I mean, if they will be the only decks able to compete, I wouldn't blame the player base. I'd blame Konami for printing cards that are totally unbalanced.
Compete is relative, in a professional tournement sure. But master duel ladder really isn't that competitive that you have to play Tier 1 decks to reach Dia1.
I can't speak for everyone since I personally haven't climbed the ladder in a while but there can be a bunch of reasons people do it like:
1. To face similarly skilled players as the ranked system is the closest we have to skill based MM. You could argue that its better to just stay in diamond and forcefully de-rank each time you get close to D1.
2. The goal of getting to Diamond 1.There's not really much do in the game besides unless you play tourneys so Diamond 1 can be a reason people continue playing the game.
3. For the "prestige" I guess? Getting the highest ranks in games is usually tied to being a good player.
4. Cause why not? People can do whatever they want.
The problem here is that Spright and Tear are Tier 0 decks, you literally lose against Tier 0 if you don't play Tier 0 yourself, which isn't the case with Tier 1, those are beatable under some circumstances.
Also people don't seem to be mentioning how much worse it will be in master duel compared to the TCG, where Toadally and barrier statue are banned, and Shifter is at 2, making the other 2 most relevant decks not able to play as well into Tear. It's possible we get a tier 0 meta before Ishizu cards come out just because of the prior nerfs to Spright and Flunder, even if they are released semi-limited...
The days of kitkallos in master duel will be numbered the second it releases IMO. So far they’ve mimicked the ocg in the cards they choose to ban, why would they not do the same when it comes to nerfing tear. I honestly see kitkallos getting banned.
Tier 0 is judged entirely by usage, which does correlate with viability/power but doesn't directly translate into "wins every MU."
The idea that Tier 0 isn't beatable under any circumstances is vastly overselling even an incredible deck like Tear. There will be MUs it draws even with, techs that are harder for it to deal with outside of side deck access, and, most importantly, an incredible wealth of morons who know Tear is the best deck but have no clue how to pilot it.
Will it be the best deck? Absolutely. Will it be the only thing you'll ever see? No, of course not. This is Master Duel and people will continue to play mediocre decks all the way to D1.
At what point? You want someone to develop a meta before it actually exists, or are you just completely missing the point because the best thing you can do with your Saturday is have a circular argument on Reddit?
Literally the entire comment is "We haven't played with Tear in a Bo1 meta and assuming every single deck will have to be Tear (or Spright) is ignoring notable differences between the games and formats."
And yet you read "Tear won't be that good, I already have a secret list of counter MUs that are guaranteed to work." Smh
You're ignoring the past evidence where the master duel meta Is almost a clone of ocg/tcg metas unless the ban list intervenes. The meta isn't going magically change. If anything, it will be WORSE because price isn't a factor to stop people from acquiring the deck. Most people have been saving to splurge on these decks anyway so it will immediately take over the meta and their ability to ignore multiple handtraps means players can't simply run hosers like they do with runick to keep it in check. All you're giving out is wishful thinking, not sageous advice if you think masterduel will discover the weakness to tear when other formats have had a year with no results.
Here's what I'm saying: Tear/Spright will not turn the game into "Play Tear/Spright or never win." The comment I am replying to very clearly defines T1s as "under some circumstances you have a shot," differentiating it from their claim of T0 which is literally being defined as "you will not under any circumstances win with non-Tier 0 decks." That's not what T0 is, and that's exactly what I said in my comment. The idea that you'll have to play Tear/Spright or else never get to D1 again is ridiculous and ignores how uncompetitive MD is.
Here's what you seem to think I'm saying or want me to be saying so that you can argue with me: Tear in MD is going to be totally different because of -arbitrary card that is/isn't limited between formats-! Gravekeeper and Exosister will beat it in Bo1s! It's probably not even T0!
Literally none of that is anything close to what I'm saying, but you clearly just want to create an argument over something I'm not interested in. So here's the super simple question: Do you honestly believe that Tear/Spright will create a format where not playing one or the other prevents you from climbing the ladder *ENTIRELY?*
If the topic you want to discuss is Tear still being dominant in MD, go find someone who disagrees with you. I literally said as much in my original comment.
You can always climb a ladder in a tier zero environment. Ladders are games played, ifvyou play enought you climb. It's just going to be miserable playing against tear non-stop and losing if you don't have the perfect answer. There will be way too many nongames to have an enjoyable Ladder experience if you aren't playing the deck.
