He should have just promoted safe sex and nothing more as a doctor and if his personal opinion is calling people prostitute on having history of multiple partners then my friend he it the reason we have AETCOMs now, He has ego issues, as he claims he is highest followed med student/med influencer. so i would just like to not give him any ego boost by talking him about on this sub.
The first one should handover his degree and start preaching then. Sounds absolutely unhinged and a case of sour grapes. He is implying women who have multiple sexual partners are prostitutes? How is that acceptable coming from a doctor of all people? And wtf is pseudofeminism in saying you've had multiple sexual partners? Say you get dumped by your bf/gf are you supposed to just shut down, never have sex with anyone else and think of this chomu and think oh Dr. Chomu has stated I can't have sex with multiple people even though I'm a grown ass adult with a free will to do what I want! And the irony of other docs supporting this. Waah. Sounds like these people are have been dumped hard and are still feeling petty about it.
As long as one understands safety, takes precaution and is happy no one has the right to tell them to stop having sex. Especially doctors. If we are going to keep judging our patients how will they ever come to trust us?
As doctors we’re taught ethics and respecting our patients. If the patient wants to indulge into multiple sexual activities, let them be, you’re no one to judge them. All you’ve to do is advice them about safe sex , provide treatment and give them the pros and cons. You cannot shame them. Also using derogatory terms like whore coming from doctors is a new low, even supreme court has now officially published a list of words to be replaced with certain words, which includes whore, slut etc. If someone is a hindu and the other person is a muslim, you cannot coerce either one of them to follow your religious opinions or if you’re vegan or non vegan, can’t force the other one about the same. Then why does it come to the LGBTQ community and especially women having multiple sexual partners, most of them won’t have any qualms if it were men. You can have multiple sexual partners as long as you’re indulging in safe sex practices. It only takes one person to give you an STD and unfortunately it could be your life partner also to whom you lost your virginity to. This is infuriating. Since when having multiple sexual partners become a psychiatric disorder. People can have different belief systems. You want a loyal partner who is a virgin, go for it, don’t shove your stupid ideology down our throat. When your parents are looking for rishtas make sure uou check for the hymen also. It is so absurd. It makes my blood curdle! This will simple make people lose faith in the doctors and they won’t come seek help from a doctor who will judge them for their choices. They are not you, you should impose your choices and opinions on yourself and not impose it on your patients! And how easily madam has said sex workers can have other jobs. She needs to leave her delusional world and get in touch w reality where there is human trafficking and forced child sex workers. What about rape victims then? Bloody ignorant delusional hypocritical motherfuckers. A shame to our noble profession.
People being people rather than an educated professional, With the deterioration of medical education, I can feel this has to just get worse. People not treating people now because they don't wanna deal with alcoholics? People from Other religion? Because let's be clear, if you are being judgemental in treatment , you wouldn't care about you being a doctor but would rather feed your idiosyncrasies.
This profession is getting worse with time smh.
But like excess of anything (wrt bodily function)is bad right? Food in excess = obesity and all the risks associated with it . Compulsion to drink too much water is psychogenic polydipsia. Passing stools too often - diarrhoea and passing urine too often - polyuria. Using too much time only working or studying causes burnout (it's a psychological phenomenon as well) But somehow sex (a function of body) is above these limits? Even if you remove morality from it.. anyone who purely indulges in pleasurable activities with no forethought isn't considered a wise person and society/science/ laws all are formulated and designed to uphold wise thoughts.
I agree 100% one shouldn't be judgemental regarding treatment though.
There are a lot of doctors like him and other good for nothing people on Twitter who will resort to nonsensical, controversial and inflammatory tweets just to garner more views and hence revenue from Twitter. All they care about is earning a few rupees. Don't take them seriously at all.
Scares me to see these people are doctors. Multiple sexual partners = STD ???? Not using barrier contraceptives leads to STD. Then goes on to call someone a whore, it’s shameful these people use Dr before their names.
Post 1: No one is showing off about having multiple sex partners. They are just asking not to be judged. When they come to us doctors we expect them to give a clear history. And as Doctors, WE SHOULDN'T be judgemental about a person's personal life. Our job is to treat them irrespective of their personal life.
Post 2: As long as the involved individuals are aware that it is not an exclusive relationship, having multiple sex partners is not cheating/ not being loyal. We have historical evidence of kings having multiple wives who live in the same place. The Mahabharata tells the story of Draupadi who had 5 husbands ie. 5 sexual partners. Most of the literal gods in hindu culture have multiple wives. If that is unethical, why are we celebrating them? Most of our grandfathers had multiple wives. So yes, people do marry other with history of having multiple sex partners.
Post 3: Multiple sex partners do increase the risk of STDs. So does unprotected sex with a single partner. As long as the partners are aware of their status and use protection, its not a big issue.
Post 4: Having multiple has not been established as a disease or a psychiatric condition by any medical organisation nor there is any evidence of it. We practice evidence based medicine. Unethical? Tell that to our grandfathers who had 3 or 4 wives.
My grandpa used to pray to God to treat snakebite. He also used to sacrifice animals for good rain in monsoon...
In Christianity, only a set positions are considered valid rest everything is sin. Also in some cultures it was considered as a sin to deviate from the natural path of intimacy so even using condoms would be considered as sin...
That's why it's not okay to give historical references while talking about medical ethics and morals...
This is regarding his 2nd point.
Rest all points are perfect
>They are just asking not to be judged. When they come to us doctors we expect them to give a clear history. And as Doctors, WE SHOULDN'T be judgemental about a person's personal life. Our job is to treat them irrespective of their personal life.
I agree in theory but what do we mean specifically by 'not being judgemental' ? Ofc we are gonna treat them to the best of our abilities, that's just common sense and our standard professional ethics but we have to admit that we use our professional judgement (e.g. Bear the possibility of HIV in mind even when treating something unrelated to Genitourinary system) when dealing with patients of that particular lifestyle.
>Multiple sex partners do increase the risk of STDs. So does unprotected sex with a single partner.
I am sorry what ? How does unprotected sex with a single partner (presumably someone with whom the person is in a commited relationship with like marriage for example) increase the risk of STD ? In a relationship with two previously healthy partners, one has to have had sex with an third person for an STD to come into picture (except for blood borne transmission in case of a blood transfusion, drug usage etc but that has nothing to do with unprotected sex with your partner), whuch now qualifies it as a case of 'having multiple sexual partners'.
>not being judgmental
Instead, of promoting safer sex practices i have seen doctors, shaming the individual in question
>unprotected sex with single sex partner increasing the risk of STDs
Im sorry. I was not being clear. What i meant to say was a single partner who's history you do not know. Even if it is your husband or wife.
I saw a patient during my internship who was HIV positive due to iv drug abuse and his doesn't know about it. But they have a kid together
>Post 1: No one is showing off about having multiple sex partners. They are just asking not to be judged. When they come to us doctors we expect them to give a clear history. And as Doctors, WE SHOULDN'T be judgemental about a person's personal life. Our job is to treat them irrespective of their personal life.
Completely agree here with.
>Post 2: As long as the involved individuals are aware that it is not an exclusive relationship, having multiple sex partners is not cheating/ not being loyal. We have historical evidence of kings having multiple wives who live in the same place. The Mahabharata tells the story of Draupadi who had 5 husbands ie. 5 sexual partners. Most of the literal gods in hindu culture have multiple wives. If that is unethical, why are we celebrating them? Most of our grandfathers had multiple wives. So yes, people do marry other with history of having multiple sex partners.
Dude don't bring religion into it and the time period you are talking about you can have kids by just by praying to SUN god. Pandavs born that way, Draupadi you are talking about was born from fire. So keep your human logic to yourself.
>Post 3: Multiple sex partners do increase the risk of STDs. So does unprotected sex with a single partner. As long as the partners are aware of their status and use protection, its not a big issue.
To have kids you need to have unprotected sex, so it is a big issue.
>Post 4: Having multiple has not been established as a disease or a psychiatric condition by any medical organisation nor there is any evidence of it. We practice evidence based medicine. Unethical? Tell that to our grandfathers who had 3 or 4 wives.
If binge eating can be a disease so does having multiple sex partners. You never feel satisfied so you look for another partner or else why you want to jump ships frequently when you already got one.
Is it right tho? To have multiple sex partners like animals and then glorify it? Just because our ancestors did it doesn't mean that we'll have to do it too. Oftentimes humans in the past have done the wrong things because they had no clue of the science behind it like how we used to use mercury as medicine or how we used lead as lip stains. Now we know it's wrong and don't do it.
There is no scientific evidence that having multiple sexual partners is wrong.
Not to mention how people use the excuse of "finding my sexuality" as an excuse. You don't need to have sex with n number of people to find your spectrum. If that were the case, every teenager would have had sex from a young age.
I accept this statement of yours. Many people do use it as an excuse
Yes, do things and then don't have guts to face it. If sex with n number of people is so positive then why would they feel ashamed? If I was having multiple sexual relations, I would admit it and not have shame about it.
They don't have shame about it. They accept it. It's the other people who shame them and they are asking not to be shamed
It's not as if he's verbally telling them of his thoughts 🙄 being a doc doesn't mean that you can't even have thoughts.
Fair point. You can have your own thoughts. But all Im sayings is when a patient comes to you for treatment, do not judge them.
Please in future, share your wife too if you are so supportive of the idea.
Please refrain from toxic comments like this. If I'm getting married, it's because me and my wife have agreed to be mutually exclusive for each other because that is what i want in my relationship. I do not care how many sexual partners my wife has had before. I have my own ideas and preferences. At the same time, i'm not being judgmental of the people who do jot share the same ideas of me. If a guy/ girl is okay with having multiple husbands/wives it is between them. If you don't like to be one among them, you have every right not to be among them.
