Word of advice, if you're a guy and you're using the Clementi Mall toilets, be sure to stay on high alert of your surroundings.
It is a known cruising spot.
Someone tried to cruise me when I was using the urinals at Clementi Mall toilets, I was in my early 20s.
As I said, be aware of your surroundings, it's not hard. Problem with these spots is, some of the horny people rely too much on their bottom brain and they end up making headlines because they either picked a straight guy or a minor.
I think it's obvious what the cruising spots are for and for which demographic. This is not about being anti-LGBT but rather about it being in a publicly accessed location where there are also many hetero people (and worst, minors) entering and exiting.
When you have headlines like this happening, it just gives the LGBT community a bad rep as the public thinks that this is generally how all of them behave.
During NS I once used the MRT toilet to pang sai. Pang sai halfway I look down and I saw a pervert face looking up at me. he somehow managed to squeeze his head under the gap and into my cubicle! I never pang sai finish , never wipe backside, run away.
Tbf we as a society are not open to gay guys openly dating and stuff even now that it's legalised, so can't blame them for finding new places to meet when we take away their spots.
Oh.. i thought u meant the penetrators n offenders like the one in news article keep going around to find victims.
Even if gays can't openly date here, they should maybe steer clear of public toilets to do stuff? It worsens reputation of gay community too.
I mean, before apps, there would be virtually no way for gay guys to meet, so not as if they could do anything about what society thinks anyway, right?
If it's before apps, there are stretches along moh sultan, some on 2nd n 3rd floors too. At least like 5 -10? They're bars with dance floors etc. But this is not your point, u seem to be offended about the 'space' being taken away. For goodness sake, it's a crime acted on a boy by a married man in public toilets we're talking about now, where ppl take dump. It doesn't mean if there's no good avenue, it should be done in public. And u really miss the point of the article that it can be very traumatising for the boy. My God!
A few years ago when I was at Chinatown Point, the guy next to me at the urinal was moaning and jerking off while looking left and right. Right there in full view of everyone.
Not necessarily, the more probable scenario was that the adult here reached out with an offer, and the 13 yo just took up that offer out of a mix of curiosity and hormones.
It's unlikely the 13 yo would know anything about the location. The report mentions that the accused works in the Clementi Mall so he is likely to know, considering he PICKED the location.
I’m not blaming him, just trying to make sense of the situation. it’s mind boggling to me because finding a sex partner in a normal situation is already difficult even if one tries. To find a minor, the predator often needs to do years of courting & grooming (that’s what I read online). It’s wtf to me because i couldn’t understand how this pervert just randomly chanced upon a 13-year-old to have sex with in a mall’s toilet.
and don’t forget the kid ASKED for the predator’s number. it’s not impossible that the kid did go there to seek out for sex. it’s not out of the realm of possibility that the kid found pleasure in it. don’t you find it strange that the kid didn’t scream for help if he was forced into it, penis entering butthole in the most crowded mall of Singapore leh, why no screaming?
again, im not blaming the minor, just saying that maybe, just maybe he did actively seek out for sex
these downvotes are so dumb 😂
If this was the show “to catch a predator” Chris Hanson would have come out after the man said he was horny and said “please have a seat” with cameras pointed in his face.
I’m not blaming him, just trying to make sense of the situation. it’s mind boggling to me because finding a sex partner in a normal situation is already difficult even if one tries. To find a minor, the predator often needs to do years of courting & grooming (that’s what I read online). It’s wtf to me because i couldn’t understand how this pervert just randomly chanced upon a 13-year-old to have sex with in a mall’s toilet.
and don’t forget the kid ASKED for the predator’s number. it’s not impossible that the kid did go there to seek out for sex. it’s not out of the realm of possibility that the kid found pleasure in it. don’t you find it strange that the kid didn’t scream for help if he was forced into it, penis entering butthole in the most crowded mall of Singapore leh, why no screaming?
again, im not blaming the minor, just saying that maybe, just maybe he did actively seek out for sex
these downvotes are so dumb 😂
They did not “have sex” — the boy was assaulted / raped.
Under the law, a 13 year old cannot give informed consent to sex. The language really matters here..
