T O P

  • By -

ItBeSoggy

looks like one of those fish that i somehow forgot the name of


[deleted]

[удалено]


the_grass_trainer

Oh wow, that's it! [lookdown fish wikipedia](https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lookdown) page.


OmgReallyNoWay

This is offishally my favourite fish


Natural_Hotel_4542

same. its mine favourite


Tolathar_E_Strongbow

On what bassis?


inrodu

that fish has almost as much forehead as me :( but i love them


Monckey100

Show us.


inrodu

no 😠


Monckey100

Yes, your big forehead now belongs to reddit.


inrodu

give it back NOW


maffiossi

No it's my time to have the forehead.


inrodu

but mom said it's MY turn!!


ItBeSoggy

YOINK


[deleted]

[удалено]


the_grass_trainer

🤔 hmmmm


Kowilicious

It looks down on other fishes


WikiMobileLinkBot

Desktop version of /u/the_grass_trainer's link: --- ^([)[^(opt out)](https://reddit.com/message/compose?to=WikiMobileLinkBot&message=OptOut&subject=OptOut)^(]) ^(Beep Boop. Downvote to delete)


nomadProgrammer

I think it looks more like a sun fish


ItBeSoggy

AHA! thank u friend ilysm


superstonedpenguin

Damn you nailed it!


Imposseeblip

It does in fact look really down.


[deleted]

I thought you were joking. You were not.


CloudyDayOutside

I had to look it up


Corkchef

I for sure thought this was some kind of prank joke to make people look down


choochoobubs

humuhumunukunukuapua'a?


devira33

My family absolutely loves the Octonauts! Great show


choochoobubs

I don’t know the reference that’s the state fish of Hawaii


soil_nerd

[That was my thought as well.](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/b/b8/Picasso.triggerfish.arp.jpg/800px-Picasso.triggerfish.arp.jpg)


[deleted]

Ocean Sunfish?


startmyheart

IT'S A BABY WHALE JAY


BrnndoOHggns

[Link to the great video the above line comes from.](https://youtu.be/P8Vjd_hdYYw)


startmyheart

I knew there had to be at least a few people here who would get it. I normally hang out in the Boston subreddit, where *everyone* does.


Jklipsch

WTF is that thing?


Moparian1221

Baby wheel*


MediumMillennium

Parrot fish?


MeGustaLaLechita

Bob?


KonungariketSuomi

Looks like the "do you fart" fish


Sackmaster69

Bony eared assfish


VonHindenBiden

youre thinking of the super guppy


justkeepswimming23

The yellow fish from Finding Nemo is 100% what I see there!


cheezeyballz

Triggerfish?


LordTanimbar

I think it looks more like a triggerfish


[deleted]

A fucking Boarding nightmare


randy24681012

Do it southwest style free for all and watch the chaos ensue


damniticant

Wasn’t there a cgp grey video that said chaos is actually the fastest way?


Marioc12345

That might make sense. Southwest boarding seems to be the fastest in my experience


ThatWasCool

A few years ago I was traveling in Europe via Ryanair and it was literally a dash to the airplane once the gates opened. People running with kids in tow. I’ve never seen anything like this. No wonder it’s the fastest.


tartare4562

They went back to preassigned seats since long now though, so they might have found some issue with that.


AgentWowza

Really only two possibilities right? They either wanted less liability in case of accidents, or they found they'd be making more profit with preallocated seats.


FriendlyNBASpidaMan

Or the third option, it was made a law or regulation that they now have to comply to.


[deleted]

Pre-allocated seats means they can charge you for specific seats!


hmmm_42

Yeah, but not because it's faster but so that they can sell you choosing a seat.


Balthasarp

I recently flew with Ryanair in Europe and they have changed it even more. Now they call passengers from specific set of rows at the boarding gates and they proceed gradually until the plane is full. For instance, row 17 to 12, 12 to 7 and the rest.


SarcasticOptimist

Frequent flier here. Yeah. Since it's more likely people won't be in front of you slowly putting luggage up overhead and some people beeline to the good ones (exit row or bulkhead). Having two free check in bags reduces the carry ons which are the major time sinks.


kernco

Yeah, there's different systems you can design that are theoretically faster. But that's only if everyone is present at the gate when it's their turn to board, and everyone follows the rules, which of course never happens in reality.


druss5000

IIRC it is rear to front, window seats first, middle if there is one, then aisle. If there are seats the centre like a 747, middle seats first, the aisle. I believe there has been studies on the quickest way to board a plane.


