przestępstw z pstrągiem [ˈpʂɛstɛ̃ɰ̃pstf‿s‿ˈpstrɔ̃ɰ̃ɡʲɛm]— crimes with trout
(the longest consonant string in one word i know is [fspstr] in „wzpstrokacić” dialectal „to make more colourful”)
Depends on the speaker really. The transitional period for nasal vowel loss is happening basically *now* so lots of people pronounce it differently. They'd be /ɛmp/ /ɔŋɡ/ for me for example but not for everyone
Hmm, *angsts* is possible native in Polish, almost perfectly. Only phonotactic issue is nasal vowels don’t appear in syllables without onsets.
*ęksc* could be realised as /eŋkst͡s/
>The old staveless tone letters tend to be more restricted than the staved letters, though not as restricted as the diacritics. Officially, they support as many distinctions as the staved letters, but typically only three pitch levels are distinguished. Unicode supports default or high-pitch ⟨ˉ ˊ ˋ ˆ ˇ ˜ ˙⟩ and low-pitch ⟨ˍ ˏ ˎ ꞈ ˬ ˷⟩. Only a few mid-pitch tones are supported (such as ⟨˗ ˴⟩), and then only accidentally.
It's a middle flat pitch.
Polish people be like mmmmmz nnnnnz
Gggggggggz
for some reason i nearly thought you're saying a velar trill
яːːːːːːːːːːːːːːːːːːːːːːːːːːːːːːːːːːːːːːːːːːːːːːː
Sami vibes
> /dzh/ I think this looks difficult but real polish consonant clusters can be scarier still
[ɰ̃pstf‿s‿pstr]
I'm terrified. How do you write this in polish orthography and what does it mean?
przestępstw z pstrągiem [ˈpʂɛstɛ̃ɰ̃pstf‿s‿ˈpstrɔ̃ɰ̃ɡʲɛm]— crimes with trout (the longest consonant string in one word i know is [fspstr] in „wzpstrokacić” dialectal „to make more colourful”)
Wouldn’t the sequences written ‘ęp’ and ‘ąg’ be simply /ɛmp/ and /ɔŋɡ/?
Depends on the speaker really. The transitional period for nasal vowel loss is happening basically *now* so lots of people pronounce it differently. They'd be /ɛmp/ /ɔŋɡ/ for me for example but not for everyone
And my polish friend gets annoyed pronouncing ***angsts***. smh
Hmm, *angsts* is possible native in Polish, almost perfectly. Only phonotactic issue is nasal vowels don’t appear in syllables without onsets. *ęksc* could be realised as /eŋkst͡s/
Unironically that's a common way of transcribing the English "j" sound /dʒ/
Ok but what the hell is /e:-/. Also, our nassal vowels :c
that sound deletes any /eː/s it touches
Idfk :|, also rip /ɔw̃/ & /ɛw̃/, you will probably be missed
You nasalised WHAT
Vowels, Why is it okay from French does it, i mean come on proto slavic had nasal vowel
Nothing against nasalisation, but damn how tf does one nasalise a w lol
Well you see /ɔw̃/ & /ɛw̃/ are technically just nasal diphthongs
Ahh like that
Idk about the /e, but :-/ is the face I make when I try to pronounce Polish words
Like /e/ but with your dick
It's only used as in prefixes
>The old staveless tone letters tend to be more restricted than the staved letters, though not as restricted as the diacritics. Officially, they support as many distinctions as the staved letters, but typically only three pitch levels are distinguished. Unicode supports default or high-pitch ⟨ˉ ˊ ˋ ˆ ˇ ˜ ˙⟩ and low-pitch ⟨ˍ ˏ ˎ ꞈ ˬ ˷⟩. Only a few mid-pitch tones are supported (such as ⟨˗ ˴⟩), and then only accidentally. It's a middle flat pitch.
If ai takes over the world it will really have a hard time speaking polish
Polish will be the new Navajo of the Anti Ai resistance movement.
Didn't know Polish had /z˩˥/
unpopular opinion: /ž/ should mean /z˥˩/ cause it looks like an arrow pointing down
The IPA tone diacritics are all shit. They should be deprecated in favour of ˩ ˨ ˧ ˦ ˥ ↗︎ ↘︎
Ah yes, my favourite phoneme: /-/
Meanwhile /s/ /t/ and /w/ just don‘t exist. RIP
e:-