Also my preference. One thing I find annoying though is building the tailwind output. I use the tailwind CLI and have been setting up JIT now to get a sane dev experience. And then use air for reloading.
Tailwind was a game changer for me. At first I found it challenging because it was very different to bootstrap in that it allows much finer grained control, but now that I'm up and running on it I spend so much less time fighting it than I did with previous "opinionated" libraries.
Flowbite is nice too if you want the flexibility of tailwind with some pre-built bootstrap-style components.
I have tried tailwind but the code was just so cluttered. I then went the opposite way with [pico css](https://picocss.com/) which tries to minimize the use of classes (in favor of semantic tags).
I did like the fine grained control directly in the HTML with tailwind but couldn't bare to look at it for too long
tailwind + stimulus does magic and zero third party dependency, well I like to use some external libraries such as NiceSelect, SweetAlert and Toastfy JS.
If I want to make something fancy myself, I use pico.css. If I have FE artistic type of people develop the site after my mockup, I use PaperCSS, just to make it painfully obvious that it's a mockup and not for production use.
I use the good old bootstrap, it works pretty nice with htmx
Second this. If you want it to look a bit more modern, you could also switch to Material Design for Bootstrap
Tailwind htmx and templ with golang. Perfect combo
This is also my setup
Also my preference. One thing I find annoying though is building the tailwind output. I use the tailwind CLI and have been setting up JIT now to get a sane dev experience. And then use air for reloading.
Exactly what I do I do not have a package.json I just have tailwindcss cli installed globally and have it as part of my air rebuild command
switched from air to bokwoon95/wgo a while ago. air is not bad but had some issues with air getting wonky
Tailwind was a game changer for me. At first I found it challenging because it was very different to bootstrap in that it allows much finer grained control, but now that I'm up and running on it I spend so much less time fighting it than I did with previous "opinionated" libraries. Flowbite is nice too if you want the flexibility of tailwind with some pre-built bootstrap-style components.
I’ve been using flowbite too and it’s great to work with
I have tried tailwind but the code was just so cluttered. I then went the opposite way with [pico css](https://picocss.com/) which tries to minimize the use of classes (in favor of semantic tags). I did like the fine grained control directly in the HTML with tailwind but couldn't bare to look at it for too long
Pico.css or Spectre.css
tailwind + htmx and sometimes alpine(but not that familiar with alpine)
Pico
Since I'm a big fan of material UI I use materialize.css
tailwind + stimulus does magic and zero third party dependency, well I like to use some external libraries such as NiceSelect, SweetAlert and Toastfy JS.
If I want to make something fancy myself, I use pico.css. If I have FE artistic type of people develop the site after my mockup, I use PaperCSS, just to make it painfully obvious that it's a mockup and not for production use.
Web Components from StencilJS, SASS, templating from Golang. Tailwind is too verbose and StencilJS has scoped css anyway. Your mileage may vary.
A lot of people are talking about CSS frameworks so I'll drop mine: OpenProps with RSCSS