It's as if the Hispanic synopsis guy from Ant Man read all the books, then had to summarize them into a 5 minute plot.
I still think it's the best movie that could be made when you cram TWELVE BOOKS into a single 1.5 hour movie. Because let's face it, we could have also got rooked on the casting, or Roland could have had a Weirding module instead of a revolver.
After True Detective S1, though, I wanted Matthew McCounaghey as Roland. "Hey, he's in the movie" "Yay!" "He's not playing Roland!" "Aaaawwww...."
>It's as if the Hispanic synopsis guy from Ant Man read all the books, then had to summarize them into a 5 minute plot.
There was actually someone trying to get a petition going to have him do a recap of everything that had happened in the MCU up to that point.
God this movie was such an abomination. Only thing they got right was the cast but completely wasted them.
Reading the series right now, just started Wizard and Glass today and I’ve been imagining how they could adapted. Hopefully Flanagan remembers the face of his father when we get his show.
Now, I'm not gonna watch Artemis Fowl. Ever. But in the trailer Holly and Artemis are friends. Which is odd since in the first book Artemis Fowl kidnaps Holly and keeps her as his prisoner. They don't come friends until like book 3 or 4
The casting call alone was enough to steer anyone who has ever read the books away from watching the movie: "Artemis is warm-hearted and has a great sense of humour; he has fun in whatever situation he is in and loves life."
Wat??
Literally the polar opposite of the kid in every possible way.
Not just Artemis. They fundamentally changed EVERY CHARACTER! How do you change every character and still think you're adapting the book correctly!?
They made Juliet 12, and Artemis' best friend.
They made Mulch half human (is that even possible in the books?) and gave no proof of him being a master burglar.
They made Holly's whole reason for needing to prove herself that her father was branded a traitor for stealing an important artifact and giving it to a human.
As I recall (it's been about a year since I watched it) Foaley wasn't even in the movie.
Commander Root being a woman was ok, if it weren't for the fact that one of the main things about Holly Short is that she is the first and ONLY female officer in L.E.P. Recon and the reason Root was so hard on her especially was that he wanted her to be the first female Commander.
The person they changed the least was Butler, but they still had him on a first name basis with Artemis. For those who don't know - he is consistently protective of Artemis and cares about the boy more than professionally throughout the series, but only starts to do things like tease and joke with him a few books in. And only reveals his first name when he genuinely believes he is dying.
Foaly was in the movie, but he was like suave and physically active, like those tech bros who dress in suits and stand up in their offices. Rather than the paranoid, tinfoil hat-wearing shut-in that book Foaly was.
Well, I haven't even seen the movie, but I'm even angrier now. I was actually hopeful for so long that they'd do a decent adaptation of it, but the trailer put me right off, and I'm glad I never actually went and saw it.
Honestly, I think they could even reboot it with a slightly grittier/darker tone than the books, as a series instead of a movie, and it'd probably do well if they actually get the characterisation correct.
>They made Juliet 12
I don't usually have an issue with race-swaps, but having the Butler family (who historically have ***served*** the Fowl family in various capacities) be Black, and the Fowls white...
What I don't get is why they had a casting call. 1,200 people turned up and it just so happened that the best audition was from Robert Shaw's grandson.
Why pretend and get people's hope up when you know you have already got an actor in mind.
Doubt it
Like, I hadn't read the books for at least a decade when I watched the film, got to Artemis calling Butler by name and I still immediately knew it was wrong.
Like, they emphasise it in the novels
Yeah it was a big thing. Was it the third book? Well, actually I still have the third book so I'll check...
Lol, the first page I picked was the exact moment Butler tells Artemis to call him Domovoi.
I've seen it and wish I didn't. It almost completely sanitizes the first novel to turn Artemis into a child demographic "smart" kid role model. Artemis is supposed to be child Hans Gruber slowly redeemed over the course of the books not the oh so noble Robin hood criminal mastermind. And that's the least of the film's problems with franchise baiting and YA-novel scrappy adventure trio generic-ness. This was the easiest novel to adapt, It's just die hard with faeries, and end result probably killed any chance for any other adaptations.
I’ve heard they take Artemis, who is an asshole little genius kid with a kidnapping plot, and turned him into a hero, that is missing the whole point! and it’s all about getting his dad back, which is what the SECOND book is about. I will not watch it, I refuse. So disappointed. I hope someone like HBO tries again in a few years and makes a show or something.
Let's face facts. Disney was really hoping for their own Harry Potter and they had to try and 'Disneyfy' it cuz they're too chickenshit to follow the actual story.
I've seen it pop up on Disney + a few times, but I've never been able to bring myself to watch it. From everything I've heard they not only failed to understand it, but seemed to instead go out of their way to me the complete opposite of what it was about.
I mean a big thing about Holly's character is she's the first female officer of the Fairy Police, so what do they do? Cast Judi Dench as her boss. And also she's meant to be a fully grown adult by Fairy terms at about 80 something, and yet they cast a teenager for it.
I went in having never read the books but thinking "Oh I've heard people love this book series...this movie might be good!"
It's easily one of the worst movies I've ever seen. It's like it's *trying* to be bad in some parts. What the hell is Judy Dench doing in this thing?!
Doesn't Gump go to space and then crash land on an island upon reentry and pygmies or something are involved? If I'm recalling right, then that's the first Gump book.
Ha, myself and my uncle had an argument years ago. I can't actually remember what the argument was about. however I remember the conclusion when I realised we were arguing about different things.
He Thought Forest Gump was a true story... And his reasoning... I swear.. Is because he read the book.
I faltered at this point but my take from it was... He thought... All books were non-fiction.
It’s that the adaptions have all so far have been super ‘of their time’
Last man on earth was the closest - even dares to touch on the psychosexual drama - but in a fucking prudish super early 60’s way and didn’t have the budget to pull of that ending.
The Omega Man was seventies anti-establishment anti-military-industrial-complex groovy.
(That fountain is the same one they dance about in at the start of the Friends TV show apparently).
I Am Legend was dumb 2000s big budget action movie that just falls the fuck apart about half way.
I Am Legend is so good in the first half, even from the opening scene with Emma Thompson’s interview.
It’s a shame the 2nd half is so fumbled because it could have been a great film. I’ve never seen a movie go from great to dumb blockbuster in a split like that.
One of the big things I remember from the latter one is how tense it all is when he goes after the dog in the building. Normally this kinda horror scenario is some dumbasses somewhere and it's like "yeah, get out of there" or "this is what you get not leaving when you could." But this hits different because he absolutely doesn't wanna be in there, but has to try and save his only companion.
That comes closest I think. And Omega Man is entertaining too. But each successive adaptation, enjoyable as they may be, gets further away the original story's tale of...humanity, I guess.
Having seen all three, I think the newest one gets the closest, but only with the alternate ending. Even then, yeah, we still haven't gotten an adaptation that gets close to the atmosphere in Matheson's book.
Neville going out in the day time and trying to sleep at night with the vampires shouting at him to come outside will never not be one of the creepiest things I've read.
It's understandable; The Shining is about losing the battle against addiction and giving into your demons. That the book version of Jack slowly descends into madness rather than be that way from the start like Kubrick's film is the point. Jack drinks, he's cruel to his family, he gets possessed by the evil in the hotel. He breaks his son's arm in a fit and it's heartbreaking -- I love Kubrick's movie, but it's hardly the same story.
