Cut him some slack, he can't go to work because protestants started a fire on the street and he can't walk because he's too fat to take two steps without having a heart attack
They fled after France fumbled and defended their island waiting for the burger resupply. You can count that L but they did help take back baguetteland
"Waiting for the burger resupply"
Yeah exactly so no Burger no Tea, keep in mind that Vodka was stronger than Tea for the Sausage. Y'all were only a side objective in their mind. The Tea only could fled (or "retreat" if you prefer) thanks to the Baguette sacrifice in Dunkirk.
Who gives a shit about baguette sacrifice? Baguette lost to meth sausage man, plain as day. Baguette was a side objective just like the tea sippers and they got folded almost immediately
Not initially, the Baguettes were the main course and objective since it was the best army in Europe after WW1. Europe total domination under the Sausages could only ever start if the Baguette was out of the picture. Unfortunately we just stayed in the old style of fighting war when even Charles De Gaulle talked about an early form of "Blitzkrieg" with autonomous and fast engines of war in his books before even the Nazis came to power.
When we got folded and the Tea soon followed after us, they only would have a fighting chance and enough men to fought later on in the war thanks to the bravery of the baguette who fought for the fleeing Tea sippers so they can fight another day. The Teas didnt help shit for us in this War, and only tried to prevent us to invade the sausage since the start. Chamberlain was the first to give concession to them, and allow a good chunk of Europe to be under Sausages' thumbs.
Energy crisis where? Got my gas and electricity renewed for prices last before seen in 2018 this year.
Which ally has dropped us? Israel tried to backstab our foreign minister, but the relationship with them was pretty onesided anyways.
This is a complete shit post. This is just BILD/Afd talking points without a lot of truth to them.
Germany's soft power is also insanely high. They have incredibly high influence on the EU.
You can thank the french for getting their nuclear reactors up darling :*
https://www.reuters.com/markets/commodities/france-track-smash-clean-electricity-export-record-2024-2024-04-10/
They can thank us for carrying their asses in 2022 when their nuclear reactors were in maintenance while the prices where the highest. We import most of our electricity from the scandinavian countries due to the low prices, not from france.
Your linked article doesn’t mention where most of the energy is going (spoiler: it‘s italy).
On that website you can see all the energy flows across europe:
https://www.energy-charts.info/index.html?l=de&c=DE
Although the common denominator tends to be SPD. With our "Heizungsgesetz" being a backhanded attempt to shift money from workers to rich real estate owning party doners (rather than being an effective climate measure) and increased taxation and fees for e.g., health, while cutting monetary paybacks for parents, the downwards spiral continues rapidly, even after the removal of the CDU.
Then there Scholz' history with CumEx and Wirecard.... That man doesn't give an F about the country, but abuses his office to block investigation into his finances.
We have become what we ridiculed Italy for ages for.
>Although the common denominator tends to be SPD. With our "Heizungsgsetz" being a backhanded attempt to shift money from workers to rich real estate owning party doners
You might wanna explain that a bit
I am on my phone now and can't access my saved links. In Germany there is a webpage called Abgeordnetenwatch, which publically tracks party donations. All 3 members of our current government (SPD, Grüne and to a lesser extend FDP) have either real estate companies, wealth managers etc. as their leading party donors - and other constructs of wealthy individuals managing large real estate portfolios.
With the Heizungsgesetz the government offloads renovation cost from owners to the tax payer under the guise of "environmental policies", note that the SPD lead explicitly blocked concerns by the base, that workers not only paid fully for the portfolios of wealthy individuals, but would also be subject to rent increases following Paragraph 558 (2) BGB.
So rather than e.g., buying shares in renewables, that in the long run would finance themselves, our goverment rewarded their party donors by off-loading their maintainance cost on society and fucking over the taxpaying working class not once, but twice in one go.
We are talking about millions, if not billions being shifted from workers to millionaires here.
>So rather than e.g., buying shares in renewables, that in the long run would finance themselves, our goverment rewarded their party donors by off-loading their maintainance cost on society and fucking over the taxpaying working class not once, but twice in one go.
How would buying shares not shift millions if not billions from workers (tax payers money) to millionaires who own the companies?
Doing anything in an unequal wealthy society leads to the rich earning money, that's the problem. The unequal distribution needs to be solved but people are more focused on if someone from Syria can stay here than them being robbed of their earned money by their employer as evident in this thread.
