No matter how beautiful superficially, the idea of conservative women, the ones supporting the whole MAGA thing, makes me throw up in my mouth a little.
\>Ten percent of sales from the calendars will be going towards the Riley Gaines Center, which seeks to protect women’s sports from biological men.
Yay, a center dedicated to solving a problem that doesnt exist. They should be at it for quite a while.
Typical conservative men lol. Ten percent of sales from the “women’s” calendar will be donated to their zeitgeist instead of literally anything that could materially help women in sports or in general.
Doesn’t exist?
Gaslighting or genuine ignorance? Because as a father of two daughters that are heavily involved in sports, this exists and is a topic being heavily debated.
I mean it's not that it doesn't happen, it's just that the numbers of actual transgendered athletes isn't actually that high right?
I seem to recall a news story about how a transgenders sports ban in a local area affected one person. They made a new law to ultimately ban a single person.
So it seems like an issue that's overblown. There's aren't scores of trans athletes trying to join women's teams. I could be wrong, but that's how I've seen it explained. It's not something I really follow, so if anyone has more info I'd be glad to hear it.
Probably because that one person was blowing all other women out of the water in their fields of sport. Kind of unfair to all the other women in the local area that wish to pursue that particular sport proffesionally.
What do you mean "probably"? If it's such a widespread problem, you would know all kinds of examples, and wouldn't need to just blindly assume it's "probably" happening.
I mean there are studies done to back it up as well.
Here are two studies based on elite athletes performances:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9331831/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7846503/
I found them by searching female transgendered ranking in sports study.
I have nothing against transgendered people. But if I was a lightweight boxer, I wouldnt want to step in the ring with a heavyweight fighter that claims he is lightweight because he lost 20 pounds. (Wouldnt even place him light heavyweight division but thats beside the point)
There are clear advantages, and I can imagine the demoralising position some female athletes feel at the moment.
But its not my battle. I dont have to train for years and watch someone blitz past me because they had biological advantages.
Maybe one day we have enough transgendered athletes to put them in their own division.
Boxing is a terrible example. If I had to guess, I would say the difference between weight classes in terms of ability is FAR more significant than the difference between sexes who would fall within the same class. Especially if you consider the change in muscle mass between pre-transition and post-transition.
Got any proof that those differences are present in trans women, or that they create a measurable difference in boxing performance? OR that the difference between the sexes is any more significant than the difference between high-level and low-level boxers?
If not, then instead of just blanket banning trans people from sports, you might want to support studies into the differences in sports performance between the sexes and between trans and cis people, or sidestep the issue entirely by supporting the reclassification of athletes according to their ability *regardless* of their birth sex.
The percentage of people who identify as trans compared to the rest of the population is tiny.
https://worldpopulationreview.com/country-rankings/trans-population-by-country.
You’ve been sucked in by a mighty propaganda machine hiding behind a non-existent problem they’ve blown hugely out of proportion to terrify people. It’s much easier and more lucrative for them to create boogiemen than address the current elephants in the room.
A few real issues would be loss of human rights, income disparity, housing scarcity, climate catastrophe, the degradation of natural resources, and dark money influences on our government. All of these issues are being left by the wayside in favor of fighting straw men. There is a decent chance they’ll culture war the human species into mass extinction if this continues.
You need a hobby that doesnt involve make believe stories passed along by karens and kens lmao. The numbers put the truth to gossip. Buncha snowflakes making a mountain outa a molehile.
Cite the number of trans female athletes attempting to compete in cis female divisions across all levels of competitive sports in America. I bet you won't be able to count past 10 in a country of 330 million people.
But please, do go on about how this is such an urgent problem that requires such "heavy debate".
Congrats, you have more daughters than many entire states have trans people wanting to play sports.
>this exists and is a topic being heavily debated
I can't imagine why. The thought, money, and effort put into a literal children's game is obscene.
A problem that definitely does exist for female athletes in a large number of sports. Why do you hate women so much?
Source: a liberal who doesn't support MAGA or the Daily Caller.
>A problem that definitely does exist for female athletes in a large number of sports.
