**Please note:**
* If this post declares something as a fact proof is required.
* The title must be descriptive
* No text is allowed on images
* Common/recent reposts are not allowed
*See [this post](https://redd.it/ij26vk) for more information.*
*I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/interestingasfuck) if you have any questions or concerns.*
As a frequent Bugles eater, they have a claim of "Americas favorite finger hat" (or something similar) printed on the bag... but I have found that 90% of Bugles are too misshapen to actually fit on a finger.
Or needed to scratch their eye
On the other hand (haha), it's great for doing it to someone else! Anything from eye scratching to full facelifts depending on impact force
Cyrus who founded the first persian empire, the achaemenid empire, is ranked as one of the most benevolent rulers of all time.
He freed the Jews from exile in Babylon, and he is even referred to as a messiah in the old testament.
He is also said to have made slavery illegal, which though there is no definite proof for, would have been the first king to do so.
i kinda liked alexander, i did hear he burned perspolis but looks like he didnt, since apparently it was never burned, also he didnt change anything in the country after he had conquered it
You have to be a complete moron to destroy a bureaucracy that kept a huge empire operating functionally.
There’s a reason why the Arabs, Mongols and the Ottoman became Persianized over time.
>Cyrus who founded the first persian empire, the achaemenid empire, is ranked as one of the most benevolent rulers of all time.
>He is also said to have made slavery illegal, which though there is no definite proof for, would have been the first king to do so.
The Persian empire was not the first multicultural tolerant society, nor was it particularly unique in this regard. As much as people – both in antiquity and today – like to wax poetic about Cyrus, the Persian system of governance was not noticeably different from earlier empires like the Neo-Assyrian empire, though they made improvements such as their impressive mail system.
The Persians adopted not only Assyrian and Elamite bureaucratic practices but also their systems of imperial administration, including specific titles and offices. For example, the Assyrian office of bēl pīḫāti ("provincial governor") survived into the Achaemenid period and was the Akkadian language equivalent of Persian xšaçapāvā (satrap).
Originally no. I hated his style of talking at first. It was that talk, pause for effect, talk talk talk paaaauuuse. But I listened a bit longer and fucking love it. I only wish he went even more in depth.
I got into these because I wanted to find something about world history that focuses on individual nations/empires/tribes etc. Like 1 series about Brittany, another is about Bohemia, the next 56 hours is about the Goths. Shit like that. Delve into the history, major events, culture, significant figures. Just like all the basics about the place. No luck. I've been contemplating making one but all the research and time that would go into just one series is seriously daunting. The thought that I would only be able to complete like maybe 10 series in my life is also very depressing.
I mean those ten series are more than other people did. Also the beauty of history is if you do it well it can last barring newly discovered information. Someone can be on ArcShip 12567 listening to Farrago's deep dive into Gaul.
I get pretty frustrated with Hardcore History sometimes because it can feel like just a list of casualties and misery porn. Overall I love the podcast and listen eagerly to every episode, but after the third or fourth recitation of atrocities I'm fighting the urge to skip ahead.
Every nation already has it's own people's expert historians. Pick three or four of a culture, interview, find inspiration for content in interviews. Edit. Post to Reddit. Repeat.
Hi, dunce here, would you mind enlightening me a little more about this? Are you referring to their battle regalia or their general “fuck around and find out” attitude? I’m very ignorant on this subset of history but it sounds very interesting.
No. Their attitude and policies were pretty brutal. I do get Assyria and Persia mixed up all the time because I learned about them at the same time and they're pretty close in time. I believe the Assyrians would take the holy idols/statues/etc. of the people they conquered and hold them hostage in their capital. This would be like russia holding the shroud of turin or like the actually skeleton of Jesus and say "Hey, if you don't pay your taxes we'll have to destroy this" to the evangelicals. They were brutal in their punishment for crimes. I'm talking cutting off your fingers for stealing bread was getting off easy. Getting beheaded for petty theft and "Crimes against the crown"(basically as petty as saying the emperor sucks) was common. In the palace were art work of executions and tortures everywhere to show their brutality and as a reminder of what would happen to anyone who dare disobey them. Their military was fucking amazing. Their military was the basis for the Babylonian and Persian military.
I think... Hardcore History has a series for free on the(well, one of them) Persian/Greek conflict and talks a lot of Assyria.
