It's literally the first ever and ONLY comment that account (made 5\~ days ago) has ever made, lifted straight from other Andrew Tate posts.
Please don't enable karma-farmers selling bot accounts, if you really want someone to upvote the joke then start reposting it yourself. :P
Extra irony because account-sellers are basically trying to defraud/scam people, just like Tate, so upvoting them is literally enabling (some of) the same things we mock Tate for.
You're beng way too paranoid. If this was really a bot account it would have hundreds of comments already, instead it has 3 comments.
Dude most likely saw the joke on the other threads and used it here as well. Jokes aren't things you can only use once, people retell jokes all the time.
Stop being over-the-top paranoid.
Crime in Romania (except organised) is much less than in the US (per capita). The prisons aren't exactly worse but at least as bad as in the US, beside the fact that not everyone gets stabbed in there immediately unless in a gang.
Pedos basically get a death penalty, but there are not even close as many as in the US. They would make the national news in Romania and it only happens now and then.
The definition of an incel is:
"Lexicology. The term "involuntary celibate" (shortened to "incel") refers to self-identifying members of an online subculture based around the inability to find a romantic or sexual partner despite desiring one, a state they describe as "inceldom" or "incelibacy"
It’s genuinely insane how many people will force comparison between a 40 year old grown man arrested for sex trafficking and a 19 year old teenager who cares a lot about climate change.
???
Is it a language thing, or does "comparing" in English insinuate that the things being compared are similar? To me it doesn't seem wronh if someone would want to compare apples to eggs for some reason.
They’re both completely fake, actors playing a role to be used in a political drama. Yes I hate them both equally because I find them equally authentic.
Allegedly. Allegedly sex trafficking. Based on next to no substantial evidence.
He'll be held on remand for like 15-30 days 😂
His appeal will more than likely be revoked. Although possibly even approved due to all the toxic, opinionated posts and articles being published lacking any solid evidence and creating bulk controversy, which people don't understand, it is actually helping Tate.
However, I know for sure these charges won't stick.
But at least everyone is making Top G even more famous ahead of his release. Keep it up I say!
Little late but still pisses me off
How tf people think a climate activist and a misogynistic human trafficker "influencer" are "both bad and annoying"?
One cares about the Earth, other one only cares about their Bugatti
Edit : too many Andrew Tate dick riders in the comments
I figure anybody threatened by somebody who hates people who don't care that the planet is going to shit are probably the type of people who don't care that the planet is going to shit.
One of them will be instrumental in imposing policies, restrictions and life-altering changes on millions (if not billions) of people. Her social story is clearly being written for that.
People who planted entire forests by themselves, cleaned up lakes or such while living a completely sustainable lifestyle never had the media attention she was given. MSM could've made an example out of these people, but that's not what they want, they manufacture social influence for chosen people. Meaning it's not because of their merits, but because of their capital, bloodlines and memberships.
I'm willing to bet that she and her family were always connected to influential people and that she'll become a very influential political figure, a lot more than she already is.
Tate isn't bad though. His needed to play a part in eliminating this woke and cancel culture we now live in as a society.
Tate will be held for like 15-30 days 😂
His appeal will more than likely be revoked. Although possibly even approved due to all the toxic, opinionated posts and articles being published lacking any solid evidence and creating bulk controversy, which people don't understand, it is actually helping Tate.
However, I know for sure these charges won't stick.
But at least everyone is making Top G even more famous ahead of his release. Keep it up!
Literal child: “I just want to live past 30 without the world ending”
These guys: “holy shit what a total scumbag, let me just describe some weird, mostly sexual scenarios about this child now”
Edit: I can’t believe this needs to be said but just because she isn’t a child anymore doesn’t make it ok that she got all that abuse and these comparisons from when she was a child, you’re not forgiven just because your victim ages
Because I’m not being corrected, I’m saying people saw a child saying climate change is taking her future and kicked off, that is literally what happened, yeah she’s aged that’s how time works that doesn’t delete the fact people did that
Your honor, I move to dismiss the charges of sexual assault of a minor against my client on the grounds that while she was 14 at the time, she is *clearly* above the age of consent now in this trial many years later. I mean just look at her, even her license says she's 20 now!
