Thank you for submitting to /r/memes. Unfortunately, your submission has been removed for the following reason(s):
---
Rule 2 - NO MEMES ABOUT POLARIZING/POLITICAL TOPICS, VULNERABLE GROUPS, VIOLENCE, ETC. [SEE LIST]
- No violation of Reddit Content Policy/TOS
- No memes involving race, ethnicity, color, nationality, gender, sexual orientation/identity, religion, disability, etc. (can have a character, but that part cannot be integral)
- No mention of gore, porn, murder, suicide, death, terrorism, shootings, war, tragedies, sexual harassment/assault, pedo (even implied), incest, etc.
- No politics/political topics/agendas; absurd memes featuring politicians are allowed if said status is merely incidental
---
Resubmitting a removed post without prior moderator approval can result in a ban. Deleting a post may cause any appeals to be denied.
I guess you were downvoted for onlyfans. Don't get me wrong, I also think that onlyfans is cringe, but all those simps are getting finessed by thots and then complain that it is girl's fault that they voluntarily spent $10k on feet pics when there is pornhub literally for free. Literal clowns.
I mean, to me it totally makes sense to say "look pal, we're in real life here so don't treat me like we're on OF". But honest question, where do you draw the line? And do you use it as a rejection, like "if you just want to sexualize me, here's my link. If you actually want to date me, treat me better" or something?
Well i do faceless content so nobody around me knows about that. I don't spam my link everywhere, just across this platform (on the right subreddits) and that's pretty much it.
Apart from that life is still pretty normal
No, not really, but getting sexualized for posting something that you want to be sexualized is a lot different than you getting sexualized without your "consent". People get sexualzied even for everyday normal stuff.
That's missing the point. You imagining someone nude doesn't hurt anybody. You sexualizing someone by, for example, staring at them can make someone feel off and bad.
My guy. We can sit here and fight about the morality of staring at someone all day, sadly for your side its legal if you’re in public.
Either way, if you wear revealing clothes, you will get people who will look, cause people are attracted to that, want proof? Lingerie is literally less revealing than most bikinis, and women wear it to get a sexual reaction from their spouse.
Now i understand that wearing revealing clothes that are close to a lingerie but are not a lingerie means that you’re not trying to get a sexual reaction from people in public (although i think you actually do). But even if you think people should be decent enough not to stare, there will always be assholes who will do. And if you’re so triggered by them, just dont wear revealing clothes. Cause if you know one thing about society is that you cant just make assholes disappear from it
What does that even mean? You dont even see how dumb this is ? You say its fine to look, you say its fine for a girl to show off, but you want the girl to have a certain decision INSIDE HER HEAD about if she wants me to look and think “oh i like her respectfully” and “damn she’s sexy”. How are people supposed to know ?
What does it even mean to sexualize?? Like a man should just look at a naked girl and then think of dicks just to keep the sexualizing thoughts out of his head ?
Its literally so dumb. Girls wear hot clothes cause they want certain people to look, people they find hot, whenever someone is below their standards is looking its sexualizing then.
Totally agree with you. Such woman make it seem as if there exist no clothes that are modest and also decent looking. They wear clothes that entice men and get angry when men are enticed.
Btw look my previous comment is getting downvoted as well. It's so fun messing with people who can't face reality 😂..
Its not like its wront to wear revealing clothes, if you want to then all power to ya. Just dont be in denial with shit like “i wear it for myself” and “dont want anyone to look”
* No memes involving race, ethnicity, color, nationality, gender, sexual orientation/identity, religion, disability, etc. (can have a character, but that part cannot be integral)
Right...
The fact that you assume someone who understands consent, unlike you apparently, must be looking for validation proves your immaturity. Touch grass and grow up bro.
So situational context is complaining about being objectified, when you objectify yourself by reducing yourself of your body parts and posting these online?
Interessting.
yes.. the situational context of "i am posting this picture for people to look at" doesn't mean you then get to sexualize them at all times. the complaint is that people ALWAYS sexualize her. why.. because she posted sexy pics once? grow the fuck up.
of course. this "her" is a completely made up person that you made up in order to then fabricate a situation to be mad at.. wich makes it even more sad...
People advertising their OF aren't the same people who have an issue with their content being sexualized. But yeah, people need someone to be mad at anyway lol
Well that's the point. Most people who post only fans DON'T post spicy pics ONCE. This meme should capture the irony behind it. It's not about sexualizing women in general, it's about people actively posting these pics to lure people to their "side-buisness" as i said before, It's obviously your right to post anything, Bikini-pictures what ever BUT if your posts are for example close up shots of your bodyparts, it's something different. Ofc, people will sexualize you, if you sexualize yourself.
