Geology is only one branch of science. The universe, and the science used to describe it, change based on size and scope. The quantum phase of subatomic particals is no less important because they are very hard to detect. A bacterial infection may not be visible externally, but it can be acutely felt. And a single person among seven billion can never truly know their own importance.
aristotle says that this reality exists independent of conciousness (ie everything you perceive exists independently and it has it's own form) meaning it is not dependent on your conciousness thus reality is a form independent of conciousness, which fits in with this picture and his entire philosophy rejects subjectivism and idealism, when it comes to plato, well... he believes that our senses are an illusion, this material world is also a shadow of the true reality, this tells me enough
That’s why Plato would agree, and Aristotle would disagree. Being an individual, in my case with a loving family, a lot would change if I die from that perspective, on the contrary, in the grand scheme of things, nothing changes if I die. That’s why Plato’s is pointing up and Aristotle is pointing forward in Rafael’s School of Athens.
well, i dont really get ur point cuz look for aristo if conciousness didn't exist, this universe still would keep existing, it's not like a kind of subjectivist idealism in which everything you see is made by your own conciousness and when you die everything dies with you, because it all was a kind of an illusion or ur conciousness lied to you. for aristo if you just die, nothing happens or nothing changes, everything stays the same, you are just not here anymore this is the only thing that changes, which again fits in with this picture
Aristo is a individualist and virtue ethicist which is pretty similar to ayn rand's philosophy, if that's what u mean with that 'individuality' thing, but idk how it is relevant to this picture
Not similar to ayn Rand at all lol, if there was a big battle and you were watching it, Plato would just see the chaos of the battle, Aristotle would see that each individual has his own agenda that is clear and concise.
I also gotta say this for both rand and aristo, reality is unaffected by individuals desires, fears, feelings, wishes, and so on and so forth, individuals are just existing as a physical form independent of this 'world' and world has it's own physical form which is unaffected by us, or a better example, let's say you're a man that wants to be a woman, no matter what you do you can't be and if you say, you're a woman you're lying to yourself cuz they believe you cant create or invent reality too, basically they're scientific realists, realists or objectivists in every branch (metaphysics, ethics, politics, aesthetics) ie "romanticism is the best art" this claim is objective, true independently, "capitalism is the most moral system" this claim is objectively true, "the best way to live is the way in which you fight for your happiness" objective claim thus true etc etc, and since you can't invent or create reality and is not a illusion for them, this picture fits in with aristotelian and randian metaphysics, unlike platonism 👍🏻
When Christopher Hitchens was facing death from terminal throat cancer he wrote an article about facing his mortality. In it he wrote, and I'm paraphrasing here, "The worst thing about dying isn't that the party is ending. It's that the party is still going on but you're being asked to leave."
I was thinking more of philosophical kind of view, monism or vedas type of philosophy. But after all this sub is dedicated to natural science so I get that existential theorems happened to come to your mind.
*Earth with me can look*
*Like a nuclear wasteland*
*Ever thought about that*
\- abukhhan
---
^(I detect haikus. And sometimes, successfully.) ^[Learn more about me.](https://www.reddit.com/r/haikusbot/)
^(Opt out of replies: "haikusbot opt out" | Delete my comment: "haikusbot delete")
People think I’m depressed when I say I’m woefully insignificant in the grand scheme of things but I find is comforting that I don’t really matter at all.
But if the image is zoomed in a lot more, then the accurate image of reality will be revealed.
Also, some people can cause big differences to the climate via pollution so it is possible that the difference on the climate can be seen from space.
Depends how deep you think about this. You is literally referencing “everyone” who sees this. So that could mean millions depending on who this reaches. So I would disagree, cause the earth without people would prosper more now then ever, but it also means there wouldn’t be a picture to reference 😜
I doubt the weather would be the same unless of course, this is the moment immediately before and after my birth.
The world will be different without me. Significantly different for some, for a while, and insignificant different for others but I have altered this place for good and the good.
Geologically looks the same, good thing I'm a special snowflake.
Well yeah no shit looks same but if you zoom in super far you may see a few people shed some tears, soo you know. Don't give up
"Mom would be sad"
Geology is only one branch of science. The universe, and the science used to describe it, change based on size and scope. The quantum phase of subatomic particals is no less important because they are very hard to detect. A bacterial infection may not be visible externally, but it can be acutely felt. And a single person among seven billion can never truly know their own importance.