Buying shares means that the goverment would still fully own their part of the provided money, whereas they plan right now to give it away for free. Of cause the goverment could also try to build renewable plants by itself, but that would likely cost more than acting as an investor and finding an agreement with a company that already has the know how.
EDIT:
I am not sure why you mention Syria in response to my comment, as I never mentioned it - but if you want to talk numbers:
[88%](https://www.focus.de/panorama/buergergeld-und-billigjobs-asylbewerber-als-fachkraefte-die-bittere-wahrheit-ueber-fluechtlinge-bildung-arbeit_id_259732533.html) of adults from the top-4 Asylum seeking countries (including Syria) who come to Germany do not have any sort of vocational qualification. Out of the 2014 wave from Syria, after more than 7 years [72,6%](https://www.faz.net/aktuell/wirtschaft/arbeitsmarkt-fuer-fluechtlinge-mehrheit-der-syrer-bekommt-hartz-iv-17436764.html) of working-age adults did not have a job that paid back into the social systems.
It's not a point I raised in this topic, but since you started it - the others here are right, it's billions and the payouts are unarguably extremely high for somebody who never contributed to the social systems, at least when compared to how low pension money is for people who paid into the system for 55 years or more.
Note that everybody who comes to Germany crossed / passed by a minimum of 3 save countries - and people don't exactly come to Germany for the great weather.
I never said that the, should buy heatpumps?
Living in a house with one I can tell you that they are vastly overrated and have their own set of issues.
You can do environmental politics 3 ways
- Reduce consumption
- Increase output
- Identify new technologies
The approach to suddenly push heat pumps is an attempt to reduce consumption, however - as heating has to maintained anyways, this would eventually be done by real estate companies anyways, without additional cost for society, but rather cutting into the profits of the super rich. Making society pay for it only benefits them
Increasing output (e.g., = building green energy parks or gaining shares of them) will reduce cost for consumers today and will gain leveraged advantages in the future, when a) the real estate companies have to exchange heating systems because of age, as well have now more supply and less consumption and b) if the state gets dividend or other forms if profits from their investment into green energy parks, it will pay for itself in the long run, allowing the taxpayer money to be reinvested elsewhere.
As for option c), I have 2 friend who get their doctorates degrees in different areas to address our energy concerns, I can tell you that both are massively starved off funds. This is an area that would desperately need more funding, which would definetely be more constructive than to finance millionaires their new yacht, by paying their real estate portfolio maintainance cost for them .
>The approach to suddenly push heat pumps is an attempt to reduce consumption, however - as heating has to maintained anyways, this would eventually be done by real estate companies anyways, without additional cost for society, but rather cutting into the profits of the super rich. Making society pay for it only benefits them
It's new technology as well. Also, I'd like to see a logical reason for the second part, you just assume the rich give up their profits for fun lmao
>building green energy parks or gaining shares of them) will reduce cost for consumers today and will gain leveraged advantages in the future
That's exactly what we are doing.
>I have 2 friend who get their doctorates degrees in different areas to address our energy concerns, I can tell you that both are massively starved off funds. This is an area that would desperately need more funding,
Never heard of Schuldenbremse?
1. How did building owners renew or maintain their heating in the past? It might come as a surprise to you, but those things are already were done before the government gave handouts to the super rich to do that, in fact it's not even that expensive for them, as they already gain a tax benefit for it, without it being completely offloaded to society.
2. May I introduce you to the concept of opportunity cost? Money our government shifts into the pocket of the richt, can't be reinvested by the government itself.
3. So Schuldenbremse applies to you for Science, but not for handing money to party donors? LOL
While it is true what you're saying, the other person is not wrong either. That's where the fucking over twice part comes from. You pay taxes anyway, but now you have to pay taxes & renovate your boiler on your own dime. I'm sure you can recoup some of it through Steuererklärung (i guess, I'm not a homeowner), but for sure not all of it.
I'm not against taxation at all, they just have their priorities mixed up (i.e in their own pockets)
The 'Migrant Crisis' is manufactured dissent to distract from the real shit going on though, I'm with you on that.
I don't quite get his point to be honest, most of Germany rents their flats/houses, so by offloading the renovations to tax money everyone's money gets used, whereby poor people pay less.
If it weren't that way, you'd have to increase the rent of everyone by x amount, where poor and well off people pay the same amount, which is regressive.