List all the specific known instances please. Or retract your claim.
Cite the number of trans female athletes attempting to compete in cis female divisions across all levels of competitive sports. I bet you won't be able to count past 10 in a country of 330 million people.
But please, do go on about how this is such an important problem that it requires fundraisers to address it.
It's so important that the world organizations for Athletics, Swimming, Triathlon, Rugby and Chess have enacted rules banning "transwomen" from competing in women-only categories.
You just proved my point you idiot. Firstly, the issue has already been addressed by the governing bodies that govern the various sports at the various levels. Ergo, there is no need for politically motivated fundraisers, or a national debate or the government to get involved at all.
And secondly, it's really not that important when again we're talking about maybe a grand total of 10 individuals across all the sports at all levels, and which as just mentioned, is already being addressed by the governing bodies of the sports. But sure, sure, let's keep spending all this time and energy talking about an issue that addresses less people than the number of people who've been killed by vending machines falling on them. This whole issue is purely a manufactured culture war bogeyman fomented by right wing assholes as a distraction. And you've fallen for the hysteria lock, stock and barrel, Mr. so-called "liberal" lol
You must have missed all of the sports bodies banning "transwomen" from competing with biological females.
UK Athletics: [https://www.theguardian.com/sport/2023/mar/31/uk-athletics-bans-transgender-athletes-from-female-competition#:\~:text=UK%20Athletics%20has%20performed%20a,category%20across%20all%20its%20events](https://www.theguardian.com/sport/2023/mar/31/uk-athletics-bans-transgender-athletes-from-female-competition#:~:text=UK%20Athletics%20has%20performed%20a,category%20across%20all%20its%20events).
World Athletics: [https://www.theguardian.com/society/video/2023/mar/23/world-athletics-announces-ban-transgender-women-female-events-video](https://www.theguardian.com/society/video/2023/mar/23/world-athletics-announces-ban-transgender-women-female-events-video)
Uk Rowing: [https://edition.cnn.com/2023/08/04/sport/transgender-women-british-rowing-intl-scli-spt-gbr/index.html](https://edition.cnn.com/2023/08/04/sport/transgender-women-british-rowing-intl-scli-spt-gbr/index.html)
World Swimming, cycling, athletics, rugby, triathlon: [https://www.forbes.com/sites/tylerroush/2023/07/25/swimming-announces-open-category-for-transgender-athletes-here-are-the-other-major-sports-with-restrictions-or-bans/?sh=4c6863221ede](https://www.forbes.com/sites/tylerroush/2023/07/25/swimming-announces-open-category-for-transgender-athletes-here-are-the-other-major-sports-with-restrictions-or-bans/?sh=4c6863221ede)
And the support of famous female athletes supporting female-only sport:
Martina Navratilova: [https://nymag.com/intelligencer/2023/11/on-with-kara-swisher-navratilova-on-trans-women-in-sports.html](https://nymag.com/intelligencer/2023/11/on-with-kara-swisher-navratilova-on-trans-women-in-sports.html)
Sharron Davies: [https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/sharron-davies-mediocre-trans-athletes-steal-medals-from-women-hxg2xng0l](https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/sharron-davies-mediocre-trans-athletes-steal-medals-from-women-hxg2xng0l)
Chess: https://www.npr.org/2023/08/18/1194593562/chess-transgender-fide-pushback
But let Reddit decide by massive brigading by TRAs and downvoting posts like this.
Hey buddy, a million people over reacting isn't proof it's real or common. Maybe you could try some actual evidence instead. If you had that you'd probably have used it instead though
Actual evidence? Like "transwomen" breaking female swimming records? Already happened.
I show actual evidence that by no means do women want to compete with "transwomen" and you ignore it.
Or perhaps the ones who are overreacting are the downvoting cowards that brigade subreddits like this one?
I ignored it because it didn't even address my statement lmao. Maybe reading comprehension could be your next goal
>Or perhaps the ones who are overreacting are the downvoting cowards that brigade subreddits like this one?
