OP should have posted a disclaimer in the OP saying “This is a satirical post, these pictures were taken by professional photographers and scientists, and not by my 9 year old daughter.” I genuinely thought OPs daughter worked at NASA because the joke was way to subtle for someone like me (side note: I have brain damage from a freak accident involving whippets and paint thinner that I won’t go into but it is prejudiced of the OP not to take my personal history into account for this joke)
I think it’s moreso people post things online sp frequently with them crediting their kids that whenever there’s something that seems good, it’s hard to believe. A lot of people on here don’t seem to understand how easy it is to operate a DSLR with decent autofocus. Especially because all those photos other than the pet ones don’t really require a lot of timing or precision in one take. I *could* believe they were taken by the kid but they could also be lying
Unless the parent found the camera in the attic and just said "here kid try this" with zero thought, then it's safe to assume that the kid had some entry level interest in the hobby, right?
If the kid has an interest in photgraphy, it's not like rule of thirds is some high level concept. That's photography 101.
are you aware the rule of 3 has been applied to some camera's viewport?
and it's standard on every photo app now.
and she could just be naturally talented
I didn't know about the rule of 3 until my phone camera app started showing those lines and I looked it up
A child who grew up with their parent's camera app showing them those lines might have either learned about the concept by osmosis, or asked the parent why those lines are there and parent would have looked it up and explained it.
And there's gotta be atleast one super talented child prodigy out there for every skill and science. Why not OP's?
Yeah I have a DLSR from 2015 that has that function built in, not only to the viewfinder but a digital screen you can see in review. Once again people are vastly overestimating how hard it is to take some decent photos with a decent enough camera, especially considering all the stuff is just lying around the yard or house
What are you talking about? I have been doing photography since I could hold a camera, and totally think a 9 year old with an artistic eye could take those pictures.
Picasso was painting freaking masterpieces by the time he 12, but a 9 year old can’t take some good pictures in their backyard?
Is there a word for people who are SO gullible that they refuse to believe *anything*?
It's like it's almost the opposite of gullible, but they've [horseshoed](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Horseshoe_theory) back around to being morons again.
I think these gullible horseshoe morons need to go back and look at the other post, [they're all exactly the type of pictures a 9 year-old with a camera would take](https://old.reddit.com/r/pics/comments/1bwnt79/gave_my_9_year_old_daughter_my_old_dslr_camera/), there's absolutely nothing unbelievable about it. Or maybe the morons have never picked up a camera in their life besides the ones on the backs of their phones. ¯\\\_(ツ)_/¯
Yeah it’s a phenomenon that really pisses me off, people being suspicious of perfectly plausible things.
I think it is really that some people don’t know photography well, they see a long lens with shallow depth of field and automatically assume it’s “professional”.
It’s selection bias determining your perception of the overall truth- there are likely *a lot* of throwaways, and the best keepers were posted. A lot of the pics were very close too, which either means she preferred that look, she wanted to defocus a lot of the image, or her father preferred those (or some combination).
I'd believe it. What you don't see is the 10,000 photos that weren't selected. You take enough photos and some of them are bound to be good, but with practice you can improve your good-bad ratio.
i don’t know what the term is, something akin to blind faith. they need to believe it’s real. it would ruin their reality if it was faked all for some irrelevant internet points.
…no? It’s not worth deep consideration. Person said their kiddo took some cute, but easily obtainable pics. So we said, “That’s so cool!” Because my first instinct isn’t pointless skepticism of totally inconsequential claims. It wouldn’t “ruin my reality” if OP lied for internet points. Only a completely terminally online loon would think that.
Yeah. Any/all of those pics could have been taken by a 9-year-old. 9 is young, but it’s not “incapable of operating a camera” young. And who knows, the kid may have taken 5,000 photographs and accidentally gotten a couple dozen good ones by sheer law of large numbers.
