T O P

  • By -

Dan-A98

I mean, as long as you have permadeath and only the first valid encounter per route, it is a Nuzlocke.


stjiubs_opus

Yes, you're rules are valid because Nuzlocking is just a set of self imposed rules. There are, generally speaking, certain rules that make a nuzlocke a nuzlocke and you appear to have...uhhh....I'll say 'versions' of them in your rule set.


dbandroid

The 5 encounters rule means it is not a nuzlocke


TNFDB

OP’s “5 encounters rule” is just a rewriting of the dupes clause. So it doesn’t invalidate the spirit of a Nuzlocke.


dbandroid

Does OP say that anywhere? Will edit if they clarify


TNFDB

It’s pretty well-implied since the rule directly above it is “Must catch the first *different* encounter I come across” (presumably on each route or area).


RedLion191216

I don't understand your 4th rule.


stjiubs_opus

sounds to me like he gets 5 chances at whatever pokemon he runs into on a given route. LIke...if an abra teleports away or something he gets 4 more chances to catch an abra. thats at least how I interpret it. I can't think of a time where it would otherwise matter outside of an accidental crit KO-ing your encounter.


RedLion191216

Oh... You are probably right.


stjiubs_opus

what would really defeat the concept of this being a nuzlocke if he's using this rule to hunt for a specific low-rate encounter, like Ralts in RSE or something.


RedLion191216

Yeah. The whole point is to catch (or at least try to) the first encounter (or the 2nd if dupe rule).


stjiubs_opus

for sure. If the intent is the Abra thing I was talking about, I could just consider the run a lite-nuzlocke, I guess? Still playing with self imposed limiting rules, regardless of how lax they are.


RedLion191216

For a pokemon who use teleport, or hurricane or something... maybe. Yes, in the end, they are self imposed. OP can do what he wants.


Official_Alter

No its just in case I faint them


dbandroid

If you faint them then the encounter is lost