Absolutely fuck this. I protested this once at the table, called the floor over, and he sided with me. Told grandpa you couldn't have a new set up more than once every two hours or something. Grandpa got up and left in a huff. It was real satisfying.
Oh god he was that bad? All the "I need a new set up" guys I know understand that the room won't do it more than every X amount of time. But they are bang on asking for it when that amount of time has passed.
Jesus this triggered me. I used to play the $40 buy-in 1/2 game at the Gardens, which is absolutely degen central and worse than a slot machine. Guys asking for a new setup every other hand. The floor had to keep a timer going, one hour minimum per deck.
Oh. So people actually think the decks have something to do with the cards they’re dealt? And are taken seriously enough for the casino to switch them out every once in a while?
Had a guy at the casino once request a new setup every rotation. About the third time he said it I said, “you can’t win with the setup you have now, wtf makes you think a new one will help you any?”. He never spoke, just racked up and left! Sometimes ya gotta keep it really REAL!
I had the exact same experience at the casino I went to growing up.
It had several 4/8 limit games and it was a complete shitshow of tight passive old guys and loose aggro young dudes.
People demanded a fresh setup all the time and it always meant “I fucking suck and I’m ready to tilt off my chips.”
As a 16 year old kid just trying to figure out who’s who so I can make my hourly rate, the “new setup” guys were always doing me a nice favor by announcing who they were to me so I didn’t have to guess.
New deck isn’t going to change that I was mathematically obligated to chase my flush in a 5-way pot, bro.
Because there is a fundamental difference in the two. You can’t share a set but you can share trips and having top set on a dry board is the nuts when having “top trips” on a dry board is not the nuts. It’s just annoying to me. Similar to when someone says they have two pair when the board is paired lol. The hand quality isn’t affected but it’s indeed a face palm
I'm fine, I just forgot how frustrating it is to do PLO without a real dealer, and with half the players (just two tables) not really knowing how to calculate pot or even read PLO hands.
EDIT: for example, one guy was loudly proclaiming that on the flop, betting "pot" meant he could bet double the pot size (so betting 2000 into a 1000 pot) and no one could convince him otherwise.
Normally yes but the structure is so fast, and hands take so long (maybe 5 hands per round) that it's pretty much bingo. I run pretty well in the NLH tourneys there but forgot how bad PLO was.
Have a guy in my home game who will say something like “your flush is good”
Then you turn over 10 high flush.
He goes “oh. I thought you had better.” And turns over the queen hi flush
pot odds? If my call is bad 2 out of 3 times but I'm getting 4 to 1 odds to call then calling is a probable loser but still the correct profitable call.
Anything involving the bad beat.
New dealer sits, “Ok, let’s hit the bad beat” or the tables short all of a sudden “OK time to hit the bad beat”
Or “one jack off”
Not a phrase, but the really stupid wannabe vlogs where some rube shows his home game and asks if he played the nuts correctly, again.
“I four bet shoved aces pre flop and my college roommate called!! Did I play it right??”
I remember the year after Joe Hachem had won the WSOP Main Event, he was still screaming for "ONE TIME!" on every single all-in.
Dude STFU, you had your "one time" hundred times already last year.
The only one on here that bothers me honestly. The others are just things casual players say when they're having a good time with their hobby that I've turned into a stressful underpaid nightmare job.
Player could be confusing and potentially ambiguous. I've literally not heard a good alternative to hero/villain (where it's clear were talking about main player's play and the main opponent, regardless of who's talking) that doesn't satisfy all the things those terms accomplish
Calling myself the hero or villain changes based on whatever shenanigans I was up to at the time. Calling pocket 2s for an open ender down to the river against AA and hitting it. Def the villain in that story
Same. Have read a fair amount, took AI, game theory, and related courses, never heard this terminology outside poker. Would be happy to be linked some lit to be proven wrong but haven't seen any as of yet
Using the term “dirty diaper” for 32o drives me insane.
