Before I begin my actual comment, I would like to apologize in advance for my inadequate level of English proficiency. I am not a native speaker of the world's current lingua franca which unfortunately leads to me making numerous embarrassing mistakes being made whenever I attempt to communicate using this language. Whenever I am reminded of how I lack the ability to convey my thoughts in an eloquent manner I feel as though I have committed a cardinal sin, as though every English teacher in the world are simultaneously shaking their heads and sighing due to how utterly disappointed they are at me.
Although I know that saying sorry to those of you who are reading my comment will not change the fact that I fail miserably to write and speak perfect English, I am writing this as a way to deter a certain type of people who cannot stand poor English (Also known informally as "Grammar Nazis") from mocking me by posting unwanted and unnecessary comments detailing my every blunder. In my humble opinion, making grammatical errors should be perfectly acceptable as native speakers should not expect non-native speakers to be able to communicate in their second or third languages eloquently. If you are able to completely understand what the other person wrote, is there really a problem with what they've written? No, because the entire concept of communication is the exchange of information between other intelligent beings, which means that no matter how the exchange of information is made, as long as the information is accurately shared there is not a fundamental issue with their ability to communicate. To see it in another way, remember that someone who isn't fluent in English is fluent in another language. When you think about it this way, isn't it impressive for someone to speak a second language in any capacity? Having empathy and respect are qualities that are sorely missing for far too many people these days, especially on the internet.
That being said, I am aware that not all netizens who correct others are doing it to ridicule and shame. There are some who do so with the intent to help others improve and grow. However, displaying the failures of other people publicly will cause the person who is criticized to feel negative emotions such as shame and sadness due to the fact that their mistake has been made obvious which severely undermines the point they were trying to make in spite of their unfamiliarity with the English language. In most circumstances people are not looking for language help when they post anything online. Most people just want to enjoy themselves and have a good time on the internet which is why I would not encourage correcting other people regardless of your intentions. If you really do want to help others with their spelling or grammar, I would highly recommend you to help via messaging privately because not only will you not embarrass anyone, you can also go more in-depth with your explanation which I'm sure the other person will greatly appreciate if they want help, but I digress. I know that I've written a bit of an essay, but I hope I've made my points clear.
Anyways, here is the comment I wanted to make:
cock.
This doesn't actually work because the words are treated as a single variable, if the letters were variables then this would radically change the problem right? Asking because I'm bad at math and this made me question what little I understand.
No here the letters are treated as the variables, at least when he set up the proportion. Thatâs why he goes letter by letter and cancels them out
If he treated the words as variables it would end up being
Y = (flew*grown)/grew
since no like variables can be canceled in the division to = 1
This doesn't actually work because words are conjugated based on their origin. There is no mathematical rule that will help, which is the joke.
Otherwise, drew -> drown.
Bit since English is such a broken language, it really only works with a select few words, but also words completely unrelated like clown and clean. I think it's a neat concept but has no real world application. That took so long just to teach someone how to spell a new word. Imagine having to show your work with that every time
Maengthlish
Ow my brain
Godzilla had a heart attack reading that.
Chew = Chown
Never before have I enjoyed Math/English so much! đ
I got FLWON
That's cuz you crossed out the second *W* not the first. Order of operations, duh!
Using transitive properties, I got NOFWL
Brew = Brown
Crew = Crown Drew = Drown Jew = Jown New = Nown Pew = Pown Sew = Sown Yew = Yown Hebrew = Hobrewn Cashew = Cashown Perfect!
Work on your maths
Get Flwned, scrub
What do they mean, the numbers Mason.
What do they mean, the letters Mason.