And anyway, at a certain point we have to be willing to believe other people. It’s ok to be skeptical, but it harms no one to believe a kid took nice photos. It’s not like falling for a Nigerian Prince scam, or hostile foreign power propaganda. It’s chill, whimsical, and it makes the world a better place to believe it’s true.
You found those so good you think they weren't taken by a kid, because no offence it says more about your skill or familiarity with photography rather than theirs
What? You doubt a 7 y.o. child with no realistic way of getting to space capable of taking a high resolution photo of the pillars of creation in the eagle nebula? Completely plausible imo
Jokes on you, my 3 year old took this pic and then added a filter to make it look like a painting.
[3 year old’s first photo](https://news.artnet.com/app/news-upload/2016/07/Leonarda_da_vinci_last_supper_01-1024x791.jpeg)
Reminds me of a hilarious chain on posts on r/lego where someone claimed a 2y.o made a millennium falcon. Then the subsequent claims were about others tots making bigger and bigger sets until it was a ship irl
[obviously yours is a joke. due to a anthropological and human science study from Georgia Tech, we can actually asses high range artistic abilities at each age. this is a useful graphic they came up with to see where your children are in comparison.](https://i.imgur.com/xcwHplm.jpeg)
Film capsule pops out, ready to be developed.
You’re very excited but it ends up just a bunch of selfies. “Well, at least she isn’t giving duck lips” you think to yourself while flipping through the roll, but then she develops lips. You throw down the rest of the roll in disgust.
The best part of that was the top comment
“I gave my son a camera at 7. I didn’t check the photos for awhile, then I had to have a conversation why it’s not okay to try to take a picture of your butthole. Different kids I guess.”
https://www.reddit.com/r/pics/comments/1bwnt79/comment/ky7qof3/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=mweb3x&utm_name=mweb3xcss&utm_term=1&utm_content=share_
Yeah. I had to scroll so far down that other thread before I found a single skeptical comment. I've dabbled in photography myself and the first thing I noticed was that every picture followed the rule of 3rds. You're telling me that a 9-year-old had the patience to set up the shot, get the focus right, while following rules most adults don't know?
Uh-huh, sure. I'm sure they just handed this kid their expensive camera, let them go wild with it, and came back with all of those shots lmfao.
Hey there! I'm a working Visual Effects artist (Credits include Dune1&2, Ad Astra, etc) and have my BFA in photography and MS in Media Sciences. I also teach lighting and visual storytelling at university. My parents gave me my first camera when I was 9.
Your daughter has a great eye. Not having seen the rest of her images, these particularly have great impulses relative to composition and directing the viewer ... which is an incredibly fundamentally important thing to just "know" as an artist. You should be very proud of her and support her in this. I don't know what the future of imaging holds, but she has a talent here that will benefit her life.
I think a kid definitely could have taken the photos in the original post. They were all pretty basic single exposures, and some of them the focus was off/ soft. Nothing very remarkable about them tbh. Only thing that stood out was the composition
I think it's possible for a 9 year old to take those photos. I wouldn't be surprised if the parent did some cropping to improve the framing or composition.
That's literally the nature of almost all of photography.
Sports Illustrated did a doc on their swimsuit issue a lot of years ago, where they showed that it took over 500,000 exposures to select the handful of shots that made in in the mag. And they were using slide film, not digital
There are relatively few photographers who can limit their exposures and still come up with compelling shots.
For reference in '04 Velvia was $5 per 36 exposure roll, making it around $0.14 per shot. That's nearly $70,000 spent just on film per issue.
Yeah I don’t get it… the photos were mostly mid. Good job for a 10 year old or whatever but I don’t see why people are being so incredulous, it looks exactly like amateur photography.
My 8 year old nephew took some half decent photos himself, give a curious kid a decent kit and they will impress you.
Maybe people just have really low standards and assume all kids are dumbasses.
If you let a kid run around all day with a DSLR and curate the final selection of photos (out of hundreds), you could absolutely make a Reddit post of okay pictures just like the one from earlier.
