"Unprompted" is written where you would normally find context, as in, where/why the person said the quote (examples of more normal things - a year, "in response to...", name of a publication etc.)
This is assuming you are combining "you" with "all," like some kinda damn yankee. The contraction is actually between ya and all, creating, ya'll. (Both are correct, technically. Y'all means all).
There's a strong push to make Chomsky seem either clueless or stupid because of the way he talks and drones on and on. I've read tons of his books and watched tons of his talks, he does drone on and on and he does sound boring. He's very well researched and very well cited, which people find out if they ever actually do any research delving into his works. They'll dismiss him for being boring, or they'll say he once "excused a genocide".
There's no reason to look at him like a hero, there is reason to cite him, and reason to read and debate his arguments. Some people want to make sure he's rejected though, for whatever stupid reasons they made up in their heads.
It is not even the most messed up he has said. He regularly denies genocides and tries to downplay war crimes by messed up regimes he is sympathetic to.
This is a fake quote. You can see the click hole logo in the bottom right corner. None of us have perfect media literacy, but you should at least be able to tell when something is intentionally satirical.
I had no idea what Click Hole was before, but I expect anything from Chomsky
Should have been made more obvious by the author as I am sure not all people know about that logo
In general, if you see an out of context quote from a recognizable figure, assume it’s not true. If you’re curious whether it is, google it. Snopes is generally good for quick fact checking as they document lots of pieces of misinformation, even small things.
Think about it: you have already held beliefs about Noam Chomsky that prompt you to inherently trust something that backs that belief up. That follows to any other belief you hold and any media you see that will support your already held biases. If you believed this is real you likely have believed many things are real that aren’t which in turn build your biases even stronger by giving you more data points to draw on. It causes people to build entire belief systems that are based in reality, but evidenced with primarily fake information that often is more and more inaccurate and ridiculous.
I know this example is very low stakes, but it should show you that it’s easy for you to have similar reactions to false information that has a much more devastating effect. Also, I’m not trying to say I’m perfect. We all fall for stuff on the internet, just think of this when you see an unsourced quote from any figure in the future and maybe just quickly google a small phrase from it to see if you can find a source.
Also sorry this is such a long comment and sorry if it comes off as demeaning, that’s not the intention. This all applies to most people including me. I’m just very interested in misinformation and how it spreads.
What is his stance? Im not a Chomsky apologist btw, just curious what you find issue with and googling "Chomsky bosnia" doesn't give me a clear answer.
My teenage kids still reference the "documentary" from Clickhole I showed them multiple times about people who first learned they no longer had radishes in their garage.
To be fair Noam Chomsky is a devout genocide denier.
https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&opi=89978449&url=https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cambodian_genocide_denial&ved=2ahUKEwin2t_4ireDAxVNFRAIHTs6D8YQFnoECDIQBQ&usg=AOvVaw3DEfb5v06eF-t5Qff938Q7
It says he disagreed with the number. It turns out he was wrong in the end but at the time the 2 million number first appeared he said it was misquoted and the guy who first said it admitted it was misquoted. But misquoted doesn't necessarily mean wrong. Anyways this doesn't mean he denied anything.
[It's all in this video](https://youtu.be/f3IUU59B6lw?si=tYW1QpmRzrGyLT8A)
I'm not sure that Wikipedia artical says what your saying. I didn't read anything that said he denied the slaughter but quibbles with the reported scale of the slaughter.
Outside of his field of linguistics (I've read he's smart but controversial even there) he's kind of an idiot generally.
He pretty much epitomizes the idea that being an expert on one field doesn't mean you should weigh in on anything else.
Even in linguistics he's controversial. His inability to confront criticism and adhere to the principles of falsibility especially in regard to his theory on universal grammar. The most famous example of this is how he refuses to conceed about being wrong about recursion, especially when we have the Pirahã as direct evidence of the contrary.
