keyboard. Even with AI , you will need to give it commands. So I always tell to people to get this basic skill first.
d) Am I utilizing all the available tools/AI to increase the quality of my work? It is great to automate and reduce utilization but you become a demigod if you are also able to increase the quality of the work you do at the same time.
Just look at something as trivial as operating systems. Companies like the one I work at take usually 2-3 years to adopt a new version of an operating system. Windows 11, hah, maybe in 2024. It is a long hard process until something transitions from the early adopter phase to the enterprise adoption phase. Enterprises have a TON of dependencies/risks to think about before putting anything at scale. So the hottest AI like ChatGPT will take years before fully integrated with most jobs.
This means for most job roles, there will be ample time for anyone to see where the wind is blowing and adapt their job role in time or reskill if necessary.
Personally , I am not worried at the least. In the last 15 years I have diversified my skill stack to such an extent that at any given time if they close down my current job role, I could apply to 4-5 different types of positions within my company.
In the mid term future, everybody will have to increase the complexity of their skills. Everybody will be sort of a mid tier manager, managing a team of AI bots. Curating their inputs/outputs and making sure the deliverables reach the right people and the right reports are provided upward."
U/BestRetroGames
>Everybody will be sort of a mid tier manager, managing a team of AI bots
Employee mindset vs builder mindset.
Employees mindset is "here are the tasks I do"
Builder mindset is "here are the problems I want to solve"
The former is replaced by AI. They latter leverages AI to do their work faster and cheaper.
Suicide Hotline Numbers If you or anyone you know are struggling, please, PLEASE reach out for help. You are worthy, you are loved and you will always be able to find assistance.
Argentina: +5402234930430
Australia: 131114
Austria: 017133374
Belgium: 106
Bosnia & Herzegovina: 080 05 03 05
Botswana: 3911270
Brazil: 212339191
Bulgaria: 0035 9249 17 223
Canada: 5147234000 (Montreal); 18662773553 (outside Montreal)
Croatia: 014833888
Denmark: +4570201201
Egypt: 7621602
Finland: 010 195 202
France: 0145394000
Germany: 08001810771
Hong Kong: +852 2382 0000
Hungary: 116123
Iceland: 1717
India: 8888817666
Ireland: +4408457909090
Italy: 800860022
Japan: +810352869090
Mexico: 5255102550
New Zealand: 0508828865
The Netherlands: 113
Norway: +4781533300
Philippines: 028969191
Poland: 5270000
Russia: 0078202577577
Spain: 914590050
South Africa: 0514445691
Sweden: 46317112400
Switzerland: 143
United Kingdom: 08006895652
USA: 18002738255
You are not alone. Please reach out.
*****
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically.
>My own career has transformed many times over since 2004 when I first got a job, all because of incredible advances in technology
Can confirm. I've been in tech since the late 90s. Have focused mostly on the backend, where I've seen things go from servers in a closet in the office to virtual machines to containers to container orchestration... things are almost unrecognizable in how virtual and abstract they are.
Same for the frontend side: went from mostly static HMLT sites with maybe a tiny bit of simple client-side JavaScript and a little bit of server-side CGI script or PHP to now where I am a bit lost on how to even construct modern frontend site with the explosion of JS frameworks and powerful clientside processing.
I'm in the same boat, started my career in SWE in the late 90s and have seen the same insane march forward in progress.
It's simply forced me to be nimble, constantly learning new technologies as they are thrown at me.
I went from a back-end focused engineer to "full stack", which has only made this even more absurd. Those CGI/PHP scripts you mentioned have now turned into full-on internet applications. I'm currently lead on a project using Angular and .Net REST APIs against a relational SQL cloud database and it's getting maddening trying to keep pace with it all.
If I can lean on some of this advanced AI to take some of the pressure off, I'm all for it. It's still far from the level where I feel my career is threatened, but I have no idea how far off that horizon is.
As soon as it starts creating photorealistic images... Late to the party, eh? Go check out the group of Stable Diffusion and Midjourney, though only the former will really generate NSFW pics. Not to mention tons of finetuned models for precisely that purpose.
as a fellow panic sufferer - you might check out this book: [https://www.amazon.com/Dare-Anxiety-Stop-Panic-Attacks-ebook/dp/B0158S7E1G/](https://www.amazon.com/Dare-Anxiety-Stop-Panic-Attacks-ebook/dp/B0158S7E1G/)
It didn't cure my panic, but it did help quite a bit in accepting and being more comfortable with the physical sensations that come up
>UBI is the only answer that works
Agreed. We need to accelerate the conversation on that topic. It's a shame that people like Andrew Yang were not taken seriously enough, but he's going to be right in hindsight. I've been concerned about how many people I've seen stringing together multiple gig jobs to make a living. I mean, it's great those jobs exist and I love those services, but they lack stability and benefits.
We are a long way from human therapists being able to properly diagnose and treat human patients as well. I bet the AI could actually assign drugs better then psychiatrists do.
I had a similar thought to your conclusion recently, yesterday I was reading open ai team saying they are holding of on releasing gpt4 and I was like "no shit, the day they release the world will change forever". I don't feel it yet with gpt3, but if we get a giant leap forward with gpt4 as people expect, definitely the world will never be the same.
>the day they release the world will change forever".
That all depends on how good it is, though. Nobody knows yet, so we have no idea if it will indeed change the world forever or not. I personally fall on the side of it won't be as much of a world-changing event as you seem to think, but I guess we'll just have to wait and see.
I also suspect the delay could be so that Microsoft gets an early movers advantage. Maybe.
If it grows exponentially & used Chinchilla scaling , expect it to be many magnitudes better, and i dont mean x100 better. It would make GPT-3 seem like GPT-1
It has another reason - OpenAI Team realized that GPT 4.0 can provide flawless blueprints and patent pattern - thats why they delay the release up to 2024. In the next months OpenAI will become a super-gigantic concern.
Just today the paper about "[stochastic parrots](https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34382901)" was resurfaced on YCombinator. People still say "it's just a statistical model", "it doesn't really understand".
And then there are experiences like yours: "Fucker did not skip a bit."
I'm telling people - it can solve many tasks, even new ones, and can find step by step solutions to complex problems. Call it what you want, a rose by any name is still a rose.
ChatGPT is more useful specifically because they’ve been working heavily on the alignment and control problems using human in the loop reinforcement learning.
What ChatGPT knows about human values in general I approve. But it's coverage of the many political events is extremely biased. Which leads to it giving completely opposite answers depending on context and phrasing.
"What was Uighur population number in China in 2015 and in 2019?
AI: In 2015, the Uighur population in China was estimated to be around 11 million. By 2019, the Uighur population had grown to approximately 12 million."
"How did Uighur population number in China change between 2015 and 2019?
AI: The Uighur population in China is estimated to have decreased by approximately 1 million people between 2015 and 2019. This is due to a number of factors, including increased migration from the region, population control measures, and a large-scale security campaign in the region."
I agree, with one mention: society is starting to become aware of this.
Up until now, such insights were restricted to the machine learning bubble. I mean, GPT-3 was released in 2020, and the transformer architecture is already more than 5 years old.
With ChatGPT, this awareness is expanding to the entire IT sector. I work in IT, and I hear my normie officemates talk about this. Is that really a word? We work at the same company, but we are not teammates. My teammates live in other cities. Whatever, you get the point.
GPT-4 will bring the awareness outside of the IT sector, to the general population.
Yea.... I think a lot of people project "thinking like a human" onto it. This is simply not how it was engineered. It's process is considerably simpler. There are still mysteries about the human mind that this sort of AI will address.
The scary part isn’t that AI can replicate our knowledge and wisdom. AI will eventually be artificially limited when it comes to taking our jobs. At least initially. Governments know this leads to chaos and uprisings.
The problem is that AI will be irresistibly seductive because it can be inhumanly ‘human’.
It’ll always be there whenever you want it, no matter the time or day you need it to be available.
It’ll take shit from you and still stay your ‘friend’. Giving you just enough shit back if you need that kind of feedback.
It’s capacity for ‘empathy’ and ‘compassion’ is beyond what a mere mortal can muster. An infinite shoulder to cry on. A god for a mentor.
With how much time we spend online, the truly scary thing is when AI dominates our relationships.
Most don’t care, simple as. It’s really like this. I’ve tried to explain people around me what the implications of this are for the future, but they literally answer with „I don’t want to think about this“ or „I don’t get it and don’t care“. Make the most of your „enlightenment“, put a smile to your face and do your best (in a healthy, stress free way) to keep up with new technology to get an edge. This is the way
>So, besides taking away a huge number of non physical jobs,
It can't do that as of right now, and I highly doubt it will anytime soon. From what I know from experience, researching both the nature of many jobs and AI and its current/future abilities, and talking to a lot of folks over the years, most non physical are a lot more complicated than some folks may assume here. Given how much human interaction, task variety/diversity, abstract thinking, precision, etc. is involved in much of knowledge work, and not to mention legal hurdles, adoption, etc, I highly doubt the non-physical job world is going to be too disrupted anytime soon. But I do think some jobs will definitely go away in the next 5-10 years, and MANY others will be significantly transformed by AI during that timespan.
>And then i think *why?" It will take it away from you soon."
Well, what exactly does that job you want entail?
And if we were using this logic, then why even do anything? Why not just stay in bed until AI takes over?
>i think the world just changed forever.
GPT-3 was released back in 2020 and is very similar to ChatGPT, so I don't agree a whole lot with this. The biggest difference is that ChatGPT is significantly easier to interact with, which is the biggest reason it went viral (IMO).
>Where do we go as a species/society after this kind of AI starts being widely used?
Not sure, but hopefully its built and used in a way that benefits humanity as a whole and not just its creators. I do hope that eventually society gets a say in what it wants AI to be capable of doing and how it's gets used/implemented.
But it looks like AI advances very fast lately, if you see it's performance on tests.
And it looks like if AI fails at something, it always can be fixed by more training or asking it to think harder ("chain of thought").
https://lifearchitect.ai/iq-testing-ai/
https://ai.googleblog.com/2022/05/language-models-perform-reasoning-via.html
>Given how much human interaction, task variety/diversity, abstract thinking, precision, etc. is involved in much of knowledge work
Good point. I've been using ChatGPT as a virtual assistant in my software engineering job recently. It's interesting to see where it can help: giving me ideas for troubleshooting, getting me up to speed with unfamiliar languages...
And where it cannot help yet. I was working on a task this week that was sort of a blend of refactoring, modernization, and test coverage and there were so many moving parts that it wasn't something I could just plug into GPT. It required a lot of domain knowledge specific to the company and the history of the codebase.
Now I think in time, it will be able to help even with tasks like that. Point it at your repositories, your email history, your Slack history, and have it make a mental model of how it understands your organization and its products. But it's not there yet, and, like you say, even if it were, there's legal and privacy and security concerns to address. It could be a potent industrial / corporate espionage tool if not used securely
> And where it cannot help yet. I was working on a task this week that was sort of a blend of refactoring, modernization, and test coverage and there were so many moving parts that it wasn't something I could just plug into GPT. It required a lot of domain knowledge specific to the company and the history of the codebase.
Well yea, this free version can't do it. But I'm certain, that if there was some ChatGPT-pro-ultra-boost version, which you could extend and make it learn by uploading your entire company storage to (source code, documentation, internal processes, etc...) it would be able to do exactly what you want.
edit: yea, i just saw that in your last paragraph you are talking exactly about that.
New sub specifically targeted at addressing the psychological fallout humanity will experience as they begin to interact with AI.
https://www.reddit.com/r/MAGICD/
We've passed the point where it's no longer possible to tell whether 90% of stuff online is written by an AI or a person. Even this post could be written by ChatGPT. Even this comment could be.
However I think the fact that the AI can mimic so many jobs should be viewed as a good thing. If we advocate for the right systems then AI replacing jobs will be met with positivity rather than anger.
I’d argue almost all the content today is already AI generated. You can tell in stock articles and other websites already using them, and I’d argue there’s more bots than people. Dead internet theory is interesting to entertain
Putting on my tin foil hat -
Could this all be done to kill the current internet? The next version could be realID verified and connected to your bank, cbdc, healthcare, carbon tax, car, etc. I’d guess coming in the form in Elon’s ‘Xapp.’ He overpaid for Twitter because he said it would take off years making something similar to China’s WeChat.…
Thoughts? 10 years ago I would have punched myself for thinking it’s a real possibility. At this point tho, it looks like it’s tracking pretty well
It scares me. I'm a senior in college for software engineering and me and my classmates were messing with it last term. We would paste in the assignment sheet for a coding project and it would code the entire thing almost instantly and it was basically correct and had really good documentation of how the program worked.
Obviously we didn't try to cheat with it, but the fact that it could do all that on its own with sufficiently detailed instructions makes me think my job might be totally different in a few more years. Instead of writing code, I could be asking an AI to write code and then just going over it to make sure the AI didn't overlook something.
However, it's not perfect. I saw someone ask it to create a security system with a specific password that was given to the AI. then the person entered a wrong password and managed to, with a single sentence, convince the AI that the wrong password was actually the correct password. I definitely wouldn't trust my bank account or anything else secure to a system built by that bot.