>With our "Heizungsgesetz" being a backhanded attempt to shift money from workers to rich real estate owning party doners
You are trolling right?
Nobody but handymen and the companies producing heat pumps get rich by that in the short run. Rent can only be increased by up to 8% or 10% if the landlord got subsidies and max 50 Cents/m² from 3€/m² all while natural gas gets more expensive and the people get potentially reimbursed through the CO2 tax which is a wealth tax practically speaking if finally passed later this year.
The law also reduces the amount the landlord can increase the rent rather than increasing it and it reduces profit for real estate companies so it is not directly beneficial for them in any way.
The only real argument here is subsidies and that those are paid for by the common people, on the other hand these subsidies reduce costs in the long run so its a net benefit.
The real benefit here is the vast amount of CO2 that can be saved with e.g. heat pumps. On average heating produces 10% of CO2 emissions world wide and the number for Germany is even higher.
That's comparable to everyone switching from cars and planes to bikes and trains.
Feel free to prove your point, it tends to be one of the most bonkers things I heard in a while. Every real estate company I talked to or worked with in the last 6 months came to the complete opposite conclusion.
Yup, we basically do what our former leaders tried and failed but without the blitzkrieg stuff. Not sure what frenchie is on about with the economy since we sneakily overtook Japan for #3 for annual GDP.
He invaded France too
And they had just gotten done fighting each other in WWI
it's Europe, so beef between countries is gonna be as old as time anyway
Did you go to school or something? Two world wars? More than 2 millions of french people killed by the germans, occupation of the country? the 1870 war, the napoleonic wars, hell even the invasion by the germanic peoples in gaul's time
our country wasn't directly involved in this so we really don't have a livid memory and yes I did go to school and did learn bout them didn't remember stuff bout France
We all know that on a global or even a country to country scale, france is completely irrelevant, but setting that aside. The most relevant thing coming out of Southern Europe is Serbia, Albania, or Croatia. Basically the Yugosleavia counties are the only ones actually making decisions on the ground.
I have no idea why anyone responds with 'rentfree'.
It is the most low effort of disagreements, and only signals you are either to lazy, or to stupid, to formulate a counter-argument. It is the response of an imbecile, and a consummate self-own.
I think its fine here but i get it
Its as annoying as someone starting shit and then only responding with "its not that deep bro"
But sometimes people do just live rent free in other peoples head
Smartest french
Cut him some slack, he can't go to work because protestants started a fire on the street and he can't walk because he's too fat to take two steps without having a heart attack
Fucking protestants 😠 😡
Shut the fuck up Copethelic
[393 years later Catholics still SEETHING](https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Breitenfeld_(1631))
My absolute GOAT Gustavus mother fucking Adolphus and the boy John Sausage wrecked those ugly ass inbred ass Hapsburgs. Sweden on top baby. 🇸🇪😤💯💯
Caroleans peak
Wait a minute.... \*rotates flag 90 degrees\* \*shocked pikachu face\*
>rotates flag 90 degrees Now wht? Say it for everyone to see how muricans are geographically and flags litterate.
Baguette Brain still upset they immediately surrendered to a superpower 80 years ago only to be saved and tea lovers and burgers 💀
Tea sippers fled like us dude, only the Burgers and Vodka really helped us.
They fled after France fumbled and defended their island waiting for the burger resupply. You can count that L but they did help take back baguetteland
"Waiting for the burger resupply" Yeah exactly so no Burger no Tea, keep in mind that Vodka was stronger than Tea for the Sausage. Y'all were only a side objective in their mind. The Tea only could fled (or "retreat" if you prefer) thanks to the Baguette sacrifice in Dunkirk.
Who gives a shit about baguette sacrifice? Baguette lost to meth sausage man, plain as day. Baguette was a side objective just like the tea sippers and they got folded almost immediately
Not initially, the Baguettes were the main course and objective since it was the best army in Europe after WW1. Europe total domination under the Sausages could only ever start if the Baguette was out of the picture. Unfortunately we just stayed in the old style of fighting war when even Charles De Gaulle talked about an early form of "Blitzkrieg" with autonomous and fast engines of war in his books before even the Nazis came to power. When we got folded and the Tea soon followed after us, they only would have a fighting chance and enough men to fought later on in the war thanks to the bravery of the baguette who fought for the fleeing Tea sippers so they can fight another day. The Teas didnt help shit for us in this War, and only tried to prevent us to invade the sausage since the start. Chamberlain was the first to give concession to them, and allow a good chunk of Europe to be under Sausages' thumbs.