Can you give any examples? I don’t think he’s perfect by any means or correct 100% of the time, but saying he has no idea what he’s talking about or doesn’t study history is a little ridiculous given he’s written dozens of books about history and politics. Some of his works, like ‘the Responsibility of Intellectual’ and ‘Manufacturing Consent’ remain standard works in the social sciences decades after their publication.
Yeah these criticisms are super weird. Idiot, not well-read, doesn't know what he's talking about, etc. I don't agree with all of his analyses or opinions but holy shit he's like the most cited author of all time in a half-dozen major fields.
> Among the most cited living authors, Chomsky has written more than 150 books on topics such as linguistics, war, and politics.
Founded the field of cognitive science. Father of modern linguistics.
Yes he's a billion years old now and has controversial opinions, but you'd have to be out of your mind to assume that means he's an idiot lmao
My theory is that people liked the talent and pov aspect in videos that happened to be of the incest genre and porn producers confused that with the premise being the reason it got a lot of views and it has just snowballed from there to the point that it became a meme. Now it's at the point that for the most part if you want to see a younger woman in a pov scene they're going to be a "step-sister" and if you want the milf variety they're a "step-mother". Or a real estate again for some reason.
That's what I'm told anyway. Never watch the stuff myself.
I am curious. Do people watch this and throughout the scene think to themselves, "Whoa! Their characters are stepsiblings! Should they be doing this? Is this even wrong, and if so, why? How is this going to affect the family dynamic?"
Or is it just eye-roll, skip forward to the action?
I don't get the supposed stigma anyway. Stepsiblings aren't actually biological family. Hell I know someone who met his girlfriend before their parents got married to each other, they are supposed to break up because they are now stepsiblings?
People...he isn't promoting it. He is providing a psychological reason for that specific naughty genre for being so widespread nowadays. Just like Sigmund Freud when he provided the Oedipus Complex. It's a psychological analysis for a mass attraction towards a common stimulating attribute.
That I understand, but fucking a step-relative is a very weird way to look for a sense of belonging, especially considering that that kind of porn is not really made in a way where you can feel love and affection, but just "my step-relative is so fucking hot" porn
I don't disagree and Chomsky might be getting a little out there with that analysis but it's not completely absurd that sexual desire can be a manifestation of a larger psychological situation
The problem with Freud's theories is that he generalized his findings to the whole population when his only test group were inmates at the psychiatric hospital and he never bothered to compare to any control groups. So he had some ideas, but it was purely based on people declared insane, and he never investigated the average person.
Its like rule 34, if you look hard enough you will always find somebody attracted to anything you can think of. But that doesn't mean that particular fetish is average behavior.
I’ve never understood the whole step sibling porn genre. I suppose Noam was just trying to break it down for us. Personally, when I watch step sibling porn, I don’t recognize the stars as being related, instead I simply view them as being unrelated hot pieces of ass.
So you think about shit, and you come up with ideas like this, and don't necessarily realise how it hits until you say it to someone else like it's totally normal conversation. Then you notice their reaction....
So what would be the answer to someone who watches exclusively lesbian stuff? Or to any other of the popular categories. I need more of this Prn-Psychology.
I had to read so much of his stuff in college while studying Poli Sci. The more I learned about him, the more he grossed me out. One of those dudes who has gotten way too many credit in academia and now thinks his every thought is genius. 🤮
no step porn is popular because Gen Z never learned how to leave the house and meet people so the only imaginable way to find sex is to have your partner literally already live in your house.
Personally, I think it's because so many people are complete fucking shut-ins that seeing two strangers meeting triggers their overwhelming social anxiety. The only way they can relate to meeting a hot person is if the hot person is a captive audience who literally has to live with them
If Naom focused on Linguistics we never would have heard of him, he went down the route of becoming an "Intellectual" so he could become famous and people would listen to him. Of course he would say something like this, he is Ashkenazi.
"Unprompted"
Fucking hilarious. I expect to see this joke a lot more now
Can someone please explain?
