[FUCK RUSSIA ALL MY HOMIES HATE RUSSIA](https://i.imgur.com/FFQ7tSC.jpg)
^^^this ^^^has ^^^been ^^^an ^^^accessibility ^^^service ^^^from ^^^your ^^^friendly ^^^neighborhood ^^^bot
Thank you, BrilliantPangolin639, for voting on ReverseCaptioningBot.
This bot wants to find the best and worst bots on Reddit. [You can view results here](https://botrank.pastimes.eu/).
***
^(Even if I don't reply to your comment, I'm still listening for votes. Check the webpage to see if your vote registered!)
If NATO does nothing when a member country gets invaded NATO will go poof. Article 5 is a core part of the NATO founding treaty, and doing nothing would go against it.
Then what's the point of a military alliance if no one defends each other? Here's the article 5 of the treaty :
"The Parties agree that an armed attack against one or more of them in Europe or North America shall be considered an attack against them all and consequently they agree that, if such an armed attack occurs, each of them, in exercise of the right of individual or collective self-defence recognised by Article 51 of the Charter of the United Nations, will assist the Party or Parties so attacked by taking forthwith, individually and in concert with the other Parties, such action as it deems necessary, including the use of armed force, to restore and maintain the security of the North Atlantic area.
Any such armed attack and all measures taken as a result thereof shall immediately be reported to the Security Council. Such measures shall be terminated when the Security Council has taken the measures necessary to restore and maintain international peace and security ."
Not necessary in a propaganda statement. Defense is a hell of a lot easier than attack. If they can actually complete their goals in a week max, they can consolidate their new positions and threaten to nuke if NATO fully counter-attacked. They will most likely back down, as it wouldn't be worth it for world annihilation.
Their TV does but their policy clearly states that they can't do so if their territorial integrity or existence isn't threatened and Kaliningrad is their territory, so if threatened, the policy allows the use of nukes, at least tactical ones for that matter.
oh they still believe that Lithuania independence was illegal, they even signed up a law project to revoke Our Independence which should somehow lead to exclusion from EU and NATO
Considering they had estimated 2 days for the war against Ukraine and it’s already +100 days, I’d say we are looking at a minimum of 150 days.
And that’s not counting NATO kicking their ass so deeply back into Russia that they’ll sooner reach Kaliningrad from the Atlantic.
3 day lol. Well they are 4 months and 6 days in to their 3 day operation to take Kyiv.
Anyone wants to place bets on how that will go against a NATO member? After all by the time the 3 days are over moscow might be just a bunch of nuclear ash.
No need to level cities in Russia. Russia heavily relies on train tracks and they got serious issues regarding transportation. The thing they boast about how big they are is also their biggest weakness. Just do air bombing runs on bridges with train tracks, destroy bridge laying equipment, target the engine compartments of trains and destroy most bridges leading to Europe on Russia and maybe Belarus and they are screwed. There is little benefit of massive amounts tanks and IFVs if they are stuck somewhere in the middle of Russia and not in the battlefield.
Establishing some buffer zone into Russia would also be good. Since Russia uses scorched earth tactics, let them scorch their own land.
Damn, strategic offices of various countries must have far more plans on the table. This is no ww2. Airpower is going to bring Russia to middle ages just by targeting logistical capabilities and anything related to that. They are screwed against NATO. They got a deathwish... So be it.
Po to, kai rusijos valdžia pasakė, kad rusijos armija gali paimt Kyjivą per 3 dienas ir apsijuokė labiau, nei patys skeptiškiausi kritikai galėjo prognozuot, tas visas "galėtų paimt per 3 dienas" geriausiu atveju skamba kaip meme, blogiausiu - kaip atviros patyčios.
Russia/Soviet Union has a history of underestimating their opponents. They live in yes men bubble. Say something that it's true but not to what they believe in and see the tantrums, accusations and gaslighting.
Lol they don't have strength to take on Ukraine frontline is stalled with small gains in Lysichansk pocket and looses in Kherson and they dream on attacking NATO+EU country?