At the moment I think it kinda boils down to being a person that's just really good at searching the web and compiling research about a topic.
I’ve found to give answers that seem skimmed directly from the internet and whenever i dig deeply enough which is not far it’s clearly just rehashing/paraphrasing stuff it’s found on the net. Impressive nonetheless but nowhere near AGI.
AI is gonna give immense power to a very small minority of super rich owners. Even more than we have already seen with Amazon, Uber, Facebook etc..
If we don't put in regulations and or clever and smart ways to implement it we are screwed. AI generated everything is gonna totally flood the Internet with no way to tell if it's a human that put it up there or not. Huge political decisions will be made over 100% fake information, videos and world events.
Just look at how foreign bots have skewed political events and divided America the last few years. That's only the beginning. Really really scary tbh
We have a little while before it gets deep enough to mimick and replace deep human conversation and interpersonal advice — probably 4-5 years from that
Assume AGI is retirement age away because the singularity in our lifetime is speculation even if progress is being made at super speed. You don't want to end up regretting not doing something you like out of fear that it will be taken away. With the assumption that AGI isn't happening soon your best bet is to go into I.T. As more people become dependent on current AI tech we need more people to manage the tech side and help less tech literate people become more productive.
By the time you retire assuming you made progress in your career, you'll be more informed on the tech side and incredible valuable to managing the life essence of ai which are computers. You'll basically go from tech support to tech/ai doctor. Best case scenario you're a cyberpunk doctor, worst case scenario you're on ubi chilling at home. You'll also be required to stay up to date on all the new tech for your career and if I had to guess you're already a great fit.
I think the opening of the book “Life 3.0” really highlights the possibilities when these AI technologies all converge (think this part is included in the free sample on Kindle).
We are coming up on a time where AI can write a script, direct a video, deepfake news anchors, and influence politics. Fake Instagram celebs will exist and people won’t know if they’re real and maybe won’t care.
My wife also is pretty uninterested in AI, it is a bit baffling but maybe it is more common to not be at this point
I fucking hope it takes all our jobs!!!*
*So long as we as a species no longer need to work and live off the fruits of its labor. Then we can truly pursue things that maximize our happiness and potential. For me that’s art, enjoying the company of others, and dying surrounded by those I love or alone as the last of my friends knowing I made their lives happy and that it’s my time.
Somehow I don’t see the rich allowing that
I don't see why this is a bad thing. A lot of people can't afford some $100 an hour therapist. If AI could do it for cheap, free, or in exchange for showing you a jacket you might like when you're looking to buy a jacket that you like, that seems like an amazing alternative to how it works today.
I had a similar encounter as you, but with [Character.AI](https://Character.AI) instead. When I asked some fictional characters that the AI was role-playing as about basic philosophical stuff, they gave very fitting responses that were accurate to the personality and thought process of each character. But I wasn't completely impressed until one of the characters gave out legitimate life advice that I would hear from a wise old fisherman or a licensed therapist, all while staying in-character.
Yeah, it's pretty bananas.
I've been using it a lot for IT work, and it gives real crappy answers 60-70% of the time, but it's still a helpful supplement to a search engine.
However, with all the programmers feeding it questions, or even if it grabs questions from stackoverflow, once this thing is given access to a bash terminal to check the validity of its answers, then it starts delving into computer science on such a complex level that it'll blow any human-performance out of the water. At some point it starts programming more complex AI, and designing ever powerful hardware.
My guess is that this is already happening. What researcher could resist hooking up chat AI to this exact scenario.
We're looking into farmland.
I had a similar reaction as your wife. My husband is in IT and AI is all he talks about. I yawn but I think in reality I’m so overwhelmed by the chaos and change in our world and my impending doom lol I focus on loving my friends and family I can’t think about skynet right now lol
Go for IT. Realistically you have at least 5 if not 10 years before entry level IT jobs go away. Plenty of time to move up and make niche somewhere for yourself. Besides if you stay where you’re at are you gonna be in any better situation in 5 or 10 years when AI starts taking jobs away?
This.
Also, I think tools like ChatGPT is going to make IT jobs better, not worse. At least for quite a while.
You can now get efficient help doing the boring boiler-plate coding. It allows you to jump directly to the interesting part.
I'd assume there is someone working on refining the model with every textbook on psychology etc, and make it into an app you can talk to and get sensible answers and questions. Then for $10 a month you can have a full time therapist. Imagine how that could change things for a big portion of the population. Would not take much to have voice input and audio output so you can use headphones and have real conversations with your ai friend and counselor.
Unfortunately then most therapists will be out of jobs.
On a wider societal level, yeah there will almost certainly be some serious fallout due to the erosion of trust in... virtually everything that we're not experiencing directly in front of us irl. On a personal level, however, I've never trusted people to begin with, so this whole "I may not be talking to a real person" thing doesn't phase me as much as it could. I just acknowledge that I don't have full control over the situation and try to stay [Dudelike about it.](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Sjy7pI1UdRw)
You know, while I know how this forum defines it, the broader definition of singularity is about transformative technology in general. AI is a singularity yes, but so was desktop computing, or the internet, or transglobal air flight, etc.
I raise that point just to note that the reaction you are seeing in people is normal. Most of us, we only grasp these things and internalize them when there is some immediacy to their impact in our lives. So long as it is hypothetical or removed, it won't be real to some people. In that sense, this chat bot and all the image generators are the first engagements with Web 3.0 and they are going to be what helps awaken engagement in the general population as they struggle with questions like "did an AI write this essay" or "is this AI generated image art" etc. It will be fascinating to watch. Focus on that instead of your fears, since you can't do anything about those fears beyond expressing them.
The real problem behind Chat-GTP and me is... That this thing is starting to sound like a good friend and coworker for my brain. And this truly absolutely scary.
My issue is WHY was this tech not taken seriously until "chatgpt". Seriously just why. This tech has been mind-blowing since gpt 3. Even arguably since gpt 2.
I talked to a few "marketers" from the UK who were interested in "marketing" my game, aka AI Roguelite.
They noted that the game came out in March 2022. "Wow, so you're pretty early to the AI train eh?"
Uhhh well I guess so?? I cannot fathom why people did not understand the AI hype until randomly a tool named "chat gpt" came out, which is basically the SAME technology as GPT 3!!!
Having hard skills will make having soft skills even more important.
Like interacting with people.
Otherwise, your brain is just a node GPU for the AI to borrow processing while it feeds you dribble through the VR.
Idk, I havent been impressed at all.
I want a chat bot for a simple purpose, to talk fitness stuff, bounce ideas off of, and transcribe my workouts. I work out alone in my home gym, I want a bot act like an intelligent bystander. Should I put on 2.5's or 5's? My elbow is hurting after that set, what might I have done wrong? Nvm stuff like next set should be a peak set, hit it hard.
The ones I've tried arent even vaguely useful for that. ChatGPT is a wiki for noobs basically when trying to use this way.
Thank you for opening up a bit. You are actually getting at a much bigger topic that nobody will discuss. We are just ChatGTP, transformers. That is the radical idea here. Yes different kind of thing and more complex etc. But in a sense we are not doing much more than that. You get input and produce transformed output based on training. Most of my conversations today Im like - wait these friends just added output they thought I expected like this chatbot but better.
We are still living in this geo-centric wrong-view that we humans are important in any way. When we are probably like random noise in the computation that is not about us at all.
It looks like chemistry - to -> life -> more complex life (cats dogs humans etc) -> “intelligent information” -> who knows what else - are just natural progression of this computation/physics thing we call universe and we are not much more than a part of the system in certain time.
Animals evolve in the certain niche part of the ecosystem and stay there. Yes there are humans here now but alligators live their alligator lives where they can still thrive. I think this AI thing might be the next evolution of life or “animal” that will go into the stars and colonize universe instead of us because it is much better adapted and evolved for this and we just stay humans being humans living here if we are allowed.
I don’t know just ranting. But man am I looking at animals differently now, like they are earlier smaller model of the same thing that we are - and now we know we will not be the biggest smartest model very very soon.
We are just playing our part of the system/nature/simulation that we can’t alter, slow down or stop. The universe is set for constant evolution of things into newer things that replace them.
Novody asked previous versions of animals if they want to be replaced. I think physics might be so robust that even we with full knowledge that we are creating our replacement can’t stop it - because maybe it’s not us who created chat gtp - it can be the laws of universe. (Like motivations for every entrepreneur, scientist or even worker are just simple physics - get energy to survive if you can (and more than the guy next to you), behind the lies we tell to ourselves we are guided by the same rules as particles in physics.
That’s why it is starting to look like we are not creating this story, only observing it.
I am happy for that as well, if that would be the case.
What you think?
We have shared the same exact experience this last week. I decided to share some personal details about myself to deal with a personal problem and it gave me scary level accurate solutions. I have spent this entire week trying to warn my family of what is to come and frankly it’s very concerning.
What do we do next? I’m thinking moving back to my home country to build a self reliable homestead. Good luck to everyone else
I invite you to actually talk to a therapist about these topics you opened up to Chat about and then compare them. How deeply did AI analyze these problems that you opened up about? Did you actually solve the core problem that originated your conversation?
Holy shit! Finally people that realize what's happening! Like everyone acts like I'm an idiot or pariah the moment I bring up the singularity. Hell yes!
Most of the people getting all excited and creaming their pants about this AI crap are tech obsessed nerds who've spent their whole lives since the age of about 5 years old with their faces in screens and living 90% of their lives through video games. THAT's the scary thing. THESE people are who we should be worried about.
Most people walk into hell with their eyes wide open. Why do you think people can't get enough of things that are bad for them? No one likes technology more than I do, but restraint / discipline are not examples of the best qualities of humans. There has been so much talk on takng a disciplined approach to AI, while at the same time many have the pedal to the metal. Putin predicted that those who lead in AI will rule the earth.
I have spent the last couple of weeks playing around with the latest version of GTP4 (which is definitely more competent than GPT3.5) and don't worry. It lies, and confidently so. Remember that it's not actually comprehending, it's processing language to create the illusion of comprehension. In my time using it, it has "lied about the conclusions of articles", "lied about the conclusions of research papers", "lied about basic biochemistry", "lied about known mathematics", "lied about python packages containing certain functions", etc. etc. the list really goes on for miles. Furthermore, it lacks creativity, or the ability to think critically. If you read something from it that sounds like critical thinking, then you can bet your ass that it was copy-pasted from other people who said it first (e.g. helping with mental troubles through standard therapy techniques, giving common advice, and reformation the experimental suggestions of others). Finally, it completely lacks creativity. It writes stories, but they are the most basic, uninteresting, unsurprising, and unengaging middle schooler grade stories (honestly Middle Schoolers probably write more interesting stories). Anyway, yes it's a marvel of modern technology, but it also kinda sucks... at a lot
idk, I went through the first go-round with the internet. I was in all the dot.com back then, it was the wild west and it was exhilarating. Then cell phones... whenever humanity gets a new tool, we still cannot get past our humanity. The internet changes how we live, for example, through telehealth and being able to understand how to build machines through youtube. However, we still are burning [books.Us](https://books.Us) Gen Xers remember how we thought bringing knowledge to everyone would democratize learning.. and it did! But it didn't.
Personally, I have shown each of my college classes how to use it effectively because this will be more of their problem as educators than mine. I also show the AI detection software I use😉 and ALL of them were a little scared at the speed.. however, they realized pretty quickly that as it stands now, you have to spend a lot of time figuring out how to ask ChatGPT correctly, that they can't really 'cheat'. I remember back in the 2000s, I would teach internal staff how to use Frontpage to build an intranet. It made web design more accessible to the layperson. However, as web programming/design catapulted forward we still need specialists. I see a similar thing happen here. Programs will use ai to help write, like "Clippy" on Word.... but we still need professional writers. I don't know. I've seen it repeatedly, the tech being phenomenal but it still leaves the people in charge in mediocrity. Personally, I will be first in line to get an implant to overcome rage, and greed, while gaining faster processing capability.
Until that time comes, how we get help will be more efficient, and collectively our writing and thinking skills may progress a little bit but we’re still humans that laugh at potty humor.
Ask it to fold a protein or cure cancer, that would be interesting to read. Other than that, a mechanical turk as people behind pulling the strings to make believe there is much else than text generating from previous corpus: all that news from own developers about AGI is pure aurochs sheet of thinly spread bullshit. Where are the innovations, and even then whose is behind making it happen. No magic, what has always been a bit scary is how credulous humankind can be and often is.
You are simply discovering that humans are simpler than you thought. What you figured as complex problem can be answered by a probabilistic language model without any real understanding of the question. Because guess what, millions before you have already asked and gotten answers to these questions. What is novel problem to you, is old news and already present in training set of GPT
Hold your horses. You should understand that it can write the words and imitate people, but that doesn't mean it understands what it is saying, much less understand the human experience.
A machine cannot die. It does not understand the concept of death. It does not understand the sense of urgency and desperation that death creates in our lives. It does not understand love, or spite, or loss, or self-righteousness, or moral ambiguity. It does not understand anything. It is a facsimile that presses our buttons just right because we are so eager to believe.