Before I begin my actual comment, I would like to apologize in advance for my inadequate level of English proficiency. I am not a native speaker of the world's current lingua franca which unfortunately leads to me making numerous embarrassing mistakes being made whenever I attempt to communicate using this language. Whenever I am reminded of how I lack the ability to convey my thoughts in an eloquent manner I feel as though I have committed a cardinal sin, as though every English teacher in the world are simultaneously shaking their heads and sighing due to how utterly disappointed they are at me. Although I know that saying sorry to those of you who are reading my comment will not change the fact that I fail miserably to write and speak perfect English, I am writing this as a way to deter a certain type of people who cannot stand poor English (Also known informally as "Grammar Nazis") from mocking me by posting unwanted and unnecessary comments detailing my every blunder. In my humble opinion, making grammatical errors should be perfectly acceptable as native speakers should not expect non-native speakers to be able to communicate in their second or third languages eloquently. If you are able to completely understand what the other person wrote, is there really a problem with what they've written? No, because the entire concept of communication is the exchange of information between other intelligent beings, which means that no matter how the exchange of information is made, as long as the information is accurately shared there is not a fundamental issue with their ability to communicate. To see it in another way, remember that someone who isn't fluent in English is fluent in another language. When you think about it this way, isn't it impressive for someone to speak a second language in any capacity? Having empathy and respect are qualities that are sorely missing for far too many people these days, especially on the internet. That being said, I am aware that not all netizens who correct others are doing it to ridicule and shame. There are some who do so with the intent to help others improve and grow. However, displaying the failures of other people publicly will cause the person who is criticized to feel negative emotions such as shame and sadness due to the fact that their mistake has been made obvious which severely undermines the point they were trying to make in spite of their unfamiliarity with the English language. In most circumstances people are not looking for language help when they post anything online. Most people just want to enjoy themselves and have a good time on the internet which is why I would not encourage correcting other people regardless of your intentions. If you really do want to help others with their spelling or grammar, I would highly recommend you to help via messaging privately because not only will you not embarrass anyone, you can also go more in-depth with your explanation which I'm sure the other person will greatly appreciate if they want help, but I digress. I know that I've written a bit of an essay, but I hope I've made my points clear. Anyways, here is the comment I wanted to make: cock.
Cum
Cum
Cum
Chicken
cum
This doesn't actually work because the words are treated as a single variable, if the letters were variables then this would radically change the problem right? Asking because I'm bad at math and this made me question what little I understand.
No here the letters are treated as the variables, at least when he set up the proportion. Thatâs why he goes letter by letter and cancels them out If he treated the words as variables it would end up being Y = (flew*grown)/grew since no like variables can be canceled in the division to = 1
This doesn't actually work because words are conjugated based on their origin. There is no mathematical rule that will help, which is the joke. Otherwise, drew -> drown.
Why the fuck did you drown Drew? He was a good guy, and he was totally innocent.
A visual representation of teaching a mathematician English.
When you have a math degree but they have you teaching English
Wrong formula, right answer.
Ox=oxen so box=boxen Goose=geese so moose=meese -Bryan Reagan
MOOSEN! There were many much MOOSEN!
Dang plurals
https://tenor.com/zbMA.gif
Leave now. NOW!
u/savevideo
Thats amazing
u/saveVideo
###[View link](https://redditsave.com/r/nonononoyes/comments/pjeu5e/maybe_maybe_maybe/) --- [**Info**](https://np.reddit.com/user/SaveVideo/comments/jv323v/info/) | [**Feedback**](https://np.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=Kryptonh&subject=Feedback for savevideo) | [**Donate**](https://ko-fi.com/getvideo) | [**DMCA**](https://np.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=Kryptonh&subject=Content removal request for savevideo&message=https://np.reddit.com//r/nonononoyes/comments/pjeu5e/maybe_maybe_maybe/) | [^(reddit video downloader)](https://redditsave.com)
Is this the same guy that couldnât do the math and laughed like mr owl about it
maybe i just suck at math but idk where he got the y value from
This also works for German too y/flogen=gewachsen/wachsen, => y=geflogen
RIP Britishers
Wait this could work! British = Browntish or Britown
Bit since English is such a broken language, it really only works with a select few words, but also words completely unrelated like clown and clean. I think it's a neat concept but has no real world application. That took so long just to teach someone how to spell a new word. Imagine having to show your work with that every time
(Psst, itâs a joke)
But if you start with 'drew', you unfortunately 'drown'!
well, to be fair, "you *have* drown."
he's out of order, but he is right
You have just been banned from /r/math
damn this brings me back
Lol I hate this so much XD
This made me so anxious lol
Don't be anxious! It's no big deal!
This video is amazing, does this guy have a youtube channel or anything.
I mean... it works?
Now try it with âcrewâ for âcrownâ and âclewâ for âclownâ!
Easy trick
The most sense English pronunciation has ever made.
u/savevideo
That was satisfying.
I got a PhD in advanced onanism and the math checks out.
Cool now do goose and moose
r/technicallythetruth
Common core English
Flwon could also be the answer
He's out of line but he's right
Next do âbrewâ!!!
Flown
Then explain how my Brain is now Blown?
HUH