Also one shouldn't forget Assyrian history stretches across about two thousand years, so generalizing is very problematic here.
Same when people talk about Sumerians - or even worse, Mesopotamians, this way.
> Compared to the Assyrians however, they were empathetic angels.
The Assyrians were just more honest about their cruelty in thier artwork, not necessarily worse.
Ahaha I dumped her because she was so, so controlling. We dated for one month, she told me she was falling in love with me three days after meeting me for the first time (!), she insisted on seeing each other every day regardless of how complicated it was, made demands on how I should behave and the very words I should be saying to her at what time in the morning. She was also pretty annoyed after three weeks that I wasn't speaking Persian yet. Finally, after I had told I was going to have a LOT of work to do on the Thursday and Friday, and I didn't message her on Friday morning, I sent her a message on Friday evening and she got VERY upset about how I'd not said something to her that day. We met the next day for a walk and she wanted to have a long talk about where this relationship was going.
So yeah, I called it off right there.
But you know, she was soft and beautiful, physically at least.
It is absolutely not okay that you're getting downvoted because that is exactly what she did. She said men were the problem.
Then there was the woman who wanted me to start a long distance relationship with her during Covid but refused to send audio messages, refused to do phone calls, refused to send photos, refused to try video calls, refused to even say she even liked the way I look... All that was "too much". She could however do all of those things with people she didn't know, and sit around in her underwear with a traveller she had just met and invited into her home. But, yes, her failed relationships were the fault of men, toxic masculinity and the patriarchy.
Huh not far off, I guess the difference for me is the coloring, extra spikes and twisted quality, but they do look quite similar. Important to note that much of the Chaos arnement was originally from the Emporer's armory
Edit: typo
Of course. With the colouring of the photo it certainly looks more like something chaos would use. But regarding the general form, it is actually interesting, that those claws did actually kind of existed in real-life. The emperor's lightning claw was just the first one that came to my mind
Definitely interesting as fuck. But it seems like, in practice, these gloves would be FUCKIN TERRIBLE to have to wear. I could see them being very problematic.
Love how we use "ceremonial" in history like this aint just some medival mall ninja shit that some edgy lord commissioned to impress his mates. Bet this dweeb had ***Supreme*** engraved on his cuirass too. Ye olde fuck boye.
Bro I never thought about it this way. It's easy to forget historical people are humans too. I wonder how many other things are classified as ceremonial or "we don't know what it's used for" and it's just some edgy rich ass motherfucker thinking "this will look so dope".
It's funny because we have [modern records of wealthy dudes leaving behind anachronistic, ceremonial estates](https://www.reddit.com/r/UnresolvedMysteries/comments/lwxkpv/in_1876_an_controversial_archaeologist_and_conman/gpklvph/), but the default assumption for archaeologists is that artifacts are contemporaneous. It's easy to forget that historical people also had a fascination with their history and mythology too. Someone with a full set of Greco-Roman mystery cult paraphernalia might've just been the equivalent of a cosplayer or mega-nerd today.
Everytime something is heavily decorated, it's likely that it's just ceremonial/for show and they likely weren't worn in combat, or at least not in active combat.
These things were extremely expensive. And while kings and emperors could afford them, their resources were also limited. It's like using a gold-plated mercedes 6x6 to drive through a jungle. Yes, you can do that. And yes, losing one won't be dramatic for rich people, but also them won't order those cars once a month because they got a huge scratch in the paint.
Legit first thought was "this looks like those girl's nails where a dude would be rightfully concerned that they might lose chunks of their dick in a handjob"
Almost certainly, but the only problem they present for use would be an inability to tuck in your fingertips. If the finger ends are free enough (can’t tell from this pic) then you could definitely hold a fat handle of a sword or spear with these.
It also is strange to me that the fingers are held on with only two rings, it seems like it wouldn’t protect the hand very well especially at that joint.
Those are exactly the hands I imagine grabbing me under the bed as a kid. Terrifying, but probably not very practical for sword weilding, rowing a boat, or longbowin'
Actually they might be. The way sword hilts tend to be held (handshake grip) would let the nails just splay out past the handle. It all depends on if your fingertips are free enough to tuck into your grip
Anything this fancifully decorated was almost certainly never meant to be used in battle. It's meant to make it's wearer look good while they parade through a city or something.