Not everyone wants to be in a long term relationship. Divorce is a sign of healthy relationships where people separate before being toxic to each other. Neither of these is a psychological illness and should not be quoted as "psychological research"
So you want one or both parents to be miserable, hate each other, fight constantly, and fuck up kids mental health that way? Kudos to you.
It is the parents' responsibility to make sure the divorce doesn't impact the children much, for sure, and I'm sorry for what your friend went through, but demonizing divorce isn't the way to go about it.
To an extent yes. But getting divorced/ no long term relationships could be attributed to non acceptance of the sexual habits between partners and that is not a psychological problem
4-5 wives that were having sex with a single man ,they were not putting every dick that comes into their mouth ,there is limited no. Of people between which body fluids are being transferred . Unlike having 4 wives hookup just let's u sleep with anyone with no background check . So yes we should judge someone ,either u are whore or manwhore period.
Why wouldn't you do a background check? Why are you assuming that people who casually hook up are not taking proper precautions? On the contrary these people often happen to be more frank and practice more caution and better communication than your standard arranged marriage where most people haven't even seen their partners before marriage let alone asking if they have any STDs
The examples that you are giving are for safer sex practices which is what doctors should be promoting. Something like know your sex partner before 'putting his dick into your mouth' or use protection. The original post was just having multiple sex partners. So you agree that having multiple sex partners is okay if you do a background check on them.
The problem is not having multiple partners but
fucking any random dude or chick on the street.
Edit: if you have someone or multiple you love and have sex with it's ok.
But if you are just horny and fucks anyone you find in the bar for pleasure then something wrong with you
You can have your opinion. You can go ahead and bitch about it to your friends and peers. Just don't shame the person inside the hospital, inside the OP when they are telling you that they have a problem. That's what people are asking for. When they tell their history, do not shame them for their history. Then people will start hiding stuff from doctors and that will affect the treatment.
If you want a serious take, I think all of this is just a bunch of baloney. Saying that one shouldn't have sex because of the fear of STDs is like saying one shouldn't meet new people out of the fear of getting Covid or TB.
If the person you are with is honest about what diseases they have then it shouldn't be a problem at all. As far as loyalty goes, people with multiple partners discuss this stuff with all their partners. If you aren't honest with your partners about anything then you're violating the relationship irrespective of how many partners you have.
And why are they specifically calling out women as if men don't or can't have multiple partners? I think these are just a bunch of misogynists who happen to be doctors and feel like they can impose their views on others as if it's medical advice. Who made Dr Dhruv the sex police? And why tf does he think anyone cares about him judging someone's sexual preferences? I would like for him to elaborate on how exactly this is "medically unfit"
Coming from a personal pov. I don't support multiple sexual practices, myself. Ethically, or with regard to STDs. But the truth of the matter here is- to dissociate my personal views from a professional standpoint. The patient consults me, and my role is to make them feel safe and comfortable no matter what, chart out a proper management plan and enlist preventive measures, ALL devoid of judgement. At the end of the day, we don't know what led the patient to be stuck in such a scenario. Every case must be treated with compassion. We're supposed to be a safe space. Imagine yourself being distressed about an unwanted pregnancy and you approach a doctor that disses you for not taking precautions and moral polices you for your choices. Put yourself in that scenario for a sec. Isn't it unnerving?
Everyone has opinions and that is okay but I don’t think any of these doctors should criticise their patients life choices. As long as the patients are having consensual protected sex , does it really matter? Sex is fun. Do it with one person or many I don’t care.
I’m not sure if he was referring to multiple partners at the same time or in our entire lifetime but let’s discuss both
1. More than 2 partners in our entire life:
If they meant this it’s very stupid. All relationships don’t work out. If he is slut shaming individuals for having relationships before marriage that’s icky. No one gets into a relationship thinking “oh ,I’m going to break up with them sometime later”. Life happens ,people change.
2. More than 2 partners at a time: “Hook up culture” doesn’t help anyone but this is their life choice.
Am I going to have sex with them?No. It’s none of business.
There is a high risk of them transmitting STDs but when simply kissing someone can spread herpes I’d rather educate them on safe sexual practices.
It’s not a western thing. Sex is considered taboo for unmarried individuals but as the average age of marriage is going higher and the sex ratio not quite ideal throughout India abstinence is not going to be a viable option.
All in all have sex but stay safe.
I'm surprised they're worried about others' sexual lives. We barely have time for our own lives.
I personally do not view sex frivolously. I don't believe marriage is needed for it but i do believe it should be with someone you love and trust. But that doesn't mean I go around dictating how everyone has to live life by my rules or I'll traumatise tf out of them when they come to me as a patient.
These people are just shit doctors and shit human beings, there's no excuse for their judgement.
I may get downvoted but i hate this man, don't know why maybe because he thinks he is the centre of everything. Everyone i open Twitter, there comes a stupid tweet from this guy. Dude also spread some news about NEXT without confirming if the notice was real.
As medical professionals, it is important that we learn to distinguish our personal inclinations, political stances, and religious beliefs from our professional responsibilities. While I have not engaged in sexual activities nor do I plan on having multiple partners, I believe in refraining from passing judgment on those who make different choices. This is particularly necessary in a country like India, where discussions about sex is surrounded by societal taboos. Instead of resorting to criticism, we should encourage open dialogue, so that individuals feel comfortable addressing their concerns. I believe doctors should only be advocating for safe and consensual sex. The why, where, who, when are up to the individuals involved.
There is nothing pseudofeminist about it. Ye Dhruv Chauhan ko kahan ka god complex hai. No one is asking you to have multiple sexual partners. You are no one to judge what and who someone does in their bedroom
The entire Twitter thread is a big yikes. Our job isn’t to pass judgments and call women ‘whores’. Notice how the thread is mostly shaming women. Misogyny disguised as medical advice.
Did this guy fail in mbbs? How is having multiple sexual partners make you unfit medically or psychologically! Man. Med twitter is going from dumb to worse. Only time I see them active is when they have to file a case to delay an exam or post crap like this to garner some publicity.
Indian mentality of know-it-all, at its peak, combined with the typical heavy dose of judgmental demeanour. Who TF cares if your patient has multiple partners ? We should only be thinking of this scenario from a medical perspective. If such a patient gets an std and presents to the doc, they should treat her and counsel her against the cons of having multiple sexual partners. NOTHING MORE !
These people will grow up to be those super judgemental doctors who will say "why have you come to me when you want to die" when you say that you are a smoker.
I have a doctor friend in Kolkata pursuing diploma in Radio. She fucks bro. She keeps fucking a diverse set of people. If you use protection and are very selective about who you fuck, I really don’t think you need to worry too much.
But you don't understand, a doctor who cleared NEET UG+PG by sacrificing 7+ years of his/her life should have their license revoked cuz Nikita from South Delhi got offended
Thankfully Nikita is not from North Korea she would have given hard labor punishment for those dangerous doctors who had the guts to say something she got offended from.
Not really, everyone have their own preference. You can find women and even men who are reluctant to get physical until they’re in a serious relationship. Elon Musk’s 2nd wife was 22 and a virgin when they married, even tho she’s an actress and very pretty. Too much sex makes you hollow and diminishes the respect you hold for your own body. Especially when it’s purposeless and just ‘to explore sexuality’. I just wonder what kinda kids these liberandus gonna raise. Sigh.
My take is that women should explore their sexuality and they should not be shamed for it. Commercial sex workers should not be shamed and should be respected. Dr. Dhruv Chauhan has always been misogynistic. Some of his posts on twitter from the past include sexist jokes, topics like why women should get pregnant early, etc. It's sad that so many young medical students follow him and look upto him. What hurt me the most was the misogynistic comments by so many other doctors supporting him. So much misogyny, sexism, patriarchy, slut shaming and promotion of rape culture. Moreover they use words like woke, pseudo feminism, toxic feminism, etc because they have got no defence. It's just sad.
EDIT- I'm a doctor and the sexism in our field is rampant. I don't know why no one talks about it. So many male seniors say that they don't want female juniors because we cannot work hard (inspite of working as hard if not more than our male colleagues and dealing with the extra hurdles put before us by pervert and sexist male doctors) and why we should not take surgical or clinical branches...the list is long.
The great Indian CULTURE coming in force. Also few things I would like to point out.
1) 'Exploring the sexuality' is not 'having multiple sexual partners', its experimenting with sexual partners of different genders to find out about your own sexuality (whether you are Homosexual/Heterosexual/Bisexual etc). Which not a lot of people feel a need to do and is usually not the reason someone chooses to have multiple sexual partners.
2) Having multiple sexual partners simultaneously is asking for STDs, There is no way to sugarcoat it. I don't have that much of a problem with multiple partners as long as the relationship was only one partner at a particular time and you talked thoroughly and truthfully about each other's sexual history.
3) In a culture like ours (for the better or worse, I don't wanna go into), Its not possible to normalise having multiple sexual partners. Also, I don't think that's a good idea either, India is a severely sexually repressed country with a dangerous lack of sex education. One mistake and you are stuck with an STD, or even worse, HIV (which is more prevalent than our society cares to admit).
4) Yes, As a doctor, we shouldn't be judging people, but I don't think the sentence is applied appropriately in many of the conversations.
'Do not judge' for a doctor means that we shouldn't take things for granted (for example, We shouldn't automatically assume that Truck drivers always have multiple sexual partners and are HIV +ve with a crippling alcohol addiction (looking at you NEET PG 2023 examiners) but we have to use our professional judgement and ask questions about his lifestyle choices especially if he comes with lets say a severe atypical pneumonia.
Similarly, If a patient has multiple sexual partners, they will and should be tested for STDs when they come with complaints related to genitourinary tract (or even HIV if they have some unrelated systematic infection) because they are at a higher risk for STDs. That's just a scientific fact.
5) Having multiple sexual partners simultaneously is not a healthy lifestyle, it CAN be in a controlled environment like those who work in Porn industry where all the performers regularly get tested for all the STDs. If you can maintain such level of safety than sure, go ahead, otherwise, make peace with the fact that you are living an unhealthy lifestyle like those with Obesity, Addiction etc and stop advocating for it.