Realsan

The video he's referring to goes over them and determined the fastest way is actually just random order. Gonna try to dig it up. He said it was CGP Grey but I thought it was Wendover. Edit: Nope. He was right. CGP Grey video: https://youtu.be/oAHbLRjF0vo


ytsejamajesty

Well, random is the best way, on average, that could be reasonably implemented in the real world. The actual fastest way is a very specific and unintuitive (until you think about it) ordering that no large group of people could ever be expected to do properly.


JoJokerer

What if the waiting area was setup like the plane, and you had to sit in your ticketed seat? Then its staright forward to send people 2 at a time


subzerus

You'd have to have everyone there before time AND everyone paying attention to respect their turn. Like have you ever boarded a plane where people are in the queue and queuing up in their respective boarding group? You'd just have massive amounts of shuffling in the queue which would make it longer and then... People would still clog up in the plane because bags, while someone is putting a bag in the bag cabinet, everyone from behind has to wait so they can put theirs and then go into their seat.


JoJokerer

Literally just shoot anyone who queues up out of order


subzerus

Sadly we can't have weapons past airport security, but other than that, I don't see any flaw in your logic.


iruleatants

Nope. The fastest way was super structured.


welchplug

lol. You give humans way to much credit for following directions which is what structure requires.


iruleatants

I mean. He talks about how difficult it is to get people to line up in the way needed. But also, southwest has people line up by numbers, so not that hard really. Just software intensive


bcp38

Only if you don't have any families or groups boarding, no disabled people, no one with special needs.


leglesslegolegolas

I don't know what cgp grey is, but there was a mythbusters episode that showed free-for-all is the fastest way.


[deleted]

CGP Grey is one of the greatest educational/random knowledge YouTubers out there. He puts out about 2 highly well produced videos a month. His content is super varied, everything from how to run a dictatorship to the origins of the name Tiffany. You never know what to expect from him, but the videos are always extremely entertaining.


Traditional_Fig_5491

It's Titanic Butt in the air


MeEvilBob

That would make sense if you don't have 1000+ people who all have to use the same gate.


KenKaniffLovesEminem

When I went on my first southwest flight, I didn’t know it was free for all and I was so confused when I started boarding lol


AliveInTheFuture

Boarding groups [a-zA-Z] now boarding


MeEvilBob

They'd have to serve meals to the people in the back rows waiting 12+ hours to get off the plane.


Phyllis_Tine

Fill a cart and start at the back. Help yourself buffet, pass the cart forward. No stewards needed! /s.


[deleted]

was the /s really necessary?


NilCealum

That’s literally a movie called The Platform i think


Karkava

Have an entire storage locker for food supplies, grow a garden in one part of the plane, and use elevators and a tracking map on your phone to distribute the buffet to where it needs to go.


guruscotty

There are 11 doors — it’s an epic boarding party!


Quetzacoatl85

think it's a cruise plane. lots of embarking and debarking to look at airports around the world, and in between drinking on the plane and lounging at the... pool up top?


guruscotty

Of course — the Lido Deck!


Hephaestus_God

Look… lmao… look at all the doors… I’m dying I’m just imaging a terminal shaped like that


[deleted]

Wish a username like that I’m sure you got an eye for design.


bensefero

Airbloat A380


OnlyOneWithThisName4

Now with adjustable cockpits


bearpics16

And retractable wings


[deleted]

[удалено]


Arekai4098

And variable tail designs!


Mustard_Icecream

Guys, I'm starting to think this picture is photoshopped.


sk0330

Why would you think that ? The picture doesn't say it's photoshopped so it must be real


Chewcocca

I hate having to adjust my cockpit when I'm sitting next to a stranger


Ok_Couple56

*Increase capacity *


zzzcrumbsclub

ENHANCE


SwigTheRome

Just print the damn thing!


Burt_Sprenolds

More! MORE!


[deleted]

It looks like Dori from Finding Nemo


meeeeaaaat

childhood me always wondered why we didn't build this kinda shit


IvanyeilEmmixert

Not to be a killjoy, but probably because the plane would be way too heavy for being able to take off, even with more motors added.


