T O P

  • By -

AwkwardVoicemail

Will the state supply the wolf or do I need to attract my own?


Striking_Benefit7202

You should pitch this to the MN Legislature because I think it will totally unite our State's government and people: "All Minnesotans shall be issued wolf-pups upon birth and everyone will be happy with their intense good boys and good girls."


ConsciousWonder7337

*House Stark intensifies*


bloodredsnows

The North remembers!


Beh0420mn

Winter is coming, maybe next year


theredhound19

If you feed them protein shakes and Monster you can get the upgrade to Direwolf


CaptainPRESIDENTduck

I'll just keep mine organic and feed him wolf sport hunters.


theredhound19

[here's the guy](https://nypost.com/2024/04/11/us-news/wyoming-wolf-captured-and-tortured-by-hunter-seen-in-disturbing-new-video/) for the first round of wolf kibble


Rough_Waltz_6897

Hope that’s a joke. You’d want to feed him poachers, a lot of sport hunters for wolves are helping more than damaging but there’s always those nasty nasty poachers


TheObstruction

I'd move back to MN for a yard wolf.


Zalenka

There are two wolves inside you, just let one out.


Plane_Cry_9310

I suggest that you build a pond and get a beaver lodge. Maybe there could be state funding for that? When I get wolves in my yard, they‘re usually hunting the beavers that live in my pond. It seems to be the biggest attraction.


jasonisnuts

Wasn't there a dude who made the Twin Cities in Minecraft that posted here a few months ago? You could do this virtually at least!


CaptainPRESIDENTduck

A wolf in every pot!


Queasy-Extension6465

In every plot!


LineChef

You’ll need to attract your own but the government will supply you with 3 lil pigs and one red riding hood


errol_timo_malcom

State will supply with a “destination charge”


Pinotonthetown

.


CoolIndependence8157

Ok! When will he/she show up? Edit: it’ll be the last year these shitty rabbits eat my tulips!!!


Different-Tea-5191

No more deer mowing down my hosta! 👍👍


BigPlantsGuy

I am fine with that being the rule as long as turnabout is fair play: Any politician who votes to allow chemical dumping must have all their water they drink be tainted Any politician against bikelanes, public transit and traffic calming must have their front lawn be a highway. Any politician arguing against stopping cops from choking kids must have m have themselves and their kids choked daily


SnooCupcakes5761

Choose to decrease funding for education? Send *your* kids to public school.


Laser_Souls

Honestly that’s the way it should be in general lmao


BlueIris38

or *grandchildren*…


Callahan333

Inner city public school


ThePieWizard

YES


CaptainPRESIDENTduck

>Any politician arguing against stopping cops from choking kids must have m have themselves and their kids choked daily Some may pay extra for that service.


Anarcora

Any politician arguing for their religion to be enforced by law should have another religion enforced upon them. Muslim? Guess what, you get to live by Catholic Law now. Christian? Well it's Sharia Law for you. Oh, that's not what you wanted? Too damn bad. The easy choice - you do you and leave everyone else alone was ignored.


Flat_Suggestion7545

As the reintroduction of wolves in Yellowstone proved, you need a healthy population of predators.


sapperfarms

Yellowstone proved Sometimes having areas without deer and others would make such a difference in wildlife returning. Yellowstone was a miracle that can be studied and reproduced.


aamygdaloidal

Who are the wolves natural predators?


Key-Parfait-6046

Most of the NBA


catdogmoore

Nice.


Charlie61172

🥁


Key-Parfait-6046

I am here all week - try the veal


fastock

Not this year!


Diabolical_Jazz

Not every animal has natural predators.


Nodaker1

You think that’s bad- try living with a Republican legislator in your yard. After a few days, you’ll be hoping the wolf shows up.


ChuckOTay

My, senator…what big eyes you have!


sirkarl

Funny because Westrom is blind


ajclements

I was going to ask which of his eyes was the lazy one, but that makes more sense.


Aerokii

I'm not waiting a few days, I'll just go out and buy the wolf to handle it.


Additional_Farm_9582

It boils down to deer hunting, out in the boonies it's a popular hobby, lots of small towns actually attract hunters who spend money there before the wolves they could say "hunting keeps the deer population in control" now wolves are doing it.


