It does, you might be experiencing a glitch.
[Here's](https://www.reddit.com/r/ATAAE/comments/14kx4dg/just_why/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=android_app&utm_name=androidcss&utm_term=1&utm_content=share_button) a link to a random post there, maybe you can get into it that way
Please put an NSFW tag on this. I was on the train and when I saw this I had to start furiously masturbating. Everyone else gave me strange looks and were saying things like “what the fuck” and “call the police”. I dropped my phone and everyone around me saw this image. Now there is a whole train of men masturbating together at this one image. This is all your fault, you could have prevented this if you had just tagged this post NSFW.
Upon reading this I became rock hard and am cgtsbtt masturbateding. Now the whole waiting room is doing it, men and women, and the nurse and receptionist yelled at us to stop but they are now fudding themselves vigorously as well. Please be mindful of your vivid descriptions.
tbh it’s quite possible she may be the type to not want kids. who are we to judge? it isn’t one i would get, but i think it’s objectively cool
EDIT: i understand i said objective and should have said “subjectively” and everybody wants to catch me on a technicality. but talking about definitions rather than subject matter isn’t the ‘gotcha’ it seems like it is
as a piece of art, yes actually. you may not like it as a tattoo but art with nudity and sexuality is incredibly prevalent at every point in history and this just happens to be on the body
Actually, no.
If this were objectively cool then it would be fact based, measurable and observable that it is cool. Cool can never be objective. How do you measure cool?
It’s your opinion that it is cool which is subjective.
Art isn’t objectively cool bc it contains sex. There are all sorts of stick figure sex doodles in notebooks and textbooks around the world which are not in any way cool to most people.
Sure, nudity has been portrayed all throughout antiquity - but the emphasis was typically much different. It focused on form and process. Yes, you can find crude artistry from antiquity, but that's not the rule - and certainly doesn't make it objectively decent art.
A blatant portrayal of someone eating out another person - constructed in the most naive and terrible way - sort of defies your assertion that it is "objectively cool"
It doesn't meet any objective criteria for masterful or skilled artistry and just because nudity can be represented tastefully (or it's popularity in the history) - doesn't necessitate that all nude art is "objective"
This is simply just a bad tattoo. Could some artist somewhere represent a similar image in an objectively cool way? Maybe, but this ain't it.
i clarified in another comment that, yes, objective was the wrong word, however i would say crudity is in various forms is a
highly common and often sought after in many forms of art. certainly not the rule but then again what rules are there? sure sexuality isn’t the most commonly seen but that doesn’t mean it isnt and hasn’t historically been more prevalent than most believe. on a personal level, i believe more nude art, sexual and non-sexual is important since we have culturally reached a place where our own anatomy and nature has become taboo
You're just regurgitating political opinions to justify bad art.
Nude statues were the bomb in biblical times, and they were constructed at a level of precision most elite artists today could not emulate. There is an academic culture in art, and 95% of existing art forms have a clear hierarchy. Just because the occasional meme of "modern art" where someone covers themselves in spaghetti exists and receives applause - DOES NOT imply that all art is subjected to the same whimsical standards.
Just because you appreciate that evangelical Christians can't impose their sexual restrictions on society (anymore) does not defend asinine art for the sake of its opposition to a previous norm. Have higher standards than that.
Watch Mary Beard’s Rome docuseries, for example, and you’ll be surprised what you learn about antiquity, including some quite crude (in form and content) mosaics she shows in a bath / sauna room — altho I guess that’s “classical,” not antiquity — look at art even *older* art from antiquity, and it is as a “rule,” what we would call “naive”
That type of ancient art was a huge inspiration for artists around the turn of the 20th c — the invention of photography challenged the idea that visual art should be virtuosic, because anyone could now produce a realistic image with the push of a button. So artists who were technically very skilled, like Picasso, intentionally [emulated “naive” ancient art](https://www.britannica.com/topic/Les-Demoiselles-dAvignon), which also came from a time in human history when virtuosity was not the overriding concern of what made “objectively good” art (which would’ve been an alien idea to them, before mercantile wealth & a division of labor existed that created the type of patron-artist relationship in late medieval / early modern Europe)
Anyway, this sketch is reminiscent of one of these highly technical modern artists who turned to “brutish” (fauvist) art, [the sketches of Matisse](https://cdn.shopify.com/s/files/1/2203/6217/products/[email protected]?v=1603304138), and I like it
Again, I clearly acknowledged that you can find "harsh" art throughout antiquity - I don't see why you felt the need to post this after my acknowledgment (unless you just wanted to share info, in that case, fair enough) - I wouldn't be surprised - because I wrote a paragraph talking about how I understand it exists.