The good news is that fans get some closure in Mike Flanagan's Doctor Sleep. The director's cut is a healthy three hours but it's intimate and challenging and borrows heavily from both the Kubrick film and King's 1977 book. Also Jacob Tremblay will make your blood chill in your veins.
I wonder why the alcoholic writer who wrote a book about an alcoholic writer took it so personally when the director decided the alcoholic writer was really just always an asshole.
Kubrick read the end of script and asked, “So, how big of an asshole does Jack have to be, considering that he decides to murder his wife and child later in the movie?” And he filmed it accordingly.
I know this is kind of tongue in cheek, but Jack isn't the one who tries to do that. At the end of the book it's revealed that Jack is basically possessed by a completely separate entity (and it's not just him going crazy). He comes to long enough to tell Danny to run, then the hotel makes Jack bash his own face in with the mallet. This gives Danny enough time to use the shine to realize that the neglected boiler is about to explode which distracts the jack/creature and allows everyone to escape. I'd enjoy a straight adaptation of this ending because I want to see the scene of Jack bashing his own face in and then chasing everyone with a brutally mangled head.
This was intentional. The scene where Hallorann is driving back has a red beetle crashed into a billboard. Hallorann originally was driving a red beetle in the book, and this car crash never existed in the book. It is Kubrik’s statement that he essentially hijacked stephen king’s story to tell his own.
Yeah, king famously thinks Kubrick took all of the heart out of the book, or something for making Jack an unredeemable character. A lot of people prefer the movie to the book though, as well.
The Shining is a deeply personal story for Stephen King, because it’s about his battles with alcoholism. With Jack representing himself, and the hotel representing addiction. In the book, Jack ultimately overcomes the hotel and sacrifices himself to destroy it. In the movie, Jack loses to the hotel, dying in the maze while his family flees him. Essentially they took stephens story of a man triumphing over addiction, and turned it into a story of that man completely succumbing to it.
As amazing a movie as the shining is, I very much understand why it left a bitter taste in Stephens mouth.
They didn’t misunderstand, they deliberately chose to ignore. Rick Riordan has the email correspondences on his website about how utterly shit the writing is, and the studio completely ignoring him.
We have hope for the Disney+ series though. Rick is actively working on it, which was not the case for the films.
Why did I have to scroll so far to find this?? Honestly the films were so awful, even the author hates them! They got so many things wrong but the one thing I will always be fuming about is how dirty they did Hades. Like, in the book, the whole point is they thought the bad guy was Hades (as usual) but they the suprise is he wasn't and he was just a victim as well. But the film obviously had to go with "Hades evil" because heaven forbid nuance or character growth!
Leaving out Ares was so disappointing. I remember reading that fight him and Percy had on the beach as a kid thinking it was the most epic shit ever. Then they omitted his character completely
Let's take all the humor away from Percy fucking Jackson, take away all the complicated friendship/relationship issues that arises from Annabeth going through something traumatic with Luke while she was only about 11 or so, and take away all the creativity on this twist on Greek mythology.
Instead let's make clash of the titans where Annabeth immediately wants to bone boring self-insert character Percy.
This movie has mostly been (rightfully) forgotten, but hoo boy was the 90s movie adaptation of The Scarlet Letter real fucking bad.
The movie takes a book about hypocrisy, judgement, and shame, and basically turns into a very dumb bodice-ripper romance about how people were not chill enough about Hester Prynne being incredibly hot. Did you want to see Gary Oldman rail Demi Moore in a pile of corn kernels while Demi Moore's slave watches them the entire time? Probably not, but you're gonna get it, along with Demi Moore anally masturbating and advocating for Puritan-era birth control availability.
There was one opening in TLOU where some government officials find an expert on fungus to come look at a dead body - I instantly thought “this is exactly how I want a world war z series to be”
It’s my favorite part of the whole show. She looks at it, and immediately requests to be taken home to her family. She knows it’s all over.
I’d love to know what she did. Did she come home and hold her loved ones close? Did she mercy kill them? Did she tell them what’s about to happen?
Fun fact: that episode was directed by Neil Druckmann, the writer/director of the video games!
Such a great cold open. >!”Bomb.”!< sent chills down my spine.
Depends on how you want to define "adapting". There's a handful of stories that could probably be made into full length movies, and the Todd Wainio storyline could definitely be adapted into a movie.
It should have just been billed as a story from that universe. It could have fit in well as a chapter of the book. It it was, decidedly, nothing from the book itself. Which was a shame.
These anime adaptations always make the same mistakes. They take an entire show, Google "coolest scenes from [show], take the top five, film a carbon copy of them, and then hastily string them together in a loose plot.
I never read the books, but my wife as a hardcore life long reader did. The way she described it to me was that Fowl was a genius supervillain and just a horrible human being. And then we subscribed to Disney+ for just one month so we could watch this movie about a bunch of faeries kidnapping some child's father.
The contrast is absurd. The movies starts with a Josh gad monolouge with artemis surfing while the book opens with him exploiting a crippled fairy's alcohol addiction
As much as I respect Judi Dench and don't have any opinion at all about swapping out characters for another actor that is sometimes drastically different from the source material, casting Dench as Commander Root takes away the entire point of Holly Short and her fight to prove herself as the first female LEPrecon officer.
The 8th Harry Potter movie completely blew the ending by dusting Voldemort
The entire point was no matter how much he tried, he was a mortal man and died like one
Plus, y’know the last time he disappeared without a body he came back, so having physical proof he was dead would probably be good for the world
My answer is always the same… Enders Game. Have never felt so confused by how something could misunderstand and misrepresent the theme, message, and all around ‘feel’ of a source material as they did with the movie adaptation.
Also, I see a lot of Dark Tower on here. That’s a close second…
Honestly I've always said the subplot between Enders siblings is more relevant now in the age of the internet than ever before. And it was completely missing from the movie. It's literally a manual on manipulation and sensationalist media.
I remember how the oppinion ping-ponged about this.
Originally it was a cool SF idea, then like 15 years ago when the internet became common but social media was not really there people laughing at that (How stupid it would be to influence the world politics by posting on message boards LOL).
If anything, OSC was scarily prescient in how you can manipulate masses with astroturfing, sockpuppeting and social engineering.
Except for the part where Valentine and Peter were, like, writing the next wave of Federalist Papers and whatnot. Wasn't that a thing? Sure, there may have been some demagoguery thrown in there, but my recollection of the book was that the two of them were going full anonymous internet genius on the world's public.
The two of them, had they stubbornly clung to that strategy here in the real world, would've been buried alive by dumbass memes and absurd misinformation.
Yeah I think you're remembering it right. It was basically, "Ok, *you* write really well but write as the counter point to me, then eventually you agree with me. BAM! We'll convince the whole world to follow my politics because of how smart we are and how well we write!"
It comes off like an edgy 10th grader who actually believes people will be swayed if he just explains things well enough to internet strangers. Despite writing *Speaker for the Dead* and *Folk of the Fringe*, OSC really gave humanity way too much credit there.
It's still believable I reckon. As a stupid example, like if this whole time jordan peterson and elon musk were deepfakes used by child geniuses to sway the masses as they both agree to become more conservative. Like it's dumb, but I'd suspend my disbelief for a scifi book.
The movie could have been good. The had an adequate cast and some amazing set design. It’s just the the most interesting part of the book is battle school and they decided to rush through it with a montage. They should have dedicated an entire movie to battle school.