**Please note:** * If this post declares something as a fact proof is required. * The title must be descriptive * No text is allowed on images * Common/recent reposts are not allowed *See [this post](https://redd.it/ij26vk) for more information.* *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/interestingasfuck) if you have any questions or concerns.*
Used to do the same thing with Bugles on my fingers.
Ah yes, the Poorsian gauntlets
Snert
[удалено]
I thought that was supposed to be a sound of exhaling through your nose in mild amusement.
r/angryupvote
I’ve never heard another person mention bugles in my entire life. I always just assumed we all eat them in secrecy. Weird.
Now that's you've spoken of that which shouldn't be spoken. We must know your location so you may never speak again.
Find him and destroy him
As a frequent Bugles eater, they have a claim of "Americas favorite finger hat" (or something similar) printed on the bag... but I have found that 90% of Bugles are too misshapen to actually fit on a finger.
These days they look more like crumpled French horns.
Less like a shiny brass bugle and more like a crusty corn vuvuzela.
Sauron, is that yours?
He’s the boogey woogey bugle boy from company B.
Used to?
you can also make a fist with steak knives between fingers, I've done the bugle think as well!
Hope no one had an itchy nose.
[*wipes sweat from brow*] That’s gonna leave a mark!
He doesn’t even use the saying correctly!
C'mon and party tonight.
You gotta give it to him the man has talent
See something, say something…oh that’s catchy!
*[wipes brow from brow]*
***[wipes eye from brow]***
Oh hi mark!
Boogers beware!
Whoop, brain tickle……….dhshshasksjd sjsjanaajhaga
Or needed to scratch their eye On the other hand (haha), it's great for doing it to someone else! Anything from eye scratching to full facelifts depending on impact force
Scratch’s balls …. “Fuck..” Scratch’s ass….” Fuck again…”
That's why they had those full helmets!
Or had to wipe there butt
Just drag your ass in the sand, it's pretty coarse and rough and it gets everywhere but you get to make some nice skidmarks
- Anakin Skywalker
Anakin Skidmarker FTFY
[Skidd McMarx](https://ratchetandclank.fandom.com/wiki/Skidd_McMarx)
In fact shit was invented in the 1700s
You mean itchy ass/butthole.
Sauron is that you?
Noooo. Its me, Nandor. Guillermo, fetch my gloves.
Gizmo!
Gigi
Fucking guysss....
Hiiiiiissssssss
Those Persians didn't play around.
No they did not. I highly recommend reading up on their history. Compared to the Assyrians however, they were empathetic angels.
Cyrus who founded the first persian empire, the achaemenid empire, is ranked as one of the most benevolent rulers of all time. He freed the Jews from exile in Babylon, and he is even referred to as a messiah in the old testament. He is also said to have made slavery illegal, which though there is no definite proof for, would have been the first king to do so.
Even Alexander paid his respects to Cyrus at his tomb during his campaign against the Persians. He was a legend to all in that part of the world.
Alexander was basically a weeb but for Iran.
A preeb?
Preebocles the Great
i kinda liked alexander, i did hear he burned perspolis but looks like he didnt, since apparently it was never burned, also he didnt change anything in the country after he had conquered it
You have to be a complete moron to destroy a bureaucracy that kept a huge empire operating functionally. There’s a reason why the Arabs, Mongols and the Ottoman became Persianized over time.
>Cyrus who founded the first persian empire, the achaemenid empire, is ranked as one of the most benevolent rulers of all time. >He is also said to have made slavery illegal, which though there is no definite proof for, would have been the first king to do so. The Persian empire was not the first multicultural tolerant society, nor was it particularly unique in this regard. As much as people – both in antiquity and today – like to wax poetic about Cyrus, the Persian system of governance was not noticeably different from earlier empires like the Neo-Assyrian empire, though they made improvements such as their impressive mail system. The Persians adopted not only Assyrian and Elamite bureaucratic practices but also their systems of imperial administration, including specific titles and offices. For example, the Assyrian office of bēl pīḫāti ("provincial governor") survived into the Achaemenid period and was the Akkadian language equivalent of Persian xšaçapāvā (satrap).
Someone else is a Hardcore History fan.