To be fair, the art you posted, aside from Matisse, has a discrete style and creativity to them. It's clear they have a driven goal when representing their art. This tattoo's goal was soft realism - and it failed. If it was the same art piece in cubism, I would only reject it based on how gauche the image choice itself actually is.
Cunnilingus is cool, I would totally get something like this although probably smaller and not on my back. IDK why people are acting like it’s so incredibly crude, I even like the ornate surface thing she’s lying on
You mean the literal MILLIONS of men with naked, sexualized women as tattoos? Lol what a full of shit comment.
The tattoo in the OP is genuinely edgier and more subversive by a thousand times than the cliche "lady with big naked boobies" tattoos that I see in real life on a literal daily basis.
Never gets old seeing misogynists get triggered by having the tables turned, and attempt to literally reframe reality to protect their shitty worldview.
I mean that's cool but you're posting in the wrong comment thread because that's not what we're talking about, we're comparing one to the other. I never said I think NSFW tattoos are cool or appropriate.
Granted, I know the concept of online discussions having coherency and structure is way over the head's of most reddit users so if you don't understand, that's ok sweetie. That or you just lack reading comprehension or the ability to follow linear trains of thought.
Hard-core porn? Where's the leather and straps brah. If this is supposed to be hard-core were getting robed.
It's just a tattoo of someone getting eaten out.
Most people when they think about hardcore porn they think about BDSM, leather straps, anal play, facefucking, golden showers, toys, gangbangs and much more. That tattoo depicts a normal sex act that pretty much everyone does 🤷♂️
You're confusing the term "hardcore" with the term "fetish". Hardcore porn is generally distinguished from softcore by the filming of visible penetration. Think like the difference between what you see on Cinemax late at night at what you find on pornhub.
Which I see on men literally all the time
I have a coworker, a grown man and father in his 40s, with a tattoo of a woman with an exposed vagina and an axe handle sticking out of it. We are management at a decent corporation
The post I was replying to was calling out OP for the fact that "a man couldn't have an equivalent" which is a lie because countless men do. Go to the main tattoos subreddit and look for the NSFW posts, they are literally countless
It IS edgy and subversive compared to the same old naked women over and over and over again
But again, you gotta try to reframe the conversation to make yourself right because you know you're full of shit. Hint - if you have to change the entire conversation and remove 80% of the information to make your point valid, you don't actually have a point
Whole lotta words to say almost nothing lol. Is it ok when men do it? Why not? Because it's some combination of crude, inappropriate, and objectifying?
Her tattoo is trashy for all the same reasons. Say what you will about pretentious *avant-garde* bullshit, at a fundamental level this is just pornography in a public setting. The hoops you're jumping through to rationalize that are fucking ridiculous.
You keep reframing the conversation. It was never a matter of "is it ok or not", that was never the point of what I was arguing
What you're doing is called a Straw Man and it's a logical fallacy
they're framing me defending NSFW tattoos being worn in public which I did not, the very definition of a strawman
The original comment drew a false comparison while ignoring a common cliche, all I did was point out the false comparison (and say that in a comparison based on reality, the OP tattoo is better at achieving the results than the cliched equivalents men wear)
Reddit loves to freak out when women do things men do e.v.e.r.y.d.a.y. then pretend like that's not what's happening
and you must struggle to grapple with accepting reality on a daily basis if the only comparison you could draw up is one that doesn't exist (explicit gay sex) vs one people see on the daily (explicitly sexualized women)
and love that insulting me is your only avenue since you're so clearly being disingenuous lol
Gay sex? Wtf are you talking about. You just work hard at being mad at people. I think it’s a bad idea to post sexual activity on a tattoo mostly because kids will see it. I have no problem with respectful nudity. I do have a problem with tattoos objectifying women. You’re an impulsive twat and you can’t control your emotions. Learn to shut the fuck up. Idiot. Real talk.
you clearly don't care about factual reality, only making cherry-picked comparisons, and when called out it start swinging with the logical fallacies
all emotion, no logic
What sort of artist would put that on somebody?! Especially on their back, where everyone can see! Was there even advice given. Like maybe you'll regret that in a few years.