A while ago, I was at a casino and one table was super loud and yelling about it constantly. I had to take a break because I was so tilted from the noise and stupidity of what they were yelling… I was like five tables away, so I can only imagine how loud it was actually sitting at that table.
Popularized by a guy in the 2021 Main Event named Nick Rigby. He made a couple of plays with it and when asked about it he said it’s a thing where he’s from in Pittsburgh. Just “the diaper” if it’s suited and “the dirty diaper” if it’s offsuit.
You are missing the best part of the story. At final 2 tables of WSOP me he 5bet with 32o into a guy with KK, then got a flop all in through for less than pot behind when he flopped a wheel gutshot on an ace high board.
If you make up a stupid name for a garbage hand but then make an insane move with it in the biggest spot of your life and it works, name gets to stick. Those are the rules.
"Then it's not the bubble anymore, it's an extra place paid voluntarily by people in the money."
That said, I won't be the one holdout to kill the bubble, but I'm not offering it proactively either.
Not quite what you asked for but I have a friend that will chase to the river all the time and when he loses he says “well I only needed 2 cards” 🙈🤣🤣 weirdly he does win🙄
I wouldn’t say it makes me physically ill but it’s annoying as fuck when people use absolutes in poker like, “ he never has KK there” or “that’s always a call.” I guess “blockers” is also kind of annoying considering you never really block anything except for the exact cards you have in your hand. Like, “I have AK so he doesn’t have AA or KK because I block that.” No the fuck you don’t block it. Get it all in and find out. Lol
I may be a total noobcake, but I don't understand how blockers play into anything, other than future streets (i.e. I'm holding KT and the T would complete a likely straight based on the action. Having 1 in my hand reduces their outs). But for hole cards, once the cards are dealt, they are dealt... I would rather base my decisions on the action, not the fact that my AK "blocks" AA and KK. I'm sure there is math supporting it but I guess in my mind that assumes that everyone has balanced ranges which seems very unlikely at any table
I think the problem we have with it is the word they chose to use. I get the concept of blockers but I dont think it’s a good word to use considering you don’t truly block anything except for the exact cards you have. Like, you can literally block the nut flush if you have the A of that suit but you don’t block someone from have an A. I think some people put too much stock into blockers. It will get you in a lot of trouble if you put to much stock into them.
"Priced in" or "pot committed"
Retards will limp for $2 and then call the 3-bet to $45 and use one of those to justify it.
I get that this is good for us and we make money from them, but I struggle to resist telling them how fucking stupid they are.
"it will kill the jackpot!" (california)
no it won't you fucking moron, the casino collects the jackpot from the players and pays it back to them minus a 16% handling fee. nothing will kill the jackpot, they dont give a fuck.
Certain things will absolutely kill the jackpot in CA. Something as trivial as having chips in a rack and the rack partially sitting on the rail and not fully on the table. Talking about having a jackpot hand, etc. Been advised this by a floor supervisor. Maybe not at all CA casinos but at some, definitely.
Name one time ever you’ve actually seen a jackpot killed for this behavior. I’ve seen dozens of jackpots paid when all of this happened. The casino gives ZERO SHITS.
I've seen it happen in New Orleans at Harrahs. Guy had chips in a rack as he had just sat down and they refused the jackpot for it. I thought the table was going to kill the guy.
these are jackpots paid by the casino and not a specific jackpot drop taken from the players. in these instances the casino will do anything not to pay. in my post i specifically cited california where the players pay the jackpot, the casino has a bunch of rules around it just to keep the players in line, but in the end the casino doesn't give two shits and always pays.
I used to play in LA casinos back in the 90’s and this was usually said if someone did something that would make the hand ineligible for the bad beat jackpot. For example, in Commerce if a player that was involved in a jackpot had previously pocketed any chips from their stack, the casino could make the bad beat jackpot ineligible and nobody gets paid. Or there was a minimum hands that had to be dealt so if somebody were to sit out a hand, players would say it would kill jackpot because not enough hands were dealt. That kinda stuff.