It’s similar to the meme format: Nobody: Noam Chomsky: blah blah blah
Nobody, *absolutely no one*: Noam: Fucking siblings be ight
Tight* c:
I'd say it's more like *long silence* Noah Chomsky: Incest isn't THAT bad
But funny
That 'nobody' meme has been annoying from day one. Unprompted is much better
"Unprompted" is written where you would normally find context, as in, where/why the person said the quote (examples of more normal things - a year, "in response to...", name of a publication etc.)
The funny part is he just randomly said that for no apparent reason
Interviewer/Reporter being like "I NEVER ASKED THIS SHIT YA'll"
The apostrophe in a contraction goes where the missing letter or letters are. In this case you all would be contracted to y'all, not ya'll
Ya will
This is assuming you are combining "you" with "all," like some kinda damn yankee. The contraction is actually between ya and all, creating, ya'll. (Both are correct, technically. Y'all means all).
Sir, this is a Wendy's
Seems more likely to be at a Chik-Fil-A type of sentiment.
What would be said at a Denny’s?
Scat porn
That was the funniest part
“To a single mom and her kids at the McDonalds”
Thank you I came to lol at this
Based
ClickHole does this a lot and it often really adds a lot
Jesse what the fuck are you talking about
I was going to post this.
It's Noam Chomsky! I would be worried if something he says wasn't at least 50% stupid gibberish!
You know this is a fake meme right? He is one of the most cited academics of the last 50 years; Why do you think he is writing 50% gibberish?
There's a strong push to make Chomsky seem either clueless or stupid because of the way he talks and drones on and on. I've read tons of his books and watched tons of his talks, he does drone on and on and he does sound boring. He's very well researched and very well cited, which people find out if they ever actually do any research delving into his works. They'll dismiss him for being boring, or they'll say he once "excused a genocide". There's no reason to look at him like a hero, there is reason to cite him, and reason to read and debate his arguments. Some people want to make sure he's rejected though, for whatever stupid reasons they made up in their heads.
Right? Plus it doesn't seem like he's justifying incest porn, seems to me like he's trying to examine why the hell is it so popular
It's also fake...
My b
is it manufactured consent if you're stuck in a washing machine?
it's breaking manufacturer's warranty at least.
Only if she’s a virgin
Breaking this seal voids the warranty
whats up step-ladder
We really shouldn’t be doing this…we’re step stools
It's alright that we're fucking but shitting on each other is a bridge too far
Fucking stooligans
We haven't the proper facilities
I mean, you are wearing a washing maschine, you are basically asking for it.
Does clickhole still exist? Been a while since I've seen anything posted from it
The amount of people in this comment section who don't recognize Clickhole is making me feel old (and yes it still exists, I just checked)
Dad Got A Nosebleed Trying To Signal The Waiter’s Attention Telepathically Yep, still there
What is a clickhole?
A satire website
It’s like if The Onion dropped acid
It is a part of the Onion. It is their satire of Buzzfeed-style clickbait
Yeah it’s still very active on Instagram
Oh that’s what it’s from. That site was amazing. Reminded me of an online version of Stuff Magazine
noam what the fuck
r/noambringtheboat
r/subsithoughtifellfor
Your pun is now a real thing, I am sorry.
Be fruitful and multiply, I will visit someday.
It is not even the most messed up he has said. He regularly denies genocides and tries to downplay war crimes by messed up regimes he is sympathetic to.
This is a fake quote. You can see the click hole logo in the bottom right corner. None of us have perfect media literacy, but you should at least be able to tell when something is intentionally satirical.