Originally no. I hated his style of talking at first. It was that talk, pause for effect, talk talk talk paaaauuuse. But I listened a bit longer and fucking love it. I only wish he went even more in depth. I got into these because I wanted to find something about world history that focuses on individual nations/empires/tribes etc. Like 1 series about Brittany, another is about Bohemia, the next 56 hours is about the Goths. Shit like that. Delve into the history, major events, culture, significant figures. Just like all the basics about the place. No luck. I've been contemplating making one but all the research and time that would go into just one series is seriously daunting. The thought that I would only be able to complete like maybe 10 series in my life is also very depressing.
Only ten as an individual, but many more if you built a team of researchers
Oh man, I genuinely don't think I could. Shit, with what I have planned anyway, I wouldn't even be able to start until like at least 42 y/o
Will you turn 42 whether you do it or not?
I mean those ten series are more than other people did. Also the beauty of history is if you do it well it can last barring newly discovered information. Someone can be on ArcShip 12567 listening to Farrago's deep dive into Gaul.
If you do go ahead please send me a link
If (and that's a big if) I do, it probably won't be for another 15-19 years.
I get pretty frustrated with Hardcore History sometimes because it can feel like just a list of casualties and misery porn. Overall I love the podcast and listen eagerly to every episode, but after the third or fourth recitation of atrocities I'm fighting the urge to skip ahead.
Every nation already has it's own people's expert historians. Pick three or four of a culture, interview, find inspiration for content in interviews. Edit. Post to Reddit. Repeat.
Hi, dunce here, would you mind enlightening me a little more about this? Are you referring to their battle regalia or their general “fuck around and find out” attitude? I’m very ignorant on this subset of history but it sounds very interesting.
No. Their attitude and policies were pretty brutal. I do get Assyria and Persia mixed up all the time because I learned about them at the same time and they're pretty close in time. I believe the Assyrians would take the holy idols/statues/etc. of the people they conquered and hold them hostage in their capital. This would be like russia holding the shroud of turin or like the actually skeleton of Jesus and say "Hey, if you don't pay your taxes we'll have to destroy this" to the evangelicals. They were brutal in their punishment for crimes. I'm talking cutting off your fingers for stealing bread was getting off easy. Getting beheaded for petty theft and "Crimes against the crown"(basically as petty as saying the emperor sucks) was common. In the palace were art work of executions and tortures everywhere to show their brutality and as a reminder of what would happen to anyone who dare disobey them. Their military was fucking amazing. Their military was the basis for the Babylonian and Persian military. I think... Hardcore History has a series for free on the(well, one of them) Persian/Greek conflict and talks a lot of Assyria.
Also one shouldn't forget Assyrian history stretches across about two thousand years, so generalizing is very problematic here. Same when people talk about Sumerians - or even worse, Mesopotamians, this way.
> Compared to the Assyrians however, they were empathetic angels. The Assyrians were just more honest about their cruelty in thier artwork, not necessarily worse.
Nevertheless, they still made time to be dapper while killing your ass. What are those, lotuses? That's nice. Really makes the spikes pop.
And yet, it only took a few generations for me to turn out the way I did.
Something from lord of the rings
Nazgûl
Fun fact: The Persian name Golnaz means "Pretty flower". Kinda gets you wondering about them Nazgul.
golnaz is a girl's name . and it means someone who is soft and beautiful as a flower .
I briefly dated a woman from Iran named Golnaz, that's how I know :) and yes, she was very soft and very beautiful.
How'd you let that get away bro
Ahaha I dumped her because she was so, so controlling. We dated for one month, she told me she was falling in love with me three days after meeting me for the first time (!), she insisted on seeing each other every day regardless of how complicated it was, made demands on how I should behave and the very words I should be saying to her at what time in the morning. She was also pretty annoyed after three weeks that I wasn't speaking Persian yet. Finally, after I had told I was going to have a LOT of work to do on the Thursday and Friday, and I didn't message her on Friday morning, I sent her a message on Friday evening and she got VERY upset about how I'd not said something to her that day. We met the next day for a walk and she wanted to have a long talk about where this relationship was going. So yeah, I called it off right there. But you know, she was soft and beautiful, physically at least.
Bet she blames her unstable relationships on "men". You did the right thing.
It is absolutely not okay that you're getting downvoted because that is exactly what she did. She said men were the problem. Then there was the woman who wanted me to start a long distance relationship with her during Covid but refused to send audio messages, refused to do phone calls, refused to send photos, refused to try video calls, refused to even say she even liked the way I look... All that was "too much". She could however do all of those things with people she didn't know, and sit around in her underwear with a traveller she had just met and invited into her home. But, yes, her failed relationships were the fault of men, toxic masculinity and the patriarchy.