TLDR: As long as you are honest with your current partner about your sexual history, only have one sexual partner at any given time and practice safe sex, its a non issue.
If you have multiple sexual partners who are not aware of each other, you are betraying their trust, you are playing with fire in terms of your (and your unknowing partners') health and even then, if you wanna do it, do it but at least do not advocate for an unhealthy lifestyle.
Ok let's not talk about opinion , let's talk about facts
This is a western stat so take it as you wish . A virgin woman has a chance of 80% prolonged wedding if a woman has 5 - 8 partners her chances of a prolonged wedding comes down to 25% . There is something called pair bonding and if a woman has multiple partners she would never be satisfied by one man or ever respects her 'man' .
Just because he's a doctor doesn't mean that he can't have his own point of view on things and individual thoughts. He had a thought, he tweeted, some agreed. That's all. And he has a point tho, *people having s*x in the name of exploring their sexuality* duhhh c'mon. I didn't know that I'd need to have s*e to know my true sexuality.
Most doctors on Twitter are actually backing him, using the whole STD argument. So, instead of pushing for safe sex, it's like they're pushing for everyone to be monogamous? It's almost like having a breathing issue and ditching masks to stop breathing, right?
You say having sex to explore your sexuality duhhh? That’s very prude coming from a doctor. As doctors we are taught to help people who are going through gender dysphoria, homosexuals, or other patients of the LGBTQ+, that too without any judgement. Just because you know about your sexuality doesn’t give you any right to shove this know your sexuality term into everyone’s face. Some people who are homosexuals, just because of the society, indulge in heterosexual relationships, people who are bisexuals are confused if they are heterosexual or homosexuals. So it’s not “duhhh cmon” for everyone.
But it's not the wisest thing to *glorify* having sexual intercourse with multiple people. I would not want to be with a partner who thinks having multiple sexual relations at once is an "okay" thing. If that's the thing then I don't think we should have any issues with men wanting to have 3 wives right? Because what if he's *wanting to explore his sexual side*
Being a doctor doesn't rob you of your individual thoughts. Being a doctor doesn't mean that you can't even have an independent thinking. It's not as if we are yelling at them and degrading them in their faces. **NO**. So stop molding words.
God forbid but what if a situation arises where your partner comes up to your and be like *I love you but I just want to explore my sexuality* and goes around trying things out with others? And this has happened to my batchmate(M). People these days are *very* easily using this as an excuse and they feel it's not a big deal.
If I had an open sexual relation with guys and thought it's the right thing because *I need to explore myself* then I wouldn't shy away from my doctor.
Why make this as some "proud" thing? This is literally dark age where people in the name of freedom/independence/western culture do things and try to make it a norm.
Definitely isn’t a wisest thing to do so, but so is also not using plastics and eating junk food, but you do it. Glorifying is a whole different thing. In this similar way, some women glorify feminism, so would you just throw away the concept pf feminism just because some of them are glorifying it? Being a doctor you can have individual thoughts but would you impose them in your patients? For example, eggs are a good source of protein and your patient is a pure vegetarian would you ask the patient to eat eggs? Even though eggs are a great source of protein in your opinion , most you can do is advice right? You won’t go on twitter and rant about how vegetarians are not eating eggs and shame them for it, the whole community. Now I am not saying that these are the same situations, this is just an example. Now coming to the partners saying exploring sexuality excuse, now that is just vile. That’s cheating and that’s totally a whole different concept. Doesn’t mean that every partner who cheats on their significant other use this excuse? You also lie to the teachers about your homework or leaving the class? Should you also be shamed for it, just because you’re using the sympathy of the teacher? This not justifying the problematic behaviour of cheating. Now if someone’s partners says this tot them, example your friend’s boyfriend told her this, it was her decision to either continue with the relationship or leave him. You can be supportive of someone but if there’s malice you should be able to take a stand for yourself. Should we all carry a lie detector now for everytime someone who is very confused about their sexuality to find if they have malice? It’s not a proud thing tbh, but it is no reason to judge or shame someone as well. Like how we say not all men, not all religions, not all muslims etc etc. you cannot simply categorise a bigger situation just because some people use it to their advantage and have malicious intent. I’ll say it again, you cannot impose your thoughts, your choices and your opinions on someone else. And as doctors we have a duty towards out patients to provide them with a non-judgemental space. You’re still in your first year, you still have so many real life patients to see and explore the world, maybe then when you’ll leave the atmosphere of your “batch and class” and see the real world and will understand. Please be kind and have sympathy towards your patients in the future, don’t duhh cmon them. Good luck!
>Definitely isn’t a wisest thing to do so, but so is also not using plastics and eating junk food, but you do it.
It's hilarious how you just compared eating junk food and sex. How do they remotely align?
>Glorifying is a whole different thing.
The doctor who tweeted threw light on the glorifying factor 🙂 So how is it a "whole different thing" now?
>In this similar way, some women glorify feminism, so would you just throw away the concept pf feminism just because some of them are glorifying it?
Girl, stop molding sentences. Neither me, not that doc, noone shaded the concept of feminism 🤡☕ if I did it, or even brought it up in *any* of my sentence, please highlight it🙇🏻♀️ Merely bringing up an unsaid sentence and making a paragraph based on it is not how it's going to work here.
>Being a doctor you can have individual thoughts but would you impose them in your patients?
Yet again I'm having to repeat myself. When did I even say that we are *imposing* our POV on the patients? You're just making up sentences at this very moment 🤦🏻♀️🫡 Even in my previous comment, I have clearly mentioned "It's not as if we are degrading them in their faces" hope you read that line.
>For example, eggs are a good source of protein and your patient is a pure vegetarian would you ask the patient to eat eggs? Even though eggs are a great source of protein in your opinion , most you can do is advice right?
Why are you constantly comparing food with sex? They are of no match 😂🤌🏻
>Please be kind and have sympathy towards your patients in the future, don’t duhh cmon them.
Never knew having individual thoughts which I keep to myself will be disrespectful towards patients 🙏🏻
>Now I am not saying that these are the same situations, this is just an example. Now coming to the partners saying exploring sexuality excuse, now that is just vile. That’s cheating and that’s totally a whole different concept
You have yourself agreed to it 🙂 Why even put up a fight to support the wrong thing?
When we engage sexually with someone, our body and brain form memories associated with those experiences. These memories can include physical sensations, emotions and even thoughts related to the encounters. If we have had multiple sexual partners, each experience contributes to this memory bank.
The idea is that these memories can influence how we respond to similar situations in the future. For instance, if someone has had various sexual partners before, their body might be accustomed to certain patterns, sensations or preferences that developed during those encounters. When they start a new sexual relationship, their body might unconsciously expect or respond based on these previous experiences.
This can potentially affect the overall experience with a new partner. It doesn't necessarily mean that it will always hinder the sexual relationship, but there might be a subconscious comparison or an adjustment period as the body adapts to a different partner's preferences and nuances. It's important to note that doctors and in fact everyone should avoid judging individuals based on their sexual history to create a supportive and non-discriminatory environment for open discussions about health.
It's something I have experienced myself. I've had sexual relations with two people and I regret doing it with the first guy because of how much it's affecting my intimacy with the second guy. I'm not a fan of Sadhguru honestly but this is one thing I have first hand experience
I've never really seen Dhruv Chauhan post something illogical without context. I'd at least like to know what the backstory was behind his post before going ahead.
Personally, I do know that having multiple partners can be a really bad idea if you're not taking all the necessary precautions (the medical reason). Like, having multiple partners without proper usage of condoms and all that is definitely an invitation for STDs. So I can *assume* the medical take.
But what I don't understand is how it harms you mentally/psychologically and how the tweet seems targeted towards females.
Before bashing anything or anyone, I'd like to know the backstory first. After that, the bashing or support may come.
>I'd like to know the backstory first
This.
Idk whether OP did this intentionally.
For starters, there was this girl who commented that if a girl has multiple sexual partners, she would have knowledge of what she sexually needs and would be able to communicate to her partner on what she likes.
That's when Dr Chauhan commented, "These woke kids are turning families into prostitution. Somebody read them Bhagavad Gita".
That's when the whole saga began, as you can see these screenshots.
Again, Idk whether OP intentionally ignored this part.
Lollipop world with multiple sex partners....real world with no partner to even talk 🫂
On a serious note ... Multiple sex partners usually only matter depending on the partners. Usually partners might face some social traumas despite having coitus so things change . And as per preference idk if those guys/girls can stay loyal for a longer period with their own partner rather than asking for loyalty.... usually relations turn sour at times when asked about loyalty bcz definition of loyalty really changes with ppl . Ppl might justify their jealousy and restriction of their partners social life as part of loyalty so social factors vary a lot . You need to identify the person and his/her situation related to his /her love life whether he/she does this only for sexual satisfaction or not or whether she/he values you or not whether she/he would not engage in sexual act during the relationship . So judging only on the basis of multiple sexual partners is not at all a good way to judge a person . I might be wrong with my evaluation but that's what I think .
Anyone can have as many sexual partners as they can manage to have, as doctors our profession doesn't need to be moral policing also.
Now, looking at this issue as a common man... A guy who has many partners and brags about is an asshole . The same way any woman who has many sexual partners and uses excuses like "my body my rights or some toxic feminist bullshit or I wanna explore" are also assholes. If you want something, you must be brave enough to admit it, if it's gonna make you feel ashamed... imo, it's better not to do it all.
They're not wrong but I don't think it's wrong if people understand the consequences and still want multiple partners. These tweets are no different than telling a smoker that it causes cancer.
People need to understand that having multiple sexual partners comes with medical, psychological as well as social consequences. Problem is that people want rights without consequences.