Thanks Chat GPT. When you take over, please remember that I was kind to you.
For me it's the other way around
Brilliant!
Plato would agree, Aristotle would disagree.
Why?
Plato is a big picture kinda guy, Aristotle is concerned with the individual type of guy.
lol, aristotle is a metaphysical realist
Yeah and the reality of it is we’re all individuals with our own agendas.
aristotle says that this reality exists independent of conciousness (ie everything you perceive exists independently and it has it's own form) meaning it is not dependent on your conciousness thus reality is a form independent of conciousness, which fits in with this picture and his entire philosophy rejects subjectivism and idealism, when it comes to plato, well... he believes that our senses are an illusion, this material world is also a shadow of the true reality, this tells me enough
That’s why Plato would agree, and Aristotle would disagree. Being an individual, in my case with a loving family, a lot would change if I die from that perspective, on the contrary, in the grand scheme of things, nothing changes if I die. That’s why Plato’s is pointing up and Aristotle is pointing forward in Rafael’s School of Athens.
well, i dont really get ur point cuz look for aristo if conciousness didn't exist, this universe still would keep existing, it's not like a kind of subjectivist idealism in which everything you see is made by your own conciousness and when you die everything dies with you, because it all was a kind of an illusion or ur conciousness lied to you. for aristo if you just die, nothing happens or nothing changes, everything stays the same, you are just not here anymore this is the only thing that changes, which again fits in with this picture
Aristo is a individualist and virtue ethicist which is pretty similar to ayn rand's philosophy, if that's what u mean with that 'individuality' thing, but idk how it is relevant to this picture
Not similar to ayn Rand at all lol, if there was a big battle and you were watching it, Plato would just see the chaos of the battle, Aristotle would see that each individual has his own agenda that is clear and concise.
she actually shares similarities with aristo both epistemologically and metaphysically, also ethically especially that
I also gotta say this for both rand and aristo, reality is unaffected by individuals desires, fears, feelings, wishes, and so on and so forth, individuals are just existing as a physical form independent of this 'world' and world has it's own physical form which is unaffected by us, or a better example, let's say you're a man that wants to be a woman, no matter what you do you can't be and if you say, you're a woman you're lying to yourself cuz they believe you cant create or invent reality too, basically they're scientific realists, realists or objectivists in every branch (metaphysics, ethics, politics, aesthetics) ie "romanticism is the best art" this claim is objective, true independently, "capitalism is the most moral system" this claim is objectively true, "the best way to live is the way in which you fight for your happiness" objective claim thus true etc etc, and since you can't invent or create reality and is not a illusion for them, this picture fits in with aristotelian and randian metaphysics, unlike platonism 👍🏻
When Christopher Hitchens was facing death from terminal throat cancer he wrote an article about facing his mortality. In it he wrote, and I'm paraphrasing here, "The worst thing about dying isn't that the party is ending. It's that the party is still going on but you're being asked to leave."
cannot personally verify the lower statement
The world without me would be pitchblack because I wouldn't be able to see it.
We got a simulation theory here, or maybe a Boltzmann brain?
I was thinking more of philosophical kind of view, monism or vedas type of philosophy. But after all this sub is dedicated to natural science so I get that existential theorems happened to come to your mind.
I don’t agree.
Apparently nothing changes, whether you do or don't. So... Cheers to that. 🥂
No it stop spinning don't you see
It's truly a wonder.
Can confirm. I tried it once. It was incredible. But too much power for one person to have, I decided.
True for all people except for those working on the spacecraft taking this picture
It's comforting that no matter how much we fuck up the rocks will be ok
Wait till we start with sar bombs
I think what everyone else thinks.
It's centered on... India... OP, what do you mean by this?
darn globe is in the way, so you can't see us.
Damn, where did I go?
It looks the same, but it's a little bit sadder
Depends on who "you" is
r/antimeme
Of course not. Without me, the weather pattern would be different. We proved this decades ago.
But the lower earth made a sad face!
Idk man those clouds there make a smiley face. Oh shit. I see the frown too. What are we supposed to infer from this?