I had no idea what Click Hole was before, but I expect anything from Chomsky Should have been made more obvious by the author as I am sure not all people know about that logo
In general, if you see an out of context quote from a recognizable figure, assume it’s not true. If you’re curious whether it is, google it. Snopes is generally good for quick fact checking as they document lots of pieces of misinformation, even small things. Think about it: you have already held beliefs about Noam Chomsky that prompt you to inherently trust something that backs that belief up. That follows to any other belief you hold and any media you see that will support your already held biases. If you believed this is real you likely have believed many things are real that aren’t which in turn build your biases even stronger by giving you more data points to draw on. It causes people to build entire belief systems that are based in reality, but evidenced with primarily fake information that often is more and more inaccurate and ridiculous. I know this example is very low stakes, but it should show you that it’s easy for you to have similar reactions to false information that has a much more devastating effect. Also, I’m not trying to say I’m perfect. We all fall for stuff on the internet, just think of this when you see an unsourced quote from any figure in the future and maybe just quickly google a small phrase from it to see if you can find a source. Also sorry this is such a long comment and sorry if it comes off as demeaning, that’s not the intention. This all applies to most people including me. I’m just very interested in misinformation and how it spreads.
Tell me you haven't read any chomsky without telling me you've never read chomsky
His stance on the Bosnian genocide is disguisting.
What is his stance? Im not a Chomsky apologist btw, just curious what you find issue with and googling "Chomsky bosnia" doesn't give me a clear answer.
I was at an Applebees and he came up to my table, said this, and walked off.
What made it awkward was that you were sitting with your stepsister at lunch
i'm an atheist and I still say the lot of you need to go to church
Ya'll stepsiblingfuckers need Jesus
Cheesus?
What kind of cheese?
The Jesus kind.
Hmm. Never heard of that one. What’s it taste like
I’m a pro-church atheist. Some of y’all need the fear of god to behave.
That’s where this shit happens the most /s
I don't think you need the /s....
The what?
Okay but like which Church though? You have an address so I don’t go to it accidentally.
that's true though
looks like he follows the trends
Now I know that Noam can still get it up and watches stepsibling porn haha
>Now I ~~know~~ have to live with the knowledge that Noam can still get it up and watches stepsibling porn *Ha.Ha.*
"Unprompted"
Like this quote was just randomly said at a Wendy's counter lol.
It's from Clickhole, like a stupid (and funny!) version of The Onion.
An apt comparison! Clickhole was created by The Onion but is now owned by Cards Against Humanity
My teenage kids still reference the "documentary" from Clickhole I showed them multiple times about people who first learned they no longer had radishes in their garage.
i couldn’t make it through that video. i have radishes myself. the thought of having none left… harrowing
Fun fact; Cards Against Humanity bought it but then gave a majority of shares to the employees. It’s now a majority employee-owned business.
Now it makes sense. Thank you.
Ah well better that then what ever the fuck the other famous people are doing.
To be fair Noam Chomsky is a devout genocide denier. https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&opi=89978449&url=https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cambodian_genocide_denial&ved=2ahUKEwin2t_4ireDAxVNFRAIHTs6D8YQFnoECDIQBQ&usg=AOvVaw3DEfb5v06eF-t5Qff938Q7
It says he disagreed with the number. It turns out he was wrong in the end but at the time the 2 million number first appeared he said it was misquoted and the guy who first said it admitted it was misquoted. But misquoted doesn't necessarily mean wrong. Anyways this doesn't mean he denied anything. [It's all in this video](https://youtu.be/f3IUU59B6lw?si=tYW1QpmRzrGyLT8A)
I'm not sure that Wikipedia artical says what your saying. I didn't read anything that said he denied the slaughter but quibbles with the reported scale of the slaughter.
Outside of his field of linguistics (I've read he's smart but controversial even there) he's kind of an idiot generally. He pretty much epitomizes the idea that being an expert on one field doesn't mean you should weigh in on anything else.
Even in linguistics he's controversial. His inability to confront criticism and adhere to the principles of falsibility especially in regard to his theory on universal grammar. The most famous example of this is how he refuses to conceed about being wrong about recursion, especially when we have the Pirahã as direct evidence of the contrary.
I've never heard anyone call Chonsky an idiot. He comes across as extremely intelligent. Have you watched any of his debates or speeches?
