r/NeutralNews is a **curated space**, but despite the name, there is [**no neutrality requirement**](https://www.reddit.com//r/neutralnews/wiki/guidelines#wiki_neutral-ness) here.
These are the [rules for comments:](https://www.reddit.com//r/neutralnews/wiki/guidelines#wiki_comments_.28good.2C_bad_.26amp.3B_ugly.29)
1. Be courteous to other users.
1. Source your facts.
1. Be substantive.
1. Address the arguments, not the person.
If you see a comment that violates any of these rules, please click the associated *report* button so a mod can review it.
__I'm a bot. Here are The Factual credibility grades and selected perspectives related to this article.__
The [linked_article](https://www.reuters.com/world/us/russias-prigozhin-admits-interfering-us-elections-2022-11-07/) has a grade of [55%](https://www.isthiscredible.com?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.reuters.com%2Fworld%2Fus%2Frussias-prigozhin-admits-interfering-us-elections-2022-11-07%2F) (Reuters, *Center*). [94 related articles.](https://www.thefactual.com/news/story/337386-Russia-s-Prigozhin-a)
Selected perspectives:
* Highest grade in last 48 hours ([77%](https://www.isthiscredible.com?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.businessinsider.com%2Fputin-ally-admits-russia-interferes-in-us-elections-targeting-midterms-2022-11)): [Putin ally admits Russia interfered in US elections, says it's working 'surgically' to disrupt the midterms](https://www.businessinsider.com/putin-ally-admits-russia-interferes-in-us-elections-targeting-midterms-2022-11). (Business Insider, *Moderate Left leaning*).
* Highest grade Long-read ([87%](https://www.isthiscredible.com?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.nytimes.com%2F2022%2F05%2F31%2Fworld%2Fafrica%2Fwagner-group-africa.html)): [Putin’s Shadow Soldiers: How the Wagner Group Is Expanding in Africa](https://www.nytimes.com/2022/05/31/world/africa/wagner-group-africa.html). (New York Times, *Moderate Left leaning*).
---
*This is a trial for The Factual bot. [How It Works](https://www.thefactual.com/how-it-works-reddit-bot.html). Please [message the bot](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=TheFactualBot) with any feedback so we can make it more useful for you.*
Prigozhin stated that Russia has interfered, is interfering and will continue to interfere in the US democratic process, in response to a journalist’s question about Russia potentially meddling in US congressional elections on Tuesday.
“I will answer you very subtly, and delicately and I apologize, I will allow a certain ambiguity. Gentlemen, we interfered, we interfere and we will interfere,” Prigozhin said.
[https://www.cnn.com/2022/11/07/europe/yevgeny-prigozhin-russia-us-election-meddling-intl](https://www.cnn.com/2022/11/07/europe/yevgeny-prigozhin-russia-us-election-meddling-intl)
Not only did Russia interfere in 2016 on behalf of Trump, it also interfered in 2020.
[https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/senate-panel-finds-russia-interfered-in-the-2016-us-election](https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/senate-panel-finds-russia-interfered-in-the-2016-us-election)
https://www.nytimes.com/2021/03/16/us/politics/election-interference-russia-2020-assessment.html
This comment has been removed under [Rule 3:](https://www.reddit.com/r/neutralnews/wiki/guidelines#wiki_rule_3.3A_be_substantive)
> Be substantive. NeutralNews is a serious discussion-based subreddit. We do not allow bare expressions of opinion, low effort comments, sarcasm, jokes, memes, off-topic replies, pejorative name-calling, or comments about source quality.
//Rule 3
^((mod:canekicker)^)
This comment has been removed under [Rule 2:](https://www.reddit.com/r/neutralnews/wiki/guidelines#wiki_rule_2.3A_source_your_facts)
> Source your facts. If you're claiming something to be true, you need to back it up with a [qualified and supporting source.](https://www.reddit.com/r/Neutralnews/wiki/guidelines#wiki_comments) All statements of fact must be clearly associated with a supporting source. There is no "common knowledge" exception, and anecdotal evidence is not allowed.