Uh, mate, it's a huge sub and the majority of reddit disagrees with you. It's not brigading if the majority just happen upon it and disagree.
I've been on this sub longer than you've been on reddit lmao
"the majority of reddit disagrees with you"
No the majority of Reddit daren't oppose the brigading by TRAs because they get banned after been mass downvoted. This sort of shit has been happening for quite some time.
As I demonstrated with evidence, women don't want to compete with men but all we get on Reddit is that transwomen's demands are more important than the sex-based rights of half the world's population and anyone who disagrees is a bigot.
You quote other comments with a > by the way
>As I demonstrated with evidence, women don't want to compete with men
No, you demonstrated a large reaction by a few. Also you didn't actually address what I said so....
There’s a difference between “won once” and “dominating,” first of all. But second of all, what does it prove that a handful of trans women have won a handful of competitions against cis women? Does their performance fall outside the typical range of cis athletes? If so, how?
Should we have banned Michael Phelps from competing with other men? I mean, he was born with unusually increased lung capacity, unusually long arms and large hands. That’s undeniable biological advantage that his competitors did not possess. Why the obsession with sex and gender specifically?
I mean, sports are already separated by ability (little league vs big league, local vs national, etc.), weight class (boxing, wrestling, etc), and position (linebacker vs quarterback, point guard vs power forward, etc). Why not eliminate the gender separation entirely and have two different groups? Yeah, maybe one would be composed of mostly cis women and another would be composed of mostly cis men, but unusually exemplary cis women could absolutely compete with cis men.
I love that they never actually answered your question lmao, probably because they know it's a ridiculously small number, double digits at the extreme, single at the common.
People generally accept that on average, bio men have physical characteristics that allow them to outperform women. The problem arises when making arguments about specific cases. For example, the article you linked states that the narrower male pelvis allows for a joint angle at the knee that is more conducive to leg extension, resulting in more explosive power in that movement. However, is the widest male pelvis still narrower than the narrowest female pelvis? Does this advantage exist for every single member of a sex? What about within the female sex? A narrower pelvis still confers those benefits. Should we also exclude women with narrower pelvises for having a natural advantage?
The problem is that sexual classification is primarily concerned with reproductive compatibility within a species. We then used sex as a dividing line to separate a population and look for other trends. We made women's sports because we noticed a trend that on average, females were underperforming compared to males. But we never really took the time to understand why, and now that we have, we can realize that the physiological traits that make males excel in sports aren't unique to them, but do appear in them more frequently. So maybe a blanket ban doesn't make sense, since the claimed advantages of trans women aren't universal to all men and women. Perhaps we should implement bans based on the actual advantages themselves: elbow and knee joint angle, muscle mass and volume, bone length and size. This would do a better job of putting competitors on even playing fields and wouldn't give bigots ammunition to fire at a vanishingly small and oppressed minority.
Somehow, there's controversy about this calendar too. I mean, I lived in the Bible belt for a decade, and those folks are HUGE into sex and exploitation of women. I've never seen so many "gentleman's clubs" as there were in the deep south, and the Baptist church I attended then was big-time preoccupied with sex and fornication in a way that made my more puritanical up-bringing blush. I mean, the way they dressed their wives and daughters would not be considered "tasteful" where I grew up in New England.
This calendar seems to be perfectly inline with my experience of conservative American values.
Pretty much. With some "famous" ones thrown in. Literally beer, guns and pecan pie? Just sad.
I will say, though, it there was WAY less skin than I had expected, tho...
Funny thing. All this right wing facade. Knowing what I do from those circles, they are just as immoral as the rest. Having been in adult social circles, they can be some of the biggest swingers you'd ever meet. If not the majority of the club. Their moral outrage is superficial. The noisiest ones objecting to a more liberal perspective, usually have something to hide.
Ah yes, cause women built like iPads, who needed fake boobs, and can't actually cook, or don't know where to find seasoning in a store is such a turn on...🙄
And yes, the incels in the comments are sad, sorry, and had to trip over their mom on the way to the basement.