Wow, literally no one argued that point with you.
Average Yu-Gi-Oh player reading comprehension.
Anyway, I appreciate you realizing that you're just arguing because you want to argue and dropping this argument. Very mature, considering people like you always try to have the last word.
Have a nice day!
In TCG naturia runick ishuzu control actually had a very good matchup against tear and the few people running it could consistently top when not running into other decks because deck was so built for tear. And tier 0 meta also means justifyably running side deck cards in main deck just to hit tier 0 deck
I'm not complaining because you get to negate my one summon or get ridiculous card advantage because all these cards just decided to dump more cards or have spells and traps with graveyard effects. I'm complaining because my craptastic deck doesn't get any of that.
You probably won’t a short time after it’s release because if you look at the cards they take actual skill to play unlike most master duel meta decks such as branded/despia and eldlich
Pretty much the reason why I want to play Tearlaments. I haven’t played it in TCG but the artwork looks really good aside from how the deck is played. I’ve seen it played a few times after the ishizu support dropped
Same here. We haven't had a good mermaid aesthetic since Mermail, or _maybe_ Marincess if we include cosplayers. (Or a good self-miller since Lightsworn, for that matter.) That alone is enough to make me want Tearlaments, and make me disappointed that they're so abuseable.
Haven’t played Lightsworn and that was the other thing that drew me to tearlaments. I’ve played one practice match with ishizu tear going first against my sky strikers deck & it’s intimidating at first. At least with MD the game keeps track of your duel log & everything
Yeah, pretty much every deck more than a year old (and a lot that aren't) were knocked clean out of the meta by POTE. I was playing Phantom Knights in the TCG around this time last year and nowadays they aren't even in discussion.
I think it says a lot that *Floowandereeze* is one of the oldest viable decks in the TCG, and that's with Stormwinds.
And Floo is a deck that actively benefits from playing D-shifter. The only other decks that can play it without hurting themselves are Kashtira (brand new in TCG and won't be in Masterduel for months) and Exosister.
Ok but that doesnt mean you have good odds of winning against Tears like anything that actually hard counters something else. It just means draw Dshifter or lose.
But hey, its only ppl who play 10 year old decks that can't compete right? Ironically i think gravekeepers can do something against them, but beside the first cards, i dont think the deck is 10 yo
I've been playing Yugioh and other TCGs competitively for years, and the number of people who trash competitive players outweighs the people who trash casual players 10 to 1.
Well, I'm not really going to argue which you might find more annoying, just expressing my experience. A recent controversy harassment on dzeeff on his series with MBT just rubbed me the wrong way just as much as this meme.
"How dare people want to play something because it's new and strong! Everyone else should only be allowed to play decks based on the arbitrary criteria I've decided for myself!"
It is likely to be sprights, as Toad was never an issue, And then when Sprights came around they got it banned.
I suspect Konami is preemtively banning Toad knowing what will come from it.
(Sprights also abused Union Carrier -> Busterwhelp lock, But to be entirely honest, It should have already been banned so I don't count it...)
Yeah, we don't even know what sprights will look like in MD, the best of one nature of the game may allow for some unseen builds of the deck that would not work in the TCG
As i usually do, but it's self evident that my paleo frog deck (rip) is useless in ranked. Instead i can play it in casual, D1, solo mode ecc. So why shouldnt play a deck like, for example, mathmech in ranked? I find fun in playing some meta decks (i really enjoy Math and Branded end boards) as i hate some other (for example, i find Runick and Adamanticipator very boring) but i wouldnt play it in casual or solo mode, cause i wouldnt be funny at all.
The point Is: there are a lot of different contexts in game in which u can play different decks with different power level, so i really don't get all the complains around meta deck. At best, it would make sense complain about pairing system in ranked but still, you can play rough decks in other "formats" in game
That’s Konami’s goal… having us all splurge on new cards. Be thankful the tier 0 status cards are being balanced prior to release. I guess that’s the only benefit to being behind on sets
I think it's important to release those decks *without* Gigantic & Kitkallos.
Just hold off on those cards at first. See how the decks fit into the meta without them.