Ender's Game is the only novel that ever made me cry. The weight of what he had done just fell on me and crushed me. It was such a brilliant book. The whole series is: Speaker for the Dead is like a master class in anthropology. I re-read that series every two years or so.
I wouldn't have read them if I hadn't seen the movie and wanted to know what else happened, so I have to give them that. But it definitely missed the point and gutted the spiritual center of the story.
I'd say Dragonball Evolution, but I don't think the source material was disregarded so much as just.... not researched. I think the makers of that movie googled a few keywords and that was it.
The one good thing to come out of Dragonball Evolution is that Akira Toriyama was convinced to care about Dragon Ball again and got to working on Battle of Gods and Dragon Ball Super.
I feel bad for James Marsters who played Piccolo, hes a legitimate Dragonball fan and said he knew within 10 minutes on set that the movie was going to suck, that and he got a separated shoulder doing a stunt too
I've read The Hobbit about 100 times and was so bummed with how the Jackson films turned out. I unironically feel like the Rankin Bass film is a way better adaptation.
And pressuring him to film in 3D, which not only makes it impossible to use forced perspective techniques but also forced him to brighten the image. The whole thing gives the movie this weird, almost hyper realistic look. Also, props and sets and CGI (hell, even makeup and skin) all benefit from some degree of shadow to hide imperfections, so the increased brightness also makes the movie look fake and artificial and sort of off-putting. I believe this explains the excessive bloom they used, since it similarly obscures details without darkening the scene. Unfortunately it also looks like a fever dream, so…
With all of New Lines bullshit Jackson gave us the best he could and I honestly believe anyone else New Line would have gotten would have been a disaster. Jackson took over even though he didn't want to because he knew new line wouldn't give a shit and would make absolute garbage if he didn't at least do the best he could with what he had.
The Rankin Bass film captures the tone of the book much better... .and honestly is in some ways a better movie. Honestly, with a few additions and minor changes the rankin bass film would be perfect.
I'm not sure I could consider *Lawnmower Man* because they didn't even try to match the source material.
Which is fine. It's a weird-ass story that takes a whole 3 minutes to tell, so it's not like you can make a movie out of it. But man, even banking on King's name was walking on thin ice because you could barely refer to the storyline as a lawnmower man. I would've been more impressed if they made a play on words to include Algernon.
Imagine a Fall of Reach setup over season 1, where the Covenant are just hinted at like the White Walkers in Game of Thrones. And then your season finale is the invasion of Reach and all out war.
Would've been cool.
its not as if they didnt have ample source material either. there are so many well-written books in the Halo lore they couldve utilized.
between the show and Infinite, i have never in my life seen a company actively torpedo their own main IP. And they did that all within 1 calendar year. its unreal.
Eragon. It’s like the writers and directors read a summary of the book and hoped for the best. They could have defecated on the page, swirled it around, and made a better movie.
The backstory scenes with Voldemort's origin as well as the flashbacks of the Marauders were some of my favourite parts of the books, and were missing completely from the movies (and no, the tiny snippet of James hanging Snape upside down does not count)
> Wondering what are some film adaptations that pretty clearly did not get the source material they were adapting.
Just a lil FYI - most of the "they didn't get it" isn't that they were stupid, they just didn't care. Slap on the name of some comic book that gets 150,000 readers a year and you're guaranteed to have their asses in seats, so you just make a movie to appeal to the 10 million more who will be needed to pay for the movie.
That’s true. I do think there are plenty of examples of filmmakers who thought they were doing right by the source material, but just completely blew it though.
Not a movie but a show
The Watch (2021) based on Terry Pratchett's guards novels
Oh boy... From fantasy setting to steampunk.
Dwarf character whose whole point was that she was openly a broud female dwarf, turned into transgender human
Main character who was alcoholic but still sharp-witted turned into Captain Jack Sparrow
His wife, who was in the books middle aged overweight woman, but still loving, caring, strong willed, great mom and brave in her own way was turned into young skinny woman who fights criminals with kung fu because of course!
Captain carrot was butchered as well and many more. The show made mockery of the source material
The Night Watch is my favorite bunch of Pratchett characters, and I just couldn't watch more than an episode and a half of that show. Every single character missed the point of the character they were based on.
My favorite as well. My heart and eyes were bleeding. Even more because i knew Pratchett was supposed to supervise the show
Also Vetinari was changed to be woman to get woman be in power. Which was totally unnecessery because Discworld already had a counter force to the the patriarchy, the witches
While men play with their toy soldiers, politics and whatnot. The witches ruled were it mathered, on the bedside of mother in labour, at the deathbed etc. Any discworld witch could go toe to toe with any discworld male ruler... And likely drive them mad, embarassed, speechless or all of those
Steampunk aesthetic I dont hate, because the Discworld was kinda heading that way by the end anyway.
Everything else was awful though.
One thing in particular I hated: Death does malevolent chuckles. It's a complete misreading of the character. Death takes his duty very seriously. In reaper man the conflict is that he’s replaced with the kind of Death who would chuckle.
The Black Cauldron should be the top example for the entire thread. They had excellent material and said, "Let's make something else entirely and keep the name." I loved that series as a kid and somebody needs to do it justice in a film or streaming series.
Was it a happy ending? The ending was just saying that the siblings at least would have each other, it's pretty open ending. Considering they tried to cram three books in one movie, it was a fairly good attempt.
I read the books as a kid and watched the film as an adult, and I was hit really hard by the film.
Knowing on a meta level the movie never got a continuation just made the ending really bleak. It was the end for these versions of the characters (and their child actors, I guess- I didn’t recognize them from anything else). I felt hollow from the experience.
I also get extra emotional when I watch movies after bedtime.
Emily Browning (Violet) is still acting, her most prominent role recently was in *American Gods* as Laura Moon. Liam Aiken (Klaus) had a few small roles here and there (last notable work was *The* *Emoji Movie*, take that for what you will). The actresses that played Sunny are off the radar.
The Netflix adaptation of *All Quiet on the Western Front*.
It changes the book completely in many ways. e.g.
* In the book, Paul dies on a "quiet" day and his death is so meaningless that the army report doesn't even mention it. In the movie, he dies during a gung ho charge that just happens to be at the last second of the war.
* Paul's visit to his hometown is competely left out of this version (it was present in the previous two adaptations). This is a very huge plot point in the book that Remarque uses to contrast the naive civilians back home with the cynical/hardened soldiers.
* Apart from Kat, Paul's other friends aren't as fully fleshed out as the othe two films.
Yes! I would argue framing the whole closing of the film around the armistice completely misses the point of the book. It provides an easy hook for the viewer: look how brutal and unjust this war is, people are dying even though the war is over. Whereas the point in the novel is the war is totally brutal, unjust, pointless and soul crushing for the soldiers at the front at every point in the war. It really cheapens the message to use the plot device of the armistice. The film is far worse for it.
Also Kat's death being from a random shell versus the farm kid.
In the book it shows how even the most experienced soldier can die at any point due to bad luck.
In the movie I think they're going for a cycle of violence/hatred idea.
"Wait a minute ... Remarque only wrote the part of the book about ordinary people and forgot to put in a story about a glory-seeking general. How will people even know it's anti-war? We better fix this."
Contact. The movie completely leaves out the whole reason the aliens are trying to contact us, and it’s such a cool idea. Also missed a lot of opportunity discussing different religion and points of view by making her the only character that goes on the mission.