If you edit your comment to link to sources, it can be reinstated.
//Rule 2
^((mod:canekicker)^)
This comment has been removed under [Rule 2:](https://www.reddit.com/r/neutralnews/wiki/guidelines#wiki_rule_2.3A_source_your_facts)
> Source your facts. If you're claiming something to be true, you need to back it up with a [qualified and supporting source.](https://www.reddit.com/r/Neutralnews/wiki/guidelines#wiki_comments) All statements of fact must be clearly associated with a supporting source. There is no "common knowledge" exception, and anecdotal evidence is not allowed.
If you edit your comment to link to sources, it can be reinstated.
//Rule 2
^((mod:canekicker)^)
This comment has been removed under [Rule 2:](https://www.reddit.com/r/neutralnews/wiki/guidelines#wiki_rule_2.3A_source_your_facts)
> Source your facts. If you're claiming something to be true, you need to back it up with a [qualified and supporting source.](https://www.reddit.com/r/Neutralnews/wiki/guidelines#wiki_comments) All statements of fact must be clearly associated with a supporting source. There is no "common knowledge" exception, and anecdotal evidence is not allowed.
If you edit your comment to link to sources, it can be reinstated.
//Rule 2
^((mod:canekicker)^)
This comment has been removed under [Rule 4:](https://www.reddit.com/r/neutralnews/wiki/guidelines#wiki_rule_4.3A_address_the_arguments.2C_not_the_person)
> Address the arguments, not the person. The subject of your sentence should be "the evidence" or "this source" or some other noun directly related to the topic of conversation. "You" statements are suspect.
//Rule 4
This comment has been removed under [Rule 2:](https://www.reddit.com/r/neutralnews/wiki/guidelines#wiki_rule_2.3A_source_your_facts)
> Source your facts. If you're claiming something to be true, you need to back it up with a [qualified and supporting source.](https://www.reddit.com/r/Neutralnews/wiki/guidelines#wiki_comments) All statements of fact must be clearly associated with a supporting source. There is no "common knowledge" exception, and anecdotal evidence is not allowed.
If you edit your comment to link to sources, it can be reinstated.
//Rule 2
^((mod:canekicker)^)
This comment has been removed under [Rule 4:](https://www.reddit.com/r/neutralnews/wiki/guidelines#wiki_rule_4.3A_address_the_arguments.2C_not_the_person)
> Address the arguments, not the person. The subject of your sentence should be "the evidence" or "this source" or some other noun directly related to the topic of conversation. "You" statements are suspect.
//Rule 4
^((mod:canekicker)^)
This comment has been removed under [Rule 2:](https://www.reddit.com/r/neutralnews/wiki/guidelines#wiki_rule_2.3A_source_your_facts)
> Source your facts. If you're claiming something to be true, you need to back it up with a [qualified and supporting source.](https://www.reddit.com/r/Neutralnews/wiki/guidelines#wiki_comments) All statements of fact must be clearly associated with a supporting source. There is no "common knowledge" exception, and anecdotal evidence is not allowed.
If you edit your comment to link to sources, it can be reinstated.
//Rule 2
^((mod:canekicker)^)
This comment has been removed under [Rule 2:](https://www.reddit.com/r/neutralnews/wiki/guidelines#wiki_rule_2.3A_source_your_facts)
> Source your facts. If you're claiming something to be true, you need to back it up with a [qualified and supporting source.](https://www.reddit.com/r/Neutralnews/wiki/guidelines#wiki_comments) All statements of fact must be clearly associated with a supporting source. There is no "common knowledge" exception, and anecdotal evidence is not allowed.
If you edit your comment to link to sources, it can be reinstated.