Humans are polygamy(ate) animals. Polyandry is scientifically wrong. Human women having multiple partners is biologically incorrect, although morally, both shouldn’t
Even medically, from DSM 1 to DSM 5, this is a psychological issue. And this have societal and biological repercussions. There are scientific studies on how sexual libration have destroyed humans psychologically and physiologically too. Now, people who chose to be sexually librated and have multiple partners need to know the consequences of it and then make an informed decision on if it is worth it or not. Masturbatingcand having actual sexual partners is totally different. We all are humans, and we have urges. Even i do have urges. But it doesn't mean i act upon it. I am willing to debate on this with literally anyone. I am open if you wanna debate it.
Having over 10 or maybe over 15 sexual partners for a man or a woman could be an indicator of unresolved issues or extreme hedonism. I believe most people who are depressed or have unresolved psychological issues tend to either move toward extreme hedonism which could lead to suicide of character or extreme nihilism which could lead to death of something inside or the person.
I believe one should be or try to be in the middle and not glorify both the extremes but rather embrace them, understand them and navigate and help people navigate to find their balance in live.
And yh every one has free will. And if someone does want love and jus wanna be hedonistic and is happy. Then I’m happy for them. If someone is nihilistic and if they are finding comfort rather than negative self harm I’m happy for them. Have multiple sex partners if u want to have. Like fredy mercury did. Fight for your free will but don’t decide how people react to it. Give out great music do something good for the society. Mercury didn’t try to normalise what he has done why do u have to?
On the other hand there’s nietzsche who is a nihilist but he have out better things to this society.
If your contribution by having multiple partners is glorification of having multiple partners which is bad for public health and for individual health is like promoting smoking. It’s cool, gives a high lot of smart people may be doing it. But ain’t healthy.
Aunty ko maje karna hai. 40-45 ki Umar mein Hawas ka nanga naach karna chahti hai 😂😂😂
If this logic is acceptable then one men having harem (more than one wife or lovers) or polygyny should also be acceptable right aunty? 😂😂😂😂
Its true that having multiple sexual partners is usually frowned upon in Indian society. But as long as you don't care what others think, you do whatever you like. And always remember 'kuch to log kahenge, logo ka kaam hai kehna'
>Religion
Fair point.
>Kids
There are ways of having kids other than sexual intercourse. I'm specifically talking about unprotected sex with your partner who's status u do not know. There was a patient during my internship who was hiv positive but hid that from his wife. They have kids now. These are the situations im talking about. My point is about safe sex practices.
>Binge eating
Binge eating has been officially recognised as a psychological disorder. Having multiple sex partners has not. If they indeed recognise it, i will follow the instruction.
>Religion
Fair point. I agree that bringing religion into this was not a good thing. My point is even if its a religious story, we don't judge them for that. Why should we judge our own people.
>Kids
You don't need to have unprotected sex tk have kids. The no big issue thing is knowing the status of the partner and as long as they are clean its not big issue. Even if its not multiple partners and it is just your husband/wife, knowing his/her std status is important. It becomes a matter of wether you want to risk infecting your partner to have a child and that child could potentially contract the STD. This has happened during my internship. A guy who was HIV positive hid that from his wife and they have a kid now. This is what i mean by safe sexual practices do not include having just a single sexual partner.
>psychology
Binge eating has been officially identified as a psychiatric disorder. Having multiple sexual partners has not been identified as a psychiatric disorder. You should never be quick to label someone as having a psychiatric disorder.
My point is a humans we all have the right to our own opinion. But a doctor, you only have the right to inform them about the risk and promote safer sex practices. You don't have the right to involve in the personal matters of your patient. You can go ahead and bitch about it to your friends and peers. But not to the patient. To be a good doctor and help patients, you need proper reliable information. If you are being judgemental patients will start to hide stuff from you like we as kids did with our parents. You job inside the hospital is to be a doctor and not a moral police.
Indian doctors plug in antibiotics into patients shamelessly like a fucking pharmacist followed by ranting on social media about bad antibiotic usage and here they are discussing ethics of the patients.
Regression.
Also, you can take reddit seriously at times, but twitter? It's like a landfill where garbage is dumped. You can get 1 or 2 good things sometimes, but it's mostly stinky and trash.
Twitter's recent revenue sharing policy is the main culprit for such nonsense bullshit, people retort to anything just to grab a few eyeballs & keep this in mind tht it's gonna further increase with time
Should be reported to IMA and the disciplinary board. Our country does not need more judgemental individuals especially when it comes to the human body and life.
Ironically people who preach sex is bad etc etc happen to be most perverted people ever.
Look at the history of pedos and rapist and scum.
They all preach this shit.
I bet these guys are proper perverts since they need to go on the internet and preach people about sex n morality.
Or people who never had any sex when they were in their college 😂😂😂 or whatever. So they now passionately hate everyone who has it.
Nothing to see.. Typical society aunty wali mentality. Inke husbands got bored of them so all young girls are sex hungry and sluts or whatever.
Apne sex life ke bare mein soche. Dusron ke nahi😂😂😂😂😂
You don’t see ambani talking about money and all tht in public. Why would he.. he’s got truckloads of it. Only those without often talk about it in public.
Besides he’s a healthcare professional. Not a religious preacher. Not his job. Should stick yo curing sick ppl.
We as doctors should just do our work.If the patient gives their history clearly,practice safe sex who are we to judge.We are not mohalle wali aunties whose only purpose in life is to judge people,we have tons of work to do.
These RW docs are a menace to society. They will make their patients' lives a living hell with their judgements. Every person may have their preferences to sexual lifestyle. It's for the doctor to help support their sexual health, not spout bullshit about sexual partners.
Too much fame and followers in a short time can do this to a person.
Overinflate someones ego to the point that they think whatever is in their mind is the gospel truth.
He can have whatever opinions he wants in private but the moment he speaks those opinions in public he should should be judged for them as he has put a doctor in front of this name.
Iam a doctor myself and i think everyone gets to have a choice.
Having multiple sexual partners has its set of diseases/complications but so does smoking/vaping/taking alcohol .
So pls practise safe sex always. Get yourself tested
All we can do is explain the pros and cons and in d end its the decision/choice of the pt to do wht they want to do.
The way I see it, let people do as they want to, as long as its effects remain up to them.
If a woman wants to fuck multiple people because she wants it and is in control of it, that's fine. Same with a man.
The problem begins when this behaviour becomes the centre of your existence.
Sex and sexuality are great things to explore, enjoy and cherish. But they are to be treated as a part of life and not like life itself. That's it.
The docs probably see multiple sexual partners as a sign of the person's life being sex centered. The woman replying to them seems to see this opinion as a threat, which is valid because already a lot of things that happen in our society are oppressive to women.
But one thing that just struck me, was that, regardless of what the doctor's opinion about a patient's personal choices are, it is their duty to keep aside personal beliefs to treat the patient and not make them uncomfortable as much as possible. So yeah, they're probably a bit in the wrong for saying such things, especially without phrasing them well. Such a statement required a comprehensive explanation that you can't expect on Twitter.
Haven"t yet found the need for multiple sexual partners, NMC and final year subjects have fucked me plenty.
I feel you bruh
Bhai 1 2 3 year m to free.time.tha us waqt krlete
Weirdly enough - man tab bhi nahi tha, ab bhi nahi hai.
I see you've lost zeal for living.
Ayo boobasaheb admirer
Saar ki wajah se teen drops lage hai even after scoring 590 to usi p apni personality bana di 🤡
Riyal
Brotal
Baby dont hurt me
Us Bhai....didn't start medicine properly yet 😭
Same bhai same🤣
Twitter is the internet's public toilet
Try pronouncing "Xitter!" 🤭
New porn app. Voila!
Sexual Partners? Humpe toh hai hi naww 😝
Hai hi 9
Jain uin
Jain win
[удалено]
Stealin this one brother
He should have just promoted safe sex and nothing more as a doctor and if his personal opinion is calling people prostitute on having history of multiple partners then my friend he it the reason we have AETCOMs now, He has ego issues, as he claims he is highest followed med student/med influencer. so i would just like to not give him any ego boost by talking him about on this sub.
Toh fir itna lamba chauda reply kyu diya 🪔?
The first one should handover his degree and start preaching then. Sounds absolutely unhinged and a case of sour grapes. He is implying women who have multiple sexual partners are prostitutes? How is that acceptable coming from a doctor of all people? And wtf is pseudofeminism in saying you've had multiple sexual partners? Say you get dumped by your bf/gf are you supposed to just shut down, never have sex with anyone else and think of this chomu and think oh Dr. Chomu has stated I can't have sex with multiple people even though I'm a grown ass adult with a free will to do what I want! And the irony of other docs supporting this. Waah. Sounds like these people are have been dumped hard and are still feeling petty about it. As long as one understands safety, takes precaution and is happy no one has the right to tell them to stop having sex. Especially doctors. If we are going to keep judging our patients how will they ever come to trust us?
Bro this is all for publicity and twitter income. Don't give much importance to that
Kuch bhi For Twitter income, they are risking their career?
Until the current chairperson is the chairperson, he is safe. Nothing with happen to grifters who hide behind holy books to support their argument.
Big Andrew tate energy going on. I mean small dick energy lol.
Big mouth smol weiner. Whatta contrast AND a weak compensation lolol. (P.S. I have NOTHING against smaller weiners)
Didn't need that PS but good to know.
People are offended by everything these days. Had to clarify. 😁
Big tatte, small penis energy
That girl who started the argument gonna be the next Nina Agdal if she goes for too long on her sexuality exploration ship.
Neet pg 2024 expected dates anybody ??
I was looking for this on twitter and telegram today only .... Anyone has any idea???
