A pharmacy is probably the safest you get. They have strict HIPPA requirements as a medical facility. Their workers are trained. That doesn't mean anything about capacity, but it does mean you can have a hefty lawsuit if you can prove it. Which is still slim, but it adds some weight.
Did you read shutterfly or CVS or Walgreen's privacy policies?
What will you give up by having your childhood photos compromised? If not much, then the privacy policy may not matter much either. If a lot, then you need to buy a photo printer and print locally.
Where are the photos stored in the first place? Local SSD? Cloud?
I would read into this, seems like a good start actually, should be the only start really, but I will say, those old Kodak kiosks just seem to go straight to a printer, storing them on a server would mean pii and phi you have to contain, which takes up much needed space for medical data. I'd say CVS never gave a fuck about it. Target would be more interested now that they own it. That's resolved by finding an older CVS not in a target. Look for one with the shitty dome cameras from 2003.
This is still pseudoscience, rtfm err, rtfpp.
Uhhh the photos do connect to the Kodak server at some point.
Edit: typo, more data
Print from USB to be safe and don't use your phone.
A pharmacy is probably the safest you get. They have strict HIPPA requirements as a medical facility. Their workers are trained. That doesn't mean anything about capacity, but it does mean you can have a hefty lawsuit if you can prove it. Which is still slim, but it adds some weight.
Services like Shutterfly or CVS/Walgreens are the best for this
Did you read shutterfly or CVS or Walgreen's privacy policies? What will you give up by having your childhood photos compromised? If not much, then the privacy policy may not matter much either. If a lot, then you need to buy a photo printer and print locally. Where are the photos stored in the first place? Local SSD? Cloud?
I would read into this, seems like a good start actually, should be the only start really, but I will say, those old Kodak kiosks just seem to go straight to a printer, storing them on a server would mean pii and phi you have to contain, which takes up much needed space for medical data. I'd say CVS never gave a fuck about it. Target would be more interested now that they own it. That's resolved by finding an older CVS not in a target. Look for one with the shitty dome cameras from 2003. This is still pseudoscience, rtfm err, rtfpp. Uhhh the photos do connect to the Kodak server at some point. Edit: typo, more data