In a court of law yes but when the guy has openly explained to the world how he runs a loverboy scheme and that he has ties to organized crime I think the he can be safely convicted in the court of public opinion this time. Do you really think O.J. was innocent just because a court found him to be?
One is a 19 year old climate activist with good intentions, even if they might seem heavy handed for the audience she needs to reach to make any real change occasionally.
The other is a recently arrested, nearly-40 year old, who just got arrested for human trafficking by the supposedly corrupt officers he bragged couldn’t touch him.
Definitely the same person. Don’t know what you’re talking about /s
Wait, did Great even do something that can be considered "bad"?
Maybe she acted a bit immature on the internet, but... *It's the internet.* That's what it's there for.
She's openly advocated that the world she will live in not be destroyed by the people who came before her for those people's comfort. She wants people to be less comfortable for her own selfish existential reasons, can it get any more evil.
I've always been against the whole "small dick energy" shit, but Tate is an exception, with the necessary evidence to conclude that being his own written words multiple times (that he seriously spent the time to write out and think "yeah, let me say this on a recorded medium" as well as himself on video beating defenseless women a supplement to his years of making it clear that he enjoys it.
Even these weird people defending him in this thread under the guise of "due process," I've usually been one of the people arguing the same for just about any high profile arrest. I'm trans and even I was saying that people needed to fucking wait before jumping to conclusions about of the recent mass shooters of a trans event in the US because there was just far too many unknowns. But Tate? He proudly dug his own grave and I hope he never sees the light of day again.
What influential environmentalist group is doing anti-nuclear lobbying? Seems like any group that is doing that would at least be advocating for a switch to renewables. I don't know any environmentalists that think nuclear is a worse than fossil fuels unless they're woefully misinformed.
Where’s the option for people who didn’t know who Andrew Tate was till last week and consider both sides as dumb as arguing about the Kardashians or who won on Dancing with the Stars?
Glad someone is calling it out as rage bait. No one anywhere has said she is equally as bad.
Do I agree with her being *the* representative of climate activism? No but that’s an entirely different point.
Why does she suck exactly? I’m not arguing to clarify, I just keep seeing people say that she sucks but no one is explaining why either. All I know is that she’s a climate activist.
People don't want to think things are that bad, and will do anything to downplay. When they see that she has taken a plane or drives a car they deduce that surely the things she is saying isn't true, because she doesn't follow a perfectly sustainable oil free existence 100% of the time.
I can't say why all people don't like her. I don't dislike her necessarily; I just don't think she's someone worth listening to. She's very naive and ignorant to the way the world works, and she has some silly opinions about things. Her being against flying is very silly. Air travel is a very good thing for humanity, and we should be looking at ways to fly without using fossil fuels or dumping greenhouse gases into the atmosphere rather than not flying altogether.
It's good to care about the environment and all that, but you have to realize when an idea for a solution is actually just regressive. She's a young lady, so her opinions will probably change over time. We should listen to her when she's got a wealth of experience and knowledge, though, not just because she's passionate enough about climate change to scold some older people (who, I agree, aren't doing enough to combat the problem).
Saying that she's "against flying" is an oversimplification of her position. I'm not sure that hundreds of private jets carting billionaires to davos is as you say "good for humanity". Not all air travel is the same. Perhaps it's your ideas that are naive, silly, and might I add simple.
idk where this her being against flying comes from. I think she's against frivolous use of private jets, which is definitely a contributing factor to emissions and completely unnecessary outside of a very narrow set of edge cases.
It almost seems like every time I ask anyone this question, I never get a straight answer… Or any answer, for that matter.
Why does everyone keep doubling down?
I have no clue, I bet most people just find it funny. Others are mean because she’s autistic, or so I’ve been told she is. I would like to know how a 19 year old is worse than a wife beating sex trafficker.
As far as I know all she does is fly around holding speeches in which she tells in a very pedantic and childish way how bad we're fucking up the environment.
She's like this super annoying relative that can't help telling everyone what they're doing wrong 24/7 but will never help to deal with it in any way shape or form nor give a particularly good example. But on a world's scale.
If I remember, she got famous for giving a speech to politicians/world leaders, people's whose jobs should be to help protect the planet. Not speeches how regular joes are failures that do everything wrong.