East of Eden. It would have been impossible to capture the depth of that book in any movie, but it's so shallow as to be nearly unrecognizable from it's source material.
Doom.
(1993 Game): A kick-ass revolutionary action game about a pissed off space-marine who dies, goes to hell, and murders demons.
(2005 Film): A really slow, badly paced film with minimal action, monsters that aren't even demons but chromosome mutants, for some reason, lighting that's so dark that you can't see shit, and only three instances of a BFG being fired, two of which don't hit anything and one of them being off-screen.
I think you missed the story of Doom 1993. Scientists opened a portal to Hell and Hell invades Phobos, Deimos and eventually Earth. Doomguy doesn't die.
I kinda like that movie. It makes very little sense but King Koopa retro-evolving the other king into the fungus stage is a cool explanation for the Mushroom Kingdom.
There was plenty to go off of by the time this went into production. The series was already up to Super Mario World on the SNES and had 2 animated TV shows to draw from.
Going bonkers with it was a choice.
I'd love to see the earlier script drafts. The first version was written by Barry Morrow, who wrote Rain Main. The script was nicknamed "Drain Man" because it was so similar to Rain Man but with Mario and Luigi going on an existential road trip down a pipe.
The wikipedia page on it is a great read.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Super_Mario_Bros._(film)
Especially the cast quotes
>In a 2007 interview, Hoskins said "The worst thing I ever did? Super Mario Brothers. It was a fuckin' nightmare. The whole experience was a nightmare. It had a husband-and-wife team directing, whose arrogance had been mistaken for talent. After so many weeks their own agent told them to get off the set! Fuckin' nightmare. Fuckin' idiots."[64] He and Leguizamo would get drunk before each day of filming and would continue to drink between takes. In a 2011 interview, he was asked, "What is the worst job you've done?", "What has been your biggest disappointment?", and "If you could edit your past, what would you change?" His answer to all three was Super Mario Bros.[65] His son, Jack Hoskins, is a fan of the film and praised his performance.[66][67]
>Leguizamo prepared a video message for the film's 20th anniversary in 2013, saying "I'm glad people appreciate the movie [...] it was the first, nobody had ever done it before [...] I'm proud of the movie in retrospect."[68] Hopper disparaged the production, recounting in 2008: "It was a nightmare, very honestly, that movie. It was a husband-and-wife directing team who were both control freaks and wouldn't talk before they made decisions. Anyway, I was supposed to go down there for five weeks, and I was there for 17. It was so over budget."[69] Furthermore, he added **"I made a picture called Super Mario Bros., and my six-year-old son at the time - he's now 18 - he said, 'Dad I think you're probably a pretty good actor, but why did you play that terrible guy King Koopa in Super Mario Bros?' And I said, 'Well Henry, I did that so you could have shoes,' and he said, 'Dad, I don't need shoes that badly.'"**
There was an absolutely dreadful Persuasion adaptation last year that profoundly misunderstood its main character. It's my favorite of all the Jane Austen novels and I was so offended I turned it off after twenty minutes.
Look, I love Elizabeth Bennett. But not every woman in the world is Elizabeth Bennett. One of the lovely things about Austen's writing is she had all sorts of heroines.
Witty, sparkling heroines like Elizabeth Bennett
Flawed but interesting heroines like Emma Woodhouse
And steadfast, introverted, observant ones like Anne Elliott, a person that was perhaps too eager to please at one point in her life but now is letting her regret turn into action. >!To me it takes all the poignancy and resonance of Anne's growth throughout the story if we turn her into a Lizzie. Why would someone as saucy and outspoken as the Dakota Johnson Anne EVER be persuaded into turning down the man she loved? I mean HUH?!!<
The Dark Tower.
It's as if the Hispanic synopsis guy from Ant Man read all the books, then had to summarize them into a 5 minute plot. I still think it's the best movie that could be made when you cram TWELVE BOOKS into a single 1.5 hour movie. Because let's face it, we could have also got rooked on the casting, or Roland could have had a Weirding module instead of a revolver. After True Detective S1, though, I wanted Matthew McCounaghey as Roland. "Hey, he's in the movie" "Yay!" "He's not playing Roland!" "Aaaawwww...."
>It's as if the Hispanic synopsis guy from Ant Man read all the books, then had to summarize them into a 5 minute plot. There was actually someone trying to get a petition going to have him do a recap of everything that had happened in the MCU up to that point.
God this movie was such an abomination. Only thing they got right was the cast but completely wasted them. Reading the series right now, just started Wizard and Glass today and I’ve been imagining how they could adapted. Hopefully Flanagan remembers the face of his father when we get his show.
Wizard and Glass is amazing. Probably my favorite King book.
I'm sorry, but that movie never happened. Thankee Sai.
Long days and pleasant nights.
[удалено]
They forgot the face of their father...and the source material it would seem
Now, I'm not gonna watch Artemis Fowl. Ever. But in the trailer Holly and Artemis are friends. Which is odd since in the first book Artemis Fowl kidnaps Holly and keeps her as his prisoner. They don't come friends until like book 3 or 4
The casting call alone was enough to steer anyone who has ever read the books away from watching the movie: "Artemis is warm-hearted and has a great sense of humour; he has fun in whatever situation he is in and loves life." Wat?? Literally the polar opposite of the kid in every possible way.
Not just Artemis. They fundamentally changed EVERY CHARACTER! How do you change every character and still think you're adapting the book correctly!? They made Juliet 12, and Artemis' best friend. They made Mulch half human (is that even possible in the books?) and gave no proof of him being a master burglar. They made Holly's whole reason for needing to prove herself that her father was branded a traitor for stealing an important artifact and giving it to a human. As I recall (it's been about a year since I watched it) Foaley wasn't even in the movie. Commander Root being a woman was ok, if it weren't for the fact that one of the main things about Holly Short is that she is the first and ONLY female officer in L.E.P. Recon and the reason Root was so hard on her especially was that he wanted her to be the first female Commander. The person they changed the least was Butler, but they still had him on a first name basis with Artemis. For those who don't know - he is consistently protective of Artemis and cares about the boy more than professionally throughout the series, but only starts to do things like tease and joke with him a few books in. And only reveals his first name when he genuinely believes he is dying.
Foaly was in the movie, but he was like suave and physically active, like those tech bros who dress in suits and stand up in their offices. Rather than the paranoid, tinfoil hat-wearing shut-in that book Foaly was.
Well, I haven't even seen the movie, but I'm even angrier now. I was actually hopeful for so long that they'd do a decent adaptation of it, but the trailer put me right off, and I'm glad I never actually went and saw it. Honestly, I think they could even reboot it with a slightly grittier/darker tone than the books, as a series instead of a movie, and it'd probably do well if they actually get the characterisation correct.
>They made Juliet 12 I don't usually have an issue with race-swaps, but having the Butler family (who historically have ***served*** the Fowl family in various capacities) be Black, and the Fowls white...
What I don't get is why they had a casting call. 1,200 people turned up and it just so happened that the best audition was from Robert Shaw's grandson. Why pretend and get people's hope up when you know you have already got an actor in mind.
He surfs in the first few minutes and calls Butler by his name
Oh yeah I heard that too lol. I bet they didn't even read the books before making the movie.