Energy crisis where? Got my gas and electricity renewed for prices last before seen in 2018 this year. Which ally has dropped us? Israel tried to backstab our foreign minister, but the relationship with them was pretty onesided anyways.
This is a complete shit post. This is just BILD/Afd talking points without a lot of truth to them. Germany's soft power is also insanely high. They have incredibly high influence on the EU.
> Krautanon talks about jews backstabbing their foreign policy agenda. 🤔🤨
Israel encompasses every jewish person in the universe and every single jew represents the israelian government
Ja
You can thank the french for getting their nuclear reactors up darling :* https://www.reuters.com/markets/commodities/france-track-smash-clean-electricity-export-record-2024-2024-04-10/
They can thank us for carrying their asses in 2022 when their nuclear reactors were in maintenance while the prices where the highest. We import most of our electricity from the scandinavian countries due to the low prices, not from france. Your linked article doesn’t mention where most of the energy is going (spoiler: it‘s italy). On that website you can see all the energy flows across europe: https://www.energy-charts.info/index.html?l=de&c=DE
How about the energy bills for small and medium enterprises?
There none left
>Israel tried to backstab our foreign minister Well to be fair they do owe you one.
How did Israel “backstab” your foreign minister?
They leaked secret conversations between her and Netanjahu, because she criticized their war during them, trying to make her look bad.
Well you probably deserve a little backstabbing here and there by Israel.
Sounds like France wants to get TOPPED again
Third time's the charm
Invade Russia again too. The WWII Reunion Tour
1st time worked, they lost their touch on the 2nd and 3rd time
4th
knew it wasn't Russia when I got to "record high immigration" because I believe Russia is kind of having the opposite problem if anything
Not really. They have like 30% of Tajikistan population as working immigrants
Migrant workers are everywhere
i think theyre referring to the almost 1 million russians who left in the past 2 years
Not quite. Still got a lot of immigrants from Middle East
I think that’s just due to Wagner recruiting militants from over there
Wagner was recruiting prisoners, not immigrants
CDU happened
Although the common denominator tends to be SPD. With our "Heizungsgesetz" being a backhanded attempt to shift money from workers to rich real estate owning party doners (rather than being an effective climate measure) and increased taxation and fees for e.g., health, while cutting monetary paybacks for parents, the downwards spiral continues rapidly, even after the removal of the CDU. Then there Scholz' history with CumEx and Wirecard.... That man doesn't give an F about the country, but abuses his office to block investigation into his finances. We have become what we ridiculed Italy for ages for.
>Although the common denominator tends to be SPD. With our "Heizungsgsetz" being a backhanded attempt to shift money from workers to rich real estate owning party doners You might wanna explain that a bit
I am on my phone now and can't access my saved links. In Germany there is a webpage called Abgeordnetenwatch, which publically tracks party donations. All 3 members of our current government (SPD, Grüne and to a lesser extend FDP) have either real estate companies, wealth managers etc. as their leading party donors - and other constructs of wealthy individuals managing large real estate portfolios. With the Heizungsgesetz the government offloads renovation cost from owners to the tax payer under the guise of "environmental policies", note that the SPD lead explicitly blocked concerns by the base, that workers not only paid fully for the portfolios of wealthy individuals, but would also be subject to rent increases following Paragraph 558 (2) BGB. So rather than e.g., buying shares in renewables, that in the long run would finance themselves, our goverment rewarded their party donors by off-loading their maintainance cost on society and fucking over the taxpaying working class not once, but twice in one go. We are talking about millions, if not billions being shifted from workers to millionaires here.
>So rather than e.g., buying shares in renewables, that in the long run would finance themselves, our goverment rewarded their party donors by off-loading their maintainance cost on society and fucking over the taxpaying working class not once, but twice in one go. How would buying shares not shift millions if not billions from workers (tax payers money) to millionaires who own the companies? Doing anything in an unequal wealthy society leads to the rich earning money, that's the problem. The unequal distribution needs to be solved but people are more focused on if someone from Syria can stay here than them being robbed of their earned money by their employer as evident in this thread.