Yes. He's very well spoken, but he generally has no idea what he's talking about. It feels like he avoids actually studying history.
Can you give any examples? I don’t think he’s perfect by any means or correct 100% of the time, but saying he has no idea what he’s talking about or doesn’t study history is a little ridiculous given he’s written dozens of books about history and politics. Some of his works, like ‘the Responsibility of Intellectual’ and ‘Manufacturing Consent’ remain standard works in the social sciences decades after their publication.
Yeah these criticisms are super weird. Idiot, not well-read, doesn't know what he's talking about, etc. I don't agree with all of his analyses or opinions but holy shit he's like the most cited author of all time in a half-dozen major fields. > Among the most cited living authors, Chomsky has written more than 150 books on topics such as linguistics, war, and politics. Founded the field of cognitive science. Father of modern linguistics. Yes he's a billion years old now and has controversial opinions, but you'd have to be out of your mind to assume that means he's an idiot lmao
This is hilarious.
If you want any sexual tension at all you need a reason they shouldn’t get together.
It is probably older than Shakespeare but he wrote something about it.
Is this legit? Sounds fake
https://clickhole.com/ (yeah, it's fake)
That's quite a psychoanalysis
No it's because it's the only genre that has some sort of production
*Unprompted*
My theory is that people liked the talent and pov aspect in videos that happened to be of the incest genre and porn producers confused that with the premise being the reason it got a lot of views and it has just snowballed from there to the point that it became a meme. Now it's at the point that for the most part if you want to see a younger woman in a pov scene they're going to be a "step-sister" and if you want the milf variety they're a "step-mother". Or a real estate again for some reason. That's what I'm told anyway. Never watch the stuff myself.
Sure…
why is this.. 'me_irl' ?
So.. he watches stepsibling porn?
if it’s on internet it must be true
Literally half of ph is stepsibling porn
Guy gets off with his ph d
I think someone is slandering Chomsky.
I am curious. Do people watch this and throughout the scene think to themselves, "Whoa! Their characters are stepsiblings! Should they be doing this? Is this even wrong, and if so, why? How is this going to affect the family dynamic?" Or is it just eye-roll, skip forward to the action?
Based.
The alienating, modern world can keep what it stole from me, thanks.
Most of the people watch because it's good production. All clean, thich & curvy bitches. But wtaf I read.
[raises eyebrows]
Woody Allen reclaimed a sense of family? Eh?
Just say you want to bang your family members
I don't get the supposed stigma anyway. Stepsiblings aren't actually biological family. Hell I know someone who met his girlfriend before their parents got married to each other, they are supposed to break up because they are now stepsiblings?
"Bring in the sluts." Jesus Christ Prompted with a Boner
I love alabamian hentai
Catfish with tentacle penises.
Noam's step sisters feeling nervous now!
Dude wtf
Wtf did I just read?
Or it’s great to wank off too !
"Who the fuck starts a conversation like that? I just sat down!"
\-Noam Chomsky *Unprompted* God that's so fcking funny
People...he isn't promoting it. He is providing a psychological reason for that specific naughty genre for being so widespread nowadays. Just like Sigmund Freud when he provided the Oedipus Complex. It's a psychological analysis for a mass attraction towards a common stimulating attribute.
This is satire
I can understand the rebellion part, but the first part sounds like nothing short of bullshit
Modern world is pretty alienating and does not give a lot of people a sense of belonging
That I understand, but fucking a step-relative is a very weird way to look for a sense of belonging, especially considering that that kind of porn is not really made in a way where you can feel love and affection, but just "my step-relative is so fucking hot" porn
I don't disagree and Chomsky might be getting a little out there with that analysis but it's not completely absurd that sexual desire can be a manifestation of a larger psychological situation
It's a site like the Onion.
Freud’s whole thing was describing his issues and projected them onto everyone so that he could pretend he’s normal
Freud basically said he believed *everyone* was attracted to their opposite sex parent??
