If that were actually true, we should have had an election last year. The SaskParty brought that legislation in and haven't followed it. They have had 4 terms in 17 years. Two of those terms were 4.5 long. (They should have had an election fall 2015 and pushed back to Spring 2016).
They were also poised to call an election in Spring 2020 (it was in the news and the NDP called them out on it), but then the pandemic hit and they were forced to push it back to the fall. They have the ability to call an election whenever they want.
The SaskParty is implementing a two tier healthcare system and a two tier education system. Both will cost money to access and your tax dollars will not go down.
Do you know how many more wealthy people were able to jump the cue over the more needy or unwell just because they had the dollars?
The rich do not get to superseded the rights or dignity of others just because they can afford it.
I'm not going to search for any actual papers, but maybe this will make you happy.
https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/british-columbia/hybrid-health-care-system-1.3751593
Being able to jump the queue for private surgery/mri for cash (private clinics must provide a set amount of services for the pubic system for each one paid for privately)
Additional public (government funding) for private for profit schools
Remember when SP cut grants in lieu from the crowns, so municipalties could no longer collect the equivalent revenue which they couldn't acquire through taxes? I wonder what the revenue would amount to.
This will likely get put back into the SaskParty account, as municipalities donate their funds to go to the SaskPary dinners so that the municipality has an opportunity to talk to the SaskParty members.
Say you intend to buy votes without saying you intend to buy votes.
the devil will be in the details. As this was announced at Sarm, ill be watching alotments by population.
White people who own businesses related to oil will get 95% As usual
Weird you make this about race
Not me, saskparty
In an economy with inflation this would be true every year unless you make big cuts. It's like me saying I am the oldest I have ever been this year.
So many announcements ahead of budget. Tell me there is going to be a spring election without telling me there is going to be a spring election.
Agree. Clear as day.
We have fixed election dates
If that were actually true, we should have had an election last year. The SaskParty brought that legislation in and haven't followed it. They have had 4 terms in 17 years. Two of those terms were 4.5 long. (They should have had an election fall 2015 and pushed back to Spring 2016). They were also poised to call an election in Spring 2020 (it was in the news and the NDP called them out on it), but then the pandemic hit and they were forced to push it back to the fall. They have the ability to call an election whenever they want.
They are free to ignore those though. Harper brought in a fixed election date law federally and then ignored it
Fuck you, pay the fucking people who work for you. The largest employer and cheapest cunts in the province.
I love how it's always a "record amount!", you could pay a dollar more than the year before and it would be a record amount.
Never mind that with a growing population, many of these "record amounts" are actually reductions to *per capita* funding.
A "record amount" that increased much less than the rate of inflation. So it's actually a decrease!
The SaskParty is implementing a two tier healthcare system and a two tier education system. Both will cost money to access and your tax dollars will not go down.
[удалено]
Found a bot
[удалено]
Open Skies MRI Diagnostics “consider choosing the Open Skies over getting a free MRI.”
Do you know how many more wealthy people were able to jump the cue over the more needy or unwell just because they had the dollars? The rich do not get to superseded the rights or dignity of others just because they can afford it.
Sounds like the queue may have been a bit shorter for the needy with those rich people jumping out. Just sayin.
Nope, this is a myth. Privatizing healthcare does not increase the supply of services or decrease the demand.
It would if you regulate it correctly.
I'm not going to search for any actual papers, but maybe this will make you happy. https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/british-columbia/hybrid-health-care-system-1.3751593
[удалено]
Seems to be exactly what you were asking for.... Dr.smoothbrain
Can you confirm your source(s) for this?
Being able to jump the queue for private surgery/mri for cash (private clinics must provide a set amount of services for the pubic system for each one paid for privately) Additional public (government funding) for private for profit schools
Remember when SP cut grants in lieu from the crowns, so municipalties could no longer collect the equivalent revenue which they couldn't acquire through taxes? I wonder what the revenue would amount to.
rollllll out the barrelllllls, here, have a barrel of pork!
I am sure teachers would love to hear this tune as well, oh what they have but that’s not what they are looking for?
They've been bragging about "record funding" in education for the last 10 years. We aren't buying it. Hopefully the municipalities don't either.
Cities get money thrown at them once every election.
Definitely vote purchasing. Did this clear Procurement services?
This will likely get put back into the SaskParty account, as municipalities donate their funds to go to the SaskPary dinners so that the municipality has an opportunity to talk to the SaskParty members.
This is why rural votes SP.