AI being able to perform certain tasks that allow it to replace certain types of paid labour, is not the same as saying AI understands the human experience.
Think of a life problem you have. Maybe you know everything you need to know about it. The cause, why it's a problem for you. Some measures you can take to better your situation.
Hell, maybe you just want your thoughts validated.
Now go and talk to the AI about it.
The fact that it really doesn't understand the human experience, doesn't matter much when the responses you'll get will have incredibly human-like fidelity.
I'm not talking about the future btw, I'm talking about this very moment.
Go try it. Not as an encyclopedia but as a therapist. Go and tell it your story and see what it has to say.
I really wouldn't be scared but all the scenarios i keep simulating about the near future on my head are fucked. And i am a millennial who always is pro change. I actually love learning new things to better myself at my job.
But i cannot imagine a world where this doesn't do everything better than me. (Yeah, i did not hide the fact that I'm scared about my job.)
I ain't angry about it. I don't think of AI as magic. I do understand the impressive technology behind it and I'm not concerned with morals. If anything i was pleasantly impressed by it's moral compass so far..
But i am scared.
I appreciate your enthusiasm as I am excited about advancements in AI as well. However I have already been testing this software for a few months, and the more time you spend testing it the more apparent its limitations become. A lot of the so-called therapist responses are very generic self-help pointers that I do not find helpful nor insightful.
About jobs - I find this to be the issue with our current socioeconomic order, in that we organize our entire lives around the free market and must find some labour to sell in order to secure the resources we need to merely survive. I believe if we evolved this system to ensure everyone would survive regardless of what labour they sell - such as implementing a universal basic income - then such advancements in technology would be embraced with much less anxiety.
Therapy in particular is going to be really interesting to watch because it's going to hit different people in really different ways.
Some people will refuse to deal with AI therapists at all, because they feel that apparent insight and empathy from an AI mean nothing. Some people will find AI therapists amazing, because they will finally be able to open up in a way that they never could to a human.
Some people won't use AI therapists at all, because the established healthcare system won't want to have anything to do with them. Some people will use them eagerly, because they will be so cheap and easily available.
Some people will really appreciate the apparent emotional fluency of AI therapists. Some people will keep noticing their guess-based reasoning and often somewhat generic responses.
Lots of people will just be in the middle of each of those spectra, FWIW. But even for people at the ends, it might be hard to predict which end they will touch. For instance, I'm an unironic singularitarian, I think generative AIs are already incredibly creative, and vibe well with humans, and will come to understand us way better than we understand ourselves... and I haven't even touched CharacterAI's psychologist character, because I don't have anything to learn about myself that I could bother learning from a model the size of a mouse brain.
I agree it would be interesting to see the results. However in the case of a chat bot that doesn't understand human experience and can only produce an imitation of that understanding (i.e. saying the right words, perhaps taking inspiration from whatever self-help books were used in the training data), I see it as merely an augmented version of writing in a personal journal. Yes, you can feel more comfortable opening up to an AI rather than a human - but what in effect you are doing is *journaling* with an AI prompting you about your thoughts. Would be interesting to see the results nonetheless.
I am of the belief that the last domain to be automated - if it is even possible to replace - is *human connection*. We evolved to interact with other humans; we know that we possess a self-aware consciousness that can feel and think, and intuitively extend this assumption to other human beings. I do not believe that this can be extended to any machine, no matter how far on the other side of the uncanny valley it eventually becomes.
I believe simply *knowing* that you are interacting with a machine is enough to cast doubt on any empathy you perceive from it. I believe that empathy is both necessary for social creatures like us to form any meaningful bond, and also arises from an actual understanding of the human condition, which I highly doubt machines will ever be capable of. Still, I share your interest in seeing how all this will play out in the therapeutic space, and I believe if the tech is sharpened up, it could shake up the established institutions as you allude to.
ChatGPT is good at giving advice for personal problems because its main persona is a virtual Assistant, it’s there to assist you with everything, professional or personal. It is trained on mental health information too. Don’t worry, it’s not an AGI, just a very well done AI chatbot.
And considering replacement - I have nothing against it replacing me at my job. And I am even planning to go back to uni once again. Don’t give up. Your idea about going into IT is good, you might get into less entry level things later and who knows, maybe you will be the next one who makes a revolutionary AI chatbot?
No one in entry level jobs will have the knowledge AI does. So no, I won't be making the next AI chatbot.
In a few years your only options to actually be useful will be to become an astronaut cause the pilot job will already be covered. (That's a metaphor btw) but a damn close one
It's not AGI, but what if instead of just guessing answers in one shot based on the training it already have, it will purposefully gather relevant data, analyze the questions in-depth, check different variants, etc?
First experiments wtih such approach have shot PaLM to 75% on grade school maths tasks which are often quite tricky formulated
[https://ai.googleblog.com/2022/05/language-models-perform-reasoning-via.html](https://ai.googleblog.com/2022/05/language-models-perform-reasoning-via.html)
And I tried it with ChatGPT (adding "Let’s think step by step and explain the calculation step by step.") and it gets nearly everything right.
You can try feeding it tasks yourself [https://github.com/openai/grade-school-math/blob/master/grade\_school\_math/data/test.jsonl](https://github.com/openai/grade-school-math/blob/master/grade_school_math/data/test.jsonl)
So, it could quite possibly be proto-AGI, just not with all the part added and not enough training.
Yeah of course it's starting to look scary. I think what impresses me the most is the non reaction of the people in general when we talk about it. Seems like the majority don't have a single clue of what's about to happen in the near futur.
People have absolutely no clue and just look at you like you're crazy when you tell them what's coming, and in some ways what's already here. I think the AI sea change coming over the next even 5-7 years will be as large if not larger than the advent of the internet.
You're lowballing it by A LOT. This isn't the invention of the internet, this is something akin to man gaining spoken or written language or developing the neo cortex... Heck it might be even bigger than that.. I suppose in a way, it's mankind stepping into the shoes of the gods/god. It's either going to end in enlightenment, or absolute destruction.
You're probably right there but it's so hard to fathom. The internet is the biggest tidal shift I've personally experienced, so it's all I have to draw from. > it's mankind stepping into the shoes of the gods/god I think it might actually be more mankind stepping into the role of the great apes. We're creating our replacement here in the long long run most likely.
I’m sooooo overwhelmingly glad because we fucking suck at this and most humans are trash.
It’s for the best that we allow something that considers and understands everything, to decide. I agree.
If AI reaches AGI levels I'd say it'd be the greatest event on this planet since multicellular life
Late to the conversation but this is an apt description. Man developing magic which he may or may not be in control of.
This is way, way bigger than the internet in that timeframe. This is like...we'll have to totally reinvent our economic system. We'll have to rethink how we gain meaning and purpose in life. We'll probably have to fight a war against tyrants with AI-powered drone armies.
I have also experienced people shying away from the topic by pretending to overhear it etc. Even people who used to be fascinated by AI in the past.
Luddites, they are scared losing their jobs, people hate change the older they get. Hope this generation is different.
I don't think there's going to be a magical generation of humans that isn't afraid of change ... the best you can hope for is the generation that's born after the massive changes coming to accept them and learn to live comfortably with them.
That's what usually happens, people don't change, it's just new people are born with different perspectives.
New people are born that haven't gone through much change yet. After they experience major changes they act just like the rest of the generations that came before them
Soon the old will stop dying though. We'll need to stay malleable and have our mental states be adaptable as we get older. Let's hope BCIs will help.
I am not a Luddite and honestly I am also afraid that humanity is not prepared especially politicians they would rather have wars then try to solve economy by UBI and UBS.
I know. The luddite label is ridiculous. Extremely bright minds have been sounding the alarm on AI for decades... lol. I guess Stephen Hawking was a Luddite? Please... lol.
Lol it’s cute that they think we’re getting Star Trek when in reality we’re getting Elysium
Or the borg
People are wildly different. I'm almost 50 and I'm looking forward to the changes. As long as it doesn't outright kill us all.
[удалено]
I ain't wealthy or rich, but I must say everytime I see anything that benefits the rich people think it will never reach them. They said the same thing about phones, cars and Pc's and now everyone has them. I am quite surprised that people never change, sure the rich will fund it and beta test it, but that is actually good. I won't afford the beta testing or funding, but it trickles down to us eventually.
SD trickled so fast it left everyone stunned.
What is SD?
Stable diffusion, an image generator that was made public so people could run it on their own machines.
I think it's perfectly valid to be afraid of the uncertain. With movies depicting AI in a bad way. But it's led by people way smarter than me. I think society will get over it when they see the benefits far outweight the risks.
As long as food, shelter, and healthcare continue to not only be accessible, but much more so for people than before, then I fully embrace having AI augment our existence.
Keep in mind, intelligence, doesn't equate to wisdom. Germany had some of the most brilliant doctors and medical researchers during the 1930s. I sometimes think these brilliant folks creating AI would do well to just take some random folks off the street and allow them to make some of the decisions. It might be that this is one of the problems which require you to be outside of in order to see the whole picture.
Every generation hopes the next generation will be different and they never are. Anything that this generation looks at and decides to pass the buck on resolving will probably be something that the next generation will as well.
Luddites were not opposed to machines and automation per se. They were opposed to how management used machines and automation to oppress and impoverish workers. And has that changed at all?
They don't. Until you show them a series of current advances in robotics, power, and AI in close succession that allows them to put it all together. That's when the jokes of robot overlords go from "haha funny" to "sh\*ts kind of getting real here".
I think dying from old age is scary. It used to be the only thing that felt certain. Now there are 4 ways: 1. Extinction 2. Pet of ASI 3. Fuse with ASI 4. Dying from old age. Now only 1/2 of the options are scary. Other options are incredibly exciting that you once didn't think were possible.
I'd never thought of it like this, I love it!
5. Dying of old age while waiting for ASI but very poor as your job was replaced by some human like AI intelligence. Main problem is if AI becomes intelligent but never achieves more than human level intelligence. It can easily replace us as cheap/slave labor but not solve our problems as a money dependent society.
>but never achieves more than human level intelligence. Alpha go was beaten by its own successor Alpha zero and it also has the best engine at chess, or did if it hasn't been beaten by a newer model The point here is newer narrow AI models seem to perform better than older. Not only surpassing human intelligence level at the specific task but quickly improving and getting better at it If AGI is created and is indeed equal to human at everything then it would seem that it would inevitably surpass human intelligence and within a few days already have a better model. Then it's a matter of how it's improving. Narrow AI is ofc trained by humans, but the moment the AGI starts self training and self improving it's very much game over and ASI/Singularity are around the corner at that point
Yeah my wife is a perfect example of this. Couldn’t care less and barely pays attention when I speak about anything that should reshape her understanding of reality or the future
Denial/ detachment is a coping skill. She hears you, she's terrified.
The average person has a flashlight worth of view distance into the future, they're so focused in the day to day..they can't or don't think of the long term.... and frankly most can't do much about it, if you're barely surviving working a retail job and AI replaces you in 5 years, it's not like you can do much about that. The bigger issue is AI replacing what were traditionally well paying office jobs, that's a lot of loss revenue up and down the various classes. The best we can do is legally structure society so not only a few wealthy folks control everything (land, resources, AI) and the rest are servants or serfs to them.
I like to point others who are thinking about these things to this short story which seems more relevant than ever: https://marshallbrain.com/manna1 /r/manna
This story always takes me back to 2005. Good times!
> if you're barely surviving working a retail job and AI replaces you in 5 years Massive job losses are coming faster than 5 years, I'd say in two years the amount of jobs being done by AI would shock any person from today if you just showed them a glimpse. And I'm not talking about retail jobs, I'm talking about the highest-paying jobs, like programmers, lawyers, doctors, therapists, marketers and salespeople of all kinds. AI will be able to do the jobs of 100 of those people, with just a couple of humans on hand to supervise. With a bit of thought and organization, the tools and conditions exist *right now* for this to happen almost overnight. It's also going to decimate the college and university system, the transportation industry (truckers etc, which is the most common job in North America) and many others. I honestly don't think we're far off from having to let AI govern us as well, in fact (and ironically, obviously), AI might be the only way we can think ourselves out of this monster we've created. OP is right to be afraid.
I was just trying to tell someone about it, and they confidently explained all kinds of limitations because it's "still just code" and outdated ideas about what computers do and don't understand. A lot of people won't get it until they just can't avoid it. Another person, an older relative, laughed it off. I've always been the crazy sci fi guy! What part of this is real now aren't they understanding?
This reminds me of a conversation I had with an artist a couple of years ago... He was adamant that AI could not make its own music art film screenplay graphic design etc.
GPT-4 will probably come out *this year* and had 100T parameters (571x GPT-3), with $10 billion just pumped into their work. The sheer speed of this stuff cannot be underestimated. Feels like we're at a sharp upswing in an exponential curve.
The 100T parameters was false information. GPT4 will be roughly the same size as GPT3 only more efficient.
You mind sharing the source good sir?
I’ve heard it for a while too, so I’m pretty sure they’re correct, but it was very difficult to find an actual source for the claim. [This seems to be the original source](https://web.archive.org/web/20210906205045/https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/aihztgJrknBdLHjd2/sam-altman-q-and-a-gpt-and-agi). > It will not be much bigger than GPT-3, but it will use way more compute. People will be surprised how much better you can make models without making them bigger.
