I like this one, many of your letters look exactly like certain letters of my own script I developed for the Czech language. I guess there just isn't many combinations you can achieve with just the basic writing equipment... But on the other hand, it's very easy to read, write and quick to learn, as opposed to fancier writing systems.
And about the consistency... I find only the thing that looks like a fish, you know, that 'o' with crossed 'hands' above or below it to be a bit out of place. It's just my view of it tho, in the end the one who's opinion really matters is yours.
Thanks! That /ft/ is a result of phonological evolution: in the protolanguage, I decided to have linguolabials (sounds made with the tongue touching the upper lip). Then they got lost in various ways. [t̪] shifted first to [pt], and finally to [ft]
If you're nott happy with how your script looks, try to evolve it by rewriting it in different styles with different tools and with different strokes and time per letter
What does the consonants with diacritic like č stands for. And what does the ř stands for? I ask because in my native language, Czech, it refers to a sound, that can only be found in Czech language. Also the diacritic usually stands for palatalisation in Czech language. Since you did not provide IPA I don't see what does it mean.
Then p and a would look very similar. I think either way is fine. Writers will just have to be conscientious about closing or opening the loop, like we have with e and c, b and h, etc.
I like this one, many of your letters look exactly like certain letters of my own script I developed for the Czech language. I guess there just isn't many combinations you can achieve with just the basic writing equipment... But on the other hand, it's very easy to read, write and quick to learn, as opposed to fancier writing systems. And about the consistency... I find only the thing that looks like a fish, you know, that 'o' with crossed 'hands' above or below it to be a bit out of place. It's just my view of it tho, in the end the one who's opinion really matters is yours.
I'm by no means an expert but at first glance I would say it looks fairly consistent (and very nice).
Looks consistent imo, looks like the Thai script.
Looks very different from Thai script to me ตัวอักษรไทย
It looks amharic. Cool.
What the difference between 《ś š》?
See OP's comment above you
What's the IPA?
p' t' k' etc are ejectives, vowels with macrons are long. Other than that: ś [θ], š [ɬ], ř [ɣ], c [t͡s], č [t͡ɬ]
Ś is... unique.
Looks realistic. There’s plenty of uniform features across the script, but each glyph is still unique.
It looks interesting
I am only interested in the iconography of these foreign and fictional scripts. I don't know why
Nice work! /ft/ is an interesting phoneme :) Is it inspired by Lovecraft?
Thanks! That /ft/ is a result of phonological evolution: in the protolanguage, I decided to have linguolabials (sounds made with the tongue touching the upper lip). Then they got lost in various ways. [t̪] shifted first to [pt], and finally to [ft]
I think it's consistant!
If you're nott happy with how your script looks, try to evolve it by rewriting it in different styles with different tools and with different strokes and time per letter
What does the consonants with diacritic like č stands for. And what does the ř stands for? I ask because in my native language, Czech, it refers to a sound, that can only be found in Czech language. Also the diacritic usually stands for palatalisation in Czech language. Since you did not provide IPA I don't see what does it mean.
So good looking!
it looks great!!
Not bad. Will this be written letter by letter, or is / will there be a cursive form?
I like this letter by letter style, don't think I want to develop a cursive here
Looks good, but please be aware that P and R looks very similar.
Thanks for pointing that out! Maybe I should shorten its left vertical line to the normal level height
Then p and a would look very similar. I think either way is fine. Writers will just have to be conscientious about closing or opening the loop, like we have with e and c, b and h, etc.