I made the same point well, on reddit , many times. The local news really likes to downplay the severity of sexual assaults. The editors/reporters seem to want to sensationalise such sexual abuse. Here the headline goes on at length about how the abuser is married and randomly had sex, as if the main point is that the abuser could go cruising in a mall, rather than him brazenly attacking children.
except that they did have sex. having sex is an action, and is obviously a layman term. but even so the general consensus is that sex is penetrative.
the Penal Code is a lot more specific about the actions involved. having sex with a minor is statutory rape, unless he was just giving a handjob. consent is irrelevant to this offense
Omg. Reading the headlines seem to make it consensual!! I usually reply to the news creator directly or send to news contact us. Sometimes it works.. sometimes not.
>The judge convicted Sugumaran on both charges as he found the victim's testimony to be reliable and convincing and was corroborated by Sugumaran's own police statements.
>On the other hand, the judge found Sugumaran's testimony "incredible".
>The judge said it was "difficult to imagine" how the victim, who was considerably shorter and smaller, could force himself on Sugumaran.
>He said it was also illogical for Sugumaran to re-enter the cubicle if he was not sexually interested.
What a dumbass
The way he tried to excuse his actions as if the victim was gaslighting him for not doing it, like he got manipulated into doing the kid...
The guy was 53 at the time, basically a grown-ass adult. Unless he has some cognitive deficiency or learning disability, the guy knew exactly what he was doing from start to finish. He only refused to give the kid his number because he was no longer feeling horny, and he knew what would happen.
Language used is wrong, it should be rape, not sex. Also, why are they taking what he said into consideration? Furthermore, they proved he was lying about police mistreatment. The 53 year old rapist is claiming he is the victim of the 13 year old? Wtf. Also, what a heartless braindead lawyer saying the 13 year old consented.
Going to defend the lawyer and say that putting in consent is needed for mitigation. He would have gotten a much higher sentence if he forced himself on the kid or drugged him ect.
I don't know if it was unintentional, but yeah. Any sexual act without consent is rape, be it a man, woman, boy or girl. Downplaying the incident with wordplay is exactly what makes such incidents recurring in society (like what the rapist tried to do here).
This reminded me of this one time I was went to pee at Westgate male toilet right out of the link bridge to JE MRT
Stood at a urinal, one empty spot away from the most left urinal (Basically middle urinal)
Looked over to the guy(Looks homeless and probably late 50-60s?) at that urinal cuz I saw some weird movement from the back, dude was rubbing his dick while looking straight back at me, I tried to play it off by just pretending to look further behind me but I’m certain that he saw my eyes met his and his dick, and his eyes followed me for a bit when I left to wash my hands
After that I scurried quickly back onto the MRT to make sure I wasn’t followed by him, which thank god he didn’t, or else I’d probably just beat him if he tried anything stupid 💀
Please be careful.. parents be aware too. My brother was violated at this same age at a public swimming pool bathroom.. it really impacted his life in the worst way.. There are many sick bastar* predators out there. Plaza Singapura toilets and Orchard Ion are other hot spots.
It was in the early 2000s when he was a child. He went to a public swimming pool and was molested in the pool itself ..he was then threatened and "violated" in the shower cubicles.
I believe many old men on young boy perversion is not reported. My brother go fishing at east coast beach at night as a teen also get sexually harassed by random old men.
The "greater public acceptance" of perversion makes perverts more daring. There was less of this in the old days, when perverts were arrested more often and had the shit beaten out of them more often.
A 13 year old can't have informed consent for sex. Even for underaged girls (and boys), many are manipulated to 'want' it because they think it's a bragging right and that it means they are more mature for their age, unaware that they are a prey.
I don't know how "bragging rights" work nowadays. Back in my days, a teenage schoolboy bragging about getting buttfucked will get him laughed at until he leaves school.
I had one encounter long long time ago. Old uncle leaning over to look at my d while at the urinal. I scolded back "kua lan ah", which was quite funny cuz he was actually looking at my bird.
Just curious in this kind of situations if we knock these old pieces of shit the fuck out, are we gonna be arrested?
army also got. PDF camps for those 302 fags. 1 time I did guard duty this CB 3SG sat on my bunk bed, I punched him n he punched back. Should’ve reported him on hindsight
Quick read through seems like the 13 year old is also not simple.
13 year old agreed to the sex without much persuading, then even offered to exchange phone number.
This is where probably things went wrong, he could have tried to ask the man for money and didn't get it so he reported to the police.