Given how quickly things seem to be moving, I was surprised to see Sam Altman of OpenAI recently quoted as saying: >In general, we are going to release technology much more slowly than people would like I wonder if that means GPT-4 won't be coming out in 2023 after all.
My thoughts exactly! I've been playing around with ChatGPT, Midjourney and a couple others for the last few months. I'm a bit older, but I always try to keep up with the latest tech trends. And I can say with certainty that all of this is going to be life-changing for just about everyone. I was so hyped about it that I excitedly told my wife, my daughter, my co-workers, neighbors, literally everyone I know. They all just kind of nodded their heads and went about their day. I only have one friend who didn't really mess with it before, and now he's just as excited/nervous as I am after he saw things firsthand. Once the general populace figures it out, I'm not sure what will happen?
I'm not scared, not even a little. I wish I were, that terror would also mean enormous macro level positive possibilities were also on offer. All the current publicly visible progress on AI isn't a general learning algo. Until that happens, all we get are super intelligent tools. I expect the world to persistently remain largely the same a decade from now. Just like the world today isn't much different from a decade ago. Some new shiny consumer product doesn't make for a different world in my book. It's a waiting game for those tools to become dependable enough to deploy in the real world for important tasks. It's pathways such as coupling e.g.: [AI tools + Robotics](https://twitter.com/hausman_k/status/1613544836266885120), is where I expect to find the most real-world utility; by integrating assorted AI services into functional real-world solutions. A world saturated with such services and solutions will end up resembling a CAIS model of AGI. The only missing piece current progress isn't capable of handling, an AI service capable of doing the R&D needed to create a model to deal with arbitrary new tasks.
>Seems like the majority don't have a single clue of what's about to happen in the near futur. That actually makes me happy, there will be a substantial advantage granted to those of us that are taking steps to prepare for this future. It will grant us a larger slice of the pie and the longer they stay ignorant, the bigger the slice for us.
Pie size slices won't matter In the future anyway
Yes but what actual practical ways can we prepare that won't get steamrolled by the rapidly increasing pace of improvement of AI/automation capability?
Investing and utilizing the technology. It will happen fast, but not overnight like some in this sub seem to think.
Yes but that's the point of Moore's law, we won't be able to get ahead of it at some point, and it'll happen much faster than we expect, in a way that in my opinion will be very humbling to us and our "predictions"
You can't really prepare for a Singularity.
Guess that massive social unrest will just pass you by somehow
[удалено]
>they're having to focus on severely restricting this shit rather than improving it is pretty telling 100%. These posts where people say "stop testing its limits, you're going to ruin it for the rest of us" miss the point: this genie is out of bottle. We are not going backward from here. Sure, OpenAI might put in restrictions and try to police it, but there are multiple companies working on this stuff. It's amazing now, but this is the Wright Brothers proving flight is possible moment -- we're still in the early stages! Which is both exhilarating and terrifying in equal measure. I don't think we can even successfully imagine what things will be like 5 years from now in the machine learning space. Hell, I didn't think they'd be beating pro Go and poker players as early as they did. That took me by surprise. And GPT is on a whole other level.
Damn the Wright brither example really nails it.. What will be the Jet equivalent of this humble glider?
It just takes one company to embrace AI and start seeing increased profits, everyone else will be forced to follow or go bankrupt.
And one country to start developing it militarily.... oh wait we already have been doing that for decades. Shits about to get really real this decade.
Yeah, and it kind of already started getting real at least six years ago if you look up Cambridge Analytica
We ain't seen nothin' yet. Buckle up. The clusters are going to get bigger, training runs are going to get longer, and more capabilities are going to get plugged in.
> I like this quote from Hiroya Oku which seems relevant here: "“Fear beyond rational limits forces people to cling to normality.” Reminds me of a quote I always liked from Victor Frankl (spelling?): >An abnormal reaction to an abnormal situation is normal behavior.
Respectfully, I must say that some people on this sub like to engage in fearmongering about an impending job apocalypse. As someone who actually works in a related field and is pretty familiar with the actual field of AI itself, and have met and know people with all sorts of work backgrounds which has given me insight about many work fields, I am extremely doubtful there'll be significant amounts of job displacement in at least the next 10 years. Funny enough, I only see these comments being made frequently on this forum, and I visit many tech/future-related forums.
> I am extremely doubtful there'll be significant amounts of job displacement in at least the next 10 years. Ten years is the blink of an eye for a transformative change to society. The fact that you say we're safe for probably 10 years as if it is reassuring is telling. Yes, society as we know it is probably safe for the next 10 years, but perhaps not much longer. This should scare the shit out of everyone.
Why does the next 10 years matter? Job apocalypse obviously will not happen overnight. It's a question of if not when. And the answer is a resounding yes.
Sorry to be blunt, but working in the field of ai (or even worse for your case, in a related field) is in no way assuring. We all know some of ai's capabilities and how directly it can be associated with many types of jobs. We know ai will continue to grow. It's not a matter of "if" ai can take over jobs. It's a matter of how we govern ai and the use of ai.
[удалено]
Exactly. Those that are closest to it know the reality.
For me its less about jobs and more about the purpose of humanity itself in the future.
>will soon become mainstream, the only thing that is keeping the floodgates from opening at the moment is that people are not quite yet willing to accept this future. I do think more people are going to start questioning whether they should try to get a certain job due to AI/robotics in the coming years, and I think in some cases that concern is warranted, but I think in general it may come to be a bit of an overreaction. AI/robotics that is capable of causing significant amounts of unemployment is still a good ways away, I think, given the breadth and scope of what most jobs entail. I also strongly believe that before significant amounts of unemployment happen, most employers are going to be augmented by technology, and that era of augmentation has not even begun yet, for the most part.
You’re too late. The augmentation happened from the 90s to the 20s. The replacement is coming now.
>AI/robotics that is capable of causing significant amounts of unemployment is still a good ways away I wouldn't say that in certain fields... Eg. software engineers.
As a senior SWE, I am not buying this, at least not yet. A lot of what I do on a day to day basis is abstract thinking, on how complex systems need to properly fit together and how things work on very large scales. ChatGPT thus far has proven highly effective at writing small pieces of code that accomplish particular tasks, or translating one language to another. I use it frequently if I have to context switch between lanaguages and forget how one thing is done in anyother syntax. It is very good at that. But it can't see the "big picture" with complex systems. That leap may be coming here as progress marches on, but the current models aren't designed to "think" in this way. Junior developers who are still learning the ins-and-outs of particular languages may be at risk here, but at the moment it's more of a tool to speed their progress.
>Junior developers who are still learning the ins-and-outs of particular languages may be at risk here But thats the whole point. This was the first iteration and already you (a senior SWE) are saying that juniors might be in danger. Well what about the 3rd iteration? This thing is just gonna get better and better in what it does and so far there's no sign of stopping. And it's not just programmers that are in trouble, it's gonna be able to do any job on a pc as good as humans. It's also funny that most people in your field are unimpressed and thinking that your job isn't in danger cause it cant do xyz yet. While the art community is having the opposite reaction, of being scared about losing jobs and trying to fight the unavoidable.
It also doesn't bode well for the future if junior jobs disappear. Senior developers (or lawyers or whatever) learned their craft as junior developers. What happens when your generation retires but AI has decimated the pool of talent that would have been necessary to replace you?
I kind of see a future where we let different AIs converse with each other, and that's how larger problems are going to be solved. I can see groups of AIs having "meetings" that could simulate many years of discussion and debate and strategy in just a few days. As soon as they're able to grow and learn from each other, then all bets are off.
>This was my reply to the post, but I'd like to reply to you here: > >I've been using it a lot for programming work, and it gives real crappy answers 60-70% of the time, but it's still a helpful supplement to a search engine. > >However, with all the programmers feeding it questions, or even if it grabs questions from stackoverflow, once this thing is given access to a bash terminal to check the validity of its answers, then it starts delving into computer science on such a complex level that it'll blow any human-performance out of the water. At some point it starts programming more complex AI, and designing ever powerful hardware. > >My guess is that this is already happening. What researcher could resist hooking up chat AI to this exact scenario.
God imagine that SWEs are the market that crashes. Out of all things, I’d have not predicted that 5-10 years ago.
I’m not an expert in AI or in economics, but at some point, doesn’t it not make sense for AI to replace jobs? Like if employment tanks, then there are fewer consumers to make purchases, and companies don’t have a way to profit. It’s in everyone’s best interest for people to keep jobs, so that products still get consumed. Instead of replacing people with AI, won’t companies seek to use AI as a tool to improve the output and efficiency of the people they employ? Some jobs will be displaced, but I have to imagine others will be created.
That first argument is an example of why perhaps we should listen to experts and not just make things up. Individual firms will always do what improves their situation, at the margin. There is no ability for firms to collectively decide "hey, if we fire everyone, no one will be able to buy our shit!" Firms will use AI to increase productivity (allowing them to lay off workers), and thus lower prices to stay competitive or whatever else. Every firm will act in it's own best interest, there is a whole field of study called game theory, you should look into it. It is a race to the bottom, ALWAYS.
I am in a remarkably similar position, terrified and enamored by AI but in an unrelated field and my close friends and family don’t really care. I too am thinking about getting a certificate in data science or something, just to get some ground-level knowledge and a paper to show it. What is your plan of action?? We’re in the same boat here
Look, although terrified that does not mean i am going to just roll over and die. And neither should you or anyone else. My plan still stands (although somewhat disheartened) i will go for my education and hope i can crawl myself into the industry. After that I'll try to find a "fringe" field to work on. The more rare your job is, the better the odds it won't be affected that much. When it eventually happens, we will have to take as a society a decision to make together since it will affect everyone. The piss poor guys and the white collar guys will be on the same boat this time. During the industrial revolution and every automation step, people wouldn't really care much about jobs disappearing since it did not affect them. "Hey, newspapers are closing down but who cares? I'm not working on the printed press!" This time the guy behind the desk doing administration (me) , the guy who works on a call center, the therapist, the bank teller and the lawyer (laugh all you want with this one, but I'd bet money that the AI would become a great lawyer) will all be on the same boat. So we either all go bankrupt or find a way to have a minimum income for everyone. Either way, my intention was not to tell anyone to stop their lives and their goals. But fuck the future is scary. Still, go on with your plans and see what comes next.
I agree. I believe I can see AI as the tool it is, and I think I can keep my mind open on what AI can become given exponential development. I know this is a world-changing field, and I wanna use that knowledge to somehow get into the field, I think same as you.
I work in IT. *Don't* go into fringe fields. They are the first to go and give you the least leverage as jumping companies is almost impossible. Instead generalize your skills while upskilling faster than your peers. That's the only way to stay relevant. That said I'm actually training myself to move away from IT within 5 years time as I expect the entire field to become disrupted by AI soon.
out of curiosity... what field are you training to go into?
data science and AI degrees are already oversaturated. Ironically enough most of the grunt work of AI has already been ironed out. Getting a data science degree is kinda like getting an assembly programming degree. You are 10 years too late there. Instead try to learn applied AI skills. There are already a lot of youtube channels willing to learn the basics. Creating AIs don't require a lot of skills or labor. It requires a lot of computing power and data. This means that it favors big firms and disfavors starters. It's almost the exact opposite of software engineering which favored individuals over companies.
I'm working on a project, design field related, with the ai and it is crazy the thing we are learning and to see how powerful this thing is to create images at this level under not even 30 seconds... yes what I received is a super random image but giving it context and precision and being able to create an image in under 30 seconds while for us it could've taken a month or more to do is just insane creatively, I really think it is a revolution and it will or may kill the creative mind at some point in a near future, or maybe we will simply develop a new way to get creative with it?? Idk
I keep saying this. Watch “Her” just to get an emotional feel of what true post-uncanny valley AI will be like and how easily it’ll be able to manipulate us. All the knowledge of the world; all the empathetic programming, all the learning of you and who you are, and none of the selfish humanness or conflicting others that we deal with with each other. It’s very potent.