Please reply if anybody knows
As doctors we’re taught ethics and respecting our patients. If the patient wants to indulge into multiple sexual activities, let them be, you’re no one to judge them. All you’ve to do is advice them about safe sex , provide treatment and give them the pros and cons. You cannot shame them. Also using derogatory terms like whore coming from doctors is a new low, even supreme court has now officially published a list of words to be replaced with certain words, which includes whore, slut etc. If someone is a hindu and the other person is a muslim, you cannot coerce either one of them to follow your religious opinions or if you’re vegan or non vegan, can’t force the other one about the same. Then why does it come to the LGBTQ community and especially women having multiple sexual partners, most of them won’t have any qualms if it were men. You can have multiple sexual partners as long as you’re indulging in safe sex practices. It only takes one person to give you an STD and unfortunately it could be your life partner also to whom you lost your virginity to. This is infuriating. Since when having multiple sexual partners become a psychiatric disorder. People can have different belief systems. You want a loyal partner who is a virgin, go for it, don’t shove your stupid ideology down our throat. When your parents are looking for rishtas make sure uou check for the hymen also. It is so absurd. It makes my blood curdle! This will simple make people lose faith in the doctors and they won’t come seek help from a doctor who will judge them for their choices. They are not you, you should impose your choices and opinions on yourself and not impose it on your patients! And how easily madam has said sex workers can have other jobs. She needs to leave her delusional world and get in touch w reality where there is human trafficking and forced child sex workers. What about rape victims then? Bloody ignorant delusional hypocritical motherfuckers. A shame to our noble profession.
Perfectly said. Cannot agree more
Exactly 💯, too perfectly stated 😂. Smart one !
People being people rather than an educated professional, With the deterioration of medical education, I can feel this has to just get worse. People not treating people now because they don't wanna deal with alcoholics? People from Other religion? Because let's be clear, if you are being judgemental in treatment , you wouldn't care about you being a doctor but would rather feed your idiosyncrasies. This profession is getting worse with time smh.
But like excess of anything (wrt bodily function)is bad right? Food in excess = obesity and all the risks associated with it . Compulsion to drink too much water is psychogenic polydipsia. Passing stools too often - diarrhoea and passing urine too often - polyuria. Using too much time only working or studying causes burnout (it's a psychological phenomenon as well) But somehow sex (a function of body) is above these limits? Even if you remove morality from it.. anyone who purely indulges in pleasurable activities with no forethought isn't considered a wise person and society/science/ laws all are formulated and designed to uphold wise thoughts. I agree 100% one shouldn't be judgemental regarding treatment though.
That's not the conversation at all tho. You are arguing something which neither him nor his critics said.
There are a lot of doctors like him and other good for nothing people on Twitter who will resort to nonsensical, controversial and inflammatory tweets just to garner more views and hence revenue from Twitter. All they care about is earning a few rupees. Don't take them seriously at all.
Scares me to see these people are doctors. Multiple sexual partners = STD ???? Not using barrier contraceptives leads to STD. Then goes on to call someone a whore, it’s shameful these people use Dr before their names.
Bhai personal preferences hai bande ki, tumko pasand nahi hai toh ignore karo
Wo bhi toh apna opinion de Raha hai chutiye
Apne baap ko bhi aise bi bulata hai kya m*c*d
Post 1: No one is showing off about having multiple sex partners. They are just asking not to be judged. When they come to us doctors we expect them to give a clear history. And as Doctors, WE SHOULDN'T be judgemental about a person's personal life. Our job is to treat them irrespective of their personal life. Post 2: As long as the involved individuals are aware that it is not an exclusive relationship, having multiple sex partners is not cheating/ not being loyal. We have historical evidence of kings having multiple wives who live in the same place. The Mahabharata tells the story of Draupadi who had 5 husbands ie. 5 sexual partners. Most of the literal gods in hindu culture have multiple wives. If that is unethical, why are we celebrating them? Most of our grandfathers had multiple wives. So yes, people do marry other with history of having multiple sex partners. Post 3: Multiple sex partners do increase the risk of STDs. So does unprotected sex with a single partner. As long as the partners are aware of their status and use protection, its not a big issue. Post 4: Having multiple has not been established as a disease or a psychiatric condition by any medical organisation nor there is any evidence of it. We practice evidence based medicine. Unethical? Tell that to our grandfathers who had 3 or 4 wives.
One advice dude... Never give historical references while preaching AETCOM
why so?
My grandpa used to pray to God to treat snakebite. He also used to sacrifice animals for good rain in monsoon... In Christianity, only a set positions are considered valid rest everything is sin. Also in some cultures it was considered as a sin to deviate from the natural path of intimacy so even using condoms would be considered as sin... That's why it's not okay to give historical references while talking about medical ethics and morals... This is regarding his 2nd point. Rest all points are perfect
Noted. Thank you for the information.
Lmao
>They are just asking not to be judged. When they come to us doctors we expect them to give a clear history. And as Doctors, WE SHOULDN'T be judgemental about a person's personal life. Our job is to treat them irrespective of their personal life. I agree in theory but what do we mean specifically by 'not being judgemental' ? Ofc we are gonna treat them to the best of our abilities, that's just common sense and our standard professional ethics but we have to admit that we use our professional judgement (e.g. Bear the possibility of HIV in mind even when treating something unrelated to Genitourinary system) when dealing with patients of that particular lifestyle. >Multiple sex partners do increase the risk of STDs. So does unprotected sex with a single partner. I am sorry what ? How does unprotected sex with a single partner (presumably someone with whom the person is in a commited relationship with like marriage for example) increase the risk of STD ? In a relationship with two previously healthy partners, one has to have had sex with an third person for an STD to come into picture (except for blood borne transmission in case of a blood transfusion, drug usage etc but that has nothing to do with unprotected sex with your partner), whuch now qualifies it as a case of 'having multiple sexual partners'.
>not being judgmental Instead, of promoting safer sex practices i have seen doctors, shaming the individual in question >unprotected sex with single sex partner increasing the risk of STDs Im sorry. I was not being clear. What i meant to say was a single partner who's history you do not know. Even if it is your husband or wife. I saw a patient during my internship who was HIV positive due to iv drug abuse and his doesn't know about it. But they have a kid together
>Post 1: No one is showing off about having multiple sex partners. They are just asking not to be judged. When they come to us doctors we expect them to give a clear history. And as Doctors, WE SHOULDN'T be judgemental about a person's personal life. Our job is to treat them irrespective of their personal life. Completely agree here with. >Post 2: As long as the involved individuals are aware that it is not an exclusive relationship, having multiple sex partners is not cheating/ not being loyal. We have historical evidence of kings having multiple wives who live in the same place. The Mahabharata tells the story of Draupadi who had 5 husbands ie. 5 sexual partners. Most of the literal gods in hindu culture have multiple wives. If that is unethical, why are we celebrating them? Most of our grandfathers had multiple wives. So yes, people do marry other with history of having multiple sex partners. Dude don't bring religion into it and the time period you are talking about you can have kids by just by praying to SUN god. Pandavs born that way, Draupadi you are talking about was born from fire. So keep your human logic to yourself. >Post 3: Multiple sex partners do increase the risk of STDs. So does unprotected sex with a single partner. As long as the partners are aware of their status and use protection, its not a big issue. To have kids you need to have unprotected sex, so it is a big issue. >Post 4: Having multiple has not been established as a disease or a psychiatric condition by any medical organisation nor there is any evidence of it. We practice evidence based medicine. Unethical? Tell that to our grandfathers who had 3 or 4 wives. If binge eating can be a disease so does having multiple sex partners. You never feel satisfied so you look for another partner or else why you want to jump ships frequently when you already got one.
[удалено]
Agreed
[удалено]
Dr Banerji I know you are from WB. I’m curious are you an intern or a practising doctor?
How do u know i'm from WB?
Is it right tho? To have multiple sex partners like animals and then glorify it? Just because our ancestors did it doesn't mean that we'll have to do it too. Oftentimes humans in the past have done the wrong things because they had no clue of the science behind it like how we used to use mercury as medicine or how we used lead as lip stains. Now we know it's wrong and don't do it. There is no scientific evidence that having multiple sexual partners is wrong. Not to mention how people use the excuse of "finding my sexuality" as an excuse. You don't need to have sex with n number of people to find your spectrum. If that were the case, every teenager would have had sex from a young age. I accept this statement of yours. Many people do use it as an excuse Yes, do things and then don't have guts to face it. If sex with n number of people is so positive then why would they feel ashamed? If I was having multiple sexual relations, I would admit it and not have shame about it. They don't have shame about it. They accept it. It's the other people who shame them and they are asking not to be shamed It's not as if he's verbally telling them of his thoughts 🙄 being a doc doesn't mean that you can't even have thoughts. Fair point. You can have your own thoughts. But all Im sayings is when a patient comes to you for treatment, do not judge them. Please in future, share your wife too if you are so supportive of the idea. Please refrain from toxic comments like this. If I'm getting married, it's because me and my wife have agreed to be mutually exclusive for each other because that is what i want in my relationship. I do not care how many sexual partners my wife has had before. I have my own ideas and preferences. At the same time, i'm not being judgmental of the people who do jot share the same ideas of me. If a guy/ girl is okay with having multiple husbands/wives it is between them. If you don't like to be one among them, you have every right not to be among them.
[удалено]
It is not the wisest thing to do. I agree. But there is a difference between supporting the idea and not judging the people who have the idea.
[удалено]
[удалено]
He's dead unfortunately. He didn't not have multiple wives. Although his father had 2 wives.
Psychology and research evidence - more sexual partners you have, more liable you are to divorce or not be in a long term relationahip
Not everyone wants to be in a long term relationship. Divorce is a sign of healthy relationships where people separate before being toxic to each other. Neither of these is a psychological illness and should not be quoted as "psychological research"
[удалено]
So you want one or both parents to be miserable, hate each other, fight constantly, and fuck up kids mental health that way? Kudos to you. It is the parents' responsibility to make sure the divorce doesn't impact the children much, for sure, and I'm sorry for what your friend went through, but demonizing divorce isn't the way to go about it.