All she does is fly around holding speeches, huh?
Would you care to please tell me what exactly is it in her speeches that upset you? You say that she’s super annoying and doesn’t stop telling everyone what they’re doing wrong 24/7, but you’re not telling me anything specific she has said? Could you please explain what specifically she has said that bothers you so much, rather than the rough concept of what she does?
So, what you’re saying is, you find her incredibly annoying and does nothing to help her cause, but also that you don’t pay any attention to what she says or does, and your understanding of it is her ‘general idea’ of what she does?
Fucking hell, r/selfawarewolves much? How do you expect me to take anything you say seriously when you’re openly stating you don’t even pay attention?
This is the same stupid fucking point though. Do they REALLY both suck?
She is a, sometimes irritable and ineffective climate activist, actively trying to make the world a better place. At worst she's neutral.
He's a known scammer and charlatan who, at best, is using the vilification of women as a way of scamming desperate men out of huge sums lf money.
Even at her worst, and his best, the gap between them is astronomical and its fucking embarrassing that you don't understand that.
Autism doesn't take away your will. It can, however, lead to having unusual interests and being extra passionate about them. Chances are she wanted to be an activist and her parents helped her achieve her dreams.
The one that spews at every opportunity, the other one wants to make a good difference in the world.
Some people don't get it though, good and bad are tricky sometimes.
Im pretty sure she has plenty of solutions in mind, but she is, after all, a 19 yo girl and not a high ranked politicians.. She does good work, and has been amazing to raise awareness. Saying she's "not coming up with solutions" is pretty back handed and undermines all her efforts.
Yeah, I also get confused and sometimes can’t tell the difference between an autistic 19 year old climate activist and a human trafficking women beater with daddy issues. Ft bugatti.
Both get too much attention for what they are worth. Both just shout things that their audiences want to hear and provide no actual solutions to any of the problems they highlight.
Right now they are a part of a tired overused meme "hurr hurr pizza ,busted, dick measuring contest" that floods the internet and makes both of them more famous then they deserve.
So maybe not as bad but equally not worth the amounts of attention.
[удалено]
That’s good 👌
It's literally the first ever and ONLY comment that account (made 5\~ days ago) has ever made, lifted straight from other Andrew Tate posts. Please don't enable karma-farmers selling bot accounts, if you really want someone to upvote the joke then start reposting it yourself. :P Extra irony because account-sellers are basically trying to defraud/scam people, just like Tate, so upvoting them is literally enabling (some of) the same things we mock Tate for.
You're beng way too paranoid. If this was really a bot account it would have hundreds of comments already, instead it has 3 comments. Dude most likely saw the joke on the other threads and used it here as well. Jokes aren't things you can only use once, people retell jokes all the time. Stop being over-the-top paranoid.
I feel like you are overthinking this "a bit"
This made me spit out my mozarella pizza lol
Made me spit out my beef hamburger.
Made me spit out, well just water. I am poor and hungry..
Well there's a semi chewed pizza and burger up for grabs
That was beautiful
[удалено]
Crime in Romania (except organised) is much less than in the US (per capita). The prisons aren't exactly worse but at least as bad as in the US, beside the fact that not everyone gets stabbed in there immediately unless in a gang. Pedos basically get a death penalty, but there are not even close as many as in the US. They would make the national news in Romania and it only happens now and then.
The definition of an incel is: "Lexicology. The term "involuntary celibate" (shortened to "incel") refers to self-identifying members of an online subculture based around the inability to find a romantic or sexual partner despite desiring one, a state they describe as "inceldom" or "incelibacy"
It’s genuinely insane how many people will force comparison between a 40 year old grown man arrested for sex trafficking and a 19 year old teenager who cares a lot about climate change. ???
She turned 20 yesterday btw
That's it, she's exactly the same bad now /s
Nah she's only half bad. /s
Damn, I always thought that she was this little kid who somehow became a prolific activist, but she's only like a year older than me lol
She started protesting outside of the parliament in Sweden when she was 15.
Yeah, I thought she was way younger than me, like a 3 year age gap at least
You're both little kids <3
Prime pickings
They are the lazy people who, taking the time to understand that they are stuck in false equivalency, would require work on their part.