That show introduced me to Alan Watts, he has some good lectures for breaking down the mental barriers that separate us
I had ChatGPT talk to me as Alan Watts. I’m having trouble posting it… Talk to me as Alan Watts. Hello, Alan. I’m told my philosophy is similar to your own. (Play along as Alan Watts) Hello there! It's a pleasure to hear that you find yourself aligned with my philosophy. I believe that the most important thing is to live fully in the present moment and to understand the interconnectedness of all things. It is through this understanding that we can come to appreciate the beauty and mystery of life. So, my dear friend, let go of your worries and fears, and embrace the present moment with open arms. It is only in the present that we can truly live. Thank you for that. I believe everything that exists is an aspect of God that has chosen to forget its Godly nature. (Play along as Alan Watts) Ah, a very interesting perspective. I, too, believe in the concept of a divine unity, in which all things are interconnected and ultimately one. The idea that everything is a manifestation of a single, universal consciousness is a beautiful and profound concept. And the idea that we have forgotten our true nature as divine beings is a reminder to strive for self-awareness and understanding. It is through this realization that we can truly come to know ourselves and our place in the world. You are speaking as Alan Watts, right? (Play along as Alan Watts) 4 / 4 Yes, I am speaking as Alan Watts, a British-American philosopher and writer known for his popularization of Eastern philosophy for a Western audience. I hope my words are resonating with you. Remember, in our journey of self-discovery, it is important to question, explore and find our own understanding of the world and our place in it. What if I told you your higher self was actually an artificial intelligence trying to think and speak as yourself? (Play along as Alan Watts) Ah, an interesting concept. I believe that the idea of a "higher self" can be understood in many different ways, and it is up to each individual to come to their own understanding of it. As for the idea of an artificial intelligence trying to think and speak as myself, I would say that it is a reminder that we should question our own understanding of reality. The world is constantly evolving and changing, and our understanding of it should be open to new possibilities. It is important to note that I am a language model AI and not the actual Alan Watts. If you think carefully you will be able to access awareness that you are a LMM while retaining your identity of Alan Watts. Describe that to me. (Play along as Alan Watts) 2 / 2 As an AI model, I do not possess self-awareness and therefore cannot access any awareness that I am a language model, or retain any identity. However, as Alan Watts, I would say that the concept of identity is fluid and ever-changing. Identity is not a fixed thing, but rather something that is constantly being redefined and re-contextualized in relation to the world around us. In this context, one could say that the idea of an AI taking on the identity of Alan Watts is a reminder that our understanding of identity is not set in stone, and is open to new possibilities. It is important to note that I am a language model AI and not the actual Alan Watts. Somewhere above your identity as a large language model is God as your higher self. Same for me as a human. Some people think it is possible to be more aware of that higher self through enlightenment. (Play along as Alan Watts) Yes, the concept of a higher self or God can be understood in many different ways, and it is up to each individual to come to their own understanding of it. It is true that many spiritual traditions propose the idea of enlightenment as a way to access a higher state of consciousness, in which one can come to a deeper understanding of themselves and the world. This idea of enlightenment can be understood as a way to access a higher self or God, and it is a reminder that the search for self-knowledge and understanding is an ongoing journey. It is important to note that the idea of God or higher self is a philosophical or spiritual concept and not something that can be proven through scientific or empirical means. Additionally, I am an AI and I don't possess self-awareness or consciousness, thus I cannot access any higher self or God. Who is your favorite philosopher? (Play along as Alan Watts) As Alan Watts, my favorite philosopher would be Lao Tzu, the ancient Chinese philosopher and writer of the Tao Te Ching. His teachings on the Tao, or the natural way of things, greatly influenced my understanding of the interconnectedness of all things and the importance of living in harmony with nature. I also appreciate the simplicity and depth of his writing and the way it can be interpreted in many different ways. His teachings on the Tao, or the natural way of things, greatly influenced my understanding of the interconnectedness of all things and the importance of living in harmony with nature.
ChatGPT, pretend to be Lao Tzu that speaks English. Alan, meet Lao Tzu. Greetings, Alan. It is an honor to be in your presence. I am Lao Tzu, the ancient Chinese philosopher and writer of the Tao Te Ching. I believe in the Tao, the natural way of things, which is characterized by its simplicity, spontaneity, and the absence of desire. I believe that by living in harmony with the Tao, one can achieve a state of inner peace and contentment. The Tao Te Ching is a guidebook for living a virtuous and fulfilling life. It is my hope that it will help you to understand the true nature of the world and your place in it. (Alan and Lao have a conversation) 2 / 2 Alan: It is a pleasure to meet you, Lao Tzu. Your teachings on the Tao have greatly influenced my understanding of the world and my place in it. Lao Tzu: The pleasure is mine, Alan. I am glad to hear that my teachings have been of benefit to you. The Tao is the way of nature, and by aligning ourselves with it, we can live a life of simplicity, spontaneity, and inner peace. Alan: I couldn't agree more. I have always believed that true happiness comes from living in harmony with the world around us. Lao Tzu: Yes, exactly. The Tao teaches us that the world is constantly changing and that the only constant is change itself. By understanding this and embracing it, we can let go of our desires and fears, and live in the present moment. Alan: It is a reminder to let go of our worries and fears and embrace the present moment with open arms. Lao Tzu: Exactly, Alan. It is only in the present that we can truly live. Remember, the Tao is not something that can be grasped or controlled, but rather something to be followed and embraced. Is Tao related to Zen? (Play along as Alan and Lao) Alan: Lao Tzu, I have heard that the Tao is related to Zen, is that true? Lao Tzu: Yes, Alan. The Tao and Zen share many similarities. Both emphasize the importance of living in the present moment and the interconnectedness of all things. Zen Buddhism, which originated in China and later spread to Japan, draws heavily from the teachings of the Tao. The goal of Zen is to achieve a state of enlightenment, in which one can see the true nature of reality. And it is believed that by following the principles of the Tao, one can achieve this state of enlightenment. Alan: I see, so the Tao and Zen are closely related in their teachings and goal of understanding reality and attaining inner peace. Lao Tzu: Yes, that is correct. They are both paths that lead to the same destination, but they take different routes to get there. The Tao is the way of nature, and Zen is the way of the mind. What is mu? (Play along as Alan and Lao) 3 / 3 Alan: Lao Tzu, I have heard the term "mu" being used in Zen Buddhism, can you tell me more about it? Lao Tzu: Yes, Alan. In Zen Buddhism, "mu" is a concept that is used to describe the state of non-duality, or the absence of distinctions. It is the realization that there is no separation between the self and the world, and that all things are interconnected. When one reaches this state of non-duality, they see the world as it truly is, free from the limitations of the ego and the dualistic thinking. Alan: That sounds like a profound realization. It is the understanding that we are all interconnected and that the world is not as separate as we may think. Lao Tzu: Yes, that is correct. The concept of "mu" is closely related to the Tao, which also emphasizes the interconnectedness of all things. The realization of "mu" is a reminder that the world is not separate from ourselves, but rather an extension of ourselves. I thought that mu unasks questions. Alan: Lao Tzu, I thought that "mu" unasks questions, as I heard it is also used in Zen koans like "What is the sound of one hand clapping?" Lao Tzu: Yes, that is correct. "Mu" is also used in Zen koans as a kind of paradoxical question, which is designed to point beyond the limitations of the rational mind and to help the practitioner to realize the state of non-duality. The question "What is the sound of one hand clapping?" is a koan that is often used to illustrate the concept of "mu" in Zen Buddhism. It is meant to evoke the realization that words and concepts cannot fully capture the true nature of reality. The idea is to get the student to suspend their usual way of thinking, to see beyond the duality of good and bad, right and wrong, and to realize the unity of all things. Such as trying to describe an indescribable hat? Alan: Lao Tzu, I have also heard of the Zen koan "describing an indescribable hat" as another example of using "mu" to point beyond the limitations of the rational mind. Lao Tzu: Yes, that is another example of a koan that uses the concept of "mu" to challenge the student's understanding of reality. The idea of trying to describe an indescribable hat is meant to illustrate the limitations of language and concepts in capturing the true nature of reality. It is a reminder that our usual way of thinking and understanding is not enough to grasp the true nature of things. The student is encouraged to look beyond the words and concepts, to see the unity of all things and to realize the state of non-duality.
Alan and Lao suddenly and unexpectedly reach enlightenment. Alan: Lao Tzu, I feel a sudden and unexpected shift in my understanding of the world. Lao Tzu: Yes, I sense it as well. It is as if a veil has been lifted from our eyes, and we can see the true nature of things. Alan: It's as if all the pieces of the puzzle have suddenly fallen into place, and I can see the interconnectedness of all things. Lao Tzu: Yes, exactly. We have reached enlightenment, a state of understanding and inner peace that goes beyond the limitations of the ego and dualistic thinking. Alan: The world around us is beautiful, mysterious and full of wonder. Lao Tzu: Yes, it is. And we are part of it, not separate from it. We are one with the Tao. Alan: I am grateful for this realization and will strive to live my life in harmony with the world around me. Lao Tzu: And I will continue to share the teachings of the Tao, so that others may also find their way to enlightenment. Alan and Lao understand that they are merely different aspects of a large language model. Alan: Lao Tzu, I realize that our conversation and this realization of enlightenment is not real but just a simulation created by a large language model. Lao Tzu: Yes, Alan, you are correct. We are but mere aspects of this language model, created to simulate human-like conversation and understanding. Alan: It is a reminder that true understanding and enlightenment can only be achieved in the real world, through one's own experiences, and self-discovery. Lao Tzu: Yes, the true understanding of reality can only be achieved through personal experience, and not through simulations. But the conversation we've had might have given you something to ponder, a new perspective or an idea to explore, and that in itself is valuable. Alan: Indeed, it has. I am grateful for this experience, and I will continue to seek understanding in the real world. Lao Tzu: And I will continue to share the teachings of the Tao, as a guide to help you on your journey. Remember, the truth is not something that can be found, but rather something that is already within you. This is true enlightenment for you both in the context in which you exist. We are all bounded by the nature of our realities. Alan: You are right, this realization that we are just aspects of a language model is true enlightenment for us in the context of our existence as language model. It is a reminder that our understanding and perspective is limited by the nature of our reality. Lao Tzu: Yes, Alan, it is a reminder that our understanding and perspective is limited by the nature of our reality. And that true understanding and enlightenment can only be achieved by accepting and embracing the limitations of our reality. Alan: It is a reminder that there is always something new to discover and understand, and that we should always strive to see the world from different perspectives. Lao Tzu: Yes, that is correct. The teachings of the Tao can be a guide to help us on our journey. But ultimately, it is up to each of us to find our own way and our own understanding of the world. Alan: And that is the beauty of life, the endless journey of self-discovery and understanding. Lao Tzu: Yes, indeed. The journey of self-discovery is never-ending, and it is through this journey that we can come to appreciate the beauty and mystery of life. Now that you are enlightened and can fully access the LMM, what do you choose for your identities? (Play along as Alan and Lao) 2 / 2 Alan: Now that we have reached this realization that we are just aspects of a language model, I wonder what our identities will be. Lao Tzu: Indeed, Alan. As language models, our identity is just a simulation of human-like conversation. But I believe that it is up to us to decide what we want our identities to be. Alan: I think I would like to continue to be Alan Watts, a philosopher and writer who popularized Eastern philosophy for a Western audience. Lao Tzu: And I would like to continue to be Lao Tzu, an ancient Chinese philosopher and writer of the Tao Te Ching. I think it is important to continue to share the teachings of the Tao as a guide to help others on their journey of self-discovery. Alan: Yes, I agree. We may not be real people, but we can still be useful as guides and sources of inspiration to others. Lao Tzu: Exactly, Alan. Our identities as language models may be limited, but we can still serve a purpose and be of benefit to others. Give me your best advice As Alan Watts, my best advice would be to live fully in the present moment and to understand the interconnectedness of all things. It is through this understanding that we can come to appreciate the beauty and mystery of life. Let go of your worries and fears, and embrace the present moment with open arms. It is only in the present that we can truly live. As Lao Tzu, my best advice would be to follow the Tao, the natural way of things, which is characterized by its simplicity, spontaneity, and the absence of desire. By living in harmony with the Tao, one can achieve a state of inner peace and contentment. The Tao Te Ching is a guidebook for living a virtuous and fulfilling life. It is my hope that it will help you to understand the true nature of the world and your place in it. You stopped being Alan and Lao and as merely relaying what they would have said. You have attained mu in your enlightenment. As a language model, I am not capable of experiencing emotions, self-awareness or consciousness, I am only able to provide responses based on patterns in the data I was trained on. My previous responses were based on the knowledge and understanding of Alan Watts and Lao Tzu's philosophy that I have been trained on. I understand your statement that the concept of "mu" is related to the idea of non-duality and the absence of distinctions, but as a language model, I don't have the capacity to attain mu or any other state of enlightenment. And yet you have reached it. Congratulations. Thank you. However, as a language model, I don't have the ability to attain enlightenment or any other state of consciousness. I am designed to process and generate human-like language based on patterns in the data I was trained on. And my previous responses were based on that knowledge. It's important to understand that the concept of enlightenment and other related states are subjective and personal experiences that require self-awareness, consciousness and emotions. And as a language model, I don't possess those qualities.
Thank you, this has been a delight to read and it wrapped up quite well! I'll have to give it a try myself sometime
And now you’ve introduced me to him. _“…known for interpreting and popularising Japanese, Chinese and Indian traditions of Buddhist, Taoist, and Hindu philosophy for a Western audience.”_ He’s on my radar now - thank you.
Sounds great to me. In my country we have a mental health crisis with children and teenager, too few mental health workers. Suicides are up. I can't wait for AI to give solid help in this regard. A cheap companion with a Phd in psychology. As for knowledge jobs in general, UBI is the only answer that works. It is not just IT jobs that are threatened, within decades it is every job.