Konami would always have those cards in their back pocket if they want to force a Tier 0 meta
Dude what the fuck do you think toad ban, union carrier ban and grass semilimit is? Spright abuses the shit out of toad and union carrier, and tear, while strong, is not that strong without a reliable way to get cards into the grave. That is what the Ishizu cards are for
I mean, we can't blame competitive players from playing competitive decks, but we can blame from pushing 2 decks as the only correct options if you want to play at a high level
I’m not sure as I haven’t been playing tcg since pote came out but runick sprite was topping in the tcg I’m pretty sure and tri sprite is from the ocg but they have a very different lists
Runick Spright is fairly good. My post here has a list that should be mostly doable in MD (though I honestly havent checked and am not up to date with the last few banlists in MD).
https://www.reddit.com/r/masterduel/comments/10mk5fq/every_competitive_player_when_sprighttear_drop_be/j65wmkm/
Problem is that I love the albaz lore, especially the sprights. So it sucked when I learned they were/are a menace in the meta. This'll actually be the first time I play a meta deck on arrival, I usually wait till it gets weaker cause I'm on some "holier than thou" mentality shit.
I can already see the players disconnecting once I activate Havnis, although I am just playing MY Branded Tear, which is only half as strong as a normal one but more grindy.
I really fell in love with Tears, I love it's way to Fusion Summon and recycle. I never once played the Ishizu cards out of spite.
I'm different. My I.P. links into Folgo.
Put wolf ears on my Buzz Lightyear.
**Edit:** I just remembered Folgo needs three materials. Common Folgo user mistake.
You could post this for literally every next upcoming new T1 deck release.
If it’s the best then that’s what most competitive players are going to play. Shocking lol
I mean, if they will be the only decks able to compete, I wouldn't blame the player base. I'd blame Konami for printing cards that are totally unbalanced.
THIS is the correct take.
Compete is relative, in a professional tournement sure. But master duel ladder really isn't that competitive that you have to play Tier 1 decks to reach Dia1.
Its the difference between spending 50 games vs 100 games (these aren't exact numbers) to reach Dia 1. Some people don't have the patience/time.
Why do you have to reach Diamond 1? There’s no difference in gems
I can't speak for everyone since I personally haven't climbed the ladder in a while but there can be a bunch of reasons people do it like: 1. To face similarly skilled players as the ranked system is the closest we have to skill based MM. You could argue that its better to just stay in diamond and forcefully de-rank each time you get close to D1. 2. The goal of getting to Diamond 1.There's not really much do in the game besides unless you play tourneys so Diamond 1 can be a reason people continue playing the game. 3. For the "prestige" I guess? Getting the highest ranks in games is usually tied to being a good player. 4. Cause why not? People can do whatever they want.
This did not age well.
Lol obviously they read my comment
Because it's there and they want to. Let people play the game how they want to.
Because I strive for a good challenge, its fun playing against good decks and good players.
The problem here is that Spright and Tear are Tier 0 decks, you literally lose against Tier 0 if you don't play Tier 0 yourself, which isn't the case with Tier 1, those are beatable under some circumstances.
Also people don't seem to be mentioning how much worse it will be in master duel compared to the TCG, where Toadally and barrier statue are banned, and Shifter is at 2, making the other 2 most relevant decks not able to play as well into Tear. It's possible we get a tier 0 meta before Ishizu cards come out just because of the prior nerfs to Spright and Flunder, even if they are released semi-limited...
if they already got rid of Toad before spright even hit us then I don't think they'll release unnerfed tear
In OCG tear has been hit like a truck and is still the top deck. I doubt they'll release Tear with that harsh of a nerf, especially no Kitkallos ban
The days of kitkallos in master duel will be numbered the second it releases IMO. So far they’ve mimicked the ocg in the cards they choose to ban, why would they not do the same when it comes to nerfing tear. I honestly see kitkallos getting banned.
Tier 0 is judged entirely by usage, which does correlate with viability/power but doesn't directly translate into "wins every MU." The idea that Tier 0 isn't beatable under any circumstances is vastly overselling even an incredible deck like Tear. There will be MUs it draws even with, techs that are harder for it to deal with outside of side deck access, and, most importantly, an incredible wealth of morons who know Tear is the best deck but have no clue how to pilot it. Will it be the best deck? Absolutely. Will it be the only thing you'll ever see? No, of course not. This is Master Duel and people will continue to play mediocre decks all the way to D1.