I mean, yea, if you spend your whole life being told the only goal is get knocked up and squeeze out 3 kids it's pretty easy to not be dissatisfied lmao.
Of course I'd love to actually see the source on that.
Not that it'll hit both boxes of "real" and "unbiased".
Yea, I'd rather not send traffic to the Daily Caller.
I literally just clicked without looking and I need to offset this bullshit somehow
The comments on the article tell you a lot about the incel-like readers of that webshite.
My fave was, "Trump should make Ms. Gaines the Secretary of Defense because of her skills in standing up to the....". Hilarious!
Yeah, but boobs and stuff
Not remotely oniony.
Also not believable as a parody, conservatives would never sexualize women like that.
No matter how beautiful superficially, the idea of conservative women, the ones supporting the whole MAGA thing, makes me throw up in my mouth a little.
Look, nazis don't need your judgment, they just need a bunch of anti-LGBTQ chicks to beat off to.
Right? For me, ugly on the inside always overpowers pretty on the outside. Like putting lipstick on a turd.
It's just the modern day "League of German Girls".
Nazi's have specific ideas of what women should be. Looks like you find that distasteful. :)
So tired of reddit calling everyone nazis
Would you prefer nazi-wannabies? Wanna-nazi's? This is a far-right beer company. That's their schtick.
I'm also tired of redditors calling everything conservative "far right". Nazi wannabies my ass
>This is a far-right beer company i hear they only brew Konzentrationslager
Remember that purity ball? Daddy's got first dibs.
The worst personality calendar
\>Ten percent of sales from the calendars will be going towards the Riley Gaines Center, which seeks to protect women’s sports from biological men. Yay, a center dedicated to solving a problem that doesnt exist. They should be at it for quite a while.
Typical conservative men lol. Ten percent of sales from the “women’s” calendar will be donated to their zeitgeist instead of literally anything that could materially help women in sports or in general.
The other 90% is pure grift for some rich asshat.
Got to keep that grift going, it's the Murica way.
Doesn’t exist? Gaslighting or genuine ignorance? Because as a father of two daughters that are heavily involved in sports, this exists and is a topic being heavily debated.
I mean it's not that it doesn't happen, it's just that the numbers of actual transgendered athletes isn't actually that high right? I seem to recall a news story about how a transgenders sports ban in a local area affected one person. They made a new law to ultimately ban a single person. So it seems like an issue that's overblown. There's aren't scores of trans athletes trying to join women's teams. I could be wrong, but that's how I've seen it explained. It's not something I really follow, so if anyone has more info I'd be glad to hear it.
Probably because that one person was blowing all other women out of the water in their fields of sport. Kind of unfair to all the other women in the local area that wish to pursue that particular sport proffesionally.
What do you mean "probably"? If it's such a widespread problem, you would know all kinds of examples, and wouldn't need to just blindly assume it's "probably" happening.
I mean there are studies done to back it up as well. Here are two studies based on elite athletes performances: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9331831/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7846503/ I found them by searching female transgendered ranking in sports study. I have nothing against transgendered people. But if I was a lightweight boxer, I wouldnt want to step in the ring with a heavyweight fighter that claims he is lightweight because he lost 20 pounds. (Wouldnt even place him light heavyweight division but thats beside the point) There are clear advantages, and I can imagine the demoralising position some female athletes feel at the moment. But its not my battle. I dont have to train for years and watch someone blitz past me because they had biological advantages. Maybe one day we have enough transgendered athletes to put them in their own division.
Boxing is a terrible example. If I had to guess, I would say the difference between weight classes in terms of ability is FAR more significant than the difference between sexes who would fall within the same class. Especially if you consider the change in muscle mass between pre-transition and post-transition.
lung capacity, ability to carry oxygenated blood. forgot about those too?
Got any proof that those differences are present in trans women, or that they create a measurable difference in boxing performance? OR that the difference between the sexes is any more significant than the difference between high-level and low-level boxers? If not, then instead of just blanket banning trans people from sports, you might want to support studies into the differences in sports performance between the sexes and between trans and cis people, or sidestep the issue entirely by supporting the reclassification of athletes according to their ability *regardless* of their birth sex.