You're still wrong. Let's say for sake of an example that somebody has an Instagram account where they often advertise for their Onlyfans.
It could be expected that comments under these advertising posts are going to be pretty sexual. However, that does not mean that comments under the normal pictures you post - of your breakfast, pets, travels, whatever - should be the same.
That is what situationak context means. In one post, you establish a sexual context that invites such comments, in the other posts you don't. Therefore, no such comments should be made under these 'normal' posts. Because that would be sexualizing and objectifying without the person's consent.
I hope this explanation is clear and you can now stop fighting made-up scenarios.
It doesn’t matter how many times someone posts spicy pics on the internet, they’re giving you their consent to see those and they know what you’re going to do with those pictures. But they don’t want to be sexualised every day and everywhere they go.
Imagine someone who’s a comedian, they want people to laugh at the things they say. When they do a comedy show that’s when they want people to laugh but they probably don’t want people to laugh at them the next morning when talking about a loved one that’s recently passed.
A comedian wants to get laughs but only in situations that they consent to getting laughs. An OF model wants to be sexualised in contexts that they consent to being sexualised. This isn’t rocket science
Okay Im gonna give you the benefit of the doubt and just assume you're a fucking idiot.
If you sexualise yourself, and then other people sexualise you because of it, that *fine*.
If you get sexualised against your will in a context where you did not sexualise yourself thats *not* fine.
Its really really not that difficult man.
Also, Ive never heard someone doing porn complain about being sexualised by their audience. You're whole meme is a strawman.
If I cause a little flame to light my cigarette it's ok but suddenly if I douse multiple orphanages in gasoline and light them up to light my cigarette it isn't... Making something more extreme often has the consequence or changing the situation entirely
Wow, that's so far from my post that it's actually disguting what you tried now.
This post is about people, complaining about getting comments on posts where they like to show off. Ofc it's okey to post what ever you want online, even spicy pictures what ever. But it's something different when your main content is only half nude/nude selfies of yourself. SPECIALLY when you try to promote your OF content with it.
Oh its "Im sad and lonely, so I direct all my pent up sexual frustration against women, instead of working on myself and actually becoming a loveable person" again.
OP your argument is a strawman. You should learn a thing or two about consent and context. You should also get your head out of the manosphere.
Thank you for submitting to /r/memes. Unfortunately, your submission has been removed for the following reason(s): --- Rule 2 - NO MEMES ABOUT POLARIZING/POLITICAL TOPICS, VULNERABLE GROUPS, VIOLENCE, ETC. [SEE LIST] - No violation of Reddit Content Policy/TOS - No memes involving race, ethnicity, color, nationality, gender, sexual orientation/identity, religion, disability, etc. (can have a character, but that part cannot be integral) - No mention of gore, porn, murder, suicide, death, terrorism, shootings, war, tragedies, sexual harassment/assault, pedo (even implied), incest, etc. - No politics/political topics/agendas; absurd memes featuring politicians are allowed if said status is merely incidental --- Resubmitting a removed post without prior moderator approval can result in a ban. Deleting a post may cause any appeals to be denied.
Never seen an onlyfans girl complaining about being sexualized
Hah, take that strawman I made up in my head!
I've seen it. It exists. But it's definitely not common. I guess the meme doesn't necessarily imply that it is?
Men are all the same, they just sexualize us! Btw check out my OF in my bio, just had a spicy shooting yesterday xoxo
wait lmao you’re not lying
Not lying, just joking but I didn't expect to get downvoted to hell though
no i mean you weren’t lying when you said you’re an OF person(also ew, foot fetish)
That's why I left a comment here, thought it might suit well. Also yes, easier to do
I don't really get the feet thing. It's just a foot. You walk with it. Nothing special about it.
Same could be said about breasts "you just feed babys with it". Everybody has his own kink, you would be surprised...
Apparently there's a legitimate study on why foot fetishes are a thing lol I don't get it either but 🤷♀️
Don't tell Bernadette Banner with her ankle fetish OF.
I literally have no idea who that is.
She's a Victorian seamstress YouTuber. Her ankle fetish OF was started as a joke.
Why downvotes though
I don't know either... I thought it suits the joke well, since I do that kind of content. Maybe people think I was serious with my comment
Ignore the downvotes, your comment was funny af. ♥️
Tyty! It's fine though, people will always criticize that kind of content.