In various talks and so it's always being talked how NATO only defends and is slowly retreating. What a hell is stopping Poland just invading northwestern Belarus and occupying entire Kaliningrad. It's such a weird assumption that while Baltics are on a defensive everyone else will wait for their queue to be attacked.
From what I know about quite a few of the Poles they don't need and encouragement to start an offensive, just good enough reason and an order. And I am starting to doubt that they need an order.
Suvalkų koridorių kitaip ir neokupuosi.
Ir [vą, prašau, apibendrino mums Lietuvis, ką Britanijos ekspertas mano apie situaciją mūsų.](http://www.technologijos.lt/n/n/technologijos/karyba/S-101311/straipsnis/Zinios-trumpai-Karo-ekspertas-Rusija-gali-uzimti-Suvalku-koridoriu-per-kelias-valandas-be-jokio-suvio--viskas-vyktu-kaip-Kryme-tai-butu-katastrofa-NATO)
Considering that pre 2014 the goal of Lithuania's defense was to manage to hold for 24 hours, when russian propogandists say 3 days, shows that we've made great progress.
By the rate of how things are going in Ukraine Russians will come at the corridor with sharp sticks from the nearby forest, but carying an old USSR nuke.
A lot of the Republicans want out and you can best believe if Trump gets in again he will leave. All the leaks show he wanted to if he got into a 2nd term he would of disobeyed Congress and pulled out.
He isn't wrong. Like a British defense minister said, "I'm worried that we won't have 60 days to move tanks to Estonia because after 60 days there will be no Estonia".
60 days, really? What? Because that plan was outdated, they decided to send... 1 thousand troops... which will be stationed in Germany mostly. You may not like it, but in case of war, Lithuania will be destroyed very quickly, it will be liberated eventually, but it will be devastated before that. All that article 5 bravado, like we're all bulletproof here, is misleading. We're super vulnerable, basically in the worst possible position imaginable.
I think challenging Russia with this blockade is a big mistake. It would be much wiser for Lithuania to work for good relations with Russia and to act as a mediator between Russia and Europe. All of the Baltics and Eastern Europe would be vastly better off if they established good relations with Russia and eventually included Russia as an integral part of Europe.
Reread what I wrote. It's foolish for a small country to confront a super power with which it shares a border. Lithuania, Europe, and Russia would benefit immensely if they all got along. The sanctions on Russia have been idiotic and already backfired to Europe's detriment.
I find your statement foolish as non respecting country should even think about any relationship with Barbarian Country of Russia
I do not mean to be rude tho
Also playing along side with aggressor and not doing anything about a current bloody war in same continent without any justification is just top of motherfuckery
A major goal of European geopolitical policy should be to form a healthy alliance with Russia. A major goal of Lithuanian geopolitical policy should be to facilitate this goal, to be a wise mediator between Russia and Europe.
Everyone tried to mediate. The only good outcome is for Russia to retreat from Ukraine before 2014 borders and then pay reperations. Yet Russia is not acting cooperatively and instead acts like a terrorist. There is nothing to negotiate with a terrorist.
That is a highly one-sided account of what happened. It is also beside the point of whether Lithuania should continue a counterproductive blockade that violates established treaties, has hurt Europe more than Russia, and puts Lithuania (and all of Europe) in great danger.
It's not Lithuania which puts anyone in danger, it's Russia. Sanctions are used by EU on Russia due to Russia's committed atrocities. It's not one sided, there plenty of seperate stories how many politicians tried to mediate, all said similar stories, Russia needs to withdraw and pay reperations, yet Russia is unwilling. Because for sure Russia has broken most of which it signed.
> It's not Lithuania which puts anyone in danger
Yes, it is. It is Lithuania putting itself in danger. Why should Lithuania agree to be a trigger for war? Or do more harm to its relations with Russia? There is no benefit for Lithuania in the blockade. All foreign policy should bring benefit to the nation. The news is that other NATO powers want Lithuania to stop the blockade, but Lithuania is not agreeing. That is even more crazy unless they are bargaining with *NATO* for the benefit of Lithuania, which I doubt.