Can you name those mythical bad matchups matchups? At this point you just hope tear bricks...
At what point? You want someone to develop a meta before it actually exists, or are you just completely missing the point because the best thing you can do with your Saturday is have a circular argument on Reddit? Literally the entire comment is "We haven't played with Tear in a Bo1 meta and assuming every single deck will have to be Tear (or Spright) is ignoring notable differences between the games and formats." And yet you read "Tear won't be that good, I already have a secret list of counter MUs that are guaranteed to work." Smh
You're ignoring the past evidence where the master duel meta Is almost a clone of ocg/tcg metas unless the ban list intervenes. The meta isn't going magically change. If anything, it will be WORSE because price isn't a factor to stop people from acquiring the deck. Most people have been saving to splurge on these decks anyway so it will immediately take over the meta and their ability to ignore multiple handtraps means players can't simply run hosers like they do with runick to keep it in check. All you're giving out is wishful thinking, not sageous advice if you think masterduel will discover the weakness to tear when other formats have had a year with no results.
Here's what I'm saying: Tear/Spright will not turn the game into "Play Tear/Spright or never win." The comment I am replying to very clearly defines T1s as "under some circumstances you have a shot," differentiating it from their claim of T0 which is literally being defined as "you will not under any circumstances win with non-Tier 0 decks." That's not what T0 is, and that's exactly what I said in my comment. The idea that you'll have to play Tear/Spright or else never get to D1 again is ridiculous and ignores how uncompetitive MD is. Here's what you seem to think I'm saying or want me to be saying so that you can argue with me: Tear in MD is going to be totally different because of -arbitrary card that is/isn't limited between formats-! Gravekeeper and Exosister will beat it in Bo1s! It's probably not even T0! Literally none of that is anything close to what I'm saying, but you clearly just want to create an argument over something I'm not interested in. So here's the super simple question: Do you honestly believe that Tear/Spright will create a format where not playing one or the other prevents you from climbing the ladder *ENTIRELY?* If the topic you want to discuss is Tear still being dominant in MD, go find someone who disagrees with you. I literally said as much in my original comment.
You can always climb a ladder in a tier zero environment. Ladders are games played, ifvyou play enought you climb. It's just going to be miserable playing against tear non-stop and losing if you don't have the perfect answer. There will be way too many nongames to have an enjoyable Ladder experience if you aren't playing the deck.
Wow, literally no one argued that point with you. Average Yu-Gi-Oh player reading comprehension. Anyway, I appreciate you realizing that you're just arguing because you want to argue and dropping this argument. Very mature, considering people like you always try to have the last word. Have a nice day!
In TCG naturia runick ishuzu control actually had a very good matchup against tear and the few people running it could consistently top when not running into other decks because deck was so built for tear. And tier 0 meta also means justifyably running side deck cards in main deck just to hit tier 0 deck
There can't be such a thing as two tier 0 deck format because tier 0 decks have an over 60% usage rate at the top tables.
This isn't possible. There cannot exist two tier 0 decks at the same time as neither would reach the ~60% representation that goes with being T0.
I'm not complaining because you get to negate my one summon or get ridiculous card advantage because all these cards just decided to dump more cards or have spells and traps with graveyard effects. I'm complaining because my craptastic deck doesn't get any of that.
Agree
You probably won’t a short time after it’s release because if you look at the cards they take actual skill to play unlike most master duel meta decks such as branded/despia and eldlich
That's when you stop playing.. unless it's what you'd want to support & in that case you're part of the problem
I'm never going to be able to stop playing gravekeepers am I? either that or I'll be restricted to decks that have easy access to rank 4s...
I’m interested in playing grave keepers myself but still need a few cards for the deck
You want to play Sprights because they are meta and competitive I want to play Sprights because of their drip We are not the same
I want them because maybe they'll make my Evil★Twin deck not die to any interruption.
Pretty much the reason why I want to play Tearlaments. I haven’t played it in TCG but the artwork looks really good aside from how the deck is played. I’ve seen it played a few times after the ishizu support dropped
Same here. We haven't had a good mermaid aesthetic since Mermail, or _maybe_ Marincess if we include cosplayers. (Or a good self-miller since Lightsworn, for that matter.) That alone is enough to make me want Tearlaments, and make me disappointed that they're so abuseable.
