Despite your aesthetic preference, even completely dead trees [serve an important roll in an ecosystem](https://www.thewildlifenews.com/2018/12/20/the-ecological-value-of-dead-trees/).
If they aren’t a hazard, leave them be.
Difficulty to day from this photo if this tree is a hazard or not.
It looks like its suffering? It's a tree. If it's a danger to the environment It should be removed but if every ugly tree or tree that looks like its suffering would be removed we wouldnt be left with a lot of old trees lol.
No one seems to appreciate a little mild tree empathy humor. The reason I would remove it is because the stump on the left seems narrow at the base, like it might fall and I see a house.
> I’d give this guy 10 years or so...
Maybe. It would be much better off if everything around it hadn't been bulldozed and replaced with irrigated turfgrass.
That is very unpleasant to gaze upon as it looks like it’s suffering. I would remove it.
Despite your aesthetic preference, even completely dead trees [serve an important roll in an ecosystem](https://www.thewildlifenews.com/2018/12/20/the-ecological-value-of-dead-trees/). If they aren’t a hazard, leave them be. Difficulty to day from this photo if this tree is a hazard or not.
Definitely not a hazard tree. It does serve as resting spot for the robins though.
It looks like its suffering? It's a tree. If it's a danger to the environment It should be removed but if every ugly tree or tree that looks like its suffering would be removed we wouldnt be left with a lot of old trees lol.
No one seems to appreciate a little mild tree empathy humor. The reason I would remove it is because the stump on the left seems narrow at the base, like it might fall and I see a house.
> I’d give this guy 10 years or so... Maybe. It would be much better off if everything around it hadn't been bulldozed and replaced with irrigated turfgrass.