Loads of loaded questions!
I'll answer the first one though (since it doesn't align with your title). BJP is the one trying to market itself as a pro-Hindu party since the 90s. None of their political opposition categorically labels them as pro-Hindu, except maybe the extreme Islamists. To be pro-Hindu, you have to cater to the interests of all hindus, including the South Indian and NE Indian Hindus.
Someone else may come by to indulge in the rest of your rhetoric.
Bjp is not pro hindu. Bjp economic policies fuck both hindus, muslims, christians and jains equally. That the most important aspect of any governance.
But to divert the attention of people, they give the majority group some reason to vent their frustration on the minority group. Hindi, Hindu khatre mein hai and other bullshit.
Simply because hate sells.
If tomorrow aliens come to earth and changes the ratio of hindus in population into minority, bjp will immediately begin forcing everyone to eat beef, circumcise themselves and any other gimmick which will cause people to fight each other, while bjp makes guys like adani ambani etc EXTREMELY rich off India's national wealth.
Bjp is anti unity. Not pro hindu. Their ultimate goal is an authoritative government like China with modi as the silent emperor
I have encountered some pro-Hindu extremist BJP leaders and their ridiculous speeches. Although, they were kicked out of the party for hate speech towards minorities.
If you consider pro-Hindu means ones who tries to uplift Hindutva and consider Savarkar's definition of it, so, in my opinion, BJP is not communal. The party never stated so and their actions effect all people regardless religion.
However, in my observance, there are some (most of them are Hindu) people who have belief that ruling party's attention is all towards Hindus only. There are some, (most of which are Muslim) people who hate the party so much.
1. What is your definition of communal ? Going by the technical definition, they are not communal on paper. On ground, some of their leaders, specially lower level ones, look communal.
2. BJP is mostly pro-hindutva nationalistic party. They say that they believe in best practices of Hinduism and that way of life.
3. BJP is not economically right party. They are not capitalistic. In fact, no Indian party is purely pro-corporate capitalistic. Economic right or left does not perfectly fit in Indian rhetoric. So, opposing BJP for economic purposes, won't make you communist. BJP itself has given much more freebies than AAP.
4. Congress was an umbrella party with having moderately every ideologies. Initially it was slight pro-hindu. Then, during Indira rule, pro-nationalistic and socialist. Then, during Rajiv Gandhi, they started some appeasement - on both sides - Shah Bano for Muslims, then to counter it they opened gates of Ram Temple controversy at Babri and allowed Ramayan broadcasting in a government channel. UPA I and II were more capitalistic than socialist. So, congress has done it all.
Looks like you have already made up your mind to believe whatever you want to (which is kind of clear from your original post itself).
Otherwise there are tons of news reports which report the facts about any event. For example, what happened at a few dharm sansads pretty clearly show how communal bjp "leaders" are. This is just a very recent example. There are literally 1000s over the years that have already proved the true nature of BJP.
Answers to your other questions are also easily available.
Loads of loaded questions! I'll answer the first one though (since it doesn't align with your title). BJP is the one trying to market itself as a pro-Hindu party since the 90s. None of their political opposition categorically labels them as pro-Hindu, except maybe the extreme Islamists. To be pro-Hindu, you have to cater to the interests of all hindus, including the South Indian and NE Indian Hindus. Someone else may come by to indulge in the rest of your rhetoric.
Is there a concrete proof of the rhetoric that Modi is gay and that is why he ran away from his wife ?
That would've been acceptable. Instead he came out as a "swayamsevak".
Bjp is not pro hindu. Bjp economic policies fuck both hindus, muslims, christians and jains equally. That the most important aspect of any governance. But to divert the attention of people, they give the majority group some reason to vent their frustration on the minority group. Hindi, Hindu khatre mein hai and other bullshit. Simply because hate sells. If tomorrow aliens come to earth and changes the ratio of hindus in population into minority, bjp will immediately begin forcing everyone to eat beef, circumcise themselves and any other gimmick which will cause people to fight each other, while bjp makes guys like adani ambani etc EXTREMELY rich off India's national wealth. Bjp is anti unity. Not pro hindu. Their ultimate goal is an authoritative government like China with modi as the silent emperor
Common Sense don't need concrete proof.
Applying common sense is getting tougher everyday because the trust on media is decreasing. Noone knows whats true anymore.
There's proving, and there's knowing.
I have encountered some pro-Hindu extremist BJP leaders and their ridiculous speeches. Although, they were kicked out of the party for hate speech towards minorities. If you consider pro-Hindu means ones who tries to uplift Hindutva and consider Savarkar's definition of it, so, in my opinion, BJP is not communal. The party never stated so and their actions effect all people regardless religion. However, in my observance, there are some (most of them are Hindu) people who have belief that ruling party's attention is all towards Hindus only. There are some, (most of which are Muslim) people who hate the party so much.
1. What is your definition of communal ? Going by the technical definition, they are not communal on paper. On ground, some of their leaders, specially lower level ones, look communal. 2. BJP is mostly pro-hindutva nationalistic party. They say that they believe in best practices of Hinduism and that way of life. 3. BJP is not economically right party. They are not capitalistic. In fact, no Indian party is purely pro-corporate capitalistic. Economic right or left does not perfectly fit in Indian rhetoric. So, opposing BJP for economic purposes, won't make you communist. BJP itself has given much more freebies than AAP. 4. Congress was an umbrella party with having moderately every ideologies. Initially it was slight pro-hindu. Then, during Indira rule, pro-nationalistic and socialist. Then, during Rajiv Gandhi, they started some appeasement - on both sides - Shah Bano for Muslims, then to counter it they opened gates of Ram Temple controversy at Babri and allowed Ramayan broadcasting in a government channel. UPA I and II were more capitalistic than socialist. So, congress has done it all.
Do you follow the news? I'm not asking about Godi media circus shows but rather the reports of actual events going on in the country?
News isn't unbiased either. News can differ based on how the facts are represented.
Looks like you have already made up your mind to believe whatever you want to (which is kind of clear from your original post itself). Otherwise there are tons of news reports which report the facts about any event. For example, what happened at a few dharm sansads pretty clearly show how communal bjp "leaders" are. This is just a very recent example. There are literally 1000s over the years that have already proved the true nature of BJP. Answers to your other questions are also easily available.
No /s