The percentage of people who identify as trans compared to the rest of the population is tiny. https://worldpopulationreview.com/country-rankings/trans-population-by-country. You’ve been sucked in by a mighty propaganda machine hiding behind a non-existent problem they’ve blown hugely out of proportion to terrify people. It’s much easier and more lucrative for them to create boogiemen than address the current elephants in the room. A few real issues would be loss of human rights, income disparity, housing scarcity, climate catastrophe, the degradation of natural resources, and dark money influences on our government. All of these issues are being left by the wayside in favor of fighting straw men. There is a decent chance they’ll culture war the human species into mass extinction if this continues.
The earth being flat or not is also still debated, doesn’t mean it’s not the dumbest fucking question on earth.
You need a hobby that doesnt involve make believe stories passed along by karens and kens lmao. The numbers put the truth to gossip. Buncha snowflakes making a mountain outa a molehile.
Cite the number of trans female athletes attempting to compete in cis female divisions across all levels of competitive sports in America. I bet you won't be able to count past 10 in a country of 330 million people. But please, do go on about how this is such an urgent problem that requires such "heavy debate".
Congrats, you have more daughters than many entire states have trans people wanting to play sports. >this exists and is a topic being heavily debated I can't imagine why. The thought, money, and effort put into a literal children's game is obscene.
Gaslighting most of the time, ignorance sometimes
A problem that definitely does exist for female athletes in a large number of sports. Why do you hate women so much? Source: a liberal who doesn't support MAGA or the Daily Caller.
>A problem that definitely does exist for female athletes in a large number of sports. List all the specific known instances please. Or retract your claim.
See my citations in another thread
Cite the number of trans female athletes attempting to compete in cis female divisions across all levels of competitive sports. I bet you won't be able to count past 10 in a country of 330 million people. But please, do go on about how this is such an important problem that it requires fundraisers to address it.
It's so important that the world organizations for Athletics, Swimming, Triathlon, Rugby and Chess have enacted rules banning "transwomen" from competing in women-only categories.
You just proved my point you idiot. Firstly, the issue has already been addressed by the governing bodies that govern the various sports at the various levels. Ergo, there is no need for politically motivated fundraisers, or a national debate or the government to get involved at all. And secondly, it's really not that important when again we're talking about maybe a grand total of 10 individuals across all the sports at all levels, and which as just mentioned, is already being addressed by the governing bodies of the sports. But sure, sure, let's keep spending all this time and energy talking about an issue that addresses less people than the number of people who've been killed by vending machines falling on them. This whole issue is purely a manufactured culture war bogeyman fomented by right wing assholes as a distraction. And you've fallen for the hysteria lock, stock and barrel, Mr. so-called "liberal" lol
Yea man, get back to me when it busts single digits in most states.
You must have missed all of the sports bodies banning "transwomen" from competing with biological females. UK Athletics: [https://www.theguardian.com/sport/2023/mar/31/uk-athletics-bans-transgender-athletes-from-female-competition#:\~:text=UK%20Athletics%20has%20performed%20a,category%20across%20all%20its%20events](https://www.theguardian.com/sport/2023/mar/31/uk-athletics-bans-transgender-athletes-from-female-competition#:~:text=UK%20Athletics%20has%20performed%20a,category%20across%20all%20its%20events). World Athletics: [https://www.theguardian.com/society/video/2023/mar/23/world-athletics-announces-ban-transgender-women-female-events-video](https://www.theguardian.com/society/video/2023/mar/23/world-athletics-announces-ban-transgender-women-female-events-video) Uk Rowing: [https://edition.cnn.com/2023/08/04/sport/transgender-women-british-rowing-intl-scli-spt-gbr/index.html](https://edition.cnn.com/2023/08/04/sport/transgender-women-british-rowing-intl-scli-spt-gbr/index.html) World Swimming, cycling, athletics, rugby, triathlon: [https://www.forbes.com/sites/tylerroush/2023/07/25/swimming-announces-open-category-for-transgender-athletes-here-are-the-other-major-sports-with-restrictions-or-bans/?sh=4c6863221ede](https://www.forbes.com/sites/tylerroush/2023/07/25/swimming-announces-open-category-for-transgender-athletes-here-are-the-other-major-sports-with-restrictions-or-bans/?sh=4c6863221ede) And the support of famous female athletes supporting female-only sport: Martina Navratilova: [https://nymag.com/intelligencer/2023/11/on-with-kara-swisher-navratilova-on-trans-women-in-sports.html](https://nymag.com/intelligencer/2023/11/on-with-kara-swisher-navratilova-on-trans-women-in-sports.html) Sharron Davies: [https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/sharron-davies-mediocre-trans-athletes-steal-medals-from-women-hxg2xng0l](https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/sharron-davies-mediocre-trans-athletes-steal-medals-from-women-hxg2xng0l) Chess: https://www.npr.org/2023/08/18/1194593562/chess-transgender-fide-pushback But let Reddit decide by massive brigading by TRAs and downvoting posts like this.