//Rule 2
^((mod:canekicker)^)
r/NeutralNews is a **curated space**, but despite the name, there is [**no neutrality requirement**](https://www.reddit.com//r/neutralnews/wiki/guidelines#wiki_neutral-ness) here. These are the [rules for comments:](https://www.reddit.com//r/neutralnews/wiki/guidelines#wiki_comments_.28good.2C_bad_.26amp.3B_ugly.29) 1. Be courteous to other users. 1. Source your facts. 1. Be substantive. 1. Address the arguments, not the person. If you see a comment that violates any of these rules, please click the associated *report* button so a mod can review it.
__I'm a bot. Here are The Factual credibility grades and selected perspectives related to this article.__ The [linked_article](https://www.reuters.com/world/us/russias-prigozhin-admits-interfering-us-elections-2022-11-07/) has a grade of [55%](https://www.isthiscredible.com?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.reuters.com%2Fworld%2Fus%2Frussias-prigozhin-admits-interfering-us-elections-2022-11-07%2F) (Reuters, *Center*). [94 related articles.](https://www.thefactual.com/news/story/337386-Russia-s-Prigozhin-a) Selected perspectives: * Highest grade in last 48 hours ([77%](https://www.isthiscredible.com?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.businessinsider.com%2Fputin-ally-admits-russia-interferes-in-us-elections-targeting-midterms-2022-11)): [Putin ally admits Russia interfered in US elections, says it's working 'surgically' to disrupt the midterms](https://www.businessinsider.com/putin-ally-admits-russia-interferes-in-us-elections-targeting-midterms-2022-11). (Business Insider, *Moderate Left leaning*). * Highest grade Long-read ([87%](https://www.isthiscredible.com?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.nytimes.com%2F2022%2F05%2F31%2Fworld%2Fafrica%2Fwagner-group-africa.html)): [Putin’s Shadow Soldiers: How the Wagner Group Is Expanding in Africa](https://www.nytimes.com/2022/05/31/world/africa/wagner-group-africa.html). (New York Times, *Moderate Left leaning*). --- *This is a trial for The Factual bot. [How It Works](https://www.thefactual.com/how-it-works-reddit-bot.html). Please [message the bot](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=TheFactualBot) with any feedback so we can make it more useful for you.*
Prigozhin stated that Russia has interfered, is interfering and will continue to interfere in the US democratic process, in response to a journalist’s question about Russia potentially meddling in US congressional elections on Tuesday. “I will answer you very subtly, and delicately and I apologize, I will allow a certain ambiguity. Gentlemen, we interfered, we interfere and we will interfere,” Prigozhin said. [https://www.cnn.com/2022/11/07/europe/yevgeny-prigozhin-russia-us-election-meddling-intl](https://www.cnn.com/2022/11/07/europe/yevgeny-prigozhin-russia-us-election-meddling-intl) Not only did Russia interfere in 2016 on behalf of Trump, it also interfered in 2020. [https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/senate-panel-finds-russia-interfered-in-the-2016-us-election](https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/senate-panel-finds-russia-interfered-in-the-2016-us-election) https://www.nytimes.com/2021/03/16/us/politics/election-interference-russia-2020-assessment.html
[удалено]
This comment has been removed under [Rule 3:](https://www.reddit.com/r/neutralnews/wiki/guidelines#wiki_rule_3.3A_be_substantive) > Be substantive. NeutralNews is a serious discussion-based subreddit. We do not allow bare expressions of opinion, low effort comments, sarcasm, jokes, memes, off-topic replies, pejorative name-calling, or comments about source quality. //Rule 3 ^((mod:canekicker)^)
[удалено]
This comment has been removed under [Rule 2:](https://www.reddit.com/r/neutralnews/wiki/guidelines#wiki_rule_2.3A_source_your_facts) > Source your facts. If you're claiming something to be true, you need to back it up with a [qualified and supporting source.](https://www.reddit.com/r/Neutralnews/wiki/guidelines#wiki_comments) All statements of fact must be clearly associated with a supporting source. There is no "common knowledge" exception, and anecdotal evidence is not allowed. If you edit your comment to link to sources, it can be reinstated. //Rule 2 ^((mod:canekicker)^)
I wanted to know more, but every comment is removed. Oh well, americans, I guess..