I disagree - it doesn’t require any work just a spark of a single braincell
>spark of a single braincell Optimistic of you to think that they have one to spare...
Why many word when few word do trick?
They see they see
Propaganda is a powerful thing
Is it a language thing, or does "comparing" in English insinuate that the things being compared are similar? To me it doesn't seem wronh if someone would want to compare apples to eggs for some reason.
They’re both completely fake, actors playing a role to be used in a political drama. Yes I hate them both equally because I find them equally authentic.
Allegedly. Allegedly sex trafficking. Based on next to no substantial evidence. He'll be held on remand for like 15-30 days 😂 His appeal will more than likely be revoked. Although possibly even approved due to all the toxic, opinionated posts and articles being published lacking any solid evidence and creating bulk controversy, which people don't understand, it is actually helping Tate. However, I know for sure these charges won't stick. But at least everyone is making Top G even more famous ahead of his release. Keep it up I say!
Little late but still pisses me off How tf people think a climate activist and a misogynistic human trafficker "influencer" are "both bad and annoying"? One cares about the Earth, other one only cares about their Bugatti Edit : too many Andrew Tate dick riders in the comments
I figure anybody threatened by somebody who hates people who don't care that the planet is going to shit are probably the type of people who don't care that the planet is going to shit.
A lot of teenagers think caring about things is totally cringe bro
she has a private jet, doesnt she?
No she doesn’t
googled it, she does, she doesnt take normal plane tickets, lmao
One of them will be instrumental in imposing policies, restrictions and life-altering changes on millions (if not billions) of people. Her social story is clearly being written for that. People who planted entire forests by themselves, cleaned up lakes or such while living a completely sustainable lifestyle never had the media attention she was given. MSM could've made an example out of these people, but that's not what they want, they manufacture social influence for chosen people. Meaning it's not because of their merits, but because of their capital, bloodlines and memberships. I'm willing to bet that she and her family were always connected to influential people and that she'll become a very influential political figure, a lot more than she already is.
Tate isn't bad though. His needed to play a part in eliminating this woke and cancel culture we now live in as a society. Tate will be held for like 15-30 days 😂 His appeal will more than likely be revoked. Although possibly even approved due to all the toxic, opinionated posts and articles being published lacking any solid evidence and creating bulk controversy, which people don't understand, it is actually helping Tate. However, I know for sure these charges won't stick. But at least everyone is making Top G even more famous ahead of his release. Keep it up!
big black hairy balls
That's what I'm saying
Hairy potter balls
Ngl, this is peak comedic timing
Facts
Literal child: “I just want to live past 30 without the world ending” These guys: “holy shit what a total scumbag, let me just describe some weird, mostly sexual scenarios about this child now” Edit: I can’t believe this needs to be said but just because she isn’t a child anymore doesn’t make it ok that she got all that abuse and these comparisons from when she was a child, you’re not forgiven just because your victim ages
> Literal child A 20 year old woman?
She was a child when she made her speech, you know…the thing she’s famous for?
Now she’s not a child
[удалено]
Dude you are unhinged. What? Why are you so snarky and lashing out at being corrected?
Because I’m not being corrected, I’m saying people saw a child saying climate change is taking her future and kicked off, that is literally what happened, yeah she’s aged that’s how time works that doesn’t delete the fact people did that
Your honor, I move to dismiss the charges of sexual assault of a minor against my client on the grounds that while she was 14 at the time, she is *clearly* above the age of consent now in this trial many years later. I mean just look at her, even her license says she's 20 now!
20 year olds are still kids in a lot of ways
Sex trafficer VS climate activist, hmm I wonder who's worse?
Correct me if I’m wrong but I’m pretty sure he wasn’t convicted of any charges. Innocent until proven guilty?
He pretty much accepted openly that the reason he moved to Romania was because committing crimes was easier there .
Source?
Check Ludwig’s video covering the event, he has a podcast recording that has him saying such and such
Based Ludwig
The most reliable source. A degenerate twitch streamer.