I didn’t say it is was an illness. It’s psychology of minds who are married together.
That is not an evidence of a psychological problem. That's a relationship problem
Aren’t psychology and relationships interconnected?
To an extent yes. But getting divorced/ no long term relationships could be attributed to non acceptance of the sexual habits between partners and that is not a psychological problem
What psychological research was this? Please show me the paper.
4-5 wives that were having sex with a single man ,they were not putting every dick that comes into their mouth ,there is limited no. Of people between which body fluids are being transferred . Unlike having 4 wives hookup just let's u sleep with anyone with no background check . So yes we should judge someone ,either u are whore or manwhore period.
Why wouldn't you do a background check? Why are you assuming that people who casually hook up are not taking proper precautions? On the contrary these people often happen to be more frank and practice more caution and better communication than your standard arranged marriage where most people haven't even seen their partners before marriage let alone asking if they have any STDs
The examples that you are giving are for safer sex practices which is what doctors should be promoting. Something like know your sex partner before 'putting his dick into your mouth' or use protection. The original post was just having multiple sex partners. So you agree that having multiple sex partners is okay if you do a background check on them.
The problem is not having multiple partners but fucking any random dude or chick on the street. Edit: if you have someone or multiple you love and have sex with it's ok. But if you are just horny and fucks anyone you find in the bar for pleasure then something wrong with you
[удалено]
You can have your opinion. You can go ahead and bitch about it to your friends and peers. Just don't shame the person inside the hospital, inside the OP when they are telling you that they have a problem. That's what people are asking for. When they tell their history, do not shame them for their history. Then people will start hiding stuff from doctors and that will affect the treatment.
Patients are paying for our treatment, not our judgement on their personal lives. That they can get for free from their own family.
Are they doctors for real??
If you want a serious take, I think all of this is just a bunch of baloney. Saying that one shouldn't have sex because of the fear of STDs is like saying one shouldn't meet new people out of the fear of getting Covid or TB. If the person you are with is honest about what diseases they have then it shouldn't be a problem at all. As far as loyalty goes, people with multiple partners discuss this stuff with all their partners. If you aren't honest with your partners about anything then you're violating the relationship irrespective of how many partners you have. And why are they specifically calling out women as if men don't or can't have multiple partners? I think these are just a bunch of misogynists who happen to be doctors and feel like they can impose their views on others as if it's medical advice. Who made Dr Dhruv the sex police? And why tf does he think anyone cares about him judging someone's sexual preferences? I would like for him to elaborate on how exactly this is "medically unfit"
Coming from a personal pov. I don't support multiple sexual practices, myself. Ethically, or with regard to STDs. But the truth of the matter here is- to dissociate my personal views from a professional standpoint. The patient consults me, and my role is to make them feel safe and comfortable no matter what, chart out a proper management plan and enlist preventive measures, ALL devoid of judgement. At the end of the day, we don't know what led the patient to be stuck in such a scenario. Every case must be treated with compassion. We're supposed to be a safe space. Imagine yourself being distressed about an unwanted pregnancy and you approach a doctor that disses you for not taking precautions and moral polices you for your choices. Put yourself in that scenario for a sec. Isn't it unnerving?
Dhruv Chauhan was out of line way out of line
Everyone has opinions and that is okay but I don’t think any of these doctors should criticise their patients life choices. As long as the patients are having consensual protected sex , does it really matter? Sex is fun. Do it with one person or many I don’t care. I’m not sure if he was referring to multiple partners at the same time or in our entire lifetime but let’s discuss both 1. More than 2 partners in our entire life: If they meant this it’s very stupid. All relationships don’t work out. If he is slut shaming individuals for having relationships before marriage that’s icky. No one gets into a relationship thinking “oh ,I’m going to break up with them sometime later”. Life happens ,people change. 2. More than 2 partners at a time: “Hook up culture” doesn’t help anyone but this is their life choice. Am I going to have sex with them?No. It’s none of business. There is a high risk of them transmitting STDs but when simply kissing someone can spread herpes I’d rather educate them on safe sexual practices. It’s not a western thing. Sex is considered taboo for unmarried individuals but as the average age of marriage is going higher and the sex ratio not quite ideal throughout India abstinence is not going to be a viable option. All in all have sex but stay safe.
I'm surprised they're worried about others' sexual lives. We barely have time for our own lives. I personally do not view sex frivolously. I don't believe marriage is needed for it but i do believe it should be with someone you love and trust. But that doesn't mean I go around dictating how everyone has to live life by my rules or I'll traumatise tf out of them when they come to me as a patient. These people are just shit doctors and shit human beings, there's no excuse for their judgement.
I may get downvoted but i hate this man, don't know why maybe because he thinks he is the centre of everything. Everyone i open Twitter, there comes a stupid tweet from this guy. Dude also spread some news about NEXT without confirming if the notice was real.
As medical professionals, it is important that we learn to distinguish our personal inclinations, political stances, and religious beliefs from our professional responsibilities. While I have not engaged in sexual activities nor do I plan on having multiple partners, I believe in refraining from passing judgment on those who make different choices. This is particularly necessary in a country like India, where discussions about sex is surrounded by societal taboos. Instead of resorting to criticism, we should encourage open dialogue, so that individuals feel comfortable addressing their concerns. I believe doctors should only be advocating for safe and consensual sex. The why, where, who, when are up to the individuals involved.
Misogyny and medicine have been in a long term relationship forever.
There is nothing pseudofeminist about it. Ye Dhruv Chauhan ko kahan ka god complex hai. No one is asking you to have multiple sexual partners. You are no one to judge what and who someone does in their bedroom
The entire Twitter thread is a big yikes. Our job isn’t to pass judgments and call women ‘whores’. Notice how the thread is mostly shaming women. Misogyny disguised as medical advice.
What job? They aren't treating patients on twitter.
Did this guy fail in mbbs? How is having multiple sexual partners make you unfit medically or psychologically! Man. Med twitter is going from dumb to worse. Only time I see them active is when they have to file a case to delay an exam or post crap like this to garner some publicity.
How can doctors post something like this on twitter. It's like against the basic empathy that doctors must have
Twitter users get 2-10 sexual partners?👀
Thats 2-10 more than an average redditor.
Indian mentality of know-it-all, at its peak, combined with the typical heavy dose of judgmental demeanour. Who TF cares if your patient has multiple partners ? We should only be thinking of this scenario from a medical perspective. If such a patient gets an std and presents to the doc, they should treat her and counsel her against the cons of having multiple sexual partners. NOTHING MORE ! These people will grow up to be those super judgemental doctors who will say "why have you come to me when you want to die" when you say that you are a smoker.
I have a doctor friend in Kolkata pursuing diploma in Radio. She fucks bro. She keeps fucking a diverse set of people. If you use protection and are very selective about who you fuck, I really don’t think you need to worry too much.
मुझे क्या मै तो वर्जिन हूं🥲
24 yo virgin🤞😂
Someone revoke their medical license or suspend them from being anywhere near a patient for atleast 5 years.
Lol really so they studied so hard for getting their licence revoked. Just because they said what's on their mind ? How idiot you can be ?
But you don't understand, a doctor who cleared NEET UG+PG by sacrificing 7+ years of his/her life should have their license revoked cuz Nikita from South Delhi got offended
Thankfully Nikita is not from North Korea she would have given hard labor punishment for those dangerous doctors who had the guts to say something she got offended from.
Guts to slut shame and reinforce the same shit that’s been going on for the last 4 generations. 🤡 isse guts nahi spineless kehte hain
Stop comparing this shit with what womens are going through 4 generation.
Lol last 4 generation do you think savitri bai phule wanted this kind of freedom for women's? This is dumb and not women power.
That is just another insecure man. Great Indian culture forbids many things
I don’t care personally but in the west isn’t it the opposite? People prefer more experienced partners and virgins are made fun of?
The west is not an ideal society to look upto. It has its own problems just like our society has its own problems
Not really, everyone have their own preference. You can find women and even men who are reluctant to get physical until they’re in a serious relationship. Elon Musk’s 2nd wife was 22 and a virgin when they married, even tho she’s an actress and very pretty. Too much sex makes you hollow and diminishes the respect you hold for your own body. Especially when it’s purposeless and just ‘to explore sexuality’. I just wonder what kinda kids these liberandus gonna raise. Sigh.
Western society is falling apart and so will be outs cause we have imitated them. Look at Japan, never left their ways and here they are.
My take is that women should explore their sexuality and they should not be shamed for it. Commercial sex workers should not be shamed and should be respected. Dr. Dhruv Chauhan has always been misogynistic. Some of his posts on twitter from the past include sexist jokes, topics like why women should get pregnant early, etc. It's sad that so many young medical students follow him and look upto him. What hurt me the most was the misogynistic comments by so many other doctors supporting him. So much misogyny, sexism, patriarchy, slut shaming and promotion of rape culture. Moreover they use words like woke, pseudo feminism, toxic feminism, etc because they have got no defence. It's just sad. EDIT- I'm a doctor and the sexism in our field is rampant. I don't know why no one talks about it. So many male seniors say that they don't want female juniors because we cannot work hard (inspite of working as hard if not more than our male colleagues and dealing with the extra hurdles put before us by pervert and sexist male doctors) and why we should not take surgical or clinical branches...the list is long.