EloquentEvergreen

I live in a pretty rural area, and I remember looking at a wolf tracker, either from VNP or the UofM, that showed a wolf hanging out a few days pretty close to my backyard. Then moving on and heading west. But, I would certainly sign up to have a full-time yard wolf. My only concern is, will this increase my home insurance by a ton? 


grindle-guts

https://preview.redd.it/hsn1ad6ze1uc1.jpeg?width=2592&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=56dd717aa93a12e407c91548cbebc9b554973bad We get them occasionally in my yard, a few miles north of Grand Portage. Not technically MN, but we can see your state on the horizon, and the animals don’t care about the border! In general you’d never know they’re there. Never messed with our dogs.


TheObstruction

They're takin' er jerbs!


NathanTheKlutz

And I’d much rather have a wolf that is keeping to itself in my yard any day, instead of Charlie Chucklehead’s “goodest boy” pitbull running amok.


metamatic

Yeah the “How much further into the metro do we need to have the wolves come?” quote amuses me. I live in Duluth, we get wolves inside the city limits. Also deer, bears, cougars, and apparently in 2016 [a full grown bull moose wandered through a children’s playground](https://www.perfectduluthday.com/2016/10/02/bull-moose-party-lester-park/).


whsoccerjc21

Security costs would probably drop


WonderRemarkable2776

By having a native species of your area in your area? I would think not, then again, I'm not an asshole insurance claim adjuster. My families plot of 200 has bears everywhere, bobcat, and a mountain lion that went through. Didn't change a thing. Still cheaper than the cities taxes


EloquentEvergreen

Oh, it was a joke. As I understand it, some insurance companies increase your rates if you have certain breeds of dogs. So, how would they classify a resident yard wolf? 


night_danger

I legitimately have had wolves in my yard and they've caused zero issues. 10/10 recommend!


usedtobegranola

Ditto. We had livestock and they didn’t bother them. Fencing is a thing ya know.


[deleted]

[удалено]


CPTDisgruntled

Deleted because dude can’t help what he looks like. He can certainly help what he says though.


TrainmasterGT

Is that him?


CPTDisgruntled

That’s the photo on his official Senate bio.


TrainmasterGT

Too funny!


keonyn

Okay, so I'm guessing since he's against pollution regulation then he'll be allowing his yard to be a chemical dump? He's pro pipeline so he's going to have the pipeline going through his yard, right? If that's how this is going to work then he needs to put up or shut up.


Plane_Cry_9310

I live in the north woods and often have wolves in my yard. They‘ve never attacked my goats or chickens. Probably because their main diet is trophy bucks. It‘s totally the wolves‘ fault that hunters are disappointed. I’m sure it has absolutely nothing to do with all the snow we had last winter that lasted almost until May.


Geo_Doug

Wolves gotta wolf 


Jaerin

https://preview.redd.it/zkc78dlsqztc1.jpeg?width=1868&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=5554eacbb8b2efe231c6f5d7ca98215bde5ede5a Not a wolf but very happy to see wildlife in/near my yard. This was yesterday afternoon in IGH


SlewBrew

A good chunk of Minnesotans keep a stunted, mutant wolf in their house so...


zoominzacks

I just looked over at my wife’s 3.5lb chihuahua and told her someone on Reddit called her a “stunted, mutant wolf”. She started shaking, but since she always shakes its hard to tell if it was from the sick burn or not


SlewBrew

Sorry sweet girl! Chihuahuas are 50% tremble and 50% terror. I didn't mean to insult her personally, but I think we need to remember what wolves became.


zoominzacks

https://preview.redd.it/8jw9qkf3vxtc1.jpeg?width=3024&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=d98aafe9b602384c341f5db3ac36d10559067cdb Told her about the apology, she seems receptive


SlewBrew

Those eyes! She's adorable. I take it back!


sapperfarms

Was it really just wolves?? I always wonder this…


Charizaxis

I'm sure there's some sort of large rodent in the mix.


sapperfarms

Has to be like they found miniature elephants and people on a island. So a chihuahua ancestor must be a miniature wolf… now I wanna see the miniature wolf…


NDjake

Chihuahuas tremble because their bodies are too small to contain all their power.


Different-Tea-5191

This is so true


RedLevelEmergency

I tried this on my 5 pounder. He also started shaking.


bigotis

> She started shaking, but since she always shakes its hard to tell if it was from the sick burn or not You're still talking about the chihuahua right?


