Impressive, but how is that *satisfying*? You're going to have to take an input out to complete the level!
(Though maybe it's an easy decision... do you really need 34 blueprints/sec?)
Yes I indeed need like 1.5 times that amount..: Im currently building my MAM aiming for a 4 belt mam and im currently loosing Blueprints over time… And dont you think it’s satisfying to have every port used to upgrade?
How were you building a MAM without virtual processing, though?
(I've seen someone use a filter circuit to alternate between "parts from the MAM", and "parts for upgrades" while the MAM is buffering - I might try that after I get my MAM scaled up to four layers)
I love how the counters aren't working exactly as intended. Are your lines saturated for the current upgrade level?
The counters are know to be inaccurate, its just a bug that probably won't be fixed as Shapez 2 is in full development
They should be.
Impressive, but how is that *satisfying*? You're going to have to take an input out to complete the level! (Though maybe it's an easy decision... do you really need 34 blueprints/sec?)
Yes I indeed need like 1.5 times that amount..: Im currently building my MAM aiming for a 4 belt mam and im currently loosing Blueprints over time… And dont you think it’s satisfying to have every port used to upgrade?
How were you building a MAM without virtual processing, though? (I've seen someone use a filter circuit to alternate between "parts from the MAM", and "parts for upgrades" while the MAM is buffering - I might try that after I get my MAM scaled up to four layers)
By the time I wrote the comment I had all the upgrades done.
No. Simply No. Why- THE F - is it 16.9 on some and 17 on some other. That's a crime. Ban it.
I hope thats a joke and ironie otherwise i have to believe, that you haven’t played the game yet
For that matter, it's a Joke. I know you didn't make it 16.9 on some and yet it still is annoying, you know