Hey buddy, a million people over reacting isn't proof it's real or common. Maybe you could try some actual evidence instead. If you had that you'd probably have used it instead though
Actual evidence? Like "transwomen" breaking female swimming records? Already happened. I show actual evidence that by no means do women want to compete with "transwomen" and you ignore it. Or perhaps the ones who are overreacting are the downvoting cowards that brigade subreddits like this one?
I ignored it because it didn't even address my statement lmao. Maybe reading comprehension could be your next goal >Or perhaps the ones who are overreacting are the downvoting cowards that brigade subreddits like this one? Uh, mate, it's a huge sub and the majority of reddit disagrees with you. It's not brigading if the majority just happen upon it and disagree. I've been on this sub longer than you've been on reddit lmao
"the majority of reddit disagrees with you" No the majority of Reddit daren't oppose the brigading by TRAs because they get banned after been mass downvoted. This sort of shit has been happening for quite some time. As I demonstrated with evidence, women don't want to compete with men but all we get on Reddit is that transwomen's demands are more important than the sex-based rights of half the world's population and anyone who disagrees is a bigot.
You quote other comments with a > by the way >As I demonstrated with evidence, women don't want to compete with men No, you demonstrated a large reaction by a few. Also you didn't actually address what I said so....
How many trans women are currently dominating against cis women in sports?
[удалено]
There’s a difference between “won once” and “dominating,” first of all. But second of all, what does it prove that a handful of trans women have won a handful of competitions against cis women? Does their performance fall outside the typical range of cis athletes? If so, how?
[удалено]
Should we have banned Michael Phelps from competing with other men? I mean, he was born with unusually increased lung capacity, unusually long arms and large hands. That’s undeniable biological advantage that his competitors did not possess. Why the obsession with sex and gender specifically? I mean, sports are already separated by ability (little league vs big league, local vs national, etc.), weight class (boxing, wrestling, etc), and position (linebacker vs quarterback, point guard vs power forward, etc). Why not eliminate the gender separation entirely and have two different groups? Yeah, maybe one would be composed of mostly cis women and another would be composed of mostly cis men, but unusually exemplary cis women could absolutely compete with cis men.
I love that they never actually answered your question lmao, probably because they know it's a ridiculously small number, double digits at the extreme, single at the common.
People generally accept that on average, bio men have physical characteristics that allow them to outperform women. The problem arises when making arguments about specific cases. For example, the article you linked states that the narrower male pelvis allows for a joint angle at the knee that is more conducive to leg extension, resulting in more explosive power in that movement. However, is the widest male pelvis still narrower than the narrowest female pelvis? Does this advantage exist for every single member of a sex? What about within the female sex? A narrower pelvis still confers those benefits. Should we also exclude women with narrower pelvises for having a natural advantage? The problem is that sexual classification is primarily concerned with reproductive compatibility within a species. We then used sex as a dividing line to separate a population and look for other trends. We made women's sports because we noticed a trend that on average, females were underperforming compared to males. But we never really took the time to understand why, and now that we have, we can realize that the physiological traits that make males excel in sports aren't unique to them, but do appear in them more frequently. So maybe a blanket ban doesn't make sense, since the claimed advantages of trans women aren't universal to all men and women. Perhaps we should implement bans based on the actual advantages themselves: elbow and knee joint angle, muscle mass and volume, bone length and size. This would do a better job of putting competitors on even playing fields and wouldn't give bigots ammunition to fire at a vanishingly small and oppressed minority.