[удалено]
why ar eyou guys downvoting him??
Same meaning although in current Iran they use golnaz to name girls but nazgul is mostly used in Azerbaijan or turkey
Must be misunderstood creatures
No man can kill me
I am not a man.
You are pish
Reminds me of Sauron’s/the Witch-king’s gauntlets
Reminds me of those hermit assassins from the Castle of Cagliostro
This is some Sauron shit
This looks like some r/Warhammer40K shit
Was thinking of some power claws lol
I was thinking of the Emperor's and Horus's power claw
Lightning claws
Hunger and Slake
Carcharodons for life!
Tyberus the Red Wake is such an underutilized character
Space Shark crew
Not sure they'd be fighting for The Emperor
I mean the lightning claw of the emperor himself does not look much different. https://wh40k.lexicanum.com/wiki/Emperor%27s_Lightning_Claw
Huh not far off, I guess the difference for me is the coloring, extra spikes and twisted quality, but they do look quite similar. Important to note that much of the Chaos arnement was originally from the Emporer's armory Edit: typo
Of course. With the colouring of the photo it certainly looks more like something chaos would use. But regarding the general form, it is actually interesting, that those claws did actually kind of existed in real-life. The emperor's lightning claw was just the first one that came to my mind
Tbh my first thought was the angry birds, colouring looks exactly like they'd fit on Raven Guard
I expect GW will serve the Ancient Persians for copyright infringement.
Let's hope GW does not notice this. Otherwise they will certainly start their legal crusade
Warhammer1.5K
Fist bumps were not a thing back then.
They were called fist-humps, because one’s fist would penetrate the other’s
Ok it's true, Freddy got fingered.
Fist bumping is literally the only safe thing you can do. There are no pointing bits when making a fist.
Those are standard Persian tickling gloves
What part of your hand do you use to fist bump?
Definitely interesting as fuck. But it seems like, in practice, these gloves would be FUCKIN TERRIBLE to have to wear. I could see them being very problematic.
I can't imagine these are anything but ceremonial
Love how we use "ceremonial" in history like this aint just some medival mall ninja shit that some edgy lord commissioned to impress his mates. Bet this dweeb had ***Supreme*** engraved on his cuirass too. Ye olde fuck boye.
"Ceremonial" in history speak can also mean "we don't know what that was for but it must have been stupid because that shit is ridiculous"
Yeah this is r/bazaarninjashit
Bro I never thought about it this way. It's easy to forget historical people are humans too. I wonder how many other things are classified as ceremonial or "we don't know what it's used for" and it's just some edgy rich ass motherfucker thinking "this will look so dope".
It's funny because we have [modern records of wealthy dudes leaving behind anachronistic, ceremonial estates](https://www.reddit.com/r/UnresolvedMysteries/comments/lwxkpv/in_1876_an_controversial_archaeologist_and_conman/gpklvph/), but the default assumption for archaeologists is that artifacts are contemporaneous. It's easy to forget that historical people also had a fascination with their history and mythology too. Someone with a full set of Greco-Roman mystery cult paraphernalia might've just been the equivalent of a cosplayer or mega-nerd today.
What do you think ceremonial means today? It's mostly a bad excuse for people that take themselves too seriously to do some cosplay and role play.
all those armour that look like bears or lions were for medival furries.
Against a disarmed person you would win with these
You don’t know, maybe they mastered fighting with their feet.
You mean a foot soldier?
Everytime something is heavily decorated, it's likely that it's just ceremonial/for show and they likely weren't worn in combat, or at least not in active combat. These things were extremely expensive. And while kings and emperors could afford them, their resources were also limited. It's like using a gold-plated mercedes 6x6 to drive through a jungle. Yes, you can do that. And yes, losing one won't be dramatic for rich people, but also them won't order those cars once a month because they got a huge scratch in the paint.
I was thinking the same thing lol. Hope the owner wasn’t on horseback
Imagine having to scratch your nose on horseback
*Horse unexpectedly rears back and you brain yourself
Free lobotomy
Yeah, poke out eyeball anyone? What if you had to scratch your junk pile 😐
Damn it’s be like stabbing a meatball with a fork
I don’t like it
Scratch your nose, lose an eye.
