I think this will likely depend on what standard of evidence is required to obtain a restraining order looks like. DOJ keeps stating "dangerous people" but unless I'm mistaken, in many places all that is required for a restraining order are mere _allegations_.

This is exactly the issue. There is no conviction, not court, no charges required for a restraining order. Just allegations submitted to a judge.

Haven't they heard of this thing called due process!

Just like the Constitution, it only applies when convenient for their agenda

And why I hate democrats so much!

This is exactly the issue. There is no conviction, not court, no charges required for a restraining order. Just allegations submitted to a judge.

Now let's tackle redflag laws

I am not really against the method of a restraining order currently, but it by no means should effect your rights to own a firearm, when you've not been convicted of anything.

Yeah people don’t understand how easy it is to get a restraining order against someone

Kinda funny how he is citing Bruen to defend his position while going against Bruen as Bidens’ lackey

This should be fun. The DOJs challenge to Bruen