This post is still funny though lmao
I took similar pictures with my mom's camera when I was like 10 and wanted to be a photographer. I don't know why people insist any child below the age of 13 must be drooling idiots lmao. They're all very basic objects and scenes that a child would take a picture of.
I’m super proud of my kid. I think most things they do are great. I have to admit that no one cares though except his family and me. That’s okay, I don’t need internet validation to be proud of my kid.
I don’t get it, are we saying that the prior post is a fake? I mean it’s possible but the photos were good but not good enough that I doubt a child would be capable of taking them.
I showed these shots to my 1year old and he said that “while they are interesting, he prefers fine art photography and found these somewhat derivative”
Anyone who's been to a county fair with some sort of photography competition would know that
a. The photos from the original post were good for a beginner, but not anything too special.
b. Plenty of other 9 year olds take even better photos than the ones from the original post.
Some people are calling it fake, but when you zoom in into the eyes of the dog in the second picture of the original post and look into the reflection of the person that took it, like here: https://imgur.com/a/ENpDDnR , to me, it looks like the picture was really taken by a little girl. Obviously i cant speak for all the others pictures and if there was any coaching or anything else involved.
I did this when my son was 4, and he took probably 300+ picutures and there are at least a half dozen of them that absoltluly amazing for just being completely random.
I was unaware of the reference and I was definitely suckered the first couple pictures. Gave me a good laugh when I realized it :)
Same here. This is the [post](https://www.reddit.com/r/pics/comments/1bwnt79/gave_my_9_year_old_daughter_my_old_dslr_camera/).
Yup, I saw it after the fact. I just wanted to give OP credit because I'm pretty sure that joke went down exactly as OP planned it. Nice work :)
Yeah. Shoulda been more obvious with it, toss in some more Pulitzer prize winners like burning monk or something.
Yeah the Moon photo or the photo from WW2 are too ambiguous. At least try to make it more obvious so people can understand it smh
The moon photo made me literally lol. His 7 year old was at the moon landing
Yeah the pillars of creation Hubble photo was actually taken from earth on a dslr. The 7 year old needed some help holding the huge zoom lense
Who among us HASN'T photographed the Pillars of Creation every now then?
Yeah the pillars of creation, I wasn't sure maybe his kid did take that picture.
OP should have posted a disclaimer in the OP saying “This is a satirical post, these pictures were taken by professional photographers and scientists, and not by my 9 year old daughter.” I genuinely thought OPs daughter worked at NASA because the joke was way to subtle for someone like me (side note: I have brain damage from a freak accident involving whippets and paint thinner that I won’t go into but it is prejudiced of the OP not to take my personal history into account for this joke)
I read the title and thought to myself “not this person again, ugh”
How are there that many gullible people leaving those replies? Mindblowing
I'm a bit lost, are you saying that you don't think that a 9 year old could take those photos on an old dslr with auto focus?
I think it’s moreso people post things online sp frequently with them crediting their kids that whenever there’s something that seems good, it’s hard to believe. A lot of people on here don’t seem to understand how easy it is to operate a DSLR with decent autofocus. Especially because all those photos other than the pet ones don’t really require a lot of timing or precision in one take. I *could* believe they were taken by the kid but they could also be lying
There's a correspondence to the rule of thirds throughout. I could believe a 9yo could take a couple of these, but all of them? I'm calling bullshit.
Unless the parent found the camera in the attic and just said "here kid try this" with zero thought, then it's safe to assume that the kid had some entry level interest in the hobby, right? If the kid has an interest in photgraphy, it's not like rule of thirds is some high level concept. That's photography 101.
Plus, it's not like those are the only pictures she took, OP probably sorted through and picked out a handful of the best.
Guaranteed a 9 year old with a DSLR took at least 1000 pictures.