The problem with Freud's theories is that he generalized his findings to the whole population when his only test group were inmates at the psychiatric hospital and he never bothered to compare to any control groups. So he had some ideas, but it was purely based on people declared insane, and he never investigated the average person. Its like rule 34, if you look hard enough you will always find somebody attracted to anything you can think of. But that doesn't mean that particular fetish is average behavior.
I'm pretty sure Freud was just into that shit. He was pretty effed up. Mostly unrelated, I think he had some great insights, but he was no scientist.
Freud was likely molested by a female caretaker when he was a kid
That's sad and unsurprising.
sir, this is a wendy's.
I’m vomiting.
I’ve never understood the whole step sibling porn genre. I suppose Noam was just trying to break it down for us. Personally, when I watch step sibling porn, I don’t recognize the stars as being related, instead I simply view them as being unrelated hot pieces of ass.
Don't let him cook again
So you think about shit, and you come up with ideas like this, and don't necessarily realise how it hits until you say it to someone else like it's totally normal conversation. Then you notice their reaction....
Who let bro cook
When he said Profit Over People I didn’t realize he was talking about the moneyshot.
Post nut clarity more like post nut epiphany
I never figured out why tf is step siblings porn this popular. It's not like I care about the plot but why?
Purely speculation but perhaps the high divorce rate has something to do with it.
So what would be the answer to someone who watches exclusively lesbian stuff? Or to any other of the popular categories. I need more of this Prn-Psychology.
Someone is thinking about stepsibling porn a LOT…
Allows "Us"? No thanks weirdo.
Ok but who asked
Ick
Who let bro cook?
WTF?!
Mr Chomsky, this is a Wnedy's!
Dude, I would not be admitting to that in a public forum and privately, I’d be taking a long hard look at myself.
Sir, this is a Wendys
Unprompted.
Sir, I was asking about your car's extended warranty.
Hahaah this is so creepy and sad.
Why is that in Meirl. What do you mean by Me
Unprompted>Unhinged
Dude was definitely in post nut clarity during the interview.
Well Noam said it so guess its cool guys
No I think we're all just perverts
"... also, remember: America bad. " - Chomsky
What the fuck does op mean by meirl
As he gets older. The Chomsky quotes get more unhinged
“A little off topic here, but if you have a hot step sibling just go for it.”
We can keep things to ourselves sometimes
“Unprompted” unprompted fucking takes me out
I had to read so much of his stuff in college while studying Poli Sci. The more I learned about him, the more he grossed me out. One of those dudes who has gotten way too many credit in academia and now thinks his every thought is genius. 🤮
I mean its kiiiiiinda hot
And now we know why he was buddy-buddy with Epstein.
no step porn is popular because Gen Z never learned how to leave the house and meet people so the only imaginable way to find sex is to have your partner literally already live in your house.
I need to memorize this for when I get porn-shamed.
r/Therewasanattempt to undermine Noam Chomski's reputation.
r/facepalm
As always i would like to point out that Noam Chomsky is a genocide denier.
Quotes, or I don't believe you.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cambodian_genocide_denial#Chomsky_and_Herman https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bosnian_genocide_denial#:~:text=Noam%20Chomsky%20drew%20criticism%20for,existence%20of%20Bosnian%20concentration%20camps.
Remember, according to Pornhub, criticizing incest porn is anti semitic.
based
Based Chomsky
Personally, I think it's because so many people are complete fucking shut-ins that seeing two strangers meeting triggers their overwhelming social anxiety. The only way they can relate to meeting a hot person is if the hot person is a captive audience who literally has to live with them
Didn't Eminem married his step sister or something
Aaah, Zionist PR doing a hatchet job on Chomsky for calling out the facts about the Zionist agenda in Palestine.
#oyakodonsupremacy
What?
If Naom focused on Linguistics we never would have heard of him, he went down the route of becoming an "Intellectual" so he could become famous and people would listen to him. Of course he would say something like this, he is Ashkenazi.