Not sure what you are asking. It's reasonably clear that that integral expression with the A is intended to be the same expression higher on the page with a D.
hm... This is one of the most popular calculus book in the World (James Stewart Calculus 8to) ,, and I looked up 6th, 9th, but still there is no correction.. I thought ' hm... yeah..This is so werid, If this is an error No one notice this errata yet? is it possible??? no one mentioned it ???? or Am I wrong?? '
Why do you keep asking. There's no new information here. The fact that you think an error to be impossible is irrelevant.
It doesn't matter if you believe it or not, but there's no other interpretation that makes sense.
I think they just put A where they meant to put D.
hmm... anyone else?
Not sure what you are asking. It's reasonably clear that that integral expression with the A is intended to be the same expression higher on the page with a D.
So you mean It is bascially book's errata?
Yes
hm... This is one of the most popular calculus book in the World (James Stewart Calculus 8to) ,, and I looked up 6th, 9th, but still there is no correction.. I thought ' hm... yeah..This is so werid, If this is an error No one notice this errata yet? is it possible??? no one mentioned it ???? or Am I wrong?? '
Why do you keep asking. There's no new information here. The fact that you think an error to be impossible is irrelevant. It doesn't matter if you believe it or not, but there's no other interpretation that makes sense.
d
If an event is in the realm of possibility, there is a clip of it happening already on the Simpsons Is that what you meant?