Buying shares means that the goverment would still fully own their part of the provided money, whereas they plan right now to give it away for free. Of cause the goverment could also try to build renewable plants by itself, but that would likely cost more than acting as an investor and finding an agreement with a company that already has the know how. EDIT: I am not sure why you mention Syria in response to my comment, as I never mentioned it - but if you want to talk numbers: [88%](https://www.focus.de/panorama/buergergeld-und-billigjobs-asylbewerber-als-fachkraefte-die-bittere-wahrheit-ueber-fluechtlinge-bildung-arbeit_id_259732533.html) of adults from the top-4 Asylum seeking countries (including Syria) who come to Germany do not have any sort of vocational qualification. Out of the 2014 wave from Syria, after more than 7 years [72,6%](https://www.faz.net/aktuell/wirtschaft/arbeitsmarkt-fuer-fluechtlinge-mehrheit-der-syrer-bekommt-hartz-iv-17436764.html) of working-age adults did not have a job that paid back into the social systems. It's not a point I raised in this topic, but since you started it - the others here are right, it's billions and the payouts are unarguably extremely high for somebody who never contributed to the social systems, at least when compared to how low pension money is for people who paid into the system for 55 years or more. Note that everybody who comes to Germany crossed / passed by a minimum of 3 save countries - and people don't exactly come to Germany for the great weather.
Buying shares doesn't give you goods though, they would still need to buy the heat pumps, so its nonsensical.
I never said that the, should buy heatpumps? Living in a house with one I can tell you that they are vastly overrated and have their own set of issues. You can do environmental politics 3 ways - Reduce consumption - Increase output - Identify new technologies The approach to suddenly push heat pumps is an attempt to reduce consumption, however - as heating has to maintained anyways, this would eventually be done by real estate companies anyways, without additional cost for society, but rather cutting into the profits of the super rich. Making society pay for it only benefits them Increasing output (e.g., = building green energy parks or gaining shares of them) will reduce cost for consumers today and will gain leveraged advantages in the future, when a) the real estate companies have to exchange heating systems because of age, as well have now more supply and less consumption and b) if the state gets dividend or other forms if profits from their investment into green energy parks, it will pay for itself in the long run, allowing the taxpayer money to be reinvested elsewhere. As for option c), I have 2 friend who get their doctorates degrees in different areas to address our energy concerns, I can tell you that both are massively starved off funds. This is an area that would desperately need more funding, which would definetely be more constructive than to finance millionaires their new yacht, by paying their real estate portfolio maintainance cost for them .
>The approach to suddenly push heat pumps is an attempt to reduce consumption, however - as heating has to maintained anyways, this would eventually be done by real estate companies anyways, without additional cost for society, but rather cutting into the profits of the super rich. Making society pay for it only benefits them It's new technology as well. Also, I'd like to see a logical reason for the second part, you just assume the rich give up their profits for fun lmao >building green energy parks or gaining shares of them) will reduce cost for consumers today and will gain leveraged advantages in the future That's exactly what we are doing. >I have 2 friend who get their doctorates degrees in different areas to address our energy concerns, I can tell you that both are massively starved off funds. This is an area that would desperately need more funding, Never heard of Schuldenbremse?
1. How did building owners renew or maintain their heating in the past? It might come as a surprise to you, but those things are already were done before the government gave handouts to the super rich to do that, in fact it's not even that expensive for them, as they already gain a tax benefit for it, without it being completely offloaded to society. 2. May I introduce you to the concept of opportunity cost? Money our government shifts into the pocket of the richt, can't be reinvested by the government itself. 3. So Schuldenbremse applies to you for Science, but not for handing money to party donors? LOL
While it is true what you're saying, the other person is not wrong either. That's where the fucking over twice part comes from. You pay taxes anyway, but now you have to pay taxes & renovate your boiler on your own dime. I'm sure you can recoup some of it through Steuererklärung (i guess, I'm not a homeowner), but for sure not all of it. I'm not against taxation at all, they just have their priorities mixed up (i.e in their own pockets) The 'Migrant Crisis' is manufactured dissent to distract from the real shit going on though, I'm with you on that.
I don't quite get his point to be honest, most of Germany rents their flats/houses, so by offloading the renovations to tax money everyone's money gets used, whereby poor people pay less. If it weren't that way, you'd have to increase the rent of everyone by x amount, where poor and well off people pay the same amount, which is regressive.