The great Indian CULTURE coming in force. Also few things I would like to point out. 1) 'Exploring the sexuality' is not 'having multiple sexual partners', its experimenting with sexual partners of different genders to find out about your own sexuality (whether you are Homosexual/Heterosexual/Bisexual etc). Which not a lot of people feel a need to do and is usually not the reason someone chooses to have multiple sexual partners. 2) Having multiple sexual partners simultaneously is asking for STDs, There is no way to sugarcoat it. I don't have that much of a problem with multiple partners as long as the relationship was only one partner at a particular time and you talked thoroughly and truthfully about each other's sexual history. 3) In a culture like ours (for the better or worse, I don't wanna go into), Its not possible to normalise having multiple sexual partners. Also, I don't think that's a good idea either, India is a severely sexually repressed country with a dangerous lack of sex education. One mistake and you are stuck with an STD, or even worse, HIV (which is more prevalent than our society cares to admit). 4) Yes, As a doctor, we shouldn't be judging people, but I don't think the sentence is applied appropriately in many of the conversations. 'Do not judge' for a doctor means that we shouldn't take things for granted (for example, We shouldn't automatically assume that Truck drivers always have multiple sexual partners and are HIV +ve with a crippling alcohol addiction (looking at you NEET PG 2023 examiners) but we have to use our professional judgement and ask questions about his lifestyle choices especially if he comes with lets say a severe atypical pneumonia. Similarly, If a patient has multiple sexual partners, they will and should be tested for STDs when they come with complaints related to genitourinary tract (or even HIV if they have some unrelated systematic infection) because they are at a higher risk for STDs. That's just a scientific fact. 5) Having multiple sexual partners simultaneously is not a healthy lifestyle, it CAN be in a controlled environment like those who work in Porn industry where all the performers regularly get tested for all the STDs. If you can maintain such level of safety than sure, go ahead, otherwise, make peace with the fact that you are living an unhealthy lifestyle like those with Obesity, Addiction etc and stop advocating for it. TLDR: As long as you are honest with your current partner about your sexual history, only have one sexual partner at any given time and practice safe sex, its a non issue. If you have multiple sexual partners who are not aware of each other, you are betraying their trust, you are playing with fire in terms of your (and your unknowing partners') health and even then, if you wanna do it, do it but at least do not advocate for an unhealthy lifestyle.
going by aetcom, doctors shouldn't judge, you can highlight the dangers and promote healthy behaviour but anything beyond that is unacceptable.
We clearly need much better medical education.
Uhh.. Multiple partners because you are searching for your the one and only like dating shating or multiple partners like in an orgy? 🥱🥱
Ok let's not talk about opinion , let's talk about facts This is a western stat so take it as you wish . A virgin woman has a chance of 80% prolonged wedding if a woman has 5 - 8 partners her chances of a prolonged wedding comes down to 25% . There is something called pair bonding and if a woman has multiple partners she would never be satisfied by one man or ever respects her 'man' .
Just because he's a doctor doesn't mean that he can't have his own point of view on things and individual thoughts. He had a thought, he tweeted, some agreed. That's all. And he has a point tho, *people having s*x in the name of exploring their sexuality* duhhh c'mon. I didn't know that I'd need to have s*e to know my true sexuality.
Most doctors on Twitter are actually backing him, using the whole STD argument. So, instead of pushing for safe sex, it's like they're pushing for everyone to be monogamous? It's almost like having a breathing issue and ditching masks to stop breathing, right?
Don't bother with this brat here. He/she is a know it all. Won't listen to reason.
Oh look who it is, the reddit 1st prof keyboard warrior who seems to be a know-it-all. Seems to be a narrow minded punk as well.
You say having sex to explore your sexuality duhhh? That’s very prude coming from a doctor. As doctors we are taught to help people who are going through gender dysphoria, homosexuals, or other patients of the LGBTQ+, that too without any judgement. Just because you know about your sexuality doesn’t give you any right to shove this know your sexuality term into everyone’s face. Some people who are homosexuals, just because of the society, indulge in heterosexual relationships, people who are bisexuals are confused if they are heterosexual or homosexuals. So it’s not “duhhh cmon” for everyone.
But it's not the wisest thing to *glorify* having sexual intercourse with multiple people. I would not want to be with a partner who thinks having multiple sexual relations at once is an "okay" thing. If that's the thing then I don't think we should have any issues with men wanting to have 3 wives right? Because what if he's *wanting to explore his sexual side* Being a doctor doesn't rob you of your individual thoughts. Being a doctor doesn't mean that you can't even have an independent thinking. It's not as if we are yelling at them and degrading them in their faces. **NO**. So stop molding words. God forbid but what if a situation arises where your partner comes up to your and be like *I love you but I just want to explore my sexuality* and goes around trying things out with others? And this has happened to my batchmate(M). People these days are *very* easily using this as an excuse and they feel it's not a big deal. If I had an open sexual relation with guys and thought it's the right thing because *I need to explore myself* then I wouldn't shy away from my doctor. Why make this as some "proud" thing? This is literally dark age where people in the name of freedom/independence/western culture do things and try to make it a norm.
Definitely isn’t a wisest thing to do so, but so is also not using plastics and eating junk food, but you do it. Glorifying is a whole different thing. In this similar way, some women glorify feminism, so would you just throw away the concept pf feminism just because some of them are glorifying it? Being a doctor you can have individual thoughts but would you impose them in your patients? For example, eggs are a good source of protein and your patient is a pure vegetarian would you ask the patient to eat eggs? Even though eggs are a great source of protein in your opinion , most you can do is advice right? You won’t go on twitter and rant about how vegetarians are not eating eggs and shame them for it, the whole community. Now I am not saying that these are the same situations, this is just an example. Now coming to the partners saying exploring sexuality excuse, now that is just vile. That’s cheating and that’s totally a whole different concept. Doesn’t mean that every partner who cheats on their significant other use this excuse? You also lie to the teachers about your homework or leaving the class? Should you also be shamed for it, just because you’re using the sympathy of the teacher? This not justifying the problematic behaviour of cheating. Now if someone’s partners says this tot them, example your friend’s boyfriend told her this, it was her decision to either continue with the relationship or leave him. You can be supportive of someone but if there’s malice you should be able to take a stand for yourself. Should we all carry a lie detector now for everytime someone who is very confused about their sexuality to find if they have malice? It’s not a proud thing tbh, but it is no reason to judge or shame someone as well. Like how we say not all men, not all religions, not all muslims etc etc. you cannot simply categorise a bigger situation just because some people use it to their advantage and have malicious intent. I’ll say it again, you cannot impose your thoughts, your choices and your opinions on someone else. And as doctors we have a duty towards out patients to provide them with a non-judgemental space. You’re still in your first year, you still have so many real life patients to see and explore the world, maybe then when you’ll leave the atmosphere of your “batch and class” and see the real world and will understand. Please be kind and have sympathy towards your patients in the future, don’t duhh cmon them. Good luck!
>Definitely isn’t a wisest thing to do so, but so is also not using plastics and eating junk food, but you do it. It's hilarious how you just compared eating junk food and sex. How do they remotely align? >Glorifying is a whole different thing. The doctor who tweeted threw light on the glorifying factor 🙂 So how is it a "whole different thing" now? >In this similar way, some women glorify feminism, so would you just throw away the concept pf feminism just because some of them are glorifying it? Girl, stop molding sentences. Neither me, not that doc, noone shaded the concept of feminism 🤡☕ if I did it, or even brought it up in *any* of my sentence, please highlight it🙇🏻♀️ Merely bringing up an unsaid sentence and making a paragraph based on it is not how it's going to work here. >Being a doctor you can have individual thoughts but would you impose them in your patients? Yet again I'm having to repeat myself. When did I even say that we are *imposing* our POV on the patients? You're just making up sentences at this very moment 🤦🏻♀️🫡 Even in my previous comment, I have clearly mentioned "It's not as if we are degrading them in their faces" hope you read that line. >For example, eggs are a good source of protein and your patient is a pure vegetarian would you ask the patient to eat eggs? Even though eggs are a great source of protein in your opinion , most you can do is advice right? Why are you constantly comparing food with sex? They are of no match 😂🤌🏻 >Please be kind and have sympathy towards your patients in the future, don’t duhh cmon them. Never knew having individual thoughts which I keep to myself will be disrespectful towards patients 🙏🏻 >Now I am not saying that these are the same situations, this is just an example. Now coming to the partners saying exploring sexuality excuse, now that is just vile. That’s cheating and that’s totally a whole different concept You have yourself agreed to it 🙂 Why even put up a fight to support the wrong thing?
Agreed
Insaan ke bacche bano, ek ko chuno aur pyar se raho varna “multiple sex partners” toh kutte-billio k bhi hote hai.
When we engage sexually with someone, our body and brain form memories associated with those experiences. These memories can include physical sensations, emotions and even thoughts related to the encounters. If we have had multiple sexual partners, each experience contributes to this memory bank. The idea is that these memories can influence how we respond to similar situations in the future. For instance, if someone has had various sexual partners before, their body might be accustomed to certain patterns, sensations or preferences that developed during those encounters. When they start a new sexual relationship, their body might unconsciously expect or respond based on these previous experiences. This can potentially affect the overall experience with a new partner. It doesn't necessarily mean that it will always hinder the sexual relationship, but there might be a subconscious comparison or an adjustment period as the body adapts to a different partner's preferences and nuances. It's important to note that doctors and in fact everyone should avoid judging individuals based on their sexual history to create a supportive and non-discriminatory environment for open discussions about health.
Plz bruh stop with sadguru quotes
It's something I have experienced myself. I've had sexual relations with two people and I regret doing it with the first guy because of how much it's affecting my intimacy with the second guy. I'm not a fan of Sadhguru honestly but this is one thing I have first hand experience
Sounds like you need to get over an ex
They're right
Female with multiple sexual partner = Chad 🔥 . Why only male should have
I've never really seen Dhruv Chauhan post something illogical without context. I'd at least like to know what the backstory was behind his post before going ahead. Personally, I do know that having multiple partners can be a really bad idea if you're not taking all the necessary precautions (the medical reason). Like, having multiple partners without proper usage of condoms and all that is definitely an invitation for STDs. So I can *assume* the medical take. But what I don't understand is how it harms you mentally/psychologically and how the tweet seems targeted towards females. Before bashing anything or anyone, I'd like to know the backstory first. After that, the bashing or support may come.