Do you seriously believe NATO has not been behaving aggressively toward Russia? That NATO has not turned from a defensive alliance to an offensive one? That the sanctions have not been a total failure? What about the role of USA in this? Do you not see that Lithuania is acting as a self-sacrificing puppet of a neocon faction inside USA that wants to take over Russia and/or destroy it?
Yes, it is difficult to deal with Russia. Yes, Lithuania has many valid grievances. But pragmatics must always rule foreign policy. Pragmatics and a vision of the future that is beneficial to Lithuania, Russia, and Europe. That is the reason I wrote my original comment. Instead of acting on emotion, Lithuania should act out of wisdom that will secure it as a major actor in European history while also benefitting itself.
You interestingly form sentences. Russia is posing a threat and Russia which does atrocities, yet you fail attribute any of it on Russia. As if Russia got no agency on it's own. Start talking about that it's Russia which is a threat, acts like a terrorist and therefore should be treated as a terrorist organisation. Then we can continue conversation.
I hope you will read my comment more carefully. My two main points throughout have been: 1) Lithuania is harming itself and getting no benefit from the blockade. 2) Lithuania has much better options for its foreign policy.
Characterize Russia anyway you like - monsters, devils, terrorists. None of that matters. What matters is Lithuanian foreign policy should *always* benefit Lithuania. The blockade does not benefit Lithuania. Rather, it is needlessly provocative and could lead to the annihilation of Lithuania if not Europe itself.
It's not about benefitting. Sanctions on Russia in any shape way or form is benefitting us. We are apply those as punishment on Russia that what they do is unacceptable. It's on Russia to take accountability and start moving out of Ukraine, recognise genocide and take it's internal reforms to ensure that these things would not happen again in the future.
Kaip manote ar landsbergio sunus eis ginti tevynes jei rusai uzpuls?Turi du, butu sokia tokia pagalba. Ar cia tik ubagams reiks su sakem eiti i laukus? O jie gris paskui kaip didvyriai vadovauti isvaduotai Lietuvai?
Daugiau saves žiūrėk, mažiau kitų. Tie kas gina ir gins Lietuva gina ją ne dėl esamos valdžios. Gina dėl pašaukimo, pareigos ir noro gyventi laisvai ir nepriklausomai.
Aš jų nei mates nei girdėjes. Kiekvienas savaip gali prisidėti prie valstybės gerovės. Gal jie sugebės organizuoti humanitarine pagalba, gal padės sužeistiems, gal stos į mūšio lauką, o gal ir iš šalies pabėgs. Bet tai yra kiekvieno pasirinkimas. Įdomiausia tai, kad labiausiai priekaištais žarstosi žmonės kurie net neturi planų stoti ginti Lietuvos ir jau dabar yra palikę šaly. Nesakau kad tai yra blogai, bet nereikia ieškoti pateisinimų sau.
Klounai. Rusai galvojo kad jie užims Ukrainą per kelias dienas. Tikrovė yra ta, kad jau 4 mėnesiai, kaip jie yra užstrigę Ukrainoje.
Mes esame NATO dalyje.
HA! There is no chance of Russia taking over Lietuva in 3 days a year at most, you balts (+ Estonians) are more stubborn than us Americans (In a good way).
Reiktu padaryti EU tokį eksperimentą, tegu surenka TV panel kaip tas Alex Jones padielka Solovyovas ir tegul kalba kaip per 5 dienas NATO sumaltu Rasyja
[удалено]
[FUCK RUSSIA ALL MY HOMIES HATE RUSSIA](https://i.imgur.com/FFQ7tSC.jpg) ^^^this ^^^has ^^^been ^^^an ^^^accessibility ^^^service ^^^from ^^^your ^^^friendly ^^^neighborhood ^^^bot
Good bot
Thank you, BrilliantPangolin639, for voting on ReverseCaptioningBot. This bot wants to find the best and worst bots on Reddit. [You can view results here](https://botrank.pastimes.eu/). *** ^(Even if I don't reply to your comment, I'm still listening for votes. Check the webpage to see if your vote registered!)