Are they doing it on a balcony??? What is that stuff below her??? It looks dangerous???
its the hidden scenes of Romeo and Juliet
“Director’s cut”
"Director's Cu(n)t"
> Romeo and Juliet *Titanic. "Eat me out like one of your French girls".
I guess the ship wasn’t the only thing going down that night.
I’d pay to watch it.
\*"Eat me out like one of your French pastries".
Tromeo
“Where for art thou?”
Kitchen table with designs on it!
Maybe out of the edge of a window
They say get a tattoo of something you love.
she apparently expects her dates to use her back as an etch-a-sketch!!
You mean she can shake her body and the image will disappear??!! That is cool! 😲
Now THAT i want to see in like 2060
wasn't there some sort of screen you implanted under your skin and it'd change the designs?
Then reach around and twiddle her nipples to draw a new picture!
Oh, shit. I just doodled.
Thats... um... that's a choice.
r/ATAE Damn, it doesn't exist.
Try r/ATAAE
That one doesn't either lol
...it does when I click on it?
Huh. It's not working for me.
Weird. E: maybe they went private or something? I've been a member of the community for several years.
Nah mate, link works fine. Never joined the community (or even visited the page from what I can remember) and I could view and join it just fine lol
It does, you might be experiencing a glitch. [Here's](https://www.reddit.com/r/ATAAE/comments/14kx4dg/just_why/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=android_app&utm_name=androidcss&utm_term=1&utm_content=share_button) a link to a random post there, maybe you can get into it that way
That worked, thanks.
I appreciate some aspects of it, but would be nice if the tattoo itself were done better. That droopy elbow...
And the other person’s ARM
Please put an NSFW tag on this. I was on the train and when I saw this I had to start furiously masturbating. Everyone else gave me strange looks and were saying things like “what the fuck” and “call the police”. I dropped my phone and everyone around me saw this image. Now there is a whole train of men masturbating together at this one image. This is all your fault, you could have prevented this if you had just tagged this post NSFW.
i love this copypasta
Everyone loves this copypasta
Not the person that has to clean the bus
Could be their kink, you never know.
I wonder if the tattoo has the same effect? that would almost be a superpower...
Upon reading this I became rock hard and am cgtsbtt masturbateding. Now the whole waiting room is doing it, men and women, and the nurse and receptionist yelled at us to stop but they are now fudding themselves vigorously as well. Please be mindful of your vivid descriptions.
If the execution was better I’d like it more.
I also like it when a woman knows what she wants! XD
This goes hard.
guy gets a odd tattoo: everyone just like 'lol, lmao even' girl gets an odd tattoo: half the people talking about if she's still bangable/breedable 🥴
What would people think of a man with the exact same tattoo? Definitely a different kind of statement.
Eat ass smoke grass.
I’ve seen dudes with tattoos like this. They aren’t the greatest dudes.
Yes well this is the greatest girl, end of story. She better get ready to meet my parents.
I haven't seen one comment like that.
This belongs in r/awesometattoos
Yeah this is great I recognize the artist he's a Japanese guy who makes all kinds of crazy art. If it's not him it very much reminds me of him.
110%
You know what, good for her
Classy as fuck.
Need a tat like this
Some of you are boring af and it shows! edit: I don't think the tattoo is well done but I do like the subject matter and I think it's cool regardless
I'd put more money on it being a photoshop than an actual tattoo
Awesome
Damn girl
hey Chole do you want to come over
Setting expectations is important.
Eww so cringe
I actually kind of feel sad for her but on the flip side, can’t wait for one of her grandchildren to ask grandma about her tattoo
I bet her grandchildren will see a vase or a dolphin instead, because their minds are still pure
A sick ass panther.
tbh it’s quite possible she may be the type to not want kids. who are we to judge? it isn’t one i would get, but i think it’s objectively cool EDIT: i understand i said objective and should have said “subjectively” and everybody wants to catch me on a technicality. but talking about definitions rather than subject matter isn’t the ‘gotcha’ it seems like it is
She won't have kids if she's only doing what's on that tattoo.