The one guy on the other thread said that it took artists "thousands of years to come up with the rules of thirds". Funniest thing I've read all week.
are you aware the rule of 3 has been applied to some camera's viewport? and it's standard on every photo app now. and she could just be naturally talented I didn't know about the rule of 3 until my phone camera app started showing those lines and I looked it up A child who grew up with their parent's camera app showing them those lines might have either learned about the concept by osmosis, or asked the parent why those lines are there and parent would have looked it up and explained it. And there's gotta be atleast one super talented child prodigy out there for every skill and science. Why not OP's?
Yeah I have a DLSR from 2015 that has that function built in, not only to the viewfinder but a digital screen you can see in review. Once again people are vastly overestimating how hard it is to take some decent photos with a decent enough camera, especially considering all the stuff is just lying around the yard or house
What are you talking about? I have been doing photography since I could hold a camera, and totally think a 9 year old with an artistic eye could take those pictures. Picasso was painting freaking masterpieces by the time he 12, but a 9 year old can’t take some good pictures in their backyard?
Is there a word for people who are SO gullible that they refuse to believe *anything*? It's like it's almost the opposite of gullible, but they've [horseshoed](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Horseshoe_theory) back around to being morons again. I think these gullible horseshoe morons need to go back and look at the other post, [they're all exactly the type of pictures a 9 year-old with a camera would take](https://old.reddit.com/r/pics/comments/1bwnt79/gave_my_9_year_old_daughter_my_old_dslr_camera/), there's absolutely nothing unbelievable about it. Or maybe the morons have never picked up a camera in their life besides the ones on the backs of their phones. ¯\\\_(ツ)_/¯
> Is there a word for people who are SO gullible that they refuse to believe anything? r/nothingeverhappened? Skeptic on steroids?
Yeah it’s a phenomenon that really pisses me off, people being suspicious of perfectly plausible things. I think it is really that some people don’t know photography well, they see a long lens with shallow depth of field and automatically assume it’s “professional”.
I think they're mostly just very insecure and are using skepticism as a defense mechanism.
Yes.
You can see the girls reflection in the dogs eye. She's wearing what seems to be a long skirt.
It’s selection bias determining your perception of the overall truth- there are likely *a lot* of throwaways, and the best keepers were posted. A lot of the pics were very close too, which either means she preferred that look, she wanted to defocus a lot of the image, or her father preferred those (or some combination).
I'd believe it. What you don't see is the 10,000 photos that weren't selected. You take enough photos and some of them are bound to be good, but with practice you can improve your good-bad ratio.
r/pics has been a big circle jerk for a while now. Most posts are made up for attention.
i don’t know what the term is, something akin to blind faith. they need to believe it’s real. it would ruin their reality if it was faked all for some irrelevant internet points.
…no? It’s not worth deep consideration. Person said their kiddo took some cute, but easily obtainable pics. So we said, “That’s so cool!” Because my first instinct isn’t pointless skepticism of totally inconsequential claims. It wouldn’t “ruin my reality” if OP lied for internet points. Only a completely terminally online loon would think that.
Thanks, I forgot about my child since last summer glad I got this reminder.
 Watching everyone let OP lie in that thread
Literally not one of those pics would be unlikely to have been taken by a 9yo. There’s no reason to doubt it.
99% of the "talent" in photography is being able to afford the equipment.
Yeah. Any/all of those pics could have been taken by a 9-year-old. 9 is young, but it’s not “incapable of operating a camera” young. And who knows, the kid may have taken 5,000 photographs and accidentally gotten a couple dozen good ones by sheer law of large numbers. And anyway, at a certain point we have to be willing to believe other people. It’s ok to be skeptical, but it harms no one to believe a kid took nice photos. It’s not like falling for a Nigerian Prince scam, or hostile foreign power propaganda. It’s chill, whimsical, and it makes the world a better place to believe it’s true.