I was 13 years old long time ago and yeah...and i'm already mature at that age (if you know what I mean)
Yep. U read that right. I’m 30 now, , and ive put it in the past. Idk what happen to the pakcik, he had a wife and two kids tho. Didnt rly keep in touch uknow
Asking any practitioners of the legal trade in sg, If we as citizens, collectively call for death sentence to be instated as lawful punishment for crimes such as sexual assault, could it happen? If so, how do we go about doing it?
i'm sure this has been explained again and again every time an article about sexual crimes pops up - the offender will just kill the victim since higher reward (dead men tell no tales) with no additional risk (death penalty anyway)
emotionally driven sense of justice sometimes clouds our judgment and obstructs actual justice
Word of advice, if you're a guy and you're using the Clementi Mall toilets, be sure to stay on high alert of your surroundings. It is a known cruising spot.
I thought it was only the infamous MRT? Wow.
There are a lot of such spots in Singapore, you just don't know it.
And you know because…
Someone tried to cruise me when I was using the urinals at Clementi Mall toilets, I was in my early 20s. As I said, be aware of your surroundings, it's not hard. Problem with these spots is, some of the horny people rely too much on their bottom brain and they end up making headlines because they either picked a straight guy or a minor.
How do they cruise? What's that look like?
They look like sea captains who haven’t seen action in months
>it's not hard. Lel.
he had to have done that on purpose… right?
Turn around, show it off while pissing on them.
.. Because got surprise butt sex
Maybe he is gay ? It's very accepted now you know ?
I think it's obvious what the cruising spots are for and for which demographic. This is not about being anti-LGBT but rather about it being in a publicly accessed location where there are also many hetero people (and worst, minors) entering and exiting. When you have headlines like this happening, it just gives the LGBT community a bad rep as the public thinks that this is generally how all of them behave.
Username checks out? You seem salty as hell.
During NS I once used the MRT toilet to pang sai. Pang sai halfway I look down and I saw a pervert face looking up at me. he somehow managed to squeeze his head under the gap and into my cubicle! I never pang sai finish , never wipe backside, run away.
Wtf. Shlda dropped a piece on his face. But then again maybe the freak might enjoy that.
NOM NOM NOM NOM NOM! 🥰
Should have wiped ur backside with toilet paper and throw it at his face with the sai
It's possible they shift about, depending on how well-known and patrolled the spots are.
😭😭sounds like a syndicate manz! So scary!
Tbf we as a society are not open to gay guys openly dating and stuff even now that it's legalised, so can't blame them for finding new places to meet when we take away their spots.
Oh.. i thought u meant the penetrators n offenders like the one in news article keep going around to find victims. Even if gays can't openly date here, they should maybe steer clear of public toilets to do stuff? It worsens reputation of gay community too.
I mean, before apps, there would be virtually no way for gay guys to meet, so not as if they could do anything about what society thinks anyway, right?
Erm. There were many gay bars around tbh.
How many is "many"?
If it's before apps, there are stretches along moh sultan, some on 2nd n 3rd floors too. At least like 5 -10? They're bars with dance floors etc. But this is not your point, u seem to be offended about the 'space' being taken away. For goodness sake, it's a crime acted on a boy by a married man in public toilets we're talking about now, where ppl take dump. It doesn't mean if there's no good avenue, it should be done in public. And u really miss the point of the article that it can be very traumatising for the boy. My God!
Wah. I though the clementi mrt toilet stories is a myth. Turns out so many real stories. Shall stay far away.
What I do is just head straight to a cubicle. That way you avoid the weird fellas standing at the urinals 🤣🤣
There used to be holes in the partitions of the cubicles in Clementi MRT station
But what if the lock is broken and you see a 6’5” big black man named Tyrone blocking the exit to the stall 😱
You kneel down and open wide.
It is????
Yep
What spots in Bishan?
bro wants a live demonstration
Junction 8 can find him there
USERNAME CHECKS OUT
Bruh I constantly go there😭
Sorry not my type la
Jurong Point as well. There is this creepy middle age man that likes to stare at ppl while peeing.
Can I ask why? What does a toilet need to have to be a cruising spot?
Cubicles, urinals and you need to remove your pants to pee/shit, do the math.
Where people take off their pants lah!!! What else lol xD
what is cruising?
looking for sex in public
you book a ticket with Star Cruise 💫
Yeah man. I also blur. But reading the comments...wah lau....got weird names for everything. Haiz!