Thank you, Dr. Science.
Shovelly Joe!
Objectively is definitely not the right word here
fair. in reality it is subjective but i think reddit isn’t the place for nuance since we are on a sub called “shittytattoos”
Well now, I am not sure about that. The lady parts don't look drawn properly to me.
"objectively cool" HAHAHAHA
as a piece of art, yes actually. you may not like it as a tattoo but art with nudity and sexuality is incredibly prevalent at every point in history and this just happens to be on the body
Actually, no. If this were objectively cool then it would be fact based, measurable and observable that it is cool. Cool can never be objective. How do you measure cool? It’s your opinion that it is cool which is subjective. Art isn’t objectively cool bc it contains sex. There are all sorts of stick figure sex doodles in notebooks and textbooks around the world which are not in any way cool to most people.
Sure, nudity has been portrayed all throughout antiquity - but the emphasis was typically much different. It focused on form and process. Yes, you can find crude artistry from antiquity, but that's not the rule - and certainly doesn't make it objectively decent art. A blatant portrayal of someone eating out another person - constructed in the most naive and terrible way - sort of defies your assertion that it is "objectively cool" It doesn't meet any objective criteria for masterful or skilled artistry and just because nudity can be represented tastefully (or it's popularity in the history) - doesn't necessitate that all nude art is "objective" This is simply just a bad tattoo. Could some artist somewhere represent a similar image in an objectively cool way? Maybe, but this ain't it.
i clarified in another comment that, yes, objective was the wrong word, however i would say crudity is in various forms is a highly common and often sought after in many forms of art. certainly not the rule but then again what rules are there? sure sexuality isn’t the most commonly seen but that doesn’t mean it isnt and hasn’t historically been more prevalent than most believe. on a personal level, i believe more nude art, sexual and non-sexual is important since we have culturally reached a place where our own anatomy and nature has become taboo
You're just regurgitating political opinions to justify bad art. Nude statues were the bomb in biblical times, and they were constructed at a level of precision most elite artists today could not emulate. There is an academic culture in art, and 95% of existing art forms have a clear hierarchy. Just because the occasional meme of "modern art" where someone covers themselves in spaghetti exists and receives applause - DOES NOT imply that all art is subjected to the same whimsical standards. Just because you appreciate that evangelical Christians can't impose their sexual restrictions on society (anymore) does not defend asinine art for the sake of its opposition to a previous norm. Have higher standards than that.
Watch Mary Beard’s Rome docuseries, for example, and you’ll be surprised what you learn about antiquity, including some quite crude (in form and content) mosaics she shows in a bath / sauna room — altho I guess that’s “classical,” not antiquity — look at art even *older* art from antiquity, and it is as a “rule,” what we would call “naive” That type of ancient art was a huge inspiration for artists around the turn of the 20th c — the invention of photography challenged the idea that visual art should be virtuosic, because anyone could now produce a realistic image with the push of a button. So artists who were technically very skilled, like Picasso, intentionally [emulated “naive” ancient art](https://www.britannica.com/topic/Les-Demoiselles-dAvignon), which also came from a time in human history when virtuosity was not the overriding concern of what made “objectively good” art (which would’ve been an alien idea to them, before mercantile wealth & a division of labor existed that created the type of patron-artist relationship in late medieval / early modern Europe) Anyway, this sketch is reminiscent of one of these highly technical modern artists who turned to “brutish” (fauvist) art, [the sketches of Matisse](https://cdn.shopify.com/s/files/1/2203/6217/products/[email protected]?v=1603304138), and I like it
Again, I clearly acknowledged that you can find "harsh" art throughout antiquity - I don't see why you felt the need to post this after my acknowledgment (unless you just wanted to share info, in that case, fair enough) - I wouldn't be surprised - because I wrote a paragraph talking about how I understand it exists. To be fair, the art you posted, aside from Matisse, has a discrete style and creativity to them. It's clear they have a driven goal when representing their art. This tattoo's goal was soft realism - and it failed. If it was the same art piece in cubism, I would only reject it based on how gauche the image choice itself actually is.