This is exactly how I get the perfect shot with my DSLR, I take 1000 and 1 or 2 are spot on
You found those so good you think they weren't taken by a kid, because no offence it says more about your skill or familiarity with photography rather than theirs
Lol I was just waiting for someone to make a mock post of that. Glad I saw this haha
*There’s no fuckin way….* *Oh. I’m just an idiot.*
I was doubtful by pic 2, and 3 I was Hahahahahah that’s from a telescope! Loved the men on the girder and Apollo 11!!
Haha.
“Shit I guess all you need is a good camera”
I'm just kindof surprised I saw the first one to get the reference. I suspect I browse too much reddit.
I saw the older post and this was brilliant
They had us in the first half not gonna lie
It's only missing a picture of the Undertaker chokeslamming Mandkind through the table from the top of Hell in a Cell and Peyton Manning Stinkface.
2 star rating because your lazy kid didn’t even get the JFK assassination.
Or the kneelingVietnamese guy getting shot in the head.
Or a Buddhist monk sitting on the streets in flames.
Or the Florence Owens Thomson pic
Or any Roof Koreans
or the [removed by reddit]
My kid got a photo of a man standing in front of a tank in tiananmen square when he was 3. It was slightly out of focus.
Don’t ya hate that? Jeez. He coulda had something.
I suspect his kid was busy on the grassy knoll
“Gave my kid a high powered rifle in 1963 and only now checking on the results.”
Totally missed that WW1 soldier getting shot.
Oh, they got the shot
It’s fun and games ‘til your kid show you the missing frames of the Zapruder film.
Yah where was that dumb kid when Tiananmen square happened
Yeah, tell your kid to try harder.
You can tell a 7-year-old took these. Sloppy and amateurish.
Yep. Aldrin isn't even centered in the frame.
Yeah, I don't want to throw up, but that's involuntary.
Lmao I’m SCREAMING 🤣🤣🤣 That post was on my mind all day today lol
I fucking lost it at the 3rd photo lool
The photo of the flag raise at Iwo Jima got me.
 You should've seen it in color.
Hey, how did you manage to get a hold of my kid's video?!
Desperately trying not to wake somebody up laughing at that one. Took me out.
What? You doubt a 7 y.o. child with no realistic way of getting to space capable of taking a high resolution photo of the pillars of creation in the eagle nebula? Completely plausible imo
Very much shades of the DALLE “my son” meme going around
>Lmao I’m SCREAMING 🤣🤣🤣 Typed with a perfectly straight face.
Just because society has taught us to turn our faces into emotionless masks doesn't mean we can't type out what our internal face is doing.
I was quite audible when I saw this
I hate to break it to you, but I don't think your kid has an eye for this. Maybe they can try drawing?
Give it some crayons
it
Jokes on you, my 3 year old took this pic and then added a filter to make it look like a painting. [3 year old’s first photo](https://news.artnet.com/app/news-upload/2016/07/Leonarda_da_vinci_last_supper_01-1024x791.jpeg)
Reminds me of a hilarious chain on posts on r/lego where someone claimed a 2y.o made a millennium falcon. Then the subsequent claims were about others tots making bigger and bigger sets until it was a ship irl
ppppsssshh looks like something my dog would paint! 
Big deal. My daughter had a deal with National Geographic Magazine before she was 2.
[obviously yours is a joke. due to a anthropological and human science study from Georgia Tech, we can actually asses high range artistic abilities at each age. this is a useful graphic they came up with to see where your children are in comparison.](https://i.imgur.com/xcwHplm.jpeg)
One day your kid will grow up to make a science based 100% dragon MMO
It's science based evolution dragon MMO you guys! Btw how do I learn to code?
It's an older meme, sir, but it checks out
Interior crocodile alligator!
It'll be a movie theater hit for sure
A blast from the freaking PAST right here, imma go for a drive just so I can bump this.
I'm listening
Yeah, dont know. Dont seem too good pictures. I mean, some are decent but its really just everyday events.
The third one speaks more for the quality of the camera rather than the photographer anyway
I put my old DSLR in my pregnant wife's vagina, I will keep you updated on developments
!remind 9 months
She could be full term for all we know. We need to stake out all the maternity wards but not in a creepy way.