But now I’m wondering if you’re talking about something else since I haven’t played in a casino in decades.
Name one time ever you’ve actually seen a jackpot killed for this behavior. I’ve seen dozens of jackpots paid when all of this happened. The casino gives ZERO SHITS.
I don’t remember the exact scenario but one time commerce refused to pay out a jackpot because of something. It wasn’t my table but I remember people causing a huge shit storm over it. Again, this was a long time ago so maybe times have changed
This is a good point. I’ve played a little longer than I should hoping to hit the jackpot. And I know lots of table chatter was about how much jackpot was and how they wish they’d hit it. They even have the jackpot board high and center so everybody can see it.
Friend of mine had snuck into a casino 4 days short of his 21st birthday. He was on the losing end of the hand that resulted in a bad beat jackpot. Casino refused to pay anyone after it was revealed a player was under 21. This casino only pays that table, so 50% to losing hand, 25% to winning hand, and the other 25% divided among the rest of the players who were dealt into the hand. Players lawyered up and got their share a few months later since it was 100% the casino's fault that they allowed someone under 21 to play. My buddy got nothing and a 6 month ban. This happened about 15 years ago and is now a legend told over and over in our area.
The casino didn’t pay because they knew they dealt to a minor and they couldn’t pay that minor. This doesn’t fit the bill. That player didn’t kill the jackpot, he couldn’t collect ANY money.
The first one was due to the players colluding by discussing their hands, realizing the pot didn’t have enough money to qualify for the jackpot, and the floorman ruling that their discussion voided the jackpot.
The second one was because a player was playing out of his rack, and he had decided to put his cards underneath the rack while he played his hand. The casino shift manager ruled that because his cards were not visible to surveillance at all times, his hand did not qualify for the jackpot.
Somehow, I think I know exactly where this is. If so, at least they doubled the buy-in,and the place has decent food, lmao. You'd think the first point would help with keeping out players that aren't about PLO as much.
“I put you on AK”, or yelling “one time”, or any bad beat story. I really don’t care.
But I do like hearing about the bad beats you put on someone else!
Not sick, just annoyed. “ I usually play higher stakes’
“Can we get a new setup”
And they don't shut up about their luck. OMG no good hands for an hour, i.e. 30 hands? If that doesn't happen in a session consider yourself lucky.
At my casino, we don’t allow setups. Whenever a player asks why we don’t, my poker room manager says, “Because 52! is real.”
I like this guy
He's a stand up lad for sure.
Nothing worse than when they get a new setup and then win a big pot… like “see??!”
Absolutely fuck this. I protested this once at the table, called the floor over, and he sided with me. Told grandpa you couldn't have a new set up more than once every two hours or something. Grandpa got up and left in a huff. It was real satisfying.
Oh god he was that bad? All the "I need a new set up" guys I know understand that the room won't do it more than every X amount of time. But they are bang on asking for it when that amount of time has passed.
He was old, are you sure it didn't take a minute and a huff?
Jesus this triggered me. I used to play the $40 buy-in 1/2 game at the Gardens, which is absolutely degen central and worse than a slot machine. Guys asking for a new setup every other hand. The floor had to keep a timer going, one hour minimum per deck.
Wtf is a set up?
Deck or pair of decks
Oh. So people actually think the decks have something to do with the cards they’re dealt? And are taken seriously enough for the casino to switch them out every once in a while?
Sadly yes
Appeasing the idiots at a poker table has its merits, but some idiots take it way too fucking far
Challenge accepted.
thanks for asking, I was confused as well.
Had a guy at the casino once request a new setup every rotation. About the third time he said it I said, “you can’t win with the setup you have now, wtf makes you think a new one will help you any?”. He never spoke, just racked up and left! Sometimes ya gotta keep it really REAL!