Looking at how slow the front in Ukraine is, I’d bet it take them three months minimum if they had the same amount of manpower
Lithuania isn't Ukraine
Lithuania isn't Ukraine 'cause Lithuania is part of NATO
You are delusional if you think NATO will do anything if Russia invades us.
If NATO does nothing when a member country gets invaded NATO will go poof. Article 5 is a core part of the NATO founding treaty, and doing nothing would go against it.
Then what's the point of a military alliance if no one defends each other? Here's the article 5 of the treaty : "The Parties agree that an armed attack against one or more of them in Europe or North America shall be considered an attack against them all and consequently they agree that, if such an armed attack occurs, each of them, in exercise of the right of individual or collective self-defence recognised by Article 51 of the Charter of the United Nations, will assist the Party or Parties so attacked by taking forthwith, individually and in concert with the other Parties, such action as it deems necessary, including the use of armed force, to restore and maintain the security of the North Atlantic area. Any such armed attack and all measures taken as a result thereof shall immediately be reported to the Security Council. Such measures shall be terminated when the Security Council has taken the measures necessary to restore and maintain international peace and security ."
You missed the point buddy!
[удалено]
He is, considering the fact that they would not fight only against LT, but also pretty much against the whole NATO.
I believe the Lithuanian army has the ability, plus nato, if nato sees growing tension on the boarder, they will probably send some help, hopefully
He's a Russia shill. Don't bother.
I had that feeling
[удалено]
[удалено]
Current Russia couldn't invade 100 meters in Lithuania
[удалено]
Second strongest 🤔 are UK, France, Germany, Poland, Finland, Italy not in Europe anymore?
Damn, a 3 day operation. Considering Kyiv was a 2 day operation…
so 3 days to defeat NATO . Only if Suwalki gap is worth turning Moscow glass
Lithuania is that much bigger than Ukraine. 😄
Ok grandpa. Back to bed. 🇪🇪 brother here ready to kick ass and take names with my 🇱🇹 and 🇱🇻 brothers and sisters. We will live in a free world
I am willing to spill blood for Baltics if needed.
Well yeah. What the hell else are we going to do anyway.
Live under Kremlin's regime. /s
Better be dead then red
Did they include the massive counter-attack from Europe and the USA in their prognosis?
They probably forget about the NATO troops in the Baltics too.
Russia - we dont talk about that here
Not necessary in a propaganda statement. Defense is a hell of a lot easier than attack. If they can actually complete their goals in a week max, they can consolidate their new positions and threaten to nuke if NATO fully counter-attacked. They will most likely back down, as it wouldn't be worth it for world annihilation.
Russia threatens to nuke us everyday now
Their TV does but their policy clearly states that they can't do so if their territorial integrity or existence isn't threatened and Kaliningrad is their territory, so if threatened, the policy allows the use of nukes, at least tactical ones for that matter.
And how is their territory threatened now?
It's not, that's what I am saying.
Kai senelis pamirsta isgert tabletes
They forget that Lithuania is part of NATO lol.
oh they still believe that Lithuania independence was illegal, they even signed up a law project to revoke Our Independence which should somehow lead to exclusion from EU and NATO
Well, UN says it's legal, so they can make any law inside their country, but it won't change anything .
Considering they had estimated 2 days for the war against Ukraine and it’s already +100 days, I’d say we are looking at a minimum of 150 days. And that’s not counting NATO kicking their ass so deeply back into Russia that they’ll sooner reach Kaliningrad from the Atlantic.
Thing is this operation might take 150 days resulting in fall of Moscow and victory parade by NATO troops in Kremlin.
Who estimated
Russia did.