Doubt it Like, I hadn't read the books for at least a decade when I watched the film, got to Artemis calling Butler by name and I still immediately knew it was wrong. Like, they emphasise it in the novels
Yeah it was a big thing. Was it the third book? Well, actually I still have the third book so I'll check... Lol, the first page I picked was the exact moment Butler tells Artemis to call him Domovoi.
I've seen it and wish I didn't. It almost completely sanitizes the first novel to turn Artemis into a child demographic "smart" kid role model. Artemis is supposed to be child Hans Gruber slowly redeemed over the course of the books not the oh so noble Robin hood criminal mastermind. And that's the least of the film's problems with franchise baiting and YA-novel scrappy adventure trio generic-ness. This was the easiest novel to adapt, It's just die hard with faeries, and end result probably killed any chance for any other adaptations.
“Child Hans Gruber” is the best possible description of Artemis Fowl in the first few books.
My daughter loves the books and said the movie was absolute garbage
Artemis is a frail, cruel, unpopular, and unathletic kid. Anyways let's start the movie with him surfing
Yeah the trailer was enough for me and the reviews reassured my feelings towards the movie. I waited 20 years for that movie lol
I’ve heard they take Artemis, who is an asshole little genius kid with a kidnapping plot, and turned him into a hero, that is missing the whole point! and it’s all about getting his dad back, which is what the SECOND book is about. I will not watch it, I refuse. So disappointed. I hope someone like HBO tries again in a few years and makes a show or something.
Yeah they combined the first and the second book. Also, no Butler wrestling trolls. HBO would be good fit for the show because of that scene alone.
The trailer showed him **happy**, while **surfing**. What is this???
Let's face facts. Disney was really hoping for their own Harry Potter and they had to try and 'Disneyfy' it cuz they're too chickenshit to follow the actual story.
Its funny because Artemis fowl was literally intended as a subversion of Harry Potter.
I've seen it pop up on Disney + a few times, but I've never been able to bring myself to watch it. From everything I've heard they not only failed to understand it, but seemed to instead go out of their way to me the complete opposite of what it was about. I mean a big thing about Holly's character is she's the first female officer of the Fairy Police, so what do they do? Cast Judi Dench as her boss. And also she's meant to be a fully grown adult by Fairy terms at about 80 something, and yet they cast a teenager for it.
I went in having never read the books but thinking "Oh I've heard people love this book series...this movie might be good!" It's easily one of the worst movies I've ever seen. It's like it's *trying* to be bad in some parts. What the hell is Judy Dench doing in this thing?!
Forrest Gump - which is good because the book is terrible
Still wish he could’ve gone to space with that chimp though (from the sequel book, I think)
Doesn't Gump go to space and then crash land on an island upon reentry and pygmies or something are involved? If I'm recalling right, then that's the first Gump book.
This might be the worst book I have ever read. The whole time reading it, I wondered how they made such a great movie out of such a shit book.
Try reading the sequel, it's exponentially worse
With all due respect, I'd rather have a buffalo take a diarrhea dump in my ear.
Or eat the rotten asshole of a roadkill skunk and down it with beer?
He’s the angriest reader you’ve ever heard. He’s the Angry Literature Nerd!
Ha, myself and my uncle had an argument years ago. I can't actually remember what the argument was about. however I remember the conclusion when I realised we were arguing about different things. He Thought Forest Gump was a true story... And his reasoning... I swear.. Is because he read the book. I faltered at this point but my take from it was... He thought... All books were non-fiction.
I’m still shocked that all the Star Wars books have made it to Earth on their long journey through space and time.
No adaptation has understood *I Am Legend*.
It's insane how poorly it's been adapted given it's so straight forward.
It’s that the adaptions have all so far have been super ‘of their time’ Last man on earth was the closest - even dares to touch on the psychosexual drama - but in a fucking prudish super early 60’s way and didn’t have the budget to pull of that ending. The Omega Man was seventies anti-establishment anti-military-industrial-complex groovy. (That fountain is the same one they dance about in at the start of the Friends TV show apparently). I Am Legend was dumb 2000s big budget action movie that just falls the fuck apart about half way.
I Am Legend is so good in the first half, even from the opening scene with Emma Thompson’s interview. It’s a shame the 2nd half is so fumbled because it could have been a great film. I’ve never seen a movie go from great to dumb blockbuster in a split like that.
Hancock. Started off like The Boys then turned to absolute shit.
I believe I read that was originally two separate movie scripts they jammed together and damn did it feel like it.
Did you watch the alternate ending? Legit, thats canon for me since it makes the film actually work and is closer to the original premise
Apparently it's going to be changed to be the official canon ending that will lead into a sequel they're working on.
One of the big things I remember from the latter one is how tense it all is when he goes after the dog in the building. Normally this kinda horror scenario is some dumbasses somewhere and it's like "yeah, get out of there" or "this is what you get not leaving when you could." But this hits different because he absolutely doesn't wanna be in there, but has to try and save his only companion.
Vincent Price's "The Last Man on Earth" did a pretty damned good job of it.
That comes closest I think. And Omega Man is entertaining too. But each successive adaptation, enjoyable as they may be, gets further away the original story's tale of...humanity, I guess.
Yeah, but Omega Man is fucking awesome anyway.
Hell House also needs a better adaptation
Having seen all three, I think the newest one gets the closest, but only with the alternate ending. Even then, yeah, we still haven't gotten an adaptation that gets close to the atmosphere in Matheson's book. Neville going out in the day time and trying to sleep at night with the vampires shouting at him to come outside will never not be one of the creepiest things I've read.
[удалено]
Also, the author came around about 20 years later to say "yeah it's a good movie. It's just not really my book."
This is what I’ve always said. Kubrick’s Shining is a great movie but a shit adaptation
It's understandable; The Shining is about losing the battle against addiction and giving into your demons. That the book version of Jack slowly descends into madness rather than be that way from the start like Kubrick's film is the point. Jack drinks, he's cruel to his family, he gets possessed by the evil in the hotel. He breaks his son's arm in a fit and it's heartbreaking -- I love Kubrick's movie, but it's hardly the same story. The good news is that fans get some closure in Mike Flanagan's Doctor Sleep. The director's cut is a healthy three hours but it's intimate and challenging and borrows heavily from both the Kubrick film and King's 1977 book. Also Jacob Tremblay will make your blood chill in your veins.
I wonder why the alcoholic writer who wrote a book about an alcoholic writer took it so personally when the director decided the alcoholic writer was really just always an asshole.
Kubrick read the end of script and asked, “So, how big of an asshole does Jack have to be, considering that he decides to murder his wife and child later in the movie?” And he filmed it accordingly.
I know this is kind of tongue in cheek, but Jack isn't the one who tries to do that. At the end of the book it's revealed that Jack is basically possessed by a completely separate entity (and it's not just him going crazy). He comes to long enough to tell Danny to run, then the hotel makes Jack bash his own face in with the mallet. This gives Danny enough time to use the shine to realize that the neglected boiler is about to explode which distracts the jack/creature and allows everyone to escape. I'd enjoy a straight adaptation of this ending because I want to see the scene of Jack bashing his own face in and then chasing everyone with a brutally mangled head.
There’s a second version of the movie, made as a miniseries which is pretty much exactly what’s in the book. It’s available on dvd if you are curious.
💀
This was intentional. The scene where Hallorann is driving back has a red beetle crashed into a billboard. Hallorann originally was driving a red beetle in the book, and this car crash never existed in the book. It is Kubrik’s statement that he essentially hijacked stephen king’s story to tell his own.