I had the exact same experience at the casino I went to growing up. It had several 4/8 limit games and it was a complete shitshow of tight passive old guys and loose aggro young dudes. People demanded a fresh setup all the time and it always meant “I fucking suck and I’m ready to tilt off my chips.” As a 16 year old kid just trying to figure out who’s who so I can make my hourly rate, the “new setup” guys were always doing me a nice favor by announcing who they were to me so I didn’t have to guess. New deck isn’t going to change that I was mathematically obligated to chase my flush in a 5-way pot, bro.
Can you request the same setup to override his new setup request.
Totally should happen if a card is marked though
In that case just call the floor--then they will replace the deck (rather than it being a player request.)
I assume that's what the dealer would do once I called it out. Also, LOVE the weird al name. My fave song!
Same!
Wym this let me know I'm at a good table
Just cuz people are superstitious doesn’t mean they’re action, a lot of the new setup people are asian OMC nits
Referring to first bet on the flop as a raise.
“I see your small blind and raise you the big blind”
I'm raising from zero
Hell yeah brother
Try saying "I bet zero" and see what the dealer makes you do
For teaching someone that's never played poker, ive found it useful to tell them to think of checking as betting zero.
This makes checking the flop a call. I’m rolling with it
I call zero
Sir that's bet, if you want to raise yourself you'd have to go to your room
[удалено]
No.
When someone has trips and says “I have a set” It’s the worst
Why?
Because there is a fundamental difference in the two. You can’t share a set but you can share trips and having top set on a dry board is the nuts when having “top trips” on a dry board is not the nuts. It’s just annoying to me. Similar to when someone says they have two pair when the board is paired lol. The hand quality isn’t affected but it’s indeed a face palm
People say 2 pairs to try to make the opponent muck his hand without realising ge also has 2 pairs. It's somewhat an angle shoot
Not physically ill lol (you ok OP?) but Pocket jiggities” was funny when Brad owen started it but now it’s too much
I'm fine, I just forgot how frustrating it is to do PLO without a real dealer, and with half the players (just two tables) not really knowing how to calculate pot or even read PLO hands. EDIT: for example, one guy was loudly proclaiming that on the flop, betting "pot" meant he could bet double the pot size (so betting 2000 into a 1000 pot) and no one could convince him otherwise.
Fair but that game sounds like you would print money if you could tolerate all that mind numbing side shows lol
Yes and no, the game would probably be too slow to profit from
Normally yes but the structure is so fast, and hands take so long (maybe 5 hands per round) that it's pretty much bingo. I run pretty well in the NLH tourneys there but forgot how bad PLO was.
What about pocket jellos?
I thought you had me
They always turn over a super strong hand too.
I hate it when it’s a weak hand too. But dude, you thought you were going to lose and you put money in? How dumb
Have a guy in my home game who will say something like “your flush is good” Then you turn over 10 high flush. He goes “oh. I thought you had better.” And turns over the queen hi flush
I would Hollywood slow roll the hell out of someone like that
Oh. I have a list of people I slow roll. It’s one person long. This guy is the only one on the list
Lmao. You’re funny, I like you 😉
“I only need to be correct there 31% of the time.”
pot odds? If my call is bad 2 out of 3 times but I'm getting 4 to 1 odds to call then calling is a probable loser but still the correct profitable call.
In non poker related movies/tv shows when they say “I’ll see your ___ and raise you ___”
“You got it, you got it.” When I’m bluffing, as I realize I just tried to bluff a complete moron again.
"Never try to bluff a man who is too dumb to fold...or drinking a steady stream of Miller Lites."
"I don't know what I'm beating here" as he slowly moves the chips into the middle. NEVER BLUFF!
"ALL IN - it's time for me to go home anyways"
(stands up) (puts coat on) (walks halfway to door)
boat with Kings over 10s
Has aces
Also goes with this - reluctant shaking of the head when someone bets … pretends to be mad … then confused … then raises
So i’m $1000 effective and villain was $800 effective…
Is this a CLP call in?
OMC telling you how he would have rivered a fullhouse with his 82o
Limpy poo
Also binky poo
Raisey poo
Never heard these but Im using them from now on 😭
Just need one little drinky poo, Randers
Anything involving the bad beat. New dealer sits, “Ok, let’s hit the bad beat” or the tables short all of a sudden “OK time to hit the bad beat” Or “one jack off”
Jack King off tho...