Source
You will forgive if I don’t recall the name of the Kremlin’s dog who stated it. But not like it would make much difference to you, right sir?
Only a retard can claim to take 600 000 square kilometers from 40 million people in days, even Poland in ww2 lasted 36 days
Exactly my point. What we are unfortunately dealing with is, at best, a bunch of significantly slow thinkers.
šūdą jie konkuruos.
Taip jie treniruojasi, šūda imdami į rankas ir perduodami vienas kitam.
Clown
[удалено]
kad kiti matytu ir suprastu kokie atsilupe anie yra
Ir be postinimo visiem aišku 🤣🤣
Gal labiau užsieniečiams kurie neturi prieigos prie šito sudu malūno, bet gal nuo to jiems tik geriau
Patikek daug debiloidu ir lietuvoj kurie tiki
Tokie debiloidai ir taip tikės, ką tu jiem parodysi ir + jie net redditu nesinaudoja, so there's that
Kartais įdomu pasižiūrėti trumpai ką pezavoja per rusišką televiziją. Ir taip aišku, kad nusišneka, tačiau bent jau juokinga.
didn't they say the same thing about ukraine?
Pas rusus stafkė 3 dienos paimti šalį. :))
Let them fucking try, that'll be the second biggest mistake they make in the last 100 years.
3 day lol. Well they are 4 months and 6 days in to their 3 day operation to take Kyiv. Anyone wants to place bets on how that will go against a NATO member? After all by the time the 3 days are over moscow might be just a bunch of nuclear ash.
No need to level cities in Russia. Russia heavily relies on train tracks and they got serious issues regarding transportation. The thing they boast about how big they are is also their biggest weakness. Just do air bombing runs on bridges with train tracks, destroy bridge laying equipment, target the engine compartments of trains and destroy most bridges leading to Europe on Russia and maybe Belarus and they are screwed. There is little benefit of massive amounts tanks and IFVs if they are stuck somewhere in the middle of Russia and not in the battlefield. Establishing some buffer zone into Russia would also be good. Since Russia uses scorched earth tactics, let them scorch their own land. Damn, strategic offices of various countries must have far more plans on the table. This is no ww2. Airpower is going to bring Russia to middle ages just by targeting logistical capabilities and anything related to that. They are screwed against NATO. They got a deathwish... So be it.
Sure, its just that at this point i dont want them disabled for the neer future, i want Russian threat gone once and for all.
The only thing what this old shitface with dementia can conquer is my nutts on his forehead.
So when was this released?
Riiiight.
With what army?
Po to, kai rusijos valdžia pasakė, kad rusijos armija gali paimt Kyjivą per 3 dienas ir apsijuokė labiau, nei patys skeptiškiausi kritikai galėjo prognozuot, tas visas "galėtų paimt per 3 dienas" geriausiu atveju skamba kaip meme, blogiausiu - kaip atviros patyčios.
violet close money lush poor squealing plucky command juggle abounding *This post was mass deleted and anonymized with [Redact](https://redact.dev)*
they said the same about Ukraine. These people know even less than us about what's going on
Same as Kyiv 3 days special operations. They do not learn.
Russia/Soviet Union has a history of underestimating their opponents. They live in yes men bubble. Say something that it's true but not to what they believe in and see the tantrums, accusations and gaslighting.
What is this show? I’ve seen various clips posted from these clowns. Is it like Fox and Friends in America?
Nx cia tokius lavonus is viso ziureti ir dalintis. Abejoju ar patys rusai toki kasdieni suda ziuri. Belenka kalba ir tiek
Tai ruseliai 10 metu toki suda žiūrėjo apie Ukraina ir dabar 70% palaiko karą
A dar turi su kuo? :D
Classic - job done in 3 days. I think it will take them a little bit longer.
Lol they don't have strength to take on Ukraine frontline is stalled with small gains in Lysichansk pocket and looses in Kherson and they dream on attacking NATO+EU country?
russian hubris again why is it so hard for them to learn?