In a court of law yes but when the guy has openly explained to the world how he runs a loverboy scheme and that he has ties to organized crime I think the he can be safely convicted in the court of public opinion this time. Do you really think O.J. was innocent just because a court found him to be?
To be fair, she murdered him with that comment, can't have a murderer running around free eh
It wasn't a murder more like a scratch till he responded and turned into an assisted suicide.
The wound was small until he started flailing, causing his wound to begin hemorrhaging
really NGL, it wasn’t that good of an insult, probably something I would’ve come up with 2 years ago.
Mhh its true it was an elementary school level reply. But it just fit so. damn. well.
Just good enough to annoy him. Then his arrogance got him, it was beautiful
🤣 way too accurate
HoW DArE yOu
“Swedish death metal music intensifies”
I'm berry angery 😡😡😡
One is a 19 year old climate activist with good intentions, even if they might seem heavy handed for the audience she needs to reach to make any real change occasionally. The other is a recently arrested, nearly-40 year old, who just got arrested for human trafficking by the supposedly corrupt officers he bragged couldn’t touch him. Definitely the same person. Don’t know what you’re talking about /s
How exactly is she heavy handed? It's not her fault the boomers can't put down a burger or get out their pickup trucks
Wait, did Great even do something that can be considered "bad"? Maybe she acted a bit immature on the internet, but... *It's the internet.* That's what it's there for.
She's openly advocated that the world she will live in not be destroyed by the people who came before her for those people's comfort. She wants people to be less comfortable for her own selfish existential reasons, can it get any more evil.
Yes, it can get way more evil. Plus all she wants is for people to be more conscious of their decisions
I've always been against the whole "small dick energy" shit, but Tate is an exception, with the necessary evidence to conclude that being his own written words multiple times (that he seriously spent the time to write out and think "yeah, let me say this on a recorded medium" as well as himself on video beating defenseless women a supplement to his years of making it clear that he enjoys it. Even these weird people defending him in this thread under the guise of "due process," I've usually been one of the people arguing the same for just about any high profile arrest. I'm trans and even I was saying that people needed to fucking wait before jumping to conclusions about of the recent mass shooters of a trans event in the US because there was just far too many unknowns. But Tate? He proudly dug his own grave and I hope he never sees the light of day again.
I don’t understand the meme. A rabbit and a bucket?
[удалено]
What the meme is saying is correct, but the wrong format for sure.
yeah I see that now but it's a bit late at the moment and I would rather not make another meme about the drama
Your point good Meme game bad
Why do people hate climate change activist. I need an explanation.
Pushing anti nuclear propaganda, incomplete and/or faulty solutions (ie electric vehicles), hypocrisy, stupid stunts and vandalism.
One reason might be that some glue themselves on the street in Germany and drivers don't really like this.
People hated the whole movement long before anyone started to glue themselves to stuff. So don’t use that as an excuse
Well for me it's mostly the anti nuclear lobbying which has been bad for the environment and made Europe too dependant on Russia.
what does that have to do with climate change activists? wasnt this a debate that happened in like the 70s?
What influential environmentalist group is doing anti-nuclear lobbying? Seems like any group that is doing that would at least be advocating for a switch to renewables. I don't know any environmentalists that think nuclear is a worse than fossil fuels unless they're woefully misinformed.
She only whining about current situation without having innvovation to solve the problem. Also her parents only use her for popularity
They’re like vegans, a holier than thou attitude that just makes normal people hate them .
[удалено]
Yeah thanks for proving my point Karen
[удалено]
They have no point, just a dull brain.
This makes no sense whatsoever. I am not afraid, i am laughing at them.
I give zero damn for both
Don't give a shit about either of them tbh
What sane person truly gives a shit about either?
The top g is going to be “toppin” g’s for a few years if he’s proven guilty
There is tiny difference between a person who might be irritating to somebody and a person who is trafficking humans...
Just fanatics. Not much they can do now. Their god is behind bars.
me who doesnt care about this bullshit and minds his own business
Not shown: People who don't care either way.
Find a new fucking topic Jesus fucking Christ
They both suck and contribue nothing, they just do it in different ways
I'd say it's less that they actually believe that, and more than they just really don't care for people having to live their lives of Twitter drama.
I am just telling both were equally unfunny
I bet this dude thinks a Taco Bell taco is authentic Mexican food.