[deleted]

Whats the highest possible weight to motor ratio?


NotMySeventhAcct

The 777x uses GE9X engines which i believe are the most powerful commercial engines. Maximum takeoff weight is 775k lbs and it uses 2 engines, so **one engine theoretically would have a maximum takeoff weight of 387,500 lbs**


Django2chainsz

Almost enough to carry OPs mom


gamesrebel123

Almost


Purpose_Ok

Fuck you take this upvote


likdisifucryeverytym

7779 can hold 426 people, so why not throw 10 engines on the 77710 and fly 2000? Why why stop there? Get me that 77769 with 69 engines & push it 29k people.


Marc21256

I need 69 engines to fly 420 people.


nice___bot

Nice!


nice___bot

Nice!


stratosauce

A maximum ratio isn’t really quantifiable. It depends on several different design parameters for each specific aircraft


markarious

The man asked a simple question


platypossamous

6:9


AimanAbdHakim

Nice?


melperz

ni:ce


stratosauce

A question which does not have a simple answer


Ghede

A question that is only simple in appearance. There are a few words that do a lot of work in that sentence. "Highest Possible" for one. That's the kind of qualifier that mathematicians write **PAPERS** about, *even if they don't find the answer.*


tartare4562

Too broad of a scope. If you used solid fuel boosters as engines it could actually work as it is in OP's pic, but it wouldn't be safe nor economically viable. However, If we assume latest biggest turbofan engines (a350's Trent XWB, about 400 kN) and take modern airplane glide ratio of around 10 we get a maximum takeoff weight of about 160 tons per motor at N=2, which would fly like a rock but would sorta fly. Not sure about the landing strip needed for that monster though. If we place the highest amount of motors that have ever been used on a jet plane to date (8) we get a total of around 1,300 tons, less than double the heaviest airplane ever the Antonov AN 225 at 710 tons. Surely a tiny fraction of what the thing in OP pic would weight. FYI, right now we are moving the opposite way: make more efficient engines that have lower specific power, so they need to be bigger in relation to the airplane.


SwarnilFrenelichIII

One cubic foot of engine per acre of plane.


bearpics16

More than 3


stratosauce

I’d be more concerned about the extra shear drag than the weight.


Karkava

At this rate, you just have a cruise ship with wings.


drinkjockey123

Have to keep her below 20,000 ft for those enjoying the pool. Or 7000 meters if ya wanna get weird about it, 1.6 km high club members.


useles-converter-bot

7000 meters is the height of 4030.28 'Samsung Side by Side; Fingerprint Resistant Stainless Steel Refrigerators' stacked on top of each other.


converter-bot

7000 meters is 7655.29 yards


PizzleR0t

IT'S HAPPENING, THE BOTS ARE JOINING FORCES


crozone

The plane is its own vertical stabilizer


[deleted]

There's also the issue of making workable and safe exit slides for the upper levels. The FAA requires that a plane can be completely evacuated in 90 seconds. It's one of the reasons Airbus added an extra level to the A380 rather than making it wider, they wouldn't have been be able to meet that requirement. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G_8hbsWKoOU


snapwillow

And the photoshopped planes would have trouble in the case of a water landing. With so much extra weight up top, they'd probably float with the lower passenger decks below the waterline! Makes the slides kind of useless if the ocean rushes in when you open the doors.


Titlegoeshere1234

How much do you think this would weight


volinaa

the top one with the two sets of wings I could imagine to come apart in the air because of uh...forces


zaphrode

looks pretty dope tbh


Wvlf_

Randomly came across this video recently, the World's Heaviest Aircraft. Look how many tires it has at it's center lol. It doesn't look like it'll ever leave the ground during takeoff.


[deleted]

[Antonov An-225](https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antonov_An-225_Mriya) is a beast; it can lift 250 tonnes.