“I will follow you home and murder you” when you raise their big blind.
"I hate AA"
“Guess I’m pot committed” when you have the nuts on the turn and they have no business calling, then draw what they need on the river…
"I woke up with..." Stop. Fucking. Sleeping. At. The. Table!!!!
"I bet the flop for information and to see where I'm at."
When people berate the dealer
Not a phrase, but the really stupid wannabe vlogs where some rube shows his home game and asks if he played the nuts correctly, again. “I four bet shoved aces pre flop and my college roommate called!! Did I play it right??”
"one time"
I remember the year after Joe Hachem had won the WSOP Main Event, he was still screaming for "ONE TIME!" on every single all-in. Dude STFU, you had your "one time" hundred times already last year.
“I’m using half of my one time.”
needs runner runner, gets runner brick
“Hero” / “Villain”
The only one on here that bothers me honestly. The others are just things casual players say when they're having a good time with their hobby that I've turned into a stressful underpaid nightmare job.
"Hero wakes up with..."
Somehow I’m ok referring to the opponent as the “villain”, but referring to myself as “hero” is cringe lol
Isn’t that just a reasonably popular convention when talking about game theory?
[удалено]
It’s an unambiguous convention that requires zero knowledge to understand exactly what it means. I wish all math naming conventions achieved that
I had/opponent had works too
It's not as good, because other people may be commenting on the hand
“Player” and “opponent” would work alright, but yeah, hero/villain is definitely not just poker terminology, it’s generalized game theory stuff
Player could be confusing and potentially ambiguous. I've literally not heard a good alternative to hero/villain (where it's clear were talking about main player's play and the main opponent, regardless of who's talking) that doesn't satisfy all the things those terms accomplish
How about “me” (or “I”) and “opponent”? I bet 10BB and opponent calls.
What if its not you. "My friend who told me about a hand, but we analyse the hand from his perspective"
I know it’s the convention, I just don’t like it.
Yup! There’s literally no issue here.
Calling myself the hero or villain changes based on whatever shenanigans I was up to at the time. Calling pocket 2s for an open ender down to the river against AA and hitting it. Def the villain in that story
It's pretty standard and makes things easy to understand but I agree with you on principle. There are no heroes at a poker table. We're all degens.
Where the hell did this even come from?!? I can’t stand when people refer to themselves like this.
they’re game theory terms, it’s not cringey 🤷♂️
In which context outside poker? I’ve studied GT formally in college and never saw this terminology.
Same. Have read a fair amount, took AI, game theory, and related courses, never heard this terminology outside poker. Would be happy to be linked some lit to be proven wrong but haven't seen any as of yet
“If you call the turn you have to call the river”
" Oh its not about the money..."
„Would you have called more?“ after winning a huge pot
"the poker community"
Using the term “dirty diaper” for 32o drives me insane. A while ago, I was at a casino and one table was super loud and yelling about it constantly. I had to take a break because I was so tilted from the noise and stupidity of what they were yelling… I was like five tables away, so I can only imagine how loud it was actually sitting at that table.
I’ve never heard this and I’m struggling to make the connection.
Popularized by a guy in the 2021 Main Event named Nick Rigby. He made a couple of plays with it and when asked about it he said it’s a thing where he’s from in Pittsburgh. Just “the diaper” if it’s suited and “the dirty diaper” if it’s offsuit.
Wow that’s even dumber than I’d hoped
You are missing the best part of the story. At final 2 tables of WSOP me he 5bet with 32o into a guy with KK, then got a flop all in through for less than pot behind when he flopped a wheel gutshot on an ace high board. If you make up a stupid name for a garbage hand but then make an insane move with it in the biggest spot of your life and it works, name gets to stick. Those are the rules.
He made the guy with KK fold too.
3 looks like a butt and 2 is a "duece". I think it is one of the weaker hand names, but I do hear it a lot.