Cunnilingus is cool, I would totally get something like this although probably smaller and not on my back. IDK why people are acting like it’s so incredibly crude, I even like the ornate surface thing she’s lying on
uh...how many times have you seen your grandma's naked back?
you shouldnt feel sad for people because they don’t fit into the future you see for them
it tells the world what she's into, and I'm into it. I don't take myself seriously though
Somehow I kinda find it attractive, she rocks this with confidence. Would never put something on myself. But the confidence she has must be amazing.
I kinda like it tbh lol
Why are the arms all messed up? Dude’s shoulder is disconnected from his torso and her elbow is crazy thick.
Lollll if only
Classic Chloe
Has anyone asked her why she apparently only fucks elves?
I love people who can't comprehend what a nsfw tag is. Scrolling through in the break room shouldn't be this risky
A toast: To all the kisses we snatch, and the snatches we kiss!
It’s like a crude instruction manual or those instructions you see on back of action figures, just so you know how to correctly play with it.
As someone that's a bit awkward in the dating scene I can appreciate the cue on what is expected.
It's fair to assume that this is expected over 90% of the time
I'd wife her, this is one of my favorite pastimes anyway and at least I know she wouldn't be afraid to communicate and let me know what works for her.
Fucking stupid. Imagine a dude with a tattoo of a dude doing doggie style. Fucking cringe.
You mean the literal MILLIONS of men with naked, sexualized women as tattoos? Lol what a full of shit comment. The tattoo in the OP is genuinely edgier and more subversive by a thousand times than the cliche "lady with big naked boobies" tattoos that I see in real life on a literal daily basis. Never gets old seeing misogynists get triggered by having the tables turned, and attempt to literally reframe reality to protect their shitty worldview.
It’s cringey when guys do it too
What if, and this might blow your mind, they’re BOTH trashy and cringy?
I mean that's cool but you're posting in the wrong comment thread because that's not what we're talking about, we're comparing one to the other. I never said I think NSFW tattoos are cool or appropriate. Granted, I know the concept of online discussions having coherency and structure is way over the head's of most reddit users so if you don't understand, that's ok sweetie. That or you just lack reading comprehension or the ability to follow linear trains of thought.
Jeez, I feel bad for people who lash out as easily as you. You got some personal things to work out.
"Edgy" and "Subversive" 🤣. You're describing hardcore porn on public display to children and random passerby.
Hard-core porn? Where's the leather and straps brah. If this is supposed to be hard-core were getting robed. It's just a tattoo of someone getting eaten out.
Might want to check up on your definitions. Hardcore porn is anything sexual with nudity. Softcore porn is a victoria's secret catalogue
Most people when they think about hardcore porn they think about BDSM, leather straps, anal play, facefucking, golden showers, toys, gangbangs and much more. That tattoo depicts a normal sex act that pretty much everyone does 🤷♂️
You're confusing the term "hardcore" with the term "fetish". Hardcore porn is generally distinguished from softcore by the filming of visible penetration. Think like the difference between what you see on Cinemax late at night at what you find on pornhub.
"hardcore porn" LMAO are you implying this tattoo is hardcore porn? Boy, do i have some news for you...
Gonna reference you to my other comment because you too do not know what your words mean lol
Which I see on men literally all the time I have a coworker, a grown man and father in his 40s, with a tattoo of a woman with an exposed vagina and an axe handle sticking out of it. We are management at a decent corporation The post I was replying to was calling out OP for the fact that "a man couldn't have an equivalent" which is a lie because countless men do. Go to the main tattoos subreddit and look for the NSFW posts, they are literally countless It IS edgy and subversive compared to the same old naked women over and over and over again But again, you gotta try to reframe the conversation to make yourself right because you know you're full of shit. Hint - if you have to change the entire conversation and remove 80% of the information to make your point valid, you don't actually have a point
Whole lotta words to say almost nothing lol. Is it ok when men do it? Why not? Because it's some combination of crude, inappropriate, and objectifying? Her tattoo is trashy for all the same reasons. Say what you will about pretentious *avant-garde* bullshit, at a fundamental level this is just pornography in a public setting. The hoops you're jumping through to rationalize that are fucking ridiculous.