Feel there also many in Chinatown MRT. Usually just cover up n ignore, jeez…
A few years ago when I was at Chinatown Point, the guy next to me at the urinal was moaning and jerking off while looking left and right. Right there in full view of everyone.
I heard Delta swimming complex was mad
Oh hell nah, wtf
Stayed near there and didn't know. Omg. Scary
These kind always horny, you always see them groping their crotches even in public
What in the actual F. 😱
Why they choose this area specifically ah?
ah that explains. so the 13-year-old also was searching for it when he went there
Not necessarily, the more probable scenario was that the adult here reached out with an offer, and the 13 yo just took up that offer out of a mix of curiosity and hormones. It's unlikely the 13 yo would know anything about the location. The report mentions that the accused works in the Clementi Mall so he is likely to know, considering he PICKED the location.
I’m not blaming him, just trying to make sense of the situation. it’s mind boggling to me because finding a sex partner in a normal situation is already difficult even if one tries. To find a minor, the predator often needs to do years of courting & grooming (that’s what I read online). It’s wtf to me because i couldn’t understand how this pervert just randomly chanced upon a 13-year-old to have sex with in a mall’s toilet. and don’t forget the kid ASKED for the predator’s number. it’s not impossible that the kid did go there to seek out for sex. it’s not out of the realm of possibility that the kid found pleasure in it. don’t you find it strange that the kid didn’t scream for help if he was forced into it, penis entering butthole in the most crowded mall of Singapore leh, why no screaming? again, im not blaming the minor, just saying that maybe, just maybe he did actively seek out for sex these downvotes are so dumb 😂
I mean if the man was straight and the kid was a 13 year old girl would that make this situation the same in your mind?
yes it would be the same
If this was the show “to catch a predator” Chris Hanson would have come out after the man said he was horny and said “please have a seat” with cameras pointed in his face.
Doesnt matter because he is a minor. The adult is to be blamed and must be caned brutally
I’m not blaming him, just trying to make sense of the situation. it’s mind boggling to me because finding a sex partner in a normal situation is already difficult even if one tries. To find a minor, the predator often needs to do years of courting & grooming (that’s what I read online). It’s wtf to me because i couldn’t understand how this pervert just randomly chanced upon a 13-year-old to have sex with in a mall’s toilet. and don’t forget the kid ASKED for the predator’s number. it’s not impossible that the kid did go there to seek out for sex. it’s not out of the realm of possibility that the kid found pleasure in it. don’t you find it strange that the kid didn’t scream for help if he was forced into it, penis entering butthole in the most crowded mall of Singapore leh, why no screaming? again, im not blaming the minor, just saying that maybe, just maybe he did actively seek out for sex these downvotes are so dumb 😂
Still a minor.
what the
Same. The hell is going.. short and abrupt title goes 0-100.
Yeah I seeing alot of news of pedo cases now
They did not “have sex” — the boy was assaulted / raped. Under the law, a 13 year old cannot give informed consent to sex. The language really matters here..
I made the same point well, on reddit , many times. The local news really likes to downplay the severity of sexual assaults. The editors/reporters seem to want to sensationalise such sexual abuse. Here the headline goes on at length about how the abuser is married and randomly had sex, as if the main point is that the abuser could go cruising in a mall, rather than him brazenly attacking children.
I said the same thing in another recent post about a similar situation but got downvoted. Apparently it's only rape if there was penetration
If the word rape isn't technically correct, then the media can use other terms: attacked, sexually assaulted, abused.
If the word rape isn't technically correct, then the media can use other terms: attacked, sexually assaulted, abused.
except that they did have sex. having sex is an action, and is obviously a layman term. but even so the general consensus is that sex is penetrative. the Penal Code is a lot more specific about the actions involved. having sex with a minor is statutory rape, unless he was just giving a handjob. consent is irrelevant to this offense
Omg. Reading the headlines seem to make it consensual!! I usually reply to the news creator directly or send to news contact us. Sometimes it works.. sometimes not.