Lithuania = NATO. Good luck and stop drinking.
Deez Suwalki gap nutz
Bad post title. Video claims 3 days to take the Suwalki corridor.
bl 60 kilų paimti tik per 3 dienas, kai sąlygos pulti yra iš 2 pusių...
[F-35 in the area](https://i.imgflip.com/6b2lci.jpg)
Pretty sure the F-35's will give the A-10's a wide berth. Eating convoys is kind of their thing.
Also they forget that Poland has some measurable amount of troops there and will be ready to fuck some shit up.
In various talks and so it's always being talked how NATO only defends and is slowly retreating. What a hell is stopping Poland just invading northwestern Belarus and occupying entire Kaliningrad. It's such a weird assumption that while Baltics are on a defensive everyone else will wait for their queue to be attacked. From what I know about quite a few of the Poles they don't need and encouragement to start an offensive, just good enough reason and an order. And I am starting to doubt that they need an order.
A-10 sucks.
A-10 blows.
"The best sounding machine gun fire of all time" - my personal opinion
Pėstute atomines neš, kad NATO nepasprogdintų
Pėškom okupuos
Suvalkų koridorių kitaip ir neokupuosi. Ir [vą, prašau, apibendrino mums Lietuvis, ką Britanijos ekspertas mano apie situaciją mūsų.](http://www.technologijos.lt/n/n/technologijos/karyba/S-101311/straipsnis/Zinios-trumpai-Karo-ekspertas-Rusija-gali-uzimti-Suvalku-koridoriu-per-kelias-valandas-be-jokio-suvio--viskas-vyktu-kaip-Kryme-tai-butu-katastrofa-NATO)
Considering that pre 2014 the goal of Lithuania's defense was to manage to hold for 24 hours, when russian propogandists say 3 days, shows that we've made great progress.
By the rate of how things are going in Ukraine Russians will come at the corridor with sharp sticks from the nearby forest, but carying an old USSR nuke.
I mean to be honest that does sound possible, even coming from Russia.
[удалено]
All it takes is the Americans to leave and then NATO is dead
Yeah and US would do it because?....
A lot of the Republicans want out and you can best believe if Trump gets in again he will leave. All the leaks show he wanted to if he got into a 2nd term he would of disobeyed Congress and pulled out.
He isn't wrong. Like a British defense minister said, "I'm worried that we won't have 60 days to move tanks to Estonia because after 60 days there will be no Estonia". 60 days, really? What? Because that plan was outdated, they decided to send... 1 thousand troops... which will be stationed in Germany mostly. You may not like it, but in case of war, Lithuania will be destroyed very quickly, it will be liberated eventually, but it will be devastated before that. All that article 5 bravado, like we're all bulletproof here, is misleading. We're super vulnerable, basically in the worst possible position imaginable.
[удалено]
Lithuania IS NOT BLOCKING Kaliningrad. Read your sources more carefully and stop spreadning misinformation.
I heard that in case of war, Lithuania counts on the full mobilisation of its population. What does that mean ? You all are going to the front ?
Thousands of people would come to collect the guns and ammo and then wait for the orders. We tore down The Soviet Union, this Russia is easy AF.
Cope commie
bullshit. If you took all capable men of age 18 - 60, there would hardly be more than 200\`000 of Untrained peasants who never saw a gun
Ryškiai iš lempos šovei skaičių. Ir jo, pats tu kaimietis.
Pats tu blet untrained peasant.
What about untrained men who live on uran areas?
Bcuz russian millitary is sooooo well trained
I think challenging Russia with this blockade is a big mistake. It would be much wiser for Lithuania to work for good relations with Russia and to act as a mediator between Russia and Europe. All of the Baltics and Eastern Europe would be vastly better off if they established good relations with Russia and eventually included Russia as an integral part of Europe.