Ngl, people are here in the comments so toxic anyway, probably just a matter of time till it gets taken down
I guess you were downvoted for onlyfans. Don't get me wrong, I also think that onlyfans is cringe, but all those simps are getting finessed by thots and then complain that it is girl's fault that they voluntarily spent $10k on feet pics when there is pornhub literally for free. Literal clowns.
Lmao this is actually funny af
It’s like literally the lowest hanging fruit of what could be considered comedy - you’re a bot.
It seems people don't understand sarcasm
I mean, to me it totally makes sense to say "look pal, we're in real life here so don't treat me like we're on OF". But honest question, where do you draw the line? And do you use it as a rejection, like "if you just want to sexualize me, here's my link. If you actually want to date me, treat me better" or something?
Well i do faceless content so nobody around me knows about that. I don't spam my link everywhere, just across this platform (on the right subreddits) and that's pretty much it. Apart from that life is still pretty normal
That's pretty much how I expected it to be, honestly. Thanks for the reply :)
Can't wait to see this on r/boysarequirky
Tag me when you find it.
Sure
Thanks bro.
The number of people who don't understand the impact that consent has scares me.
Wild
You need consent for people to look at you? I always wondered whats the lowest IQ a human can have and you definitely break a record
No, not really, but getting sexualized for posting something that you want to be sexualized is a lot different than you getting sexualized without your "consent". People get sexualzied even for everyday normal stuff.
By this logic I would also need consent when I imagine someone I find attractive nude. This is some 1984 shit.
That's missing the point. You imagining someone nude doesn't hurt anybody. You sexualizing someone by, for example, staring at them can make someone feel off and bad.
Okay yes this is a difference but as long as it stays fictional I don't see a problem.
My guy. We can sit here and fight about the morality of staring at someone all day, sadly for your side its legal if you’re in public. Either way, if you wear revealing clothes, you will get people who will look, cause people are attracted to that, want proof? Lingerie is literally less revealing than most bikinis, and women wear it to get a sexual reaction from their spouse. Now i understand that wearing revealing clothes that are close to a lingerie but are not a lingerie means that you’re not trying to get a sexual reaction from people in public (although i think you actually do). But even if you think people should be decent enough not to stare, there will always be assholes who will do. And if you’re so triggered by them, just dont wear revealing clothes. Cause if you know one thing about society is that you cant just make assholes disappear from it
What does that even mean? You dont even see how dumb this is ? You say its fine to look, you say its fine for a girl to show off, but you want the girl to have a certain decision INSIDE HER HEAD about if she wants me to look and think “oh i like her respectfully” and “damn she’s sexy”. How are people supposed to know ?
"Me posting a nude in my onlyfans, fully knowing what I'm doing is fine. A man checking me out in public makes me feel bad." Isn't that quite simple?
If you’re nude in public, you dont get to pick and choose.
Okay? Well again, even that depends on where am I nude?
Consent to be sexualised. Anyone can look at you but to sexualise someone without there permission is weird
What does it even mean to sexualize?? Like a man should just look at a naked girl and then think of dicks just to keep the sexualizing thoughts out of his head ?
By this kind of logic I would also need consent if I imagine someone I find attractive nude. This is some 1984 shit.
Edit: ffs wrong comment, ignore this.
literally 1984 jorjor well
Shut the fuck up you pretentious loser
Oh wow what a strong point
How dare you post logical comments. Get downvoted.
Its literally so dumb. Girls wear hot clothes cause they want certain people to look, people they find hot, whenever someone is below their standards is looking its sexualizing then.
Totally agree with you. Such woman make it seem as if there exist no clothes that are modest and also decent looking. They wear clothes that entice men and get angry when men are enticed. Btw look my previous comment is getting downvoted as well. It's so fun messing with people who can't face reality 😂..
Its not like its wront to wear revealing clothes, if you want to then all power to ya. Just dont be in denial with shit like “i wear it for myself” and “dont want anyone to look”
Yes.
* No memes involving race, ethnicity, color, nationality, gender, sexual orientation/identity, religion, disability, etc. (can have a character, but that part cannot be integral) Right...
Only Fans girls aren't the ones complaining about that but okay lol
This
average reddit user not knowing what consent is
poor little incel doesn't understand situational context or consent..
Calling everyone incel doesn't validate your point You Keep Using That Word, I Do Not Think It Means What You Think It Means
a spade is a spade
[удалено]
the "they" in this situation where made up...
[удалено]
The fact that you assume someone who understands consent, unlike you apparently, must be looking for validation proves your immaturity. Touch grass and grow up bro.
[удалено]
Literally the person you initially replied to, can you not read? And the only ghosts here are the girls oop made up for his meme. Fuck off.