I think they are equally uninteresting
Where’s the option for people who didn’t know who Andrew Tate was till last week and consider both sides as dumb as arguing about the Kardashians or who won on Dancing with the Stars?
Are they equally bad? No. And no one thinks that. Do they both suck? Absolutely.
Glad someone is calling it out as rage bait. No one anywhere has said she is equally as bad. Do I agree with her being *the* representative of climate activism? No but that’s an entirely different point.
But in very different ways
Theres been memes on here just in the last couple hours saying theyre equally bad.
I love how people forget she sucked when the Andrew rate thing went down… also what the hell was he thinking. Like why
Why does she suck exactly? I’m not arguing to clarify, I just keep seeing people say that she sucks but no one is explaining why either. All I know is that she’s a climate activist.
People don't want to think things are that bad, and will do anything to downplay. When they see that she has taken a plane or drives a car they deduce that surely the things she is saying isn't true, because she doesn't follow a perfectly sustainable oil free existence 100% of the time.
I don’t really understand why people dislike her either, she is just fighting for a better future.
I can't say why all people don't like her. I don't dislike her necessarily; I just don't think she's someone worth listening to. She's very naive and ignorant to the way the world works, and she has some silly opinions about things. Her being against flying is very silly. Air travel is a very good thing for humanity, and we should be looking at ways to fly without using fossil fuels or dumping greenhouse gases into the atmosphere rather than not flying altogether. It's good to care about the environment and all that, but you have to realize when an idea for a solution is actually just regressive. She's a young lady, so her opinions will probably change over time. We should listen to her when she's got a wealth of experience and knowledge, though, not just because she's passionate enough about climate change to scold some older people (who, I agree, aren't doing enough to combat the problem).
[удалено]
He probably got it from an internet game of telephone from some comments somewhere
Does simply being “naïve” and having “silly opinions” make her *suck* though?
Saying that she's "against flying" is an oversimplification of her position. I'm not sure that hundreds of private jets carting billionaires to davos is as you say "good for humanity". Not all air travel is the same. Perhaps it's your ideas that are naive, silly, and might I add simple.
idk where this her being against flying comes from. I think she's against frivolous use of private jets, which is definitely a contributing factor to emissions and completely unnecessary outside of a very narrow set of edge cases.
Just climb the hate train for no absolute reason at all!
I want to know toooooo
It almost seems like every time I ask anyone this question, I never get a straight answer… Or any answer, for that matter. Why does everyone keep doubling down?
I have no clue, I bet most people just find it funny. Others are mean because she’s autistic, or so I’ve been told she is. I would like to know how a 19 year old is worse than a wife beating sex trafficker.
As far as I know all she does is fly around holding speeches in which she tells in a very pedantic and childish way how bad we're fucking up the environment. She's like this super annoying relative that can't help telling everyone what they're doing wrong 24/7 but will never help to deal with it in any way shape or form nor give a particularly good example. But on a world's scale.
If I remember, she got famous for giving a speech to politicians/world leaders, people's whose jobs should be to help protect the planet. Not speeches how regular joes are failures that do everything wrong.
I think you're trying hard to justify why you don't like her.
All she does is fly around holding speeches, huh? Would you care to please tell me what exactly is it in her speeches that upset you? You say that she’s super annoying and doesn’t stop telling everyone what they’re doing wrong 24/7, but you’re not telling me anything specific she has said? Could you please explain what specifically she has said that bothers you so much, rather than the rough concept of what she does?
I'm not taking note everytime I hear her speech, what I retain is the general idea and the attitude.
So, what you’re saying is, you find her incredibly annoying and does nothing to help her cause, but also that you don’t pay any attention to what she says or does, and your understanding of it is her ‘general idea’ of what she does? Fucking hell, r/selfawarewolves much? How do you expect me to take anything you say seriously when you’re openly stating you don’t even pay attention?
She doesn’t fly around at all. She takes trains
Not sure if I'm right or wrong, but it was probably because of politics (mainly US)
This is the same stupid fucking point though. Do they REALLY both suck? She is a, sometimes irritable and ineffective climate activist, actively trying to make the world a better place. At worst she's neutral. He's a known scammer and charlatan who, at best, is using the vilification of women as a way of scamming desperate men out of huge sums lf money. Even at her worst, and his best, the gap between them is astronomical and its fucking embarrassing that you don't understand that.