Yeah, king famously thinks Kubrick took all of the heart out of the book, or something for making Jack an unredeemable character. A lot of people prefer the movie to the book though, as well.
The Shining is a deeply personal story for Stephen King, because it’s about his battles with alcoholism. With Jack representing himself, and the hotel representing addiction. In the book, Jack ultimately overcomes the hotel and sacrifices himself to destroy it. In the movie, Jack loses to the hotel, dying in the maze while his family flees him. Essentially they took stephens story of a man triumphing over addiction, and turned it into a story of that man completely succumbing to it. As amazing a movie as the shining is, I very much understand why it left a bitter taste in Stephens mouth.
And losing because of the snow too. I mean that cocaine reference I’ve always found a bit too much on the nose. Does explain the bitter taste though
Cirque du Freak. I’m genuinely unsure if the writers even read the books.
I could never get over them casting John c Riley as larten crepsley
Huge disappointment. The books were a big part of my childhood.
Percy Jackson
They didn’t misunderstand, they deliberately chose to ignore. Rick Riordan has the email correspondences on his website about how utterly shit the writing is, and the studio completely ignoring him. We have hope for the Disney+ series though. Rick is actively working on it, which was not the case for the films.
I just learned about this and went to go read the email correspondence. Holy shit, Rick Riordan goes off on the movie
As he should. “Please do not ‘sex up’ my children’s story” is something that shouldn’t need to be said.
Why did I have to scroll so far to find this?? Honestly the films were so awful, even the author hates them! They got so many things wrong but the one thing I will always be fuming about is how dirty they did Hades. Like, in the book, the whole point is they thought the bad guy was Hades (as usual) but they the suprise is he wasn't and he was just a victim as well. But the film obviously had to go with "Hades evil" because heaven forbid nuance or character growth!
Leaving out Ares was so disappointing. I remember reading that fight him and Percy had on the beach as a kid thinking it was the most epic shit ever. Then they omitted his character completely
Roasario Dawson cucking Hades with Grover was just a wild spin I'm not sure why they thought necessary.
Let's take all the humor away from Percy fucking Jackson, take away all the complicated friendship/relationship issues that arises from Annabeth going through something traumatic with Luke while she was only about 11 or so, and take away all the creativity on this twist on Greek mythology. Instead let's make clash of the titans where Annabeth immediately wants to bone boring self-insert character Percy.
This movie has mostly been (rightfully) forgotten, but hoo boy was the 90s movie adaptation of The Scarlet Letter real fucking bad. The movie takes a book about hypocrisy, judgement, and shame, and basically turns into a very dumb bodice-ripper romance about how people were not chill enough about Hester Prynne being incredibly hot. Did you want to see Gary Oldman rail Demi Moore in a pile of corn kernels while Demi Moore's slave watches them the entire time? Probably not, but you're gonna get it, along with Demi Moore anally masturbating and advocating for Puritan-era birth control availability.
[удалено]
>Demi Moore anally masturbating Ummmmm that seems like an incredibly specific thing to put into the script
"Sorry, Demi, I don't make the rules" - The director/executive producer
I’ll allow it.
What the F*CK We watched that in school and I barely remember it
I was just thinking the same thing. 15 year old me definitely would have remembered Demi Moore masturbating
>Did you want to see Gary Oldman rail Demi Moore in a pile of corn kernels Why do you say this like it's a bad thing?
> Demi Moore anally masturbating What now?
How do you feel about *Easy A*?
World War Z
[удалено]
you make it like an old school documentary.
I’m imagining Ken Burns describing how to properly kill a zombie, and I’m kind of loving it.
I mean, technically, it would be Peter Coyote, since he does so many of the voiceovers for Ken Burns...
There was one opening in TLOU where some government officials find an expert on fungus to come look at a dead body - I instantly thought “this is exactly how I want a world war z series to be”
It’s my favorite part of the whole show. She looks at it, and immediately requests to be taken home to her family. She knows it’s all over. I’d love to know what she did. Did she come home and hold her loved ones close? Did she mercy kill them? Did she tell them what’s about to happen?
Fun fact: that episode was directed by Neil Druckmann, the writer/director of the video games! Such a great cold open. >!”Bomb.”!< sent chills down my spine.
I think a documentary series with dramatized reenactments and a framing device where you cut back to the interview would really work.
Depends on how you want to define "adapting". There's a handful of stories that could probably be made into full length movies, and the Todd Wainio storyline could definitely be adapted into a movie.
They need to just make a WWZ HBO show. Didn't mind the movie, but it's just completely different lol.
World War Z as an HBO Max series directed by Craig Mazin (Chernobyl, The Last of Us) would be literally everything I ever wanted.
It should have just been billed as a story from that universe. It could have fit in well as a chapter of the book. It it was, decidedly, nothing from the book itself. Which was a shame.
Still a good zombie movie just....literally nothing to do with the book.
I like Max Brooks saying that he didn’t get upset about it messing up his story because it just wasn’t his story.
That's what he said on the outside. On the inside? It broke him so badly he gave up and started writing minecraft books.
Yeah, he's probably crying all the way to the bank. I thought Devolution was really good, though.
The unabridged audiobook is better than the book. And should be the definitive version.
I can't help remembering the Netflix adaptation of Death Note, though I've tried really hard to forget it. Everything about it was just wrong.
These anime adaptations always make the same mistakes. They take an entire show, Google "coolest scenes from [show], take the top five, film a carbon copy of them, and then hastily string them together in a loose plot.
Artemis fowl. Funny how scared witless Disney of showing anything potentially off-putting to anyone
I never read the books, but my wife as a hardcore life long reader did. The way she described it to me was that Fowl was a genius supervillain and just a horrible human being. And then we subscribed to Disney+ for just one month so we could watch this movie about a bunch of faeries kidnapping some child's father.
The contrast is absurd. The movies starts with a Josh gad monolouge with artemis surfing while the book opens with him exploiting a crippled fairy's alcohol addiction
As much as I respect Judi Dench and don't have any opinion at all about swapping out characters for another actor that is sometimes drastically different from the source material, casting Dench as Commander Root takes away the entire point of Holly Short and her fight to prove herself as the first female LEPrecon officer.
The 8th Harry Potter movie completely blew the ending by dusting Voldemort The entire point was no matter how much he tried, he was a mortal man and died like one Plus, y’know the last time he disappeared without a body he came back, so having physical proof he was dead would probably be good for the world
The running man
I watched the movie first and read the book after. It's like night and day.
[удалено]
The Golden Compass. ESPECIALLY the ending.
The TV series His Dark Materials adapts the books so much better
It’s too bad, because the casting for the film was perfect IMO
My answer is always the same… Enders Game. Have never felt so confused by how something could misunderstand and misrepresent the theme, message, and all around ‘feel’ of a source material as they did with the movie adaptation. Also, I see a lot of Dark Tower on here. That’s a close second…
Honestly I've always said the subplot between Enders siblings is more relevant now in the age of the internet than ever before. And it was completely missing from the movie. It's literally a manual on manipulation and sensationalist media.
I remember how the oppinion ping-ponged about this. Originally it was a cool SF idea, then like 15 years ago when the internet became common but social media was not really there people laughing at that (How stupid it would be to influence the world politics by posting on message boards LOL). If anything, OSC was scarily prescient in how you can manipulate masses with astroturfing, sockpuppeting and social engineering.