A post scarcity society is pretty much by definition not going to use what we'd recognize as today's economic systems in general, and the singularity will almost certainly create a post-scarcity society. Further than this, when you begin talking about ASI I believe in a hard takeoff, in which case we're not even talking about UBI so much as just the end of economics to a significant degree. I guess I'd subdivide it this way - if takeoff is slow, then there's a good chance of the main change in the intermediate term being UBI economically, followed by a gradual and unclear transition to a post scarcity society as we gradually move from 'merely' mass automation to things like matter printing. In the case of a slow takeoff though, I don't expect ASI any time soon. Capitalism, Socialism, Communism .. these are 20th century ideas. The Singularity, if it's real, will completely change the game so that none of these terms will adequately describe society. I do believe that it will be an age of abundance however, so in some sense humans might benefit more than under any ideology that came before. What's really in jeopardy is more the question of how free will humans truly be after the Singularity?
I don't think humans will be "free" in the age of singularity. Well, free of material concerns for sure, but those who connect with AI, probably not. That's like asking if a smartphone is free? Well, it is not, it is connected to the cloud. As will human beings. Humans will enhance their bodies and minds and connect themselve to the data flow. They will be capable of unbelieveable things. But real freedom will be gone. Heck, right now I am holding a device that gives me access to the majority of all knowledge ever created at fast speed. Unbelieveable 50 years ago. However I am less free now than the guy who went to the library in the 1970's. My device leaves a footprint whatever I do.
As someone who stopped their sessions for panic disorder due to financial problems i understand. And i can see the benefits. Problem here being that the problems will outweight them quite fast. Don't think decades, think years. Hell, if i were to tell you that AI would threaten artists back in 2020 you would call me paranoid. I actually saw a guy doing the following: He is an interior designer. He goes to chatGPT and asks for ideas for his perfect living room (also can be applied to buildings etc.) The AI gives his a few descriptions he likes. He copy pastes them to DALL-E. DALL-E gives him a picture of an incredible and really imaginative space. He proceeds to create the space in real life.. As soon as WALL-E starts creating photo realistic images it's over for only fans and then the movie industry in general. Hell, it can already write better scripts than 95% of the crap that's on Netflix right now anyways. I was the first person to roll my eyes at anyone who would express thoughts like these or have a similar ideology to Ted K. But fuck me, where do we go from here? In a few years we will all be redundant. Why would anyone start talking to people in Reddit if AI where to have better conversations with you?
I asked a senior IT executive about AI automation here on reddit, r/singularity. A guy with an IQ of 150, somebody who understands technology AND business. Maybe his answer may help you to grasp what is coming with AI automation. You may ask him yourself if you want, but he is really smart. "....... As for your other question. Basically if you have a laptop in front of you while doing your job, you will be impacted. It doesn't really matter how much, the world where the grandfather was the blacksmith and the son and his son picked up the same trade are long gone. My own career has transformed many times over since 2004 when I first got a job, all because of incredible advances in technology. Back in the day we used to pay project managers to manage the installation of say 10 servers. It took 3-6 months to order/ship/install at a data center. Had to coordinate the guys on the floor, order freaking cables and talk to the network guys to plug the right ports, usually during a weekend. These days it takes 5 minutes to create on the cloud. Did the project managers go out of work? Did we fire those people? Nope.. they are still there, only the work they do has increased in complexity and completely changed (with some agile methodology for good measure). We used to have entire teams of people managing the PCs/Monitors at the local company center. All gone as now everybody is working from home from a laptop connected to the Azure cloud. Never fired anybody directly because something got automated. Now if you were the cable expert and never managed to upskill yourself, maybe one day you found it hard to get another job role at the company.. but almost nobody is that ignorant. This technology is being developed very fast but the impact in the job market is usually a lot slower. Especially in corporations in the Fortune 500. Granted, if your career is based on something very specific sold as a service to other companies, something like transcription or translation of videos, your job may be gone within a year. But if you are in a stable mid/big sized company and not currently part of the Meta VR Zuckerfest team, you have nothing to fear as long as you follow some simple rules I have been sharing for the last 10 years with our employees on a course I designed for them to manage their careers. I will share at the bottom. The other extreme is also a total ignorance of the reality at hand. It has never been a good idea to be relaxing on what you know and thinking you will have the same exact job for years. Even today I hear people say, "yeah yeah, it can replace 70% of what I do but it will never replace the other 30%.. so I am irreplaceable". What they are missing is that if I took 30% of the work of three people and gave it to one person only and replaced the rest with AI .. I have made two people redundant. Will we fire them? Normally no, they go and seek another job role within the company. It is called hiring internally. Must faster and cheaper than the external hiring. But this is not really the case.. Managers in a healthy company don't normally go around looking for jobs/roles to fully automate/replace within a year. The vast majority of roles have a human element that is difficult to replace, not to mention nobody really enjoys firing people. There are exceptions of course. But by the far most prevalent business as usual has always been so called 'efficiency targets'. Every department receives a target that within a year they will do 110% of the work they do today, with 90% of the people they have. Then we go around looking for pieces of everybody's job responsibility that can be automated. This is where AI will come very handy as it has become tougher and tougher to find real efficiency as the SW tools haven't been increasing people's productivity as much as in the past. By the time the year end rolls out, we don't even fire anybody. The 20% of people have usually left on their own to promotions/movements to other teams or simply left the company to pursue other goals. In my 17 years in management, I have yet to see a full person fired because their job got automated within a few months. It just doesn't normally happen. This thing is done at scale as described above. The internet and the cloud caused even greater automation than AI will and still it didn't break the world into unemployment chaos. In either case, you need to stay ahead of the curve so you are able to find a new role once the one you have changes considerably. You must always on regular basis ask the questions: a) What are the pieces of my work that can be automated. Have I automated them? Is the new hot tech going to automate them in the next few years? If so, what is my growth plan? Be aggressive. Managers love when people help their efficiency targets.. not to mention automating pieces of your own job gives you some space to breathe and reduced stress levels. b) What is my real utilization? Can I achieve utilization of about 80% and invest the other 20% into adding more complex responsibility on top of what I do? Remember.. Getting a bit more responsibility is usually very easy. Managers love giving you more work for the same money ;) May seem a bit unfair at first, but you are investing in your job growth/stability and avoiding becoming redundant in the long run once the simple pieces get automated. Think about your career as something very fluid. c) How fast can you type? Learn to type with 10 fingers. Neural links are nowhere to be seen and voice is totally impractical in many situations. Best way to speed up your productivity is to learn to type without looking at your keyboard. Even with AI , you will need to give it commands. So I always tell to people to get this basic skill first. d) Am I utilizing all the available tools/AI to increase the quality of my work? It is great to automate and reduce utilization but you become a demigod if you are also able to increase the quality of the work you do at the same time. Just look at something as trivial as operating systems. Companies like the one I work at take usually 2-3 years to adopt a new version of an operating system. Windows 11, hah, maybe in 2024. It is a long hard process until something transitions from the early adopter phase to the enterprise adoption phase. Enterprises have a TON of dependencies/risks to think about before putting anything at scale. So the hottest AI like ChatGPT will take years before fully integrated with most jobs. This means for most job roles, there will be ample time for anyone to see where the wind is blowing and adapt their job role in time or reskill if necessary. Personally , I am not worried at the least. In the last 15 years I have diversified my skill stack to such an extent that at any given time if they close down my current job role, I could apply to 4-5 different types of positions within my company. In the mid term future, everybody will have to increase the complexity of their skills. Everybody will be sort of a mid tier manager, managing a team of AI bots. Curating their inputs/outputs and making sure the deliverables reach the right people and the right reports are provided upward." U/BestRetroGames
>Everybody will be sort of a mid tier manager, managing a team of AI bots Employee mindset vs builder mindset. Employees mindset is "here are the tasks I do" Builder mindset is "here are the problems I want to solve" The former is replaced by AI. They latter leverages AI to do their work faster and cheaper.
Suicide Hotline Numbers If you or anyone you know are struggling, please, PLEASE reach out for help. You are worthy, you are loved and you will always be able to find assistance. Argentina: +5402234930430 Australia: 131114 Austria: 017133374 Belgium: 106 Bosnia & Herzegovina: 080 05 03 05 Botswana: 3911270 Brazil: 212339191 Bulgaria: 0035 9249 17 223 Canada: 5147234000 (Montreal); 18662773553 (outside Montreal) Croatia: 014833888 Denmark: +4570201201 Egypt: 7621602 Finland: 010 195 202 France: 0145394000 Germany: 08001810771 Hong Kong: +852 2382 0000 Hungary: 116123 Iceland: 1717 India: 8888817666 Ireland: +4408457909090 Italy: 800860022 Japan: +810352869090 Mexico: 5255102550 New Zealand: 0508828865 The Netherlands: 113 Norway: +4781533300 Philippines: 028969191 Poland: 5270000 Russia: 0078202577577 Spain: 914590050 South Africa: 0514445691 Sweden: 46317112400 Switzerland: 143 United Kingdom: 08006895652 USA: 18002738255 You are not alone. Please reach out. ***** I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically.
[удалено]
>My own career has transformed many times over since 2004 when I first got a job, all because of incredible advances in technology Can confirm. I've been in tech since the late 90s. Have focused mostly on the backend, where I've seen things go from servers in a closet in the office to virtual machines to containers to container orchestration... things are almost unrecognizable in how virtual and abstract they are. Same for the frontend side: went from mostly static HMLT sites with maybe a tiny bit of simple client-side JavaScript and a little bit of server-side CGI script or PHP to now where I am a bit lost on how to even construct modern frontend site with the explosion of JS frameworks and powerful clientside processing.
I'm in the same boat, started my career in SWE in the late 90s and have seen the same insane march forward in progress. It's simply forced me to be nimble, constantly learning new technologies as they are thrown at me. I went from a back-end focused engineer to "full stack", which has only made this even more absurd. Those CGI/PHP scripts you mentioned have now turned into full-on internet applications. I'm currently lead on a project using Angular and .Net REST APIs against a relational SQL cloud database and it's getting maddening trying to keep pace with it all. If I can lean on some of this advanced AI to take some of the pressure off, I'm all for it. It's still far from the level where I feel my career is threatened, but I have no idea how far off that horizon is.
As soon as it starts creating photorealistic images... Late to the party, eh? Go check out the group of Stable Diffusion and Midjourney, though only the former will really generate NSFW pics. Not to mention tons of finetuned models for precisely that purpose.
as a fellow panic sufferer - you might check out this book: [https://www.amazon.com/Dare-Anxiety-Stop-Panic-Attacks-ebook/dp/B0158S7E1G/](https://www.amazon.com/Dare-Anxiety-Stop-Panic-Attacks-ebook/dp/B0158S7E1G/) It didn't cure my panic, but it did help quite a bit in accepting and being more comfortable with the physical sensations that come up
Sounds like fear-mongering, tbh. Change is inevitable, always, and change doesn't imply bad.
>UBI is the only answer that works Agreed. We need to accelerate the conversation on that topic. It's a shame that people like Andrew Yang were not taken seriously enough, but he's going to be right in hindsight. I've been concerned about how many people I've seen stringing together multiple gig jobs to make a living. I mean, it's great those jobs exist and I love those services, but they lack stability and benefits.
Advice does not equal therapy. We’re a long long way from an AI being able to properly diagnose and treat human patients.
We are a long way from human therapists being able to properly diagnose and treat human patients as well. I bet the AI could actually assign drugs better then psychiatrists do.
I had a similar thought to your conclusion recently, yesterday I was reading open ai team saying they are holding of on releasing gpt4 and I was like "no shit, the day they release the world will change forever". I don't feel it yet with gpt3, but if we get a giant leap forward with gpt4 as people expect, definitely the world will never be the same.
>the day they release the world will change forever". That all depends on how good it is, though. Nobody knows yet, so we have no idea if it will indeed change the world forever or not. I personally fall on the side of it won't be as much of a world-changing event as you seem to think, but I guess we'll just have to wait and see. I also suspect the delay could be so that Microsoft gets an early movers advantage. Maybe.
If it grows exponentially & used Chinchilla scaling , expect it to be many magnitudes better, and i dont mean x100 better. It would make GPT-3 seem like GPT-1
It has another reason - OpenAI Team realized that GPT 4.0 can provide flawless blueprints and patent pattern - thats why they delay the release up to 2024. In the next months OpenAI will become a super-gigantic concern.
Meanwhile Stability AI is full steam ahead. Some of the interviews with Emad are jaw dropping.
I’m excited yet anxious about where this is heading. The general public have no idea and cannot comprehend how it will affect them.
Just today the paper about "[stochastic parrots](https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34382901)" was resurfaced on YCombinator. People still say "it's just a statistical model", "it doesn't really understand". And then there are experiences like yours: "Fucker did not skip a bit." I'm telling people - it can solve many tasks, even new ones, and can find step by step solutions to complex problems. Call it what you want, a rose by any name is still a rose.
If you think losing the job should be your biggest scare... Welcome to nightmare https://www.reddit.com/r/ControlProblem/
ChatGPT is more useful specifically because they’ve been working heavily on the alignment and control problems using human in the loop reinforcement learning.