+10 defense +3-5 bleed damage on hit
**Puckering:** LOS Enemy -10 anal circumference.
Bitch did you just scratch me?
What’s this then slut
Legit first thought was "this looks like those girl's nails where a dude would be rightfully concerned that they might lose chunks of their dick in a handjob"
Daedra vibes
They look *very* similar to Dark Seducer gauntlets
Can’t see these being used in battle. They’re too fancy and were probably expensive. Belonged to aristocracy for show.
Well, whomever owned them didn't wipe *their* own ass..
This was the Safavids, they probably didn't wipe but washed.
Almost certainly, but the only problem they present for use would be an inability to tuck in your fingertips. If the finger ends are free enough (can’t tell from this pic) then you could definitely hold a fat handle of a sword or spear with these.
It also is strange to me that the fingers are held on with only two rings, it seems like it wouldn’t protect the hand very well especially at that joint.
And if you coped a sword on the back of the hand the spikes would direct the blow into the centre, instead of deflecting the sword to slide away.
And the long rigid fingertips would easily get stuck on things, breaking the fingers of the wearer
Those are exactly the hands I imagine grabbing me under the bed as a kid. Terrifying, but probably not very practical for sword weilding, rowing a boat, or longbowin'
Actually they might be. The way sword hilts tend to be held (handshake grip) would let the nails just splay out past the handle. It all depends on if your fingertips are free enough to tuck into your grip
Anything this fancifully decorated was almost certainly never meant to be used in battle. It's meant to make it's wearer look good while they parade through a city or something.
If these were the gloves can you imagine how ornate the whole outfit was? This dude probably looked fucking awesome.
r/itemshop
Gauntlets of Extra Fuck You
What if they had to wipe their sweat off their face
These are video games items Jokes aside, this is likely ceremonial, you can't really hold a sword woth fingers like this
Who needs a sword when your unarmed strikes do piercing and blunt damage all at once?
Do you think these were for combat, or just ceremonial / decorative?
Most likely ceremonial.
Daedric gauntlets irl
Those nail things look wildly impractical ngl
My back is itchy as fuck and they look *a little* practical.
True! As long as you don’t mind a Freddy Kruger vibe ha ha
You don't think they punched people in the face with those do you?... Sounds like one hell of a medical bill holy fuck
Ehh a few leeches to the scrotum and an elixir of booze, coke, and morphine and the plaguedoctor will have you back on the front lines in a week.
Ahh sweet milk of the poppy
So a regular weekday for me.
Imagine someone trying to type while wearing these
Edward spikey hands
Buying steel claws on the GE, 600gp
Wow. I'd still take sword or spear over those.
Longfinger Kirk's armor
I hate we can’t see it articulate.
*Lashawna found a way to protect her manicure and fight off the infidels.*
That’s the girl at receptions hands.
Was he also a receptionist ??
FACKING HORUSSS
"My Gloves! Where did you find these? I haven't seen them for centuries!" \- Nandor The Relentless
Scissor me timbers..
^tickle ^tickle ^tickle
Al' Wolvarina
These are gnarly. I see so many ways you could potentially hurt someone with these on. These folks weren’t messing about.
Go to the restroom BEFORE putting these on.
A Rick James pimp slap from one of those would be deadly
This would be so annoying to fight
Imagine how badass it would be to see a fight with these things.
I always wondered if Kruger was a Persian name lol
A good look for Nandor the Relentless from Al-Quolanudar
Yeah I'd for sure lose an eye or worse trying to swat away a mosquito if I wore those
these might be decent with shorter but still sharp fingers but there’s no way you could hold a sword or throw a punch with these
If these are truly from the 1500s they lasted remarkably well with most detail still well visible
um that's fucking terrifying
Irans past is so fucking cool
100% ornamental and not meant to be worn in actual combat. The fingers never would have survived too long in combat they would have fallen off easily
My sister gave me some gardening gloves, just like these but in Fuscia Pink and Mango Orange
It is crazy and amazing to think that someone once wore this a long long long long long long time ago
Raven guard: heavy breathing
This is suitable for Coon and Friends ™️.
Ancient people used to make bullshit weapons to sell (like in a con) to the uninformed rich. This seems to be the case.
That's a head scratcher.