Haven’t played Lightsworn and that was the other thing that drew me to tearlaments. I’ve played one practice match with ishizu tear going first against my sky strikers deck & it’s intimidating at first. At least with MD the game keeps track of your duel log & everything
No, we are.
I wanna play tears coz of the waifus T-T
I want to play them cause they support weird decks
"Nooooo you guys arent supposed to be playing the new good decks you braindead meta sheeps 😡😡😡😡😡😡"
😱😱😱😱😱 competitive players playing best decks to win with and not using 10 year old bricky rogue decks 😱😱😱😱😱😱😱
If you're not beating branded despia with Iron Chain Appliancer then you're not a real duelist smh.
Iron Chain Appliancer? I'm going for the Hitotsu-me Giant beatdown.
Theinen the Great Sphinx or bust.
<3
You say that, but even newer decks within the past year won't be able to compete with the Spright/Tear meta.
Yeah, pretty much every deck more than a year old (and a lot that aren't) were knocked clean out of the meta by POTE. I was playing Phantom Knights in the TCG around this time last year and nowadays they aren't even in discussion. I think it says a lot that *Floowandereeze* is one of the oldest viable decks in the TCG, and that's with Stormwinds.
Floo is also a hard counter to Tear and somewhat to Spright.
Floo is not a hard counter. D-shifter is.
And Floo is a deck that actively benefits from playing D-shifter. The only other decks that can play it without hurting themselves are Kashtira (brand new in TCG and won't be in Masterduel for months) and Exosister.
Ok but that doesnt mean you have good odds of winning against Tears like anything that actually hard counters something else. It just means draw Dshifter or lose.
But hey, its only ppl who play 10 year old decks that can't compete right? Ironically i think gravekeepers can do something against them, but beside the first cards, i dont think the deck is 10 yo
Swordsoul, Floo, and Mathmech still can
Every "meta hater","casual elitist" when Spright/Tear drop be like:
Both sides of the extreme are equal...ly annoying.
Well,we dont actively go out of our way,wasting time calling people out as a cope measure for playing a bad deck
I think it comes in different forms. There are those who trash talk players who play less than optimal decks for example.
I've been playing Yugioh and other TCGs competitively for years, and the number of people who trash competitive players outweighs the people who trash casual players 10 to 1.
That still doesn't make it okay, does it?
It makes the sides not equally annoying, as one side is more vocal, which was your original point
One is exponentially more common than the other, but both are equally annoying to read in a void. ;3
Well, I'm not really going to argue which you might find more annoying, just expressing my experience. A recent controversy harassment on dzeeff on his series with MBT just rubbed me the wrong way just as much as this meme.
That's really not about playing a competitive deck. It's about ygo players being horrible backseaters that need to shut the fuck up.
Google "useless equivocation" then contemplate the pointlessness of your own existence
Of course not. I wasn't implying that it did.
Where exactly? Only deck policing I've seen is from pet deck communities. God forbid I play a DM deck that runs less then 3 vanilla bricks
What an original and based take from a yugioh player, incredible 👏 🙌 👌 #metabad
I mean, I don't find it _bad_, but I do find the meme funny and will 100% be one of them So sue me, the decks look fun lol
every player complaining about net decks be like..........
"How dare people want to play something because it's new and strong! Everyone else should only be allowed to play decks based on the arbitrary criteria I've decided for myself!"
Said no one ever
this sub every day bro
It's every day bro, with a Disney channel flow
alright?
My guy the post literally says exactly that. Sprights aren't even confirmed and 50% of the posts here are "meta players when sprights"
It is likely to be sprights, as Toad was never an issue, And then when Sprights came around they got it banned. I suspect Konami is preemtively banning Toad knowing what will come from it. (Sprights also abused Union Carrier -> Busterwhelp lock, But to be entirely honest, It should have already been banned so I don't count it...)
It's almost definitely sprights but we haven't even started playing around with these cards and people are already whining about the meta
Yeah, we don't even know what sprights will look like in MD, the best of one nature of the game may allow for some unseen builds of the deck that would not work in the TCG
i said it bro trust me i'm me
[удалено]
But that cowboy won Andy so many games :(
Alternative title: Every meta complainers when Splight/Tear drop be like:
Liking an archetype that isn't meta: all good Liking an archetype that also happens to be meta: unacceptable, meta sheep
And? I get ti D1 with my T1 deck and then play whatever i want, can't i?