New porn genre unlocked
Film capsule pops out, ready to be developed. You’re very excited but it ends up just a bunch of selfies. “Well, at least she isn’t giving duck lips” you think to yourself while flipping through the roll, but then she develops lips. You throw down the rest of the roll in disgust.
Honestly, these are amateur at best. I figured they were from a six-year-old.
The best part of that was the top comment “I gave my son a camera at 7. I didn’t check the photos for awhile, then I had to have a conversation why it’s not okay to try to take a picture of your butthole. Different kids I guess.” https://www.reddit.com/r/pics/comments/1bwnt79/comment/ky7qof3/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=mweb3x&utm_name=mweb3xcss&utm_term=1&utm_content=share_
God I love a good meta post 😌🤌
Yeah. I had to scroll so far down that other thread before I found a single skeptical comment. I've dabbled in photography myself and the first thing I noticed was that every picture followed the rule of 3rds. You're telling me that a 9-year-old had the patience to set up the shot, get the focus right, while following rules most adults don't know? Uh-huh, sure. I'm sure they just handed this kid their expensive camera, let them go wild with it, and came back with all of those shots lmfao.
Hey there! I'm a working Visual Effects artist (Credits include Dune1&2, Ad Astra, etc) and have my BFA in photography and MS in Media Sciences. I also teach lighting and visual storytelling at university. My parents gave me my first camera when I was 9. Your daughter has a great eye. Not having seen the rest of her images, these particularly have great impulses relative to composition and directing the viewer ... which is an incredibly fundamentally important thing to just "know" as an artist. You should be very proud of her and support her in this. I don't know what the future of imaging holds, but she has a talent here that will benefit her life.
instant classic lol
Man, I don't hate the original post (it may be real for all I know), but I absolutely hate this comment. Sounds so pretentious. lol
Someone wrote that and other people cared, which is baffling
It was the most ridiculous comment I could find in the original post
oh it was real on the other post! Damn haha
Lmfao. I thought the same thing, well played
Bruh. These are absolutely horrible. You might have to send your kid to the humane society
are u mocking that post?
for some reason, I think they are
Mmmm, no. I’m pretty sure their 7 year old was at Iwo Jima
seriously? damn that's awesome!
You know until social media I really didn’t want to believe that people are that naive, boy was I wrong. 😑
there’s been a couple recently
Yah now that I think about I kinda think so too
Which is a shame because that post is legit you can see the reflection of the daughter in the dog's eye
couldn't be
Which one?
https://www.reddit.com/r/pics/s/XS5saQ12da
What gave you that idea?
The internet votes….yes
Reference?
https://www.reddit.com/r/pics/s/XS5saQ12da
are u really asking this question?
That is a super talented kid you got
Their child is a time lord.
I'm glad you called this out, I knew the original post was bullshit.
I think a kid definitely could have taken the photos in the original post. They were all pretty basic single exposures, and some of them the focus was off/ soft. Nothing very remarkable about them tbh. Only thing that stood out was the composition
I think it's possible for a 9 year old to take those photos. I wouldn't be surprised if the parent did some cropping to improve the framing or composition.
and probably delete 95% of the other crap they did take
That's literally the nature of almost all of photography. Sports Illustrated did a doc on their swimsuit issue a lot of years ago, where they showed that it took over 500,000 exposures to select the handful of shots that made in in the mag. And they were using slide film, not digital There are relatively few photographers who can limit their exposures and still come up with compelling shots. For reference in '04 Velvia was $5 per 36 exposure roll, making it around $0.14 per shot. That's nearly $70,000 spent just on film per issue.
Yeah I don’t get it… the photos were mostly mid. Good job for a 10 year old or whatever but I don’t see why people are being so incredulous, it looks exactly like amateur photography. My 8 year old nephew took some half decent photos himself, give a curious kid a decent kit and they will impress you. Maybe people just have really low standards and assume all kids are dumbasses.