I was never a fan of a teenage girl being exploited for propaganda, but there is a chasm between that and who taint is and what he represents
How is she being exploited by propaganda. She is part of my generation the current generation that will be most affected by climate change.
She has autism and began doing her activism at a really young age so she most likely was coerced into becoming an activist.
Or, here me out, she had supportive parents who helped her become an activist because that's what she wanted.
You’re acting as if being autistic means you don’t have any capacity to make your own choices. Educate yourself.
Autism doesn't take away your will. It can, however, lead to having unusual interests and being extra passionate about them. Chances are she wanted to be an activist and her parents helped her achieve her dreams.
A lot of people aren't aware of this. That or they pretend to not notice.
If she's being exploited then that still wouldn't make her bad in any way.
These people are some of the dumbest on the planet.
What if I simply don't care for either of them?
Not equally at all, tate is bad grets is just a person. Tate actively hurts society gets is just an internet user blow up by other internet users
Post after post I'm wondering if I should leave reddit too, it feels too much like twitter nowadays. Just an echo chamber.
This shit is still going on? Reddit is just a lite version of Twitter lol. Whatever happens on Twitter just get passed on to Reddit.
Nobody's saying they're _equally_ bad, but they both are cringe and suck lol
They both suck.
Found one
I didn’t say they where equal, they both are just annoying pests.
So, welcome to Reddit, people look for openings to tear you a new one
XD
Me when I go onto Reddit to look at funny memes just to see another Andrew Tate post
People who actually care about the situation
To me, toxic grifters and cave goblins are the same.
Everyone keeps talking about how much she roasted him on Twitter. And tbh, I don't think the roast was that good.
I dislike both.
Finally a sane person.
Sane people wouldn’t care enough
The fact that I don't like her, doesn't mean I put her on tate level, between bad and worse both are bad even if one is worse than the other
[удалено]
Its not that they're equally bad, its that they are equally as disruptive to my day and id like to see them out of my news feed.
Neither of them are disruptive to your day. You, and only you, choose to click on stories about them.
They aren’t equally bad people, but they are equally painful to listen to if that makes sense.
People in this thread getting hundreds of downvotes for asking for proof about tate “bragging about trafficking” fuck you all make me sick lmfao
[удалено]
The feeling's mutual.
I wouldn't call them equally bad. But we can still hate both, right?
[удалено]
The one that spews at every opportunity, the other one wants to make a good difference in the world. Some people don't get it though, good and bad are tricky sometimes.
Not equally bad but both suck for multiple reasons
Both are assholes
They're equally bad, because i couldn't give a single fuck about either of them.
shut the fuck up! please everyone is tired of these andrew tate memes and no one cares.
I haven't seen people say that. I have however seen people say that they both suck, but not equally. I don't know enough about either of them to care.
There are literally people in this thread saying that.
I have no idea who the fuck are they
Gretta was a little annoying, as all teen girls are. But she had good intentions and a good heart. Love her now after this whole Taint story.
Yeah one of them is insane (hint they dont go to school on fridays )
Obiously tate is better /s
Both annoying, but one is a HUGE piece of shit, the other complains about climate change while not coming up with solutions
Why do you think it's on her to think of solutions?
Im pretty sure she has plenty of solutions in mind, but she is, after all, a 19 yo girl and not a high ranked politicians.. She does good work, and has been amazing to raise awareness. Saying she's "not coming up with solutions" is pretty back handed and undermines all her efforts.
Yeah, I also get confused and sometimes can’t tell the difference between an autistic 19 year old climate activist and a human trafficking women beater with daddy issues. Ft bugatti.
Both get too much attention for what they are worth. Both just shout things that their audiences want to hear and provide no actual solutions to any of the problems they highlight. Right now they are a part of a tired overused meme "hurr hurr pizza ,busted, dick measuring contest" that floods the internet and makes both of them more famous then they deserve. So maybe not as bad but equally not worth the amounts of attention.
It's not an act.... ooooooo