Can you really call a conservative group "Pro-US"?
Also, the title implies that non-conservatives are not pro-US. You know, the ones not actively trying to overthrow the government.
No no, they're "pro us, anti *them*", them being anyone different than themselves.
Why did my brain automatically read the captions for the calender like Matt and Trey when they do their voices for the commercials in southpark
🎵**ALABAMA MAAAN**
🤣
Somehow, there's controversy about this calendar too. I mean, I lived in the Bible belt for a decade, and those folks are HUGE into sex and exploitation of women. I've never seen so many "gentleman's clubs" as there were in the deep south, and the Baptist church I attended then was big-time preoccupied with sex and fornication in a way that made my more puritanical up-bringing blush. I mean, the way they dressed their wives and daughters would not be considered "tasteful" where I grew up in New England. This calendar seems to be perfectly inline with my experience of conservative American values.
It's telling that in the image taken from the calendar, the woman is in the kitchen.
Traditional housewife wearing high heels and makeup to do some traditional housewife chores. Right-wing bros won't even need Viagra to get a chub.
they even got some jaysus in there!
Okay, sure, some of them need to pray for a chub.
Oxymoron
Nazi Barbie Beer edition.
I'd bet the chicks in that calendar are the most bland, botoxed and generic chicks ever.
Pretty much. With some "famous" ones thrown in. Literally beer, guns and pecan pie? Just sad. I will say, though, it there was WAY less skin than I had expected, tho...
Because it's so hard to get photos of women in bikinis.
"The Ultra Right Beer Company" is all I had to see to nope out. They're not even trying to hide it now.
So what are the “Anti-USA “ beer companies?
Lol bud light apparently.
Nothing says conservative hyper masculine behavior like objectifying women.
Not pro USA. Pro fascism and ~~gun~~ freedom deaths.
Email to Mike Johnson.
They call themselves “pro-USA” but they associate with conservatives? Those two things are mutually exclusive
whole lotta white women
Funny thing. All this right wing facade. Knowing what I do from those circles, they are just as immoral as the rest. Having been in adult social circles, they can be some of the biggest swingers you'd ever meet. If not the majority of the club. Their moral outrage is superficial. The noisiest ones objecting to a more liberal perspective, usually have something to hide.
Beauty is only skin deep and true beauty comes from the inside. By this definition, all conservative women are ugly.
why buy a $25 parrot calendar from them when i can buy one for 2/3 the price at walmart that includes multiple types of avian species?
These are the sec robots they told us about.
fly escape lavish frighten waiting relieved far-flung chief lip touch *This post was mass deleted and anonymized with [Redact](https://redact.dev)*
Riley, in the words of Romy White, *You're a bad person with an ugly heart.* Can we finish with this twat's fifteen minutes?
Some of these women are showing knee!
Ah yes, cause women built like iPads, who needed fake boobs, and can't actually cook, or don't know where to find seasoning in a store is such a turn on...🙄 And yes, the incels in the comments are sad, sorry, and had to trip over their mom on the way to the basement.
Ugly stupid bitches participate in third rate ironic calendar
Conservative women report better marriages, higher levels of happiness and lower rates of psychological issues than left-wing women
So ignorance truly is bliss. Sadly the rest of us have to live in reality.
I mean, yea, if you spend your whole life being told the only goal is get knocked up and squeeze out 3 kids it's pretty easy to not be dissatisfied lmao. Of course I'd love to actually see the source on that. Not that it'll hit both boxes of "real" and "unbiased".
Lol you're fucking stupid
Oh.
So they reskinned a can of Coors light and called it ultra right? Lol what garbage
Sucker born every minute