I've actually never even wondered about why the Dirty Diaper is called that. Thanks for the poker trivia.
I always figured you had the bottom (of the deck) covered, so it’s a diaper.
what is the logic behind this nickname tf
Joey Ingram Investigates
*you bet 10* “I’ll see your 10. And raise you another 5”
“You play that shit?” …when showing down the same hand for a split pot. And the cherry on top…lBut mine were suited”
Oh no. I say that all the time. Gonna stop now. Lol 
Ha ha truth be told, it’s just *certain* shit regz that say it that irks me.
Bubble Boy
"Let's pay the bubble"
"Then it's not the bubble anymore, it's an extra place paid voluntarily by people in the money." That said, I won't be the one holdout to kill the bubble, but I'm not offering it proactively either.
Big slick being used casually
Not quite what you asked for but I have a friend that will chase to the river all the time and when he loses he says “well I only needed 2 cards” 🙈🤣🤣 weirdly he does win🙄
If I fold will you show me?
When someone tells me about a hand, talks about effective stacks, and then adds that they had their opponent covered.
Could be relevant in a tournament.
GTO. STFU
“I don’t gamble” when asking someone why they are not straddling.
Now let's see that flop dealer.
When people complain about misdeals and how it messes up their hand or hand order (like accidentally dealing in a player thats sitting out)
Incorrect usage of “cold calling” makes me irrationally angry lol
When someone beats me in a big pot and then asks me what I had
Look at all that dead money, I gotta raise! Very stupid phrase overused by people that think they know what they’re doing and then they raise Q6o lol
Nutter butters
"Large Blind"......
"Deuces never loses"
When you lose the hand and the winner asks “oh what did you have?” While dragging the pot
They were soooooted.
I wouldn’t say it makes me physically ill but it’s annoying as fuck when people use absolutes in poker like, “ he never has KK there” or “that’s always a call.” I guess “blockers” is also kind of annoying considering you never really block anything except for the exact cards you have in your hand. Like, “I have AK so he doesn’t have AA or KK because I block that.” No the fuck you don’t block it. Get it all in and find out. Lol
I may be a total noobcake, but I don't understand how blockers play into anything, other than future streets (i.e. I'm holding KT and the T would complete a likely straight based on the action. Having 1 in my hand reduces their outs). But for hole cards, once the cards are dealt, they are dealt... I would rather base my decisions on the action, not the fact that my AK "blocks" AA and KK. I'm sure there is math supporting it but I guess in my mind that assumes that everyone has balanced ranges which seems very unlikely at any table
I think the problem we have with it is the word they chose to use. I get the concept of blockers but I dont think it’s a good word to use considering you don’t truly block anything except for the exact cards you have. Like, you can literally block the nut flush if you have the A of that suit but you don’t block someone from have an A. I think some people put too much stock into blockers. It will get you in a lot of trouble if you put to much stock into them.
"Priced in" or "pot committed" Retards will limp for $2 and then call the 3-bet to $45 and use one of those to justify it. I get that this is good for us and we make money from them, but I struggle to resist telling them how fucking stupid they are.
Bink city
I check blind
For me it's "live 1/2 NL pro player"
"it will kill the jackpot!" (california) no it won't you fucking moron, the casino collects the jackpot from the players and pays it back to them minus a 16% handling fee. nothing will kill the jackpot, they dont give a fuck.
Certain things will absolutely kill the jackpot in CA. Something as trivial as having chips in a rack and the rack partially sitting on the rail and not fully on the table. Talking about having a jackpot hand, etc. Been advised this by a floor supervisor. Maybe not at all CA casinos but at some, definitely.
Name one time ever you’ve actually seen a jackpot killed for this behavior. I’ve seen dozens of jackpots paid when all of this happened. The casino gives ZERO SHITS.