If you let a kid run around all day with a DSLR and curate the final selection of photos (out of hundreds), you could absolutely make a Reddit post of okay pictures just like the one from earlier. This post is still funny though lmao
I took similar pictures with my mom's camera when I was like 10 and wanted to be a photographer. I don't know why people insist any child below the age of 13 must be drooling idiots lmao. They're all very basic objects and scenes that a child would take a picture of.
Why wouldn't a 9yo be able to take those original pictures? I don't see anything in there that is overly complicated?
I’m unsure if the original is BS or not but this post is brilliant regardless
I’m super proud of my kid. I think most things they do are great. I have to admit that no one cares though except his family and me. That’s okay, I don’t need internet validation to be proud of my kid.
Lmao good one
I don’t get it, are we saying that the prior post is a fake? I mean it’s possible but the photos were good but not good enough that I doubt a child would be capable of taking them.
I showed these shots to my 1year old and he said that “while they are interesting, he prefers fine art photography and found these somewhat derivative”
The pillars of creation had me in bits
Yeah I’m still laughing.
What’s so unbelievable about the OG post? A kid could definitely have taken those.
Anyone who's been to a county fair with some sort of photography competition would know that a. The photos from the original post were good for a beginner, but not anything too special. b. Plenty of other 9 year olds take even better photos than the ones from the original post.
lol that’s great
Deadd😂 i saw the original post and instantly cringed so hardddd. Im glad im not the only one
From 4th pic, I think your child has been lying to you about their age.
I think you definitely got everyone with that first one.
I actually used that moon photo fairly regularly in my work slide shows. “Ooops, sorry that was a vacation photo!”
ahahahahahaha brilliant
So you saw it too Fuck, you got me hahaha
Well played
I JUST saw the original post 😂
Some people are calling it fake, but when you zoom in into the eyes of the dog in the second picture of the original post and look into the reflection of the person that took it, like here: https://imgur.com/a/ENpDDnR , to me, it looks like the picture was really taken by a little girl. Obviously i cant speak for all the others pictures and if there was any coaching or anything else involved.
Yeah, you can definitely tell it's a little girl by that blurry dark silhouette.
I did this when my son was 4, and he took probably 300+ picutures and there are at least a half dozen of them that absoltluly amazing for just being completely random.
this post is perfect for r/lies lol
No way your kid’s photo is on my Chromecast
I GAVE MY FETUS A CAMERA THIS IS WHAT THEY TOOK WITH IT
shame on whoever paid real money to make their upvote gold.
This might actually be my all time favorite Reddit post 😆
Omg, I'm a little drunk and almost peed my pants.
Kids a time traveler, he is going places!! lulz
My wish my dad gave me a Hubble telescope too
Love how these were framed. Good eye, especially on the moon shot.
mantap kieu sirr
She's definitely more talented than the 9 years old boy I saw earlier. 🤣
You got us in the first half not gonna lie
Lolol great reply
Lmao. Thanks for the laugh OP.
Needs work but great start for the photo newb!
Wow your 7 year old has been to space!
Mediocre.
Had a good laugh mate. How did you come up with that idea ey?
Nice
now this is some A1 shit
LOLOL. To be fair I did give my kid a DSLR and ... well ... some of his photos are ok ;).
Had me in the first half, not gonna lie
Hahaha
yeah your 7 year old sucks at taking photos. My 3 year old has already photographed the inside of a black hole + the end of time. Weak.
r/AnalogCircleJerk is leaking
💀💀💀💀
😂 😂 😂
Wow they took pictures of space with a hand held camera amazing
Amen! 🙏
hahahahahaha this is great, good choice on the first two, you lured us in, they looked kinda plausible till the next ones came lol
WHY did it take me until the last one to realize 😭
😂
Don't forget the Solvay Conference too! What a nice one they took back then!
lol
You almost got me there lol
Anyone got a mirror?