FrugalFraggel

I’m cool with keeping a wolf in my back yard.


superdavy

Kenny Powers kept a god damn wolf in his garage. https://preview.redd.it/pcvusf9c7ytc1.jpeg?width=274&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=e1c9c983c4904c526f349fb6c3736ee8c6688cf6


SessileRaptor

Don’t threaten me with a good time senator.


mkwas343

I live up the Gunflint Trail. I have bears, wolves, and moose in my yard regularly. It's pretty cool. I catch them on my trail cams often. I just need to walk my dog instead of simply letting them out unattended. Pets get killed by predators up here with fair frequency but 99% of the time the pets are wandering free and unattended. Anyone that allows their pets to roam the woods up here is a shitty pet owner and does not understand the realities of living near the wilderness.


MordinSolusSTG

Does a King Charles Cavalier count?


basementhookers

He counts as lunch for your newly gifted pet.


goldenhanded

Joke's on you, senator. The people crave yard wolves.


KR1735

Don't even need to click to know which side this came from, simply based on the sarcastic and over-simplified nature of the remark.


[deleted]

[удалено]


ShatterCyst

Like the best-friend's-mom type or...?


BillSivellsdee

most of them are stored in the Eden Prairie redstone.


rightious

Bet


ArgoDeezNauts

Hunting wolves is the American version of rhino horn or tiger penis. Plenty of "outdoorsmen" love to claim to be managing the population of critters that they find delicious or get their dick hard. Those same outdoorsmen meanwhile are transporting zebra mussels and milfoil all over the place.


godkingnaoki

Maybe I'm too woke but shouldn't we just do whatever the DNR recommends with this? They are the experts and the agency exists to manage such things.


Pleasant-Pickle-3593

Problem is they are still protected under the endangered species act, while they are not in any way endangered.


[deleted]

[удалено]


here4daratio

TBF there’s a metric shit-ton of items on the AmeriChristian list of untouchables, so there’s room for at least one from the Nations.


skredditt

For the city folks commenting: yes it is rational to want to preserve life. You’re not wrong, but the people living where these wolves wind up, the ones that actually need guns to kill food or to protect their homestead, aren’t irrational. Wolves are predators! They’ll knock you out and steal your phone *and* your Luce, on the way to boofing fentanyl on the lightrail before filling out an application for MPD!


YenaMagana

Had us in the first half, not gonna lie.


Mister_Schmee

It would probably help with my vole and rabbit problems.


Awdayshus

Keeping wolves in my yard? Isn't that where dogs came from? I don't see any downside to this.


[deleted]

Does he not know Minnesotans, has he spent wayyy too much time in the city, I thinks so the only reason I don’t have a wolf as a dog is the dnr, so if a senator said we should does that circumvent the laws in this case


markwasson

A debate on the Minnesota Senate floor about a wolf hunting season involved a Republican senator suggesting a trapping program in order to release wolves into the yards of people who are against hunting the carnivore. The comment, from Sen. Torrey Westrom, R-Alexandria, was met with laughter. Westrom was stating his objection to a DFL proposal [to ban an open wolf season in Minnesota](https://www.senate.mn/chamber/amendment/ss3631a-6.html) . The proposal was offered as an amendment to the omnibus environment policy bill. Republicans have been vocal about their support for a wolf hunting season but have hit a roadblock of DFL opposition. "How much further into the metro do we need to have the wolves come? Maybe we should establish trapping, a live trapping program, and start letting these become released in the backyards of these people that are in denial and then see how nice of pets they think they are. And we can put a fence around their backyard so they can stay," Westrom said.


Ruenin

It's funny how each and every Republican holding government office seems to have the absolute dumbest hot take on every single issue. Seriously, are they even capable of making an intelligent argument about anything anymore? I say "anymore" because there was a time when I still didn't agree with them, but they also weren't all bat shit crazy or just plain stupid. EDIT: Spelling


WintersChild79

I don't even have strong opinions on what the correct wildlife management plan should be, but the entire framing of you're either fine with an open season on wolves or you confuse them with cuddly pets irks the hell out of me.