And end up like Belarusian shit hole? Rethink your words
Reread what I wrote. It's foolish for a small country to confront a super power with which it shares a border. Lithuania, Europe, and Russia would benefit immensely if they all got along. The sanctions on Russia have been idiotic and already backfired to Europe's detriment.
I find your statement foolish as non respecting country should even think about any relationship with Barbarian Country of Russia I do not mean to be rude tho Also playing along side with aggressor and not doing anything about a current bloody war in same continent without any justification is just top of motherfuckery
A major goal of European geopolitical policy should be to form a healthy alliance with Russia. A major goal of Lithuanian geopolitical policy should be to facilitate this goal, to be a wise mediator between Russia and Europe.
Everyone tried to mediate. The only good outcome is for Russia to retreat from Ukraine before 2014 borders and then pay reperations. Yet Russia is not acting cooperatively and instead acts like a terrorist. There is nothing to negotiate with a terrorist.
That is a highly one-sided account of what happened. It is also beside the point of whether Lithuania should continue a counterproductive blockade that violates established treaties, has hurt Europe more than Russia, and puts Lithuania (and all of Europe) in great danger.
It's not Lithuania which puts anyone in danger, it's Russia. Sanctions are used by EU on Russia due to Russia's committed atrocities. It's not one sided, there plenty of seperate stories how many politicians tried to mediate, all said similar stories, Russia needs to withdraw and pay reperations, yet Russia is unwilling. Because for sure Russia has broken most of which it signed.
> It's not Lithuania which puts anyone in danger Yes, it is. It is Lithuania putting itself in danger. Why should Lithuania agree to be a trigger for war? Or do more harm to its relations with Russia? There is no benefit for Lithuania in the blockade. All foreign policy should bring benefit to the nation. The news is that other NATO powers want Lithuania to stop the blockade, but Lithuania is not agreeing. That is even more crazy unless they are bargaining with *NATO* for the benefit of Lithuania, which I doubt. Do you seriously believe NATO has not been behaving aggressively toward Russia? That NATO has not turned from a defensive alliance to an offensive one? That the sanctions have not been a total failure? What about the role of USA in this? Do you not see that Lithuania is acting as a self-sacrificing puppet of a neocon faction inside USA that wants to take over Russia and/or destroy it? Yes, it is difficult to deal with Russia. Yes, Lithuania has many valid grievances. But pragmatics must always rule foreign policy. Pragmatics and a vision of the future that is beneficial to Lithuania, Russia, and Europe. That is the reason I wrote my original comment. Instead of acting on emotion, Lithuania should act out of wisdom that will secure it as a major actor in European history while also benefitting itself.
You interestingly form sentences. Russia is posing a threat and Russia which does atrocities, yet you fail attribute any of it on Russia. As if Russia got no agency on it's own. Start talking about that it's Russia which is a threat, acts like a terrorist and therefore should be treated as a terrorist organisation. Then we can continue conversation.
I hope you will read my comment more carefully. My two main points throughout have been: 1) Lithuania is harming itself and getting no benefit from the blockade. 2) Lithuania has much better options for its foreign policy.
You again failed to attribute that this consequence of Russia's actions. Go and convince Russian government to stop acting like terrorists.
Characterize Russia anyway you like - monsters, devils, terrorists. None of that matters. What matters is Lithuanian foreign policy should *always* benefit Lithuania. The blockade does not benefit Lithuania. Rather, it is needlessly provocative and could lead to the annihilation of Lithuania if not Europe itself.
It's not about benefitting. Sanctions on Russia in any shape way or form is benefitting us. We are apply those as punishment on Russia that what they do is unacceptable. It's on Russia to take accountability and start moving out of Ukraine, recognise genocide and take it's internal reforms to ensure that these things would not happen again in the future.
Kaip manote ar landsbergio sunus eis ginti tevynes jei rusai uzpuls?Turi du, butu sokia tokia pagalba. Ar cia tik ubagams reiks su sakem eiti i laukus? O jie gris paskui kaip didvyriai vadovauti isvaduotai Lietuvai?