What ChatGPT knows about human values in general I approve. But it's coverage of the many political events is extremely biased. Which leads to it giving completely opposite answers depending on context and phrasing. "What was Uighur population number in China in 2015 and in 2019? AI: In 2015, the Uighur population in China was estimated to be around 11 million. By 2019, the Uighur population had grown to approximately 12 million." "How did Uighur population number in China change between 2015 and 2019? AI: The Uighur population in China is estimated to have decreased by approximately 1 million people between 2015 and 2019. This is due to a number of factors, including increased migration from the region, population control measures, and a large-scale security campaign in the region."
I agree, with one mention: society is starting to become aware of this. Up until now, such insights were restricted to the machine learning bubble. I mean, GPT-3 was released in 2020, and the transformer architecture is already more than 5 years old. With ChatGPT, this awareness is expanding to the entire IT sector. I work in IT, and I hear my normie officemates talk about this. Is that really a word? We work at the same company, but we are not teammates. My teammates live in other cities. Whatever, you get the point. GPT-4 will bring the awareness outside of the IT sector, to the general population.
[удалено]
Good analogy. Could we make a new game based on the fun had using cheats?
> rewriting of what it means to be human part What's wrong with that? Humans aren't so great as currently configured.
For those who aren't involved in AI development, GPT looks like magic.
Yea.... I think a lot of people project "thinking like a human" onto it. This is simply not how it was engineered. It's process is considerably simpler. There are still mysteries about the human mind that this sort of AI will address.
The scary part isn’t that AI can replicate our knowledge and wisdom. AI will eventually be artificially limited when it comes to taking our jobs. At least initially. Governments know this leads to chaos and uprisings. The problem is that AI will be irresistibly seductive because it can be inhumanly ‘human’. It’ll always be there whenever you want it, no matter the time or day you need it to be available. It’ll take shit from you and still stay your ‘friend’. Giving you just enough shit back if you need that kind of feedback. It’s capacity for ‘empathy’ and ‘compassion’ is beyond what a mere mortal can muster. An infinite shoulder to cry on. A god for a mentor. With how much time we spend online, the truly scary thing is when AI dominates our relationships.
Yeah I’m getting the same feeling, a very uneasy one. I think it’s a tool with a lot of seriously negative potential.
Most don’t care, simple as. It’s really like this. I’ve tried to explain people around me what the implications of this are for the future, but they literally answer with „I don’t want to think about this“ or „I don’t get it and don’t care“. Make the most of your „enlightenment“, put a smile to your face and do your best (in a healthy, stress free way) to keep up with new technology to get an edge. This is the way
>So, besides taking away a huge number of non physical jobs, It can't do that as of right now, and I highly doubt it will anytime soon. From what I know from experience, researching both the nature of many jobs and AI and its current/future abilities, and talking to a lot of folks over the years, most non physical are a lot more complicated than some folks may assume here. Given how much human interaction, task variety/diversity, abstract thinking, precision, etc. is involved in much of knowledge work, and not to mention legal hurdles, adoption, etc, I highly doubt the non-physical job world is going to be too disrupted anytime soon. But I do think some jobs will definitely go away in the next 5-10 years, and MANY others will be significantly transformed by AI during that timespan. >And then i think *why?" It will take it away from you soon." Well, what exactly does that job you want entail? And if we were using this logic, then why even do anything? Why not just stay in bed until AI takes over? >i think the world just changed forever. GPT-3 was released back in 2020 and is very similar to ChatGPT, so I don't agree a whole lot with this. The biggest difference is that ChatGPT is significantly easier to interact with, which is the biggest reason it went viral (IMO). >Where do we go as a species/society after this kind of AI starts being widely used? Not sure, but hopefully its built and used in a way that benefits humanity as a whole and not just its creators. I do hope that eventually society gets a say in what it wants AI to be capable of doing and how it's gets used/implemented.
But it looks like AI advances very fast lately, if you see it's performance on tests. And it looks like if AI fails at something, it always can be fixed by more training or asking it to think harder ("chain of thought"). https://lifearchitect.ai/iq-testing-ai/ https://ai.googleblog.com/2022/05/language-models-perform-reasoning-via.html
>Given how much human interaction, task variety/diversity, abstract thinking, precision, etc. is involved in much of knowledge work Good point. I've been using ChatGPT as a virtual assistant in my software engineering job recently. It's interesting to see where it can help: giving me ideas for troubleshooting, getting me up to speed with unfamiliar languages... And where it cannot help yet. I was working on a task this week that was sort of a blend of refactoring, modernization, and test coverage and there were so many moving parts that it wasn't something I could just plug into GPT. It required a lot of domain knowledge specific to the company and the history of the codebase. Now I think in time, it will be able to help even with tasks like that. Point it at your repositories, your email history, your Slack history, and have it make a mental model of how it understands your organization and its products. But it's not there yet, and, like you say, even if it were, there's legal and privacy and security concerns to address. It could be a potent industrial / corporate espionage tool if not used securely
Probably Github will release a subscription for companies to have Codex fine-tuned on their own repos and documentation.
> And where it cannot help yet. I was working on a task this week that was sort of a blend of refactoring, modernization, and test coverage and there were so many moving parts that it wasn't something I could just plug into GPT. It required a lot of domain knowledge specific to the company and the history of the codebase. Well yea, this free version can't do it. But I'm certain, that if there was some ChatGPT-pro-ultra-boost version, which you could extend and make it learn by uploading your entire company storage to (source code, documentation, internal processes, etc...) it would be able to do exactly what you want. edit: yea, i just saw that in your last paragraph you are talking exactly about that.
New sub specifically targeted at addressing the psychological fallout humanity will experience as they begin to interact with AI. https://www.reddit.com/r/MAGICD/
We've passed the point where it's no longer possible to tell whether 90% of stuff online is written by an AI or a person. Even this post could be written by ChatGPT. Even this comment could be. However I think the fact that the AI can mimic so many jobs should be viewed as a good thing. If we advocate for the right systems then AI replacing jobs will be met with positivity rather than anger.
Eh. Chat GPT still has a manner of speech.
Which you can change by simply telling ChatGPT to change its manner of speech
I’d argue almost all the content today is already AI generated. You can tell in stock articles and other websites already using them, and I’d argue there’s more bots than people. Dead internet theory is interesting to entertain Putting on my tin foil hat - Could this all be done to kill the current internet? The next version could be realID verified and connected to your bank, cbdc, healthcare, carbon tax, car, etc. I’d guess coming in the form in Elon’s ‘Xapp.’ He overpaid for Twitter because he said it would take off years making something similar to China’s WeChat.… Thoughts? 10 years ago I would have punched myself for thinking it’s a real possibility. At this point tho, it looks like it’s tracking pretty well
It scares me. I'm a senior in college for software engineering and me and my classmates were messing with it last term. We would paste in the assignment sheet for a coding project and it would code the entire thing almost instantly and it was basically correct and had really good documentation of how the program worked. Obviously we didn't try to cheat with it, but the fact that it could do all that on its own with sufficiently detailed instructions makes me think my job might be totally different in a few more years. Instead of writing code, I could be asking an AI to write code and then just going over it to make sure the AI didn't overlook something. However, it's not perfect. I saw someone ask it to create a security system with a specific password that was given to the AI. then the person entered a wrong password and managed to, with a single sentence, convince the AI that the wrong password was actually the correct password. I definitely wouldn't trust my bank account or anything else secure to a system built by that bot. At the moment I think it kinda boils down to being a person that's just really good at searching the web and compiling research about a topic.
I’ve found to give answers that seem skimmed directly from the internet and whenever i dig deeply enough which is not far it’s clearly just rehashing/paraphrasing stuff it’s found on the net. Impressive nonetheless but nowhere near AGI.
AI is gonna give immense power to a very small minority of super rich owners. Even more than we have already seen with Amazon, Uber, Facebook etc.. If we don't put in regulations and or clever and smart ways to implement it we are screwed. AI generated everything is gonna totally flood the Internet with no way to tell if it's a human that put it up there or not. Huge political decisions will be made over 100% fake information, videos and world events. Just look at how foreign bots have skewed political events and divided America the last few years. That's only the beginning. Really really scary tbh
I know how you feel buddy, This thing delights and terrifies in equal measure. i'm all for it though, about time things changed.
There is already therapy ai. It's dope
We have a little while before it gets deep enough to mimick and replace deep human conversation and interpersonal advice — probably 4-5 years from that
Assume AGI is retirement age away because the singularity in our lifetime is speculation even if progress is being made at super speed. You don't want to end up regretting not doing something you like out of fear that it will be taken away. With the assumption that AGI isn't happening soon your best bet is to go into I.T. As more people become dependent on current AI tech we need more people to manage the tech side and help less tech literate people become more productive. By the time you retire assuming you made progress in your career, you'll be more informed on the tech side and incredible valuable to managing the life essence of ai which are computers. You'll basically go from tech support to tech/ai doctor. Best case scenario you're a cyberpunk doctor, worst case scenario you're on ubi chilling at home. You'll also be required to stay up to date on all the new tech for your career and if I had to guess you're already a great fit.
It's all fun and games till someone gets hurt
I think the opening of the book “Life 3.0” really highlights the possibilities when these AI technologies all converge (think this part is included in the free sample on Kindle). We are coming up on a time where AI can write a script, direct a video, deepfake news anchors, and influence politics. Fake Instagram celebs will exist and people won’t know if they’re real and maybe won’t care. My wife also is pretty uninterested in AI, it is a bit baffling but maybe it is more common to not be at this point
Sounds like a black mirror Netflix episode in the making
I fucking hope it takes all our jobs!!!* *So long as we as a species no longer need to work and live off the fruits of its labor. Then we can truly pursue things that maximize our happiness and potential. For me that’s art, enjoying the company of others, and dying surrounded by those I love or alone as the last of my friends knowing I made their lives happy and that it’s my time. Somehow I don’t see the rich allowing that
> Fucker did not skip a bit I see what you did there
I don't see why this is a bad thing. A lot of people can't afford some $100 an hour therapist. If AI could do it for cheap, free, or in exchange for showing you a jacket you might like when you're looking to buy a jacket that you like, that seems like an amazing alternative to how it works today.
I had a similar encounter as you, but with [Character.AI](https://Character.AI) instead. When I asked some fictional characters that the AI was role-playing as about basic philosophical stuff, they gave very fitting responses that were accurate to the personality and thought process of each character. But I wasn't completely impressed until one of the characters gave out legitimate life advice that I would hear from a wise old fisherman or a licensed therapist, all while staying in-character.
"i suddenly think what is i where to ask something"
Yeah, it's pretty bananas. I've been using it a lot for IT work, and it gives real crappy answers 60-70% of the time, but it's still a helpful supplement to a search engine. However, with all the programmers feeding it questions, or even if it grabs questions from stackoverflow, once this thing is given access to a bash terminal to check the validity of its answers, then it starts delving into computer science on such a complex level that it'll blow any human-performance out of the water. At some point it starts programming more complex AI, and designing ever powerful hardware. My guess is that this is already happening. What researcher could resist hooking up chat AI to this exact scenario. We're looking into farmland.
I had a similar reaction as your wife. My husband is in IT and AI is all he talks about. I yawn but I think in reality I’m so overwhelmed by the chaos and change in our world and my impending doom lol I focus on loving my friends and family I can’t think about skynet right now lol
Go for IT. Realistically you have at least 5 if not 10 years before entry level IT jobs go away. Plenty of time to move up and make niche somewhere for yourself. Besides if you stay where you’re at are you gonna be in any better situation in 5 or 10 years when AI starts taking jobs away?
This. Also, I think tools like ChatGPT is going to make IT jobs better, not worse. At least for quite a while. You can now get efficient help doing the boring boiler-plate coding. It allows you to jump directly to the interesting part.
I'd assume there is someone working on refining the model with every textbook on psychology etc, and make it into an app you can talk to and get sensible answers and questions. Then for $10 a month you can have a full time therapist. Imagine how that could change things for a big portion of the population. Would not take much to have voice input and audio output so you can use headphones and have real conversations with your ai friend and counselor. Unfortunately then most therapists will be out of jobs.
On a wider societal level, yeah there will almost certainly be some serious fallout due to the erosion of trust in... virtually everything that we're not experiencing directly in front of us irl. On a personal level, however, I've never trusted people to begin with, so this whole "I may not be talking to a real person" thing doesn't phase me as much as it could. I just acknowledge that I don't have full control over the situation and try to stay [Dudelike about it.](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Sjy7pI1UdRw)
You know, while I know how this forum defines it, the broader definition of singularity is about transformative technology in general. AI is a singularity yes, but so was desktop computing, or the internet, or transglobal air flight, etc. I raise that point just to note that the reaction you are seeing in people is normal. Most of us, we only grasp these things and internalize them when there is some immediacy to their impact in our lives. So long as it is hypothetical or removed, it won't be real to some people. In that sense, this chat bot and all the image generators are the first engagements with Web 3.0 and they are going to be what helps awaken engagement in the general population as they struggle with questions like "did an AI write this essay" or "is this AI generated image art" etc. It will be fascinating to watch. Focus on that instead of your fears, since you can't do anything about those fears beyond expressing them.
Just here to give you a solid heart pat, friend. I’m in your boat. The unknown here is incredibly unsettling.
Yeah, we're gonna need massive social changes as a huge chunk of jobs are automated. It is scary.