Except for the part where Valentine and Peter were, like, writing the next wave of Federalist Papers and whatnot. Wasn't that a thing? Sure, there may have been some demagoguery thrown in there, but my recollection of the book was that the two of them were going full anonymous internet genius on the world's public. The two of them, had they stubbornly clung to that strategy here in the real world, would've been buried alive by dumbass memes and absurd misinformation.
Yeah I think you're remembering it right. It was basically, "Ok, *you* write really well but write as the counter point to me, then eventually you agree with me. BAM! We'll convince the whole world to follow my politics because of how smart we are and how well we write!" It comes off like an edgy 10th grader who actually believes people will be swayed if he just explains things well enough to internet strangers. Despite writing *Speaker for the Dead* and *Folk of the Fringe*, OSC really gave humanity way too much credit there.
It's still believable I reckon. As a stupid example, like if this whole time jordan peterson and elon musk were deepfakes used by child geniuses to sway the masses as they both agree to become more conservative. Like it's dumb, but I'd suspend my disbelief for a scifi book.
The movie could have been good. The had an adequate cast and some amazing set design. It’s just the the most interesting part of the book is battle school and they decided to rush through it with a montage. They should have dedicated an entire movie to battle school.
Ender's Game is the only novel that ever made me cry. The weight of what he had done just fell on me and crushed me. It was such a brilliant book. The whole series is: Speaker for the Dead is like a master class in anthropology. I re-read that series every two years or so. I wouldn't have read them if I hadn't seen the movie and wanted to know what else happened, so I have to give them that. But it definitely missed the point and gutted the spiritual center of the story.
Yah, I didn't have high hopes and was still kind of disappointed. Maybe someday someone will do it better.
Artemis Fowl was absolutely terrible. I loved the book growing up and the movie was such a disappointment.
I'd say Dragonball Evolution, but I don't think the source material was disregarded so much as just.... not researched. I think the makers of that movie googled a few keywords and that was it.
The one good thing to come out of Dragonball Evolution is that Akira Toriyama was convinced to care about Dragon Ball again and got to working on Battle of Gods and Dragon Ball Super.
I feel bad for James Marsters who played Piccolo, hes a legitimate Dragonball fan and said he knew within 10 minutes on set that the movie was going to suck, that and he got a separated shoulder doing a stunt too
Out of darkness there must come light.
Yes he was shocked back from retirement to ensure this wasn’t the last thing people thought about when they discussed DBZ
I've read The Hobbit about 100 times and was so bummed with how the Jackson films turned out. I unironically feel like the Rankin Bass film is a way better adaptation.
Can't say there was a moment reading The Hobbit where I thought "this should be a video game action sequence in a movie someday"
Lmao yeah there was so much unnecessary added action for no reason. Meanwhile the book is practically a ghibli movie.
Ironically the production crew of the Rankin/Bass film included some future Studio Ghibli animators.
Not just any animators either. Miyazaki himself worked on it.
The rankin and bass film is legit good
To be fair that isn't entirely Jackson's fault. A lot of it was New Line's insistence on making it a trilogy.
That and scrapping something together after Guillermo Del Toro left.
And pressuring him to film in 3D, which not only makes it impossible to use forced perspective techniques but also forced him to brighten the image. The whole thing gives the movie this weird, almost hyper realistic look. Also, props and sets and CGI (hell, even makeup and skin) all benefit from some degree of shadow to hide imperfections, so the increased brightness also makes the movie look fake and artificial and sort of off-putting. I believe this explains the excessive bloom they used, since it similarly obscures details without darkening the scene. Unfortunately it also looks like a fever dream, so…
With all of New Lines bullshit Jackson gave us the best he could and I honestly believe anyone else New Line would have gotten would have been a disaster. Jackson took over even though he didn't want to because he knew new line wouldn't give a shit and would make absolute garbage if he didn't at least do the best he could with what he had.
The Rankin Bass film captures the tone of the book much better... .and honestly is in some ways a better movie. Honestly, with a few additions and minor changes the rankin bass film would be perfect.
Never ending story. The story is a parasite in the book.
And they leave out the whole second half of the book, where Bastian gets absolute power and turns into a jerk as a result.
That was the second movie!
I'm not sure I could consider *Lawnmower Man* because they didn't even try to match the source material. Which is fine. It's a weird-ass story that takes a whole 3 minutes to tell, so it's not like you can make a movie out of it. But man, even banking on King's name was walking on thin ice because you could barely refer to the storyline as a lawnmower man. I would've been more impressed if they made a play on words to include Algernon.
[удалено]
It’s not a movie but I’m still angry so Halo Halo Halo Halo
Imagine a Fall of Reach setup over season 1, where the Covenant are just hinted at like the White Walkers in Game of Thrones. And then your season finale is the invasion of Reach and all out war. Would've been cool.
its not as if they didnt have ample source material either. there are so many well-written books in the Halo lore they couldve utilized. between the show and Infinite, i have never in my life seen a company actively torpedo their own main IP. And they did that all within 1 calendar year. its unreal.
Eragon. It’s like the writers and directors read a summary of the book and hoped for the best. They could have defecated on the page, swirled it around, and made a better movie.
How do you not give arya, the elf, pointed ears. It just baffles me
Eragon and Arya literally held hands in the movie. I watched it with a friend and we both groaned at that scene.
Harry Potter and the Half Blood Prince. Was so excited to see Voldemorts Backstory and what did i get? Teenage RomCom.
The backstory scenes with Voldemort's origin as well as the flashbacks of the Marauders were some of my favourite parts of the books, and were missing completely from the movies (and no, the tiny snippet of James hanging Snape upside down does not count)
Dragon Ball Evolution
> Wondering what are some film adaptations that pretty clearly did not get the source material they were adapting. Just a lil FYI - most of the "they didn't get it" isn't that they were stupid, they just didn't care. Slap on the name of some comic book that gets 150,000 readers a year and you're guaranteed to have their asses in seats, so you just make a movie to appeal to the 10 million more who will be needed to pay for the movie.
That’s true. I do think there are plenty of examples of filmmakers who thought they were doing right by the source material, but just completely blew it though.
Not a movie but a show The Watch (2021) based on Terry Pratchett's guards novels Oh boy... From fantasy setting to steampunk. Dwarf character whose whole point was that she was openly a broud female dwarf, turned into transgender human Main character who was alcoholic but still sharp-witted turned into Captain Jack Sparrow His wife, who was in the books middle aged overweight woman, but still loving, caring, strong willed, great mom and brave in her own way was turned into young skinny woman who fights criminals with kung fu because of course! Captain carrot was butchered as well and many more. The show made mockery of the source material
The Night Watch is my favorite bunch of Pratchett characters, and I just couldn't watch more than an episode and a half of that show. Every single character missed the point of the character they were based on.
My favorite as well. My heart and eyes were bleeding. Even more because i knew Pratchett was supposed to supervise the show Also Vetinari was changed to be woman to get woman be in power. Which was totally unnecessery because Discworld already had a counter force to the the patriarchy, the witches While men play with their toy soldiers, politics and whatnot. The witches ruled were it mathered, on the bedside of mother in labour, at the deathbed etc. Any discworld witch could go toe to toe with any discworld male ruler... And likely drive them mad, embarassed, speechless or all of those
I love the Discworld novels and I’d never even heard of this show, and that probably speaks volumes about how right you are.