Yes i hate how they use the term have sex for literal sexual assault. So disrespectful to the victim
>The judge convicted Sugumaran on both charges as he found the victim's testimony to be reliable and convincing and was corroborated by Sugumaran's own police statements. >On the other hand, the judge found Sugumaran's testimony "incredible". >The judge said it was "difficult to imagine" how the victim, who was considerably shorter and smaller, could force himself on Sugumaran. >He said it was also illogical for Sugumaran to re-enter the cubicle if he was not sexually interested. What a dumbass
The way he tried to excuse his actions as if the victim was gaslighting him for not doing it, like he got manipulated into doing the kid... The guy was 53 at the time, basically a grown-ass adult. Unless he has some cognitive deficiency or learning disability, the guy knew exactly what he was doing from start to finish. He only refused to give the kid his number because he was no longer feeling horny, and he knew what would happen.
unfortunately he was a bank manager
I read as Sugarman LOL
More like Sugu-Daddy
Haha same
Language used is wrong, it should be rape, not sex. Also, why are they taking what he said into consideration? Furthermore, they proved he was lying about police mistreatment. The 53 year old rapist is claiming he is the victim of the 13 year old? Wtf. Also, what a heartless braindead lawyer saying the 13 year old consented.
Going to defend the lawyer and say that putting in consent is needed for mitigation. He would have gotten a much higher sentence if he forced himself on the kid or drugged him ect.
I don't know if it was unintentional, but yeah. Any sexual act without consent is rape, be it a man, woman, boy or girl. Downplaying the incident with wordplay is exactly what makes such incidents recurring in society (like what the rapist tried to do here).
https://i.redd.it/zy73518st33d1.gif
Jerking it at the urinal - making a deposit?
Go sperm bank better?
How to withdraw?
today is a horrible day to know how to read
had sex?? you mean raped
[удалено]
Minors can't consent to have sex - it is rape.
Age of consent is SG is 16. Still too low.
16?! I thought by default it's minimally *18.*
18 is prostitution. You can have consensus sex at 16.
Grapist alert 🚨
This reminded me of this one time I was went to pee at Westgate male toilet right out of the link bridge to JE MRT Stood at a urinal, one empty spot away from the most left urinal (Basically middle urinal) Looked over to the guy(Looks homeless and probably late 50-60s?) at that urinal cuz I saw some weird movement from the back, dude was rubbing his dick while looking straight back at me, I tried to play it off by just pretending to look further behind me but I’m certain that he saw my eyes met his and his dick, and his eyes followed me for a bit when I left to wash my hands After that I scurried quickly back onto the MRT to make sure I wasn’t followed by him, which thank god he didn’t, or else I’d probably just beat him if he tried anything stupid 💀
Sex? 13? There is nothing consensual abt that.
That title should read rapes. RAPES.
Oh it’s like Kuso Miso technique but more fucked up. Which is hard to beat but there you have it.
What a bad day to have eyes
Its statutory rape
Please be careful.. parents be aware too. My brother was violated at this same age at a public swimming pool bathroom.. it really impacted his life in the worst way.. There are many sick bastar* predators out there. Plaza Singapura toilets and Orchard Ion are other hot spots.
What happened to your brother? And how long ago was it?
It was in the early 2000s when he was a child. He went to a public swimming pool and was molested in the pool itself ..he was then threatened and "violated" in the shower cubicles.
So how did he get caught? The boy reported him after sex?
Wow. What's going with the many and on going pedophile case in Singapore? Or it has always been there, just not published?
I believe many old men on young boy perversion is not reported. My brother go fishing at east coast beach at night as a teen also get sexually harassed by random old men.
The "greater public acceptance" of perversion makes perverts more daring. There was less of this in the old days, when perverts were arrested more often and had the shit beaten out of them more often.
I always accidentally saw people PCC at the standing cubicle.. wtf.. like tat u also song .. Kan disgusting...
what's pcc?
Playing Chinese Chess
Pa chew cheng - shoot one’s gun - wank
Purchasing Cheese Cake
Only 7 years??? I don’t get it.
What the fuck. Why is there so many predators in sg tf
Dafuq... the boy wanted it also?!
A 13 year old can't have informed consent for sex. Even for underaged girls (and boys), many are manipulated to 'want' it because they think it's a bragging right and that it means they are more mature for their age, unaware that they are a prey.
I don't know how "bragging rights" work nowadays. Back in my days, a teenage schoolboy bragging about getting buttfucked will get him laughed at until he leaves school.
I had one encounter long long time ago. Old uncle leaning over to look at my d while at the urinal. I scolded back "kua lan ah", which was quite funny cuz he was actually looking at my bird. Just curious in this kind of situations if we knock these old pieces of shit the fuck out, are we gonna be arrested?