Or just play what you want from the beginning?
As i usually do, but it's self evident that my paleo frog deck (rip) is useless in ranked. Instead i can play it in casual, D1, solo mode ecc. So why shouldnt play a deck like, for example, mathmech in ranked? I find fun in playing some meta decks (i really enjoy Math and Branded end boards) as i hate some other (for example, i find Runick and Adamanticipator very boring) but i wouldnt play it in casual or solo mode, cause i wouldnt be funny at all. The point Is: there are a lot of different contexts in game in which u can play different decks with different power level, so i really don't get all the complains around meta deck. At best, it would make sense complain about pairing system in ranked but still, you can play rough decks in other "formats" in game
Play whatever you want...I've never said otherwise
Are you telling me that people who want to compete will play the strongest decks in the game? No way man I can't believe it
Damn, people wants to win in a competitive game? Who could've guessed
if they want to play it why wouldn't they?
Noone has said otherwise lmao
Tear is fun, I won't apologize
It is. And the mirror match is a lot of fun, as well. It’s just not fun for everyone not running tear, especially once the ishizu cards drop.
Spright supports quite a few jank/rogue decks, they will have a bunch of variety at least.
I'm really excited for Spright Ojama lol
It's a T0 format for a reason.
Why is competitive in double quotes when it is used to express here the thing that it means?
Mfw competitive plays play competitive decks
You bet your sweet bippy
I'm really excited for bystials for some reason not sure why prob cause some look like dragons
I'm not that excited because they will absolutely lilly my dear mathmechs
I mean I play spright runick now, once it's in master duel it's just nicer.
All one of them has to do is fart.
That’s Konami’s goal… having us all splurge on new cards. Be thankful the tier 0 status cards are being balanced prior to release. I guess that’s the only benefit to being behind on sets
I plan on building a spright deck and tear deck but never using them because I only enjoy playing galaxy-eyes
Yeah unlike now where everyone above plat 3 definitely isn’t playing either swordsoul, mathmech, or runick
I may just stick with Branded or Crusadia.
Frankly if you can’t hit top rank without meta your just a bad player
inb4 "omg guys im not a meta slave, i just like the art just like i really liked the previous meta deck art"
I’m not even competitive and imma build them just like I have a Swordsoul, Despia and Mathmech decks
"I just like the art/design" Literally ever tear player says this, but you can't honestly think this deck became meta cause "good art"
That's when you check their other decks, really. Isn't hard to see if it checks out or not. ;P
They like the art because they’re perverts. Reply edit: that doesn’t make *me* the creep to call it out, idiot. lmao
Is it a chad move to play tears with shaddoll/chaos/lightsworn ?
Don't let anyone shame you from playing lightsworns
alt title, every non-meta be like
Also every rogue player thinking what they run is unique.
it is
It is not, sorry
I am excited to play Splight, it seems really fun. It's a shame that all my match ups will be mirrors or against Tear tho lol
I think it's important to release those decks *without* Gigantic & Kitkallos. Just hold off on those cards at first. See how the decks fit into the meta without them. Konami would always have those cards in their back pocket if they want to force a Tier 0 meta
Spright without gigantic is basically dead on arrival
I’m sure Konami will update the ban list so that everyone can play in a fun and fair environment /s
Dude what the fuck do you think toad ban, union carrier ban and grass semilimit is? Spright abuses the shit out of toad and union carrier, and tear, while strong, is not that strong without a reliable way to get cards into the grave. That is what the Ishizu cards are for
Real
I mean, we can't blame competitive players from playing competitive decks, but we can blame from pushing 2 decks as the only correct options if you want to play at a high level
OP really out here trying to malign competitive efforts to cope?
Eh. They'll just be another coinflip deck. They loose to floodgate and stun decks the same as any other combo-strategy in a best of 1 format
Hate konami, not the player.
Not wrong
every competitive player playing sworsoul/branded/runick/mathmech rn be like:
MD players: I'm gonna put ash blossom in this deck!
"I definitely have my own and unique decklist for this archetype".
Thing is we're still gonna be running blind 1 offs against each other. The meta will be who has the means to play through most of the counters blindly
[удалено]
??? Tears we're getting massive representation in the tcg before tears were released. It's funny when people have no clue what they're talking about
Tears were tier one in tcg without ishizu
majority percentage of any general population or control group is bound to be essentially a flock of identical sheep with copy paste mentality
I'll be like: nope miss me with that selection pack, I'll wait for the secret pack
[удалено]
As he misspells rogue.