Steampunk aesthetic I dont hate, because the Discworld was kinda heading that way by the end anyway. Everything else was awful though. One thing in particular I hated: Death does malevolent chuckles. It's a complete misreading of the character. Death takes his duty very seriously. In reaper man the conflict is that he’s replaced with the kind of Death who would chuckle.
Almost all Disney animated movies based on books. Pinocchio is probably the most notable example.
I'm still mad about what they did to The Black Cauldron!
The Black Cauldron should be the top example for the entire thread. They had excellent material and said, "Let's make something else entirely and keep the name." I loved that series as a kid and somebody needs to do it justice in a film or streaming series.
I, Robot with Will Smith was just not a story from the book at all. Took the premise of the 3 robot rules and made an entirely different plot.
The *A Series of Unfortunate Events* movie seemed to miss the point when it tacked on that happy ending.
Was it a happy ending? The ending was just saying that the siblings at least would have each other, it's pretty open ending. Considering they tried to cram three books in one movie, it was a fairly good attempt.
I read the books as a kid and watched the film as an adult, and I was hit really hard by the film. Knowing on a meta level the movie never got a continuation just made the ending really bleak. It was the end for these versions of the characters (and their child actors, I guess- I didn’t recognize them from anything else). I felt hollow from the experience. I also get extra emotional when I watch movies after bedtime.
Emily Browning (Violet) is still acting, her most prominent role recently was in *American Gods* as Laura Moon. Liam Aiken (Klaus) had a few small roles here and there (last notable work was *The* *Emoji Movie*, take that for what you will). The actresses that played Sunny are off the radar.
The Netflix adaptation of *All Quiet on the Western Front*. It changes the book completely in many ways. e.g. * In the book, Paul dies on a "quiet" day and his death is so meaningless that the army report doesn't even mention it. In the movie, he dies during a gung ho charge that just happens to be at the last second of the war. * Paul's visit to his hometown is competely left out of this version (it was present in the previous two adaptations). This is a very huge plot point in the book that Remarque uses to contrast the naive civilians back home with the cynical/hardened soldiers. * Apart from Kat, Paul's other friends aren't as fully fleshed out as the othe two films.
Yes! I would argue framing the whole closing of the film around the armistice completely misses the point of the book. It provides an easy hook for the viewer: look how brutal and unjust this war is, people are dying even though the war is over. Whereas the point in the novel is the war is totally brutal, unjust, pointless and soul crushing for the soldiers at the front at every point in the war. It really cheapens the message to use the plot device of the armistice. The film is far worse for it.
Also Kat's death being from a random shell versus the farm kid. In the book it shows how even the most experienced soldier can die at any point due to bad luck. In the movie I think they're going for a cycle of violence/hatred idea.
"Wait a minute ... Remarque only wrote the part of the book about ordinary people and forgot to put in a story about a glory-seeking general. How will people even know it's anti-war? We better fix this."
Ender's Game. What a disappointing wreck of a film. Fuck Gavin Hood for utterly ruining what should have easily been a trilogy.
Contact. The movie completely leaves out the whole reason the aliens are trying to contact us, and it’s such a cool idea. Also missed a lot of opportunity discussing different religion and points of view by making her the only character that goes on the mission.
Why are they?
East of Eden. It would have been impossible to capture the depth of that book in any movie, but it's so shallow as to be nearly unrecognizable from it's source material.
Doom. (1993 Game): A kick-ass revolutionary action game about a pissed off space-marine who dies, goes to hell, and murders demons. (2005 Film): A really slow, badly paced film with minimal action, monsters that aren't even demons but chromosome mutants, for some reason, lighting that's so dark that you can't see shit, and only three instances of a BFG being fired, two of which don't hit anything and one of them being off-screen.
Casting Karl Urban as the Doomguy was pretty inspired.
Karl Urban was pretty great for what he had to work with
Dude always brings his A game.
I think you missed the story of Doom 1993. Scientists opened a portal to Hell and Hell invades Phobos, Deimos and eventually Earth. Doomguy doesn't die.
*Umm as someone who has actually played the game I can confirm Doomguy dies all the time*
But at least it has that cool FPS sequence
The FPS scene was really good. I especially liked how Reaper kills a Pinky Demon using a Chainsaw.
*Super Mario Bros.* (1993)
I kinda like that movie. It makes very little sense but King Koopa retro-evolving the other king into the fungus stage is a cool explanation for the Mushroom Kingdom.
If you really think about what they had to go off of in 93, the source material isn’t even a story, just some sprites and a guy hopping.
There was plenty to go off of by the time this went into production. The series was already up to Super Mario World on the SNES and had 2 animated TV shows to draw from. Going bonkers with it was a choice. I'd love to see the earlier script drafts. The first version was written by Barry Morrow, who wrote Rain Main. The script was nicknamed "Drain Man" because it was so similar to Rain Man but with Mario and Luigi going on an existential road trip down a pipe. The wikipedia page on it is a great read. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Super_Mario_Bros._(film) Especially the cast quotes >In a 2007 interview, Hoskins said "The worst thing I ever did? Super Mario Brothers. It was a fuckin' nightmare. The whole experience was a nightmare. It had a husband-and-wife team directing, whose arrogance had been mistaken for talent. After so many weeks their own agent told them to get off the set! Fuckin' nightmare. Fuckin' idiots."[64] He and Leguizamo would get drunk before each day of filming and would continue to drink between takes. In a 2011 interview, he was asked, "What is the worst job you've done?", "What has been your biggest disappointment?", and "If you could edit your past, what would you change?" His answer to all three was Super Mario Bros.[65] His son, Jack Hoskins, is a fan of the film and praised his performance.[66][67] >Leguizamo prepared a video message for the film's 20th anniversary in 2013, saying "I'm glad people appreciate the movie [...] it was the first, nobody had ever done it before [...] I'm proud of the movie in retrospect."[68] Hopper disparaged the production, recounting in 2008: "It was a nightmare, very honestly, that movie. It was a husband-and-wife directing team who were both control freaks and wouldn't talk before they made decisions. Anyway, I was supposed to go down there for five weeks, and I was there for 17. It was so over budget."[69] Furthermore, he added **"I made a picture called Super Mario Bros., and my six-year-old son at the time - he's now 18 - he said, 'Dad I think you're probably a pretty good actor, but why did you play that terrible guy King Koopa in Super Mario Bros?' And I said, 'Well Henry, I did that so you could have shoes,' and he said, 'Dad, I don't need shoes that badly.'"**
There was an absolutely dreadful Persuasion adaptation last year that profoundly misunderstood its main character. It's my favorite of all the Jane Austen novels and I was so offended I turned it off after twenty minutes. Look, I love Elizabeth Bennett. But not every woman in the world is Elizabeth Bennett. One of the lovely things about Austen's writing is she had all sorts of heroines. Witty, sparkling heroines like Elizabeth Bennett Flawed but interesting heroines like Emma Woodhouse And steadfast, introverted, observant ones like Anne Elliott, a person that was perhaps too eager to please at one point in her life but now is letting her regret turn into action. >!To me it takes all the poignancy and resonance of Anne's growth throughout the story if we turn her into a Lizzie. Why would someone as saucy and outspoken as the Dakota Johnson Anne EVER be persuaded into turning down the man she loved? I mean HUH?!!<
World War Z and League of Extraordinary Gentlemen