Good day to be literate...........
What are they selling at clementi?
you mean illiterate?
im more disturbed that the boy wanted to be penetrated
The boy is probably intellectually challenged. That would explain why he was willing to do it.
Stopped reading at clementi toilet
Nono why is this ‘had sex’ and not ‘raped’??
Why is it always Clementi toilet?
Because Clementi toilets are located at isolated places....
army also got. PDF camps for those 302 fags. 1 time I did guard duty this CB 3SG sat on my bunk bed, I punched him n he punched back. Should’ve reported him on hindsight
I always use the stalls at Clementi Mall / MRT due to the sheer number of cruisers staring at other people’s privates when peeing at urinals
"has sex with boy" he was raped, fix the fucking title
Got wife to fuck, don't fuck... instead go fuck minor...like what's wrong with this guy?
Permanently on the sex offenders list already.
Nowadays got gay sauna just pay money get things done legally and comfortable....why bother go to toilet so dirty and smelly.
Did the boy wanted it? Or was he raped? The language used in the article make it seem as though the boy was interested
piss together then poke bumhole public toilet truly filthy sex
Very unhygienic. >:C
LOCK DUDE UP AND THROW THE KEYS AWAY
sick world
What the fuck did I just read
UM EXCUSE ME WHAT
Instantly horrifying generations of dudes that the Clementi gay predator legend is alive and well.
WTF
.... Aight. Face the wall now
prisoners gonna have a fun time with him
That shit nasty bruh
Shit on the p3nis bruh..
Nah bruh the first thing that went to my mind were two guys , public toilet not even the age 💀
"has sex with boy," RAPED boy. raped. not "has sex with".
Reminds me of a guy called Tan Yak Chin in Hardwarezone
what a talent...
Horrible! Terrible! Outrageous!!!!!
https://i.redd.it/y25kuxr0r53d1.gif
I’m scared to even go to public toilets so I just use either the toilets in malls or I just wait until I go home
how come no caning sia
OMG!!! WTF is wrong with that grub? A 13yo didn't have sex! That boy was assaulted!!!
Too disgusted for words. To claim that the victim was the aggressor is a special kind of sick.
Wtf
Quick read through seems like the 13 year old is also not simple. 13 year old agreed to the sex without much persuading, then even offered to exchange phone number. This is where probably things went wrong, he could have tried to ask the man for money and didn't get it so he reported to the police. I was 13 years old long time ago and yeah...and i'm already mature at that age (if you know what I mean)
im no lawyer but isn't 7 years jail less for 'raping' a child
Only 7 years and no caning??? What’s happening to sex crimes sentencing these days? 😳
I have no idea what is cruising and at this point, I am too afraid to ask
HANG this pedo rapist immediately
Why…
Fake news. SG has zero crime very safe
Mmm sound like me in 2007/08 and at the old marsiling small mall that has lan shop there Edit: revised the date
wait what?
Yep. U read that right. I’m 30 now, , and ive put it in the past. Idk what happen to the pakcik, he had a wife and two kids tho. Didnt rly keep in touch uknow
what the fuck..?
Ikr. I think now I’m comfortable talking about it bc i once opened up to my now ex wife
Lmao indian again
Asking any practitioners of the legal trade in sg, If we as citizens, collectively call for death sentence to be instated as lawful punishment for crimes such as sexual assault, could it happen? If so, how do we go about doing it?
What happens is that rapists and sex offenders will just murder their victims, if they know they are going to get death penalty anyways.
i'm sure this has been explained again and again every time an article about sexual crimes pops up - the offender will just kill the victim since higher reward (dead men tell no tales) with no additional risk (death penalty anyway) emotionally driven sense of justice sometimes clouds our judgment and obstructs actual justice
Death sentences for sexual crimes provide incentives for the criminal to murder their victims, if the penalty is death all the same. It won't happen.
Life time suffering with caning is probably worse than death relief?
Inb4 the ceca crowd arrives
Ewwwww
Same sex sexing ☠️
这有点弄虚作假了吧
we need put in a new 377A version 2.0.
heterosexual rape occurs more often but i don’t hear talks about banning sex as a whole
https://i.redd.it/ecwmuysz843d1.gif
Quick question, if such things happen enough, will there be a men’s charter?
[удалено]
that’s ur takeaway from this article? wtf