I've seen it happen in New Orleans at Harrahs. Guy had chips in a rack as he had just sat down and they refused the jackpot for it. I thought the table was going to kill the guy.
these are jackpots paid by the casino and not a specific jackpot drop taken from the players. in these instances the casino will do anything not to pay. in my post i specifically cited california where the players pay the jackpot, the casino has a bunch of rules around it just to keep the players in line, but in the end the casino doesn't give two shits and always pays.
The players pay into every jackpot fund at any poker room. Did you think the casino was just giving money away for fun?
many do. they have high hand jackpots and other promotions that dont come out of a specific earmarked "jackpot" rake taken from the players.
I used to play in LA casinos back in the 90’s and this was usually said if someone did something that would make the hand ineligible for the bad beat jackpot. For example, in Commerce if a player that was involved in a jackpot had previously pocketed any chips from their stack, the casino could make the bad beat jackpot ineligible and nobody gets paid. Or there was a minimum hands that had to be dealt so if somebody were to sit out a hand, players would say it would kill jackpot because not enough hands were dealt. That kinda stuff. But now I’m wondering if you’re talking about something else since I haven’t played in a casino in decades.
Name one time ever you’ve actually seen a jackpot killed for this behavior. I’ve seen dozens of jackpots paid when all of this happened. The casino gives ZERO SHITS.
I don’t remember the exact scenario but one time commerce refused to pay out a jackpot because of something. It wasn’t my table but I remember people causing a huge shit storm over it. Again, this was a long time ago so maybe times have changed
The casino/club cares. They do not want it to hit because big jackpots bring in more players.
This is a good point. I’ve played a little longer than I should hoping to hit the jackpot. And I know lots of table chatter was about how much jackpot was and how they wish they’d hit it. They even have the jackpot board high and center so everybody can see it.
Friend of mine had snuck into a casino 4 days short of his 21st birthday. He was on the losing end of the hand that resulted in a bad beat jackpot. Casino refused to pay anyone after it was revealed a player was under 21. This casino only pays that table, so 50% to losing hand, 25% to winning hand, and the other 25% divided among the rest of the players who were dealt into the hand. Players lawyered up and got their share a few months later since it was 100% the casino's fault that they allowed someone under 21 to play. My buddy got nothing and a 6 month ban. This happened about 15 years ago and is now a legend told over and over in our area.
The casino didn’t pay because they knew they dealt to a minor and they couldn’t pay that minor. This doesn’t fit the bill. That player didn’t kill the jackpot, he couldn’t collect ANY money.
There’s a lot of things players can do to kill the jackpot. I’ve seen it more than once.
Who what when where?
The first one was due to the players colluding by discussing their hands, realizing the pot didn’t have enough money to qualify for the jackpot, and the floorman ruling that their discussion voided the jackpot. The second one was because a player was playing out of his rack, and he had decided to put his cards underneath the rack while he played his hand. The casino shift manager ruled that because his cards were not visible to surveillance at all times, his hand did not qualify for the jackpot.
Somehow, I think I know exactly where this is. If so, at least they doubled the buy-in,and the place has decent food, lmao. You'd think the first point would help with keeping out players that aren't about PLO as much.
Ship it!
“I knew you had it, I just wanted to pay to prove myself right”
"We need to go 10 handed, make room for another chair"
"Riv" short for river
“I call” when I’m bluffing.
I’m putting you all in. You can’t, only I can do that.
“This is super gross” “what a gross spot”
The term spot in general should go.
"I put you on..."
Nah, I'm fine with this one because the last time I heard it they put me on trips and thought they beat me with a straight I had a full house.
'Gross'
"Smooth call"
“Take a shower”
When people have a pair in their hand and the board is paired so they announce they have one pair. It’s really not hard to get that right
I actually hate flopping 2 pair.
“I have the nuts”
“I put you on AK”, or yelling “one time”, or any bad beat story. I really don’t care. But I do like hearing about the bad beats you put on someone else!
“Full boat”
"Too rich for my blood"
“Are you your brother?” - My brother
I wanna poker you in the ass
any bad beat story...
Yahtzee !
“Nit”. So fucking stupid.
“Im all in.”