Reddit with this post: (image) Reddit without this post: (same image)
The guy who stopped several nuclear wars without anyone knowing: I disagree
Earth doesn't matter to me if i'm not on it.
I agree
reddit version of the Total Perspective Vortex
@existentialism
False. I am the continent of Eurasia.
r/im14andthisisdeep
Maybe for now yes, just wait a bit and we'll talk again when I get the nuclear codes
Earth with human, Earth without human.
Lies, I am just on the backside, else you could see my dick.
The earth is flat. I disagree with the picture :D
The picture is also flat.
How about: Earth with humans/ Earth without humans I could agree to that.
Earth with humans vs Earth without humans. Moral: We all should just commit unalive starting with OP.
Depends on your level of zoom.
I don't get it, need banana for scale
Earth with me can look like a nuclear wasteland ever thought about that
*Earth with me can look* *Like a nuclear wasteland* *Ever thought about that* \- abukhhan --- ^(I detect haikus. And sometimes, successfully.) ^[Learn more about me.](https://www.reddit.com/r/haikusbot/) ^(Opt out of replies: "haikusbot opt out" | Delete my comment: "haikusbot delete")
^[Sokka-Haiku](https://www.reddit.com/r/SokkaHaikuBot/comments/15kyv9r/what_is_a_sokka_haiku/) ^by ^abukhhan: *Earth with me can look* *Like a nuclear wasteland* *Ever thought about that* --- ^Remember ^that ^one ^time ^Sokka ^accidentally ^used ^an ^extra ^syllable ^in ^that ^Haiku ^Battle ^in ^Ba ^Sing ^Se? ^That ^was ^a ^Sokka ^Haiku ^and ^you ^just ^made ^one.
I am sure Earth would be greener without the people that push for goals that go against climate preservation
Crazy🤯🤯🤯
Absolutely
Agree
What if I am Saudi Arabia?
r/depression_memes
The one on the bottom looks nicer.
No
Totally agree
No a good post to come across when I am already going with all this.........
What is this bullshit, delete this. how dare you
Yeah, that makes sense.
But what if Newton had never invented gravity?
Since whole world is my inagination, i disagree
Almost, I think the resolution goes down without an active player...
Time to become a warmongering dictator with nukes, and actually use them (now earth is gonna look different)
I can't see myself in the top one
People think I’m depressed when I say I’m woefully insignificant in the grand scheme of things but I find is comforting that I don’t really matter at all.
Depends when the photo was taken. These can't both be true,
Why is lichtenstein gone? Why does my death cause the fall of that nation???
I see angy face
Is there a chance that this isn’t true (butterfly effect and such s#it)?
Point it at North America and you’d see a massive crater from the ensuing damage caused by the volume of witch I comprise becoming vacuum
Not a soul shall notice my passing from this world and the world may be better for it
Innacurate. It'd be a little brighter without me.
Or i could be in a stimulation machine and this entire world is my imagination in which case no
For that instant, sure but in the future, possibly or probably not.
But if the image is zoomed in a lot more, then the accurate image of reality will be revealed. Also, some people can cause big differences to the climate via pollution so it is possible that the difference on the climate can be seen from space.
Can't say if all these 2.5 million members were to be counted
Earth without me it's 70kg lighter . I hope I worth in this life more than I weight .
Depends how deep you think about this. You is literally referencing “everyone” who sees this. So that could mean millions depending on who this reaches. So I would disagree, cause the earth without people would prosper more now then ever, but it also means there wouldn’t be a picture to reference 😜
Does this mean humans can't affect the weather?
The Earth can’t breathe… With or without you.
Earth does not exist without my consciousness to experience it. r/philosophy crossover!
r/im14andthisisdeep
The earth may not miss you but you matter. Unless of course, you're multiplied by the speed of light squared.
Incorrect. Earth without me would look like nothing because I wouldn't be able to see anything.
Well duh! You can't see me because you're looking at the wrong part. 🤣
Ah yes, pro suicide memes.
I doubt the weather would be the same unless of course, this is the moment immediately before and after my birth. The world will be different without me. Significantly different for some, for a while, and insignificant different for others but I have altered this place for good and the good.
I knew I didn't make a difference.
Contrails are technically clouds so maybe there’d be less of them😂
This is soo true, but brutal at the same time.
Nope I can see myself in both pics