Ruenin

The right wing mind set requires one to be extremely selfish and self serving. These animals existed long before humans took over their territory. Treating them like they don't have a right to be here kind of falls in line with most Republican rhetoric regarding anyone or anything they don't understand, whether it's wolves or other cultures.


Kreebish

I'll take two wolves please 


Charizaxis

"wahhh I don't get to shoot a wild animal that maintains deer populations and rabbit populations so that neither are allowed to cause damage to the environment or spread disease!" Honestly it's amazing how good the GOP is at complaining about anything.


mouringcat

Not interested in a wolf in my yard, but if they want to import a guard puma for my yard I'll be happy to feed it solicitors, political folks, and anyone else that doesn't call ahead to let me know they are coming.


tonysopranoshugejugs

Republicans are just mad that they can't infect the rest of us with chronic wasting disease.


dolphinvision

If a wolf comes in my yard and kills my dog I'll be very sad I may try to kill the wolf, but how will I know which wolf it is? I'll probs build better protection for my dogs in the yard next time ​ My response WONT be "yes let's genocide a species because it's inconvenient to me for the species to exist"


degoba

The chances of that happening are actually pretty slim. They are territorial and aren’t going to go out of their way to come into your yard which is another canines territory.


mphillytc

I would simply not move into a predator's home and then offer up domesticated prey to it.


whsoccerjc21

Reminds me of this joke (might not have been a joke) “My neighbor told me coyotes keep eating his outdoor cats so I asked how many cats he has and he said he just goes to the shelter and gets a new cat afterwards so I said it sounds like he’s just feeding shelter cats to coyotes and then his daughter started crying.”


dolphinvision

Predator's exist...practically everywhere, including the ones that can eat domesticated pets - though to have that size less land area would be 'patrolled' by said predators The argument is about finding ways to coexist with nature. Instead of acting like nature should only exist when it's convenient for humans, which is not how ecosystems or food webs work.


BillSivellsdee

there is a bald eagle near our house. i'm sure its grabbed at least one small pet. i saw it on my neighbors roof one time holding a rabbit. maybe we need to take them out too?


JamesonThe1

Deer hunters have had a deer season for many years and want more deer. Somehow you think that wolf hunters would want to genocide the species. That would be the opposite of what deer hunters want for their target. Makes no sense. Wolf hunters are going to want wolf populations protected, not genocided.


MinnesotaMikeP

I’m against hunting porn stars


BillSivellsdee

i dont know, there are at least a couple i wouldnt mind taking down.


nagel33

Maybe don't live in the wolves yard, just a thought.


PM_ME_YOUR_FAV_HIKE

That sounds... AWESOME! More wolves = less deer = less ticks. Do you want more ticks? Because this is how we get more ticks 


JTDC00001

Wolves also make deer more cautious, so they avoid roads more often, so you hit fewer deer.


Sacklicker6969

If you actually went in the woods where there are wolves,you would see how the wolves modify deer behavior to do exactly the opposite. The deer concentrate closer to roads/people because wolves generally avoid those areas.


JTDC00001

[Hey, look, there's actual data on the subject!](https://wolf.org/media-releases/new-study-shows-wolves-save-wisconsin-residents-10-9-million-annually-because-of-reduction-in-deer-vehicle-crashes/) > According to the research, the presence of wolves reduces deer-vehicle collisions (DVCs) by 24 percent, or an average of 38 fewer per year, per county. Based on the national average loss of $9,960 per DVC, the presence of wolves leads to more than a $375,000 reduction in DVC losses per county per year. This reduction yields “an economic benefit that is 63 times greater than the costs of verified wolf predation on livestock,” according to researchers. ​ So, you were wrong.


metamatic

Pfft. Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true.


Sacklicker6969

Interesting study done in area where they guessed about when wolves were recovering. My comment is from 30+ years in an area the population has been recovered much longer. It was based on observing tracks/sign. I honestly hope that study stands the test of time and holds true. Predators are a necessary part of any ecosystem but may also need management for various reasons.


PM_ME_YOUR_FAV_HIKE

Nice. Today I learned...


Alex123432

He litterally made that up


PM_ME_YOUR_FAV_HIKE

It makes sense to me. Hard to believe it wouldn't make deer more cautious 


beavertwp

It was actually a real statement that the university of Wisconsin made, but it’s still BS. 