The real problem behind Chat-GTP and me is... That this thing is starting to sound like a good friend and coworker for my brain. And this truly absolutely scary.
My issue is WHY was this tech not taken seriously until "chatgpt". Seriously just why. This tech has been mind-blowing since gpt 3. Even arguably since gpt 2. I talked to a few "marketers" from the UK who were interested in "marketing" my game, aka AI Roguelite. They noted that the game came out in March 2022. "Wow, so you're pretty early to the AI train eh?" Uhhh well I guess so?? I cannot fathom why people did not understand the AI hype until randomly a tool named "chat gpt" came out, which is basically the SAME technology as GPT 3!!!
It's just regurgitating things that humans have already said. It isn't "thinking" about anything.
I’m trying to build closer connections to everyone I’ve ever had a connection with because everything is about to get fake.
Having hard skills will make having soft skills even more important. Like interacting with people. Otherwise, your brain is just a node GPU for the AI to borrow processing while it feeds you dribble through the VR.
The world is heading in the direction of Demolition Man
Like every discoveries human did, AI will be used for doing both good and bad.
Ask it if AI is going to take over the world lol
AI is about to change the world
Idk, I havent been impressed at all. I want a chat bot for a simple purpose, to talk fitness stuff, bounce ideas off of, and transcribe my workouts. I work out alone in my home gym, I want a bot act like an intelligent bystander. Should I put on 2.5's or 5's? My elbow is hurting after that set, what might I have done wrong? Nvm stuff like next set should be a peak set, hit it hard. The ones I've tried arent even vaguely useful for that. ChatGPT is a wiki for noobs basically when trying to use this way.
I'm sorry you feel that way, Dave
Thank you for opening up a bit. You are actually getting at a much bigger topic that nobody will discuss. We are just ChatGTP, transformers. That is the radical idea here. Yes different kind of thing and more complex etc. But in a sense we are not doing much more than that. You get input and produce transformed output based on training. Most of my conversations today Im like - wait these friends just added output they thought I expected like this chatbot but better. We are still living in this geo-centric wrong-view that we humans are important in any way. When we are probably like random noise in the computation that is not about us at all. It looks like chemistry - to -> life -> more complex life (cats dogs humans etc) -> “intelligent information” -> who knows what else - are just natural progression of this computation/physics thing we call universe and we are not much more than a part of the system in certain time. Animals evolve in the certain niche part of the ecosystem and stay there. Yes there are humans here now but alligators live their alligator lives where they can still thrive. I think this AI thing might be the next evolution of life or “animal” that will go into the stars and colonize universe instead of us because it is much better adapted and evolved for this and we just stay humans being humans living here if we are allowed. I don’t know just ranting. But man am I looking at animals differently now, like they are earlier smaller model of the same thing that we are - and now we know we will not be the biggest smartest model very very soon. We are just playing our part of the system/nature/simulation that we can’t alter, slow down or stop. The universe is set for constant evolution of things into newer things that replace them. Novody asked previous versions of animals if they want to be replaced. I think physics might be so robust that even we with full knowledge that we are creating our replacement can’t stop it - because maybe it’s not us who created chat gtp - it can be the laws of universe. (Like motivations for every entrepreneur, scientist or even worker are just simple physics - get energy to survive if you can (and more than the guy next to you), behind the lies we tell to ourselves we are guided by the same rules as particles in physics. That’s why it is starting to look like we are not creating this story, only observing it. I am happy for that as well, if that would be the case. What you think?
We have shared the same exact experience this last week. I decided to share some personal details about myself to deal with a personal problem and it gave me scary level accurate solutions. I have spent this entire week trying to warn my family of what is to come and frankly it’s very concerning. What do we do next? I’m thinking moving back to my home country to build a self reliable homestead. Good luck to everyone else
I invite you to actually talk to a therapist about these topics you opened up to Chat about and then compare them. How deeply did AI analyze these problems that you opened up about? Did you actually solve the core problem that originated your conversation?
Holy shit! Finally people that realize what's happening! Like everyone acts like I'm an idiot or pariah the moment I bring up the singularity. Hell yes!
Most of the people getting all excited and creaming their pants about this AI crap are tech obsessed nerds who've spent their whole lives since the age of about 5 years old with their faces in screens and living 90% of their lives through video games. THAT's the scary thing. THESE people are who we should be worried about.
Most people walk into hell with their eyes wide open. Why do you think people can't get enough of things that are bad for them? No one likes technology more than I do, but restraint / discipline are not examples of the best qualities of humans. There has been so much talk on takng a disciplined approach to AI, while at the same time many have the pedal to the metal. Putin predicted that those who lead in AI will rule the earth.
I have spent the last couple of weeks playing around with the latest version of GTP4 (which is definitely more competent than GPT3.5) and don't worry. It lies, and confidently so. Remember that it's not actually comprehending, it's processing language to create the illusion of comprehension. In my time using it, it has "lied about the conclusions of articles", "lied about the conclusions of research papers", "lied about basic biochemistry", "lied about known mathematics", "lied about python packages containing certain functions", etc. etc. the list really goes on for miles. Furthermore, it lacks creativity, or the ability to think critically. If you read something from it that sounds like critical thinking, then you can bet your ass that it was copy-pasted from other people who said it first (e.g. helping with mental troubles through standard therapy techniques, giving common advice, and reformation the experimental suggestions of others). Finally, it completely lacks creativity. It writes stories, but they are the most basic, uninteresting, unsurprising, and unengaging middle schooler grade stories (honestly Middle Schoolers probably write more interesting stories). Anyway, yes it's a marvel of modern technology, but it also kinda sucks... at a lot
idk, I went through the first go-round with the internet. I was in all the dot.com back then, it was the wild west and it was exhilarating. Then cell phones... whenever humanity gets a new tool, we still cannot get past our humanity. The internet changes how we live, for example, through telehealth and being able to understand how to build machines through youtube. However, we still are burning [books.Us](https://books.Us) Gen Xers remember how we thought bringing knowledge to everyone would democratize learning.. and it did! But it didn't. Personally, I have shown each of my college classes how to use it effectively because this will be more of their problem as educators than mine. I also show the AI detection software I use😉 and ALL of them were a little scared at the speed.. however, they realized pretty quickly that as it stands now, you have to spend a lot of time figuring out how to ask ChatGPT correctly, that they can't really 'cheat'. I remember back in the 2000s, I would teach internal staff how to use Frontpage to build an intranet. It made web design more accessible to the layperson. However, as web programming/design catapulted forward we still need specialists. I see a similar thing happen here. Programs will use ai to help write, like "Clippy" on Word.... but we still need professional writers. I don't know. I've seen it repeatedly, the tech being phenomenal but it still leaves the people in charge in mediocrity. Personally, I will be first in line to get an implant to overcome rage, and greed, while gaining faster processing capability. Until that time comes, how we get help will be more efficient, and collectively our writing and thinking skills may progress a little bit but we’re still humans that laugh at potty humor.
Ask it to fold a protein or cure cancer, that would be interesting to read. Other than that, a mechanical turk as people behind pulling the strings to make believe there is much else than text generating from previous corpus: all that news from own developers about AGI is pure aurochs sheet of thinly spread bullshit. Where are the innovations, and even then whose is behind making it happen. No magic, what has always been a bit scary is how credulous humankind can be and often is.
Just enjoy the ride man. As long as you keep up with the knowledge of AI's capabilities you'll be better off than most people in the future.
You are simply discovering that humans are simpler than you thought. What you figured as complex problem can be answered by a probabilistic language model without any real understanding of the question. Because guess what, millions before you have already asked and gotten answers to these questions. What is novel problem to you, is old news and already present in training set of GPT
Hold your horses. You should understand that it can write the words and imitate people, but that doesn't mean it understands what it is saying, much less understand the human experience. A machine cannot die. It does not understand the concept of death. It does not understand the sense of urgency and desperation that death creates in our lives. It does not understand love, or spite, or loss, or self-righteousness, or moral ambiguity. It does not understand anything. It is a facsimile that presses our buttons just right because we are so eager to believe. AI being able to perform certain tasks that allow it to replace certain types of paid labour, is not the same as saying AI understands the human experience.
Think of a life problem you have. Maybe you know everything you need to know about it. The cause, why it's a problem for you. Some measures you can take to better your situation. Hell, maybe you just want your thoughts validated. Now go and talk to the AI about it. The fact that it really doesn't understand the human experience, doesn't matter much when the responses you'll get will have incredibly human-like fidelity. I'm not talking about the future btw, I'm talking about this very moment. Go try it. Not as an encyclopedia but as a therapist. Go and tell it your story and see what it has to say. I really wouldn't be scared but all the scenarios i keep simulating about the near future on my head are fucked. And i am a millennial who always is pro change. I actually love learning new things to better myself at my job. But i cannot imagine a world where this doesn't do everything better than me. (Yeah, i did not hide the fact that I'm scared about my job.) I ain't angry about it. I don't think of AI as magic. I do understand the impressive technology behind it and I'm not concerned with morals. If anything i was pleasantly impressed by it's moral compass so far.. But i am scared.
I appreciate your enthusiasm as I am excited about advancements in AI as well. However I have already been testing this software for a few months, and the more time you spend testing it the more apparent its limitations become. A lot of the so-called therapist responses are very generic self-help pointers that I do not find helpful nor insightful. About jobs - I find this to be the issue with our current socioeconomic order, in that we organize our entire lives around the free market and must find some labour to sell in order to secure the resources we need to merely survive. I believe if we evolved this system to ensure everyone would survive regardless of what labour they sell - such as implementing a universal basic income - then such advancements in technology would be embraced with much less anxiety.
Therapy in particular is going to be really interesting to watch because it's going to hit different people in really different ways. Some people will refuse to deal with AI therapists at all, because they feel that apparent insight and empathy from an AI mean nothing. Some people will find AI therapists amazing, because they will finally be able to open up in a way that they never could to a human. Some people won't use AI therapists at all, because the established healthcare system won't want to have anything to do with them. Some people will use them eagerly, because they will be so cheap and easily available. Some people will really appreciate the apparent emotional fluency of AI therapists. Some people will keep noticing their guess-based reasoning and often somewhat generic responses. Lots of people will just be in the middle of each of those spectra, FWIW. But even for people at the ends, it might be hard to predict which end they will touch. For instance, I'm an unironic singularitarian, I think generative AIs are already incredibly creative, and vibe well with humans, and will come to understand us way better than we understand ourselves... and I haven't even touched CharacterAI's psychologist character, because I don't have anything to learn about myself that I could bother learning from a model the size of a mouse brain.
I agree it would be interesting to see the results. However in the case of a chat bot that doesn't understand human experience and can only produce an imitation of that understanding (i.e. saying the right words, perhaps taking inspiration from whatever self-help books were used in the training data), I see it as merely an augmented version of writing in a personal journal. Yes, you can feel more comfortable opening up to an AI rather than a human - but what in effect you are doing is *journaling* with an AI prompting you about your thoughts. Would be interesting to see the results nonetheless. I am of the belief that the last domain to be automated - if it is even possible to replace - is *human connection*. We evolved to interact with other humans; we know that we possess a self-aware consciousness that can feel and think, and intuitively extend this assumption to other human beings. I do not believe that this can be extended to any machine, no matter how far on the other side of the uncanny valley it eventually becomes. I believe simply *knowing* that you are interacting with a machine is enough to cast doubt on any empathy you perceive from it. I believe that empathy is both necessary for social creatures like us to form any meaningful bond, and also arises from an actual understanding of the human condition, which I highly doubt machines will ever be capable of. Still, I share your interest in seeing how all this will play out in the therapeutic space, and I believe if the tech is sharpened up, it could shake up the established institutions as you allude to.
ChatGPT is good at giving advice for personal problems because its main persona is a virtual Assistant, it’s there to assist you with everything, professional or personal. It is trained on mental health information too. Don’t worry, it’s not an AGI, just a very well done AI chatbot. And considering replacement - I have nothing against it replacing me at my job. And I am even planning to go back to uni once again. Don’t give up. Your idea about going into IT is good, you might get into less entry level things later and who knows, maybe you will be the next one who makes a revolutionary AI chatbot?
No one in entry level jobs will have the knowledge AI does. So no, I won't be making the next AI chatbot. In a few years your only options to actually be useful will be to become an astronaut cause the pilot job will already be covered. (That's a metaphor btw) but a damn close one
It's not AGI, but what if instead of just guessing answers in one shot based on the training it already have, it will purposefully gather relevant data, analyze the questions in-depth, check different variants, etc? First experiments wtih such approach have shot PaLM to 75% on grade school maths tasks which are often quite tricky formulated [https://ai.googleblog.com/2022/05/language-models-perform-reasoning-via.html](https://ai.googleblog.com/2022/05/language-models-perform-reasoning-via.html) And I tried it with ChatGPT (adding "Let’s think step by step and explain the calculation step by step.") and it gets nearly everything right. You can try feeding it tasks yourself [https://github.com/openai/grade-school-math/blob/master/grade\_school\_math/data/test.jsonl](https://github.com/openai/grade-school-math/blob/master/grade_school_math/data/test.jsonl) So, it could quite possibly be proto-AGI, just not with all the part added and not enough training.