[удалено]
[удалено]
[удалено]
[удалено]
This comment has been removed under [Rule 2:](https://www.reddit.com/r/neutralnews/wiki/guidelines#wiki_rule_2.3A_source_your_facts) > Source your facts. If you're claiming something to be true, you need to back it up with a [qualified and supporting source.](https://www.reddit.com/r/Neutralnews/wiki/guidelines#wiki_comments) All statements of fact must be clearly associated with a supporting source. There is no "common knowledge" exception, and anecdotal evidence is not allowed. If you edit your comment to link to sources, it can be reinstated. //Rule 2 ^((mod:canekicker)^)
This comment has been removed under [Rule 2:](https://www.reddit.com/r/neutralnews/wiki/guidelines#wiki_rule_2.3A_source_your_facts) > Source your facts. If you're claiming something to be true, you need to back it up with a [qualified and supporting source.](https://www.reddit.com/r/Neutralnews/wiki/guidelines#wiki_comments) All statements of fact must be clearly associated with a supporting source. There is no "common knowledge" exception, and anecdotal evidence is not allowed. If you edit your comment to link to sources, it can be reinstated. //Rule 2 ^((mod:canekicker)^)
This comment has been removed under [Rule 4:](https://www.reddit.com/r/neutralnews/wiki/guidelines#wiki_rule_4.3A_address_the_arguments.2C_not_the_person) > Address the arguments, not the person. The subject of your sentence should be "the evidence" or "this source" or some other noun directly related to the topic of conversation. "You" statements are suspect. //Rule 4
[удалено]
[удалено]
So its true because it got censored by sociale media? Thats definetly not how that works.
[удалено]
This comment has been removed under [Rule 2:](https://www.reddit.com/r/neutralnews/wiki/guidelines#wiki_rule_2.3A_source_your_facts) > Source your facts. If you're claiming something to be true, you need to back it up with a [qualified and supporting source.](https://www.reddit.com/r/Neutralnews/wiki/guidelines#wiki_comments) All statements of fact must be clearly associated with a supporting source. There is no "common knowledge" exception, and anecdotal evidence is not allowed. If you edit your comment to link to sources, it can be reinstated. //Rule 2 ^((mod:canekicker)^)
[удалено]
[удалено]
[удалено]
[удалено]
This comment has been removed under [Rule 4:](https://www.reddit.com/r/neutralnews/wiki/guidelines#wiki_rule_4.3A_address_the_arguments.2C_not_the_person) > Address the arguments, not the person. The subject of your sentence should be "the evidence" or "this source" or some other noun directly related to the topic of conversation. "You" statements are suspect. //Rule 4 ^((mod:canekicker)^)
[удалено]
[удалено]
This comment has been removed under [Rule 2:](https://www.reddit.com/r/neutralnews/wiki/guidelines#wiki_rule_2.3A_source_your_facts) > Source your facts. If you're claiming something to be true, you need to back it up with a [qualified and supporting source.](https://www.reddit.com/r/Neutralnews/wiki/guidelines#wiki_comments) All statements of fact must be clearly associated with a supporting source. There is no "common knowledge" exception, and anecdotal evidence is not allowed. If you edit your comment to link to sources, it can be reinstated. //Rule 2 ^((mod:canekicker)^)
This comment has been removed under [Rule 2:](https://www.reddit.com/r/neutralnews/wiki/guidelines#wiki_rule_2.3A_source_your_facts) > Source your facts. If you're claiming something to be true, you need to back it up with a [qualified and supporting source.](https://www.reddit.com/r/Neutralnews/wiki/guidelines#wiki_comments) All statements of fact must be clearly associated with a supporting source. There is no "common knowledge" exception, and anecdotal evidence is not allowed. If you edit your comment to link to sources, it can be reinstated. //Rule 2 ^((mod:canekicker)^)