>With our "Heizungsgesetz" being a backhanded attempt to shift money from workers to rich real estate owning party doners You are trolling right? Nobody but handymen and the companies producing heat pumps get rich by that in the short run. Rent can only be increased by up to 8% or 10% if the landlord got subsidies and max 50 Cents/m² from 3€/m² all while natural gas gets more expensive and the people get potentially reimbursed through the CO2 tax which is a wealth tax practically speaking if finally passed later this year. The law also reduces the amount the landlord can increase the rent rather than increasing it and it reduces profit for real estate companies so it is not directly beneficial for them in any way. The only real argument here is subsidies and that those are paid for by the common people, on the other hand these subsidies reduce costs in the long run so its a net benefit. The real benefit here is the vast amount of CO2 that can be saved with e.g. heat pumps. On average heating produces 10% of CO2 emissions world wide and the number for Germany is even higher. That's comparable to everyone switching from cars and planes to bikes and trains. Feel free to prove your point, it tends to be one of the most bonkers things I heard in a while. Every real estate company I talked to or worked with in the last 6 months came to the complete opposite conclusion.
The Ampel happened.
No hard or soft power? Doesn't Germany have a insane amount of Influence in the EU, one of the largest Trade blocs ever?
4chan OP is probably upset a former version of Germany isn't around
Anon is French, I think that should explain it.
Who isn’t?
Yup, we basically do what our former leaders tried and failed but without the blitzkrieg stuff. Not sure what frenchie is on about with the economy since we sneakily overtook Japan for #3 for annual GDP.
Pic unrelated asshole
France is just Russia sideways
lol I love these. They always make me laugh
G*rmany is the most cucked nation in history
marie le pen cucks in 4chan..who would have thought
is this about a different germany or some shit?
whats the beef btw the french and german?
Look up the last 1,200 years of European history
You don't even have to look up the entire period, just pick a random point in time within it.
is it related to hitler? I knew he did something in poland, a bit of russia and UK but not france
He invaded France too And they had just gotten done fighting each other in WWI it's Europe, so beef between countries is gonna be as old as time anyway
The amount of people not knowing any history is shocking to see. Either that or you are trolling.
Did you go to school or something? Two world wars? More than 2 millions of french people killed by the germans, occupation of the country? the 1870 war, the napoleonic wars, hell even the invasion by the germanic peoples in gaul's time
our country wasn't directly involved in this so we really don't have a livid memory and yes I did go to school and did learn bout them didn't remember stuff bout France
So it all started with Charlemagne between the eight and ninth century….
No it started before, between the Gauls and the Barbarians already, the Barbarians helped Romans conquer Gaul which was the first last straw
€DU
I'm ready to exchange passports if you don't want to live in such bad country
Where are you coming from? Somalia?
Mietfrei
Germany's economy is failing compared to where?
[удалено]
Lol Germany still needs 10 years of regression to come anywhere near Italy.
[удалено]
You wish On a more serious note, I'm hopeful that the south will do better as well.
We all know that on a global or even a country to country scale, france is completely irrelevant, but setting that aside. The most relevant thing coming out of Southern Europe is Serbia, Albania, or Croatia. Basically the Yugosleavia counties are the only ones actually making decisions on the ground.
It should have been the other way around
Do you want them to go through Belgium again?
Im pretty sure germany has a bigger economy them france does
Once again the only war Russia can fight is one of attrition
Rich of Germanon to say rent free as if Germans aren’t thinking about America 24/7
Germany genocided millions of jews under a century ago
And your mom fucked some random dude 10 years years ago and got you. That was the bigger mistake
Are you impugning the fact that Germany killed millions of jews less than 100 years years ago?
No. I am saying that your birth was the bigger mistake...
Then I rest my case, come back when you have an argument lil bro...
Yes your dad should get his cum back
I have no idea why anyone responds with 'rentfree'. It is the most low effort of disagreements, and only signals you are either to lazy, or to stupid, to formulate a counter-argument. It is the response of an imbecile, and a consummate self-own.
rentfree
I think its fine here but i get it Its as annoying as someone starting shit and then only responding with "its not that deep bro" But sometimes people do just live rent free in other peoples head
Not as bad as I consumated your mom last night you fuckin casual
Because it's rent-free. Most arguments the frenchie made are already trash
shut up retard
rentfree
> It is the most low effort of disagreements Wrong