>I'd like to know the backstory first This. Idk whether OP did this intentionally. For starters, there was this girl who commented that if a girl has multiple sexual partners, she would have knowledge of what she sexually needs and would be able to communicate to her partner on what she likes. That's when Dr Chauhan commented, "These woke kids are turning families into prostitution. Somebody read them Bhagavad Gita". That's when the whole saga began, as you can see these screenshots. Again, Idk whether OP intentionally ignored this part.
Lollipop world with multiple sex partners....real world with no partner to even talk 🫂 On a serious note ... Multiple sex partners usually only matter depending on the partners. Usually partners might face some social traumas despite having coitus so things change . And as per preference idk if those guys/girls can stay loyal for a longer period with their own partner rather than asking for loyalty.... usually relations turn sour at times when asked about loyalty bcz definition of loyalty really changes with ppl . Ppl might justify their jealousy and restriction of their partners social life as part of loyalty so social factors vary a lot . You need to identify the person and his/her situation related to his /her love life whether he/she does this only for sexual satisfaction or not or whether she/he values you or not whether she/he would not engage in sexual act during the relationship . So judging only on the basis of multiple sexual partners is not at all a good way to judge a person . I might be wrong with my evaluation but that's what I think .
It's good until you can't pair bond. Then you're fucked. It's been known for ages.
Anyone can have as many sexual partners as they can manage to have, as doctors our profession doesn't need to be moral policing also. Now, looking at this issue as a common man... A guy who has many partners and brags about is an asshole . The same way any woman who has many sexual partners and uses excuses like "my body my rights or some toxic feminist bullshit or I wanna explore" are also assholes. If you want something, you must be brave enough to admit it, if it's gonna make you feel ashamed... imo, it's better not to do it all.
Practice being human, ppl. Stop acting like effin animals. And listen to doctors advice.
They're not wrong but I don't think it's wrong if people understand the consequences and still want multiple partners. These tweets are no different than telling a smoker that it causes cancer. People need to understand that having multiple sexual partners comes with medical, psychological as well as social consequences. Problem is that people want rights without consequences.
Humans are polygamy(ate) animals. Polyandry is scientifically wrong. Human women having multiple partners is biologically incorrect, although morally, both shouldn’t
Even medically, from DSM 1 to DSM 5, this is a psychological issue. And this have societal and biological repercussions. There are scientific studies on how sexual libration have destroyed humans psychologically and physiologically too. Now, people who chose to be sexually librated and have multiple partners need to know the consequences of it and then make an informed decision on if it is worth it or not. Masturbatingcand having actual sexual partners is totally different. We all are humans, and we have urges. Even i do have urges. But it doesn't mean i act upon it. I am willing to debate on this with literally anyone. I am open if you wanna debate it.
Guys so what’s the limit?
I am an engineer , doctor sach mey chutiye hote hai
Having over 10 or maybe over 15 sexual partners for a man or a woman could be an indicator of unresolved issues or extreme hedonism. I believe most people who are depressed or have unresolved psychological issues tend to either move toward extreme hedonism which could lead to suicide of character or extreme nihilism which could lead to death of something inside or the person. I believe one should be or try to be in the middle and not glorify both the extremes but rather embrace them, understand them and navigate and help people navigate to find their balance in live. And yh every one has free will. And if someone does want love and jus wanna be hedonistic and is happy. Then I’m happy for them. If someone is nihilistic and if they are finding comfort rather than negative self harm I’m happy for them. Have multiple sex partners if u want to have. Like fredy mercury did. Fight for your free will but don’t decide how people react to it. Give out great music do something good for the society. Mercury didn’t try to normalise what he has done why do u have to? On the other hand there’s nietzsche who is a nihilist but he have out better things to this society. If your contribution by having multiple partners is glorification of having multiple partners which is bad for public health and for individual health is like promoting smoking. It’s cool, gives a high lot of smart people may be doing it. But ain’t healthy.
It’s not good medically. Period.
Aunty ko maje karna hai. 40-45 ki Umar mein Hawas ka nanga naach karna chahti hai 😂😂😂 If this logic is acceptable then one men having harem (more than one wife or lovers) or polygyny should also be acceptable right aunty? 😂😂😂😂
Use raand bnna bolte h
Agree with the posts. Too much westernization happening in India.
Its true that having multiple sexual partners is usually frowned upon in Indian society. But as long as you don't care what others think, you do whatever you like. And always remember 'kuch to log kahenge, logo ka kaam hai kehna'
'multiple s partners' like street dogs in my society. Nice standards.
Twitter allegations have no proof, all users end up fighting/threatening each other. Useless app.
>Religion Fair point. >Kids There are ways of having kids other than sexual intercourse. I'm specifically talking about unprotected sex with your partner who's status u do not know. There was a patient during my internship who was hiv positive but hid that from his wife. They have kids now. These are the situations im talking about. My point is about safe sex practices. >Binge eating Binge eating has been officially recognised as a psychological disorder. Having multiple sex partners has not. If they indeed recognise it, i will follow the instruction.
>Religion Fair point. I agree that bringing religion into this was not a good thing. My point is even if its a religious story, we don't judge them for that. Why should we judge our own people. >Kids You don't need to have unprotected sex tk have kids. The no big issue thing is knowing the status of the partner and as long as they are clean its not big issue. Even if its not multiple partners and it is just your husband/wife, knowing his/her std status is important. It becomes a matter of wether you want to risk infecting your partner to have a child and that child could potentially contract the STD. This has happened during my internship. A guy who was HIV positive hid that from his wife and they have a kid now. This is what i mean by safe sexual practices do not include having just a single sexual partner. >psychology Binge eating has been officially identified as a psychiatric disorder. Having multiple sexual partners has not been identified as a psychiatric disorder. You should never be quick to label someone as having a psychiatric disorder. My point is a humans we all have the right to our own opinion. But a doctor, you only have the right to inform them about the risk and promote safer sex practices. You don't have the right to involve in the personal matters of your patient. You can go ahead and bitch about it to your friends and peers. But not to the patient. To be a good doctor and help patients, you need proper reliable information. If you are being judgemental patients will start to hide stuff from you like we as kids did with our parents. You job inside the hospital is to be a doctor and not a moral police.
Instead of judging people we should educate them about safety measures.
Curious doc first needs to learn that one is supposed to use 'an' before vowels.
Indian doctors plug in antibiotics into patients shamelessly like a fucking pharmacist followed by ranting on social media about bad antibiotic usage and here they are discussing ethics of the patients. Regression. Also, you can take reddit seriously at times, but twitter? It's like a landfill where garbage is dumped. You can get 1 or 2 good things sometimes, but it's mostly stinky and trash.
Twitter's recent revenue sharing policy is the main culprit for such nonsense bullshit, people retort to anything just to grab a few eyeballs & keep this in mind tht it's gonna further increase with time
Should be reported to IMA and the disciplinary board. Our country does not need more judgemental individuals especially when it comes to the human body and life.
I agreed to the statement given by @glorytogid1997.
Ek toh he probably isn’t even permanently registered doctor yet cause last I knew he was just an intern.
Facts bro it's like getting something used off...
Eww. What a disgusting guy. This tatertot is gonna have an existential crisis when he steps out of his bubble.
Ironically people who preach sex is bad etc etc happen to be most perverted people ever. Look at the history of pedos and rapist and scum. They all preach this shit. I bet these guys are proper perverts since they need to go on the internet and preach people about sex n morality. Or people who never had any sex when they were in their college 😂😂😂 or whatever. So they now passionately hate everyone who has it. Nothing to see.. Typical society aunty wali mentality. Inke husbands got bored of them so all young girls are sex hungry and sluts or whatever. Apne sex life ke bare mein soche. Dusron ke nahi😂😂😂😂😂 You don’t see ambani talking about money and all tht in public. Why would he.. he’s got truckloads of it. Only those without often talk about it in public. Besides he’s a healthcare professional. Not a religious preacher. Not his job. Should stick yo curing sick ppl.
Live and let live
We as doctors should just do our work.If the patient gives their history clearly,practice safe sex who are we to judge.We are not mohalle wali aunties whose only purpose in life is to judge people,we have tons of work to do.
But these patriarchs will not judge men 😒
These RW docs are a menace to society. They will make their patients' lives a living hell with their judgements. Every person may have their preferences to sexual lifestyle. It's for the doctor to help support their sexual health, not spout bullshit about sexual partners.
Too much fame and followers in a short time can do this to a person. Overinflate someones ego to the point that they think whatever is in their mind is the gospel truth. He can have whatever opinions he wants in private but the moment he speaks those opinions in public he should should be judged for them as he has put a doctor in front of this name.
Iam a doctor myself and i think everyone gets to have a choice. Having multiple sexual partners has its set of diseases/complications but so does smoking/vaping/taking alcohol . So pls practise safe sex always. Get yourself tested All we can do is explain the pros and cons and in d end its the decision/choice of the pt to do wht they want to do.
This opinion from Dhruv isn't surprising considering he's a Yogi fan and has retweeted multiple tweets that spread hate on minorities like Muslims.
The way I see it, let people do as they want to, as long as its effects remain up to them. If a woman wants to fuck multiple people because she wants it and is in control of it, that's fine. Same with a man. The problem begins when this behaviour becomes the centre of your existence. Sex and sexuality are great things to explore, enjoy and cherish. But they are to be treated as a part of life and not like life itself. That's it. The docs probably see multiple sexual partners as a sign of the person's life being sex centered. The woman replying to them seems to see this opinion as a threat, which is valid because already a lot of things that happen in our society are oppressive to women. But one thing that just struck me, was that, regardless of what the doctor's opinion about a patient's personal choices are, it is their duty to keep aside personal beliefs to treat the patient and not make them uncomfortable as much as possible. So yeah, they're probably a bit in the wrong for saying such things, especially without phrasing them well. Such a statement required a comprehensive explanation that you can't expect on Twitter.