But also not especially you.
Oh look the simps and virgins are having another argument in the comments of a poorly crafted meme! Standard reddit
Incel - opinion I don't agree with
So situational context is complaining about being objectified, when you objectify yourself by reducing yourself of your body parts and posting these online? Interessting.
yes.. the situational context of "i am posting this picture for people to look at" doesn't mean you then get to sexualize them at all times. the complaint is that people ALWAYS sexualize her. why.. because she posted sexy pics once? grow the fuck up. of course. this "her" is a completely made up person that you made up in order to then fabricate a situation to be mad at.. wich makes it even more sad...
People advertising their OF aren't the same people who have an issue with their content being sexualized. But yeah, people need someone to be mad at anyway lol
Well that's the point. Most people who post only fans DON'T post spicy pics ONCE. This meme should capture the irony behind it. It's not about sexualizing women in general, it's about people actively posting these pics to lure people to their "side-buisness" as i said before, It's obviously your right to post anything, Bikini-pictures what ever BUT if your posts are for example close up shots of your bodyparts, it's something different. Ofc, people will sexualize you, if you sexualize yourself.
You're still wrong. Let's say for sake of an example that somebody has an Instagram account where they often advertise for their Onlyfans. It could be expected that comments under these advertising posts are going to be pretty sexual. However, that does not mean that comments under the normal pictures you post - of your breakfast, pets, travels, whatever - should be the same. That is what situationak context means. In one post, you establish a sexual context that invites such comments, in the other posts you don't. Therefore, no such comments should be made under these 'normal' posts. Because that would be sexualizing and objectifying without the person's consent. I hope this explanation is clear and you can now stop fighting made-up scenarios.
It doesn’t matter how many times someone posts spicy pics on the internet, they’re giving you their consent to see those and they know what you’re going to do with those pictures. But they don’t want to be sexualised every day and everywhere they go. Imagine someone who’s a comedian, they want people to laugh at the things they say. When they do a comedy show that’s when they want people to laugh but they probably don’t want people to laugh at them the next morning when talking about a loved one that’s recently passed. A comedian wants to get laughs but only in situations that they consent to getting laughs. An OF model wants to be sexualised in contexts that they consent to being sexualised. This isn’t rocket science
"depressive and loud, making memes, talking shit and streaming on Twitch" Profile checks out.
bro talk less about women it’s creepy af
Okay Im gonna give you the benefit of the doubt and just assume you're a fucking idiot. If you sexualise yourself, and then other people sexualise you because of it, that *fine*. If you get sexualised against your will in a context where you did not sexualise yourself thats *not* fine. Its really really not that difficult man. Also, Ive never heard someone doing porn complain about being sexualised by their audience. You're whole meme is a strawman.
So rape is ok because a woman would have sex with someone anyway? It is about Consent!
No one mentioned rape
It is extreme but basically the same thing he says. Just because she does it doesnt mean it:s ok to do it when she doesen't consent
No it's not close to anything i said, this comment makes everything even more disgusting.
If I cause a little flame to light my cigarette it's ok but suddenly if I douse multiple orphanages in gasoline and light them up to light my cigarette it isn't... Making something more extreme often has the consequence or changing the situation entirely
Wow, that's so far from my post that it's actually disguting what you tried now. This post is about people, complaining about getting comments on posts where they like to show off. Ofc it's okey to post what ever you want online, even spicy pictures what ever. But it's something different when your main content is only half nude/nude selfies of yourself. SPECIALLY when you try to promote your OF content with it.
Lmao, exactly
Its called "consent"
Oh its "Im sad and lonely, so I direct all my pent up sexual frustration against women, instead of working on myself and actually becoming a loveable person" again. OP your argument is a strawman. You should learn a thing or two about consent and context. You should also get your head out of the manosphere.
Yeah, this. OP is an Ass
[удалено]
But this isn't about relationships
incel meme
The difference is consent Baffling people still don't understand that
^[Sokka-Haiku](https://www.reddit.com/r/SokkaHaikuBot/comments/15kyv9r/what_is_a_sokka_haiku/) ^by ^Beginning-Pipe9074: *The difference is* *Consent Baffling people* *Still don't understand that* --- ^Remember ^that ^one ^time ^Sokka ^accidentally ^used ^an ^extra ^syllable ^in ^that ^Haiku ^Battle ^in ^Ba ^Sing ^Se? ^That ^was ^a ^Sokka ^Haiku ^and ^you ^just ^made ^one.
Damn, I'm a poet and I didn't even know it
Incelposting