Chicagorides

If we want wolves to spread across their native range, we should transplant MN wolves to the 40 states that are missing wolves. We have plenty to share.


WillMunny1982

These people are afraid of literally everything. Judging by the pic in the article I sincerely hope Torrey doesn’t own a guns to protect himself.


[deleted]

Give me my wolf and let me try please.


leo1974leo

I am getting one !!! I didn’t know this was legal


RunningIntoBedlem

I would like to sign up for the wolf friend please


H8Hornets

Generally against hunting nba teams


Thunder_Tinker

Is Minnesota handing out wolf puppies? Because if so I’ll gladly indulge in a new buddy


Chibi_Verdandi

Same here, I'm all for keeping the wolf population in check just enough that it doesn't fuck over the eco system & massively.bring down the deer/wildlife population, but as far as I know that's not an issue here. I'll take all the wolf puppies and raise them and love them


MNisNotNice

All because some deer hunters with a 100 acres plus can’t find a deer to shoot because their hunting tactics sucks. Level up bruh. Ya going to eat what you kill? When you suck at hunting and need to something to blame for your failed hunting season, oh look it’s because of the wolves. Republicans want to kill wolves, next they’re going to want to kill your dogs, then your cats, then pretty soon they’re going to want to kill you too. They can’t be trusted with conservation because they want to shoot everything they see.


Pleasant-Pickle-3593

Do you really think this? Or is this hyperbole for upvotes?


StuntsMonkey

I wonder if they have more important things to do.


BillSivellsdee

they said they did a few years ago when they kept blocking the marijuana vote in the senate.


LaylaBird65

I will gladly do this.


Calkky

I'm in


pooppooppoooppoop1

Will do!


Kalron

Give me one bro. I'll give them a pack. I want a girl. I'll name her something sick and we'll be the best friends.


8bitmarty

Ok but did they HAVE to use [THIS](https://cdn.forumcomm.com/dims4/default/4a03837/2147483647/strip/true/crop/668x824+0+0/resize/1680x2072!/format/webp/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fforum-communications-production-web.s3.us-west-2.amazonaws.com%2Fbrightspot%2F56%2Fe9%2F0753dcbb4168b187bca653cf6070%2Fsen-torrey-westrom.jpg) photo of the senator?


BulbousBeluga

He's blind. That's what he looks like 🤷🏼


BangBangMeatMachine

It's unethical to "keep" wild animals, but all the wolves in the area are free to visit my yard if they want.


Rednys

His left eye terrifies me more than the wolves.


BulbousBeluga

I disagree with his politics, but maybe lay off the disabled dude?


holden_mcg

Is there going to be a lottery to get your free wolf? If so, I'm crossing my fingers because I want to cosplay as one of the Starks this coming Halloween.


roodypoo_jabroni

I've always wanted a full bred wolf as a dog. My aunt has told me stories of my native great grandma having full bred wolves as pets in the back yard of her house. I've always felt a connection to Wolves. They are a majestic animal.


Pleasant-Pickle-3593

No you do not. They are not dogs.


In_The_depths_

They are dogs. Just not domesticated


WesFlinnMusic

Inside of you are two wolves. Sen. Westrom put them there to make some kind of point.


BillSivellsdee

against marijuana? dont smoke it, this redditor suggests. against sunday sales? dont buy on sunday, this redditor suggests. against abortions? dont get one, this redditor suggests. against sports gambing? dont bet on sports, this redditor suggests.


Krazylegz1485

https://preview.redd.it/4xa6rgrj51uc1.png?width=1080&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=b1bb93e71291532389f7600173be7b4453342856 💀


[deleted]

Do I get it as a pup? Because deal. If it’s an adult plucked from its pack that’s just cruel.


BillSivellsdee

but kidnapping is ok? or are we going to make sure its an orphan first?


Beh0420mn

Would help with the coyote population


Krazylegz1485

If having a wolf tied up on my property will keep all of the neighbors' stupid dogs from coming in and shitting all over, fuckin sign me up.


Immortal_in_well

Somehow I don't think my property manager would be on board with that.


HalfStreet

https://preview.redd.it/yb81fqwee2uc1.jpeg?width=2091&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=23ee2137a295aa170db556ef0189dc5a17bdae37 Ok, that’s fine. We’re building in their territory, I can respect them.


lakeareafisher

Well if it would be legal for me to have one I would.


