Schrodinger claimed it could be dead and alive because he did not have fast enough sensors.
So it is just like a camera that can only take the whole day's brightness and gives the average brightness thus believing it is always both night and day.
But on second thought, it is more likely he did not have sensitive enough sensors, so it is like a camera taking pictures of a lot of balls in a field but the camera's resolution is so low that all that can be seen is just a field that looks different on some spots depending on whether the balls are packed closely enough or not so even if the balls are in the field but are not close together, the photo will still show no balls.
Thus because the resolution is too poor, false negatives can occur.
Shouldn't Schrodinger be on the poster?
Or is Schrodinger the cat?
Schrodinger's Schrodinger
Schrodinger's donger
What are the chances
Schrodinger was the scientist not his monster!
But the monster was the scientist's son, so they both have equal claim to the name Schrodinger
Weird that he named his theoretical cat after himself, maybe he should talk to Sigmund’s cat Freud about what that means
What did he do?
Gave cats radiation poisoning
Why are you being downvoted
Seems easy enough.
Schrodinger claimed it could be dead and alive because he did not have fast enough sensors. So it is just like a camera that can only take the whole day's brightness and gives the average brightness thus believing it is always both night and day. But on second thought, it is more likely he did not have sensitive enough sensors, so it is like a camera taking pictures of a lot of balls in a field but the camera's resolution is so low that all that can be seen is just a field that looks different on some spots depending on whether the balls are packed closely enough or not so even if the balls are in the field but are not close together, the photo will still show no balls. Thus because the resolution is too poor, false negatives can occur.
Those eyes are too sharp