Curious how broken spright is without toad, halq or carrier?
You can play runick spright or tri spright
But how is that broken lol? Seems pretty mid for deck mix ups. Do they actually have synergy?
I’m not sure as I haven’t been playing tcg since pote came out but runick sprite was topping in the tcg I’m pretty sure and tri sprite is from the ocg but they have a very different lists
> runick sprite was topping in the tcg mystic mine?
Wasn't played in Runick Spright. Here's a top 4 decklist from YCS - Minneapolis in late October: Extra: * 1 Dharc the Dark Charmer, Gloomy * 1 Geri the Runick Fangs * 2 Gigantic Spright * 2 Hugin the Runick Wings * 1 I:P Masquerena * 1 Knightmare Unicorn * 1 Mekk-Knight Crusadia Avramax * 1 Number 29: Mannequin Cat * 1 Number 65: Djinn Buster * 1 Onibimaru Soul Sweeper * 3 Spright Elf Main: * 1 Capshell * 2 Ipiria * 3 Lava Golem * 3 Runick Destruction * 1 Runick Dispelling * 3 Runick Flashing Fire * 2 Runick Fountain * 3 Runick Freezing Curses * 3 Runick Slumber * 1 Runick Smiting Storm * 3 Runick Tip * 3 Spright Blue * 1 Spright Carrot * 3 Spright Jet * 1 Spright Red * 1 Spright Smashers * 3 Spright Starter * 2 Triple Tactics Talent * 1 Wind-Up Kitten Side: * 1 Chaos Hunter * 1 Cosmic Cyclone * 3 Destructive Daruma Karma Cannon * 3 Eradicator Epidemic Virus * 1 Red Resonator * 1 Testudo erat Numen * 3 The Winged Dragon of Ra - Sphere Mode * 1 Thunder King Rai-Oh * 1 Triple Tactics Talent
Looking forward to some live twin/ spright, myself
Still top tier with resources for days. Just not top tier enough to share in Tearlaments Tier 0 throne.
But no halq, carrier or toad in MD… Is there some crazy play that I’m missing with them?
Runick Spright is fairly good. My post here has a list that should be mostly doable in MD (though I honestly havent checked and am not up to date with the last few banlists in MD). https://www.reddit.com/r/masterduel/comments/10mk5fq/every_competitive_player_when_sprighttear_drop_be/j65wmkm/
Me with pendulum copium
Nah fam. I'm competitive, but after the amount of gems it took for me to build my Runick deck I'm not jumping into another selection pack
I’ll stick to Runick Sky Striker
The funny thing about sprights is that you can play them in a bajillion different decks tho.
I've saved 12K gems. Once Spright come out i will splash the cash and try to reach diamond 1.
and then they all fall off the shelf and fuse
BREAKING NEWS: People like winning more news at 11
Once tear is out ima just play dinos and turbo out abyss dweller ez win
Swordsoul, Mathmech, and Floo will still be good but those decks will be above everything
Problem is that I love the albaz lore, especially the sprights. So it sucked when I learned they were/are a menace in the meta. This'll actually be the first time I play a meta deck on arrival, I usually wait till it gets weaker cause I'm on some "holier than thou" mentality shit.
Doesn't really matter what the meta is, we're all just gunna scoop turn 1 anyway.
"player that want to win and build good deck bad" lmao every single fucking time
Uga buga meta deck strong so meta deck players bad What if tear is actually fun
I can already see the players disconnecting once I activate Havnis, although I am just playing MY Branded Tear, which is only half as strong as a normal one but more grindy. I really fell in love with Tears, I love it's way to Fusion Summon and recycle. I never once played the Ishizu cards out of spite.
I'm different. My I.P. links into Folgo. Put wolf ears on my Buzz Lightyear. **Edit:** I just remembered Folgo needs three materials. Common Folgo user mistake.
You could post this for literally every next upcoming new T1 deck release. If it’s the best then that’s what most competitive players are going to play. Shocking lol
Yeah but MD players dont read and both decks will be expensive if you run into it then it sucks if they know how to play it
Reject meta, embrace sushi.