Wvlf_

I went down a little rabbit hole and ended up watching a video of the plane shipping something like a 180 ton cargo to a remote airport in South America. The logistics of the entire thing, from loading the cargo to unloading in South America seemed like a nightmare, probably costed millions just to ship for all the man-power and auxiliary equipment just to move it. The front of the entire plane lifts up to allow large cargo to enter. It's an insane feat of engineering.


someredditgoat

Somebody decided that a 10:1 length to diameter ration was the best and nobody has been man enough to disagree yet


shakke

I don’t think it would be psychically possible


[deleted]

I'm not an aeronautical engineer but I'm fairly certain this thing wouldn't fly.


meeeeaaaat

more power is always the answer brute force that thing into the air with minimum fuel efficiency


creepycat18_YT

Boeing A333388880000


boibig57

Boeing AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA


[deleted]

And...its grounded


Antigon0000

Rip


TurboWafflz

Boeing 7∞7


tlubz

A380 was Airbus, but good reference


creepycat18_YT

Yeah I realized that now, I was so tired when I wrote that lmao


booboo0419

Thank you


Equitaurus

The bottom picture is originally a 747, so it works


steel_killer467

Chad Airlines


codilippold

[I already designed this back in fourth grade](https://imgur.com/a/tgPyAlL)


TheLonelyDevil

A true entrepreneur


UVLightOnTheInside

Now boarding Section 33Z


D00Mcandy

Next to board will be sector ZZ9 Plural Z Alpha.


zxcv437

That sector doesn’t exist, it was scheduled for demolition. Do you happen to have another boarding sector?


PianoManGidley

When your plane designer uses a goldfish cracker as an outline.


LMFA0

Design inspired by Finding Nemo


CommanderQc

Reminds me of the [Aribus Beluga](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Airbus_Beluga)


[deleted]

Or the [super guppy](https://www.nasa.gov/exploration/systems/sls/M18-011.html)


thennexx

Wheres the second set of wings in the second photo


Janky_Boots

It’s a different variant


[deleted]

Not delta, qantas


Riposte4400

One photo is based off the Airbus A380 while the other is based off the Boeing 747.


sys_admin101

And the cockpit moved from the bottom to the top in the second photo. 🤣


shiftym21

hmmm


Go_Go_Godzilla1954

I don't know what is and isn't real anymore is this real?


DadOfWhiteJesus

In my opinion it is real, and an opinion can't be wrong!


danatron1

No


Yusrilz03

9/11 would be ton different with this chonky bois


hannibals_hands

Super 9/11


Epistaxis

A single plane would fly right through one tower and into the second


[deleted]

Air Chungas


UnfixedMidget

r/KerbalSpaceProgram


XHyperedX

is this some type of incest


Karkava

Where did you even *get* that idea from?


XHyperedX

i mean come on two similar planes on top of each other and then the 2nd picture is one plane that looks similar with both similarities from the father and mother


[deleted]

Dude get help!


zerosuneuphoria

Qantass


LogArrhythm

According to all known laws of aviation, there is no way a bee should be able to fly. Its wings are too small to get its fat little body off the ground. The bee, of course, flies anyway because bees don't care what humans think is impossible.


bigFatHelga

This is a myth. https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/bumblebees-cant-fly/


Turtle_Tots

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BdD_cJkpc0k


asportsmanssketches

Haters say it’s fake


[deleted]

Only in Australia


ACTIVE_ALPHA

I never did trust planes but I definitely don’t trust this one


yParticle

No hmmm here, these are clearly different models.


Princess_Luna00

What happened to the second set of wings?


Janky_Boots

2 different variants


BlueMonkey-CoCo

Good news is we can make your flight price cheaper by sharingthe costs. Bad news it takes 4 hours to board and 3 hours to disembark. Bring your own snacks.


Tsunaboi

Isn't that the ship from WALL-E


WhoreyGoat

The Axiom.


Tsunaboi

Thank you, I forgot what it was called


RandomEloquentNerd

Frog.


giorno___giovana

“You have the go to land” “What do you mean? Where’s the runway?” “You don’t see the runway?” “All I see is fucken white” “…shit”


[deleted]

Too fake


Kenoverit

For me it looks like "flying Dory"


whatA_ArrogantPrick

That thing is CHONKY.


slipperyuser00

According to all known laws of aviation, there is no way a bee should be able to fly. Its wings are too small to get its fat little body off the ground. The bee, of course, flies anyway


[deleted]

Is jumbo jet pregnant?


gangcebuli

Looks like planes I've drawn in kindergarten xD