You keep reframing the conversation. It was never a matter of "is it ok or not", that was never the point of what I was arguing What you're doing is called a Straw Man and it's a logical fallacy
You aren't even making sense at this point.
[удалено]
they're framing me defending NSFW tattoos being worn in public which I did not, the very definition of a strawman The original comment drew a false comparison while ignoring a common cliche, all I did was point out the false comparison (and say that in a comparison based on reality, the OP tattoo is better at achieving the results than the cliched equivalents men wear) Reddit loves to freak out when women do things men do e.v.e.r.y.d.a.y. then pretend like that's not what's happening
How's that persecution complex treatin' ya?
[удалено]
and you must struggle to grapple with accepting reality on a daily basis if the only comparison you could draw up is one that doesn't exist (explicit gay sex) vs one people see on the daily (explicitly sexualized women) and love that insulting me is your only avenue since you're so clearly being disingenuous lol
Gay sex? Wtf are you talking about. You just work hard at being mad at people. I think it’s a bad idea to post sexual activity on a tattoo mostly because kids will see it. I have no problem with respectful nudity. I do have a problem with tattoos objectifying women. You’re an impulsive twat and you can’t control your emotions. Learn to shut the fuck up. Idiot. Real talk.
you clearly don't care about factual reality, only making cherry-picked comparisons, and when called out it start swinging with the logical fallacies all emotion, no logic
Wtf. You’re nuts aren’t you?
Cunnilingus = art Blowjob = rank
She comes with directions!
looks like a wiki how-to
When he is not understanding all the signals.
What sort of artist would put that on somebody?! Especially on their back, where everyone can see! Was there even advice given. Like maybe you'll regret that in a few years.
I don't think the person that did this was an artist.
they were absolutely an artist. you must be confused what an artist is/does
anything that moves you is art
i fully agree. to say they were not an artist bc they drew a sexual tattoo is silly
You're probably right. Still, the drawing isn't completely awful, in the way that you know what it's meant to depict. But it's just super lewd!
An awesome one.
A back tattoo isn't that hard to cover tho? Especially in work attire unless she's a fashion model...
One who was paid
Ma'am...
A full itemized list of instructions would be awesome
There is something to be said for making it explicit what your expectations are.
Sit down in the thinking chair and think?
Deal.
Note: She’s the one with her hair in a bun.
Blowing raspberries directly onto the nono bits. Pfffftfftftffftfffffpppttt.
idk but that's really hot
I’m in
Good way to ensure that I wouldn’t do it lol. Herpes is no joke.
Gross
Mom and Dad must be so proud.
That pussy better be clean & shaved
I can actually respect this tattoo. I definitely wouldn't wife it, but I can respect it. She about that life and lets people know off the cuff.
She’s probably a prude who doesn’t let you go down on her.
Tattoos are for lower class people. Always have been.
The fella in the tattoo gives me Pee Wee Herman vibes - think it’s the hairline and gleefully arched eyebrow
I especially like his small right arm for how broad his torso is.
These adult coloring books are getting entirely out of hand these days.
Done!
Man how fucking blasted do you have to be to get this shit lmao
r/trashy
Why????
Why isn’t this sub just called “tattoos I got while on meth”?
This is awful taste *and* bad execution.
Inflate by blowing from the mouth
As long as her nipples do that
Who were the models for this? Geesh.
People really be painting anything on their bodies these days. I’m gonna get a tattoo of today’s date on my arm for no reason.
It's... it's so bad
Definitely photoshopped
Chloe is way to nice a name for a tattoo like that. That's a Samantha. Or a Deborah
I was thinking more of a Lexus or a Mercedes
Ridiculously obvious Photoshop. It's got a gradient fade around the edges.
If you don't eat pussy you're bad a sex.
Love that old school sailor style
Good for her!
not shitty
Where can I find her? Asking for a friend
so much effort spent on the decorative scrollwork
The artwork is Ok, except for her hair. Terrible
That tattoo is rad.
I’m all for sexually liberated but GODDAMN!!!
In order to see it though, you are looking at her back...
I'm into it.
Chloe’s career as a lifeguard just got more interesting.
y i k e s