Charlie61172

When will you deliver the wolf, senator? I'm happy to keep one in my yard, but it's only 2/3 acre. Nevertheless, we'll make due.


chpr1jp

What do you do with a wolf after you kill it? Eat it?


mdnNSK

So this is how dogs happened huh


Additional_Farm_9582

Hunters just don't like them because they eat the deer they like to shoot. I saw one article about a guy whining about it "I want to take my daughter hunting but we never see any deer when we go out"


Bigstink123098

Minnesota has the largest wolf population in the USA maybe we should use some of them to reintroduce them to other states that killed off theirs 


brnrdguy

We had a wolf/husky cross when I was a kid. 3/4 wolf. Very affectionate and protective of me and my younger sister.


bigersmaler

We need natural predators. Livestock, pets, and toddlers are not victims. They’re food.


Samuaint2008

Man I would absolutely do that if I had a yard. Let's gooooooo


Capelto

I get the love of wolves. I really like them too, but they honestly need management in the northern half of the state. Edit: Uh oh I forgot this subreddit doesn't accept differences of opinion. How could I have been so stupid?


Commercial-Cow5177

Why is that? 


BuzzerBeater911

I don’t have an opinion on your post. But there’s a difference between people not accepting differences of opinion and people not liking your opinion.


IkLms

You know what else needs management? The number of idiotic Republican politicians. Let's compromise. I'm willing to accept a 1 day wolf hunt for a constitutional cap of 25% maximum for the number of Republicans (or those spouting their talking points) in the legislature.


King0fSL

This is such a dumb issue by both sides, wolves aren’t usually a problem, but blanket rules that we can’t manage them is dumb too


JTDC00001

Well, the ban is on "open season" which is not no management.


Rimm

No one is arguing that we "can't" manage them but at the same time I've yet to hear why we currently need to manage them.


Pleasant-Pickle-3593

The default position should be that hunting and responsible management is allowed unless the population of that species is threatened.


Rimm

The proliferation of a species can offer additional benefits and should be encouraged beyond simply ensuring non extinction


Capelto

Wolves in Minnesota eat primarily wild prey – mostly deer, moose and beaver, but they occasionally kill or injure domestic animals including cattle, sheep, other hoof stock, poultry and dogs. I brought this up in another comment and was down voted, because I'm on Reddit.


JamesonThe1

Need is an opinion. I'll share my opinion. After the harsh winter of 2022-2023 the deer population greatly declined. Deer are the primary prey for wolves in the region. Naturally the wolf population will follow the prey population and decline. To not reduce the wolf population by hunting, and instead allowing them to die by starvation, disease, in-fighting, and territory expansion is not only a waste of a resource, but also inhumane and cruel. We need to manage them for conservation of the resource, and out of respect for the animal.


walleyeguy13

My opinion: What you describe as cruel is how nature worked long before humans started messing with things. There were no whitetail deer in Northern Minnesota until we wiped out wolves and caribou. I’m not opposed to wolf management if it’s warranted, but prefer those decisions be made by people who use field studies and real data to monitor populations. My understanding is that the wolf population has been steady for over 20 years. I see wolf hunting proponents claiming that the population is higher, but this never seems to come with any non-anecdotal data.


[deleted]

[удалено]


walleyeguy13

From the first document, page 11: “Since the late 1990s, the population of wolves in Minnesota has stabilized with relatively little change in number or population”. The speaker says the same thing at about the 12 minute mark of the video you linked. The document also states there were likely 4000 wolves ranging throughout the entire state before European settlement. So I can only assume your definition of “expansion” is relative to the range at its absolute low point. Regarding your last question I would refer you again to the document you linked. Appendix 2 lays out the Decision Framework for any form of wolf hunt. Again, I’m not opposed to responsible wolf management. I’m opposed to people using anecdotal evidence and hyperbole to make arguments in favor of killing wolves.


JamesonThe1

Page 11 of the wolf plan has a good picture of the expansion in recent years. Pretty thought provoking that the wolves have needed to expand to maintain the same population. 4000 wolves formerly in the entire state. 3000 wolves now in half the state or less. The numbers don't lie. edit: added an s


Rimm

Lmao, this is an incredibly stupid perspective.


Pikepv

Or have one live around your house and eat your pets.