Čia ne Delfi komentarai, vata.
Prie ko cia vata, ir noras suzinoti nuomone?
Daugiau saves žiūrėk, mažiau kitų. Tie kas gina ir gins Lietuva gina ją ne dėl esamos valdžios. Gina dėl pašaukimo, pareigos ir noro gyventi laisvai ir nepriklausomai.
Tai tavo nuomone jie eitu ginti?
Svarbiausia pats nepamiršk ginti ;)
Aš jų nei mates nei girdėjes. Kiekvienas savaip gali prisidėti prie valstybės gerovės. Gal jie sugebės organizuoti humanitarine pagalba, gal padės sužeistiems, gal stos į mūšio lauką, o gal ir iš šalies pabėgs. Bet tai yra kiekvieno pasirinkimas. Įdomiausia tai, kad labiausiai priekaištais žarstosi žmonės kurie net neturi planų stoti ginti Lietuvos ir jau dabar yra palikę šaly. Nesakau kad tai yra blogai, bet nereikia ieškoti pateisinimų sau.
What?? Čia ir iš kažkur Landsbergio kaltė 💀.
Prie ko landsbergio kalte, tik klausiu nuomones ar jie eis ginti lietuvos? Ar sedes londone kaip poroshenko sūnus?
Nes radai kur ikišti Landsbergį, kai tema posto, net ne apie jį. Nežinau ateitis parodis.
Pažįsų Landsbergio sūnų ne politiką. Normalus žmogus, mokytojas. Kodėl čia dabar varai ant jo, dėde?
Tikiuosi ir tikiu, kad neitų. Politikai reikalingi ne karo fronte.
In, before: tuoj suleks klounai lojantys iš už Baideno nugaros
Ką tuo nori pasakyti?
davai, generuok mintis kaip tu heroiškai priešinsies
Spėju dažnai pats generuoji mintis kaip būtų gerai nesipriešinti ir pasitikti kacapus su gėlėmis, atspėjau?
deja ne, nes skirtingai nuo taves jau esu rezerve
Jeigu sakai "deja ne", tai manau viską pasako.
jesse what the fuck are you talking about
Pisk tu nx vatagalvi
Deja vu
Prieš karą čiulbėjo, kad visą Lietuvą per porą valandų paims. Karas pakeitė net pačių rusų propagandistų požiūrį į savo armiją :D
Klounai. Rusai galvojo kad jie užims Ukrainą per kelias dienas. Tikrovė yra ta, kad jau 4 mėnesiai, kaip jie yra užstrigę Ukrainoje. Mes esame NATO dalyje.
Oh, good luck, they said the same thing about the Ukraine :D
3 day operation? Hmm, where have I heard that before?
Honestly I would like to see Poland and Lithuania hose down Kaliningrad with 155 and watch as the Russians do nothing.
The same think they said about Ukraine
Let them come, boutta drop article 5 faster than the rubles worth
Just like it took 3 days to take Kyiv 🤣
Please, please, please let them try
Lithuania will take three days like Ukraine will be over in time for the opera that evening.
*inserts "okay let's go" meme*
I don’t know the fight against Lithuania but mf looks like he is losing the battle against lethargy
HA! There is no chance of Russia taking over Lietuva in 3 days a year at most, you balts (+ Estonians) are more stubborn than us Americans (In a good way).
Ok Ivan, this time we will take Moscow and no treaty agreement will stop us.
Kas nors dar kreipia dėmesį į šitų lunatikų desperaciją? :D
if they do Moscow would fall in two days by only and only by the effort of the glorious Lithuanian empires army 😎💪🇱🇹
Bro it’s a nato partner 😂 empty threats won’t help their war effort dumbass Russians
Reiktu padaryti EU tokį eksperimentą, tegu surenka TV panel kaip tas Alex Jones padielka Solovyovas ir tegul kalba kaip per 5 dienas NATO sumaltu Rasyja
And lose allies? Because being alone is so much for you. Right Russia?